TRAINING SESSION EVALUATION FORM

INSTRUCTIONS:
This post-training evaluation instrument is intended to measure how
satisfactorily your trainer has done his job during the whole duration of your
training. Please give your honest rating by checking on the corresponding cell of
your response. Your answers will be treated with utmost confidentiality.
Legend: 5 - Outstanding
4 - Very Good/ Very Satisfactory
3 - Good/ Adequate
2 - Fair/ Satisfactory
1 – Poor/Unsatisfactory
*Examples from Hypothetical Data
Trainee# 1
TRAINERS/INSTRUCTORS
5 4 3 2 1
Name of Trainer: (Alexander Macabuhay )
1. Orients trainees about CBT, the use of CBLM and the
✔
evaluation system
2. Discusses clearly the unit of competencies and
✔
outcomes to be attained at the start of every module
3. Exhibits mastery of the subject/course he/she is
✔
teaching
4. Motivates and elicits active participation from
✔
students or trainees
5. Keeps records of evidence/s of competency
✔
attainment of each student/ trainees
6. Instill value of safety and orderliness in the
✔
classrooms and workshops
7. Instills the value of teamwork and positive work
✔
values
8. Instills good grooming and hygiene.
9. Instills value of time ✔
10. Quality of voice while teaching ✔
11. Clarity of language/dialect used in teaching ✔
12. Provides extra attention to trainees and students
✔
with specific learning needs
13. Attendswork-based training regularly and promptly ✔
14. Shows energy and enthusiasm while teaching ✔
15. Maximize use of training supplies and materials ✔
16. Dresses appropriately ✔
17. Shows empathy ✔
18. Demonstrates self-control √
 This post training evaluation instrument is intended to measure how
satisfactorily your trainer prepared and facilitated your training. Please give
your honest rating by checking on the corresponding cell of your response. Your
answer will be treated with utmost confidentiality.
Use the following rating scales:
5- Outstanding
4- Very Good/Very Satisfactory
3- Good/Adequate
2- Fair/Satisfactory
1- Poor/Unsatisfactory

Trainee # 1
PREPARATION 1 2 3 4 5
1. Workshop layout conforms with the 
components of a CBT workshop
2. Number of CBLM is sufficient 

3. Objectives of every training session is well 

explained
4. Expected activities/outputs are clarified 

DESIGN AND DELIVERY 1 2 3 4 5

1. Course contents are sufficient to attain 
objectives
2. CBLM are logically organized and presented 

3. Information Sheet are comprehensive in 

providing the required knowledge
4. Examples, illustrations and demonstrations 
help you learn
5. Practice exercises like Task/Job Sheets are 
sufficient to learn required skills
6. Valuable knowledge are learned through the 
contents of the course
7. Training Methodologies are effective 

8. Assessment Methods and evaluation system are 

suitable for the trainees and the competency
9. Recording of achievements and competencies 
acquired is prompt and comprehensive
 10. Feedback about the performance of 
learners are given immediately
TRAINING FACILITIES/RESOURCES 1 2 3 4 5
1. Training Resources are adequate 

2. Training Venue is conducive and appropriate 

3. Equipment, Supplies and Materials are 

sufficient
4. Equipment, Supplies and Materials are suitable 
and appropriate
5. Promptness in providing supplies and materials 

SUPPORT STAFF
1. Support staff are accommodating 

Comments/Suggestions:
Our trainer has executed the training delivery very well. We were given an
adequate number of CBLM to cater the number of students.. The
activities were too much for us to handle because we were not oriented
what was expected of us. The design and delivery of her lesson was
somehow good.
 1. Self-Evaluation

During the session, did I? Yes No

1. Establish an atmosphere of trust? 
2. Encourage participation of the trainees? 
3. Assist the trainees when they needed
assistance?

4. Consider the feedback of trainees? 
5. Remain aware of non-verbal communication? 
6. Praise effort? 
7. Summarize key points? 
8. Vary activities and tasks to aid attainment of
competency?

9. Provide opportunities for practice? 
10. Achieve the learning objectives 
 SUPERVISED INDUSTRY TRAINING OR ON THE JOB
TRAINING EVALUATION FORM

Dear Trainees:
The following questionnaire is designed to evaluate the effectiveness of the
Supervised Industry Training (SIT) or On the Job Training (OJT) you had with
the Industry Partners of (Masbate Intitute of Fisheries and Techology).
Please check (/) the appropriate box corresponding to your rating for each
question asked. The results of this evaluation shall serve as basis for improving
the design and management of the SIT in (Masbate Intitute of Fisheries
and Techology) to maximize the benefits of the said Program. Thank you for
your cooperation.
Legend:
5 - Outstanding
4 - Very Good/ Very Satisfactory
3 - Good/ Adequate
2 - Fair/ Satisfactory
1 – Poor/Unsatisfactory
Trainee # 1
Item Questions Ratings
No.
INSTITUTIONAL EVALUATION 1 2 3 4 5 NA
Has (Masbate Intitute of
Fisheries and Techology)
1
conducted an orientation about
the SIT/OJT program, the

requirements and preparations
needed and expectations?
Has (Masbate Intitute of
Fisheries and Techology)
2
provided necessary assistance
such as referrals or

recommendations in finding the
company for your OJT?
Has (Masbate Intitute of
Fisheries and Techology)
3
showed coordination with the
Industry partner in the design

and supervision of your
SIT/OJT?
Has your in-school training
4 adequate to undertake 
Industry?
 Has (Masbate Intitute of
Fisheries and Techology)
5
monitored your progress in the

