Rkud 4142 (Group 4)

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 20

Mu’tazilah on

Reason & Revelation


“ A FOCUS ON WĀṢIL IBN ‘ĀṬĀ”

RKUD 4142 Philosophy & Ilm al-Kalam Group 4


Group Members

NURUL KHADIJA BINTI RODZUAN (2110904)

ZULAIKHA BINTI MOHD RAZALI (2117348)

QURRATUL AIN BINTI KHALID (2010092)

TASNEEM NAILOUFAR BINTI MOHD SAYYIDI (2115286)


02
01 BIOGRAPHICAL &
INTRODUCTION INTELLECTUAL
BACKGROUND

T a b l e o f Co n t e nt
04
03
REASON AND REVELATION: CONCLUSION
WĀṢIL’S IMPACT ON
MU‘TAZILITE THEOLOGY
INTRODUCTION
The first rationalist theological school in the history of
Islamic thought, emerged in the early centuries of Islam.
Originating in Basrah and later flourishing in Baghdad,
particularly during the caliphate of al-Ma’mun from 813 to
833 CE
Interpreted the dogmas of religion in the light of human
reason, which contradicted mainstream Muslim beliefs.
Reason as their primary source of knowledge, followed by
revelation, Quran and Sunnah.
Wāṣil ibn ʿAṭā, who is widely recognized and credited as
the founder of the Mu’tazila school
how he influenced the development of Mu’tazilah's
distinctive approach to reason and revelation.
Biographical &
Intellectual
background
BIOGRAPHY
Abu Hudhaifah Wāṣil Ibn ʿĀṭā’ Al-ghazzāl,
born around 700 (80 AH) in Medina, and
passed away in Basrah in 748 (131 AH)
A prominent Muslim theologian and jurist
He initially studied under Abu Hashim
`Abd Allah ibn Muhammad ibn
al‑Hanafiyyah, the grandson of Ali, which
provided him the foundation in various
Islamic teachings.
He later travel to Basra in Iraq to study
under Hasan of Basra (one of the Tabi‘in)
and engaged with other influential
religious figures who lived there.
He was unafraid to have a different opinion
from his own teacher, if according to him
the thought is not in accordance with his
vision.
This bold approach is particularly evident
in his view of the 'manzilah bayna
manzilatayn' issue.
In Basra he began to formulate the
ideologies that led to the Muʿtazilite school
These rational thought of his, stemmed
from conflicts and theological debates
intertwined with politics at that time.
His work include: Kitab al‑Manzilah baina
al‑Manzilatain, Kitab al‑Futya, Kitab fi al-
Tauhid wa al-‘Adl, and many more.
His experiences with the complexities of
theology and politics of his time provided
the foundation for Mu'tazilah’s focus on
reason and revelation.
Wāṣil’s exposure to the intellectually
stimulating environment in Basra were
crucial in shaping his rational thought
which later also shaped the foundational
principles of Mu'tazilah.
WĀṢIL’s FOUNDATIONAL
TEACHINGS

the denial of God’s human free the Intermediate Position Unestablished


attributes will of Grave Sinners errors
Wāṣil ibn ‘āṭā Wāṣil asserts A person who The belief suggests
emphasizes the that individuals commits major sins is that one party was
fundamental distinction have the ability not considered a in error among the
between God's essence to choose sincere believer, but if opposing parties in
and creatures, rejecting between good they believe in the the Battle of Siffin
eternal qualities and and evil, making Islamic faith, they are and among
stating that God's them not unbelievers and Uthman's
perfection stems directly accountable for face mild assassinators and
from His essence. their actions. punishment. allies.
While we acknowledge that Wāṣils theological ideas initially was
rather in an unsystematic fashion and did not fully address the
complexities of divine attributes, it is important to recognize the
pioneering nature of his thoughts

Wāṣil’s students played a role in further refining and expanding


upon these ideas. Exp: Abu al‑Hudhail `Allaf, his indirect student.

While Wāṣils doctrinal formulations may have been unsystematic


during his time they provided coherence to the Muʿtazilah faction
as a religious sect
Contribution to Islamic Thought

gathered many devoted believers and sent


Islamic Society missionaries to spread Mu’tazilah thoughts.

It challenged prevailing Greek philosophies and


other foreign elements and influenced the
emergence of other theological schools; Ashariites
Islamic History
school.
initially met with resistance, but eventually played
a role in shaping the beliefs of Islamic reformers in
the 19th and 20th centuries.

Intellectual His thought, which focusing on reasoning in


religious matters has provided a framework to
Tradition
address contemporary challenges.
Relevance to
present times
In the field of science and technology,
Wāṣil ibn ‘āṭā ’s thoughts are far more
relevant when compared to the ideas
of other schools of thought.
freedom to use reason as human
superiority.
The power of reason that was
advocated by Wāṣil ibn ‘āṭā , remains a
pertinent aspect to address current
issues.
Reason and
Revelation:
Wāṣil’s Impact
on Mu‘tazilite
Thought
Wāṣil's Perspective on
Reason and Revelation
Understanding
Human Capacity Role of Reason
Revelation
Wāṣil emphasized the capacity of A central aspect of Wāṣil’s thought
Wāṣil highlighted the significance
human beings to think and choose was that reason functions as a guide
of reason and rational inquiry in
which distinguish humans from other for moral choices and actions. He
understanding God’s will and the
entities in the world. He justified this contends that reason plays a crucial
principles of Islam. He argued
stance by asserting that reason is role in human accountability for
that through reason alone, one
essential for determine between actions. He stressed the role of
can recognize the Quran and
what is right and wrong, and without reason in comprehending revealed
Sunnah as revealed sources.
reasoning, one cannot differentiate sources, considering human reason
between good and bad. as a gift to interpret divine
teachings; quran and hadith.
Analysis of Wāṣil's Thought on
"The Issue of Grave Sinner"

Before Wāṣil ibn ‘Āṭā’s stance, there were already three different opinions on the issue.
Khawarij believed that one who committed major sin was no longer a believer and hence
had to be treated as unbeliever. Murji’ah believe that the grave sinner is still believer in all
sense, because committing a major sin is nothing to do with his faith. Ahl al-sunnah believe
that the grave sinner is still believer but by committing such sin his faith would weaken until
he repents.

