Tax Hotline

May 14, 2024

ITAT HOLDS THAT REDEMPTION PREMIUM RECEIVED ON NON-

CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURES TAXABLE AS INTEREST INCOME (NOT
CAPITAL GAINS)

The Mumbai ITAT holds that premium received by the taxpayer on redemption of
debentures is interest income and not capital gains

Redemption of debentures is realization of debt and not extinguishment of rights.

Hence, such redemption cannot be a transfer for the purposes of Income-tax
Act,1961

Capital gains can only arise on such redemption when debentures are sold in open
market

BACKGROUND

In a recent ruling1 the Mumbai bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai
(“ITAT”) held that premium received by the Taxpayer2 on redemption of debentures is
interest income. In this context, it was held that redemption of debentures is nothing but
repayment of debt and the same cannot fall under the category of extinguishment as
interpreted by various courts in the case of equity/preference shares.

FACTS OF THE CASE

During financial year 2004/2005, two Indian companies, namely Bhishma Realty Limited
(“BRL”) and Capricorn Realty Limited (“CRL”) (hereinafter referred to as “Indian
Companies”) issued redeemable non-convertible debentures (“NCDs”) on a private
placement basis to nationalized banks. As per the terms and conditions, two types of
NCDs i.e., NCD -1 for the creditors holding first charge and NCD-2 for the creditors
holding second charge were issued. Further, the NCDs were to be redeemed within a
period of 5 years along with redemption premium to yield an IRR. The Indian Companies
were not required to pay interest either quarterly, half yearly or annually during the tenure
of the NCDs. During the year 2006, the banks started pressurizing the directors of the
companies for payment of NCDs. Hence, the Taxpayer (being one of the directors in CRL)
purchased the NCDs from the banks. Premium was payable on the redemption of NCDs
on maturity.

During the year 2009, the Indian Companies redeemed the NCDs acquired by the
Taxpayer. The maturity proceeds were received by the Taxpayer and the Taxpayer offered
the gain of Rs. 276.50 lakhs as long term capital gains (“LTCG”). The Taxpayer invested
the maturity proceeds in purchase of a flat under construction. Accordingly, an exemption
under section 54F and 54EC of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (“ITA”) was claimed in his return
of income. The Assessing officer (“AO”) observed that the Taxpayer did not get the
possession of the flat within the prescribed period of three years. Hence, the AO took the
view that the Taxpayer has not complied with the conditions prescribed under section 54F
and accordingly rejected the claim for deduction. In the appellate proceedings, the
Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) (“CIT(A)”) held that the redemption of NCDs would
not give rise to LTCG and held that the difference between the maturity proceeds upon
redemption of NCDs and cost should be considered as ‘interest income’ in hands of the
Taxpayer. Further, since the Taxpayer did not earn any LTCG, the question of allowing
deduction was not considered in the appellate proceedings.

DECISION OF THE ITAT

The ITAT while considering and concluding on the question - whether the gains arising to
Taxpayer on redemption of NCDs is in the nature of capital gains or is in the nature of
interest income observed the following.

Meaning of debentures: As per section 2(30) of the Companies Act, 2013, debenture
includes debenture stock, bonds, or any other instrument of a company evidencing a
debt, whether constituting a charge on the assets of the company or not. Hence,
even though the debentures would fall under the definition of securities, yet they are
essentially debt instruments evidencing a debt.

Applicability of CBDT Circular No. 002 of 2002 (“Circular”): The revenue argued that
the Circular issued by Central Board of Direct taxes (“CBDT”) clarifying the tax
treatment of gains realized on redemption of deep discount bonds (“DDB”) should be
considered. The Circular inter-alia provided that upon redemption of DDB on maturity,
the difference between the redemption price and the value as on the last valuation
date immediately preceding the maturity date will be taxed as interest income in the
case of investors, or business income in the case of traders. The ITAT held that both
the amount of discount on DDBs and the premium amount, in effect, are “interest
amounts”.

