Insisi 1
Insisi 1
Insisi 1
1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Address for correspondence and reprint requests Robert Strauss,
Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina M.D., University of North Carolina, Campus Box 7516, Chapel Hill, NC
2 UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North 27599 (e-mail: [email protected]).
Carolina
Am J Perinatol 2012;29:301–306.
Abstract We examined the relationship between type of skin incision at time of cesarean delivery
and postoperative wound complications in the obese parturient. Women with a body
Providers in women’s health care are finding that the obesity among nulliparous women found a 30% cesarean rate among
epidemic is reaching their patients at alarmingly high rates. obese women, compared with 16% of normal controls. They
A large cohort study found that 29% of women aged 20 to 39 also found a direct relationship between body mass index
were obese.1 In a population-based study of obesity trends in (BMI) and cesarean delivery.6
the United States from 1994 to 2003, prepregnancy obesity Obesity also increases the risk of wound complications
increased nearly 70%.2 after cesarean delivery. In a review of over 142,404 pregnan-
Obesity increases the risk of gestational diabetes, macro- cies, investigators found an increased risk of wound infection
somia, cephalopelvic disproportion, failed induction, failed (odds ratio ¼ 1.6) among obese versus nonobese patients.7
vaginal birth after cesarean, and thus increases the risk of Wound complications are quite disruptive to new mothers,
cesarean delivery.3–5 A large retrospective cohort study often requiring trips back to the operating room,
cumbersome wound vacuum devices, and multiple doctor number of incision type, with 80% power and a two-tailed α of
visits and dressing changes. Such complications also marked- 0.05.12
ly increase medical costs.8 SAS 9.2 (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC) was used for all
Previous studies of risk factors for wound complications statistical analysis. Univariable and multivariable statistics
have identified several potential variables, many of which are were calculated. Nominal variables were assessed by χ2 or
outside a physician’s control, such as need for intrapartum Fisher exact test as appropriate. Continuous variables were
cesarean section, maternal BMI, and endomyometritis. One assessed by Student t test or Wilcoxon rank test as appropri-
potentially modifiable risk factor is type of skin incision. ate. Stepwise logistic regression analysis was used to create a
Surgeons who choose a vertical skin incision may experi- final model of risk factors for wound separation. Variables
ence less blood loss and shorter operative times and avoid the that were found to be significant (p < 0.2) were included in
warm moist skin under a maternal pannus. Surgeons who our final analysis. We did not include exposures that occurred
choose a transverse skin incision may have less subcutaneous after the exposure of interest (type of skin incision) such as
tissue dissection, more secure closure, and better tissue estimated blood loss, uterine incision, use of drains, or
oxygenation postoperatively as these patients may have subcutaneous closure. It is standard practice at our institution
less postoperative pain and presumably earlier ambula- to use 2 g of intravenous cefazolin prior to skin incision for all
tion.9,10 No prospective trials have examined type of skin cesarean deliveries. All vertical skin incisions were closed
incision in relation to wound complications. Two retrospec- with staples, and thus, we were not able to control for type of
tive studies have found conflicting results.11,12 Given these skin closure in our model of risk. We also included the two
inconclusive data, we sought to determine if the type of skin exposures of indication for cesarean and tobacco in our final
Characteristics Vertical Skin Incision (n ¼ 25) Transverse Skin Incision (n ¼ 213) p Value
Age 29.4 5.2 29.9 6.0 0.72
Ethnicity 0.20
White 10 (40) 124 (58)
Black 13 (52) 77 (36)
Other 2 (8) 13 (6)
Insurance 0.63
Medicaid 8 (32) 70 (33)
Private 13 (52) 122 (57)
Uninsured 4 (16) 21 (10)
Diabetes 0.004
None 12 (48) 164 (77)
Gestational 5 (20) 25 (12)
Pregestational 8 (32) 23 (11)
Tobacco use 8 (32) 44 (21) 0.19
Maternal BMI 43 (36–51) 36 (32–40) <0.01
Prior abdominal surgery 0.22
Data are presented as mean standard deviation, median (interquartile range), or n (%). BMI, body mass index.
relationship between BMI and wound separation was not The other study by Wall et al9 included a larger cohort of
linear, and this was accounted for in our final model. patients (n ¼ 239) but the researchers followed the patients
for wound complications only until postoperative day 4 or 5,
when they were discharged from the hospital. Wall et al9
Discussion
found that vertical skin incisions were associated with higher
In a study of 238 obese women undergoing cesarean delivery, rates of wound complications (odds ratio ¼ 12.4; p < 0.001).
