Wholeissue 48 2
Wholeissue 48 2
February/février 2022
Crux Mathematicorum is a problem-solving journal at the secondary and university undergraduate levels,
published online by the Canadian Mathematical Society. Its aim is primarily educational; it is not a research
journal. Online submission:
https://publications.cms.math.ca/cruxbox/
Crux Mathematicorum est une publication de résolution de problèmes de niveau secondaire et de premier
cycle universitaire publiée par la Société mathématique du Canada. Principalement de nature éducative,
le Crux n’est pas une revue scientifique. Soumission en ligne:
https://publications.cms.math.ca/cruxbox/
The Canadian Mathematical Society grants permission to individual readers of this publication to copy articles for
their own personal use.
c CANADIAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY 2022. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
ISSN 1496-4309 (Online)
La Société mathématique du Canada permet aux lecteurs de reproduire des articles de la présente publication à des
fins personnelles uniquement.
Editorial Board
Crux Mathematicorum
Founding Editors / Rédacteurs-fondateurs: Léopold Sauvé & Frederick G.B. Maskell
Former Editors / Anciens Rédacteurs: G.W. Sands, R.E. Woodrow, Bruce L.R. Shawyer,
Shawn Godin
Crux Mathematicorum
with Mathematical Mayhem
Former Editors / Anciens Rédacteurs: Bruce L.R. Shawyer, James E. Totten, Václav Linek,
Shawn Godin
60/ Upcoming special issue in memory of Bruce Shawyer
MATHEMATTIC
No. 32
The problems in this section are intended for students at the secondary school level.
MA157. The four sides and one diagonal of a quadrilateral have lengths 1,
2, 2.8, 5 and 7.5, not necessarily in that order. Determine which number was the
length of the diagonal.
.................................................................
Les problèmes proposés dans cette section sont appropriés aux étudiants de l’école sec-
ondaire.
Pour faciliter l’examen des solutions, nous demandons aux lecteurs de les faire parvenir
au plus tard le 1 mai 2022.
MA156. Dans une certaine garderie, les 17 enfants ont produit un nombre
pair de cartes postales. Tout ensemble de 5 enfants a produit au plus 25 cartes
postales, tandis que tout ensemble de 3 enfants a produit au moins 14 cartes
postales. Déterminer le nombre total de cartes produites en cette garderie.
MA157. Les quatre côtés et une des diagonales d’un certain quadrilatère ont
les longueurs 1, 2, 2.8, 5 et 7.5, mais pas nécessairement dans cet ordre. Déterminer
lequel de ces nombres représente la diagonale de ce quadrilatère.
MATHEMATTIC
SOLUTIONS
Statements of the problems in this section originally appear in 2021: 47(7), p. 326–328.
MA131. Prove that there are infinitely many positive integers k such that
k k can be expressed as the sum of the cubes of two positive integers.
Originally from 2009 Alberta High School Mathematics Competition, Part II, prob-
lem 5.
We received 11 submissions of which 10 were correct and complete. We present
the solution by Richard Hess, slightly edited.
Suppose that k = a3 + b3 for positive integers a and b and that k ≡ 1 (mod 3). In
this case, write k = 3m + 1 for m a positive integer, and note that
k + (k + 1) + · · · + (k + m) = (k + m + 1) + (k + m + 2) + · · · + (k + 2m).
Rearranging gives
(m + 1)k + (1 + 2 + · · · + m) = mk + (1 + 2 + · · · + m) + m2 ,
making k = m2 . Hence for each positive integer m there exists exactly one set
satisfying the property, namely {m2 , m2 + 1, . . . , m2 + 2m}.
x2 − 2x + 29 = 7x y.
Originally question 2 of The π Quiz 2017, Round 8 by the Irish Maths Teachers’
Association.
Let B, H, R represent all students of the group that played basketball, hockey,
rugby, respectively. According to the following Venn diagram
18 − x
8
x 10 R
4
20 − x
16 + x
(18 − x) + (20 − x) + 10 24 − x
the required probability is i.e., . We are told also
80 40
that 16 + x = 2x, which gives x = 16.
24 − 16
Thus, the required probability is = 0.2
40
we obtain
S−A=E
E−T −1=A
T −E+9=S
A − S + 10 = T.
E + T = 10.
A + S = 8.
S=7
and
E = 6.
Hence T = 4 and A = 1 and the problem is solved.
A Mixed Bag
by Raymond Smullyan
ISBN 978-0-9861445-7-8, softcover, 144+ pages
Published by Sagging Meniscus in 2016.
I call Raymond Smullyan, who passed away in 2017 at age 98, a 3M logician (ex-
plained later). He himself regarded Kurt Gödel as the greatest of all logicians.
Indeed, Gödel’s Incompleteness Theorem in 1931 was a major result in metamath-
ematics that shook the foundation of the world of mathematics. Raymond had
devoted his life to disseminating Gödel’s idea to the general public in an ingenious,
illuminating and invigorating manner.
This is primarily done through a sequence of eleven books of logic puzzles. In
order of publication, they are:
[1] What is the Name of this Book?
[2] The Lady or the Tiger?
[3] Alice in Puzzleland.
[4] To Mock a Mocking Bird.
[5] Forever Undecided.
[6] Satan, Cantor, and Infinity.
[7] The Riddles of Scheherazade.
[8] Logical Labyrinth.
[9[ King Arthur in Search of his Dog.
[10] The Gödelian Puzzle Book.
[11] The Magic Garden of George B.
A Mixed Bag consists of largely a collection of personal reminiscences: how he got
married to the musician Blanche, how he got hired by the prestigious Dartmouth
College before he even had a bachelor’s degree, how he got that degree from the
University of Chicago on the strength of courses he never took but had taught,
how he met Kurt Gödel at the Institute of Advanced Studies, and so on. Many of
The answers to these puzzles are given in the book, which also has many stories,
often with a philosophical bent. Here is one of them.
