Updated: Oct 25, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan

Lecture 02

Design of One-way Slab System

(Part – II )
By:
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali
Civil Engineering Department
UET Peshawar

[email protected]
www.drqaisarali.com

Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II 1

Updated: Oct 25, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan

Design of 90′ X 60′ Hall

Option 2a

Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II 2

Updated: Oct 25, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan

Design of 90′ X 60′ Hall

 Solution [option 2a]

 Given Data
Dimensions of Hall : 90′ x 60′ (interior)

Story height, h = 20′

SDL: 3″ Mud layer and 2″ Tile layer

Live load: 40 psf

3 ksi

60 ksi

2.204 ksf

Required Data

Design the hall

Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II 3

Updated: Oct 25, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan

Design of 90′ X 60′ Hall

 Solution [option 2a]

 Step 1: Selection of Structural Configuration

Beams are supported

on walls

Beams are spaced at 10′ c/c

Girder

60′

Column

10′ 10′
Masonry wall
18″ thick

90′

Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II 4

Updated: Oct 25, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan

Design of 90′ X 60′ Hall

 Solution [option 2a]

 Step 1: Selection of Structural Configuration

60′
A A

10′ 10′

90′ End span Interior span

Assumed size of beam: 12″ x 24″ 10′ 10′

9.5′ 12′′ 9.0′
Assumed size of beam: 18″ x 36″
Section A-A
Assumed size of column: 18″ x 18″

Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II 5

Updated: Oct 25, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan

Design of 90′ X 60′ Hall

 Solution [option 2a]

 Slab Design

 Step 2: Selection of Sizes

5.4″. Finally take 6″ (Same as that of Part I of this lecture)

 Step 3: Calculation of Loads

0.214 ksf (Same as that of Part I of this lecture)

Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II 6

Updated: Oct 25, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan

Design of 90′ X 60′ Hall

 Solution [option 2a]

 Slab Design

 Step 4: Analysis
 Using ACI Approximate coefficients, the results obtained are shown in figure.
Wu = 0.214ksf

6"

0 1/11 1/12 1/12 1/16 1/12

1.5' L= 9.5' 1.0' L= 9.0' 1.0'

21.07
13.00
BMD
(in.kip)
0

17.33 17.33
18.31 18.31 [1]

[1] For calculating negative moments, ℓn shall be the average of the adjacent clear span lengths (ACI:6.5.2)

Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II 7

Updated: Oct 25, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan

Design of 90′ X 60′ Hall

 Solution [option 2a]

 Slab Design

 Step 5: Determination of flexural steel area

Calculate moment capacity provided by minimum reinforcement

, (Same as that of Part I of this lecture)

, is greater than all moments calculated in Step No 4. Hence

Minimum reinforcement governs.

Finally provide #3 @ 9″ c/c for both main and shrinkage bars.

Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II 8

Updated: Oct 25, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan

Design of 90′ X 60′ Hall

 Solution [option 2a]

 Slab Design

 Step 7: Drafting

Temperature Reinforcement
#3 @ 9″ c/c
A A

Main Reinforcement
#3 @ 9″ c/c
60′

90′

Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II 9

Updated: Oct 25, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan

Design of 90′ X 60′ Hall

 Solution [option 2a]

 Slab Design

 Step 7: Drafting

#3 @ 18"C/C #3 @ 18"C/C #3 @ 9"C/C #3 @ 18"C/C #3 @ 9"C/C

(Supporting bars) (Supporting bars)
2'-10" with hook 6'-0" 5'-8"

6"

#3 Bars @ 9"C/C #3 Bars @ 9"C/C #3 Bars @ 9"C/C #3 Bars @ 9"C/C

18" L= 9'-3'' 18" L= 8'-6" 18"

SLAB SECTION A-A

Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II 10

Updated: Oct 25, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan

Design of 90′ X 60′ Hall

 Solution [option 2a]

 Beam Design

 Step 2: Selection of Sizes

Assuming 12 width of beam, The minimum depth of beam for a one

end continuous beam is given by

Take

Effective depth,

Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II 11

Updated: Oct 25, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan

Design of 90′ X 60′ Hall

 Solution [option 2a]

 Beam Design

 Step 2: Selection of Sizes

Effective width of T- beam is minimum of:

99.75″

6″


21.5″
18″

As

12″
Therefore,

Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II 12

Updated: Oct 25, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan

Design of 90′ X 60′ Hall

 Solution [option 2a]

 Beam Design

 Step 3: Calculation of Loads

 Before performing any calculations for the load on a beam, it is

essential to understand the Structural Idealization.