Wāṣil ibn ‘Āṭā had come up with a new moderate opinion which is one who commits a
grave sin is neither a believer nor an unbeliever but occupies an intermediate position as
fasiq. On this very account, that Wasil withdrew himself from Imam Hasan al‑Basri and
earned the title ’Mu'tazilah’.

This doctrine stipulated that grave sinners would be expelled from the circle of the believers
but would nevertheless not be counted among the disbelievers. Those who were in this state
in between would receive permanent punishment but lighter than that of disbelievers.
Analysis of Wāṣil's Thought on
"The Issue of Grave Sinner"
His belief is that the expression “true believer” is one which means praise. The person who
commits grave sins can never deserve such praise; therefore, he cannot be called a true
believer because faith requires obedience to God, not just confession and justification. Such
a person has, nevertheless, still believe in the Islamic faith and believe that God alone is
worthy of being worshipped; therefore, he also cannot be regarded as an absolute unbeliever
either.

Only, if he dies before repenting, he will be put in hell and remain in it forever, because in the
afterlife there are only two options, namely heaven and hell. Believers go to heaven and
unbelievers go to hell. But, a fasiq person is sent to hell, only the punishment is lighter than a
kafir. It seems that he wants to encourage people not to underestimate sinful acts, especially
major sins.

The issue of ‘Manzilah bayna manzilatayn’ was purely an intellectual discourse and not even
based on evidence from Qur’an or Sunnah and it becomes the first seed on the basis of
which all later principles of Mu‘tazilah had evolved.
Mu'tazilah's Stand on
Reason and Revelation

Reconciliation Freedom of Stand on


Intellectual
of Reason and Priority to Reason Thought Revealed Sources
Commitment
Revelation
They question They insist on the In the 2nd and 3rd Their approach in
They viewed reason as
established beliefs obligatory nature of centuries of Hijrah, they interpreting Qur’anic
the ultimate arbitrator of
reflected their preference theoretical knowledge were pioneers in verses was influenced by
right and wrong,
for reason over tradition. gained through reasoning, advocating human free their five principles as a
reconciling it with divine
They sought an emphasizing that will and freedom of guide to determine the
revelations. They viewed
intellectually grounded understanding the thought. They asserted intended meaning of
revelation not as
understanding of Islam, existence and oneness of that human reason can these verses. The same
contradictory but as a
questioning traditional God, while supported by rule on matters of Halal goes with prophetic
supplement to reason,
practices to arrive at a revealed sources, can only and Haram, which hadiths. They judge
positioning reason as the
more reasoned be comprehended contradicted with hadiths with reason as
primary source of
interpretation of religious through human reason, traditional Sunni they asserted that
knowledge and
scriptures. justifying their hierarchy of legislative human reasoning could
evidence.
prioritization of reason. sources. override certain hadiths.
Conclusion
In summary, Wāṣil's profound
influence on Mu‘tazilite theology laid
the groundwork for a rationalistic
interpretation of Islam, prioritizing
reason alongside revelation and
challenging established norms in
pursuit of an intellectually rooted
understanding of religious principles.
References
Amilah Awang Abd Rahman, Between the Classical Mu’tazilites and Neo-Mutazilites: An Analysis of Harun Nasution’s Modern Islamic
Thought in Indonesia, Journal of Nusantara Studies, Vol. 5(1), 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol5iss1pp336-355

Mir Valiuddin. A History of Muslim Philosophy Volume 1, Book 3, Chapter 10: Mu’tazalism”, Al-Islam.org, n.d. https://www.al-islam.org/history-
muslim-philosophy-volume-1-book-3/chapter-10-mutazalism#8-al%E2%80%91jubbai

Muhammad Kamal. Mu’tazilah: the rise of Islamic Rationalism. Australian Rationalist, 62(Autumn), 2003. http://hdl.handle.net/11343/34082

Nazeer Ahmed. “Wasil ibn Ata”, islamstory, May 30, 2016. https://islamstory.com/en/artical/22491/Wasil-ibn-Ata

P.S. Syed Masood Jamali, Khalid Wheed. Mu‘tazilah, The First Rationalist School of Thought in Islamic History: A Critical Study of Its
Ideology And Approach. Hamdard Islamicus, Vol. 43(4), 2021. https://doi.org/10.57144/hi.v43i4.63

T. Editors of Encyclopaedia. "Wāṣil ibn ʿAṭāʾ." Encyclopedia Britannica, January 1, 2023. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Wasil-ibn-Ata

“Washil bin Atha’: Sang Penggagas Ilmu Klam dari Kaum Mu’tazilah”, Madrasah Digital, December 7, 2021.
https://madrasahdigital.co/tadarus-tokoh/8990/

Zanimal. Mu’tazilah Dalam Lintasan Sejarah Pemikiran Islam, Tarikhuna: Journal of History and History Education, Vol. 3(1), 2021.

Zayyanu Altine, Adam Yusuf Adam. An Analysis of the Emergence, Development and Doctrines of the Mu’tazilites in The Light of Islamic
Perspectives. Bangladesh: South Asian Research Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, Vol. 1(1), 2019.
Thank
you

You might also like