WHY

DESIGN MAGAZINE APR 2023

A journal on green architecture, design ideas, discovery and innovation

US?..
E C O A R C H I T E C T U R E & E C O M A S T E R P L A N N I N G
our product:
design ideas & innovations
our promise:
innovation ingenuity
hypergreen sustainability
signature style
well-being happiness
cost control viability
Contact Us:
© T. R. Hamzah & Yeang Sdn. Bhd., 2023
8, Jalan 1, Taman Sri Ukay, 68000 Ampang, Selangor, Malaysia
[ t ] 03-4257 1966/ 1948 [ f ] 03-4256 1005 [ e ] [email protected] [ w ] www.trhamzahyeang.com
 WHY
what others say about us? DESIGN MAGAZINE
A journal on green architecture, design ideas, discovery and innovation
APR 2023

in “design = e2”, PBS documentary, Episode 6

US?..
.. wind, rain and sun in the minds of most
architects, they are enemies, but what if
buildings can utilise and respond to the
conditions of the environment? what if the
urban environment itself became a living,
breathing organism? To Ken Yeang it is..

view audio
E C O A R C H I T E C T U R E & E C O M A S T E R P L A N N I N G
our product:
design ideas & innovations
our promise:
innovation ingenuity
hypergreen sustainability
signature style
Brad Pitt says well-being happiness
cost control viability
Contact Us:
© T. R. Hamzah & Yeang Sdn. Bhd., 2023
8, Jalan 1, Taman Sri Ukay, 68000 Ampang, Selangor, Malaysia
2 © T. R. Hamzah & Yeang Sdn Bhd, 2023 [ t ] 03-4257 1966/ 1948 [ f ] 03-4256 1005 [ e ] [email protected] [ w ] www.trhamzahyeang.com
what others say about us? Archute about us
T. R. Hamzah & Yeang Sdn. Bhd.
..a champion of the green We are an experienced architecture, masterplanning and interior design company with
design movement, Yeang was
..Ken Yeang has developed a distinctive largely seen as a pioneer who demonstrated history of skills in designing and delivering signature award-winning super-
architectural vocabulary that extends was way ahead of his time.. green solutions in asia and internationally.
beyond questions of style..
Since 1976 over 5 decades of experience & dependability brought
to benefit the development
1971 research on Ecological Design (Cambridge University)
(1 November 2022)

Lord Norman Foster ..Ken Yeang is an architect and ecologist with

Principals: Tengku
(British Architect, Foster & Partners) a wealth of experience in ecological design Robert Ken Yeang
and planning for over 50 years. He has Hamzah (Dr. Dato’)
pioneered the field of biophilic design and
his ‘bioclimatic skyscraper’, is a type of high-
rise now used in various cities that performs
as a passive low-energy building, designed Experience: over 500 completed projects (since 1976)
(City & Country|12 December 2022) according to the location’s local climate..
..The firm’s ethos is * Design innovation
“innovation, hyper-green, * Specialist in ecological design (pioneered in 1971)
signature and people’s
happiness-focused design”, Differentiation: * Signature aesthetics
* Over 70 design awards
which are its signature * Design for high livability & well-being
aesthetics and what make
its work compelling..
excellence in everything we do
..probably no individual is more important in
Our values: we are committed to do and built everything
in the pursual of excellence.
the development of ecodesign’s theory and
practice than the London and Kuala Lumpur-
based architect Ken Yeang.. the preferred partner and professional in everyway
Our vision: we aim to become the preferred solution partner offering fully design
and built functional market driven, innovation, super-green, signature
(aesthetic fulfilling) architecture and masterplan.

..Ken, how many of these have you built?..

(at conference (UK) sponsored by Infosys) to be a quality design and built solution provider with customized
design solutions in the local and global market that we serve
Our mission: to achieve our vision of becoming the prefer architectural design and delivery
solution provider, we create values to our client through reliability completeness
..a few.. and efficiency. We also want our clients to experience worry-free services through
respect and trust.

..one of the 50 people who Malaysia: UK: China:

Ken Yeang
could save the Planet..
Offices: T. R. Hamzah & Yeang Sdn. Bhd.
8, Jalan 1, Taman Sri Ukay
68000 Ampang, Selangor, Malaysia
Ken Yeang Design International Ltd. North Hamzah Yeang Architectural
4A Avery Row, London, W1K 4AL Engineering Design Co. Ltd.
Guide International Centre B-10F,

King Charles III Nanbine Road 27 Beijing, 10055

see our website: https://trhamzahyeang.com/

4 © T. R. Hamzah & Yeang Sdn Bhd, 2023 © T. R. Hamzah & Yeang Sdn Bhd, 2023 5
Personal Awards our principal..
2005 •
2011 •
WACA (World Association of Chinese Architects) Gold Medal Award
Merdeka Award for the ‘Environment’ category
our chief executive officer
• PAM Gold Medal Award
2014 • Design Master of World Alliance of Sustainable Cities Design (WSC)

Ken Yeang
• MGBC Leadership in Sustainability Awards 2014 for Excellence and AA Dip. / A PAM / F SIA / RIBA / FRSA /
Leadership in Sustainability Hon. FAIA, D.Lit (hHon.) (Sheffield), PhD. (Cantab)
2015 • BCA-SGBC Green Building Individual Awards - Professor (Graham Willis Chair, Sheffield University)
Green Architect Lifetime Achievement Award Adjunct Professor (RMIT, Melbourne)
2016 • Liang Sicheng Architecture Prize, China Adjunct Professor (Univeristy of Hawaii)
• BUILD Award 2016: Sustainable Building Awards - Adjunct Professor (University of New South Wales, Sdyney)
Best Green Architect
• Identified as the 40th Most Famous Architects of the 21st Century
2022 • Australian Institute of Architect - Leadership in Sustainability Prize Ken Yeang is an architect and ecologist, known for
his signature hyper-green architecture, a field he
pioneered since 1971. His work is differentiated by
an ecology-based approach that performs beyond
conventional green-rating systems (LEED and
others). His work has a visually distinct verdant green
aesthetic that enhances the locality’s biodiversity
designed as constructed ecosystems.
The work has received numerous awards that
include the Aga Khan Award, Prince Claus Award
(Netherlands), LiangSiCheng International Award
(China), Merdeka Award (Government of Malaysia),
Malaysian Institute of Architects Gold Medal and
other. His work seeks to advance the principles
of ecological and bioclimatic architecture. He has
authored over 12 books on the topic.
Following training was at the AA School (Architectural
Association, London), he received a doctorate from
Ken Yeang received Cambridge University, on ecological design and
Aga Khan Award in 1996 planning. He is an Honorary Fellow of Wolfson
College. He is the Distinguished Plym Professor at
Illinois University. The British newspaper, Guardian
names him “one of the 50 people who could save
the Planet’.

Ken Yeang meets HH The Aga Khan

(second left) at the 1986 AgaA Khan
Award for Architecture Presentation
Ceremony in Marrakesh, Morocco

Architectural Society of China Liang Sicheng Award 2016 Receiving the Government of Malaysia
received from Minister of Construction, China Merdeka Award for the ‘Énvironment’
category (2011) from Prime Minister

6 © T. R. Hamzah & Yeang Sdn Bhd, 2023 © T. R. Hamzah & Yeang Sdn Bhd, 2023 7
 innovation ingenuity
hypergreen sustainability
signature style

what
well-being luxury
cost control viability

sign innovati
a en
ntrol rgre

on
co

ture
t
eing

e
hyp
cos

well-b

we do?
8 © T. R. Hamzah & Yeang Sdn Bhd, 2023 © T. R. Hamzah & Yeang Sdn Bhd, 2023 9
what delights users and public?
•verandahway
awards received by project
• Bronze Award -Regional Holcim Awards 2011
innovation / ingenuity:
Complement the ‘songket’ glass
canopy located at the covered
• Silver Award -Green Building Index (GBI) 2014
• Winner -Cityscape Global Awards 2018/2019
• Winner - Malaysia GBC Best New Green
by specialist expertise in low energy design
Commercial Building 2020
pedestrian arcade with retail United

what makes it innovative?

spaces at the bottom edges Nations
Sustainable
of each block give weather Development
protection to pedestrians. Goals

•glass sun-shading
•central promenade
Active public realm with seating zones, planting areas
as temporal event spaces and faces the retail and F&B
spaces, and semi-covered seating areas. The tower blocks
provide shadows sun-shading over the promenade for
most parts of the day. United
Nations
United Sustainable
Nations Development
Sustainable Goals
Development
Goals
The sunshade glazing also assist in establishing
comfortable micro-climates in habitable spaces along
Green Building Index fritted-glass the building’s exterior.
solar shading
(GBI)-Silver
•double-skin façade
•balconies with
planter boxes
Facade openings are have
protruding balconies with
landscape planters to be visible skycourt United
from beyond the vertical glass United Nations
Sustainable
sun-shading, and create random Nations
Development
Sustainable
patterns on the overall facade. Development Goals
Goals The building’s enter facades are faceted to present itself
as a crystalline diamond-like structure, by the use of
what makes the building sustainable? angled glass sun-shading that wraps around the building.
planter
•biodiversity matrix as box
•“eco cells”
basis of creating habitats
create habitats

United
Nations
Sustainable
Development The continues vegetation connects the green area from
select native fauna species to be brought back to
locality: for Feeding, Breeding, refugee from prey United Goals Level 1 retail garden down to Basement 2 level, and
Nations channels surface rainwater into a drain at Basement 2
Sustainable
Development then will be pumped up back to ground level.
Goals

establish interactions
between fauna and habitats •Natural daylighting
select non-invasive flora
species to attract fauna

promenade

PROJECT EXAMPLE Each block is centered by 8 storey high central Atrium.

A rooftop glass canopy provides natural daylight not
United only to the entrance reception area but also to the office
Suasana Putrajaya Nations
Sustainable
Development
spaces to provide maximum daylight penetration and
enables energy efficient lighting systems within the
Putrajaya Precinct 2, Malaysia Goals spaces with openable windows for natural ventilation.
*The photo shows the public enjoyment
10 © T. R. Hamzah & Yeang Sdn Bhd, 2023 of building during Independence Day* © T. R. Hamzah & Yeang Sdn Bhd, 2023 11
 BCA Green Mark Platinum innovation / ingenuity:
what makes it innovative?
Passive Mode: by Solar Protection
by vegetated skycourts
Passive Mode: by Landscaping & Vegetation
Requirements: • Innovative tropical building with advanced bioclimatic design

•sun-shading
• Healthy & energy saving building
Requirements: • Innovative tropical building with advanced bioclimatic design
Passive Mode: by Facade Design • Efficient building with integrated building system

what about the interiors?

• Healthy & energy saving building
Requirements:
• Efficient building with integrated building system • Innovative tropical building with advanced bioclimatic design • Cost effective
• Cost effective • Healthy & energy saving building
• Efficient building with integrated building system 161.0 m of glazing
• Cost effective
Landscaped area at Level Landscaped area at Level
184.0 m
of glazing 10 is approximately 9% of 6 is approximately 3% of
Shading to Solid 612.0 m
the total floor area the total floor area

•vegetated
of glazing
North-west
United
958.0 m 273.0 m
Shading to of glazing 820.0 m
of glazing of glazing
South-east

South-East façade (North Bridge Road

Elevation) - 27% of glazing to solid ratio
North-East façade (Middle Road Elevation) -
33% of glazing to solid ratio
Nations
Sustainable Level 9 : 85% Vegetation

skycourts
205.0 m
Shading to
North-east
62.0 m
of glazing
Solid wall of glazing
Development
Shading to
268.0 m
of glazing
1680.0 m
of glazing Goals Level 7 : 21% Vegetation

South-east Sun Path

North-West of(Victoria
façade SiteSt. Elevation) South_West façade (Bain St. Elevation)
- 6.5% of glazing to solid ratio - 34% of glazing to solid ratio

Passive Mode:blades
Sunshading by Wind
boldly& Natural Ventilation
define tropical aesthetics for
Level 1 : 35% Vegetation

the building besides providing

building solar shading and anti-glare
Landscaped area at Ground Level
Requirements: is approximately 35% of the site & SW - SE Section
•Healthy & energy saving
performance thattropical
•Innovative in totality
•State-of-the-Art
buildinggives the image of a contemporary
United
approximately 8% of the total floor
area
Over 6,300 m2 is designated
climatic-responsive
Passive Mode: by built Windform. & Natural Ventilation Nations a ‘green space’ that creates
Requirements: •Healthy & energy saving building
Sustainable
Development
urban “Skycourts” providing
•low energy design a positive psychological
•Innovative tropical building
•State-of-the-Art
Goals
effect on building users and
Site Wind Rose Diagram
improving general working
environments.
Site Wind Rose Diagram

•green material
SW - SE Section

SW - SE Section

Passive mode strategies

used are assembled United
together as collective Nations
strategy for low energy Sustainable
skycourt United
and high comfort building. Development
Goals Nations
Sustainable
Development
Goals

bio-integration of The use of recycled and reused materials generally ( such

as carpet, wall fabrics and sustainable-forested local timber)
4 ecology structures contribute to an environmentally low impact design.

what delights users and public?

•public Realm
United
Nations
Sustainable
Development
Goals
United
Nations At the heart of the scheme is the Public
Sustainable Events Plaza which is a communal
Development
Goals space that becomes main focal point of
the site and subsequently leading visitors
into main foyer and library proper.

unique features: awards received by project

• BCA Green Mark Platinum 2005
The National Library Board (NLB) building standing along • Silver Award - 3rd SIA Façade Design Excellence Awards 2006
Victoria Street in Singapore today was the outcome of a • Shortlisted in sustainability category -RICS Awards 2006
• First Prize - ASEAN Energy Efficiency Awards 2007
winning competition scheme that underwent several design • Silver Award -BCA’s Universal Design Awards 2007
revisions before it was accepted by the Client. • BCA Green Mark Platinum 2009

The Client wanted a cultural and tropical building to which

the Architect responded with an open-to-the-sky naturally-
ventilated civic plaza on the ground plane with opportunities
PROJECT EXAMPLE
for cultural activities and various ‘outdoor’ events. A rooftop
‘bubble’ designed to face the waterfront nearby was also NATIONAL LIBRARY
popular with people for holding various functions. VICTORIA ST, SINGAPORE

12 © T. R. Hamzah & Yeang Sdn Bhd, 2023 © T. R. Hamzah & Yeang Sdn Bhd, 2023 13
what makes it innovative?
•the “flue wall”
innovation / ingenuity:
Naturally ventilates the lower 3 floors during the mid-seasons
by specialist expertise in low energy
(Spring & Autumn) and reduces annual energy consumption.
BREEAM (mixed mode) hospital design
“Excellent”
rated

upper valve

United
Nations
Sustainable
Development
Goals

•featured building
Great Ormond Street Hospital is featured in a poster at the
London Underground Station. United
Nations
Sustainable
Development
Goals

Great Ormond thermal

Street Hospital cooling flue

lower valve:
mixed mode floors
(3 floors)

unique features:
The Great Ormond Street Hospital is located in London, the
building is the first “Excellent” BRE-rated hospital in the UK. A key
feature of the hospital extension is the flue wall which is an energy
efficient fabric and ventilation system expressed on the façade
facing Guilford Street. The design solution establishes a sense
PROJECT EXAMPLE
of order, ease of use, comfort and inspiration to the campus,
providing facilities befitting Great Ormond Street’s status as the great ormond street hospital
world’s leading tertiary children hospital. London, uk

14 © T. R. Hamzah & Yeang Sdn Bhd, 2023 © T. R. Hamzah & Yeang Sdn Bhd, 2023 15
what makes it innovative?
•experimental diagonal
hypergreen / sustainability:
ecological nexus with continuous vegetated ramp
light shaft Innovating environmental device is the
“Solar Shaft” that cuts through the upper
floors of Tower A to allow daylight to
penetrate into the deep interior spaces.
BCA GreenMark
uppermost
roof garden what delights users and public?
United
Nations
Platinum
mid roof •roof gardens
Sustainable
Development
garden
Goals

GREEN PROJECTION

Roof Garden United

Continuous Vertical NIVEL XIV
Nations Sky terraces at the corner of the
Landscaping (1.5 km Sustainable
Urban Ecosystem) building that forms interesting
NIVEL XIII

NIVEL XII
Development
Naturally-Ventilated
Day-Lit Atrium
NIVEL XI

Goals green landscapes and contributes

unique social meeting points
NIVEL X

Solar Shaft & Internal

NIVEL IX

Planted Terraces connected to nature.