Section 50AA of the ITA not applicable: The Taxpayer relied on the recently
introduced section 50AA of the ITA which provides that the gains arising on transfer,
redemption or maturity of market linked debentures (“MLDs”) shall be deemed to be
 capital gains arising on transfer of short-term capital asset. The Taxpayer argued that
ITA itself considered debenture as ‘capital assets’. In this context, the ITAT observed
that section 50AA is applicable only to MLDs wherein interest rate payable on them is
not determined at time of issuance. The return on MLDs is determined on the basis
of performance of the underlying market index or instrument. NCDs acquired by the
Taxpayer are materially different from MLDs. The ITAT therefore held that the legal
fiction introduced in section 50AA to deal with taxation of MLDs cannot be applied to
the facts of the instant case.
Shares vs Debentures: The Taxpayer while relying on multiple case laws3 contended
that redemption of preference shares or reduction of face value of shares results in
extinguishment of rights held by a shareholder and hence amount paid to the
shareholder is exigible to capital gains tax. The ITAT observed that the ratio of
decisions rendered in the case of equity/preference shares cannot be applied to debt
instruments. There is no dispute that they are two different types of instruments
having different types of rights and liabilities. A shareholder is considered to be one of
the owners of the company with certain rights. On the contrary, a debenture holder is
a financial creditor to the company and is entitled to receive only interest as per
agreed terms. Debenture holders do not have any right over the surplus arising on
liquidation of company. Hence, shares and debentures stand on different footing.

Possibility of Incidence of capital gains in case of debentures: The ITAT observed that
the holder of the debenture is only entitled to receive interest from it and the said
interest can be taxable under the head income from other sources or business
income. Similarly, in the case of shares, the shareholder gets dividend income and
the same is taxable as above. The ITAT held that the possibility of capital gains in
case of NCDs may only arise if their market value is difference from their face value
and this kind of variation may arise only when they are sold in open market (i.e., to a
third party). The market value of the debentures would depend upon the fluctuation in
the prevailing general interest rates. Hence, if market value of debentures increases,
the gain realized by the person is assessable as capital gains.

While linking the above logic to the facts of the instant case, the ITAT observed that
NCDs under consideration are privately placed debentures and they are not listed on
the stock exchange. Further, the NCDs are not sold in the open market, and they
have only been surrendered for redemption. Thus, it is only a case of realization of
money advanced by a creditor and the question of capital gains will not arise when
the debentures are redeemed by the issuing companies.

NDA ANALYSIS
Taxability of premium on the redemption of NCDs is a contentious issue. Typically, interest
payable during the tenure of debt instruments represents a commercial rate of return and
redemption premium is paid towards the capital risk being borne by the investor. Courts
have delved upon this in two contexts – (i) allowability of redemption premium as expense
to the issuer company and (ii) characterization and taxability of redemption premium
received by the investor. The Supreme Court of India has held that the character of
payment in relation to the payer can be different from the character of that payment in
hands of recipient.4 In the instant case, the ITAT was dealing the issue of characterization
and taxability of redemption premium in hands of the Taxpayer.

The ITAT has come to the conclusion that redemption premium is taxable as interest
considering the terms on which the NCDs were issued. The ITAT also noted that there
were no periodic interest payments being made to the Taxpayer and the Taxpayer was
getting the premium amount upon maturity of the NCDs. Importantly, the decision by the
ITAT does not consider the definition of interest under the ITA. As per section 2(28A) of
ITA, “interest” means interest payable in any manner in respect of any moneys borrowed
or debt incurred (including a deposit, claim or other similar right or obligation) and includes
any service fee or charge in respect of moneys borrowed or debt incurred or in respect of
any credit facility which has not been utilized”. On the plain reading of the aforesaid
definition, it is observed that ‘interest’ under section 2(28A) does not specifically cover
redemption premium. While in this case, the Taxpayer was an Indian resident, in case of
non-resident taxpayer, interplay of definition of ‘interest’ in ITA and relevant tax treaty will
also be important to examine. Several Indian tax treaties specifically includes redemption
premium in its ambit.