 For this, please pay close attention to the animation in the upcoming
slides.

Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II 13

Updated: Oct 25, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan

Design of 90′ X 60′ Hall

 Structural Idealization

Part of slab on Girder

Beam

10′

Girder

Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II 14

Updated: Oct 25, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan

Design of 90′ X 60′ Hall

 Structural Idealization

Wall Support Girder Support Wall Support

Idealized Beam
10′

Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II 15

Updated: Oct 25, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan

Design of 90′ X 60′ Hall

 Structural Idealization
P P P P P P P P

Wall Support Column Column Wall Support

Support Support

Idealized Girder

Note that, Beam loads acting as a point

load “P” on Girder.

Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II 16

Updated: Oct 25, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan

Design of 90′ X 60′ Hall

 Solution [option 2a]

 Beam Design

 Step 3: Calculation of Loads

𝑇𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑦 𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑎, 𝐴

Now,

,
60′
,

30.75’
10′ 90′

Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II 17

Updated: Oct 25, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan

Design of 90′ X 60′ Hall

 Solution [option 2a]

 Beam Design

 Step 4: Analysis
Girder Wu = 2.41k/ft Beam
Load Wall
Diagram

0 1/11 1/9 1/9 1/11 0

1.5' L= 29.25' 1.5' L= 29.25' 1.5'

Shear 1 1.15 1.15 1

coefficients
35.25 30.94 40.53 35.57
14.63'
SFD (kip)
d
14.63'
35.57 40.53 35.25
30.94
2249.35 2249.35

BMD (in.kip)
0 0
2749.21 2749.21

Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II 18

Updated: Oct 25, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan

Design of 90′ X 60′ Hall

 Solution [option 2a]

 Beam Design

 Step 5: Determination of Reinforcement

Flexural Reinforcement and Detailing

Moment, in-kip 𝑨𝒔 , in2 𝑨𝒎𝒊𝒏 , in2 𝑨𝒎𝒂𝒙 , in2 Detailing

𝑀 + = 2249.35 1.96 0.86 3.47 3-#8

𝑀 (−)= 2749.21 2.7 0.86 3.47 4-#8

Shear Reinforcement and Detailing

𝑽𝒔 𝑽@𝒅 ∅𝑽𝒄 𝑺𝒅 𝑺𝒎𝒂𝒙 𝑺 taken
(k) (k) (k) (in.) (in.) (in.)
40.53 35.57 21.52 14.8 10.8 9
Provided reinforcement satisfies necessary shear checks

Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II 19

Updated: Oct 25, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan

Design of 90′ X 60′ Hall

 Solution [option 2a]

 Beam Design

 Step 6: Drafting
A B B A
#3 @ 9"c/c 4-#8 bars #3 @ 9"c/c
21'

24"

4-#8 bars 3-#8 bars

A B B A
18" L= 29'-3'' 18" L=29'-3" 18"

2- #8 bars 4-#8 bars

6" 6"

#3@9"c/c #3@9"c/c
18" 18"

3-#8 bars 34 - #8 bars

12" 12"
SECTION A-A SECTION B-B

Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II 20

Updated: Oct 25, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan

Design of 90′ X 60′ Hall

 Solution [option 2a]

 Girder Design

 Step 2: Selection of Sizes

, (for one end continuous members)

, (for both end continuous members)

Take h = 36″

60′
A A
Masonry Wall RC Column RC Column

1.5' ln= 29.25' 1.5' ln= 28.5' 1.5'

l1= 30.75' l2= 30'
SECTION A-A 30′ 30′ 30′

90′

Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II 21

Updated: Oct 25, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan

Design of 90′ X 60′ Hall

 Solution [option 2a]

 Girder Design

 Step 2: Selection of Sizes

Assume 18″ wide web . The effective width of T – beam, is

minimum of:
105.75″

6″


33.5″
30″

As

Therefore, 18″

Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II 22

Updated: Oct 25, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan

Design of 90′ X 60′ Hall

 Solution [option 2a]

 Girder Design

 Step 3: Calculation of Loads

 Beams load can be approximated as point loads on girder. The

uniformly distributed load on girder is coming from self weight of
girder rib plus weight of slab directly resting on girder.