NIVEL VIII

NIVEL VII

Climate-Responsive NIVEL VI

Solar-Shaded Facade NIVEL V

•“vertical linear park”

NIVEL IV
SOLARIS FUSIONOPOLIS

NIVEL III

Sky Terraces NIVEL II

NIVEL I

Verandahway
(Semi Enclosed
Tropical Walkway)
Singapour

Ecocell & Rainwater

Harvesting

•“eco cells”
The “eco cell” is a device that allows for
United
Nations
vegetation, daylight, natural ventilation Sustainable
Development
and rainwater harvesting to extend into Goals
the car-park levels below. The 1.5 km long continuous
green ramp acts as an
ecological armature. With
United each building corner, the spiral
Nations ramp expands into generous
Sustainable
Development
double-volume sky terraces.
Goals
Vertical integration
of vegetation
Rainwater
harvesting
Natural
ventilation
Daylight
penetration
An opportunity to provide
a “living machine”/
constructed wetland
spiral ramp as
“Vertical Linear Park”
•operable louvers
over Atrium
provision of This innovative device allows
ecosystem wind to cross-ventilate
the atrium while keeping
services United
Nations
Sustainable
out the rain. This device is
composed as a series of
glazing panels, separated by
Development
Goals perforated panels.

awards received by project

United
Nations • First Prize - Skyrise Greenery Awards 2009
Sustainable • Platinum Rating - BCA GreenMark 2009
Development • Green GOOD DESIGN Award 2010
Goals • Gold Medal - WACA Award 2011
• Gold Award -PAM Awards 2011
• Finalist - RAIA International Architecture 2012
• NPark Leaf Certificate Awards 2014

unique features: • AIA IR Design Awards 2014, Hong Kong

• FuturARC Green Leadership Award 2015
• FIABCI World Prix d’ Excellence Awards 2016
The main ecological sustainable significance of the project is its
1.5 km long continuous perimeter landscaped ramp from the
basement to roof garden, which demonstrating ecological nexus
and connectivity. Furthermore, the vegetation has compensates PROJECT EXAMPLE
“Eco Cells”
cleared vegetation for construction on-site, which exceeding site
footprint by 80%. These is how Solaris strives to enhance its SOLARIS
site’s existing ecosystems. ONE-NORTH, SINGAPORE

16 © T. R. Hamzah & Yeang Sdn Bhd, 2023 © T. R. Hamzah & Yeang Sdn Bhd, 2023 17
what makes it innovative? hypergreen / sustainability:
•continuous vertical by continuous green wall
green wall
The façades of the Data Centre
incorporate extensive vertical
green walls that act as living what delights users and public?
habitats. The large greenery
components act as means of
filtering and improving the building’s
United
Nations •spacious internal
spaces & daylighting
Sustainable
ambient indoor air quality. Development
Goals
The main office and circulation spaces are
glazed using full-height Low-E curtain walls
to provide maximum daylight penetration
United and enables energy efficient lighting
Nations systems within the spaces. Secondary
Sustainable rooms are also fitted with operable windows
Development
Goals for natural ventilation and daylight.
•solar shading
The building is clad with white aluminium panels,
clear glass windows, and spandrels with horizontal Green Building Index
blades that provides solar shading and anti-glare
performance that gives the image of a contemporary (GBI)-Gold
climatic reponsive built form.
United
Nations
photovoltaic
Sustainable roof canopy
Development
Goals continuous green wall
for ecological nexus

•renewable energy
An array of photovoltaic
panels is installed on the
building’s uppermost roof area.
The 234 m2 PV array generates
approximately 35.28KWh of
electricity on site with all power
generated feeding directly back
into the municipal power grid.

United
naturally ventilated
Nations elevated lobby
Sustainable
Development
Goals

unique features:
The DIGI Technology Operation Centre located in
Malaysia’s Subang High Tech Park was completed
in 2010 and has since been awarded a GBI Gold
rating. The Client’s brief was to design a data
centre with ecological features and is based on the
‘IT Data Centre’s Uptime Institute’ Tier III platform
with the possibility of scaling up to Tier IV security.
A key feature of the DIGI Centre is a vegetated green
PROJECT EXAMPLE
wall that wraps around its four facades - meant to
act as living habitats and as means of filtering and
DIGI DATA CENTRE
improving its ambient indoor air quality. SUBANG JAYA, MALAYSIA

18 © T. R. Hamzah & Yeang Sdn Bhd, 2023 © T. R. Hamzah & Yeang Sdn Bhd, 2023 19
 signature / style:
Award Winning Architecture

future
photovoltaic
rooftop solar receptacle
plaza

garden
terrace
triple-storey
skycourt

aluminium fins
and louvers
for sunshading

three-storey
planted mound triple-volume
entrance lobby

Aga Khan Award for

Architecture 1996

signature features:
Menara Mesiniaga is one of our early buildings that launched our
work in ecological design as low-energy (bioclimatic) architecture PROJECT EXAMPLE
and which received the Aga Khan Award. The year was 1992,
and the building marked the beginning, both literally as well as menara mesiniaga
figuratively, a new era in our work on deep green design. subang, malaysia

20 © T. R. Hamzah & Yeang Sdn Bhd, 2023 © T. R. Hamzah & Yeang Sdn Bhd, 2023 21
 signature / style:
homogeneous canopy roof design

homogeneous
canopy roof

PROJECT EXAMPLE
Xiong’an station
beijing, china

22 © T. R. Hamzah & Yeang Sdn Bhd, 2023 © T. R. Hamzah & Yeang Sdn Bhd, 2023 23
 well-being / luxury:
happiness hormones retail without air-conditioning (mixed-mode cooling)
✓ dopamine
✓ serotonin what makes it innovative?
✓ oxytocin •extractor fan
endorphins
United
Nations
Sustainable
bringing natural Development
Goals
day light into the
retail space

natural
ventilated
cool plaza extractor
fan

PROJECT EXAMPLE
ttdi plaza
kuala lumpur, malaysia

24 © T. R. Hamzah & Yeang Sdn Bhd, 2023 © T. R. Hamzah & Yeang Sdn Bhd, 2023 25
 well-being / luxury:
beyond user satisfaction
owner’s comment:
.. we are living in paradise!..
- Mr. R -

entrance

living
area

pleasure
pool

promonade to
sleeping area

PROJECT EXAMPLE
R House
Johor Bahru, Malaysia

26 © T. R. Hamzah & Yeang Sdn Bhd, 2023 © T. R. Hamzah & Yeang Sdn Bhd, 2023 27
 cost control / viability: cost control / viability:
through value engineering at every stage.. by assessing commercial viability as basis for design
Proposed Development at LRT3 SIRIM Station, Shah Alam
Revision 1: 8‐May‐15

for UEM Sunrise Berhad

example of assistance in financial modelling DRAFT
1 Basis for Development
Land Area
a. Mixed Development 643,381 ft2 59,772 m2 14.77 ac

Plinth Area 770,576 ft2 71,615 m2 17.69 ac

Zoning Commercial

Proposed Plot Ratio (Subject to Approval) 1 : 3.0 1,930,144 sqf

Proposed GFA
Retail 20% of Total GFA 386,029 ft2
Office 30% of Total GFA 579,043 ft2
Residential 50% of Total GFA 965,072 ft2
Total 100% 1,930,144 ft2

2 Proposed Development ‐ Mixed‐Development

GFA GFA Overall Efficiency Typical Floor Efficiency NFA NFA
ft2 m2 % % ft2 m2
Retail 386,029 35,876 70% 73% 270,220 25,113
Office 579,043 53,814 78% 82% 451,654 41,975
Residential 965,072 89,691 80% 82% 772,057 71,753

Total Area 1,930,144 179,381 1,493,931 138,841

Car Park Requirement for Retail

Car Park Areas for Retail (GFA X 70% / 500sqf) 540 spaces

by value engineering
Total Car Park Areas Required *assume 350ft2/CPS 189,154 ft2 540 spaces

Car Park Requirement for Office

Car Park Areas for Office (NFA / 500sqf) 811 spaces
Total Car Park Areas Required *assume 350ft2/CPS 283,731 ft2 811 spaces

Car Park Requirement for Residential

Car Park Areas for Residential (65% X GFA / 500sqf) 965 Units 1,062 spaces
Total Car Park Areas Required *assume 350ft2/CPS 371,553 ft2 1,062 spaces

Total Car Parking Provided

Car Park Areas for Retail 189,154 ft2 540 spaces
Car Park Areas for Office 283,731 ft2 811 spaces
2
Car Park Areas for Residential 371,553 ft 1,062 spaces
Total Car Parking Provided = 844,438 ft2 2,413 spaces
Car Park @ 6 Storeys Podium

4 Construction Cost
2
Construction Cost for Mixed Development RM/ ft Area RM
Apartments (Medium‐High End) 310 965,072 299,172,258
Office 320 579,043 185,293,786
Retail 170 386,029 65,624,882
Car Park Podium 100 844,438 84,443,783
Amenities 150 119,600 17,940,000
Sub‐total 2,894,181 652,474,709

External Works + Infra *assume RM1,000,000 / acre 14,770,000 key decision

The cyclic process of design and cost check, with value Sub‐total 667,244,709
factors:
engineering to bring any overrun back to the budget. Preliminaries
Contingencies
7%
5%
46,707,130
35,697,592
Estimated Total Construction Cost 324 psf 2,315,138 749,649,430 construction cost
5 Development Cost RM
Total Construction Cost for Mixed Development = T. C. C. + 25% Soft Cost 937,061,787
Soft Cost: Dev. charges, consultants, marketing, legal & agency fees, site supervision, financing charges, etc. (Approx. 25%)
Development Cost (excluding land cost) 937,061,787

Total Development Cost RM 937,061,787 development cost

6 Financial Viability
Estimated Income Selling RM/ ft2 NFA RM
Assume Retail Selling Price (TBC) 1,200 270,220 324,264,125
Assume Office Selling Price (TBC) 1,200 451,654 541,984,323
Assume Residential Selling Price (TBC) 1,000 772,057 772,057,440 sales price
Assume 20% of CPS to be sold @ RM40,000/bay 40,000 483 bays 19,301,436
Total GDV 1,657,607,324
GDV
Residue = GDV ‐ Dev. Cost == 720,545,536
= (Excluding land cost) 43.47%

We control money, process, greenness, information, human resources If Profit @ 25% of GDV
Land Value
=
= 476 psf
profit 414,401,831
306,143,705

If required, we can help advise on your financial model for your projects. 18.47% land value/
as residue
28 © T. R. Hamzah & Yeang Sdn Bhd, 2023 © T. R. Hamzah & Yeang Sdn Bhd, 2023 29
 you get hypergreen projects
ecological-driven
landscaping

hypergreen unique & iconic

facade design

roof garden
continuous
ecological nexus

vertical
landscaping

ecobridge

DALU Teoli Mixed-development (China)

Sepang Waterfront (Malaysia) EDITT Tower (Singapore) SOMA Masterplan (India)

continuous vertical
green wall

Fritted-glass
canopy
vegetated ramp

Ganendra Art House (Malaysia)

Innovation
UM Masterplan (Malaysia) Plaza VADZ (Malaysia)
well-being &
landmark
happiness

signature

Millenium Monument (Malaysia) DUBAI Masterplan (Dubai)

30 © T. R. Hamzah & Yeang Sdn Bhd, 2023 © T. R. Hamzah & Yeang Sdn Bhd, 2023 31
 we exist to fix the earth

AVE THE PLA

S N

TO

ET
why
we do it?
BY
D E SI G N
& enable investor, developer & end user to
achieve aspiration to save the environment
32 © T. R. Hamzah & Yeang Sdn Bhd, 2023 © T. R. Hamzah & Yeang Sdn Bhd, 2023 33
 by research to advance field
of sustainable design..
our latest book on green design:

how
we do it?
Yeang, K., (2020), Saving The Planet By Design: Reinventing Our Cities Through Ecomimicry.

Introduction:
Routledge & Kegan (Taylor and Francis) (UK)

Can we ‘save the planet’ for a resilient, durable and sustainable future for human society? We need to repurpose, reinvent, redesign and remake our human-
made world so that our built environment is benignly and seamlessly biointegrated with Nature to function synergistically with it. These are the multiple tasks
that humanity must carry out imminently, if there is to be a future for human society and for all lifeforms and their environments on the Planet. Addressing this
is the most compelling question for not just those whose daily work impacts on Nature such as architects, engineers, landscape architects, town planners,
environmental policy makers, builders and others, but it is a question that all of humanity needs to urgently address.

Presented here are two key principles as the means to carry out these tasks – ‘ecocentricity’ being guided by the science of ecology, and ‘ecomimesis’ as
designing and making the built environment including all artefacts based on the emulation and replication of the ‘ecosystem’ concept and its attributes.

Designing with ecology is contended here as the authentic approach to green design from which the next generation of sustainable design will emerge, going
beyond current use of accreditation systems.

For those who subscribe to this principle, this is articulated here showing how it can be implemented by design. The adopting of these principles is fundamental
in our endeavour to save our Planet Earth, and changes profoundly and in entirety the way we design, make, manage and operate our built environment.

34 © T. R. Hamzah & Yeang Sdn Bhd, 2023 © T. R. Hamzah & Yeang Sdn Bhd, 2023 35
 ..over 14Dr.research-based books framework for ecological design
authored by Ken Yeang..
2011 • Ecological design as the biointegration of 5 sets of ecoinfrastructures to
create constructed ecosystems.
EcoArchitecture:
EcoArchitecture: the work of Ken Yeang

EcoArchitecture:
By Sara Hart
Edited by David Littlefield

Ken Yeang is internationally recognised as the leading proponent of ecological design in architecture. In 2008, he was tipped by The Guardian
as one of the ‘50 people who could save the planet’. He has built over 200 buildings globally and published numerous books advocating an
environmentally responsive approach to design. He is probably best known as the inventor of the green skyscraper; it was his innovative idea to
the work of

Ken Yeang
incorporate bioclimatic features in a high-density building type. It is for this and his ecological urban design that he has gained a uniquely influential

General System Model

position within architecture. Though he has authored many books about his work and his ideas, this is the first definitive book to cover his forty-year
career.

Featuring 23 of Yeang’s most significant projects, EcoArchitecture begins with his earliest work on environmental design, executed as a student
at the Architectural Association and then a PhD student at Cambridge in the early 1970s, and with his most recent projects with Llewelyn Davies
Yeang in London and T.R. Hamzah & Yeang in Kuala Lumpur. A preface by Lord Foster and an introductory essay by Professor John Frazer provide

The key design factors are the following:-

the full context of Yeang’s thinking. The main text by contributing editor of Architectural Record, Sara Hart, and lecturer and freelance author, David
Littlefield, provides some critical reflection on the development of his work.