Interestingly, the ITAT has also laid down the scenario when income from debt instruments
may be considered as capital gains. The ITAT has emphasized existence of ‘transfer’ is a
pre-requisite for characterization of proceeds as capital gains. Section 2(47) of the ITA
defines “transfer” to inter-alia include, “….the sale, exchange or relinquishment of the
asset; or…..the extinguishment of any rights therein……”. While the ITAT has distinguished
the cases relied by the Taxpayer on the ground that the cases were in relation to
redemption of preference shares or reduction of equity capital, the ITAT has not examined
why redemption of debenture cannot be considered as extinguishment of rights.

Taxation of debt instruments continues to be controversial with specific amendments being

made to ITA in relation to certain debt instruments like MLDs. Determination of tax
implication in hands of the borrower and investor is a fact specific exercise and should be
done considering the nature and terms of the debt instruments.

Avani Maheshwari and Ipsita Agarwalla

You can direct your queries or comments to the authors.

1Khushaal C. Thackersey vs ACIT, I.T.A. No. 3679/Mum/2015 (A.Y. 2010-11)

2Khushaal C. Thackersey

3Anarkali Sarabhai vs. CIT (1997) (90 Taxman 509) (SC), Kartikeya V Sarabhai vs CIT
(1997) (95 Taxman 164) (SC), Sath Gwaldas Mathuradas Mohata Trust vs. CIT (1987) (33
Taxman 328) (Bom).

4M/S Madras Industrial Investment Corporation Ltd. vs CIT [1997] 225 ITR 802 (SC)
DISCLAIMER
The contents of this hotline should not be construed as legal opinion. View detailed
disclaimer.

This Hotline provides general information existing at the time of preparation. The Hotline is intended as a news update and
Nishith Desai Associates neither assumes nor accepts any responsibility for any loss arising to any person acting or refraining
from acting as a result of any material contained in this Hotline. It is recommended that professional advice be taken based on
the specific facts and circumstances. This Hotline does not substitute the need to refer to the original pronouncements.

This is not a Spam mail. You have received this mail because you have either requested for it or someone must have
suggested your name. Since India has no anti-spamming law, we refer to the US directive, which states that a mail cannot be
considered Spam if it contains the sender's contact information, which this mail does. In case this mail doesn't concern you,
please unsubscribe from mailing list.

NDA Introduction Research Papers

Service of Foreign Judicial and Extrajudicial

Documents
March 2024

Opportunities in GIFT City

March 2024

Compendium of Research Papers

March 2024

Want to work with us?

Proud Moments

Chambers and Partners Asia Pacific 2024: Top Tier for Tax,
TMT, Employment, Life Sciences, Dispute Resolution, FinTech
Legal

Legal 500 Asia Pacific 2024: Top Tier for Tax, TMT, Labour
& Employment, Life Sciences & Healthcare, Dispute
Resolution

Benchmark Litigation Asia Pacific 2023: Top Tier for Tax,

We aspire to build the next generation of socially-
conscious lawyers who strive to make the world a Labour & Employment, International Arbitration
better place.
AsiaLaw Asia-Pacific 2023: Top Tier for Tax, TMT, Investment

At NDA, there is always room for the right people! A Funds, Private Equity, Labour and Employment, Dispute
platform for self-driven intrapreneurs solving complex Resolution, Regulatory, Pharma
problems through research, academics, thought leadership
IFLR1000 2024: Top Tier for M&A and Private Equity
and innovation, we are a community of non-hierarchical,
non-siloed professionals doing extraordinary work for the
world’s best clients. FT Innovative Lawyers Asia Pacific 2019 Awards: NDA
ranked 2nd in the Most Innovative Law Firm category (Asia-

We welcome the industry’s best talent - inspired, Pacific Headquartered)

competent, proactive and research minded- with credentials
in Corporate Law (in particular M&A/PE Fund Formation), RSG-Financial Times: India’s Most Innovative Law Firm 2019,

International Tax , TMT and cross-border dispute 2017, 2016, 2015, 2014
resolution.

Write to [email protected]
To learn more about us Click here.
NDA Hotline

Click here to view Hotline archives.

Nishith TV

Mobile App

Click here for

March 09, 2024
Apple IOS
Sprinting to the Future of Law
Android

Nishith Desai Associates

93-B, Mittal Court, Nariman Point
Mumbai 400021, India

[email protected]
www.nishithdesai.com

© 2024 Nishith Desai Associates. All Rights Reserved.