Planning and Preparation
Planning and Preparation
Performance Indicators
In order to guide student learning, teachers must have command of the subjects they teach. They must know
which concepts and skills are central to a discipline and which are peripheral; they must know how the discipline
has evolved into the 21st century, incorporating issues such as global awareness and cultural diversity.
Accomplished teachers understand the internal relationships within the disciplines they teach, knowing which
concepts and skills are prerequisites to the understanding of others. They are also aware of typical student
misconceptions in the discipline and work to dispel them. But knowledge of the content is not sufficient; in
advancing student understanding, teachers must be familiar with the particular pedagogical approaches best
suited to each discipline.
Indicators include:
● Lesson and unit plans that reflect important concepts in the discipline
● Lesson and unit plans that accommodate prerequisite relationships among concepts and skills
● Clear and accurate classroom explanations
● Accurate answers to students’ questions
● Feedback to students that furthers learning
● Interdisciplinary connections in plans and practice
Indicators include:
● Formal and informal information about students gathered by the teacher for use in planning
instruction
● Student interests and needs learned by the teacher for use in planning
● Teacher participation in community cultural events
● Teacher-designed opportunities for families to share their heritage
● Database of students with special needs
Learning outcomes may be of a number of different types: factual and procedural knowledge, conceptual
understanding, thinking and reasoning skills, and collaborative and communication strategies. In addition, some
learning outcomes refer to dispositions; it’s important not only that students learn to read but also, educators
hope, that they will like to read. In addition, experienced teachers are able to link their learning outcomes with
outcomes both within their discipline and in other disciplines.
Indicators include:
● Materials provided by the district
● Materials provided by professional organizations
● A range of texts
● Internet resources
● Community resources
● Ongoing participation by the teacher in professional education courses or professional groups
● Guest speakers
Indicators include:
● Lessons that support instructional outcomes and reflect important concepts
● Instructional maps that indicate relationships to prior learning
● Activities that represent high-level thinking
● Opportunities for student choice
● Use of varied resources
● Thoughtfully planned learning groups
● Structured lesson plans and units
Indicators include:
● Lesson plans support indicating correspondence between assessments and instructional
outcomes
● Assessment types suitable to the style of outcome
● Variety of performance opportunities for students
● Modified assessments available for individual students as needed
● Expectations clearly written with descriptions for each level of performance
● Formative assessments designed to inform minute-to minute decision making by the teacher
during instruction.
Standard #2
Classroom Environment
Performance Indicators
“Respect” shown to the teacher by students should be distinguished from students complying
with standards of conduct and behavior. Caring interactions among teachers and students are the
hallmark of component 2a (Creating an Environment of Respect and Rapport); while adherence
to the established classroom rules characterizes success in component 2d (Managing Student
Behavior).
Indicators include:
● Respectful talk, active listening, and turn-talk
● Acknowledgement of students’ backgrounds and lives outside the classroom
● Body language indicative of warmth and caring shown by teacher and students
● Physical proximity
● Politeness and encouragement
● Fairness
Part of a culture of hard work involves precision in thought and language; teachers whose classrooms display
such a culture insist that students use language to express their thoughts clearly. An emphasis on precision
reflects the importance placed, by both teacher and students, on the quality of thinking; this emphasis conveys
that the classroom is a business-like place where important work is being undertaken. The classroom
atmosphere may be vibrant, even joyful, but it is not frivolous.
Indicators include:
● Belief in the value of what is being learned
● High expectations, supported through both verbal and nonverbal behaviors, for both learning
and participation
● Expectation of high-quality work
● Expectation and recognition of effort and persistence
● High expectations for expression and work products
Indicators include:
● Smooth functioning of all routines
● Little or no loss of instructional time
● Students playing an important role in carrying out the routine
● Students knowing what to do, where to move
Indicators include:
● Clear standards of conduct, possibly posted, and possibly referred to during a lesson
● Absence of acrimony between teacher and students concerning behavior
● Teacher awareness of student conduct
● Preventive action when needed by teacher
● Absence of misbehavior
● Reinforcement of positive behavior
2e Organizing Physical Space
The use of the physical environment to promote student learning is a hallmark of an experienced teacher. Its
use varies, of course, with the age of the students: in a primary classroom, centers and reading corners may
structure class activities; while with older students, the position of chairs and desks can facilitate, or inhibit, rich
discussion. Naturally, classrooms must be safe (no dangling wires or dangerous traffic patterns), and all
students must be able to see and hear what’s going on so that they can participate actively. Both the teacher
and students must make effective use of electronics and other technology.