A monk came up the mountain to interview the Master, who asked him whether
he came from the North or the South. “The South,” was the reply. “In that case,”
said the Master, “have a cup of tea.” The next morning, another monk came
up the mountain for an interview, and the Master likewise asked him whether he
came from the North or the South. This time, the monk said he had come from
the North. “In that case,” said the Master, “have a cup of tea.” Later on, the
Master’s assistant said to him: “I don’t understand, Master; you told one that
since he was from the South, he should have a cup of tea, and the other, that since
he was from the North, he should have a cup of tea. How come?” The Master
replied: “Have a cup of tea.”
The book ended with another such story.
A certain great Sage in the East was reputed to be the wisest man in the world.
A philosopher heard about him and was anxious to meet him. It took him fifteen
years to find him, but when he finally did, he asked him: “What is the best
question that can be asked, and what is the best answer that can be given?” The
great Sage replied: “The best question that can be asked is the question you have
asked, and the best answer that can be given is the answer I am now giving.”
The review was provided by Andy Liu. Andy ran a Mathematical Circle for Ed-
monton upper elementary and junior high students from 1981 to 2012. He has
given lectures to students in six continents. He has been the vice-president of the
International Mathematics Tournament of the Towns since 1992. He had been in-
volved in various capacities in the International Mathematical Olympiad from 1981
to 2016. He regularly attended the International Puzzle Party and the Gathering
for Gardner from 1991 to 2018. Andy was involved with Crux Editorial Board as
a Book Review editor from 1990 to 1998. He has authored eighteen mathematics
books so far, and edited several others.
TEACHING PROBLEMS
No.15
Margo Kondratieva
Basic geometric configurations: Which one do you see?
.................................................................
Teaching Problems usually features problems that have been integrated into the
teaching experiences of the contributors. This issue is a little different in that
the experience with a problem in a math contest suggests its potential merit as
one to be incorporated into teaching. The example draws forth a range of meth-
ods of solution as well as identifying links to different known geometrical results.
Others involved in math contests may wish to share such examples from their ex-
periences in future issues. Contributions to Teaching Problems are welcomed via
[email protected].
.................................................................
5 B
P
2
[P XY ] =?
X Y
The BGC “Pythagorean theorem” allows us to find one side √ in a right triangle if
two other sides are known. Thus, we find the length |XY | = 125 from the right
triangle XAY and then the length of |XB| = 11 from the right triangle XBY . In
order to use the theorem one needs to focus on the relevant part of the figure and
ignore the rest, as illustrated in Figure 2.
√ B
10 125 − 22 = 11
5
2
X √ √ Y X √ Y
52 + 102 = 125 125
Another well known BGC depicts the fact that the area of a triangle is equal to
“a half of base times height”. Drop the height from P on XY . Call the foot D.
Then we have
1 1 1
[P XY ] = |XY | · |P D| = |XP | · |BY | = |Y P | · |AX|
2 2 2
5 B
P
2
X D Y
√ √
Since we know |XY | = 125 = 5 5, |AX| = 5 and |BY | = 2, the problem then
reduces to finding the length of either |P D| or |XP | or |Y P |.
Below we consider six different solutions of the problem, each of which is related
to a more sophisticated BGC. We start with presenting three methods of finding
|P D|.
L0
M0
P
M L
K0
Figure 4a: BGCs depicting properties of the heights in acute and right triangles.
BGC 1: The ratio of two heights in an acute triangle is equal to the ratio of the
lengths from the feet of these heights to the third vertex of the triangle:
|KK 0 | |M K 0 |
0
= . (1)
|LL | |M L0 |
|KK 0 | |LL0 |
tan(∠L0 M K 0 ) = =
|M K 0 | |M L0 |
0 0
|KK | |LK |
Proof: Relation (2) is equivalent to |M K 0 | = |P K 0 | . The latter is true because
∠P KL = ∠P LK , as indicated in Figure 4a, and so cot(∠P KL0 ) = cot(∠P LK 0 ).
0 0
M L
K0
The facts (1) and (2) become useful for solving our problem if we identify the
points M, L, L0 , M 0 with the points X, Y, A, B respectively. By extending XA
and Y B we obtain the point of intersection K. Point K 0 = D is the foot of the
perpendicular dropped from P on XY .
K
|AY | = 10
|BX| = 11
A
B
P
5
2
X Y
D
Figure 5: Setting up our problem for the application of BGC 1 and BGC 2.
and hence
1
|XD| = |KD|.
2
Similarly,
|KD| |Y D| 2
= ⇒ |Y D| = |KD|.
|XB| |Y B| 11
Then,
1 2 15
Å ã
|XD| + |Y D| = + |KD| = |KD|.
2 11 22
√
|XD|·|Y D| 2 5
Now from BGC 2, |P D| = |KD| = 3 . Therefore
1 25
[XP Y ] = |XY | · |P D| = .
2 3
Method 2. The following fact relates the vertical segments depicted in Figure 6.
S
P
X D Y
BGC 3: Let RXY and SXY be two right triangles for which leg XY is shared
and the hypotenuses intersect at P . Let P D be perpendicular to XY . Then
1 1 1
= + . (3)
|P D| |RX| |SY |
|Y D| |XY |
Proof: Since P DY and RXY are similar right triangles, we have |P D| = |RX| .
|XD| |XY |
Since P DX and SY X are similar right triangles, we have |P D| = |SY | . Therefore,
Thus, we obtain
|XY | |XY | |XY |
+ = .
|RX| |SY | |P D|
Dividing through by |XY | gives the required relation.
This BGC leads to the following solution of our problem.