Sara Hart received a Master of Architecture degree from Columbia University in New York City. After many years in practice in New York, she
turned to design journalism, specialising in building technology and innovation. She has written extensively about new materials, technologies and
sustainable practices. She is a New York-based writer and contributing editor at Architectural Record.

Sara Hart

the work of
David Littlefield is a senior lecturer at the University of the West of England. He has written and edited a number of books, including: Architectural
Voices: Listening to Old Buildings (2007) and Liverpool One: Remaking a City Centre (2009), which are both published by John Wiley & Sons.

human society

Ken Yeang
•social •ecologically responsible behavior NWS
•economic •ecological responsible diet (Net Well-being

1995 2016 •political

•institutional
•human health, well-being &
happiness
& Happy Society)
Ecological design as the seamless
Yeang, K. (1995), Designing with Nature, Yeang, K., Kassim, Shiireen, Rosly Hamaeda,(2016), •culture

Sara Hart
McGraw-Hill, USA Constructed Ecosystem, ORO Editions, USA.
biointegration of our built environment with
nature, hydrology, energy and human society

Yeang, K. (2011), EcoArchitecture: the work of

Ken Yeang, John Wiley & Sons hydrology d e si
gn
•water management •waterways NZW on
by bi o
int
a ti human
•water conservation •seas (Net Zero Water)
ology

eg
•water reuse & recycling •snow r

r
eg

ra t
•ground water •dew

i nt

so
io n
hyd
bi o
•rainfall •lakes

ciety
by
d es
ig n
nature
•biosphere •habitats NPEI nature
17.7 mm

2009
216 x 276 mm
•biogeochemical cycles
•abiotic constituents
•species
•biodiversity
(Net Positive
Ecological Impact)

c os y s t em
Yeang, K. (2009), Ecomasterplanning, John Wiley & Sons, UK. •biotic constituents •biomes
an inspiring collection of the latest work of Ken Yeang that further advances •ecosystems
THREIPLAND

e ne r g y
AT ONE
and design. This collection features recent projects as he explores how we can
Yeang, K. (2017) It’s Not Easy Being
YEANG

n the natural and our built environments to create a better planet by design.
d highlights not only the systems and devices adopted, but also outlines the

ig n
Green, (Archicomic), ORO Editions, USA.
considerations demonstrating best practices for how we can proceed moving
odels our living Earth and shows how we can behave as stewards of our planet.

2017 2010

es

bi o
Cassia Patel, Oceanic Global Foundation

yd

de
wcases Ken Yeang’s latest ideas, built projects designs, research work and

nte i
ys
designing with nature, a topic that Yeang has pioneered and developed over

b
energy systems e

WITH
doctorate on ecological design and planning at Cambridge University. His ideas

co ns t r uc t
Yeang, K. (March 2010), Dictionary of Ecodesign

n
pertinent today with the current state of devastation of Earth’s natural systems,

t em

g
s
ti o
AT ONE WITH NATURE

rat
ycle that had been extensively and severely impacted by human society. The
is in a state of crisis, but what can society do to address the issues?
(with Lilian Woo), Taylor and Francis (UK).
NZE/C

ra
on

i
•renewable •battery
are presented with instructive diagrams that provide a basis for action for
igners, engineers, and for all those whose daily work impinges on the natural eg by

2000
a highly visual, annotated format, and serving as instructive illustrations to nt
•ambient •hydrogen i oi
s on the topic, students, and academics interested in designing with nature will
de
nformative and relevant. (Net Zero Energy / Carbon) b s ig
•electronic systems •passive mode systems
n

NATURE
Ken Yeang is an architect and ecologist best known for his ecology-based
ignature architecture, with its distinctive verdant green aesthetic and perfor-
mance beyond green rating systems. Driven by a pioneering spirit, Yeang’s long
nvolvement with sustainable design began in 1971 with his research work on •advance biofuels •mixed-mode systems
•geothermal energy •smart full mode systems
ecological design. Since then he has developed ideas, principles and systems
n ecological and bioclimatic architecture and master planning, contributing
ignificant advances in this field evident in his design, research, built work

•thermal storage •productive mode systems

and writings. He trained at the AA (Architectural Association School, UK) and
eceived his doctorate from Cambridge University (UK) on ecological design and
planning. His key buildings include Suasana Putrajaya (Malaysia), Solaris (Singa-
pore), Menara Mesiniaga (Malaysia, a recipient of an Aga Khan Award), Genome
Research Building (Hong Kong), and Great Ormond Street Children’s Hospital
Extension (UK). He received the Malaysian Institute of Architects Gold Medal,

ADVANCES IN ECOLOGICAL
he Government of Malaysia’s Merdeka Award, and the Architectural Society of
China Liang Sicheng Award 2016. He has authored over 12 books on ecological
design. The UK Guardian newspaper named him as one of 50 individuals who
could save the planet.

ARCHITECTURE IN THE WORK OF

constructed ecosystems
KEN YEANG
Edwina Threipland has considerable experience in zero-carbon buildings and
igh-specification housing schemes, having worked at ZEDFactory, KSR and
Giles + Pike Architects. She now works for both individual private clients and as

NZW/E
art of larger architectural practices in London, largely focusing on residential
rchitecture. She also enjoys writing on architectural matters and ecological
ssues for a variety of magazines, and previously created the front cover of The
Dictionary of Ecodesign by Ken Yeang and Lilian Woo. •technological systems •low embodied energy
•built environment systems •large scale electricity (Net Zero Waste / Emissions)
•artefacts storage
EDWINA T HREIPLAND •recycling
•reuse
•zero carbon steel
•zero carbon cement
Yeang, K. (2000) The Green Skyscraper: The •carbon capture •zero carbon fertilizer

Yeang, K., (2021), At One With Nature: Advances in

2021 Basis for Designing Sustainable Intensive
Buildings, Prestel, Munich, Germany
•hydrogen production
without emitting carbon
•zero carbon plastic
•smart systems
Ecological Architecture in the Work of Ken Yeang.
Edwina Threipland, (John Wiley & Sons) (US).
36 © T. R. Hamzah & Yeang Sdn Bhd, 2023 © T. R. Hamzah & Yeang Sdn Bhd, 2023 37
 by matrix of biodiversity target by progressive energy reduction
• Example of Biodiversity Targets Matrix for design of designing for Net Zero Energy/decarbonisation(NZE/CD)
habitats within development to enhance local biodiversity • Design stage modes to achieve Net Zero Energy (near) Design (NZED)
1 Baseline energy level
Design Process ( 1 to 6 )
maximise passive mode strategies:
• by built form orientation
• by built form configuration
• by facade & enclosural design mixed-mode strategies:
• by optimising ambient energies • by building orientation
• by natural ventilation • by building configuration
• etc. • by operable facade / enclosural systems

Energy Level
(micro- climate consideration) • by optimising comfort conditions with partial
M&E systems
create habitats • by natural ventilation (eg. during mid-seasons) full mode strategies:
• by use of fans & extractors • by smart systems
• by address seasonal variations • by high efficiency M&E systems
• by ground source heat pump • by low embodied energy

productive mode strategies:

• wind energy
• solar energy
• geothermal energy

2 Passive Mode 3 (partial

Mixed Mode 4 (fullFull Mode 5 (renewable
Productive Mode
select native fauna species to be brought back to locality: (bioclimatic design) M&E systems) M&E systems) energy systems)
6
for feeding, breeding, refugee from prey (based on baseline
ecological survey of site and surrounding) minimise carbon footprint minimise carbon footprint of minimise carbon footprint of minimise carbon footprint of Net Zero (Near)
of operation energy of operation energy of built systems & operation energy of built systems & operation energy of built systems & minimise carbon footprint of
built systems operational energy consumption operational energy consumption operational energy consumption operation energy of built systems &
(assess Energy Efficiency Index (Energy Efficiency Index (kWh/sqm/year)) (Energy Efficiency Index (kWh/sqm/year)) (Energy Efficiency Index (kWh/sqm/year)) operational energy consumption
(kWh/sqm/year)) following passive-mode design following mixed-mode design following full mode design (Energy Efficiency Index (kWh/sqm/year))
*embodied energy assessment *embodied energy assessment by others *embodied energy assessment by others *embodied energy assessment by others following productive mode design
by others *embodied energy assessment by others

• Thermal comfort conditions in relation to design mode

select non-invasive flora
species to attract fauna productive mode
(renewable energy systems)
full mode
(non-renewable energy systems)
establish interactions between mixed mode
flora, fauna and habitats (partial M&E systems)
passive mode
(no M&E systems)
external environment
(thermal conditions)

mid-season mid-season mid-season

create landscape conditions for
habitats to survive at all season autumn winter spring summer autumn
season: tempered & cold climate
38 © T. R. Hamzah & Yeang Sdn Bhd, 2023 © T. R. Hamzah & Yeang Sdn Bhd, 2023 39
(case-study: Solaris, Singapore)
Green Mark Platinum
energy reduction & cost saving
“..the daylight central atrium..” by effecting energy, water and cost savings..
(case-study: Suasana Putrajaya, Malaysia)
Green Building Index Silver rating “..the fritted glass double skin facade..”

reduction of energy consumption

Purpose Provided Req/ baseline Unit
Reduction of energy consumption:
1. Façade of the building, roof & skylights; 1. To reduce heat gain OTTV= 29.11 <50.00 W/m²
2. Motion sensor in the fire staircase & (Overall Thermal Transfer Value)
toilets; 2. To reduce energy consumption RTTV= 20.88 <25.00 W/m²
3. Lighting zoning & photocell sensor in (Roof Thermal Transfer Value)

annual energy savings the office area.;

4. LED & T5 light fitting in the office,
3. To reduce energy consumption
(Lighting Energy Intensity)
LEI= 30.21 38.55 kWh/yr/m²

Items Reference(MWh/year) Proposed (MWh/year) Energy saving common areas & façade lighting. 4. To reduce energy consumption
5. ACMV: thermal setting & efficiency 5. Thermal setting >24°C & comfortable Relative A/Cei= 58.57 92.57 kWh/yr/m²
AHU and FCU Fans 2,861,45 1,313.58 54.09% 6. Plug load (energy consumption) Humidity level of 55%.
Split Cooling Unit 5.14 3.96 23.01% 7. Building Energy Intensity (BEI) Efficiency: combination of AHU fan & motor power
8. BCS (Building Control System) can generate 60% efficiency
Mechanical Fans 699.87 239.41 65.79% installation in the Control Room; 6. To measure the energy efficiency of a building. BEI= 136.00 <150.0 kWh/yr/m²
Chilled Water Pumps 239.5 98.95 58.68% 7. To encourage enhancement of building EE
performance & reducing CO2 emission
Domestic Pump 43.54 43.54 0.00% 8. To monitor energy consumption
Exterior Lighting 191.39 65.21 65.93%
“..ecocell..”
Office Receptacle 1,845.84 1,845.84 0.00%
Retail Receptacle 41.01 41.01 0.00%
Water Heater 17.33 17.32 0.00%
Lifts 647.62 582.86 10.00%
Lighting 2,348.98 1,410.84 39.92%
Total Energy Consumption 8,940.98 5,662.52 36.67%
Reference (Tons) Proposed (Tons)
Cooling load Reduction 1,998.55 1,667.65 16.56%

annual water savings

Items Reference(m3) Proposed (m3) Saving (m3)
Water efficient fittings 54,752 42,970 111,782
Rainwater collection 0 -3,105 3,105
AHU Condensate 0 -904 904
Total 54,752 38,961 15,791
reduction of water consumption
Purpose Provided Req/ baseline Unit
estimated annual savings Reduction of water consumption:
1. Water efficient fitting with minimum 1. To minimize water flow rate for toilet fittings 32,900 55,477 m³/yr
= SGD 655,692 (energy) water flow rate 2. To harvest rainwater for landscape irrigation 11,055 - m³/yr
2. RWHT system for landscape irrigation 3. To harvest clean water for landscape irrigation 6,000 - m³/yr
+ SGD 36,335 (water) 3. Installation of ‘Condensate Water 4. To reduce potable water consumption by using: 30,879 - m³/yr (demand)
SGD 692,047 / USD 530,000 recovery’
4. Landscape irrigation system
Auto-control dripping system instead of sprinkler system
Rain water & condensate water recovery
55.00% >50.00 %reduction

“..the vertical linear park..”

40 © T. R. Hamzah & Yeang Sdn Bhd, 2023 © T. R. Hamzah & Yeang Sdn Bhd, 2023 41
 designing to conserve the site’s ecology designing to optimise builtform
• Example of Basis for Design (Option 1)
options
using the ecological land-use method Site A: Basis for Design For Development Order
example of basis for design
Plot Ratio
Topography Slope Analysis Natural Drainage 1:8 Proposed
Proposed M
Proposed Mixed-use
Mixed-use D
Mixed-use Development
m on
Development
Development on Lot
on Lot 55547
Lot 55547 (SiteA),
A Jalan
55547 (SiteA),
(SiteA), Jalan
Jalan D
Damansara,
m
Damansara,
Damansara, PJ
PJ for
for ARC
PJ for ARC
ARCR
ARC Resources
Resources
Resources

Draft Massing Project Information

O
Option
Option 222 (PR
Option (PR
R 1:8)
(PR 1:8)
1:8)
Proposed
Proposed
Date:
Date:
16 JuneMixed-use
Date:16
16June
Mixed-use
2022
June2022
2022
Development
Development on
on Lot
Lot 55547
55547 (SiteA),
(SiteA), Jalan
Jalan Damansara,
Damansara, PJ
PJ for
for ARC
ARC Resources
Resources
Option
Option 22 (PR
(PR 1:8)
1:8)
1. Site16
Date: Information
1.Date:
Site16
1.Site June
June2022
2022
Information
Information
(acres) (sq.ft) (sq.m)
(acres)
(acres) (sq.ft)
(sq.ft) (sq.m)
(sq.m)
Land
1.1.Site
Site Area
Information
Information 5.450 237,613 22,083
Land
Land Area
Area 5.450
5.450 237,613
237,613 22,083
22,083
Land surrendered for road widening (acres)0
(acres) 0
(sq.ft)
(sq.ft) (sq.m)0
(sq.m)
Land
Landsurrendered
surrenderedforforroad
roadwidening
widening 00 00 00
Nett Land
Land
Land Area Area
AreaArea 5.450
5.450 237,613
237,613 22,083
22,083
Nett
Nett Land
Land Area 5.450
5.450 237,613
237,613 22,083
22,083

Residential
Residential Tower
Tower Land
Landsurrendered
surrenderedforforroad
roadwidening
widening 00 00 00
Total plinth area 50% 118,807 11,042
Office
Office Tower
Tower
Nett
NettLand
Total
Total Land Area
plinth
plinthArea
area
area 5.450
5.450
50%
50% 237,613
237,613
118,807
118,807 22,083
22,083
11,042
11,042
(Block
(Block A&B:64
A&B:64 Basement plinth area (assumed)
Basement
Basementplinth
plintharea
area(assumed)
(assumed)
80%
80%
80%
190,090
190,090
190,090
17,666
17,666
17,666
(Block
(Block DD :: Proposed
Total
Totalplinth
plinthPlot
areaRatio
area 50%
50% 118,807
118,807 (Zoning Commercial)
8.0 (Zoning 11,042
11,042
8.0 (ZoningCommercial)
Commercial)
floors)
floors)
Proposed
Proposed Plot
Plot Ratio
Ratio 8.0
Max.
Basementpermissible
Basement plinth GFA
plintharea
area(assumed)
(assumed) 80%
80% 1,900,905
190,090 sq.ft
190,090 sq.ft 17,666
17,666
25
25 floors)
floors)
Max.
Max. permissible
permissible GFA
GFA 1,900,905
1,900,905 sq.ft