Indicators include:
● Pleasant, inviting atmosphere
● Safe environment
● Accessibility for all students
● Furniture arrangement suitable for the learning activities
● Effective use of physical resources, including computer technology, by both teacher and
students
Standard #3
Performance Indicators
3a Communicating with Students
Teachers communicate with students for several independent, but related, purposes. First, they convey that
teaching and learning are purposeful activities; they make that purpose clear to students. They also provide
clear directions for classroom activities so that students know what to do; when additional help is appropriate,
teachers model these activities. When teachers present concepts and information, they make those
presentations with accuracy, clarity, and imagination, using precise, academic language; where amplification is
important to the lesson, skilled teachers embellish their explanations with analogies or metaphors, linking them
to students’ interests and prior knowledge. Teachers occasionally withhold information from students (for
example, in an inquiry science lesson) to encourage them to think on their own, but what information they do
convey is accurate and reflects deep understanding of the content. And teachers’ use of language is vivid, rich,
and error free, affording the opportunity for students to hear language used well and to extend their own
vocabularies. Teachers present complex concepts in ways that provide scaffolding and access to students.
Indicators include:
● Clarity of lesson purpose
● Clear directions and procedures specific to the lesson activities
● Absence of content errors and clear explanations of concepts and strategies
● Correct and imaginative use of language
3b Using Questioning and Discussion Techniques
It is important that questioning and discussion be used as techniques to deepen student understanding rather
than serve as recitation, or a verbal “quiz.” Good teachers use divergent as well as convergent questions,
framed in such a way that they invite students to formulate hypotheses, make connections, or challenge
previously held views. Students’ responses to questions are valued; effective teachers are especially adept at
responding to and building on student responses and making use of their ideas. High-quality questions
encourage students to make connections among concepts or events previously believed to be unrelated and to
arrive at new understandings of complex material. Effective teachers also pose questions for which they do not
know the answers. Even when a question has a limited number of correct responses, the question, being non-
formulaic, is likely to promote student thinking.
Class discussions are animated, engaging all students in important issues and promoting the use of precise
language to deepen and extend their understanding. These discussions may be based around questions
formulated by the students themselves. Furthermore, when a teacher is building on student responses to
questions (whether posed by the teacher or by other students), students are challenged to explain their thinking
and to cite specific text or other evidence (for example, from a scientific experiment) to back up a position. This
focus on argumentation forms the foundation of logical reasoning, a critical skill in all disciplines.
Not all questions must be at a high cognitive level in order for a teacher’s performance to be rated at a high
level; that is, when exploring a topic, a teacher might begin with a series of questions of low cognitive challenge
to provide a review, or to ensure that everyone in the class is “on board.” Furthermore, if questions are at a high
level but only a few students participate in the discussion, the teacher’s performance on the component cannot
be judged to be at a high level. In addition, during lessons involving students in small-group work, the quality of
the students’ questions and discussion in their small groups may be considered as part of this component. In
order for students to formulate high-level questions, they must have learned how to do so. Therefore, high-level
questions from students, either in the full class or in small-group discussions, provide evidence that these skills
have been taught.