Wall Beams Column Girder Column Slab Wall

1.5' L=29.25' 1.5' L= 28.5' 1.5' L= 30.75' 1.5'

PU PU PU PU PU PU PU PU
WU

L= 30.75' L= 30' L= 30.75'

Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II 23

Updated: Oct 25, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan

Design of 90′ X 60′ Hall

 Solution [option 2a]

 Girder Design

 Step 3: Calculation of Loads

 Since the girder is subject to both uniform and pointed loads, the
ACI coefficient method is not applicable here.

 For the analysis of such cases, any elastic analysis method, such as
the slope deflection method, moment distribution method, flexibility
method, stiffness method, etc., may be used.

Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II 24

Updated: Oct 25, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan

Design of 90′ X 60′ Hall

 Solution [option 2a]

 Girder Design

 Step 3: Calculation of Loads

 P is the point load on girder and is the reaction coming from the
interior support of beam due to factored load. From below figure;
P = 2(40.53) = 81.1k
Wu = 2.41k/ft

0 1/11 1/9 1/9 1/11 1/12

1.5' L= 29.25' 1.5' L= 29.25' 1.5'

1 1.15 1.15 1.15

35.25 30.94 40.53

d
14.63'
40.53 35.25

Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II 25

Updated: Oct 25, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan

Design of 90′ X 60′ Hall

 Solution [option 2a]

 Girder Design

 Step 3: Calculation of Loads

Part of slab on girder

Part of slab on Girder

hf =6"
10′

hw=30"

Girder

bw=18"

Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II 26

Updated: Oct 25, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan

Design of 90′ X 60′ Hall

 Solution [option 2a]

 Girder Design

 Step 3: Calculation of Loads

Self weight of girder can be calculated as follows
Part of slab on girder

hf =6"
Load from part of slab on girder is given by

,
hw=30"

Now,

, bw=18"

Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II 27

Updated: Oct 25, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan

Design of 90′ X 60′ Hall

 Solution [option 2a]

 Girder Design

 Step 4: Analysis
81.1k 81.1k 81.1k 81.1k 81.1k 81.1k 81.1k 81.1k
1k/ft 1k/ft 1k/ft

A B C D E F G H I J
10.75' 10' 10' 10' 10' 10' 10' 10' 10.75'
71.97k 297.83k 297.83k 71.97k
96 120.73
71.97 86 110.53
61.73
29.52
5 19.27
0 0
SFD (k)
19.27 5
29.52
110.53 86 71.97
120.73 96

668.5 668.5

424.55 424.55
190.55
178.1 178.1
0 0
BMD (k.ft)

731.95 731.95

Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II 28

Updated: Oct 25, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan

Design of 90′ X 60′ Hall

 Solution [option 2a]

 Girder Design

 Step 5: Determination of Flexural Reinforcement

 The required areas of steel for the maximum bending moments at

key points are tabulated below.
Mu d b As Asmin Asmax
Location Detailing
(kip-ft) (in.) (in.) (in2) (in2) (in2)

Exterior + 668.5 33.5 105.75 4.5 2.01 8.11 (3+3) - #8

Interior − 731.95 33.5 18 5.43 2.01 8.11 (5+2) - #8

Interior + 190.55 33.5 105.75 1.26 2.01 8.11 3 - #8

5.43 in2 5.43 in2

A 4.5 in2 D 2.01 in2 G 4.5 in2 J

Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II 29

Updated: Oct 25, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan

Design of 90′ X 60′ Hall

 Solution [option 2a]

 Girder Design

 Step 6: Determination of Shear Reinforcement

 Design shear capacity of reinforced concrete is given by

 Because shear force values abruptly change at each key point,

calculating spacing for each demand shear is time consuming and
tedious.

 Therefore, we will adopt a different strategy in this case.

Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II 30

Updated: Oct 25, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan

Design of 90′ X 60′ Hall

 Solution [option 2a]

 Girder Design

 Step 6: Determination of Shear Reinforcement

Calculate maximum spacing using #3 bar as stirrup.