Industry?
Has the supervision been
6 effective in achieving your OJT 
objectives and providing
feedbacks when necessary?
Did (Masbate Intitute of
Fisheries and Techology)
7
conduct assessment of your 
SIT/OJT program upon
completion?
Where you provided with the
results of the Industry and
8
(Masbate Intitute of Fisheries 
and Techology) assessment of
your OJT?
Comments/Suggestions:
For our stay in this institution, we were well guided and informed about
our roles and responsibilities. Our achievements were monitored by our
trainer, I believe the institution did well in supervising our progress.
 Average Ratings
Item Questions Average
No.
INSTITUTIONAL EVALUATION
Has (Masbate Intitute of Fisheries and Techology) 4
conducted an orientation about the SIT/OJT program,
1
the requirements and preparations needed and
expectations?
Has (Masbate Intitute of Fisheries and 5
Techology)provided necessary assistance such as
2
referrals or recommendations in finding the company for
your OJT?
Has (Masbate Intitute of Fisheries and Techology) 4
showed coordination with the Industry partner in the
3
design and supervision of your SIT/OJT?
Has your in-school training adequate to undertake 5
Industry?
4
Has (Masbate Intitute of Fisheries and Techology) 5
monitored your progress in the Industry?
5
Has the supervision been effective in achieving your OJT 4
objectives and providing feedbacks when necessary?
6
Did (Masbate Intitute of Fisheries and Techology) 5
conduct assessment of your SIT/OJT program upon
7
completion?
Where you provided with the results of the Industry and 5
(Masbate Intitute of Fisheries and Techology)
8
assessment of your OJT?
General Average 4.625
Outstanding
Range: 0.00- 1.49 =Poor/Unsatisfactory
1.50- 2.49 =Fair/Adequate
2.50- 3.49 =Good/Satisfactory
3.50- 4.49 =Very Good/Very Satisfactory
4.50- 5.00 =Outstanding
General Interpretation:
The average rating for institutional evaluation is Very Good and
Satisfactory. The institution has provided its trainees good
accommodation during the period of OJT. We were somehow
supervised and monitored very well and well-guided.
 Recommendation:
The trainer needs to smile and gives us encouragement, tips and hints if there are
difficulties that we encounter

Trainee # 1
Ite
m Question Ratings
No.
INDUSTRY PARTNER 1 2 3 4 5 NA
Was the JJ.Lim Construction Co.
1 appropriate for your type of training 
required and/or desired?
Has the JJ.Lim Construction
2 Co.designed the training to meet 
your objectives and expectations?
Has the JJ.Lim Construction
Co.showed coordination with
3 (Masbate Intitute of Fisheries and 
Techology) in the design and
supervision of the SIT/OJT?
Has the JJ.Lim Construction Co.
and its staff welcomed you and
4
treated you with respect and

understanding?
Has the JJ.Lim Construction Co.
facilitated the training, including
the provision of the necessary
5
resources such as facilities and

equipment needed to achieve your
OJT objectives?
Has the JJ.Lim Construction Co.
6 assigned a supervisor to oversee 
your work or training?
Was the supervisor effective in
7 supervising you through regular 
meetings, consultations and advise?
Has the training provided you with
the necessary technical and
8
administrative exposure of real

world problems and practices?
9 Has the training program allowed 
you to develop self-confidence, self-
motivation and positive attitude
 towards work?
Has the experience improved your
10 personal skills and human 
relations?
11 Are you satisfied with your training
in the Industry?


Comments/Suggestions:
The industry partner was very accommodating and promoting. Yet, there
was no good supervision of our progress. They should have a regular
meeting, consultation and advice to us. These will help us in improving
ourselves and for us to know our mistakes in doing the task. The industry
and the school’s supervision was not well monitored. We were not given
what we should do as to how we can more harness our skills.

Signature: ______________________________
Printed Name: Eugene Alfred Auginaldo Qualification:
(Electrical Installation and Maintenance NC2)

Host Industry Partner: Supervisor:

JJ.Lim Construction Co. Engr._Ryan Llanto___

Period of Training: __March 25 – May 3 2024___ Instructor:

(Alexander A. Macabuhay)
 Average Ratings
Item
Question Average
No.
INDUSTRY PARTNER
Was the JJ.Lim Construction Co. appropriate for your type
1
of training required and/or desired? 5
Has the JJ.Lim Construction Co.designed the training to
2
meet your objectives and expectations? 4
Has JJ.Lim Construction Co.showed coordination with
3 (Masbate Intitute of Fisheries and Techology) in the
design and supervision of the SIT/OJT? 4
Has the JJ.Lim Construction Co.and its staff welcomed you
4
and treated you with respect and understanding? 5
Has the JJ.Lim Construction Co. facilitated the training,
5 including the provision of the necessary resources such as
facilities and equipment needed to achieve your OJT objectives? 4
Has the JJ.Lim Construction Co. assigned a supervisor to
6
oversee your work or training? 5
Was the supervisor effective in supervising you through regular
7
meetings, consultations and advise? 4
Has the training provided you with the necessary technical and
8
administrative exposure of real world problems and practices? 4
Has the training program allowed you to develop self-
9
confidence, self-motivation and positive attitude towards work? 5
Has the experience improved your personal skills and human
10
relations? 5
11 Are you satisfied with your training in the Industry? 4
General Average 4.45
Outstanding
Range: 0.00- 1.49 =Poor/Unsatisfactory
1.50- 2.49 =Fair/Adequate
2.50- 3.49 =Good/Satisfactory
3.50- 4.49 =Very Good/Very Satisfactory
4.50- 5.00 =Outstanding

General Interpretation:
The reason why I gave the average score of 4.45 was that my
overall stay in the industry was good and it harnessed the skills out of
my professional growth. We were given such a wonderful experience and
it made our stay so memorable.
Recommendation:
So far our experience in our training is very efficient , I learned a lot, I just felt
the time allotted for the training is lacking since im a slow learner and I need
more practice