PR Study Case
PR Study Case
PR Study Case
Board of Ethics and Professional Standards Code of Ethics Case Study Series
3. Identify key values. Honesty We adhere to the highest standards of accuracy and truth in advancing the interests of those we represent and in communicating with the public. Independence We are accountable for our actions. Loyalty We are faithful to those we represent, while honoring our obligation to serve the public interest. Fairness We deal fairly with clients, employees, employers, competitors, peers, vendors, the media and the general public. 4. Identify the parties who will be affected by the decision and define the public relations professions obligation to each. WWC management and employees Newtown News and other media S&S employees
5. Select ethical principles to guide the decision. The core principle of the Safeguarding Confidences section of the PRSA Code of Ethics Code Provisions is: Client trust requires appropriate protection of confidential and private information. The intent of this provision is: To protect the privacy rights of clients, organizations and individuals by safeguarding confidential information. A guideline under this provision stipulates that a member shall: Immediately advise an appropriate authority if a member discovers that confidential information is being divulged by an employee of a client company or organization. 6. Make a decision and justify. The clients interests are paramount in this case. The client should be immediately informed of the information leak by the S&S president. The circumstances should be explained regarding the tipsy staffer and the presence of the newspaper editor. The agency president and the client should determine the next step, which might include making an early announcement of the product launch to nail down the market possibilities. A more sensitive course of action would be to ask the editor to curtail the information until a later date in the best interest of WWC, its employees and the citizens of Newtown. If your relationship is good, this might work, in return for giving the editor a jump on the story. Since a non-disclosure statement was signed by the junior staff member and the agency had pledged not to disclose information, there are possibly legalities involved that could make the agency responsible for any loss of future market share, at the worst. Loss of the account is also highly likely. Unfortunately, the budding staffer would have to be discharged so that other staff members would realize that they must keep information on a confidential basis.