Solution 2: Extend Y A to intersect at R with the line perpendicular to XY
through X, as shown. Likewise let S be the intersection of XB (extended beyond
B) with the line perpendicular to XY through Y in figure 7.
R
|AY | = 10
A
|BX| = 11
5 B S
P
2
X D Y
In the right triangle RXY , the segment XA is the height dropped to the hy-
potenuse RY . From BGC 20 we have the relation |XA|2 = |RA| · |AY |. Thus,
|RA| = 52 /10 = 5/2. Applying the Pythagorean theorem to right triangle XAR
yields … √
25 5 5 25
|RX| = 25 + = = √ .
4 2 2 5
BGC 20 applied to the right triangle SXY gives |Y 2
»B| = |SB| · √
|BX|, so |SB| =
16
4/11. Then from the right triangle Y BS, |SY | = 4 + 121 = 11 = 1150
10 5 √ .
5
Method 3. This approach is based on a BGC depicting two right triangles that
share an acute angle in the following way.
K
M L
D
∆M P D ∼ ∆M LK
Solution 3: Let |P D| = h.
A
|AY | = 10
|BX| = 11
5 B
P
h 2
X 11
2 h
D 2h Y
√
|XY | = 5 5
|XD| |P D| |XD| h
= ⇒ =
|XB| |Y B| 11 2
11
and hence |XD| = 2 h. Similarly, triangles Y P D and Y XA are similar by BGC
4 which yields,
|Y D| |P D| |Y D| h
= ⇒ =
|Y A| |XA| 10 5
Then
11 15
|XD| + |Y D| = h + 2h = h.
2 2
On the other hand,
√
|XD| + |Y D| = |XY | = 5 5,
therefore,
√
2 √ 2 5
h= 5 5= = |P D|.
15 3
One may identify a geometric configuration involving another pair of similar right
triangles.
B
P
X Y
∆XAP ∼ ∆Y BP
Recognition of this BGC may yet lead to different solutions that use distinct
properties and relations in similar triangles. We present three of them below.
Solution 4: Triangles XAP and Y BP are similar by BGC 5. Then, since the ratio
5 2
of the sides is |AX| 5 [XAP ]
|BY | = 2 we can deduce that the ratio of the areas is [Y BP ] = 2 .
Thus, [XAP ] = 25 4 [Y BP ].
25
[XY A] = [P XY ] + [XAP ] = x + y
4
[XY B] = [P XY ] + [Y BP ] = x + y.
5 25 B
4 y P
y 2
x
X Y
25
x+ y = 25
4
x + y = 11
25
Solving the system we get x = 3 and y = 83 . Thus, the desired area is 25
3 square
units.
Solution 5:
A |AY | = 10
|BX| = 11
5u
5 2u B
P
5v 2v 2
X Y
x
2x
5 5 B
P
2
10 − x
X Y
Closing comments
Considering the range of solution methods is there one that spoke to you as being
most appealing? Was it an aspect of the presentation or the geometrical ideas in
play or some other element that resonated with your problem-solving style?
Note that solutions 1, 2, and 3 require solving a linear equation, while solutions 4
and 5 require solving a system of linear equations and solution 6 requires solving
a quadratic equation. Solution 3 is probably the most “economical” which gives
an advantage in a competition setting, especially if calculators are not allowed.
However, each solution highlights an interesting point of view and is valuable for
making mathematical connections. Do you have yet another way of solving this
problem?
.................................................................
OLYMPIAD CORNER
No. 400
The problems featured in this section have appeared in a regional or national mathematical
Olympiad.
OC566. Prove that if a and b are real numbers such that a + b > 2, then
OC567. In a group of people, there are some mutually friendly pairs. For
a positive integer k ≥ 3, we say that the group is k-good if every k people in the
group can be seated around a round table so that every two neighbors are mutually
friends. Prove that if the group is 6-good, then it is also 7-good.
.................................................................
Les problèmes présentés dans cette section ont déjà été présentés dans le cadre d’une
olympiade mathématique régionale ou nationale.
Pour faciliter l’examen des solutions, nous demandons aux lecteurs de les faire parvenir
au plus tard le 1 mai 2022.
OC566. Démontrer que si a et b sont des nombres réels tels que a + b > 2,
alors
(a − 1)x + b < x2 < ax + (b − 1)
pour un nombre infini de réels x.
OC569. Soit ABC un triangle tel que ∠A = 80◦ et ∠C = 30◦ ; soit aussi M
un point à l’intérieur du triangle, tel que ∠M AC = 60◦ et ∠M CA = 20◦ . Si N est
le point d’intersection des lignes BM et AC, démontrer que M N est bissectrice
de ∠AM C.
OLYMPIAD CORNER
SOLUTIONS
Statements of the problems in this section originally appear in 2021: 47(7), p. 338–339.
So
∠DAB = 360◦ − 2(ϑ + ϕ) = 2(180◦ − ∠BCD) = ∠DOB .
So A, O, B, D belong on the same circle, say ω. Let A0 be the other point of
intersection of AC with ω. Since AC is the angle bisector of ∠DAB, then A0
belongs on the perpendicular bisector of BD. But so does O, as OB = OD. Thus
OA0 is a diameter of ω and so OA ⊥ AC as required.
−c(|b|2 − |c|2 )
u= .
bc − bc
c(|α|2 − 1) c(|α|2 − 1)
αuc + αuc = αc + αc = |c|2 (|α|2 − 1)
α−α α−α
hence |u − c|2 = |u − αc|2 holds and we are done.
Originally from 2018 Italy Math Olympiad, 3rd Problem, Final Round.
We received 6 correct solutions. We present two solutions.
Solution 1, by Oliver Geupel.
Let us say that the positive integer x reduces to the positive integer y, if y =
bx/10c. We write x → y if x reduces to y. Observe that the positive integer x ”is
or equivalently
d2 dN
d1 + + · · · + N −1 ≤ 1 .