𝑠 = 14.6"

Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II 31

Updated: Oct 25, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan

Design of 90′ X 60′ Hall

 Solution [option 2a]

 Girder Design

 Step 6: Determination of Shear Reinforcement

The design shear capacity provided by stirrups using the maximum

spacing is calculated as;

Now, the overall design shear capacity of the girder is given by

It means that maximum spacing of 14.6″ as permitted by ACI governs

between point A and C. Finally, #3@ 9″ c/c will be provided.

Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II 32

Updated: Oct 25, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan

Design of 90′ X 60′ Hall

 Solution [option 2a]

 Girder Design

 Step 6: Determination of Shear Reinforcement

Calculate spacing for shear reinforcement between point C and E.

𝑽𝒎𝒂𝒙 𝑽@𝒅 ∅𝑽𝒄 𝑺𝒅 𝑺𝒎𝒂𝒙 𝑺 taken
Location
(k) (k) (k) (in.) (in.) (in.)
CD 120.73 117.5 49.54 4.9 14.6 4.5
DE 96 94 49.54 7.5 14.6 4.5
Provided shear reinforcement satisfies necessary shear checks

A B C D E F G H I J
S = 9" S = 4.5" S = 9" S = 4.5" S = 9"

96 120.73
71.97 86 110.53
61.73
29.52
5 19.27
SFD 0 0
(kip) 19.27 5
29.52
110.53 86 71.97
96
120.73

Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II 33

Updated: Oct 25, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan

Design of 90′ X 60′ Hall

 Solution [option 2a]

 Girder Design

 Step 7: Drafting

A B C D
20'-9" 20'-9"

#3@9" c/c #[email protected]" c/c #3@9"c/c #[email protected]" c/c #3@9" c/c

3'-8" 3'-8"
A B C D
19'-3" 10' 9'-6" 9'-6" 9'-6" 10' 19'-3"

2- #8 bars (5+2)- #8 bars (5+2)- #8 bars 2 - #8 bars

6" 6" 6" 6"

#3@9"c/c #[email protected]"c/c #[email protected]"c/c #3@9"c/c

30" 30" 30" 30"

(3+3) - #8 bars (3+3) - #8 bars 3 - #8 bars 3 - #8 bars

18" 18" 18" 18"

SECTION A-A SECTION B-B SECTION C-C SECTION D-D

Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II 34

Updated: Oct 25, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan

Design of 90′ X 60′ Hall

 Solution [option 2a]

 Column Design
18″
 Given Data

 Size of column :
18″
 Factored load = 297.8 kips (Reaction at the interior support)

 Service load = 234 kips (Reaction at the support due to service load)

 Compressive strength of concrete,

 Yield Tensile strength of steel,

Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II 35

Updated: Oct 25, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan

Design of 90′ X 60′ Hall

 Solution [option 2a]

 Column Design

 Step 1 Determination of Main longitudinal reinforcement

Calculate design axial capacity of column by assuming 1% steel area

and compare the calculated capacity with demand axial load

Assuming ;

OK!

Therefore, (8 - #6 bars)

Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II 36

Updated: Oct 25, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan

Design of 90′ X 60′ Hall

 Solution [option 2a]

 Column Design

 Step 2 Determination of Spacing for shear reinforcement

Using #3 bar with

𝐴 𝑓
i. = 0.22 x 60,000/ (50x18) = 14.7″
50𝑏
𝐴 𝑓
ii. = 0.22 x 60,000 / (0.75 x18) = 17.9″
0.75 𝑓 ′𝑏
iii. 16 of longitudinal bar = 16 x 0.75 = 12″
iv. 48 of tie bar = 48 x 3/8 = 18″
v. Smallest dimension of member = 18″

. Finally use #3 ties @ 9″ c/c

Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II 37

Updated: Oct 25, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan

Design of 90′ X 60′ Hall

 Solution [option 2a]

 Column Design
Beam

#3@9ʺ c/c
18ʺ A

8- #6 bars

18ʺ
Section A-A h Lap Splice
B

#3@9ʺ c/c
18ʺ

8- #6 bars #3@9ʺ c/c

8- #6 bars
18ʺ
Section B-B

Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II 38

Updated: Oct 25, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan

Design of 90′ X 60′ Hall

 Solution [option 2a]

 Footing Design

 Given Data
 Size of column : 18″ x 18″

 Factored load = 297.8 kips

 Service load = 234 kips

 Compressive strength of concrete,

 Yield Tensile strength of steel,

 Allowable bearing capacity of soil,

 Depth of footing from base level,

Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II 39

Updated: Oct 25, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan

Design of 90′ X 60′ Hall

 Solution [option 2a]

 Footing Design

STEP WISE ANALYSIS

Estimation of footing thickness and davg Design pressure qu

d avg = 20.50 in qu = 2.034 ksf

Overburden pressure Punching shear force Vup

W= 0.600 ksf Vup = 276.9 kip

Effective bearing capacity Check for Punching Shear

qe = 1.604 ksf ФVcp = 518.7 kip →OK!

