0% found this document useful (0 votes)
60 views24 pages

Webinar 5

The document discusses challenges with modeling inverter-based resources for grid interconnection. It describes the iterative facility model creation process and highlights issues that can arise obtaining preliminary design information, developing steady-state, short-circuit, dynamic and transient models, and ensuring models are properly tested and benchmarked.

Uploaded by

asem
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
60 views24 pages

Webinar 5

The document discusses challenges with modeling inverter-based resources for grid interconnection. It describes the iterative facility model creation process and highlights issues that can arise obtaining preliminary design information, developing steady-state, short-circuit, dynamic and transient models, and ensuring models are properly tested and benchmarked.

Uploaded by

asem
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 24

NERC Inverter-Based Resource (IBR) Webinar

Series:
Session 5: Modeling Part 1 – Modeling Requirements, Model Creation, Model Usability

June 20, 2023

RELIABILITY | RESILIENCE | SECURITY


Modeling Part 1 -
Modeling
Requirements,
Model Creation,
Model Usability
1. SOFTWARE
2. GRID EXPERIENCE
3. MODEL VALIDATION
4. ADAPTABILITY
5. CHALLENGES

Presentación comercial
1. SOFTWARE P0-E Offers Modeling support for the following programs

Software

• DIgSILENT Power Factory

• PSCAD

• PSS/E (WECC and User Defined)

• PSLF

• EMTP-RV

• TSAT-SSAT

• EMTP-ATP

• ANATEM

Presentación comercial
2. GRID CODE EXPERIENCE

• USA
• Australia
• España
• Portugal
• Alemania
• Francia
• UK
• Japón
• Omán
• Jordania
• México
• Brasil
• Uruguay
• Bolivia
• Argentina
• Chile P-E tries to proactively maintain model compliance but
• Egipto
It is challenging to track proposed updates in the US and
• Tailandia
• Vietnam worldwide

Presentación comercial
4. MODEL VALIDATION

SW UWM GENERIC Application


DIgSILENT Static studies
Power Factory Dynamic studies (RMS)
WECC: Dynamic studies (RMS)
PSS/E
Dynamic studies (RMS)
PSCAD Dynamic studies (EMT)
EMTP-RV Dynamic studies (EMT)
PSLF WECC: Dynamic studies (RMS)

Presentación comercial
• P-E provides general purpose models that must be
parametrized for site specific conditions.
• The Power-Electronics Grid Team is based in Valencia, Spain
and can assist with modeling issues and project specific
requirements
• Power-Electronics uses it’s world-wide experience in places like
Chile and Australia to advance the US modeling work
• P-E inverter models are benchmarked again our Hardware-in-
the-Loop

HIL PSCAD

Presentación comercial
¡THANKS!
9 RELIABILITY | RESILIENCE | SECURITY
Facility Model Creation
and Usability
Roadblocks
Billy F. Yancey III
VP Technical Services and Compliance

June 20, 2023


NERC IBR Webinar Series
Facility Model Creation Process
The facility model creation process is an iterative process with interaction between multiple parties, i.e., Developers,
OEMs, EORs, Consultants, etc.

Preliminary Design Bridging the gaps towards seamless preliminary design to interconnection
Interconnection Request
request.

Request for Information S G Model Creation Distribution


Distribution
Model Testing and
and Review Benchmarking

 Balance of Plant Design  Steady State Model (PSSE/PSLF)  ERCOT Model Quality Test
 Voltage control strategy of plant  Short Circuit Model (Aspen)  PJM Model Testing
 Generator models (PSSE, PSLF,  Dynamic Model (PSSE/PSLF/TSAT)  ISO-NE Model Testing (PP 5-6)
TSAT, PSCAD, Aspen, etc.)  Transient Model (PSCAD)  HECO Model Testing standards
 IEEE P2800 requirements
Facility Model Creation Process
The request for information and review can be a time-consuming process. This is where critical assumptions are
sometimes made that can have significant impacts on projects and could lead to need to restudy during the
interconnection process or even further down the road during commissioning.