10 10
This is actually an immediate application of Kraft’s inequality but we chose to
spell out the proof as it is not that known in Olympiad circles.
Now we observe that each m-digit number beginning with k is at least 10m k and
so contributes at most 101m k in the required sum. So the total contribution of the
xi ’s beginning with k is at most
d1 d2 dN 1
+ + · · · + N −1 ≤
k 10k 10 k k
Therefore
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3
+···+ < 1+ + +···+ = 2+ + + + + < 2+ + < 3.
x1 xn 2 3 9 4 5 7 8 9 4 7
OC543. There are 50 cards in a box with the first 100 positive integers
written on them. That is, the first card has number 1 on one side and number 2
on the other side, the second card has number 3 on one side and number 4 on the
other, and so on up to the 50-th card which has number 99 on one side and 100
on the other side. Eliza takes four cards out of the box and calculates the sum of
the eight numbers written on them. How many distinct sums can Eliza get?
Originally from 2018 Romania Math Olympiad, 4th Problem, Grade 5, District
Round.
We received 5 submissions, of which 4 were correct and complete. We present the
solution by Oliver Geupel.
We show that the answer is 185.
For 1 ≤ n ≤ 50, the sum of the two numbers written on the card with number n
is (2n − 1) + 2n = 4n − 1. Hence, the sum of the eight numbers written on four
distinct cards with numbers i, j, k, and ` is 4(i + j + k + ` − 1). We have
10 = 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 ≤ i + j + k + ` ≤ 47 + 48 + 49 + 50 = 194.
Thus, Eliza cannot get more than 194 − 9 = 185 distinct sums.
It remains to show that the sum s = i + j + k + ` can attain every integer value
in the range from 10 to 194.
If s = 4n where 3 ≤ n ≤ 48, then we put {i, j, k, `} = {n − 2, n − 1, n + 1, n + 2}.
If s = 4n + 1 where 3 ≤ n ≤ 48, we take {i, j, k, `} = {n − 2, n, n + 1, n + 2}.
If s = 4n + 2 where 2 ≤ n ≤ 48}, put {i, j, k, `} = {n − 1, n, n + 1, n + 2}.
Finally, if s = 4n + 3 where 2 ≤ n ≤ 47, then {i, j, k, `} = {n − 1, n, n + 1, n + 3}
does the job.
A−1 −1 −1
1 + A2 + · · · + An = (A1 + A2 + · · · + An )
−1
.
Originally 2018 Romania Math Olympiad, 1st Problem, Grade 11, District Round.
We received 6 correct solutions. We present 2 solutions.
Solution 1, by Michel Bataille.
Å ã
ba
Let S be the set of all matrices such that a, b, c, d, a + b, c + d, ad − bc are
d c
Å ã
0 −1
nonzero real numbers and let C = .
1 −1
Å ã Å ã
−1 1 1 0
Note that C −1 = = −C − I2 where I2 = is the unit matrix.
−1 0 0 1
Pick any A1 in S. It is readily checked that A2 = A1 C and
A1 + A2 = A1 (I2 + C) = −A1 C −1
and
A−1 −1 −1
1 + A2 = A1 + C
−1 −1
A1 = (I2 + C −1 )A−1 −1
1 = −CA1 .
A−1 −1 −1
1 + A2 + · · · + An = (A1 + A2 + · · · + An )
−1
.
This completes the induction step and the answer to the problem.
(A1 + A2 + . . . + An )(A−1 −1 −1
1 + A2 + . . . + An ) = I 2 .
(A + (n − 1)B)(A−1 + (n − 1)B −1 ) = I2 .
I2 + (n − 1)(X + X −1 ) + (n − 1)2 I2 = I2 ,
that is,
X + X −1 + (n − 1)I2 = O2 ,
i.e.
X 2 + (n − 1)X + I2 = O2 .
The matrix Å ã
1 n+1
X=
−1 −n
satisfies this equation because tr(X) = −(n − 1) and det(X) = 1 by the Cayley-
Hamilton theorem. Now, choose
Å ã
2 1
A=
1 1
and then
Å ãÅ ã Å ã
1 n+1 2 1 n+3 n+2
B = XA = = .
−1 −n 1 1 −n − 2 −n − 1
Originally from 2018 Poland Math Olympiad, 3rd Problem, First Round.
We received 11 submissions of which 10 were correct and complete. We present
the solution by Oliver Geupel.
A straightforward check shows that (−1, −1, −1), (1, 1, 1), and (2, 2, 2) are solu-
tions for (x, y, z). We show that there are no other solutions. Let us refer to the
given equations as to (1), (2), and (3).
Rearrange the terms to get
It follows that
Here we aim to demystify this problem, and, if not exactly explain its solution, at
least situate it in its proper mathematical context.
A partition of a positive integer n is a sequence λ = (λ1 , λ2 , . . . , λk ) of integers
satisfying λ1 ≥ λ2 ≥ · · · ≥ λk > 0 and λ1 + λ2 + · · · + λk = n. For example,
λ = (4, 2, 2, 1) is a partition of 9. Associated to any partition is its Young diagram:
the left- and top-justified array of boxes which has λi boxes in the ith row. The
Young diagram of (4, 2, 2, 1) is
1 3 5 8
2 4
6 9
7
Young diagrams and tableaux are named after Alfred Young (1873–1940), a British
mathematician who pioneered the study of the group of permutations of a finite
set. Much is known about SYTs because of their connection to algebra. For
instance, there is a beautiful formula for the number of SYTs of given shape. The
hook of a box u in a Young diagram consists of all boxes directly below, or directly
to the right of, that box, including the box itself. The hook length of a box is the
number of boxes in its hook. For example, the box with entry 2 in the above SYT
has a hook length of 4. The celebrated hook length formula says that the number
of SYTs of shape λ, a partition of n, is
n!
