English Africa Oil (3B4B) Revised EIA Pamphlet - Compressed
English Africa Oil (3B4B) Revised EIA Pamphlet - Compressed
English Africa Oil (3B4B) Revised EIA Pamphlet - Compressed
AREA OF INTEREST
*TotalEnergies has announced that it, together with its partner QatarEnergy,
have signed an agreement to participating interests in Block 3B/4B, where
TotalEnergies will hold a 33% participating interest in Block 3B/4B and assume
operatorship, while QatarEnergy will hold a 24% interest.
See: https://totalenergies.com/media/news/press-releases/south-africa-
totalenergies-expands-its-presence-orange-basin-new-offshore
Hondeklip Bay
St Helena Bay
Cape Town
UPDATED AND AMENDED OIL SPILL DRIFT MODELLING REPORT, WHICH NOW
MODELS BOTH A CONDENSATE BLOW OUT SCENARIO AS WELL AS A CRUDE
OIL BLOW OUT SCENARIO AS A WORST CASE.
We are here
FINAL EIA REPORT This incorporates all comments received on the
draft and revised EIA Report. This is submitted to
PUBLISHED: the Petroleum Agency of South Africa (PASA) for
consideration and review.
WHAT NEXT?
After the Department issues its decision, all I&APs registered on the project database
will be notified of the outcome of the application and the reasons for the decision
within 14 days of the date of the decision.
If anyone disagrees with the decision made by the Department, an appeal against the
decision may be submitted to the Department of Forestry Fisheries and Environment
(DFFE) within 20 days from the date the decision is communicated to I&APs.
Condensate spill
Condensate is a released product (liquid hydrocarbon) that rises to the surface
and is sometimes called ‘light oil’. Based on the possible extent of surface oiling,
the impact could affect large pelagic species (e.g. tuna and sword fish) and
demersal species (e.g. kingklip and hake). The likelihood of the impact
materialising differs according to the extent of the contamination in relation to
the location of fishing grounds. The likelihood of contamination is 100% for large
pelagic longline species, 50% for tuna pole-line species, 30% for demersal trawl
species and 20% for demersal longline species.
Crude spill
An assessment was done on four scenarios of an oil-spill probability (3.3%, 10%, 50%
and 90% possibility of an oil spill occurring). The 90% probability outline overlaps with
fishing grounds of the large pelagic longline species (e.g. tuna and sword fish). The 50%
probability outline overlaps with fishing grounds of demersal species (e.g. kingklip and
hake), and large pelagic longline and tuna pole-line species. The 10% probability outline
overlaps with demersal fishing grounds, small pelagic purse-seine (e.g. herring,
sardines, mackerel, anchovies), large pelagic longline, tuna pole-line, linefish and west
coast rock lobster grounds. The 3% probability contour extends across demersal fishing
grounds, small pelagic purse-seine, large pelagic longline, tuna pole-line, linefish and
inshore and offshore west coast rock lobster grounds.
IMPACTS ON LIVELIHOODS
Impacts on fisheries livelihoods from oil spills would include the periodic closure of
fishing grounds for clean-up and rejuvenation, long-term displacement from fishing areas
to minimize pollution effects, lost jobs and unemployment, and losses to seafood markets
and revenues. Following an oil spill, fishing vessels may avoid areas affected by
contamination to prevent the capture of contaminated fish and ensure product safety.
This avoidance behaviour can disrupt fishing operations, as vessels may need to relocate
to alternative fishing grounds, resulting in increased fuel costs and reduced catch
efficiency. Avoidance of contaminated areas may also lead to competition among fishing
vessels for access to unaffected fishing grounds, exacerbating resource conflicts and
management challenges. In cases where fish are exposed to oil spills and subsequently
captured by fishing operations, there is a risk of product rejection due to contamination.
Fish contaminated with oil residues may fail to meet quality standards set by regulatory
agencies and seafood markets, resulting in the rejection of entire catch batches. This
rejection not only leads to financial losses for fishing operations but also undermines
consumer confidence in seafood products sourced from affected regions. Studies have
shown that seafood market demand can decline significantly in the aftermath of oil spills,
particularly in regions directly impacted by contamination. Loss of market access can have
long-term economic consequences for fishing communities reliant on seafood trade.
IMPACTS ON CULTURE AND HERITAGE
Any impact on the integrity of the coastal and marine ecosystem through
an accidental oil spill could have an immediate detrimental effect on the
marine environment and thus in turn could impact various aspects which
make up people's tangible and intangible cultural heritage.
Spirituality
Ritual practice and spiritual engagement with the sea requires a healthy
ocean. Although the specialist reports note that only minor oil spills are likely
to take place, and is unlikely to reach the shore, for communities who have a
symbolic and spiritual relationship with the ocean and coast, the perceived
impacts would be considered high.
Sense of place
Valuable heritage towns and locations depend on the sense of place to attract
visitors, researchers and investors. If the place is negatively impacted by an oil
spill, people may not come to visit these towns and locations, thereby,
destroying the sense of place.
Natural Heritage
Natural heritage and cultural heritage are interdependent, and any impact on
the ocean, as natural heritage, will have a negative impact on cultural heritage.
Communities that rely on a wide range of life cycle and healing rituals that
involve the use of nature (i.e. fynbos and medicines from the sea) for cultural
practices, will be most impacted.
Health
People use the sea in cultural ways to improve, sustain and restore physical
and mental health. Access to a healthy ocean is critical as any impact on the
ocean, such as oil spills, may affect the health of coastal communities who
drink ocean water for cultural purposes.
GET INVOLVED
Why should I get involved?
The proposed project may impact communities residing close to the project
area and communities relying on the ocean. It is, therefore, important to share
your views of the proposed project. However, even if you do not live close to
the area of interest, you can get involved.
Gather as much information about the project. All project documents can be
accessed online HERE or physically at the following locations:
Will the project activity affect how fish and bird species move in
the area and will this impact our livelihoods?
If you work in the aquaculture sector, will the project impact the
businesses and jobs in this sector?
If you are from the tourism sector, will the project have a
positive or negative impact on tourism?
1. List your main concerns with the project and speak about whether these concerns
were addressed or dealt with at the public consultations.
2. State how you believe this Project will affect your livelihood and the livelihood of
your community?
3. State how you believe the Project will impact your access to and use of the ocean,
and how it will impact the movement of animal species (birds, fish, etc.).
4. State whether you think the Project will benefit you or your community, and what
those benefits will be.
5. State whether the positive and negative impacts of the Project were discussed
with you prior to or at the public consultations.
6.State how you believe the Project will impact your cultural and spiritual heritage if
it goes ahead.
7. State whether the public consultations were done in a language you understand
and whether it helped you understand what the project was about.
Name: _______________________________________
Community/Area: _________________________
Address: _____________________________________
Tel No: ______________________________________
Email: _______________________________________
Signature Date
____________________ ___________________
Developed in May 2024