Indicators include:
● Questions of high cognitive challenge, formulated by both students and teacher
● Questions with multiple correct answers or multiple approaches, even when there is a single
correct response
● Effective use of student responses and ideas
● Discussion, with the teacher stepping out of the central, mediating role
● Focus on the reasoning exhibited by students in discussion, both in give-and-take with the
teacher and with their classmates
● High levels of student participation in discussion
A lesson in which students are engaged usually has a discernible structure (a beginning, a middle, and an end)
with scaffolding provided by the teacher or by the activities themselves. Student tasks are organized to provide
cognitive challenge, and then students are encouraged to reflect on what they have done and what they have
learned; the lesson has closure, in which teachers encourage students to derive the important learning from the
learning tasks, from the discussion, or from what they have read. Critical questions for an observer in
determining the degree of student engagement are “What are the students being asked to do? Does the
learning task involve thinking? Are students challenged to discern patterns or make predictions?” If the answer
to these questions is that students are, for example, filling in blanks on a worksheet or performing a rote
procedure, they are unlikely to be cognitively engaged.
In observing a lesson, it is essential not only to watch the teacher but also to pay close attention to the students
and what they are doing. The best evidence for student engagement is what students are saying and doing as a
consequence of what the teacher does, or has done, or has planned. And while students may be physically
active (e.g. using manipulative materials in mathematics or making a map in social studies), it is not essential
that they be involved in a hands-on manner; it is, however, essential that they be challenged to be “minds-on.”
Indicators include:
● Student enthusiasm, interest, thinking, problem solving, etc.
● Learning tasks that require high-level student thinking and invite students to explain their
thinking
● Students highly motivated to work on all tasks and persistent even when the tasks are
challenging
● Students actively “working,” rather than watching while their teacher “works”
● Suitable pacing of the lesson: neither dragged out nor rushed, with time for closure and student
reflection
A teacher’s actions in monitoring student learning, while they may superficially look the same as those used in
monitoring student behavior, have a fundamentally different purpose. When monitoring behavior, teachers are
alert to students who may be passing notes or bothering their neighbors; when monitoring student learning,
teachers look carefully at what students are writing, or listen carefully to the questions students ask, in order to
gauge whether they require additional activity or explanation to grasp the content. In each case, the teacher
may be circulating in the room, but his or her purpose in doing so is quite different in the two situations.
Similarly, on the surface, questions asked of students for the purpose of monitoring learning are fundamentally
different from those used to build understanding; in the former, the questions seek to reveal students’
misconceptions, whereas in the latter, the questions are designed to explore relationships or deepen
understanding. Indeed, for the purpose of monitoring, many teachers create questions specifically to elicit the
extent of student understanding and use additional techniques (such as exit tickets) to determine the degree of
understanding of every student in the class. Teachers at high levels of performance in this component, then,
demonstrate the ability to encourage students and actually teach them the necessary skills of monitoring their
own learning against clear standards.
But as important as monitoring student learning and providing feedback to students are, however, they are
greatly strengthened by a teacher’s skill in making mid-course corrections when needed, seizing on a “teachable
moment,” or enlisting students’ particular interests to enrich an explanation.
● Assessment criteria
○ It is essential that students know the criteria for assessment. At its highest level,
students themselves have had a hand in articulating the criteria (for example, of a clear
oral presentation).
● Monitoring of student learning
○ A teacher’s skill in eliciting evidence of student understanding is one of the true marks
of expertise. This is not a hit-or-miss effort, but is planned carefully in advance. Even
after planning carefully, however, a teacher must weave monitoring of student learning
seamlessly into the lesson, using a variety of techniques.
● Feedback to students
○ Feedback on learning is an essential element of a rich instructional environment;
without it, students are constantly guessing at how they are doing and at how their work
can be improved. Valuable feedback must be timely, constructive, and substantive and
must provide students the guidance they need to improve their performance.
● Student self-assessment and monitoring of progress
○ The culmination of students’ assumption of responsibility for their learning is when they
monitor their own learning and take appropriate action. Of course, they can do these
things only if the criteria for learning are clear and if they have been taught the skills of
checking their work against clear criteria.
