Concurrent Hashmap
Concurrent Hashmap
Java Collections provides various data structures for working with key-value pairs.
The commonly used ones are -
A synchronized map is a map that can be safely accessed by multiple threads without
causing concurrency issues. On the other hand, a Hash Map is not synchronized which
means when we implement it in a multi-threading environment, multiple threads can
access and modify it at the same time without any coordination. This can lead to data
inconsistency and unexpected behavior of elements. It may also affect the results of
an operation.
Therefore, we need to synchronize the access to the elements of Hash Map using
‘synchronizedMap()’. This method creates a wrapper around the original HashMap and
locks it whenever a thread tries to access or modify it.
Collections.synchronizedMap(instanceOfHashMap);
import java.util.*;
public class Maps {
public static void main(String[] args) {
HashMap<String, Integer> cart = new HashMap<>();
// Adding elements in the cart map
cart.put("Butter", 5);
cart.put("Milk", 10);
cart.put("Rice", 20);
cart.put("Bread", 2);
cart.put("Peanut", 2);
// printing synchronized map from HashMap
Map mapSynched = Collections.synchronizedMap(cart);
System.out.println("Synchronized Map from HashMap: " + mapSynched);
}
}
While both Hashtable and Concurrent Hashmap collections offer the advantage of thread
safety, their underlying architectures and capabilities significantly differ. Whether
we’re building a legacy system or working on modern, microservices-based cloud
applications, understanding these nuances is critical for making the right choice.
Let's see the differences between Hashtable and ConcurrentHashMap, delving into their
performance metrics, synchronization features, and various other aspects to help us
make an informed decision.
1. Hashtable Hashtable is one of the oldest collection classes in Java and has been
present since JDK 1.0. It provides key-value storage and retrieval APIs:
The primary selling point of Hashtable is thread safety, which is achieved through
method-level synchronization.
Methods like put(), putIfAbsent(), get(), and remove() are synchronized. Only one
thread can execute any of these methods at a given time on a Hashtable instance,
ensuring data consistency.
Both Hashtable and ConcurrentHashMap implement the Map interface, which accounts for
the similarity in method signatures:
ConcurrentHashMap, on the other hand, provides thread safety with a higher level of
concurrency. It allows multiple threads to read and perform limited writes
simultaneously without locking the entire data structure. This is especially useful in
applications that have more read operations than write operations.
Performance Comparison Hashtable locks the entire table during a write operation,
thereby preventing other reads or writes. This could be a bottleneck in a high-
concurrency environment.
ConcurrentHashMap, however, allows concurrent reads and limited concurrent writes,
making it more scalable and often faster in practice.