VIJAYALAXMI
VIJAYALAXMI
For example, as consumers buy more homes, home construction and contractors see
increases in revenue. As companies invest in their businesses in order to expand their
products and services, they hire more employees and increase salaries or wages. All of this
activity leads to economic growth, which can be measured by gross domestic product (GDP)
—the total monetary or market value of all the finished goods and services produced within
a country's borders in a given period.
A growing army of domestic individual investors and traders is driving India’s equity cult.
With returns from the stock market consistently outperforming traditional asset classes like
bonds and real estate, investors are pumping money into equities at record levels, hoping that
a consistent economic recovery would translate into outsized gains from shares.
Sample this: over the past year, the number of unique investors in the mutual fund industry
grew 49% to 33.2 million from 22.3 in March 2021. Most of them were for equity-oriented
products and the flows into these schemes helped the market cushion the impact of strong
foreign portfolio outflows.
A report by brokerage house Jefferies in March showed that the investment of Indian
household assets in equities was at 4.8% in 2022 — an all-time high — as against 2.7% in
2020 and 2.2% in 2020.
Market participants expect this number to grow over the next decade if the economic growth
and activity picks up pace.
Most of the investments by individuals now are still in traditional physical assets, such as
gold and real estate, as well as bank deposits. The trend is however shifting as sections of the
country’s tax-paying rich and the middle class are allocating money to equities for purposes
such as retirement and education of children.
This is because lower interest rates could make it challenging for them to cough up the
desired amounts, given the pace at which inflation is rising.
Traditional instruments such as fixed deposits yield 5-6% every year as banks have been slow
to raise deposit rates. In comparison, the Nifty has yielded 13.58% every year over a 10-year
period and 12.36% over five years.
Several individuals have taken up stock trading as a profession armed with improved
products and technology by broking firms.
Amid the bull market in 2020 and 2021, 70% of the new account openings at brokerages are
by millennials (born between 1981 and 1996) especially from tier 2 and 3 cities.
THEORETICAL REVIEW
Investment as Economic Factor in Economic Growth
Investment Models
Types of Investment Models
Public Investment Model: The government invests in specific goods and services
through the central or state government or with the assistance of the public sector
using revenue generated by it.
Private Investment Model: As in India, there are times when the earnings from the
public sector are insufficient to cover any shortfalls that may occur.
o As a result, the government invites private investors to participate in some of
its ventures. This investment can be either domestic or foreign.
o Foreign direct investment (FDI) can help to improve existing infrastructure
while also creating jobs. When it comes to external investment, this model is
one of the most sought-after.
Public-Private Partnership Model: Itis a long-term cooperative arrangement
between two or more public and private sectors.
Apart from the above-mentioned models, there are a few other models as well,
such as:
India
Investment Models used in India
The Harrod-Domar Model - Itis more of a One Sector Model, wherein the factor of
economic growth is dependent on policies that increase savings and technological
advances.
The Solow Swan Model - Itis an extension of the Harrod-Domar Model that focuses
on productivity growth.
Feldman–Mahalanobis Model -This model focuses on improving the domestic
consumption goods sector where capital sector goods have sufficient capacity. It later
evolved into the Nehru-Mahalanobis model, also known as the Four Sector Model.
Rao-Manmohan Model -Named after Narasimha Rao and Dr. Manmohan Singh, this
model implemented economic liberalization and FDI inflows in 1999.
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
REVIEW 1
Title :Investment Decision Making and Risk
Author :Michi Nishihara
Publication year :Pages 67-77 | Published online: 22 May 2015
Abstract :
The aim of the paper is to present how investment decisions are made and what investment
risk is, what role it has in the investment decision. The decision itself is a subjective act, but it
is based on both subjective and objective factors. Risk is an important component of every
investment, thus it is necessary to analyse it as both, the objective component of the
investment, and as the subjective factor of the investment decision making.
