Cdra Faci Guide
Cdra Faci Guide
Cdra Faci Guide
Assessment (CDRA)
FACILITATOR’S GUIDE
Source: Supplemental Guidelines on Mainstreaming Climate and Disaster Risks in the Compre-
hensive Land Use Plans (Executive Summary), HLURB
Collect and organize climate change and
hazard information
STEP
Step 1 involves gathering and analysis of data on historical climate trends 1
including seasonal increase/decrease of temperature and precipitation and
the changes in number of days with extreme events. It also involves the
establishment of data on previous disasters and hazards that have affected
the locality.
The task involves collecting and reviewing important climate change information relevant to the lo-
cal government units. Using the Climate Change in the Philippines developed by PAGASA, the sea-
sonal changes in 1) temperature, 2) rainfall, and 3) extreme events for 2020 and 2050 in the
locality can be generated.
The computed values can be summarized and organized using Table 1: Projected Changes in
Climate Variables.
Request the Philippine Atmospheric Geophysical and Astronomical Services Administration (PAGASA) to
discuss Climate Scenarios and Projections to the participants including the process of deriving the season-
al changes.
Request PAGASA for downscaled climate projection. Ensure that all requests are made 2-3
weeks before the conduct of the workshop to give the mandated agencies time to prepare for
the needed data.
This involves gathering and analyzing hazard information to better understand the various natural
hazards affecting the locality. It also involves an inventory of historical disasters to establish
patterns of hazards in terms of its intensity and magnitude, including the scale of damages to
property (i.e. agriculture, houses, socio-economic support infrastructure and utilities) and how it
affected local communities (fatalities, injuries and number of severely affected families). At the end
of this task, LGUs should be able to compile the necessary hazard maps and describe the hazard
susceptibilities of barangays or specific areas within the city or municipality.
Gather hazard maps from mandated agencies and conduct ground validation if necessary.
The facilitator may include a session on the compilation, review and validation of risk maps
(hazard and resources maps) prior to the conduct of Step 1. The mandated agencies such as
the Mines and Geosciences Bureau (MGB) and the Philippine Institute of Volcanology and
Seismology (PHIVOLCS) may also be invited to discuss geo-hazards and existing hazard maps.
Compile and review the hazard maps considering the source (mandated agency), scale, year it
was published and the information that can be generated from them. Direct the participants to
organize the findings in the Table 2. Hazard Inventory Matrix and description, columns a, b,
c and d.
Coordinate with the concerned agencies for the presentation and interpretation of
technical inputs.
The record of past disaster events will provide a better understanding of hazards, specifically,
the pattern of occurrence, observed or experienced magnitude/intensity, and areas that are
often affected. The analysis of disaster records will generate information that the hazard maps
do not contain consider the number of casualties, affected families and individuals, and the
damaged houses and infrastructure.
Ask the participants to refer to Table 3: Records of Previous Disasters and provide the needed
information. The data can generated from the existing records of the Local Disaster Risk Reduction
and Management Office (LDRRMO) or other community-based DRRM data that the LGU have.
Workshops may be conducted through breakout or plenary sessions considering the time and duration of 2
days allotted for Step 1.
Based on hazard maps, and climate change projections, prepare a hazard susceptibility inventory
matrix in order to describe the susceptibilities of the municipality/city for sudden and slow onset
hazards. Hazard susceptibility attributed to climate change (i.e. sea-level rise), including past
extreme weather events (drought) experienced by the municipality, can also be included.
Instruct the participants to indicate in the table, through checkmarks, the Table 4: Hazard
Susceptibility Inventory Matrix the hazards that have affected and that may affect Ba-
rangays regardless of the degree of impact or frequency of the hazard.
Allot 2 weeks for the validation of the results of Step 1 before proceeding to Step 2 of CDRA process.
Scope the potential impacts of climate
change and hazard
STEP
This step summarizes the initial scoping of potential hazards affecting the locality, including the
associated impacts of climate change. These are based on the findings from the initial scoping
2
of climate trends, climate change, and compilation of hazard maps. This involves identifying
various climate stimuli from climate trends, climate change projections, and hazards that will
likely affect the municipality and the chain of direct and indirect impacts that may likely affect the
various systems of interest and development sectors.
Based on the projected changes in the mean climate variables identified in Table 1 of Step 1,
derive the relevant climatic stimuli that would likely affect the locality and systems of interest.
