Rkud 4142 (Group 4)
Rkud 4142 (Group 4)
Rkud 4142 (Group 4)
T a b l e o f Co n t e nt
04
03
REASON AND REVELATION: CONCLUSION
WĀṢIL’S IMPACT ON
MU‘TAZILITE THEOLOGY
INTRODUCTION
The first rationalist theological school in the history of
Islamic thought, emerged in the early centuries of Islam.
Originating in Basrah and later flourishing in Baghdad,
particularly during the caliphate of al-Ma’mun from 813 to
833 CE
Interpreted the dogmas of religion in the light of human
reason, which contradicted mainstream Muslim beliefs.
Reason as their primary source of knowledge, followed by
revelation, Quran and Sunnah.
Wāṣil ibn ʿAṭā, who is widely recognized and credited as
the founder of the Mu’tazila school
how he influenced the development of Mu’tazilah's
distinctive approach to reason and revelation.
Biographical &
Intellectual
background
BIOGRAPHY
Abu Hudhaifah Wāṣil Ibn ʿĀṭā’ Al-ghazzāl,
born around 700 (80 AH) in Medina, and
passed away in Basrah in 748 (131 AH)
A prominent Muslim theologian and jurist
He initially studied under Abu Hashim
`Abd Allah ibn Muhammad ibn
al‑Hanafiyyah, the grandson of Ali, which
provided him the foundation in various
Islamic teachings.
He later travel to Basra in Iraq to study
under Hasan of Basra (one of the Tabi‘in)
and engaged with other influential
religious figures who lived there.
He was unafraid to have a different opinion
from his own teacher, if according to him
the thought is not in accordance with his
vision.
This bold approach is particularly evident
in his view of the 'manzilah bayna
manzilatayn' issue.
In Basra he began to formulate the
ideologies that led to the Muʿtazilite school
These rational thought of his, stemmed
from conflicts and theological debates
intertwined with politics at that time.
His work include: Kitab al‑Manzilah baina
al‑Manzilatain, Kitab al‑Futya, Kitab fi al-
Tauhid wa al-‘Adl, and many more.
His experiences with the complexities of
theology and politics of his time provided
the foundation for Mu'tazilah’s focus on
reason and revelation.
Wāṣil’s exposure to the intellectually
stimulating environment in Basra were
crucial in shaping his rational thought
which later also shaped the foundational
principles of Mu'tazilah.
WĀṢIL’s FOUNDATIONAL
TEACHINGS
Before Wāṣil ibn ‘Āṭā’s stance, there were already three different opinions on the issue.
Khawarij believed that one who committed major sin was no longer a believer and hence
had to be treated as unbeliever. Murji’ah believe that the grave sinner is still believer in all
sense, because committing a major sin is nothing to do with his faith. Ahl al-sunnah believe
that the grave sinner is still believer but by committing such sin his faith would weaken until
he repents.
Wāṣil ibn ‘Āṭā had come up with a new moderate opinion which is one who commits a
grave sin is neither a believer nor an unbeliever but occupies an intermediate position as
fasiq. On this very account, that Wasil withdrew himself from Imam Hasan al‑Basri and
earned the title ’Mu'tazilah’.
This doctrine stipulated that grave sinners would be expelled from the circle of the believers
but would nevertheless not be counted among the disbelievers. Those who were in this state
in between would receive permanent punishment but lighter than that of disbelievers.
Analysis of Wāṣil's Thought on
"The Issue of Grave Sinner"
His belief is that the expression “true believer” is one which means praise. The person who
commits grave sins can never deserve such praise; therefore, he cannot be called a true
believer because faith requires obedience to God, not just confession and justification. Such
a person has, nevertheless, still believe in the Islamic faith and believe that God alone is
worthy of being worshipped; therefore, he also cannot be regarded as an absolute unbeliever
either.
Only, if he dies before repenting, he will be put in hell and remain in it forever, because in the
afterlife there are only two options, namely heaven and hell. Believers go to heaven and
unbelievers go to hell. But, a fasiq person is sent to hell, only the punishment is lighter than a
kafir. It seems that he wants to encourage people not to underestimate sinful acts, especially
major sins.
The issue of ‘Manzilah bayna manzilatayn’ was purely an intellectual discourse and not even
based on evidence from Qur’an or Sunnah and it becomes the first seed on the basis of
which all later principles of Mu‘tazilah had evolved.
Mu'tazilah's Stand on
Reason and Revelation
Mir Valiuddin. A History of Muslim Philosophy Volume 1, Book 3, Chapter 10: Mu’tazalism”, Al-Islam.org, n.d. https://www.al-islam.org/history-
muslim-philosophy-volume-1-book-3/chapter-10-mutazalism#8-al%E2%80%91jubbai
Muhammad Kamal. Mu’tazilah: the rise of Islamic Rationalism. Australian Rationalist, 62(Autumn), 2003. http://hdl.handle.net/11343/34082
Nazeer Ahmed. “Wasil ibn Ata”, islamstory, May 30, 2016. https://islamstory.com/en/artical/22491/Wasil-ibn-Ata
P.S. Syed Masood Jamali, Khalid Wheed. Mu‘tazilah, The First Rationalist School of Thought in Islamic History: A Critical Study of Its
Ideology And Approach. Hamdard Islamicus, Vol. 43(4), 2021. https://doi.org/10.57144/hi.v43i4.63
T. Editors of Encyclopaedia. "Wāṣil ibn ʿAṭāʾ." Encyclopedia Britannica, January 1, 2023. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Wasil-ibn-Ata
“Washil bin Atha’: Sang Penggagas Ilmu Klam dari Kaum Mu’tazilah”, Madrasah Digital, December 7, 2021.
https://madrasahdigital.co/tadarus-tokoh/8990/
Zanimal. Mu’tazilah Dalam Lintasan Sejarah Pemikiran Islam, Tarikhuna: Journal of History and History Education, Vol. 3(1), 2021.
Zayyanu Altine, Adam Yusuf Adam. An Analysis of the Emergence, Development and Doctrines of the Mu’tazilites in The Light of Islamic
Perspectives. Bangladesh: South Asian Research Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, Vol. 1(1), 2019.
Thank
you