we found a higher rate of wound separation among women The strengths of our study include that both inpatient and
with vertical skin incision, but this difference was not sta- outpatient wound complications were identified. Previous
tistically significant. This may be due to increased tension on studies failed to identify outpatient wound separations,
the wound, increased subcutaneous tissue, decreased post- which accounted for more than half of our complications.
operative ambulation, and less tissue perfusion. In addition, Most of the wound complications in our study occurred 1 to
the risk of wound separation increased as patient BMI 2 weeks after discharge. Finally, we were able to include a
increased. broader range of potentially confounding factors than previ-
Our findings extend earlier work on the association be- ous studies.
tween type of skin incision and wound separation. Houston Our findings must be interpreted in the context of the
and Raynor8 compared wound complications in morbidly study design. This is a secondary analysis of an observational
obese patients in a retrospective case control study. Patients cohort study, and therefore, unmeasured factors associated
were eligible for enrollment if their body weight was greater with risk of wound separation may have affected the sur-
than 150% of ideal body weight. They had only 15 patients in geon’s decision to use a vertical or transverse skin incision.
their supraumbilical group and only 54 in the Pfannenstiel Moreover, our ascertainment of wound separation may be
group .They found no difference in wound complications incomplete, because we were limited to searching outpatient
between the two types of incisions. records at our own institution, and patients who did not
Data are presented as mean standard deviation, median (interquartile range), or n (%). BMI, body mass index.
return for a postpartum visit or wound complication could rate in our study, 438 patients would be needed in a prospec-
have been missed. Postoperative techniques such as timing of tive trial to show any difference in wound separation based on
staple removal and techniques of keeping the incision dry type of skin incision.
underneath a maternal pannus were not standardized in our To fully answer the question of optimal skin incision in the
patient population. In addition, our study is based on a cohort obese parturient, a multicenter randomized control trial is
of women with singleton pregnancies who received prenatal needed. Including patients with extremely high BMIs would
care prior to 20 weeks and agreed to participate in a longitu- be important to adequately examine wound complications in
dinal research study. Our results, therefore, may not be this subgroup, particularly because our study suggests that
generalizable to populations that present later to prenatal the incidence levels off after a certain BMI. A prospective
care. Last, our study was underpowered due to the low study could address postoperative incision hygiene or tech-
incidence of vertical skin incisions and wound separations. niques that could keep the incision dry beneath a mater-
In fact, we had only 10% power to detect a difference in wound nal pannus. Last, general surgery literature has suggested
separation between the types of skin incisions, leaving our that obese patients have lower tissue penetration of cepha-
study vulnerable to a type 2 error. Based on the complication losporins, perhaps leading to increased risk of wound
Table 3 Final Regression Model of Type of Skin Incision and Odds of Wound Separation
complications.13 Further investigation of dosing of antibiotics 4 Hibbard JU, Gilbert S, Landon MB, et al; National Institute of Child
for wound prophylaxis in the obese patient is needed in the Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units
obstetrics population. Network. Trial of labor or repeat cesarean delivery in women with
morbid obesity and previous cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol
In conclusion, we found that vertical skin incisions are
2006;108;125–133
associated with increased odds of postoperative wound sep- 5 Cedergren MI. Maternal morbid obesity and the risk of adverse
aration, although this difference did not reach statistical pregnancy outcome. Obstet Gynecol 2004;103;219–224
significance. Although many variables factor into a surgeon’s 6 Bhattacharya S, Campbell DM, Liston WA, Bhattacharya S. Effect
decision on what type of skin incision to perform, the results of body mass index on pregnancy outcomes in nulliparous
women delivering singleton babies. BMC Public Health 2007
of our study do not support the use of vertical skin incisions to
7;168
reduce wound complications among obese women at the
7 Robinson HE, O’Connell CM, Joseph KS, McLeod NL. Maternal
time of cesarean delivery. outcomes in pregnancies complicated by obesity. Obstet Gynecol
2005;106;1357–1364
8 Olsen MA, Butler AM, Willers DM, Gross GA, Hamilton BH, Fraser
Acknowledgments VJ. Attributable costs of surgical site infection and endometritis
after low transverse cesarean delivery. Infect Control Hosp Epi-
Supported by National Institute of Child Health and
demiol 2010;31;276–282
Human Development, National Institutes of Health grant 9 Grantcharov TP, Rosenberg J. Vertical compared with transverse
numbers HD28684A and HD37584. incisions in abdominal surgery. Eur J Surg 2001;167;260–267
10 Brown SR, Goodfellow PB. Transverse verses midline incisions for
abdominal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005;(4):