Bearing Area Calculation of Maximum Moment Mu

Areq = 145.89sq.ft (B = 12' - 2'') Mu = 4148.034 in.kip

Critical shear Parameter

bo = 154.00 in

Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II 40

Updated: Oct 25, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan

Design of 90′ X 60′ Hall

 Solution [option 2a]

 Footing Design
Using Direct Method;

Now,
,

, ,

Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II 41

Updated: Oct 25, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan

Design of 90′ X 60′ Hall

 Solution [option 2a]

 Footing Design

Using #4 bar with

Check for maximum bar spacing

″ ″= ″

Provided spacing is OK!

Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II 42

Updated: Oct 25, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan

Design of 90′ X 60′ Hall

 Solution [option 2a]

 Footing Design

For crack control, the maximum spacing between the adjacent bars
shall not exceed (Table 24.3.2).

Provided spacing of 4.5 is OK.

Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II 43

Updated: Oct 25, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan

Design of 90′ X 60′ Hall

 Solution [option 2a]

 Footing Design

FFL Column 18"x18"

3'-0" 3" clear cover

11'-8"
12'-2"

(each side)
#4 @ 4.5" c/c
A A

2'-0"

P.C.C 1:4:8
11'-8" 11'-8"
12'-2" 12'-2"

FOOTING PLAN FOOTING DETAILS (A-A)

Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II 44

Updated: Oct 25, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan

Design of 90′ X 60′ Hall

Option 2b

Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II 45

Updated: Oct 25, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan

Design of 90′ X 60′ Hall

 Solution [option 2b]

 Step 1: Selection of Structural Configuration

Beams are supported

on columns

Centerline of beams

60′

Brick masonry wall

9″ thick

All beams are spaced

at 10′ c/c.

90′

Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II 46

Updated: Oct 25, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan

Design of 90′ X 60′ Hall

 Solution [option 2b]

 Step 1: Selection of Structural Configuration

C1 C2
60′

C3

90′

Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II 47

Updated: Oct 25, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan

Design of 90′ X 60′ Hall

 Solution [option 2b]

 Slab Design

 As seen in the figure, each slab panel is now 10 feet by 30 feet as

opposed to the previous case. Because the design of a one-way slab
is only dependent on the short side, the slab analysis and design will
remain unchanged.
Summary of Slab Design
Sizes Loads Analysis ∅𝑴𝒏,𝒎𝒊𝒏 Detailing of reinforcement
h, in. Wu, (ksf) Moment, in. kip (in. kip) (main and shrinkage)

hmin = 4.8″ 𝑀 , = 21.07

Take h = 4.8″ 𝑊 = 0.214 𝑀 , = 18.31 33.95 #3 @9″ c/c

𝑀 , = 13.0

Drafting is same as in Option 2a

Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II 48

Updated: Oct 25, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan

Design of 90′ X 60′ Hall

 Solution [option 2b]

 Frame Design

 2D frame can be detached from a 3D system as follows

90′ Wu = 2.41 k/ft

29.25′ 29.25′

60′ 20′

10′

Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II 49

Updated: Oct 25, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan

Design of 90′ X 60′ Hall

 Solution [option 2b]

 Frame Design

 Analysis for Beam (using ACI Moment Coefficients)

Wu = 2.41 k/ft 1767 in.kip 1546 in.kip

1/14 1/14

1/16 1/16
29.25′ 29.25′
1546 in.kip 1546 in.kp
20′ =

1/9
2749 in.kip

Note: The interior support conditions of the beam (whether supported on a column
or a roller) have no effect on the analysis results.

Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II 50

Updated: Oct 25, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan

Design of 90′ X 60′ Hall

 Solution [option 2b]

 Frame Design

 Analysis for Girder

90′

40 k 81 k 81 k 81 k 81 k 81 k 81 k 81 k 81 k 40 k

1.0 k/ft

10′ 10′ 10′ 10′ 10′ 10′ 10′ 10′ 10′

60′
20′ 20′ 20′ 20′

10′ 10′

Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II 51

Updated: Oct 25, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan

Design of 90′ X 60′ Hall

 Solution [option 2b]

 Frame Design

 Analysis for Girder

Mu (Exterior +) = 614.64

40 k 81 k 81 k 81 k 81 k 81 k 81 k 81 k 81 k 40 k
Mu (Interior+) = 217.96
1.0 k/ft

10′ 10′ 10′ 10′ 10′ 10′ 10′ 10′ 10′

20′ 20′ 20′

Mu (Interior -)
= 726.03

Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II 52

Updated: Oct 25, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan

Design of 90′ X 60′ Hall

 Solution [option 2b]

 Frame Design

Design of Beam for Flexure

Moment b d As As,min As,max

Location Detailing
in.kip in. in. in2 in2 in2
Exterior support (-) 1546 12 21.5 1.42 --- 3.47 4 - #6

Midspan (+) 1767 99.75 21.5 1.53 0.86 3.47 4 - #8

Interior Support (-) 2749 12 21.5 2.70 0.86 3.47 2 - #8

Design of Beam for Shear (same as in option 2a)

𝑽𝒔 𝑽@𝒅 ∅𝑽𝒄 𝑺𝒅 𝑺𝒎𝒂𝒙 𝑺 taken
(k) (k) (k) (in.) (in.) (in.)

40.53 35.57 21.52 14.8 10.8 9

Provided reinforcement satisfies necessary shear checks

Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II 53

Updated: Oct 25, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan

Design of 90′ X 60′ Hall

 Solution [option 2b]

 Frame Design

Design of Girder for Flexure

Mu d b As As,min As,max
Location Detailing
(in.kip) (in.) (in.) (in2) (in2) (in2)

Exterior + 7375.64 33.5 105.75 4.13 3.01 8.11 6 - #8

Interior − 8712.36 33.5 18 5.38 3.01 8.11 7 - #8

Design
 Interior + of Girder for
2615.52 33.5Shear
105.75 1.45 3.01 8.11 2 - #8

The Shear reinforcement remain the same as in Option 2a.

Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II 54

Updated: Oct 25, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan

Design of 90′ X 60′ Hall

 Solution [option 2b]

 Column Design

 Column C1 is concentric, and its design is the same as in the

previous case. (slides 34–37). Columns C2 and C3 are uniaxially
eccentric, so they will be designed using Design Aids.

 Design C2 by yourself. Design of C3 is carried out in the subsequent

slides

C1
60′
C2

C3

90′

Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II 55

Updated: Oct 25, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan

Design of 90′ X 60′ Hall

 Solution [option 2b]

 Column Design

 Analysis of C3 35.25 kip

1546.43 in.kip
0 Pu Mu 0
90′

30′

C1 C2 20′

30′
C3

0 0
AFD (k) BMD (in.kip)
35.25 k

Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II 56

Updated: Oct 25, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan

Design of 90′ X 60′ Hall

 Solution [option 2b]

 Column Design
 Determination of Longitudinal reinforcement
Taking b = h = 18″ and Assuming

The relevant Design Aid from the Appendix is DA – 2.

Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II 57

Updated: Oct 25, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan

Design of 90′ X 60′ Hall

 Solution [option 2b]

 Column Design
 Determination of Longitudinal reinforcement
4. Read from the graph

Using #8 bar with Ab = 0.79 in2

No. of bars =

Hence Provide 12 - #8 bars

Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II 58

Updated: Oct 25, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan

Design of 90′ X 60′ Hall

 Solution [option 2b]

 Column Design
 Determination of Spacing for Shear Reinforcement
Using #3 bar with

i. 𝐴 𝑓 = 0.22 x 60,000/ (50x18) = 14.7″

50𝑏
𝐴 𝑓
ii. = 0.22 x 60,000 / (0.75 x18) = 17.9″
0.75 𝑓 ′𝑏
iii. 16 of longitudinal bar = 16 x 1 = 16″
iv. 48 of tie bar = 48 x 3/8 = 18″
v. Smallest dimension of member = 18″
. Finally use #3 ties @ 15″ c/c

Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II 59

Updated: Oct 25, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan

Design of 90′ X 60′ Hall

 Solution
 Column Design (Drafting)
Beam

#3@15ʺ c/c
18ʺ A

8- #8 bars

18ʺ
Section A-A h Lap Splice
B

#3@15ʺ c/c
18ʺ

8- #8 bars #3@15ʺ c/c

8 - #8 bars
18ʺ
Section B-B

Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II 60

Updated: Oct 25, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan

Design of 90′ X 60′ Hall

 Solution [option 2b]

 Footing Design

 Design of footing for the column C1 has already been done (refer to
slides 38 to 43).

 Design footing for column C2 by yourself.

 A summarized design of footing for C3 is shown on next slides.

Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II 61

Updated: Oct 25, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan

Design of 90′ X 60′ Hall

 Solution [option 2b]

 Footing Design

 Given Data for C3

 Size of column :
18″
 Factored load = 35.25 kip

 Service load = 27.42 kip

18″
 Compressive strength of concrete,

 Yield Tensile strength of steel,

 Allowable bearing capacity of soil,

 Depth of footing from base level,

Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II 62

Updated: Oct 25, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan

Design of 90′ X 60′ Hall

 Solution [option 2b]

 Footing Design

 Analysis of C3 – Footing

STEP WISE ANALYSIS

Estimation of footing thickness and davg Design pressure qu

davg = 11.50 in qu = 2.097 ksf

Overburden pressure Punching shear force V up

W= 0.563 ksf Vup = 22.6 kip

Effective bearing capacity Check for Punching Shear

qe = 1.642 ksf ФVcp = 223.0 kip →OK!

Bearing Area Calculation of Maximum Moment Mu

Areq = 16.7sq.ft (B = 4' - 2'') Mu = 87.179 in.kip

Critical shear Parameter

bo = 118.00 in

Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II 63

Updated: Oct 25, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan

Design of 90′ X 60′ Hall

 Solution [option 2b]

 Footing Design
Using Direct Method;

Now,
,

, ,

Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II 64

Updated: Oct 25, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan

Design of 90′ X 60′ Hall

 Solution [option 2b]

 Footing Design

Using #4 bar with

Maximum spacing shall not exceed the lesser of 3h or 18″.

Also, for crack control spacing shall not exceed the following

Provided spacing is OK. Finally provide #4@6″ c/c.

Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II 65

Updated: Oct 25, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan

Design of 90′ X 60′ Hall

 Solution [option 2b]

 Footing Design

FFL Column 18"x18"

3'-0" 3" clear cover

(each side)
4'-2"
3'-8"

#4@6" c/c
A A

2'-0"

P.C.C 1:4:8
3'-8" 3'-8"
4'-2" 4'-2"

FOOTING PLAN FOOTING DETAILS (A-A)

Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II 66

Updated: Oct 25, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan

References

 Design of Concrete Structures 14th / 15th edition by Nilson, Darwin and

Dolan.

 Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-19)

Figure 9

Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II 67

Updated: Oct 25, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan

Appendix

 DESIGN AIDS (DA – 1 )

INTERACTION DIAGRAM DA-1 h
h
f /c= 3 ksi
2.2 g = 0.08
fy = 60ksi
 = 0.6
0.07
2.0
Kmax

0.06
1.8 Pn
e

0.05
1.6

0.04
1.4 fs/fy = 0
∅𝑓 𝐴

0.03
𝑃

1.2
𝐾 =

0.02 0.25
1.0
0.01

0.8 0.50

0.6
0.75

0.4

0.2 1.0

0.0
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45
𝑃𝑒
𝑅 =
∅𝑓 𝐴 ℎ

Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II 68

Updated: Oct 25, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan

Appendix

 DESIGN AIDS (DA – 2 )

INTERACTION DIAGRAM, DA-2 h
h
g= 0.08 f /c= 3 ksi
2.2
fy = 60 ksi
0.07  = 0.7
2.0
Kmax
0.06
1.8 Pn
e
0.05
1.6
0.04 fs/fy = 0
1.4
0.03
∅𝑓 𝐴
𝑃

