ALK Risk Management Assignment - Muhammad Rakan - 1402224203
ALK Risk Management Assignment - Muhammad Rakan - 1402224203
ALK Risk Management Assignment - Muhammad Rakan - 1402224203
NIM : 1402224203
Class : AK-46-INT
Introduction
PT Bukit Asam Tbk (PTBA), a leading coal mining company in Indonesia, was
founded in 1938 and plays a vital role in providing national energy and contributing to
the country's economic development. Currently, PTBA has several coal mining sites in
South Sumatra and Jambi, as well as several subsidiaries engaged in energy, logistics, and
trading.
Risk management, the process of identifying, analyzing, and evaluating risks faced
by a company, and developing strategies to address them, is crucial for PTBA. Risks can
stem from various sources, such as commodity price fluctuations, changes in government
regulations, natural disasters, and work accidents.
In 2023, there were several main risks faced by the Company listed on the
Company’s Risk Profile namely:
1. Current Ratio
The current ratio is the division between current assets and current
liabilities to determine the company's ability to meet its short-term obligations.
Current Assets
Current Ratio =
Current Liablities
Expressed in million rupiah.
Fiscal Year 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
Total Current Assets 11.679.884 8.364.356 18.211.500 24.432.148 15.148.356
Total Short-term Liabilities 4.691.251 3.872.457 7.500.647 10.701.780 9.968.101
Current Ratio 249% 216% 243% 228% 152%
Analysis:
Current Ratio
300%
250%
200%
150%
100%
50%
0%
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
30.000.000
25.000.000
20.000.000
15.000.000
10.000.000
5.000.000
-
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
In general, the current ratio considered ideal is above 100%. This indicates that
the company has sufficient current assets to meet its short-term obligations.
In the case of PT Bukit Asam Tbk, its current ratio during the period 2019 to 2022
has always been above 100%. This shows that the company has a good ability to meet its
short-term obligations with its current assets.
However, in 2023, PT Bukit Asam Tbk's current ratio will decrease to 152%.
Although still above 100%, this decline needs to be watched out. This decrease can be
caused by several factors, but in PT Bukit Asam Tbk can certainly have a significant
decrease in total current assets, especially in time deposits.
2. Quick Ratio
Quick ratio, also known as fast liquidity ratio, is one of the liquidity ratios
used to measure a company's ability to meet its short-term obligations with the
most liquid assets. The most liquid assets are those that can be easily converted
into cash in a short period of time. The quick ratio is calculated by dividing the
most liquid current assets (cash, Short-term Investment, and net accounts
receivable) by short-term liabilities or current liabilities.
In general, the quick ratio that is considered ideal is above 100%. This
indicates that the company has the most liquid assets sufficient to meet its short-
term obligations.
𝑪𝒂𝒔𝒉 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝑪𝒂𝒔𝒉 𝑬𝒒𝒖𝒊𝒗𝒂𝒍𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒔 + 𝑺𝒉𝒐𝒓𝒕 𝑻𝒆𝒓𝒎 𝑰𝒏𝒗𝒆𝒔𝒕𝒎𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒔 + 𝑨𝒄𝒄𝒐𝒖𝒏𝒕 𝑹𝒆𝒄𝒆𝒊𝒗𝒂𝒃𝒍𝒆
𝑸𝒖𝒊𝒄𝒌 𝑹𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒐 =
𝑪𝒖𝒓𝒓𝒆𝒏𝒕 𝑳𝒊𝒂𝒃𝒊𝒍𝒊𝒕𝒊𝒆𝒔
Analysis:
Quick Ratio
200%
150%
100%
50%
0%
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
In the case of PT Bukit Asam Tbk, its quick ratio during the period 2019 to
2020 has always been above 100%. This shows that the company has a good ability
to meet its short-term obligations with the most liquid assets.
However, in 2021, PT Bukit Asam Tbk's quick ratio dropped to 100%. This
suggests that the company has sufficient ability to meet its short-term obligations
with the most liquid assets but does not have a large room for maneuver.
This decline in the quick ratio continues in 2022 and 2023, with the value of
the quick ratio in 2023 only 80%. This indicates that the company has a limited
ability to meet its short-term obligations with the most liquid assets.
3. Short-term liquidity risk conclusion
In general, PT Bukit Asam Tbk's ability to meet its short-term obligations
with current assets and the most liquid assets decreased during the period 2021
to 2023. This decrease needs to be watched out for and further analysis needs to
be carried out to find out the cause and take the necessary steps to correct it.
Analysis:
Conclusion
PT Bukit Asam Tbk (PTBA), a leading coal mining company in Indonesia has a vital
role in providing national energy and contributing to the country's economic
development. As a company operating in the inherently high-risk mining industry, PTBA
faces various potential losses and opportunities that can significantly impact its
operations and finances, such as, among others, Health, Safety, &; Environment risk,
project risk, sales & marketing risk, security threats risk, capacity risk, changes regulation
risk, market risk, and credit risk. The risk has been disclosed in their annual report along
with the risk mitigation measures.
The analysis of PT Bukit Asam Tbk's financial statements aims to assess the
company's financial health and identify potential risks and opportunities that may be
faced. Based on the analysis of liquidity and solvency ratios, PT Bukit Asam Tbk (PTBA)
shows potential financial risks that need to be watched out for. The decline in the current
ratio and quick ratio during the period 2021 to 2023 indicates a decrease in the company's
ability to meet its short-term obligations. This is exacerbated by a consistent increase in
the Debt to Asset Ratio (DAR) during the period 2019 to 2023, indicating high solvency
risk.
PTBA needs to take strategic steps to increase liquidity and lower its solvency risk,
such as accelerating the collection of accounts receivable, improving debt collection
efficiency, seeking long-term funding, increasing equity through the issuance of new
shares, or retained earnings, and conducting further analysis to determine the causes of
declining profitability and determine appropriate corrective measures.
It is important to remember that this analysis is based solely on the information
presented in PT Bukit Asam Tbk's financial statements. For a more complete analysis, it
is necessary to conduct further analysis of PT Bukit Asam Tbk's overall financial
statements and consider other qualitative factors such as economic conditions, industry,
and competition.
References