Tổng Hợp Đề Thi IELTS Reading Passage 1 Có Đáp Án Chi Tiết Mới Nhất
Tổng Hợp Đề Thi IELTS Reading Passage 1 Có Đáp Án Chi Tiết Mới Nhất
Tổng Hợp Đề Thi IELTS Reading Passage 1 Có Đáp Án Chi Tiết Mới Nhất
Reading Passage 1
Pheidole dentata, a native ant of the south-eastern U.S., isn't immortal. But scientists have
found that it doesn't seem to show any signs of aging. Old worker ants can do everything
just as well as the youngsters, and their brains appear just as sharp. 'We get a picture that
these ants really don't decline,' says Ysabel Giraldo, who studied the ants for her doctoral
thesis at Boston University.
Such age-defying feats are rare in the animal kingdom. Naked mole rats can live for almost
30 years and stay fit for nearly their entire lives. They can still reproduce even when old,
and they never get cancer. But the vast majority of animals deteriorate with age just like
people do. Like the naked mole rat, ants are social creatures that usually live in highly
organised colonies. 'It's this social complexity that makes P. dentata useful for studying
aging in people,' says Giraldo, now at the California Institute of Technology. Humans are
also highly social, a trait that has been connected to healthier aging. By contrast, most
animal studies of aging use mice, worms or fruit flies, which all lead much more isolated
lives.
In the lab, P. dentata worker ants typically live for around 140 days. Giraldo focused on ants
at four age ranges: 20 to 22 days, 45 to 47 days, 95 to 97 days and 120 to 122 days. Unlike
all previous studies, which only estimated how old the ants were, her work tracked the ants
from the time the pupae became adults, so she knew their exact ages. Then she put them
through a range of tests.
Giraldo watched how well the ants took care of the young of the colony, recording how
often each ant attended to, carried and fed them. She compared how well 20-day-old and
95-day-old ants followed the telltale scent that the insects usually leave to mark a trail to
food. She tested how ants responded to light and also measured how active they were by
counting how often ants in a small dish walked across a line. And she experimented with
how ants react to live prey: a tethered fruit fly. Giraldo expected the older ants to perform
poorly in all these tasks. But the elderly insects were all good caretakers and trail-
followers-the 95-day-old ants could track the scent even longer than their younger
counterparts. They all responded to light well, and the older ants were more active. And
when it came to reacting to prey, the older ants attacked the poor fruit fly just as
aggressively as the young ones did, flaring their mandibles or pulling at the fly's legs.
Then Giraldo compared the brains of 20-day-old and 95-day-old ants, identifying any cells
that were close to death. She saw no major differences with age, nor was there any
difference in the location of the dying cells, showing that age didn't seem to affect specific
brain functions. Ants and other insects have structures in their brains called mushroom
bodies, which are important for 82 processing information, learning and memory. She also
wanted to see if aging affects the density of synaptic complexes within these structures-
regions where neurons come together. Again, the answer was no. What was more, the old
ants didn't experience any drop in the levels of either serotonin or dopamine-brain
chemicals whose decline often coincides with aging. In humans, for example, a decrease
in serotonin has been linked to Alzheimer's disease.
'This is the first time anyone has looked at both behavioral and neural changes in these
ants so thoroughly,' says Giraldo, who recently published the findings in the Proceedings
of the Royal Society B. Scientists have looked at some similar aspects in bees, but the
results of recent bee studies were mixed-some studies showed age-related declines,
which biologists call senescence, and others didn't. 'For now, the study raises more
questions than it answers,' Giraldo says, 'including how P. dentata stays in such good
shape.'
Also, if the ants don't deteriorate with age, why do they die at all? Out in the wild, the ants
probably don't live for a full 140 days thanks to predators, disease and just being in an
environment that's much harsher than the comforts of the lab. 'The lucky ants that do live
into old age may suffer a steep decline just before dying,' Giraldo says, but she can't say
for sure because her study wasn't designed to follow an ant's final moments.
'It will be important to extend these findings to other species of social insects,' says Gene
E. Robinson, an entomologist at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. This ant
might be unique, or it might represent a broader pattern among other social bugs with
possible clues to the science of aging in larger animals. Either way, it seems that for these
ants, age really doesn't matter.
Questions 1-8
Questions 9-13
Do the following statements agree with the information give in Reading Passage 1?
In boxes 9-13 on your answer sheet, write
9 Pheidole dentata ants are the only known animals which remain active for almost their
whole lives.
10 Ysabel Giraldo was the first person to study Pheidole dentata ants using precise data
about the insects’ ages.
11 The ants in Giraldo’s experiments behaved as she had predicted that they would.
12 The recent studies of bees used different methods of measuring age-related decline.
13 Pheidole dentata ants kept in laboratory conditions tend to live longer lives.
Đáp án.
Câu 1: four / 4
Từ located info ở đoạn 3 cho biết: Giraldo focused on ants at four age ranges
Từ phần paraphrase: age range (phạm vi độ tuổi) = age group (nhóm tuổi)
=> ants at four age ranges = four age groups of ants
=> Có tổng cộng 4 age groups của ants trong nghiên cứu của Giraldo.