1.2
0.25
𝐾 =

0.02

1.0
0.01
0.50
0.8

0.75
0.6

0.4
1.0

0.2

0.0
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50
𝑃𝑒
𝑅 =
∅𝑓 𝐴 ℎ

Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II 69

Updated: Oct 25, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan

Appendix

 DESIGN AIDS (DA – 3 )

INTERACTION DIAGRAM , DA-3 h
h
g= 0.08 f /c = 3 ksi
2.2
fy = 60 ksi
0.07  = 0.8
2.0
Kmax
0.06
1.8 Pn
e
0.05
1.6
fs/fy = 0
0.04
1.4
0.03
∅𝑓 𝐴

0.25
𝑃

1.2
𝐾 =

0.02

1.0
0.01 0.50

0.8
0.75

0.6

0.4 1.0

0.2

0.0
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50 0.55 0.60
𝑃𝑒
𝑅 =
∅𝑓 𝐴 ℎ

Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II 70

Updated: Oct 25, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan

Appendix

 DESIGN AIDS (DA – 4 )

INTERACTION DIAGRAM , DA-4 h
g = 0.08 h
f /c= 3 ksi
2.2
fy = 60 ksi
0.07  = 0.9
2.0
Kmax
0.06
1.8 Pn
e
0.05

1.6 fs/fy = 0
0.04

1.4
0.03
0.25
∅𝑓 𝐴
𝑃

1.2
𝐾 =

0.02

1.0 0.50
0.01

0.8
0.75

0.6
1.0

0.4

0.2

0.0
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50 0.55 0.60 0.65
𝑃𝑒
𝑅 =
∅𝑓 𝐴 ℎ

Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II 71

Updated: Oct 25, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan

Appendix

 DESIGN AIDS (DA – 5 )

INTERACTION DIAGRAM , DA-5 h
h
f /c= 4 ksi
g = 0.08
1.8 fy = 60 ksi
 = 0.6
0.07
1.6 Kmax

0.06
e Pn
1.4 0.05

0.04
1.2 fs/fy = 0
0.03
∅𝑓 𝐴
𝑃

1.0 0.02
𝐾 =

0.25
0.01

0.8
0.50

0.6

0.75
0.4

1.0
0.2

0.0
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35
𝑃𝑒
𝑅 =
∅𝑓 𝐴 ℎ

Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II 72

Updated: Oct 25, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan

Appendix

 DESIGN AIDS (DA – 6 )

INTERACTION DIAGRAM , DA-6 h
h
f /c= 4 ksi
g = 0.08
1.8 fy = 60ksi

0.07
 = 0.7
1.6 Kmax
0.06

e Pn
1.4 0.05

0.04
fs/fy = 0
1.2
0.03
∅𝑓 𝐴
𝑃

1.0 0.02
0.25
𝐾 =

0.01

0.8
0.50

0.6
0.75

0.4
1.0

0.2

0.0
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40
𝑃𝑒
𝑅 =
∅𝑓 𝐴 ℎ

Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II 73

Updated: Oct 25, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan

Appendix

 DESIGN AIDS (DA – 7 )

INTERACTION DIAGRAM , DA-7 h
h
g = 0.08 f /c= 4 ksi
1.8 fy = 60 ksi
0.07  = 0.8

1.6 Kmax
0.06

e Pn
0.05
1.4

0.04 fs/fy = 0

1.2
0.03
∅𝑓 𝐴

0.25
𝑃

1.0 0.02
𝐾 =

0.01
0.50
0.8

0.6 0.75

1.0
0.4

0.2

0.0
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45
𝑃𝑒
𝑅 =
∅𝑓 𝐴 ℎ

Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II 74

Updated: Oct 25, 2023 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan

Appendix

 DESIGN AIDS (DA – 8 )

INTERACTION DIAGRAM , DA-8 h
h
g= 0.08 f /c= 4 ksi
1.8 fy = 60 ksi
0.07  = 0.9

1.6 0.06 Kmax

e Pn
0.05
1.4
fs/fy = 0
0.04

1.2
0.03
0.25
∅𝑓 𝐴

0.02
𝑃

1.0
𝐾 =

0.01 0.50
0.8

0.75
0.6

1.0
0.4

0.2

0.0
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50
𝑃𝑒
𝑅 =
∅𝑓 𝐴 ℎ

Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 416: Reinforced Concrete Design – II 75