Issue Based Risk Assessment For Roadmarking
Issue Based Risk Assessment For Roadmarking
TABLE OF CONTENTS:
1. Introduction:
2. Executive Summary:
3. Objectives:
4. Risk Assessment Method:
5. Annexure:
Introduction:
Arianovect (Pty)Ltd will ensure that our employees are continuously protected against hazards (Substandard Acts and
Substandard Conditions) at all times. Health and Safety to us is of utmost importance and we regard our Safety Record
as part of our proud Company Performance.
This Issue Base Risk Assessment was done following legal requirements as stipulated in the Occupational Health and
Safety Act (85 0f 1993) in that all risks associated with various tasks must be assessed with an action plan, with
emphasis on hazards with a risk in excess of 18.
Executive Summary:
These components address the major tasks associated with Road Marking and is broken down in the various tasks.
Objective:
The reason for compiling this Risk Assessment is to ensure that all hazards and Risks are identified and made known.
In doing that, adequate measures may be put into place to ensure the Safety of all persons and property.
Furthermore, this Risk Assessment also ensures that Arianovect (Pty)Ltd complies with the requirements as set out by
the Client as well as the Occupational Health and Safety Act.
Annexure:
• Supervisors Daily Risk Assessment Procedure (DSTI’S)
• Continuous assessment to Risk
• PPE Objective and Procedure
Impact (Hazard Effect / Consequence)
Arianovect(Pty)Ltd
(Where an event has more than one ‘Loss Type’, choose the ‘Consequence’ with the highest rating)
1 2 3 4 5
Loss Type
Insignificant Minor Moderate Major Catastrophic
Single fatality or loss of
First aid case / Medical treatment case Lost time injury /
(S/H) quality of life / Multiple fatalities / Impact on
Exposure to minor / Exposure to major Reversible impact on
Harm to People (Safety / Health) Irreversible impact on health ultimately fatal
health risk health risk health
health
Material environmental Serious environmental Major environmental
(EI) Minimal environmental Extreme environmental harm
harm – L2 incident harm – L2 incident harm – L2 incident
Environmental Impact harm – L1 incident – L3 incident irreversible
remediable short term remediable within LOM remediable post LOM
Risk Rating
No.
Likelihood
Hazard dealt with When STD Procedure Train. Manual
Risk Rating
Likelihood
Impact
Impact
Req. Comp Req. Comp. Req. Comp.
Sprayer not Sprayer inspected prior to
Injury to employee and
1 inspected prior to 4 3 18 mobilization on site by a 4 2 14 Supervisor to ensure X X
damage to property.
mobilization on site. competent person.
Competent, appointment,
Incompetent Injury to employee and Operator and
2 4 3 18 trained licensed operator. 4 2 14 X X X X
operator damage to property. Supervisor to ensure.
Operator to be medically fit.
Pre use inspection Injury to employee and Pre use inspection to be
3. 4 3 18 4 2 14 Supervisor to ensure X X
not done damage to property. done daily
Appointed and competent
Moving plant / operator. Flagman.
Injury to employee / Operator, Flagman and
4. Unsafe positioning of 4 3 18 Supervision. Reverse 4 2 14 X x
Damage to property Supervisor to enforce.
employees. beeper and rotating light.
Medical certificates.
Brake test daily. Daily
Injury to employee / Inspection by operator. Operator and
5. Equipment failure. 4 3 18 4 2 14 X X
Damage to property Monthly inspections by supervisor to ensure
competent person.
Excessive noise Hearing protection will be
6. Noise induced hearing loss 3 3 13 3 2 9 Supervisor to ensure X X
from Sprayer worn at all times.