The systems of interest include Population, Natural Resources, Critical Facilities, Urban Use,
and Infrastructures and Utilities.
Climate change stimuli refer to the general changes expected in the climate. These include
changes in seasonal temperature and rainfall, number of dry days, sea level rise, and number
of days with extreme temperatures.
Impact chains provide the most important chains of cause and effect leading to the potential
impacts relevant in the planning area. This can help identify the key development areas/
sectors where climate change and disasters will likely impact and guide the detailed study of
establishing the level of risks and vulnerabilities of the area.
Based on the identified climate stimuli (including the potentially affected systems of inter-
ests), ask the participants to identify the potential direct and indirect impacts of the cli-
mate stimuli to the various sectors or systems of interest. Formulate impact chain analysis
for each of the systems of interest per climate stimulus per hazard (refer to Figure 2 for
climate-related hazards) or per hazard (Refer to Figure 3 for geologic hazards).
3 Summarize findings
At the end of this task, the participants will have an initial scoping of the potential
manifestations of climate change and the various direct and indirect impacts to the relevant
planning sectors and systems of interest. This will facilitate the identification of relevant
sectors in the city/municipality which will be covered in the climate and disaster risk
assessment.
Given that the climate stimuli and the sectors and systems of interest potentially to be af-
fected have been identified and analyzed through impact chains, ask the participants to
enumerate and summarize how the various climate stimuli or hazard will impact the
systems of interest sectors. Table 5: Climate Change Impacts is provided for the results.
Develop the Exposure Database
STEP
The Exposure Database provides baseline information pertaining to 3
the elements at risk. Elements at risk refer to population, assets,
structures, economic activities, and environmental resources which
are located in areas exposed to potential impacts of climate change
and damaging hazard events.
The exposure data shall provide the location, vulnerability/sensitivity
and adaptive capacity attributes of the exposed elements which are
necessary information when conducting Step 4: Climate Change
Vulnerability Assessment (CCVA) and Step 5: Disaster Risk
Assessment (DRA).
Ideally, each element must be geo-referenced and accordingly
What are the Outputs?
reflected on a map. This will facilitate overlay with hazard maps and
maps depicting impacts of climate change, such as sea level rise, 1. Exposure and Sensitivity Database
which will be the basis in estimating the exposed elements expressed 2. Attribute information on exposure,
in terms of area, number and/or unit cost. sensitivity/adaptive capacity of the
various exposure elements
The HLURB Supplemental Guidelines on Mainstreaming CDRA in the 3. Base (Exposure) Map
CLUP is primarily focused on the analysis of the exposed units in
terms of population, urban use area, natural resource-based
production, critical point facilities, and lifeline utilities. Other area– or
element-based information should also be gathered to establish the
sensitivity/vulnerability and adaptive capacity of the exposed elements
which will be the basis for estimating the levels of risk and
vulnerability.
M/CEO Type of roofing materials of school buildings (asphalt, wood, metal, vinyl, rolled)
The exposure database should be map-based; however, data can be generated from the barangay level (through
ground truthing). The exposure database for CDRA will make use Tables 6.1 to 6.5 to cover all the systems of interest.
Prepare a base map of population, shelter/settlement, infrastructures including lifelines and critical facilities
(health, schools, and sports and recreation, roads and bridges, watershed), central business centers, crops
fisheries and livestock, and other elements that may be identified by the LGU.
Instruct the LGUs to prepare a base map before the conduct of Step 3. Separate base maps
for population, natural resources, urban use, critical facilities and lifeline infrastructures
should be produced.
Using the base maps produced and the available data gathered, instruct the participants to derive the
information (exposure indicators) required as indicated in the Exposure column (Column B) of the
exposure database.
After indicating the exposure information, determine the sensitivity of the systems of interest of the locality. Sensitivity
implies the characteristics and conditions that make the exposed elements easily affected.
Ask the participants to supply the Column C (Sensitivity) of the exposure database using the given
indicators.
The facilitator/s may ask the LGU point If the information will be supplied in
persons to supply the exposure database advance, the workshop for Step 3 can
to shorten the duration of the writeshop. devoted to the validation of maps and
The base maps can also be prepared the exposure database. Given this
beforehand with the assistance of GIS scenario, the facilitator can proceed to
expert/s if available. Step 4.