Indicators include:
● The teacher paying close attention to evidence of student understanding
● The teacher posing specifically created questions to elicit evidence of student understanding
● The teacher circulating to monitor student learning and to offer feedback
● Students assessing their own work against established criteria
Indicators include:
● Incorporation of students’ interests and daily events into a lesson
● The teacher adjusting instruction in response to evidence of student understanding (or lack of it)
● The teacher seizing on a teachable moment
Standard #4
Professional Responsibility
Performance Indicators
4a Reflecting on Teaching
Reflecting on teaching encompasses the teacher’s thinking that follows any instructional event,
an analysis of the many decisions made in both the planning and the implementation of a lesson. By considering these
elements in light of the impact they had on student learning, teachers can determine where to focus their efforts in
making revisions and choose which aspects of the instruction they will continue in future lessons. Teachers may reflect on
their practice through collegial conversations, journal writing, examining student work, conversations with students, or
simply thinking about their teaching. Reflecting with accuracy and specificity, as well as being able to use in future
teaching what has been learned, is an acquired skill; mentors, coaches, and supervisors can help teachers acquire and
develop the skill of reflecting on teaching through supportive and deep questioning. Over time, this way of thinking both
reflectively and self- critically and of analyzing instruction through the lens of student learning—whether excellent,
adequate, or inadequate—becomes a habit of mind, leading to improvement in teaching and learning.
Indicators include:
● Accurate reflections on a lesson
● Citation of adjustments to practice that draw on a repertoire of strategies
Indicators include:
● Routines and systems that track student completion of assignments
● Systems of information regarding student progress against instructional outcomes
● Processes of maintaining accurate non-instructional records
Indicators include:
● Frequent and culturally appropriate information sent home regarding the instructional program
and student progress
● Two-way communication between the teacher and families
● Frequent opportunities for families to engage in the learning process
4d Participating in the Professional Community
Schools are, first of all, environments to promote the learning of students. But in promoting student learning,
teachers must work with their colleagues to share strategies, plan joint efforts, and plan for the success of
individual students. Schools are, in other words, professional organizations for teachers, with their full potential
realized only when teachers regard themselves as members of a professional community. This community is
characterized by mutual support and respect, as well as by recognition of the responsibility of all teachers to be
constantly seeking ways to improve their practice and to contribute to the life of the school. Inevitably, teachers’
duties extend beyond the doors of their classrooms and include activities related to the entire school or larger
district, or both. These activities include such things as school and district curriculum committees or
engagement with the parent-teacher organization. With experience, teachers assume leadership roles in these
activities.
Indicators include:
● Regular teacher participation with colleagues to share and plan for student success
● Regular teacher participation in professional courses or communities that emphasize improving
practice
● Regular teacher participation in school initiatives
● Regular teacher participation in and support of community initiatives
Indicators include:
● Frequent teacher attendance in courses and workshops; regular academic reading
● Participation in learning networks with colleagues; freely shared insights
● Participation in professional organizations supporting academic inquiry
4f Showing Professionalism
Expert teachers demonstrate professionalism in service both to students and to the profession. Teaching at the
highest levels of performance in this component is student focused, putting students first regardless of how this
stance might challenge long-held assumptions, past practice, or simply the easier or more convenient
procedure. Accomplished teachers have a strong moral compass and are guided by what is in the best interest
of each student. They display professionalism in a number of ways. For example, they conduct interactions with
colleagues in a manner notable for honesty and integrity. Furthermore, they know their students’ needs and can
readily access resources with which to step in and provide help that may extend beyond the classroom. Seeking
greater flexibility in the ways school rules and policies are applied, expert teachers advocate for their students in
ways that might challenge traditional views and the educational establishment. They also display
professionalism in the ways they approach problem solving and decision making, with student needs constantly
in mind. Finally, accomplished teachers consistently adhere to school and district policies and procedures but
are willing to work to improve those that may be outdated or ineffective.
Indicators include:
● The teacher having a reputation as being trustworthy and often sought as a sounding board
● The teacher frequently reminding participants during committee or planning work that students
are the highest priority
● The teacher supporting students, even in the face of difficult situations or conflicting policies
● The teacher challenging existing practice in order to put students first
● The teacher consistently fulfilling district mandates regarding policies and procedures