A (10
(10 units
units // floor)
floor) Proposed
ProposedPlot PlotRatio
Ratio 8.0 (Zoning
8.0 (ZoningCommercial)
Commercial)
2. Proposed
Max. Development
Max.permissible
permissible GFA
GFA 1,900,905
1,900,905 sq.ft sq.ft
2.2.Proposed
Proposed Development
Development

B
% of GFA Total GFA (fs) NFA(fs) Units
%%of ofGFAGFA Total TotalGFA GFA(fs) (fs) NFA(fs)
NFA(fs) Units
Units
ServicedDevelopment
2.2.Proposed
Proposed Apartments
Development 78.0% 1,482,706 1,151,160 1,272
Serviced
ServicedApartments Apartments 78.0%
78.0% 1,482,706
1,482,706 1,151,160 1,151,160 1,272
1,272
Office %%of of20.5%
GFA
GFA Total TotalGFA 389,685
GFA (fs)
(fs) 303,955
NFA(fs)
NFA(fs) Units
Units
Office
Office 20.5%
20.5% 389,685
389,685 303,955
303,955
Retail Apartments
Serviced
Serviced Apartments 1.5%
78.0%
78.0% 28,514 1,151,160
1,482,706
1,482,706 18,534
1,151,160 1,272
1,272
Retail
Retail 1.5%
1.5% 28,514
28,514 18,534
18,534
Total
Office
Office 100.0%
20.5%
20.5% 1,900,905
389,685
389,685 1,473,648 1,473,648
303,955
303,955 1,272
Total
Total 100.0%
100.0% 1,900,905
1,900,905 1,473,648 1,272
1,272
Podium
Podium Overall
Retail Efficiency
Retail
Overall
OverallEfficiency
Total
Total
Efficiency
77.5%
1.5%
1.5%
77.5%
77.5%
100.0%
100.0%
28,514
28,514
1,900,905
1,900,905 1,473,648
18,534
18,534
1,473,648 1,272
1,272
Parking
Parking Serviced
A Overall
OverallEfficiency
Serviced
AA Serviced
Total GFA
Apartments
Efficiency
Apartments
Apartments 77.5%
77.5%
1,482,706 fs
(4.5
(4.5 floors)
floors) Total
TotalGFA GFA 1,482,706
1,482,706 fsfs

C
less MainApartments
AA Serviced
Serviced Foyer & facilities
Apartments 3% 44,481 fs
less
lessMain MainFoyer Foyer&&facilities facilities 3%
3% 44,481
44,481 fsfs
GFA GFA
Total
Total for
GFA Serviced Apartments 1,438,224 fsfs
1,482,706
1,482,706
GFA
GFAfor for Serviced
ServicedApartments Apartments 1,438,224
1,438,224 fsfs
Facilities
Facilities Floor
Floor
NFAMain
less
less for Serviced
Main Foyer
Foyer && Apartments
facilities
facilities 80.0%
3%
3% 1,151,160
NFA
NFAfor forServiced
ServicedApartments Apartments 80.0%
80.0% 1,151,160 fs
44,481
44,481
1,151,160 fsfs
fs
GFA
GFAfor forServiced
ServicedApartments Apartments 1,438,224
1,438,224 fsfs
Proposed
NFA
NFA for
for Unit mix
Serviced
Serviced Apartments
Apartments 80.0%
80.0% 1,151,160
1,151,160 fsfs Serviced Apt
Proposed
ProposedUnit Unitmix mix Serviced
ServicedApt Apt
Unit size (fs) % of units Total NFATotal no. of units Avg Units/flloorNFA/floor (fs) Eff GFA/floo
Unit
Unitsize size(fs) (fs) %%ofofunits
units Total
TotalNFATotal
NFATotalno. no.of ofunits
units Avg
AvgUnits/flloorNFA/
Units/flloorNFA/floor (fs) Eff GFA/floo
Retail
Retail 650
Proposed
Proposed
650
850
Unit
Unit
850 size size(fs)
Unit
(fs)
Unit mix
mix
%%of
40%
40%
40%
of units
40%units Total
Total
330,720
330,720
432,480
NFATotal
NFATotalno.
432,480
509
509
509
no.
509 of
ofunits
units
Serviced
Avg
Serviced Apt 44
Apt
AvgUnits/flloorNFA/floor4
Units/flloorNFA/floor
4
2,600
2,600
3,400
(fs)
(fs) Eff
3,400 EffGFA/floo
GFA/floo
1200
650
650 15%
40%
40% 228,960
330,720
330,720 191
509
509 1.5
44 1,800
2,600
2,600
1200 15% 228,960 191 1.5 1,800
2500
850
850 5%
40%
40% 159,000
432,480
432,480 50964
509 0.5
44 1,250
3,400
3,400
T. R.2500 Hamzah & Yeang Sdn Bhd 5% 159,000 64 0.5 1,250
Total
1200
1200 NFA NFA 100.0%
15%
15% 1,151,160
228,960
228,960 1272
191
191 10
1.5
1.5 7,800
1,800
1,800 78% 78% 10
Total 100.0% 1,151,160 1272 10 7,800 10
Proposed No. of units
2500
2500 MMixed-use
per floor D
per floor Development m 5% on Lot
5% 10 units 55547 (SiteB),
159,000
159,000 B Jalan 6464 D Damansara,
m PJ for ARC ARC0.5 RResources
0.5 1,250
1,250
Ground
Ground floor
floor No. of units
Total 2NFA no. of floors
10 units
127 10,000 fs GFA1272 per floor (average)

Site A: Basis for Design For Development Order

OOption Total
TotalNFA no.(PR R floors1:8) 100.0%
100.0%127 1,151,160
1,151,160
10,000 fs GFA1272 10
10 7,800
7,800 78% 78% 10
10
Sub-
Sub- Date: No.
No.
No.
No. 16of of
of towers
units
June
of units
towers
of
2022 per
perfloorfloor 1022 units
10 units
per floor (average)

Basement
Basement No.
Total
Totalof ofno.
no.floors
of offloorsper tower
floors 12764
127 10,000
10,000 fsfsGFA GFAper perfloor
floor(average)
(average)

Access Point to Land Suitable for

No. floors per tower 64
1. Site No.
No.Information
ofoftowers
towers 22
(2
(2 floors)
floors)
Visual Analysis
B Office
B No. No.of
Office offloors
floorsper pertowertower 64
(acres)64 (sq.ft) (sq.m)

Plot Ratio View

View from
from East
East Total
T. R.Land Hamzah GFA& Yeang Sdn Bhd 389,685 fs

Site Orientation Development

Total Area
GFA 7.740 337,154 fs
389,685 31,334
T.
BBR. NFA
Office
Land Hamzah
Office & Yeang for
surrendered Sdnroad Bhdwidening 78% 303,955 fs
NFA 78%0 303,9550 fs 0
Proposed
T. R. No.
Total
TotalHamzah
of
GFA
GFA &M
floors Mixed-use
Yeang Sdn BhdD Development m on 25 Lot 55547 (SiteB),
12,000
389,685
389,685 fsfsBper Jalanfloor D Damansara,
m PJ for ARC ARCRResources
R.Nett Land Area 7.740 337,154 floor 31,334

1:8
ProposedNo. of floors&M Mixed-use DDevelopment m on 25
Lot 55547 12,000
(SiteB), fsBper Jalan DDamansara,
m PJ for ARC ARCRResources
OT.
Option
T. NFA
R. NFA
Hamzah
Hamzah 2 (PR &R
Yeang
Yeang1:8)Sdn Sdn Bhd
Bhd
78%
78% 303,955
303,955 fsfs
Proposed
T. R. Hamzah &
ODate:
Option
C Retail16 2floors
June (PRM Mixed-use
Yeang Sdn Bhd
R 1:8)
2022 DDevelopment m on Lot 55547 (SiteB), B Jalan D Damansara,
m PJ for ARC ARCRResources
O Proposed
No.
No.
C Total
Option
ofof
Retailplinth floors
2 (PR MMixed-use
R area1:8) DDevelopment m on50% Lot 55547
25
25 12,000(SiteB),
12,000
168,577 fsfsB Jalan
per
per floor
floor DDamansara,
15,667 m PJ for ARC ARCRResources
Proposed
Date:
T.ProposedTotal 16
R. Hamzah & M June
GFA M Mixed-use
2022
Mixed-use Sdn BhdD D Development
Development m
m on
on80% Lot
Lot 55547 55547 (SiteB),
28,514
(SiteB), fsB Jalan DDamansara,
m PJ for ARC
ARC
ARCR RResources
OOption Total
Basement 2 (PR
GFA Yeang
R 1:8)
plinth area (assumed) 28,514
269,724 fsB Jalan DDamansara,
25,067 m PJ for ARC Resources

DraftPlan
Site Massing Project Information
ODate:
Option 16Information
June
22 (PR 2022
R
O1.C Site
Option
C
Date:
Proposed
Total
Retail
Retail
Proposed
Total
NFA
NFA
16 June M(PR R 1:8)
for
Plot
for
2022
Mixed-use
Retail
1:8)
Ratio
Retail
DDevelopment m
65%
65%
on(acres)
Lot 5554728,514
18,534 fs(Zoning Commercial)
18,534 8.0 fs
(SiteB),
1.
Date:Site
Total
Total
Total 16Information
June
floors
GFA
GFA 2022 1 floor (sq.ft)B
28,514 fsfs Jalan D(sq.m) Damansara,
m PJ for ARC ARCRResources
Date: Max.
Total 16 permissible
June
floors2022 GFA 1 floor2,697,235 sq.ft
OOption
1. Site
Total
Total 2NFA (PR
Information
LandNFA Area Rfor
for1:8)
Retail
Retail (acres)
7.740
65%
65% (sq.ft)
337,154
18,534
18,534 fsfs (sq.m)
31,334
1. Site Information (acres) (sq.ft)0 (sq.m)0
Date:
1.D Site
Total Land
Land
Total Area
surrendered
16 Information
Carpark June
floors
floors 2022
Requirement for road (as widening
per DBKL calculation) 7.740 floor 337,154
110floor 31,334
2.1.DProposed
Site
Carpark
Land
Information
AreaRequirement (as per DBKL calculation)
Development (acres)
7.740 (sq.ft)
337,154 (sq.m)
31,334
LandLand
Nett surrendered Area for road widening 7.7400cps@ 0 NFA (65%) (sq.m)0
Res
Residential
den a ToweTower
Serviced apartments 1928
(acres) @ 1cps 337,154
(sq.ft)
/ 500fs 31,334
Serviced
Landsurrendered
Areaapartments (acres)
1928
7.740 cps@ @ % 1cps
of (sq.ft)
GFA
337,154 / 500fs NFA GFA
Total (65%)(sq.m)
(fs)0
31,334 NFA(fs) Units
1.DDSite Land
Nett
Office Land
Information
Land Area Area for road widening 7.740 0
546 cps@ @ 1cps 337,154 0
/ 500fs NFA (70%) 31,334
Carpark
Carpark
Land
Office
Land
Serviced Requirement
Requirement
Area
surrendered
Apartments for (as
(as
road per
per DBKL
DBKL
widening calculation)
calculation)
7.740
546 0 cps @@ 337,154
1cps
63.0% / 500fs
0 NFA (70%)31,334
1,699,258 0 1,332,160 1,472
(Block
B ock AA && BB : 49
49 floo
floors)
s Nett
LandLand
Total
Retail
Serviced
Serviced
LandLand
Retail
SOHO
Land
Nett
Nett Area
Total
Basement
Total
Office
Office
plinth
surrendered
plinth
Land
Car
Area
apartments
apartments
surrendered area
area
plinth
Area
Park
for road widening
Area for road widening
area (assumed)
Requirement
7.740
(acres)
50%
1928
192840
7.740
7.740
50%cps
80%
7.740
2,513
546
546
0cps
400cps@cps
cps@
cps
@@
@ 1cps
@1cps
337,154
1cps
1cps(sq.ft)
168,577
25.5%
337,154
337,154
168,577
269,724
337,154
1cps
/ / 500fs
/ 500fs
//500fs
0 NFA
500fs
0 NFA (70%)
500fsNFA
NFA
NFA(70%)
31,334
(sq.m)
(70%)
(65%)
(65%)
(70%)
15,667
31,3340
687,795
31,334
15,667
25,067
31,334
0
531,000 600

(10
10 ununits
s / floo
floor)
Nett Land
Total
Office Car AreaRequirement
Park 7.740
2,513 cps 168,577 337,154
10.0% 31,334
269,724 210,384
LandTotal
RetailBasement
Proposed
Retail plinth
surrendered areaRatio
plinth
Plot for road
area widening
(assumed) 50%
80%
40
400 cpscps@ @1cps 269,724
1cps //8.00500fs
500fs (Zoning
NFA
NFA(70%) 15,667
Commercial)
(70%)25,067 0
Retail
Total plinth
Basement areaarea (assumed)
plinth 50%
80% 1.5%
168,577
269,724 (Zoning 40,459
15,667
Commercial)
25,067 26,298
Nett
Total Proposed
Elevated
Max. Land
TotalCar
Total permissible
plinth Plot
Area
Carpark area Ratio GFA 7.740
50%cps 337,154
2,697,235
168,577 8.0 sq.ft 31,334
15,667
TotalCar
Elevated
Total Park
Park
Carpark
plinth Requirement
areaRequirement 2,513
2,513
50% cps 269,724 168,577 (Zoning2,697,235
100.0% 15,667
Basement
Proposed
Elevated
Max.
Basement permissible
plinth
Plot
plinthRatio
carpark area plate
floor
area GFA
(assumed)
(assumed)
80%
118,807
80% fs fs per 2,697,235
floor
269,[email protected]%
(@ sq.ft of plinth area) 2,099,842
25,067
Commercial)
25,067
2,072
Elevated
Basement
Proposed
Overall carpark
plinth
EfficiencyPlot floor
area plate
Ratio (assumed) 118,807
80% per floor 269,724(@
@8.050% of plinth
(Zoning area)
Commercial)
25,067
2. ProposedMax.
Total
TotalProposed
Elevated
Elevated permissible
cps
plinth per elevated
area
Plot
Development
Carpark
Carpark Ratio GFAcarpark floor 339 cps/flr2,697,235
50% @77.9%
(@
168,577 8.0 sq.ft
350fs/cps) (Zoning Commercial)
15,667
Total
Proposed
Max. cps per
permissible elevated
Plot Ratio GFA carpark floor 339 cps/flr2,697,235 (@
@ 350fs/cps)8.0 sq.ft (Zoning Commercial)
Total
Elevated
Elevated elevated
carpark
carpark carpark
floor
floor floors
plate
plate 118,807
118,8074.2 floors
Basement
2. Proposed Max. permissible
Total
Max. elevated
Serviced
plinthcarpark
Development
permissible
Apartments
area GFA (assumed)
GFAfloors
80%4.2 fsfloors
fsperperfloor
%floor
of (@
269,724
2,697,235(@50%
GFA
2,697,235 sq.ft
50% sq.ftof
ofplinth
Totalplinth
GFA area)
area)
25,067 (fs) NFA(fs) Units
T.2.AR.Proposed
Est.
TotalHamzah
Total
Proposed total
Serviced cps&per
cps carpark
Development
perYeang
Plot elevated
ApartmentsRatiospaces
Sdn
elevated Bhd provided
carpark
carpark floor
floor 1,427
339 cps %
339 cps/flr
cps/flr (@ 8.0 (Zoning
(@of63.0%
350fs/cps)
350fs/cps)
GFA TotalCommercial)
GFA (fs) 1,332,160
1,699,258 NFA(fs) Units
1,472
Est.
Total
2. Proposed total
GFA carpark
Development spaces provided 1,427 cps 1,699,258 fs Total GFA (fs)
Total
Total
Total
Max.
2. Proposed Serviced
SOHO podium
elevated
elevated
permissible carpark
carpark
Apartments
Development carpark
GFA area
floors
floors 499,3684.2 fs 2,697,235
4.2 floors
floors % of25.5%GFA sq.ft
63.0% 1,699,258
687,795 1,332,160 NFA(fs)
531,000Towers Units
1,472
600
Proposed Total
2. Proposed
less podium
Main MMixed-usecarpark
Development
Foyer & area
facilities DDevelopment m 499,368
on Lot
3% fs5554750,978 (SiteB), B fs Jalan DDamansara,
m PJ for
Towers ARC
ARC RResources
Serviced Apartments % of GFA
63.0% Total GFA (fs) NFA(fs) Units
Est.
Est.SOHO total
Officetotalcarpark
carpark spaces
spacesprovided provided 1,427
1,427 cps cps % of GFA Total1,699,258
25.5%
10.0% 687,795
269,724
GFA (fs) 1,332,160 531,000
210,384
NFA(fs) 1,472
600
Units