Câu 2: young
Từ located infor ta thấy: Giraldo watched how well the ants took care of the young of the
colony
=> Thứ được loại kiến looked after là “the young of the colony”
Nếu không hiểu cụm này nghĩa là gì, vẫn có thể suy ra đáp án nhờ cấu trúc sau:
=> “the young” mới là đối tượng chính được “looked after”, còn “of the colony” chỉ cho thêm
thông tin (“the young” thuộc về “the colony”)
-> So với câu hỏi: how well ants looked after their …………….. = how well the ants took care of
the young.
Câu 3: food
Câu trên cho thông tin rằng: ants followed the telltale scent … to mark a trail to food.
=> Loài ants đi theo telltale scent để đánh dấu trail dẫn đến food
-> So với câu hỏi: their ability to locate .............. using a scent trail = followed the telltale
scent… to mark a trail to food.
=> the effect that light had on ants = how ants responded to light
Câu 5: aggressively
Câu này nói đến việc ants “reacting to prey” và “attacked the poor fruit fly”. Trước đó, ở câu
4 đoạn 4 đã đề cập fruit fly là prey của ants
=> Câu này đang miêu tả “how ants attacked prey” ta cần tìm.
Câu này cho info: the older ants attacked the poor fruit fly just as aggressively as the
young ones
=> Cả older ants và young ants đều attacked their prey aggressively
Câu 6: location
Located info trên “compared the brains” giữa 2 nhóm ants; và đưa ra kết luận là “ no major
differences with age , nor was there any difference in the location of the dying cells”
=> Thứ được compare là age (đã được mention trong đề) và “the location of the dying
cells”
-> So với câu hỏi: comparison between age and the ............of dying cells in the brains of
ants
Câu 7: neurons
Read in structure để phân tích cấu trúc câu như sau:
=> Có detail rằng synaptic complexes chính là regions where neurons come together
=> neurons sẽ tụ lại với nhau (come together = meet) ở tại synaptic complexes
Câu 8: chemicals
Câu trên có list ra tên 2 loại “brain chemicals” (serotonin & dopamine). Đồng thời cũng
cho biết decline (suy giảm) trong level của 2 loại brain chemicals này coincides with
aging.
=> Thứ liên quan đến ageing ta cần tìm chính là 2 loại brain chemicals trên.
-> So với câu hỏi: level of two ...............in the brain associated with ageing = levels of
either serotonin or dopamine-brain chemicals whose decline often coincides with aging.
Câu 9: False
Scan trong bài ko thấy được cụm “the only known animals” và “remain active” => Vội
chọn NOT GIVEN
Câu 1 đoạn 2: “Such age-defying feats are rare in the animal kingdom”
=> Thấy từ “rare” là hiếm, nên chắc có lẽ là Pheidole dentata ants là “the only known
animals” => Vội chọn TRUE
2. Với Linearthinking
Bài đọc đưa ra dẫn chứng về naked mole rats và cho biết chúng có thể:
● can still reproduce even when old => reproduce (sinh sản) cũng là 1 dạng của việc
remain active
=> Có thể reproduce cả khi già = có khả năng reproduce từ trẻ đến già (trong hầu hết suốt
đời)
Câu 10 True
Với Linearthinking
=> “Unlike all previous studies” = Nghiên cứu của Ysabel Giraldo khác biệt so với những
nghiên cứu trước đây.
Đồng thời câu này đưa ra điểm khác biệt là => previous studies chỉ ước chừng age của
ants
● Ysabel Giraldo: she knew their exact ages => Ysabel Giraldo biết age chính xác của
ants
=> Vậy tóm lại Ysabel Giraldo khác biệt với tất cả previous studies ở chỗ cô ấy biết age
chính xác của ants
=> Ysabel Giraldo chính là người đầu tiên sử dụng data chính xác khi nghiên cứu về ants
Giraldo expect (=predict) rằng: older ants sẽ ko thể thực hiện task tốt
Nhưng thực tế là: But older ants là good caretakers and trail-followers + và có thể track the
scent even longer khi so với younger ants.
=> Từ nối “but” cho thấy sự khác biệt giữa thực tế và những gì Giraldo expect từ trước
=> Trong khi Giraldo nghĩ rằng older ants ko thể thực hiện task tốt, thì thực tế là older
ants còn thực hiện tốt hơn cả younger ants.
=> ants trong Giraldo's experiments ko hành động giống như những gì Giraldo đã predict
từ trước.
Scan được ở đoạn 6 có các keyword y như trong câu hỏi như “recent studies of bees” và
“age-related decline”. Đồng thời thấy từ “mixed” giống với “different” => Vội chọn TRUE
Scan thấy trong located info có từ “similar” ngược nghĩa với “different” trong câu hỏi => Vội
chọn FALSE
2. Với Linearthinking
Câu này chỉ đưa thông tin rằng: có sự khác nhau trong results của recent bee studies: 1
số cho thấy age-related declines, còn 1 số thì ko
=> Ko có thông tin method dùng trong các studies này có different hay ko