Gather indicators related to adaptive capacity of the exposed elements
2
Adaptive capacity is the ability of a system to adjust to climate change (including climate variability and extremes) to
moderate potential damages, to take advantage of opportunities, or to cope with the consequences. It is the
combination of abilities and efforts in both physical elements (infrastructure, material wealth, technology) and social/
institutional elements (human/social capital including information, governance/institutional strength) to adapt to climate
Ask the participants to evaluate the adaptive capacity of the LGU given the exposed elements and
sensitivities of the barangays and the city/municipality, using the following six (6) dimensions:
Instruct the participants to summarize the findings in the Adaptive Capacity Column (Column D).
Step 4 Process
The impact area reflects the spatial extent of the potential effect of the climate stimuli. Climate stimuli might affect a
number of barangays or could be the entire city or municipality.
Using Table 7. Impact Area and Climate Stimuli, instruct the participants to derive the climate
stimuli identified in Step 2. Determine the impact area in Column B.
Ask the participants to identify the systems of interest (population, natural resources, urban use
areas and infrastructures) and the sectors that are going to be affected by the climate stimuli in
Columns C and D of Table 7.
An impact area can be mapped out to represent the areas of coverage and to facilitate the identification of exposed
units. The impact area map is a map similar to a hazard map but shows areas that are could potentially be affected by
climate stimuli such as sea level rise and increase in the number of dry days.
Using the base maps collected in Step 1 or the exposure maps produced in Step 3, instruct the
C/MPDC and GIS staff, or tap GIS experts if available, to generate impact area maps of the climate
stimuli for every potentially affected system of interest. There should be separate map for every
hazard brought by climate stimuli (i.e sea level rise) on population, natural resources, urban use
areas and infrastructure.
The participants may overlay the exposure maps (in Step 3) and the Impact Area Map to have a better view
of the exposed units. Based on the overlay of the map, identify the exposed elements for each system of
interest. The exposed elements shall be indicated in the Exposure Column (Column B) and Sensitivity Col-
umn (Column C) of the following Tables:
Evaluate the various adaptive capacities of the systems of interest by referring to the adaptive capacity indica-
tors in the exposure database (Step 3). These indicators of adaptive capacities can describe whether the system
is able to accommodate or cope with the impacts with very minimal disruption or short to long term detrimental
effects/impacts.
Evaluate the various adaptive capacities of the systems of interest by referring to the adaptive capacity indicators Evaluate
the various adaptive capacities of the systems of interest by referring to the adaptive capacity indicators in Column D.
4 Rate the Degree of Impact
The impact rating represents the level and kind of impacts the system is likely to experience, and time and resources needed for
interventions to return to pre-impact levels.
Based on the exposure data, the degree of sensitivities of the exposed units, and identified potential impacts, qualitatively
determine the degree of impact. The participants will be assigned to rate the Degree of Impact in Column E using the de-
gree of impact scoring and description (see table below).
The facilitator may divide that participants into groups to facilitate scoring.
Degree of
Degree of
Impact Description
Impact
Score
Estimated direct impacts in terms of number of fatalities, injuries and value of property damage will be
disastrous given the extent of exposure and current sensitivity of the system. Medium to long term indi-
High 3
rect impacts will also be experienced which may affect development processes. Significant costs needed
to return to pre-impact
Moderate direct impacts in terms of terms of number of fatalities, injuries and value of property damage
are expected given the extent of exposure and current sensitivities of the system. Short to medium term
Moderate 2
indirect impacts will also be experienced which may affect development processes. Medium to low cost
needed to return to pre-impact levels within a short to medium time period.
Estimated direct and indirect impacts are low to negligible which can be felt within a short term period.
Low 1 Minimal impacts to development processes and no significant cost needed to return to pre-impact levels.
Similar to the process of assigning the degree of impact score, instruct the participants to qualitatively as-
sign the adaptive capacity score for each element exposed in Column F using the suggested scoring system
below.
Degree of Adaptive
Adaptive Capacity Description
Capacity Rating
The system is not exible to accommodate changes in the climate. Addressing the impacts will be costly.
Low 3
The LGU and property owners will require external assistance to address the impacts.
Addressing the impacts will require signi cant cost but it is still within the capacity of the system to adapt
Moderate 2 to potential impacts. It can accommodate within its resources the cost for adapting and mitigating im-
pacts.
The system is able to accommodate changes in climate. There are adaptation measures in place to ad-
High 1
dress impacts.