Y ,
h(u)
u
where the product runs over all boxes u of the Young diagram of λ, and h(u) is the
hook length of the box u. So for example there are 9!/(7 · 5 · 4 · 3 · 2 · 2 · 1 · 1 · 1) = 216
SYTs of shape (4, 2, 2, 1). To learn more about tableaux in general, see Yong’s
short note [3] or Sagan’s survey [1].
Our present interest in SYTs lies not in their enumeration but rather in a certain
operation on them, which we now explain using a somewhat fanciful analogy.
We can view a Young diagram as a building whose rooms are the boxes of the
diagram. (This presents some engineering challenges because the rows get longer
towards the top, but never mind that.) If this building belongs to a hierarchical
organization, like a company, then we can view a filling of the Young diagram with
numbers 1, 2 . . ., as an assignment of rooms to the person of rank 1, the person of
rank 2, and so on. Suppose that to the left of our Young diagram office building
is a beautiful ocean. Naturally, everyone in the building wants to have the best
view of this ocean, and hence would always prefer to have a room as much to the
left (to be closer to the ocean) and above (to have a higher viewpoint) as possible.
So, in order to respect the pecking order, we might require room assignments to
be such that every person has a lesser rank than the people in the rooms to their
left and above them. Room assignments like this are precisely SYTs.
But now suppose that the CEO (the person of rank 1) leaves the company for
a better opportunity elsewhere. Their departure creates an opening in a very
desirable room. Those of lesser rank will fill this opening. Since the company does
not want people moving their stuff a long way across the building, only the people
whose rooms are adjacent, either to the right or below, can compete to fill that
open room. Of course, among these two, the room is awarded to the person of
greater rank. They move from their current room to the more desirable one, and in
doing so they create a new room opening, which is filled in the same manner: with
the people currently adjacent to the right and below competing. In this way the
departure of the CEO causes a series of room re-assignments, which eventually
terminates with an undesirable room at the bottom-right of the building being
emptied. Then, two final things happen to complete the corporate restructuring.
First, everyone in the building gets a “promotion,” meaning that the person of
rank 2 becomes rank 1, the person of rank 3 becomes rank 2, and so on. And
second, a new intern, of the least rank n, gets hired to fill the empty room.
Here is an example of this procedure:
1 3 5 8 • 3 5 8 2 3 5 8 2 3 5 8
2 4 1 leaves 2 4 2 upgrades • 4 4 upgrades 4 •
−−−−−→ −−−−−−−→ −−−−−−−→ ···
6 9 6 9 6 9 6 9
7 7 7 7
2 3 5 8 1 2 4 7 1 2 4 7
9 upgrades 4 9 promotions 3 8 n is hired 3 8
· · · −−−−−−−→ −−−−−−−→ −−−−−−→
6 • 5 • 5 9
7 6 6
This entire operation, which takes one SYT of shape λ to another one, is in fact
called promotion. The promotion operation on tableaux was introduced, together
with another closely related operation called evacuation, by M.P. Schützenberger1 .
The sliding process which goes into the definition of both promotion and evacuation
was termed jeu de taquin by Schützenberger. “Jeu de taquin” literally translates
to “teasing game,” but is the name in French for what is usually called the “15
Puzzle” in English. For an excellent introduction to promotion and evacuation,
see Stanley’s survey [2].
Promotion is an invertible operation. To see this, we can imagine doing all of
the steps backwards: firing the intern, demoting everyone, and forcing them into
1 The French mathematician Marcel-Paul Schützenberger (1920–1996) had a wide range of
scientific interests: e.g., he obtained a doctorate in medicine in 1948; and in the 1960s he worked
with the famous linguist Noam Chomsky on the analysis of formal languages. In algebraic
combinatorics he is especially remembered for seminal contributions to the theory of tableaux,
symmetric functions, and Schubert calculus.
worse rooms until there is a spot at the top for a new CEO. Hence, for any given
tableau T there must be some number of times we can apply promotion to T that
will get us back to T . But for most shapes, promotion behaves quite chaotically
and it takes a long time for us to get back to where we started. For instance, we
would need to apply promotion 60 times to our running example SYT of shape
(4, 4, 2, 1) in order to return to it. (In contrast, evacuation is always an involution,
meaning if we apply it twice we get back to where we started.)
There are a very small number of partition shapes for which promotion behaves
in an orderly fashion: see [2, §4]. These nice shapes include the rectangle 2
a times
z }| {
a × b := (b, b, . . . , b).
By now the reader may recognize that “The Last Problem” from the June 2021
issue of Crux precisely concerns the promotion operation applied to SYTs of rect-
angular shape3 . Part (a) of the problem asks the reader to show that ab applica-
tions of promotion applied to an SYT T of shape a × b returns the initial tableau
T . There is no really simple proof of this fact: it does follow from the fundamental
properties of jeu de taquin as developed by Schützenberger, but it takes quite a
while to develop this theory. We would be very impressed if any reader submitted
a correct solution to this problem.
Parts (b) and (c) also follow from known properties of promotion: see Theorem
2.3 in [2], which relates the “principal chain” and “trajectory” of a tableau, and
Theorem 4.1(a) of [2], which explains that evacuation for rectangular SYTs is 180◦
rotation plus swapping each number i for n + 1 − i.
Although we were not able to explain the full solution to “‘The Last Problem” in
this short space, we hope that we have inspired the reader to learn more about
tableaux and their fascinating properties, as well as the dynamical operations
defined on them.
2 Shapes that behave well under promotion also include the staircase δ = (n, n − 1, . . . , 1),
n
though understanding promotion for the staircase is even more involved than for the rectangle.