Site A: Basis for Design For Development Order

OOption GFA
Total Serviced
Basement
SOHO
Total
2. Proposed Office
Retail
2 (PR
for
podium
podium RCarpark
Serviced 1:8)Apartments
Apartments
carpark
Developmentcarpark area
area 499,368
499,368 fsfs
% of63.0%
1,648,280 GFA fs Total1,699,258
25.5%
10.0%
1.5%
GFA (fs) 1,332,160
687,795
269,724
40,459
NFA(fs)
531,000
210,384
26,298Towers
Units Serv. Apt
1,472
600 Serv.
SOHO
SOHO Towe
Tower
Serviced
Basement Apartments
Carpark 63.0% 1,699,258 1,332,160 Towers 1,472 Serv. Apt Serv.
Date:NFA Serviced
SOHO
16
Basement for
June Apartments
Serviced
2022
carpark Apartments
floor plate 80.8%
190,090 fs per floor 63.0% assuming
1,332,160
25.5% fs 1,699,258
687,795
80% of site 1,332,160
area 531,000 1,472
600
Office
Retail 10.0%
1.5% assuming 269,724
40,459 210,384
26,298
Total
SOHO carpark floor plate
Basement
SOHO 190,090 fs per%floor of100.0%
GFA
25.5%
25.5%
Total GFA 2,697,235
687,795
80%
687,795
(fs)
of site areaNFA(fs)
2,099,842
531,000
531,000
Units
2,072
600
600
Officeroom/services 10.0% 269,724 210,384
(Block
B ock C
C : 43
43 floo
floors)
s
M&ERetail
Basement
Basement
Total
Serviced
Overall Carpark
Carpark
Apartments
Efficiency
Officeroom/services 95,045 fs 1.5% say 50%1,699,258
100.0%
63.0%
77.9%
10.0% of269,724
basement1,332,160
40,459
2,697,235 floor 26,298
2,099,842
210,384 2,072 Serv.
1,472 Serv.Apt
Apt Serv.
Serv.
M&E Office 95,045 fs 10.0% say 50% of basement
269,724 floor210,384
1. Site Proposed
Retail
Total
Basement Information
Total
Basement cps perUnit
carpark
carpark mix
basement floor
floor carpark
plate
plate floor 190,090543
190,090 cps/flr
fs
fs per
per (@
@
floor
floor 1.5%assuming
350fs/cps)
100.0% assuming 80%
80% 40,459
2,697,235 of
of site
site area
area 26,298 Serviced2,072
2,099,842 Apt
SOHO Overall
RetailcpsEfficiency
Total per basement carpark floor 543 cps/flr (@ @25.5%
77.9%
1.5%
350fs/cps) 687,795
40,459 531,000
26,298 600
(14
14 un
units
s / floo
floor) UnitRetail size (fs) carpark floors % of95,045
units 1.5%Total no.2,697,235 40,459 26,298
Total
Total basement (acres) fs Total
2.0 fsfloor NFA
100.0%
(sq.ft) ofbasement
units floor
(sq.m) 2,099,842 Avg Units/flloor 2,072NFA/floor (fs) Eff GFA/floo

Plot Ratio
M&E
M&EOverall
Office room/services
Servicedroom/services
Efficiency
Apartments 95,045 77.9%
10.0% say
say50% 50% of of basement
269,724 floor
210,384
T.AR. 650
Land
Total
TotalHamzah
Total
Overall
basement
Area & Yeang
Efficiency
carpark
Sdn Bhd floors
40%
2.0
7.740
floor 100.0%
100.0%
382,720
337,154
77.9% 589
2,697,235
2,697,235
31,334
2,099,842
2,099,842Facilities 2,072
2,072
4 2,600
Est.
Total
Total
Retail total
cps
Serviced cps carpark
per
per basement
basementspacescarpark provided
carpark floor
floor 1,086
543 cps
543 cps/flr
cps/flr1,699,258
(@
(@ 350fs/cps)
350fs/cps)
1.5% 40,459 26,298 Facilities
T.AR. Est.
850
Land
Total
Overall
Hamzah
Overall
GFA
total &Apartments
carparkYeangspaces
Efficiency
Efficiency
surrendered Sdnroad
for Bhdprovided
widening
1,086
40% 2.0
cps
0 floor
77.9%
77.9%
500,480 0
fs
589 0 4 3,400
Proposed
T. AR. Total
Total
Total
Serviced
TotalTotal
Total
less
Hamzah
basement
basement
basement
GFA
basement
Main &M Mixed-use
Apartments
Foyer
Yeang
area
carpark
carpark
area
&Sdn BhdD
facilities floors
floors
Development m 190,090 on 2.0
190,090 Lot
3%
fs
floor
fs 55547 100.0% (SiteB),
1,699,258
50,978 Bfs Jalan 2,697,235 DDamansara,
m 2,099,842PJ Podium
for ARC
Podium
CP
ARC
2,072R
CP Resources
AR. 1200
Nett Land
Serviced Area
Apartments 15% 7.740 cps 264,960
337,154 fs 22131,334 (4.2forflrs) 1.5 1,800

1:8
Proposed
OT.
OptionEst.
Est.
Total total
total
Hamzah GFA
2 &M Mixed-use
carpark
carpark
(PR RYeang spaces
1:8) &spaces
Sdn Bhd D Development
provided
provided m on
1,086
1,086 Lot cps 55547 1,699,258(SiteB), B Jalan D Damansara,
m PJ
Facilities
Facilities ARC
ARC R Resources
Office
Office Towe
Tower A less
Overall
GFA
ServicedMain
for Foyer
Efficiency
Serviced
Apartments facilities
Apartments 3% 50,978
77.9%
1,648,280 fs (4.2 flrs)
T.5AR.2500 Hamzah
Serviced GFA& Yeang
Apartments Sdn Bhd

A
Proposed
T.5R. Total
Total Total
TotalHamzah
less built-up
basement
basement
Main M
& Mixed-use
Yeang
Foyer area
area
area
& Sdn (GFA+CP+M&E)
Bhd
facilities DDevelopment m 5%
2,200,677
on
190,090
190,090 Lot
3% fs
fs 55547 184,000(SiteB),
1,699,258
50,978 B fs Jalan
fs 74 D Damansara,
m PJGrdfor
Podium
Podium(1 ARC
flr)
ARC
CP
CP 0.5RResources 1,250
ODate:
Option Total
GFA
NFA
Total
16 June 2 (PR
built-up
for
GFA R 1:8)
Serviced
2022 areaApartments
(GFA+CP+M&E) 2,200,677 80.8%fs A A1,648,280 Fusion offsExciting Space
1,332,160
1,699,258 Grd (1 flr)
Proposed Total
Tower
less GFAM
2height
Main Mixed-use
Foyer (Total DDevelopment
floors)
& Apartments
facilities m on Lotfloors
70
3% 55547 (SiteB),
1,699,258
50,978 Bfsfs Jalan DDamansara,
m PJ(4.2forflrs)ARC
ARC (20.0RResources -
(Block
B ock DD : 18
18 floo
floors)
s
Total plinth area 50% 168,577 15,667 Basement flr)
OOption
Proposed (PR M R
20221:8)
Mixed-use D (4.2 flrs)
DDevelopment m on Lot 55547 (SiteB), B Jalan D
DDamansara,
m PJ for ARC
ARC RResources
GFA for Serviced 1,648,280

C
AR.Serviced
T.Date: NFA
Tower 16 Main
less Juneheight
Apartments
Foyer (Total floors)
& facilities 80.8%
70
3% floors1 Lap 1,332,160
Pool
50,978 Basement (2 flr)
Proposed M Mixed-use Development m 100.0% on Lot fsfs55547 (SiteB), Bfs
fs Jalan Damansara,
m PJGrdfor ARC
ARC 10R Resources

B
Hamzah
OOption Total
GFA
Basement NFA2 &(PR
less built-up
Main
for Yeang
Foyer
R
Serviced
plinth 1:8)Sdn
area Bhd
& facilities
Apartments
(assumed) 80%3% 50,978
1,332,160
1,648,280
269,724 fs 147225,067 9,050Diagram
Schematic 78% 11

E D
55 Total
Total built-up area
area (GFA+CP+M&E)
(GFA+CP+M&E) 2,200,677
2,200,677 Grd (1(1flr)
flr)

Draft Massing
NFA for Serviced mixApartments 80.8% 1,332,160 fsfs

Project Information
ODate:
Option
1. Total
Site 16Information
Proposed
GFA June
GFA 2 (PR
for (PR 2022
R
Unit1:8)
Serviced Apartments 2 1,699,258
Jacuzzi
1,648,280 Lounges fs Serviced Apt Schematic Diagram
OOption
6 Tower
Date:
Proposed No. GFA
Construction
Proposed
NFA
Tower 16ofJune 2
units
for
height R
Plotper
Serviced
height 2022 1:8)
Costfloor
Ratio
(Total
(Total Apartments
floors)
floors) 10 floors
80.8%
70
70 floors 1,648,280
units 1,332,160 8.0 (Zoning fs Commercial) Basement
Basement (2
(2 flr)
flr)
1. 6Site
Date: Construction
less NFA forM
Main
Proposed
16Information
Unit size
June Mixed-use
FoyerUnitCost
(fs)
Serviced
2022 &mix facilities DDevelopment
Apartments m % ofon(acres) Lot 55547
3%
units
80.8% 3 Jumping
Total (SiteB),
50,978
1,332,160NFAJets
(sq.ft) BfsTotal
fsandJalan ofD
Splash
no. Damansara,
(sq.m)m
Pool
units PJAvgforUnits/flloor
ARC
ServicedARCAptRResourcesNFA/floor (fs) Eff GFA/flo
Date: NFA
Client's
Total
Max. forBudget
16 permissible
June
no. Serviced
of2022 floors Apartments
GFA 80.8%
500
147 per fs2,697,235 1,332,160
NFA11,603 sq.ft fsfsGFA 736,824,236
per floor (average)
OOption
1. SiteGFA Proposed
Client's
Unit
650
Land 2
for (PR
Information
size R
Budget Unit
(fs)
Serviced
Area 1:8) mix Apartments % of40% 500 per4fs1,648,280
units
(acres)
7.740 NFA
Total
Green NFA
(sq.ft)
382,720
337,154 Cabanas fsTotal 736,824,236
no.589 of31,334
units
(sq.m) AvgServiced Apt 4Schematic
Units/flloor
Schematic(fs)
NFA/floor
Diagram
Diagram
2,600 Eff GFA/flo

Common Facilities
Fac
Facilities
es FFloor
oo 66 Site
1.
Date:
1. Site
No.
NFA
2.1.Proposed
Site
No.
650
Land
850
Land
ofsize
Proposed
Construction
Construction
Unit towers
Information
forsurrendered
16 Information
Unit
Client's
Client's
June
Proposed
Proposed
Serviced
Area
Information
ofsizefloors
2022
Budget
Budget
Unit
(fs) Cost
Unit mix
Unit
(fs)
mix
Cost
permix
for road widening % of
Apartments
tower % of
40%
RM
units
(acres)
80.8%
psf
units
500
3
7.7400 5 1,332,160
49 perfsfsTotal
500
Total
Area
NFA0fs
(sq.ft)
382,720
337,154
500,480
Gallery
(fs)
NFA Total
Total no.589
no.
of31,334
units0
(sq.m)
RM
of(sq.m)
units
Avg
Avg
Serviced
Units/flloor
Serviced
Serviced
Apt NFA/floor (fs) Eff GFA/flo
Apt 4
Units/flloor
2,600
3,400
Apt NFA/floor (fs) Eff GFA/flo
650
Land
850
LandLand
1200
Nett AreaDevelopment
surrendered Area for road widening 40%
RM
40%
15% psf0per
(acres)
7.740 NFA
NFA (sq.ft)
382,720
Area
337,154(fs)
500,480
264,960
6 Children
736,824,236
0 Total no.
Playground
736,824,236
589
589of31,334
221 RM0 1.544 NFA/floor2,600
3,400
1,800
Res
Residential
den a Towe Tower
7.740 337,154 31,334
aUnit
650
Land
size
Serviced
Unit size
Area(fs)
(fs)
Apartments % of
% of 40%
units
(acres)
350
units
(acres)
7.740 %
Total
1,482,706
Total
NFA
(sq.ft)
NFA Total
(sq.ft)
382,720
of GFA
337,154 518,946,967
Totalno.589
units
(sq.m)
of31,334
GFA units
(sq.m)
(fs)0
Avg Units/flloor
NFA(fs)Avg Units/flloor Units44 NFA/floor 2,600
(fs) Eff GFA/flo
(fs) Eff GFA/flo
1. Site a 850
Land
Serviced
1200
Nett
Proposed
2500
650 surrendered
Land
Information
Land Area Apartments
Areamix
Unit for road widening 40%
15% 350 0
5%7.740 7 Maze
40% 500,480
1,482,706
264,960
184,000
337,154 0
Garden 136,389,908
382,720 589
518,946,967
221
74 31,334
589 Serviced Apt0.5 1.54 3,400
1,800
1,250
2,600
b.850
SOHO
B Serviced Offices
650
Land
Land Area
surrendered
Apartments for road widening RM
RM
40% 350
7.740
psf
psf 0 389,685
Area
Area382,720
337,154
(fs)
63.0%(fs)
500,480 0 589 31,334
1,699,258 RM
RM 0 1,332,160 1,472 4 2,600
3,400
(Block
B ock AA && BB : 49
49 floo
floors)
s AUnit 1200
b.Nett
AOffices
2500
850
Total
Land Land
Fusion
size (fs)
plinth
surrendered Area
of Exciting
area for Space
road widening % of15%
5%
units350
7.740
(acres)
40% 50% 0 8Total 264,960
389,685
NFA0Total 136,389,908
337,154
184,000
(sq.ft)
Gymnasium
500,480
168,577 no.221 74 31,334
of(sq.m)
589 units0
15,667 Avg Units/flloor 1.5
0.04NFA/floor1,800
0.5 1,250
-
(fs)
3,400 Eff GFA/floo
ac.2500
Total
aSOHO
c.
Shops
850
Land
Serviced
Serviced
1200
Nett
Shops
surrendered
GFA
Land Apartments
Apartments
Area for road widening 15%
5%
2500 1,482,706
40%7.740
350
350
250
28,514
500,480
25.5%0 fs 518,946,967
687,795
1,482,706
264,960
337,154
184,000
28,514
7,128,392
589
518,946,967
221
74 31,3340
687,795
7,128,392 531,000 6001.54
0.5
3,400
1,800
1,250
1Land
650 Lap
Total Pool
NFA
Area 100.0%
40% 7.740 1,332,160
382,720
337,154 1472
589 31,334 0.0
410 -
9,050
1,800 78%
2,600 1
G
Ground/Bridge
ound sB dge
1200
d.Basement
Nett plinth
Land areaarea (assumed)
plinth
Area 50%
15%7.740
80% 168,577
264,960
269,724
337,154 22115,667
25,067
31,334 1.5
(10
10 un
units / floo
floor)
less
b.Office
b. Carpark
1200
Nett Main
Offices
Offices
2500 LandFoyer Podium
Area& facilities 15% 3%
5%7.740
35080
350 499,368
264,960
20,634
10.0% fs 136,389,908
337,154
389,685
389,685
184,000 39,949,412
221
136,389,908
74 31,334
269,724 210,384 1.5
0.5 1,800
1,250
d.Total
2Land
850 Carpark
Jacuzzi
No.
Basement
Proposed
2500 plinth
NFA
surrendered
of units Podium
Lounges area
perRatio
plinth
Plot for
floor
area road widening
(assumed) 5% 50%
100.0%
40% 80
80% 010 units B Other 499,368
168,577
1,332,160
500,480
269,724
184,000 0 (Zoning
Facilities
8.0 39,949,412
1472
589 74 15,667
Commercial)
25,067 0 0.0
410
0.5 3,400-
9,050
1,250 78% 1
e.
GFA
c.RetailBasement
2500
c.Total
Shops
Shops
Total for SOHO
plinth (semi
areaarea natural ventilated) 5% 150
250
250
50% 190,090
184,000
667,161
1.5% fs(Zoning
28,514
28,514
168,577 28,513,570
74
7,128,392
7,128,392
40,459
15,667 26,298 0.5
0.0 1,250
-
linkage
nkage
e.
1200
3Nett Basement
Basement
Jumping
No.
Total
Max. of
Proposed
LandNFAunits
no.
permissible (semi
plinth
Jets
Plot
Area
of and
per
floors natural
Splash
floor
Ratio GFA ventilated)
(assumed)
Pool 100.0%
15% 150
80%
7.74014710 units
1 190,090
1,332,160
269,724
264,960
337,154
11,603
Reading
2,697,235 8.0 Room fs
sq.ftGFA 28,513,570
1472
221 Commercial)
25,067
31,334
per floor (average) 1.510
0.0 9,050
1,800 - 78% 1
f.d.Total
External plinth works area/ landscape 50% 168,577 fs 39,949,412 15,667
NFA
d.Total forNFA
Carpark
Carpark
Basement
f.Proposed
No.External
of
SOHO
plinth
units
Podium
Podium
area/floor
plinth
works
Plotper area
Ratiolandscape(assumed) say RM1mil/ac
79.6%
100.0%
5% 80%
say RM1mil/ac 80
80
50%103 units
531,000
499,368
499,368
168,577 (Zoning
1,332,160
100.0%
269,724 8.0 sq.ft
5,450,000
39,949,412
1472 15,667
2,697,235
5,450,00025,067 2,099,842
Commercial) 2,0720.010 -
9,050 78% 1
42500 Total
Green
No.
Max.
Basement
Total no. of
Cabanas
ofConstruction
towers
permissible
NFA floors
plinth area GFA (assumed)
Cost 100.0% 147
80%
284
184,000
11,603
2,697,235
1,332,160
2 2,590,363
Multipurpose
269,724 fsHall
GFA 74 per
1472
736,378,249 floor (average) 640 psf NFA (excl.
25,067 0.510 1,250
9,050 78% 1