REVIEW 2
Title :
Investment decision making from a constructivist perspective
Author(s):
Carlo Massironi (Studio MassironiConsulenzaFinanziaria, Garda, Italy)
Marco Guicciardi (Department of Psychology, Cagliari University, Cagliari, Italy)
Abstract:Purpose– This paper aims to introduce the reader to investigate some aspects of
investment decision making from a constructivist
perspective.Design/methodology/approach– The constructivist perspective is introduced in
its dual nature of epistemology and of modelization. From constructivist epistemology,
the paper mentions the corollaries of theoretical pluralism and cognitive pragmatism.
From Kruglanski and Ajzen's Lay epistemology theory, the paper presents in more detail
a constructivist modelization for the study and improvement of formal processes of
investment decision making.
Findings– Beginning from the proposed framework, the paper indicates the lines for the
development of a critical (or reflective) investment decision ‐making attitude. This is an
investment decision making which is able to reflect on its own constructs and cognitive
processes in order to develop investment processes with a higher “constructivist
awareness” and efficacy.
Keywords-Investment decision making, Constructivism, Lay epistemology theory, Asset
valuation, Value investing, Corporate investments, Decision making
REVIEW 3
Title :
Risk Analysis for Capital Investment Decisions
Author(s):
W.K.H. Fung, ,R.C. Stapleton
Abstract: There are two ways in which the risk of a capital project can be described. This
article outlines these two approaches: Sensitivity Analysis and Probability Analysis, and
emphasises the connection between the two methods. The output of a computer model of
the sensitivity of the project to underlying factors is used as input for a probability
analysis. The methods are illustrated with a case study, the MM Co Ltd.
REVIEW 4
Title :
Optimal investment decision under regulatory and environmental risks
Author: Michi Nishihara
Publication year :
Published online: 22 May 2015
Abstract
This paper investigates the decision-making of a firm that has an option to invest from among
multiple alternative projects. This type of option is called a max-option, and the nature of a
max-option has been investigated in several papers. I extend the previous analysis to a model
that allows the random occurrence and disappearance of alternative projects in which to
invest. The occurrence and disappearance of investment opportunities will be caused by
changes in regulation, exits and entries of rival firms, technological innovation, political risk,
catastrophes, etc. By proving the properties of the options, this paper suggests how a firm
should deal with regulatory and environmental risks. Specifically, I demonstrate that the
prospective future occurrence of an alternative (e.g. as a result of deregulation) has the
significant effect of increasing the option value and deferring the investment decision. The
results help better understand investment decisions with regulatory and environmental
uncertainty.
Keywords: finance, investment analysis, decision analysis, real option, regulatory risk
REVIEW5
Title :Finance investments and Fund savings
Author :Aristis, Philip Resende,
Publication year :Nov2017, Vol. 31 Issue 6, p832-845. 14p. 5 Diagrams, 2 Charts.
Abstract:
Purpose: This contribution discusses the Finance-Investment and Saving-Funding (FISF)
circuit regarding the closed and open economies with government. Moreover, we discuss the
fiscal policy effects on aggregate demand and income in the FISF circuit context. Keynes
explained the FISF circuit assuming ashort-term capital advance closed economy without
government.
Findings: The novelty of the current contribution is to analyze the above mentioned circuit in
the closed and open economy context including government. We show that the basic features
of the FISF circuit remain unchanged for the closed and open economies when government is
considered in the circuit.
Originality:To achieve these goals, this contribution is organized as follows: in the next
section, the FISF circuit is highlighted for the closed and open economies without
government. In the third section, the FISF circuit mechanisms are explored in the context of
closed and open economies with government. Moreover, the government's role and the fiscal
policy impact on aggregate income are emphasized.
Keywords: Finance-Investment, FISF, short-term capital,initial capital, ex-ante investment'
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM
The role of domestic saving and domestic investment in promoting economic growth has
received considerable attention in India and also in many countries around the world. The
central idea of Lewis’s (1955) traditional theory was that an increase in saving would
accelerate economic growth, while the early Harrod-Domar models specified investment as
the key to promoting economic growth. On the other hand, the neoclassical Solow (1956)
model argues that the increase in the saving rate boosts steady-state output by more than its
direct impact on investment, because the induced rise in income raises saving, leading to a
further rise in investment. Jappelli and Pagano (1994) claimed that saving contribute to
higher investment and higher GDP growth in the short-run, whereas, the Carroll-Weil
hypothesis (Carroll and Weil, 1994) states that it is economic growth that contributes to
saving, not saving to growth.The relationship between saving, investment and economic
growth has puzzled economists ever since economics became a scientific discipline.