3 But note that the arrays there are 180◦ rotations of SYTs as we defined them here.
References
1. B. E. Sagan, The ubiquitous Young tableau, Invariant theory and tableaux
(Minneapolis, MN, 1988), Volume 19 of IMA Vol. Math. Appl., pp. 262–298,
Springer, New York, 1990. Available online here.
2. R. P. Stanley, Promotion and evacuation, Electron. J. Combin., Volume 16
(2): paper 2.9, 24, 2009. Available online here.
3. A. Yong, What is . . . a Young tableau?, Notices Amer. Math. Soc., 54 (2), pp.
240–241, 2–7. Available online here.
.................................................................
Sam Hopkins
[email protected]
Department of Mathematics, Howard University, Washington, DC
PROBLEMS
Click here to submit problems proposals as well as solutions, comments
and generalizations to any problem in this section.
Un (z)
Evaluate the ratio Vn (z) in closed form.
.................................................................
Pour faciliter l’examen des solutions, nous demandons aux lecteurs de les faire parvenir
au plus tard le 1 mai 2022.
Un (z)
Déterminer le ratio Vn (z) en forme close.
où xn+1 = x1 et n ≥ 3.
SOLUTIONS
No problem is ever permanently closed. The editor is always pleased to consider for
publication new solutions or new insights on past problems.
Statements of the problems in this section originally appear in 2021: 47(7), p. 352–356.
AC 2 − AB 2
MC − MB = .
2BC
The centroids of triangles AM B and AM C are G1 and G2 , respectively. Prove
that A, G1 , M, C are concyclic points if and only if A, B, M, G2 are also concyclic
points.
We received 14 solutions. We present 4 of them here.
Solution 1, by Michel Bataille.
Let BC = a, CA = b, AB = c, as usual, and let M B = u, M C = v (so that
u + v = a). In barycentric coordinates relative to (A, B, C), we have M = (0, v, u)
and G1 = (a : a + v : u) (since 3G1 = A + B + M ) and G2 = (a : v : a + u). We
know that the circle Γ1 through A, M, C has an equation of the form
a2 yz + b2 zx + c2 xy = (x + y + z)(αx + βy + γz).
Expressing that A(1 : 0 : 0), M (0 : v : u), C(0 : 0 : 1) are on this circle, we obtain
that the equation of Γ1 is
a2 yz + b2 zx + c2 xy = auy(x + y + z).
a2 yz + b2 zx + c2 xy = avz(x + y + z).
Denote by a, b, c the lengths of BC, CA, and AB respectively. Let X1 = AG1 ∩BC
and X2 = AG2 ∩ BC. If A, G1 , M , C are concyclic points then
X1 A2
X1 M.X1 C = X1 G1 .X1 A = ⇒ 4X1 A2 = 3.M B.(2a − M B).
3
We also have
b2 + AM 2 = M C.(3a − M C).
But
b2 + AM 2 = M C.(3a − M C) ⇔ c2 + AM 2 = M B.(3a − M B)
because
(b2 + AM 2 ) − (c2 + AM 2 ) = b2 − c2
and
b2 + AM 2 − M C.(3a − M C) = c2 + AM 2 − M B.(3a − M B) = 0.
AC 2 = AB 2 + BC 2 − 2BC · BD.
Therefore,
BC = 2BN = 2(M C − M B + BD)
and thus
M B − BD = M C − BN = M C − CN.
That is, M is the midpoint of DN.
1 DN 2
Å ã Å ã
BM BM BM
FM · FC = AF 2 ⇐⇒ 3 · · + CM = AD2 + −
3 2 2 2 2
⇐⇒ 2BM · (BM + DN ) = 4AD2 + DN 2 − 6CM · BM,
and similarly
1 DN 2
Å ã Å ã
2 CM CM 2 CM
EM · EB = AE ⇐⇒ 3 · · + BM = AD + +
3 2 2 2 2
2 2
⇐⇒ 2CM · (CM − DN ) = 4AD + DN − 6CM · BM.
4ax − c2 = 2a2 − b2
G1 G2
B C
P M Q
P G1 · P A = P M · P C,
that is,
1
Åã
x x
PA · PA = a− , (2)
3 2 2
where, in 4ABM , P A2 = 14 2 AB 2 + AM 2 − BM 2 = 1
2 c2 + AM 2 − x2 .
4
AM 2 = 3ax − c2 − x2 . (3)
QG2 · QA = QM · QB,
that is, Å
1
ã a − x a + x
QA · QA = , (4)
3 2 2
where, in 4AM C,
1 1Ä 2
ä
QA2 = 2 AM 2 + AC 2 − M C 2 = 2 AM 2 + b2 − (a − x) .
4 4
AM 2 = 2a2 − b2 − x (a + x) . (5)
Since, by hypothesis, (1) holds, then (3) and (5) hold simultaneously, and the
conclusion follows.
b2 + c2 − a2 ≥ 0, c2 + a2 − b2 ≥ 0, and a2 + b2 − c2 ≥ 0.
AM 2 BM 2 CM 2
+ 2 + 2
b2 +c −a
2 2 c +a −b2 2 a + b2 − c2
(aAM )2 bBM 2 cCM 2
= + +
(ab) + (ca) − a
2 2 4 (bc) + (ab) − b
2 2 4 (ca) + (bc)2 − c4
2
AM 2 BM 2 CM 2
+ 2 + 2 ≥ 1,
b2 +c −a
2 2 c +a −b
2 2 a + b2 − c 2
we obtain
aAB + bBM + cCM ≥ 4F.
Equality holds when M is the orthocenter of triangle ABC.
AF + BC + DE √
3
√
3
= AB · CD · EF = CB · AF · DE.
