Design of Cable Stayed Bridge
Design of Cable Stayed Bridge
1
Contents
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Importance of bridges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
. .
1.2 Components of Bridge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
1.2.1 Super structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
1.2.2 Sub structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . 4
.
1.3 Cable stayed bridge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
1.4 Design of deck slab. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
1.4.1 Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
1.5 Permissible Stress . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
1.5.1 Cross Section of Deck. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
1.5.2 Design of interior slab panels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
1.5.3 Bending moments (live load):- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
1.5.4 Bending moment (dead loads) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
1.5.5 Shear forces(live) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
1.5.6 Shear force (dead) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
1.5.7 Total Design moments and shear . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
1.5.8 Design of section . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
1.5.9 Check for shear . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
1.6 Design of longitudinal girder . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
1.6.1 Determination of Reaction factor: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
1.6.2 Dead load from slab for girder . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
1.6.3 Dead load bending moment and shear forces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
1.6.4 live load Bending moment and the shear forces. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
1.6.5 Design Bending moment and shear Force . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
1.6.6 Design of sections for maximum B.M and S.F . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
1.7 Design of cross girder . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
1.8 Design of pylon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
1.8.1 Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
1.8.2 Dead loads. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
1.8.3 Live load . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
1.9 Design of cable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
2
2.1 Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
3.1.1 Deck slab . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
3.1.2 Longitudinal girder . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
3.1.3 Cross girder . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
3.1.4 Pylon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
3.1.5 Cables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
2.2 Conclusion . .. …. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
3
1 INTRODUCTION
A bridge is a building that crosses a road, railroad, canal, river, valley, or other similar impediment.
in order to give the planned traffic above the blockage passage. The majority of bridges constructed
in the past were made of wood or stone masonry. Modern bridges are constructed using structural
steel, pre-stressed concrete, reinforced concrete, or a combination of RCC and structural steel.
While RCC is used to build bridges with modest spans, structural steel or pre-stressed concrete are
used to build bridges with very large spans.
Bridges have always played a significant role in our surroundings. They have been prominent
themes in both ancient and contemporary literature and art. Bridges have been the focal point of
village or city life, and battles have been fought over them. In many cases, the acquisition of a
strategic location has had a significant impact on the result of the conflict. The digital computer is
the most potent analytical tool available to structural engineers today; it can do a large volume of
calculations that would have taken years in a matter of minutes.
This comprises the deck slab, bearings, longitudinal and cross girders. This distributes the forces
produced by the weight to the substructures and sustains the weight that is put to it.
Bearings: By conveying the load received from the decking onto the substructure, the bearings
evenly distribute the load over the foundation material, which may not have sufficient bearing
strength to directly support the superstructure load.
1.2.2 S u b structure
This includes their base, wing walls or returns, and piers and abutments.
PIERS AND ABUTMENTS: These are vertical structures that support the deck or bearing and are
used to transfer the weight through the foundation to the bed or ground.
In order to preserve the approach bank's soil, which would otherwise have a natural angle of repose,
wing walls and returns are installed as an extension of the abutments.
FOUNDATION: This is intended to transfer weight from piers, abutments, and wings or returns to
the strata, distributing it uniformly. This needs to be placed deep enough to prevent it from being
undermined and damaged by the scour brought on by the river's flow. Although the aforementioned
components are technically functional, for safety reasons
This type of bridge is considered suitable for spans varying from 200m to 600m. The main
components of the girders are:
• 1. Towers
4
• 2.A number of high tensile steel cables
• 3. Deck made from concrete or steel spanning across the stiffened girders.