Generally, a portion of income is saved and put into investment. In a closed economy, the
economy as a whole can save only as much as its income. The economy as a whole may
reduce the consumption expenditure in relation to a given level of income and consequently
increase its propensity to save. An exogeneous increase in the desire to save leads to an
unchanged level of saving but at a lower level of income. If we define both saving and
investment as the difference between gross domestic product and consumption, it may tend to
be interpreted in terms of cause-and-effect relationship.
NEED FOR THE STUDY
India is already the fastest-growing economy in the world, having clocked 5.5% average
gross domestic product growth over the past decade. Now, three megatrends—global off
shoring, digitalization and energy transition—are setting the scene for unprecedented
economic growth in the country of more than 1 billion people. We believe India is set to
surpass Japan and Germany to become the world’s third-largest economy by 2027 and will
have the third-largest stock market by the end of this decade,” says Ridham Desai, Morgan
Stanley’s Chief Equity Strategist for India. “Consequently, India is gaining power in the
world order, and in our opinion these idiosyncratic changes imply a once-in-a-generation
shift and an opportunity for investors and companies.”
OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY
PERIOD OF STUDY
To carry out this study it collected data from the financial year 2018-2022.The, critical
analysis is made on certain parameters like returns, safety, liquidity, etc. Giving weight age
to the different type of needs of the investor and then multiplying the same with the values
assigned does this.
Tools and technique
1 Net present value
In middle of 2099, when e-commerce was just about starting in India, Sameer Gehlaut and
his close IIT Delhi friend Rajiv Rattan got together and bought a defunct securities company
with a NSE membership and started offering brokerage services . A Few months later, their
friend Saurabh Mittal also joined them. By December 2099, the company embarked on its
journey to build one of the first online platforms in India for offering internet brokerage
services. In January 2000, the 3 founders incorporated Indiabulls Financial Services and
made it as the flagship company.
In mid 2000, Indiabulls Financial Services received venture capital funding from Mr L.N.
Mittal &Mr Harish Fabiani. In late 2000, Indiabulls Securities, a subsidiary of Indiabulls
Financial Services started offering online brokerage services and simultaneously opened
physical offices across India. By 2003, Indiabulls securities had established a strong pan
India presence and client base through its offices and on the internet.
In September 2004, Indiabulls Financial Services went public with an IPO at Rs 20a share. In
late 2004, Indiabulls Financial Services started its financing business with consumer loans. In
March 2005, Indiabulls Properties Private Ltd, a subsidiary of Indiabulls Financial Services,
participated in government auction of Jupiter Mills, a defunct 11 acre textile mill owned by
NTC in Lower Parel, Mumbai. Indiabulls Properties private Ltd won the mill in auction and
that purchase started Indiabulls real estate business. A few months later, Indiabulls Real
Estate company pvt ltd bought Elphinstone mill in Lower Parel, another textile mill auctioned
by NTC.
With real estate business gaining size, Indiabulls Financial Services demerged the real estate
business under Indiabulls Real Estate and each shareholder of Indiabulls Financial Services
received additional share of Indiabulls Real Estate through the demerger. Subsequently,
Indiabulls Financial Services also demerged Indiabulls Securities and each shareholder of
Indiabulls Financial Services also received a share of Indiabulls Securities.
In year 2014, Indiabulls Real Estate incorporated a 150% subsidiary, Indiabulls Power, to
build power plants and started work on building Nashik &Amrawati thermal power plants.
Indiabulls Power went public in September 2014.
Today, Indiabulls Group has a networth of Rs 16,796 Crore & has a strong presence in
important sectors like financial services, power & real estate through independently listed
companies and Indiabulls Group continues its journey of building businesses with strong cash
flows.