3
We received 25 submissions, all of which are correct. We present the similar solu-
tions by Brian Bradie, UCLan Cyprus Solving Group, and Eagle Problem Solvers.
Since
cos x cos x (sinn−1 x)(cos x)
n = − ,
(sin x)(1 + sin x) sin x 1 + sinn x
we have
π/2 ã π/2
cos x 1
Z Å
n
dx = ln sin x − ln(1 + sin x)
π/6 sin x(1 + sinn x) n
π/6
1 1 1 1
Å ã
= − ln 2 − ln + ln 1 + n .
n 2 n 2
Hence,
π/2
ÇZ å
cos x
lim dx = − ln 1/2 = ln 2.
n→∞ π/6 sin x(1 + sinn x)
]N CD = ]N CE + ]ECD = ]A + ]C
we get
]B
]CN D = and hence (1)
2
]C
]DN E = ]CN E − ]CN D = . (2)
2
We repeat the first part of the argument with B, M and E instead of C, N and
F (starting from BM k AE) to get
]C
]DM B = ; (3)
2
we also note that 4BM F ∼ 4CN E.
Combining (2) and (3) we get ]QN E = ]P M B. As angles whose sides are parallel
lines, we also have ]P BM = ]QCE. It follows that the similarity transformation
which maps 4BM F to 4CN E maps P to the isogonal conjugate of Q. Hence
]P F M = ]QEC. From 4F SE, using this observation and the fact that opposite
angles are equal, we calculate
Finally, note that ]AEF = ]F DE (since the intercepted arc on circle I is the
same for both angles). Hence ]F SE = 180◦ − ]F DE, so F SED is a cyclic
quadrilateral. Therefore, S lies on the circle I.
Editor’s comment. It was brought to the attention of the editors that this problem
also appeared as M2672 in Issue 10 (2021) of the Russian magazine Kvant. We take
this opportunity to remind our readers that problems submitted to any journal
should be original and not actively under consideration at another publication.
point on the smaller arc DF , and the line perpendicular to XE passing through I
intersects line BX in point Y . Show that IY is the external angle bisector of the
angle AY C.
We received 5 submissions: two were complete and essentially correct, and another
two correctly proved that the line IY was an angle bisector but did not address the
matter of whether it was internal or external; the fifth was computer aided so it is
hard to determine its status. We feature the solution by Marie-Nicole Gras, with
the final step modified by the editor.
A
F
•
Y
X
E
θ
I B
•
D
We shall prove that, more generally, IY is the internal bisector of ∠AY C when X
is on the arc DF that contains E, and the external bisector on the other (smaller)
arc DF . Let r be the inradius; we denote by ∠A, ∠B and ∠C the value of ∠BAC,
∠CBA and ∠ACB, respectively. Since I is the incenter, we have the equalities:
π ∠B
β :=∠BIF = − ;
2 2
π ∠B π ∠B
α :=∠BIE = − + π − ∠A = + + ∠C.
2 2 2 2
−
→ −→
We introduce cartesian coordinates with the origin at I and axis Ix on IB. We put
−→ −→
θ = ∠(IB, IX); since X is on the smaller arc DF , we have − π2 < β < θ < β < π2 ;
we find
r
B∼ ,0 ,
cos β
E ∼ (r cos α, r sin α), F ∼ (r cos β, r sin β), D ∼ (r cos β, −r sin β),
X ∼ (r cos θ, r sin θ).
I) Coordinates of Y .
Equation of line BX is
r sin θ
y = r2
r sin θ x − r cos θ − ·
cos β cos β
Line `, passing through I and perpendicular to the chord XE, has parametric
equation:
θ+α θ+α
x = t cos , y = t sin ,
2 2
where t is given by
a cos β + a0 sin β = r
®
a cos α + a0 sin α = r;
We notice that
We deduce that
θ+β θ−α 2
4(u2 + v 2 ) sin2 = sin2 θ w + cos sin β + 2 1 − cos θ cos β + sin θ sin β w2
2 2
θ−α
− 2w sin θ w + cos sin β sin θ + sin β
2
θ−α
= sin2 θ w2 + cos2 sin2 β + 2 1 − cos θ cos β w2
2
θ−α
− 2w sin θ w sin θ + cos sin2 β
2
− θ−α
ï ò
θ α
+ 2w sin2 θ cos + 2w2 sin θ − 2w sin θ w + cos sin θ sin β,
2 2
and the coefficient of sin β in the brackets is equal to zero.
IV) Line IY is the bisector of ∠AY C.
All calculations relating to vertex C can be deduced from those obtained with A
by replacing β by −β. Note that the expression for d is invariant if we replace β
by −β. It follows that I is equidistant from lines AY and CY ; consequently, IY
is a bisector of one pair of the angles defined by those two lines. It remains to
prove that it is the external bisector of ∠AY C when X is on the smaller arc DF ,
and the internal bisector when on the larger. The lines AY and CY divide the
plane into four quadrants; as usual, we call the first quadrant that which is defined
by ∠AY C — that is, the first quadrant is the region bounded by the rays Y A
and Y C. The second quadrant is bounded by the rays Y C and −Y A, and so on.
The point I is in the first or third quadrants (making Y I the internal bisector of
∠AY C) if the rotation that takes the ray IA to the ray IY is in the same direction
as the rotation that takes the ray IY to the ray IC. The point I is in the second
or fourth quadrants if those two rotations are in opposite directions. The sense
a a0 z z0
of the rotations is given by the sign of the determinants 0 and ,
z z c c0
namely,
r sin θ θ+α α+β α+β θ+α
Å ã
0 0 r
az − a z = sin cos − sin cos
cos α−β
2
w 2 2 2 2
r2 sin θ θ−β
= sin ,
w cos α−β
2
2
r2 sin θ θ+β
zc0 − z 0 c = −(cz 0 − c0 z) = − α+β
sin .
w cos 2 2
π ∠B π ∠B
Since β = 2 − 2 and α = 2 + 2 + ∠C, we have
α−β B+C π A
= = −
2 2 2 2
α+β π+C π C
= = + ;
2 2 2 2
α−β α+β
We deduce that cos cos < 0, which clearly does not depend on θ.