RFI Challenges
Request for Information
and Review  BOP Design  Generator Models
 Typically, very preliminary and  Depending on requirements
 Balance of Plant Design subject to change leading to within a region, dynamic and
 Voltage control strategy of plant assumptions transient models may take
 Generator Models (PSSE, PSLF, TSAT,  Inverter selection is still extended time to provide due
PSCAD, Aspen, etc.) being negotiated and to availability of necessary
finalized controls
 Power Plant Controller (PPC)
is most of the time not even
in the discussion at this point
Facility Model Creation Process
Model creation is typically an iterative process. The assumptions made during the request for information gathering
are pre-tested to ensure they meet the necessary requirements and additional equipment/ controls are not needed
before moving to full model testing and benchmarking.

Model Creation Challenges

S G Model Creation  Steady State Model (PSSE/ PSLF)  Short Circuit Model (Aspen)
 MPT sizing and OLTC control  Utilities requested IBRs to be
 Need for additional reactive modeled as current limited
 Steady State Model (PSSE/PSLF) devices generators
 Short Circuit Model (Aspen)  Quantity of IBRs and OEM  Moved to Voltage control
 Dynamic Model (PSSE/PSLF) selection current source (VCCS)
 Transient Model (PSCAD)  Recently requested of
converter interface resources
(CIR)
Facility Model Creation Process
Model creation is typically an iterative process. The assumptions made during the request for information gathering
are pre-tested to ensure they meet the necessary requirements and additional equipment/ controls are not needed
before moving to full model testing and benchmarking.

Model Creation Challenges

 Dynamic Model (PSSE/ PSLF/ TSAT)  Transient Model (PSCAD)


S G Model Creation  Control parameters set as default without any guidance on  Similar concerns to dynamic model
tuning to meet requirements  Some OEM documentation not clear on P
 Minimal to no documentation related to tests to and Q initialization
 Steady State Model (PSSE/PSLF) demonstrated compliance with latest requirements  Some parameters are hidden as
 Short Circuit Model (Aspen)  Still concerns surrounding VRT response requirement compared to dynamic model and
 Dynamic Model (PSSE/PSLF/TSAT) (ERCOT) adjustments for benchmarking can be
 Transient Model (PSCAD)  Protection settings set to default without ranges provided challenging
 Hybrid PPCs
 OEMs provide PPC with model even though it is not
available or typically installed.
 No clarity on integrating external PPC
 UDM vs GM
Thank You
16 RELIABILITY | RESILIENCE | SECURITY
Establishing Modeling Requirements

ATC’s Experience in MISO

P R E S E N T E D B Y:

Tom Dagenais
Director, System Planning - ATC

June 20, 2023


- ATC Proprietary - atcllc.com
Introducing ATC

• Wisconsin-based company

• Over 5 million electric


consumers in service area

• Over 500 employees


making sure you have the
energy you need, when
you need it

18 - ATC Proprietary - atcllc.com


ATC Service Territory Resource Interconnection Projects:
Queues 2019-2022

19 - ATC Proprietary - atcllc.com


PSS/E vs. PSCAD Analysis
PSS/E Simulation PSCAD Simulation

Plot looks stable in PSS/E but is


seen to be oscillating in PSCAD.

• PSCAD provides a much


more detailed look at what is
happening on the system
After adding a transmission system fix,
PSCAD also shows a stable result.
20 - ATC Proprietary - atcllc.com
Streamlining the Process: SCR​
We can’t study everything… so we prioritize based on SCR and WSCR

• Short Circuit Ratio (SCR)​

• Weighted Short Circuit Ratio (WSCR)​

21 - ATC Proprietary - atcllc.com 21


Maintaining Reliability
• Reliability issues are real and are here today – and will become more
challenging in the future
• ATC among the first to include IBR requirements in our local planning criteria

• ATC has developed a PSCAD model


verification process to screen out modeling
issues before studies begin
 Includes a checklist, process guide, and
PSCAD test component
 Publicly available through ATCLLC.COM
• When more widely adopted, this will be seen
as a typical part of doing business
22 - ATC Proprietary - atcllc.com 22
23 - ATC Proprietary - atcllc.com
Feel free to reach out to us if
interested in participating in the NERC
IRPS or EMTTF!

24 RELIABILITY | RESILIENCE | SECURITY

You might also like