Option 1 Option 2 Option 3

Total
e.Overall
e. Basement
Basement
Basement NFA
No. ofConstruction
Proposed units (semi
(semi
plinth
Efficiency perRatio
Plot natural
areanatural
floor ventilated)
ventilated)
(assumed) 100.0% 150
150
80% 10 units 1,332,160
190,090
190,090
269,724
77.9% 8.0 sq.ft 1472
28,513,570
28,513,570
(Zoning Commercial)
25,067 10 carpark sales)
9,050 78% 1
Total
Total
Max. no. ofPlot
permissible
towers floors GFA Cost 284
147 103 units 3 2,590,36311,603
2,697,235 736,378,249
fs(Zoning
GFA per floor (average) 640 psf NFA (excl. 0.0 carpark sales)-
2. 5Proposed
Total Gallery
No. of
Proposed floors
plinth
units area perRatio
per
Development tower
floor 50% 49 Sauna
168,577 &8.0Changing Commercial)
Room
15,667
f.Proposed
f.Max.
External
External
No.
Proposed works
works
ofpermissible
units ofPlot
Unit per //landscape
landscape
floor
Ratio
mix say
sayRM1mil/ac
RM1mil/ac 10 units2,697,235 8.0 sq.ft fs(Zoning Commercial)
5,450,000
5,450,000 SOHO
Re
Retail
a
Total no. floors GFA 147 11,603 GFA per floor (average)
G
Ground
ound floo
floor A Total
No.
Total
2.76Proposed
Unit
2.7BProposed
No.
Max.
Total
Max.
No.
Serviced
of
Development
Total
NFA
of
Children
Basement
Total
size
Development
No. No.
SOHO
7Proposed
Maze
No.
of
ofof
Serviced
Land of
towers
floors
no.Development
permissible
Construction
Construction
no.
floors
units
Cost
of
(fs)
permissible
towers
per
Playground
plinth
of floors
Cost
floors
Apartments
Development
Garden
towers Plotper Cost
per
Apartments floor
Ratio
tower
areaGFA
GFA
tower
(assumed)
Cost
Cost %
100.0%
of
80%
284
units284
147
3
49
147 42,590,363
3
493units
10
1,332,160
269,724
Kindergaten
%
Total
11,603
of
2,697,235
2,590,363 GFA sq.ft
11,603
NFA
2,697,235
% of63.0%
5 Barbeque 8.0 Area
GFA
Total
fs GFA
fs GFA
sq.ft
(Zoning
1472
Total
no.
25,067
per
GFA
736,378,249
736,378,249
per
of
TotalCommercial)
floor
(fs)(average)
floor
units (average)
GFA (fs) 1,332,160
1,699,258
NFA(fs)
640
640 Authority
psf
Avgpsf NFA
NFA
Units/flloor
NFA(fs)Authority
10
Units
Contributions
(excl.
(excl. carpark
carpark
NFA/floor
Contributions
Units
1,472
9,050
sales)
sales)
(fs)
78%
Eff
11
RM
GFA/floo
RM
650
2.BProposed No. of
Total
Land GFA
Cost towers
floors per tower
Development 20%1,500
1,500 493psf (assumed) 78,000 fs 356,419,620
1,699,258 120 ISF Contribution 2.8 (2k/unit) 1,820 2,544
14749psf (assumed) % 11,603
of25.5%
GFA sq.ft 356,419,620
Total GFAfloor(fs) NFA(fs) ISF Contribution 600 (2k/unit)
Units 2,544

Spine Cluster Hub

2. Total
8Max. SOHO
Gymnasium
Total
Serviced
No.
SOHO no.
ofGFA of
permissible
floors floors
per GFA
Apartments tower 687,795
2,697,23563.0% fsfsGFA per
1,699,258
687,795 (average)1,332,160
531,000Puas 1,472
77BProposed
2. Total
850 No. Main
Development
Development
Proposed
less of Development
Construction
floors per
Cost
Cost
Development
Foyer Cost
tower
& facilities 30% 3%49 %153,000
50,978
of GFA fsfs Total
736,378,249
180GFA (fs) NFA(fs)Authority
Authoritycontribution,
4.2 (0.25%
Contributions
Contributions
Units 3,570 GDV) 4,458
RM
RM
Pod
Podium
um PaParking
k ng
Total
SOHO
Serviced Construction
Apartments Cost 63.0% 736,378,249
1,699,258 Puas contribution, (0.25% GDV) 4,458
No. Total
less
SOHO GFA
ofMain
towers Foyer &(say)
facilities 3%3 687,795
20,634
25.5% 687,795 (fs) 1,332,160 531,000 1,472
600 10 sen/fs

Sectional Diagram
Land Office
Professional
Land Cost
Cost Fees 8.0% 1,500
1,500 psf
psf of % TCC
(assumed)
(assumed) of10.0%
GFA Total 356,419,620269,724
GFA
58,910,260
356,419,620 210,384
NFA(fs)ISF
Plan
ISF Fees, Units
Contribution
Contributionsay (2k/unit)
(2k/unit) 220,
2,544,
2,544
1000
B GFA SOHO
Servicedfor
Professional Serviced
Apartments
Fees Apartments
(say) 50%
8.0% 49 % 300,000
of63.0%
of1,648,280
TCC GFA fs Total 300 GFA (fs) 1,332,160
1,699,258 NFA(fs)Plan Fees,1,472 Units 7 7,000
BBNo.
2. Proposed Total
SOHO
less
GFA GFA
Main
ofsupervision
Other
Office
SOHO
Retail floors
for Foyer
Facilities
SOHO per(36
Development &
towerfacilities 3% 687,795
1.5% fs
25.5%
20,634
667,161
10.0% fs 58,910,260 687,795
269,724
40,459 531,000
210,384
26,298W say 10 sen/fs
600 220,
SOHO
SOHO Towe
Tower
Serviced Apartments 63.0% 1,699,258 1,332,160 1,472
Sub
Sub-Basement
Basemen
Site mths) 50,000 per1,332,160
month 1,800,000 IWK contribution (0.5% of GDV)
GDV) 8,916
above
above gground
ound (4 4
BTotal
NFA SOHO
Total
Total
SOHO
Site Construction
Serviced Construction
NFA
for GFA Apartments
Serviced
supervision (36 Cost
Cost
Apartments
mths) 100.0%
50,00080.8% per 531,000
63.0% fsfs
687,795
month 25.5% fs 736,378,249
736,378,249
6001,699,258
687,795
1,800,000 1,332,160
531,000Puas
Puas
W
IWK contribution,
contribution,
1,47214 (0.5%
600
contribution (0.25%
(0.25%
12,390
of GDV) 78% 4,458,
GDV) 4,458
15
8,916
less
Office
1 TotalGFA
NFA
Reading
Retail Main
for
GFA Foyer
SOHO
Room & facilities 3%
79.6% 20,634
10.0%
667,161
531,000
1.5% fsTotal GFA
687,795 269,724
40,459 210,384
26,298
No.
SOHO
Professional
Professional
Total
SOHO
less ofMain
Office GFA
units Fees
Feesfloor
per
Foyer &(say)
(say)
facilities 8.0%
8.0% 14 3% units ofof%TCCof
TCC GFA
100.0%
25.5%
687,795
25.5%
20,634
10.0% fs 58,910,260
2,697,235
687,795
58,910,260
687,795
269,724
(fs) NFA(fs)
2,099,842
531,000
531,000Plan
210,384 PlanFees,
Fees, Units
2,072
600 10sen/fs
say
say
60010 sen/fs 220,0
220,
(Block
B ock
s CC : 43
43 floo
floors)
s
GFA for SOHO 667,161
1.5% fs
(2
2 floo
floors)
s
SOHO
B 2ServicedRetail
NFA 79.6% 531,000 40,459 1,332,160 26,298
floo
floors) Site Multipurpose
Total
less
Overall
Office
Site Main Foyer
Apartments
Efficiency
supervision
supervision Hall
(36& facilities
(36 mths)
mths) 50,000
50,000 43 3%
3% per permonth 100.0%
month20,634
63.0%
77.9%
10.0% fs 2,697,235
1,699,258
269,724 2,099,842
210,384 2,072 (0.5%
1,472
less
Office
Total
GFA
Proposed
Retail
NFA
Total
Main
no. of
for SOHO
for SOHOFoyer
Unitfloorsmix& facilities
79.6%
20,634
10.0%
15,885
1.5% fsfs
667,161
531,000
100.0% fsGFA1,800,000
fs 1,800,000
per269,724
floor
40,459
2,697,235
(average) 26,298IWK
210,384
2,099,842
IWK contribution
contribution
Serviced Apt (0.5% ofofGDV)
2,072
GDV) 8,916,
8,916
Total
3SOHO Proposed
Overall
Retail GFA
Saunafor&Efficiency
GFA SOHO Unit mix
Changing Room 687,795
667,161
25.5%1.5% fs
77.9% fs 687,795
40,459 531,000
26,298 SOHO 600
(14
14 un
units
s / floo
floor) No.
UnitGFA
Retail
NFA
Totalofsizetowers
for SOHO
(fs) % of units79.6% 1 Total 667,161
1.5%Total
531,000
NFA
100.0% fs no.2,697,235of 40,459
units 26,298
2,099,842 Avg Units/flloor 2,072NFA/floor (fs) Eff GFA/floo
lessOverall
A4Office Main
Proposed
Unit
Kindergaten
NFA
Serviced
Total Foyer
forEfficiency
size SOHO Unit&mix
(fs)
Apartments facilities % of units 3%
79.6% 20,634
Total NFAfsTotal
77.9%
531,000
10.0%
100.0% fs no.2,697,235 of units
269,724 210,384 Avg
2,099,842 SOHOUnits/flloor
2,072 NFA/floor (fs) Eff GFA/flo
NFA offor SOHO 40%79.6% 531,000 fs

Site Plan
No.
650 Total
Overall
Proposed floors
Efficiency
Unitpermix tower 43 100.0%
382,720
77.9% 5892,697,235 2,099,842 SOHO 2,072 4 2,600
GFA
A5RetailUnit
650
Barbeque
Serviced
Total
Overall size
forGFA SOHO (fs)
Area
Apartments
Efficiency % of20% units Total
667,161 NFAfsTotal
78,000
1.5%
1,699,258
77.9% fs no. 120 of
40,459units 26,298 Avg Units/flloor 2.8 NFA/floor 1,820(fs) Eff GFA/flo
850 Overall
Proposed
Unit size Efficiency
Unit mix
(fs) % 40%
of units Total 77.9%
500,480 NFA Total 589
no. of units AvgSOHO
Units/flloor 4 3,400
A Total
NFA Serviced
650
850
Total for
Proposed
less GFA
Main SOHO Apartments
Unit mix
Foyer & facilities 20%
30%79.6% 3% 531,000
50,978fsfs
78,000
153,000
100.0%
1,699,258 120
180
2,697,235 2,099,842 SOHO 2,0724.2 2.8NFA/floor (fs) Eff GFA/flo
1,820
3,570
CA 1200 Proposed
Office
Unit
Serviced size (fs) Unit mix
Apartments %15%of units Total
264,960 NFA Total no. 221 of units AvgSOHOUnits/flloor 1.5 NFA/floor
1,800 (fs) Eff GFA/flo
650
Total
850
1000 GFA 20%
30%
50% 78,000
1,699,258
153,000
300,000 fs 120
180of units
300 2.8
4.27 NFA/floor 1,820
3,570
7,000
Office
Office Towe
Tower AOverallless
Unit Main
GFA
Serviced size
for Foyer & facilities
(fs)
Efficiency
Serviced
Apartments Apartments % of units3% Total 50,978
77.9%
1,648,280NFA Total fs no. Avg Units/flloor (fs) Eff GFA/flo
Unit GFA
Total
Serviced size (fs)
Apartments % 5%of units Total
269,724 NFA fsTotal fs no. of units Avg Units/flloor 2.8 NFA/floor (fs) Eff GFA/flo