2 2
When −β < θ < β (where X is on the small arc DF as in the original statement
of the problem), we have
β−θ β+θ 1
sin sin = cos θ − cos β > 0.
2 2 2
It follows that (az 0 − a0 z)(zc0 − z 0 c) < 0, and I is in the second or fourth quadrant,
whence IY is the external bisector of ∠AY C. Otherwise, when θ > β or θ < −β,
(az 0 − a0 z)(zc0 − z 0 c) > 0, I is in the first or third quadrant, and IY is the internal
angle bisector.
For a given positive integer n, a 4n×4n table is partitioned into 16n2 unit squares,
each of which is coloured in one of 4 given colours. A set of four cells is called
colourful if the centers of the cells form a rectangle with sides parallel to the sides
of the table, and the cells are coloured in all four different colours. Determine the
maximum number of colourful sets.
In a given row, suppose that there are bk cells with colour k, so that
b1 + b2 + b3 + b4 = 4n.
Then the number of pairs of cells in that row with different colours is
b1 b2 + b1 b3 + b1 b4 + b2 b3 + b2 b4 + b3 b4
(b1 + b2 + b3 + b4 )2 − (b21 + b22 + b23 + b24 )
=
2
(4n)2 − (b21 + b22 + b23 + b24 ) 16n2 − (1/4)(b1 + b2 + b3 + b4 )2
= ≤
2 2
16n2 − 4n2 2
= = 6n .
2
Hence the number of pairs of cells lying in the same row of the table with different
colours is not greater than (4n)(6n2 ) = 24n3 .
Fix a pair (i, j) of indices and let there be mij pairs of cells in the same row, one
in each of columns i and j, with different colours. Let a1 , a2 , a3 , a4 , a5 , a6 be the
number of pairs for which the colours are, respectively, (1, 2), (3, 4), (1, 3), (2, 4),
(1, 4), (2, 3). Then the number of colourful sets in these two columns is
a + a 2 a + a 2 a + a 2
1 2 3 4 5 6
a1 a2 + a3 a4 + a5 a6 ≤ + +
2 2 2
a + a + a + a + a + a 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 m2ij
≤ = .
2 4
The total number of colorful sets does not exceed
1X 2
{mij : 1 ≤ i, j ≤ 4n}.
4
The
P quantities mij are subject to the constraints mij ≤ 4n for each (i, j) and
mij ≤ 24n3 .
In obtaining an upper bound for mij , we can systematically use the following
P
procedure for replacing pairs {u, v} of summands, where u ≥ v, by pairs {u +
e, u − e} where e > 0, thus increasing the sum since
This can be done to lead us to a sum where the entries add up to 24n3 , and 6n2
P 2
entries are equal to 4n with the rest equal to 0. Thus mij ≤ (6n2 )(4n)2 =
4(24n ) and the number of colourful sets does not exceed 24n4 . It remains to find
4
A1 A2 A3 A4
A2 A1 A4 A3
A3 A4 A1 A2
A4 A3 A2 A1
There are 42 n2 ways of picking the rows containing the cells of a colourful set.
For each choice, there are 4n2 ways of picking the columns. Hence there are 24n4
colourful sets in all.
b1 b2 + b1 b3 + b1 b4 + b2 b3 + b2 b4 + b3 b4
Ç å 4 Ç å Ç å 4 4
4n X bi 4n 1X 1X 2
= − = + bi − b
2 i=1
2 2 2 i=1 2 i=1 i
≤ 2n(4n − 1) + 21 (4n) − 18 (b1 + b2 + b3 + b4 )2 = 8n2 − 81 (16n2 ) = 6n2 .
Alternatively, we have
b1 b2 + b1 b3 + b1 b4 + b2 b3 + b2 b4 + b3 b4
= 21 [b1 (b2 + b3 + b4 ) + b2 (b3 + b4 + b1 ) + b3 (b4 + b1 + b2 ) + b4 (b1 + b2 + b3 )]
4 4 4
1X X 1X 2
= bi (4n − bi ) = 2n bi − bi ≤ 8n2 − 2n2 = 6n2 .
2 i=1 i=1
2 i=1
For the maximal configuration, the proposer considered the 4n×4n array consisting
of n2 4 × 4 tables identically coloured as follows:
1 2 3 4
2 1 4 3
3 4 1 2
4 3 2 1
where successive quartets of rows or columns are the same. There are
Ç å Ç å
4n n
−4 = 6n2
2 2
choices of pairs of distinct rows from which colourful sets can be selected. Now
consider a distinct pair of rows each consisting of n quartets of colours. There are
4 ways of selecting a colourful set if all its elements are in the same corresponding
quartet in the two rows. There are 8 ways of selecting a colourful set if its left two
elements lie in one quartet and the right two in another quartet in the two rows.
Hence the total number of colourful sets involving these two rows is
Ç å
n
4n + 8 = 4n2 .
2
x2 + y 2 + z 2 + 4xyz ≥ 1.
c a b
Since 1 − x = b+c , 1−y = c+a , 1−z = a+b , we have
Å ã
abc
xyz = (1 − x)(1 − y)(1 − z) = .
(a + b)(b + c)(c + a)
Hence,
4xyz = 2 − 2(x + y + z) + 2(xy + yz + zx),
and by adding x2 + y 2 + z 2 on both sides we obtain
2
x2 + y 2 + z 2 + 4xyz = 1 + ((x + y + z) − 1) ≥ 1.