• The below figure shows the Cable stayed bridge
5
8.shear force(d e ad )
9.total design bending moments and shear force
10.design section
11.check for shear
1.4.1 D a t a
Clear width of Roadway = 7.5m Span (Centre t o Centre cable) =12m Thickness of wearing
coat = 80mm Concrete mix =M45
Steel =Fe500
σ cb=11.67N/mm
σst=240N/mm
m=280/3*σcb=280/3x11.67=7.99 8
J=1-h/3=1-0.280/3=0.9
n=1/(1+σst/m*σcb)=0.280
Q=0.5*n*J* σcb=0.5x11.67x2.80x0.9=1.67 m=8 J=0.9 n=0.28 Q=1.47
6
Tee beam and slab bridge deck
7
Figure: position of wheel load for maximum bending moment
8
1.5.5 Shear forces(live)
9
1.5.7 Total Design moments and shear
Longer span:
Effective depth for longspan using 10mm diameter bar
175-8-5=162mm
Ast=400mm
Spacing s=196.04mm
Adopt 10mm diameter bar with spacing 20mmc/c
10
For soli slabs T shall be not be exceed half of the value of Tmax
HENCE SAFE
11
1.6.2 Dead load from slab for girder
Dead load of deck is calculated with reference to figure weight of the parapet railing =
0.700 kN.m
wearing coat = (0.08*1.1*22) = 1.936 kN.m
Depth of the girder is assumed as 1200mm (100mm for every meter of the span) Depth of
rib = 1.0m
Width = 0.3m
Weight of the rib/m=(1*0.3*1*24)=7.2kN.m
Weight of cross girder = 7.2 kN/m
Reaction of the main girder = (7.2*2.5)=18kN Reaction from deck slab on each girder
=21.66kN.m
Total dead load /m on the girder = (21.66+7.2) = 28.86kN.m Maximum B.M at centre
of span is obtained in figure RA+RB=28.86X12+18X2=382.82kN
12
Figure : Dead load on main grider
RA=191.41kN RB=191.41KN
Max. BM due to udl = 191.4*6-28.56*6*3= 634. 38kN.M moment max=191.41*6-
18*4=1076.45-634.38= 442.08kN.M Dead load shear at support = 191.41kN
13
Figure: Position of class AA loads for maximum shear
Mmax= 1175.274kN.m
Vmax=577.56kN
The beams id designed as tee-section assuming an effective depth,d=1250mm
Approximate lever arm = (1250-(200/2))= 1150mm Ast=[1175.2*106 /(200*150)]=
5109.5mm
Provide 16 bars of 32mm diameter HYSD bars in four rows
Provide 32mm diameter bars
Maximize of bars not to exceed 32mm diameters as per IRC :21-1987
14
Nominal shear stress Tv=(V/bd)=(577.5.56*106 /300*1250)=1.540n/mm Hence safe
Assuming 2 bars of 32mm diameter to be bent up at support section,shear resisted
by the bentup bars is given by
Vs=(σsv.Asv.sinα)=[(200*2*804*1)/(1000*20 .5)]=227kN
Shear resisted by vertical stirrups is computed as balance shear =(557.56-
227)=350.56kN Using 10mm diameter ,4 legged stirrups,spacing
Sv=[ σsv.Ast.d/v]
=[(200*4*79*1250)/350.56*106]
=225mm
Provide 10mm diameter 4 legged stirrups at 150mm centres
15
Figure: position of live load for maximum B.M in cross girder
16
Figure: Reinforcement details of longitudinal girder
1.8.1 Data
17
1.8.2 Dead loads
Dead load due to Slab = 25056kN Dead load due to W.C = 7920kN Dead load due to
kerb = 2592kN Dead load due to parapet = 2880kN
Dead load due to cross girder = 6523.2kN
Dead load due to longitudinal girder = 15552kN
Dead load due to cables taking as 1.2 factor for total dead load
Total dead load = 72627kN
18
Figure : Reinforcement details of pylon
19
Total reaction ,R=700+604.8 = 1304.8kN P = R/Sinα
α = tan( − 1) ((90-12)/(150-6))
P = 1304.8/ (Sin (274926.75)) = 2795.449kN
Using 7 mm diameter high tensile wire initially stressed to 1200N/mm2
Force in each wire = 150/2 * 1200/1304.8 = 68.97kN
No of strands in each Cable = 2795.449/68.97 = 40.53 41
Figure: cables
2.1 Results
20
s.no Description L.L.B.M D.L.B.M Total units
1 Shorter span 31.01 2.688 33.698 KN-M
2 longer span 12.862 1.172 14.04 KN-M
3 shear force 59.50 7.216 66.716 KN-M
Table: Deck slab
2.1.4 Pylon
2.1.5 Cables
21
2.2 Conclusion
It has been demonstrated that the design of cable stayed bridge generally requires the
contribution of several technical professional, each with their own expert knowledge, in order
to achieve the best possible solutions to the various aspects that the cable stayed bridge
should satisfy. It is of fundamental importance that the project manager for a bridge project
always keeps in mind all aspects of project, their interconnection and any situation where
they conflict in the future. We should be involved in all major decision taken about the global
project, which could influence the conception or design of the cable stayed bridge.
22