A
A 2500 650
Total
850 GFA 20%
30% 78,000
184,000
1,699,258
153,000 120
74
180 0.5
4.2 1,820
1,250
3,570
less
650 Main
1000
Proposed
Total
GFA
NFA
Total NFA
for
GFA Foyermix
Unit
Serviced & facilities
Apartments 50%
100.0%
20% 3%
80.8% 50,978
78,000 fs
300,000
531,000
1,648,280
1,332,160
1,699,258 fs 300
600
120 SOHO 147
2.8 7,000
12,390
1,820 78% 1
NFA 650 Main
Total
850
less GFA Foyer & facilities 20%
30% 78%3% 78,000
210,384
1,699,258
153,000
50,978 fsfs 120
180 2.8
4.2
0.0 1,820
3,570
-
(Block
B ock D
D : 18
18 floo
floors)
s 1000
GFA
Total for
NFA Serviced Apartments 50%
100.0% 300,000
1,648,280
531,000 fs no.300
600 7NFA/floor
14 7,000
12,390 78%GFA/floo1

C
Unit
A Serviced 850size
No.
NFA
less ofMain (fs)
units per &floor
Apartments
Foyer facilities % of units
30% 80.8%
3% 14 units Total NFA Total
1,332,160
153,000
50,978 fs of units
180 Avg Units/flloor 4.2 (fs) Eff
3,570

B
No. 850ofMain
less
1000
Total
GFA floors
NFA
for Foyer & facilities
Serviced Apartments 30% 18
50%
100.0% 3% 153,000
50,978 fsfs
300,000
12,000
1,332,160
1,648,280 fsper floor 180
300
1472 4.27
10 3,570 78%
7,000
9,050 11

E D
650 Total
NFA
TotalNo.
Total
1000 of
Proposed NFA
for
GFAno. Serviced
units of per
floors Apartments
floor
Unit mixApartments 100.0%
20%
50%80.8% 14
43 units 531,000
1,332,160
78,000
300,000
15,885
1,699,258 fs fs
fs GFA 600
120
300
per floor (average) Serviced Apt 7 2.814 7 12,390
1,820
7,000 78% 1
GFA
1000 for Serviced 50% 1,648,280
300,000 fs 300 7,000 78%
No. GFA
Total
NFA
No. ofof NFA
units
for per
Serviced
units floor
per&mix floorApartments 100.0% 10
80.8% units 1,648,280
531,000
1,332,160 fs 600 14 12,390 1
850
less Total
No. Main
Proposed
Unit no.
ofsizetowers
NFA of
FoyerUnit
(fs) floors facilities 30%
100.0%
%100.0% 3%14
of units 431 unitsTotal 153,000
15,885
531,000
50,978NFAfsTotal fs
fs GFA 180
no. per
600 offloor
units(average) AvgServiced 4.214 NFA/floor
Apt
Units/flloor 3,570
12,390 78%
(fs) Eff 1
D Total NFA
Total
Retail
NFA
No. of
for
NFA
for
no.
Serviced
Serviced
units
ofofUnit per floor
floors
Apartments
Apartments
80.8%
80.8%
147
1,332,160
14 units1,332,160 531,000
11,603 fsGFA
fsfs 600
per 14 12,390 78%GFA/flo1
1000
GFA Total
Proposed
No. for
Unit
650 no.
ofsizetowers
floors (fs)floors
Serviced
units per
per mix tower
Apartments
floor %50%of
40% units 43141 units
43 Total 15,885
300,000
1,648,280 NFAfsTotal GFAno.300peroffloor
floor (average)
units(average) AvgServiced Apt74 NFA/floor
Units/flloor 7,000 (fs) Eff GFA/flo
units 382,720 589 2,600
Fac
Facilities
es FFloor
oo
64 25

A B C
No. No.ofof
Total
Total
ProposedGFA units
no.
towers ofUnitpermix
floors floor 14
43
3 40,459
15,885 fs fs GFA per floor (average) Serviced Apt
NFA No.
Unit
TotalNo.
650
Total
850 of
size
NFA
of
for towers
floors
no. (fs)
Serviced
ofUnit permix
floors tower
Apartments % of
100.0%
40%units43
80.8% 1 Total
531,000
1,332,160 NFA fs
382,720
15,885
500,480 Total
fs GFA no.
600 of floor
per
589 units(average) Avg Units/flloor 144NFA/floor 12,390 (fs) 78%
2,600
3,400 Eff GFA/flo
15
Proposed
Total
Total NFAno. of
for floors
Retail 65% 43 15,885
26,298 fs fs GFA per floor (average) Serviced Apt
No. Proposed
No.
Unit
No. of of
sizetowers
floors Unit
(fs) per mixtower % of units49 1
431unitsTotal NFA Total no. of units Serviced
Avg Units/flloor Apt NFA/floor (fs) Eff GFA/flo
CNo. No.ofof
650
Office
850
1200
Unit
floors
units
ofsize
towers (fs)perperfloor tower
% of40%
40%
15% units14 382,720
500,480
264,960
Total NFA Total no. 589
589of units
221 Avg Units/flloor 1.544 NFA/floor2,600
3,400
1,800(fs) Eff GFA/flo
Unit
Total
No. of
650 sizetowers
floors
floors (fs) per tower % of 40%units43 11 floor Total NFA Total no.
382,720 589 of units Avg Units/flloor4 NFA/floor 2,600(fs) Eff GFA/flo
850
TotalOffice
CProposed
Total
1200
No. of
2500
650 GFA
no. ofUnit
floors floors
per
mixtower 40%
5% 4343
15%
40% 500,480
269,724
382,720fsfsGFA per
15,885
264,960
184,000 589
74floor (average)
221
589 Serviced Apt0.5 1.544 3,400
1,800
1,250
2,600
BC SOHO No. of floors
650
850 per tower 40% 78% 43 382,720
500,480 589 4 2,600
3,400
No. Office
1200
Total GFA % of15% 264,960
269,724 fs no.221 1.5
0.04NFA/floor1,800
Unit 850ofsize
NFA
2500 towers(fs) units 1
5%
40% Total 210,384
184,000
NFA Total
500,480 74
of units
589 Avg Units/flloor 0.5 1,250
-
(fs)
3,400 Eff GFA/floo
EC Total 850
Carpark
Office
1200 GFARequirement (as per DBKL calculation) 40%
15% 500,480 fsfs
687,795
264,960 589
221 1.54 3,400
1,800
N
N No.
C650 Total
2500
NFA
No. ofofGFA
Office
Total floors
floorsper tower
NFA 5% 78%
100.0%
40% 4318 269,724
184,000
210,384
12,000 fs per 589
1,332,160
382,720 74
floor
1472 0.5
0.0
410 1,250
-
9,050
2,600 78% 1
G
Ground/Bridge
ound B dge
1200 15% 264,960 221 1.5 1,800

iew
C less Office
1200
Total
Serviced
2500 MainGFA apartments/SOHO
Foyer & facilities 15%
5%22093% cps@ @ 1cps 264,960
269,724
20,634
184,000 / 500fs fsfs NFA221 (65%)
74 1.5
0.5 1,800
1,250
850 NFA
No.
Total
No. of NFA
ofGFA floors
units per floor 100.0%
40% 78% 18
10 units1,332,160 210,384
12,000 fs
269,724
500,480 fs per 589 floor
1472 0.0
410 -
9,050
3,400 78% 1
(4.2 2500
Total GFA 5% 4.2 184,000
269,724 fs 74 4.2 0.5 1,250
SOHO
GFA 2500
NFA for SOHO 5% 894
78% cps @@ 184,000
1cps
210,384
667,161 / 500fs fs NFA
fsfs per floor 74
(65%) 0.5
0.0 1,250
-
linkage
nkage
No.
NFAof
Total NFAfloors 100.0% 18 12,000
1,332,160 1472 10 9,050 78% 1

tV
CD1200 Office
Retail
No.
Total of units
no. of per
floors floor 15% 78%
14710 units 210,384
264,960
11,603 fs GFA221
fs per floor (average) 1.5
0.0 1,800 -
NFA NFAfor
Office
No.
Total of NFA SOHO
floors 79.6%
100.0% 78%
378 18 cps @ 210,384
@1,332,160
1cps
531,000
12,000 / 500fs fs per
fsfs NFAfloor(70%)
1472 0.0
10 -
9,050 78% 1
No.
Total
D2500 Retail
Total
Total of
GFA
GFAunits
no.
floors per floor
of floors 5% 147 10183 units1,332,160
269,724
12,000fsfs GFA
40,459
184,000
11,603 74
per floor per floor (average) 0.510 1,250

s
No.
No. of of towers
NFA
floors 100.0% 18 cps 12,000 fs per 1472
floor 9,050 78% 1
Total
Retail
No. of NFA
units per floor 100.0% 57 10 @
units@ 1,332,160
1cps / 500fs NFA 1472
(70%) 10 9,050 78% 1

Be
D NFA Retail
Total
No. ofGFA no. offorfloors 147
78% 11,603
26,298fsfs fs GFA 6 per floor (average)
NFA
towers
floors
units Retail
per
per tower
floor 65%
70 103 units210,384
49 40,459 32 0.0 -
Total
No.
Retail
D Proposed Car
of units Park
Unit per Requirement
mix floor 3,537 10 cps units 40,459 SOHO
Re
Retail
a
Total no. offor floors 147 11,603fsfs fsper
GFA per floor (average)
G
Ground
ound floo
floor No.
DTotal Total
No.
No.
Totalofof
Retail of GFAtowers
NFA
floors
NFA floors
floors Retail
per tower 100.0% 65%
18 3
491 floor 26,298
12,000
1,332,160 fs floor
1472 10 9,050 78% 11
D Unit Retail no. of floors 147 11,603 fs GFA per floor (average)
Total
No.
Total size
of no.
GFA
NFAtowers of
(fs) for floors
Retail % of units 147
65% 3 Total 11,603
40,459
NFA Totalfs GFA no. per
of floor
units (average) Avg Units/flloor NFA/floor (fs) Eff GFA/floo
BNo. No.
Total
SOHO
No. ofof floors
floors
GFA
ofunits
towers perper floortower 4913units
10 floor 26,298 40,459 fs fs
Total
Elevated GFA Carpark
towers 40,459
26,298 fs
DE
650
BTotal
Totaloffloors
No.
Total
Retail
SOHO
Carpark
Totalof
Total no.
NFA
floors
NFA
GFA of
forperRetail
Requirement
for
floorsRetail
tower 20% 65%
(as per DBKL calculation) 65%
147 13 floor 11,603
49 78,000
26,298
687,795 fsfs
fs 120 2.8 1,820
850
No.
Elevated
Totalof
No.
Total
floors
NFA carpark
floors
floors for per
Retail
per
tower
floor
tower plate 168,577
30% 65% 49
491 fsfloor
per floor (@
@ 50%
26,298
153,000 fsGFA per floor (average)
of plinth
180 area) 4.2 3,570
Pod
Podium
um Pa
Parking
k ng
BENo. SOHO
TotalTotal
less
TotalofGFA
Carpark
Serviced GFA
Main
towers
floors Requirement
apartments/SOHO
Foyer & facilities (as perfloorDBKL calculation) 2209
3% cps
31 cps/flr
floor @ @(@ 40,459
687,795
1cps
20,634 fsfs NFA (65%)
/ 500fs
Total
1000
B Total Total cps per
floors elevated
SOHOGFARequirement (as per DBKL calculation) carpark 50% 482 1 floor @
300,000350fs/cps) 300 7 7,000
EB No. Carpark
TotalServiced
less
SOHO
GFA of NFA
Main
floors
for for
SOHO Retail
apartments/SOHO
Foyer
per &
towerfacilities 65%
2209
3%
894
49 cps @ @ 687,795
26,298
20,634
1cps
667,161 / fsfs
500fsfs NFA (65%)
Sub
Sub-Basement
Basemen
Total elevated carpark floors 4.1 floors 531,000
above
above gground
ound (4
4
B
E Total SOHO
Carpark
Total NFA Requirement
GFAapartments/SOHO 100.0%2209
(as per DBKL calculation) 687,795 fs NFA 600(65%) 14 12,390 78% 15
Note:
Note: Aesthetics
Aesthetics and
and Builtform
Builtform in
in progress
progress
E
Serviced
less
Total
E Est. SOHO
Office
GFA
NFA
Carpark
Total Main
floors
for
GFA Foyer
SOHO
Requirement & facilities(as per DBKL calculation) 3%
894
378
1 cps
cps
floor
79.6% cps 667,161 @
@ @
@ 1cps
20,634
1cps
531,000
687,795 fs // 500fs
500fsfs NFA (65%)
(70%)
E No. Total
less total
Carpark
Serviced
of GFA
units
Main carpark
Requirement
apartments/SOHO
per
Foyer spaces
floor
& facilitiesprovided
(as per DBKL calculation)1,996
2209
14
3% cps
units @@ 687,795
1cps
20,634 / 500fsfs NFA (65%)
SOHO
GFA for SOHO 894
37857 cps cps@ @ 1cps
@667,161 // 500fs fs NFA
fs NFA (65%)
(2
2 floo
floors)
s
B SOHO Office
NFA
Retail 79.6% @ 531,000
1cps 500fs (70%)
floo
floors)
s
Serviced
less Main apartments/SOHO
Foyer & facilities 698,6512209
3% 20,634 (65%)
Total
Serviced
less
SOHO
Total
GFA
Office
podium
Main
no. of
for SOHO
SOHOFoyercarpark
apartments/SOHO
floors area
& facilities 3% fscps
2209
894
43
378
cps@ @667,161
1cps
20,634
15,885 / 500fs
fsfs
fsGFA NFA per(65%)
floor (average) Towers
E Total NFA
Retail
Carpark
Total
SOHO
Proposed
GFA for
GFACar
for Requirement
SOHOPark
Unit Requirement
mix (as per DBKL calculation) 79.6%
3,537
89457 cps cps@ @ @ 1cps
1cps // 500fs
531,000
@687,795
667,161 fsfs
500fs fs
NFA
NFA (70%)(70%)
(65%) SOHO
No. SOHO
GFA
Office
NFA offor towersSOHO 894
378
79.6% 1 cps cps@ @@667,161
1cps // 500fs
531,000 500fsfs NFA NFA (70%)(65%)
(70%)
Retail
Total
Serviced
less Main
Proposed
Office
Unit Car
size Park
apartments/SOHO
FoyerUnit
(fs) Requirement
&mix facilities 2209
% of units 3% 57
3,537
378 cps
cps @ @ @@
@1cps1cps
20,634
Total1cps NFA / 500fs fs NFA
fsTotal
/ 500fs no.(65%)
NFA (70%)
of units AvgSOHOUnits/flloor NFA/floor
NFA
Basement
Office for SOHO Carpark 79.6%
378 cps
cps@ @ 531,000
1cps
1cps // 500fs fs NFA NFA (70%) Serv. Apt(fs) Eff GFA/floServ.
Phase
Phase 11
NFA offor SOHO 79.6% @531,000

Site Plan
No. Retail
Total
Proposed floors
Car Park
Unitpermix tower
Requirement 43
3,537 57 cps @ 500fs (70%) SOHO
SOHO
GFA Elevated
Unit
Retail
650
Basement size
for SOHO Carpark
(fs) % of20% 89457cps
units cps@ @ @ 1cps
Total
@667,161
1cps NFA
78,000 / 500fs fs
/ 500fsTotal NFA no.
NFA (65%)
120 of units
(70%) Avg Units/flloor 2.8 NFA/floor 1,820(fs) Eff GFA/flo
Retail Car carpark
Total
Proposed Park
Unit mix
floor plate
Requirement 269,724
3,537 57 fscps per
cps @@floor
1cps assuming
/ 500fs NFA 80%
(70%)of site area SOHO
NFA Elevated
Unit
Elevated
Office
650
850 size
for SOHOcarpark
(fs)
Carpark floor plate % of168,577
20%
30%units
378
79.6% fs
cps per
@ @
3,537 fscps 531,000 floor
Total
1cps NFA(@
78,000fs
153,000 @
/ 500fs50%
Total NFAof
no.plinth
of
(70%)
120 area)
units Avg Units/flloor 2.8NFA/floor (fs) Eff GFA/flo
1,820
C M&E
Total
Proposed
Total
Proposed
Office
Car
room/services
Car
Park
Unit mix
Park
Unit
Requirement
Requirement
mix 134,862
3,537 cps say 50%180 of basement A A floor
Fusion of
SOHO
Exciting
SOHO
4.2
Space
3,570
Unit
Elevated
Total
650 size (fs)
Carpark
cps carpark
per elevatedfloor platecarpark floor % of
20% units
168,577482cps fs @
per
cps/flr Total
floor
(@
@ NFA(@
@
350fs/cps)
78,000 Total
50%NFA no.
of 120 of
plinth units
area) Avg Units/flloor 2.8 NFA/floor1,820(fs) Eff GFA/flo
Retail
850
1000 30%
50% 57 @Total1cps
153,000
300,000 / 500fs (70%)
180
300 4.27 NFA/floor 3,570
7,000
Unit©© T.
Elevated
TotalTotal
Total
850
1000 T. R.
Unit cps
Total
Elevated
Total
650
Elevated
Proposed
Total R.©
size
size
GFA
cps
Car Hamzah
Hamzah
NFA
per
&& Yeang
carpark
elevated per
Park Yeang Sdn.
T. R. Hamzah
Carpark
Unit &Sdn.
(fs)basement
(fs) elevated
Carpark Bhd.
Bhd. Sdn.
Yeang (November
(November
floor plate
carpark
Requirement
mix Bhd. 2022)
2022)
carpark floor %
(2023)
carpark
floors floor
% of
of
20%
units
771
units
168,577
30%
50%
100.0%3,537 4.1 fs
482
2.0 cps
cps/flr
cps/flr
floors
(@
perTotal
@
269,724
floor
(@
153,000
NFA
350fs/cps)
NFA
@78,000
300,000
531,000
(@
@ 50%
350fs/cps)
Total no.
fsTotalofno. 120
of units
of units
plinth
180
300
600
Avg Units/flloor
area) 1 Lap Pool Avg Units/flloor
SOHO
2.8 NFA/floor
4.2
147
1,820
3,570
7,000
12,390
(fs) Eff GFA/flo
(fs) Eff GFA/flo
1,820 78% 1

D
650
Total
Elevated basement carpark carpark
floor carpark floors
plate 20%
168,577 floor
fs per210,384 78,000
floor (@
@ fs 50% of plinth 120 2.8
NFA Elevated
650
Total
850
Total cps
elevated
Carpark
per elevated
carpark floors floor 20%
30% 78%
482
4.1 cps/flr
floors (@
@ 78,000
350fs/cps)
153,000 120 area)2 Jacuzzi Lounges
180 2.8
4.2 1,820
3,570
1000
Est.
Elevatedtotal carpark spaces
floor plateprovided 50% 1,996
168,577 cps
fs per 300,000
floor (@
@ Total 50% no. of 300
plinth area) 7NFA/floor 7,000

42 43
Unit
Est.Total
No.
850 size
of
Elevated
Total totalNFA
cps (fs)
units carpark
carpark
per per floor
floor
spaces
elevated plate
provided
carpark floor 100.0%
% of units
30%
168,577
1,541 48214 cps fs Total
units
per
cps/flr 531,000
floor
(@
@ NFA
153,000 (@
@
350fs/cps) 50% of 600
of units
180
plinth area) Avg Units/flloor
Facilities 14
4.2 12,390
(fs) Eff
3,570 78%GFA/floo1
No. 850
1000
Total
Est. oftotal
floors
elevated carpark carpark
spaces floors
provided 30%
50% 18
4.1 floors
1,996 cps 153,000
300,000
12,000 fs per floor 180
300 3 Jumping JetsTowers 4.2
and Splash147Pool 12,390 3,570
7,000 78%
Total
Total
Elevated
650 No.
Total
1000
Total of podium
NFA
cps
units
no.
basement per
Carpark
of carpark
elevated
per
floors
area floor area
carpark floor 698,651
100.0%
20%
50%
674,309 48214
43 fsfs
cps/flr531,000
units (@
@15,885
78,000
300,000350fs/cps) fs GFA 600
120
300
per floor (average) 2.8 7 1,820
7,000 1

© T. R. Hamzah & Yeang Sdn Bhd, 2023 © T. R. Hamzah & Yeang Sdn Bhd, 2023
Totaltotal
1000 cps
elevated per elevated
carpark carpark
floors floor 50% 482
4.1 cps cps/flr
floors (@
@ 350fs/cps) 300
300,000 Podium CP 147 7,000 78%
Total
Est.
Total
Elevated
850 No.
Total NFA
ofpodium carpark
carpark
units
elevated carpark
per spaces
floor
floor
carpark area
plate provided
floors 100.0% 1,996
698,651
168,577
30% 14 fsperAfloor
431fsunits
4.1 floors A Fusion
531,000
(@
@ 50% ofofExciting
600 area)
plinth Space 4 Green Cabanas Towers 12,390 1
Total
No.
Est. of
Total
Total
no.
towers
NFA
elevated
total
NFA
of floors
carpark carpark
spaces floors
provided 100.0%
100.0% 1,9964.1 floors153,000
cps 15,885
531,000 fs GFA 180 per floor (average)
600 (4.1 flrs) 4.214 3,570
12,390 78% 1
D TotalRetail
Total
No.
Basement
Total
Est. of ofpodium
cps
no.
totalunits
per carpark
per
elevated
of Carpark
floors
carpark floor
spaces area
carpark floor
provided 698,651
482
1,99643 units1(@
fs
14cps/flr
cps @531,000
Lap Poolfs GFA 600
350fs/cps)
15,885 5 Gallery
per floor (average) Towers 14 Serv. 12,390
Apt 78% Serv 1
5 1000 No.
Total
Est.
Totalof totaltowers
floors
built-up
units
podium per
areafloor
per
carpark carpark tower
(GFA+CP+M&E)
spaces areaprovided
50%1,996
3,112,677
698,651 43 units300,000
141 fscps
fs
300 Grd
Towers(1 flr) 7 7,000
TotalNo.
Total
Total
Basement
BasementGFA units
no.
elevated per
ofcarpark
floors
Carpark floor
carpark floor floors
plate 4.1
269,724 14
43 units
floors
fs per 40,459
15,885 fs
2 floor
Jacuzzi Lounges
fs GFA per80%
assuming 6 Children
floorof(average)
site area Playground Serv. Apt Serv
No.
TotalTotal of
NFA towers
podium carpark area 698,651
100.0% 1 Towers
No.
Totalof
Total
Tower
Total
Total NFA
floors
no.
height
podium
no. of
for
per tower
of floors
(Total
carpark
floors
Retail
floors)
area 698,651
65%
55 43 fs 3531,000
43 floors 15,885 fs GFA600
15,885
Jumping
26,298 fs fs
Jets GFA and
per floor (average)
per floor
Splash (average)
7
Pool Maze Garden Towers (214flr) Serv.
Basement 12,390 78% 15
Est.Basement
No.
Basement
M&E
No. of
of towers
room/services
total carpark
floors Carpark
carpark spaces
perfloor floor plate
tower provided 269,724
134,862
1,996 1
431cps fs per floor assuming
say 50% of80% of site area
basement floor Apt Serv
CNo. Office
No. of
Basementofunits
towers per
Carpark 14 units Schematic
Serv. AptDiagram Serv
Basement
Total
No.
M&E towers
floors
of floors carpark
room/services per tower floor plate 269,724
134,862 11 floor
43 fs per4 floor
fs Green Cabanas assuming
say 50% of 80% basement 8 Gymnasium
of site area
floor
 alternative aesthetic options generating marketing themes
ideas & options
example of rooftop for a luxury apartment project:
ZONE 1: 4 POOLS 1. “Caribbean, Calypso”
Sun Deck
Chairs

Shower

Palm Trees

3.5m

Drums
Sunbeds &
Umbrellas tropical & fun

2.“Copacabana, Ipanema”
Umbrellas
OPTION 1 OPTION 2 OPTION 3
“double helix” “jenga” “interlocking J”
A

27m
Sunbed &
Surfboards Beach blanket

-0.80
calm & relaxing
-1.20 -1.20
B -0.10 C Hammock

3.“Santa Monica, California”

Exercise Area
Staircase access to L37
mezzanine floor (changing
room & toilet)

OPTION 4 OPTION 5 OPTION 6

“lattice” “swirl” “cubic”
selected by Client • Chengdu, China Sun Deck Chair
Roller skates lively & energetic
44 © T. R. Hamzah & Yeang Sdn Bhd, 2023 © T. R. Hamzah & Yeang Sdn Bhd, 2023 45
 fixing the planet for future generation

what
...We are the only architect firm worldwide
that delivers ECOLOGICALLY-
AUTHENTIC SIGNATURE 'SUPER
GREEN' ARCHITECTURE AND
MASTERPLANS for environmentally-aware
INVESTORS, who want SIGNATURE
DESIGNS that are aesthetically unique,

are the
identifiably world class, pleasurable to
use, SUPER GREEN (beyond rating
systems), innovative & DELIVERED
PROFESSIONALLY

values?
on time, on budget
that are durable and built with high quality...

46 © T. R. Hamzah & Yeang Sdn Bhd, 2023 © T. R. Hamzah & Yeang Sdn Bhd, 2023 47
 creating high-value products value from our award winning experiences
..over 70 awards in 25 years..
Well-designed, refined, elegant 2022 Australian Institute of Architect - 2022 Leadership in Sustainability Prize
2021 The Edge Malaysia-PAM Green Excellence Award (Honorary Mention)
and exquisitely beautiful 2021
- Putrajaya Suasana (2C5)
PAM Gold Medal Award 2020: Commercial (High Rise) Category
- Putrajaya Suasana (2C5)
2020 ASA Gold Medal
2020 Global Forum on Human Settlements (supported by UN Environment Sustainable
Development) Planning and Design for Putrajaya Suasana (2C5)
Design that gives the 2020 Global Forum on Human Settlements (supported by UN Environment Sustainable
Development) Outstanding Contribution
highest level of pleasure 2020
2018
Malaysia Green Building Council Best Research
Malaysia Green Building Council Best Commercial Building Putrajaya Suasana (2C5)
2017 Cityscape Award for Putrajaya Suasana 2C5
2016 Liang Sicheng Architecture Prize, China
2016 FIABCI World Prix d’ Excellence Awards: Solaris (Fusionopolis)
Exclusiveness of product that many 2016
2015
PAM Award Commendation: Single Residential - R-House
40th Most Famous Architects of the 21st Century “..you deserve the award..”

others cannot have or enjoy

Receipt of Merdeka Award (2011)
2015 The Malaysian Construction Industry Excellence Awards: Prominent Player from Prime Minister (Malaysia)
2015 BCA-SGBC Green Building Individual Awards: Green Architect Lifetime

2014 FuturARC Green Leadership Award: Solaris (Fusionopolis)

2014 World Alliance of Sustainable Cities Design: Design Master
Product possession by purchasers 2014
2014
AIA IR Design Awards, Hong Kong: Solaris, Fusionopolis
NPark Leaf Certificate Awards: Solaris, Fusionopolis
as reward of their personal success 2013
2013
MGBC Excellence & Leadership in Sustainability Award
ARCASIA Award: Honorary Mention, Industrial Building - DIGI
2013 Universiti Malaya - Honorary Doctorate in Architecture
2012 Green Building Index, Malaysia - Plaza VADS (Annex Block)
2012 RAIA International Architecture Award: Finalist - Solaris (Fusionopolis)
Possession of well-designed exclusive 2012
2012
Green Building Index, Malaysia: Gold - DiGi
Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat: Finalist
product as proof of financial standing 2011
2011
RIBA International Award: Solaris, Fusionopolis
Regional Holcim Award for Sustainable Construction: Putrajaya Lot 2C5
2011 WACA Gold Medal Award: Solaris (Fusionopolis)
2011 LEEDS Platinum status on the pre-certification for Spire Edge, India
2011 PAM Gold Medal Award: Solaris (Fusionopolis)
2011 PAM Award Commendation: Ganendra Art House
Product possession as by 2011 Fast Company, March Issue: TOP 10 Most Innovative Architect Firm
Architectural Society of China Liang Sicheng Award 2010 Green Good Design Awards - Solaris (Fusionopolis)
owner’s recognition of status 2016 received from Minister of Construction, China 2010 MATRADE Export Excellence Award: Services

2009 CNBC Asia Pacific Property Award: Spire Edge, Manesar, India
2009 BCA Green Mark Platinum Award: Solaris & Singapore National Library
2009 CNBC Asia Pacific Property Award: Best Residential Apartment - TTDI Plaza
Accompanying privileges and service 2008
2007
MARTRADE Export Excellence Award: Winning Entry - Solaris (Fusionopolis)
ASEAN Energy Efficient Building Awards: 1st prize - ‘New & Existing’ Buildings
created for the designed product 2007
2006
BCA Singapore Silver Award: Universal Design
Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) Award
2006 SIA Facade Design Excellence Silver Award: Singapore National Library
2006 MCIEA (Malaysian Construction Industry Award)
2005 BCA Singapore Green Mark Platinum Award: Green and Sustainable Building
Functional rationale for 2005
2001
World Association of Chinese Architects (WACA): Gold Medal Award
Hunter Douglas Competition (Open), Malaysia: Winning Entry
ownership of designed product 2000
2000
Beijing World Science & Trade Centre Competition (Invited): Winning Entry
Huannan Masterplan Competition for Hopsons Award, China: Winning Entry
1996 RAIA International Architecture Award: Menara Mesiniaga Putrajaya Suasana (2C5) is used as the backdrop
1996 Aga Khan Award for Architecture, Switzerland: Menara Mesiniaga for Honda’s advertisement for their latest model.
48 © T. R. Hamzah & Yeang Sdn Bhd, 2023 © T. R. Hamzah & Yeang Sdn Bhd, 2023 49
 creating design

ds
& innovations

Our vision:
“to be architect-of-choice to deliver hypergreen,
signature and innovative architecture and masterplans.”
- © T. R. Hamzah & Yeang Sdn. Bhd. (2023)-

Our Offices
© Malaysia (Flagship Office): UK: China:
T. R. Hamzah & Yeang Sdn. Bhd. Ken Yeang Design International Ltd. North Hamzah Yeang Architectural
8, Jalan 1, Taman Sri Ukay 4A Avery Row, London, W1K 4AL Engineering Design Co. Ltd.
68000 Ampang, Selangor, Malaysia [ t ] 03-4257 1966/ 1948 (8 Branches in China)
[t] 03-4257 1966/ 1948 [ e ] [email protected] Guide International Centre B-10F,
[f] 03-4256 1005 Nanbine Road 27 Beijing, 10055, China
[e] [email protected] [ t ] 86 10 6342 7165
[w] www.trhamzahyeang.com [ e ] [email protected]
(Contact: Y. Z. Song - CEO)
Copyright © 2023 by T. R. Hamzah & Yeang Sdn. Bhd.
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including photocopying, recording, or other electronic or mechanical methods, without the prior written permission of the publisher,
except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical reviews and certain other noncommercial uses permitted by copyright law. For permission requests, write to the publisher, addressed “Attention: Permissions Coordinator,” at the address below.