0% found this document useful (0 votes)
172 views4 pages

Issue Based Risk Assessment For Roadmarking

Uploaded by

candice
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
172 views4 pages

Issue Based Risk Assessment For Roadmarking

Uploaded by

candice
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

Issued Based Risk Assessment

Date: Scope of Activity : Roadmarking

Revision Date: Reference Number: 1

TABLE OF CONTENTS:

1. Introduction:
2. Executive Summary:
3. Objectives:
4. Risk Assessment Method:
5. Annexure:

Introduction:
Arianovect (Pty)Ltd will ensure that our employees are continuously protected against hazards (Substandard Acts and
Substandard Conditions) at all times. Health and Safety to us is of utmost importance and we regard our Safety Record
as part of our proud Company Performance.

This Issue Base Risk Assessment was done following legal requirements as stipulated in the Occupational Health and
Safety Act (85 0f 1993) in that all risks associated with various tasks must be assessed with an action plan, with
emphasis on hazards with a risk in excess of 18.

Executive Summary:

The scope of the Risk Assessment is as listed below:


▪ Road Marking

These components address the major tasks associated with Road Marking and is broken down in the various tasks.
Objective:
The reason for compiling this Risk Assessment is to ensure that all hazards and Risks are identified and made known.
In doing that, adequate measures may be put into place to ensure the Safety of all persons and property.

Furthermore, this Risk Assessment also ensures that Arianovect (Pty)Ltd complies with the requirements as set out by
the Client as well as the Occupational Health and Safety Act.

Risk Assessment method:


The SWIFT method of identifying hazards has been used, in that this method is a systematic and holistic approach, thus
enabling all related hazards associated with Roadmarking to be identified.
During the Risk Assessment certain hazards were repeated as it was deemed necessary in that these hazards are
associated with the different task steps and required action should be necessary.

Annexure:
• Supervisors Daily Risk Assessment Procedure (DSTI’S)
• Continuous assessment to Risk
• PPE Objective and Procedure
Impact (Hazard Effect / Consequence)
Arianovect(Pty)Ltd
(Where an event has more than one ‘Loss Type’, choose the ‘Consequence’ with the highest rating)
1 2 3 4 5
Loss Type
Insignificant Minor Moderate Major Catastrophic
Single fatality or loss of
First aid case / Medical treatment case Lost time injury /
(S/H) quality of life / Multiple fatalities / Impact on
Exposure to minor / Exposure to major Reversible impact on
Harm to People (Safety / Health) Irreversible impact on health ultimately fatal
health risk health risk health
health
Material environmental Serious environmental Major environmental
(EI) Minimal environmental Extreme environmental harm
harm – L2 incident harm – L2 incident harm – L2 incident
Environmental Impact harm – L1 incident – L3 incident irreversible
remediable short term remediable within LOM remediable post LOM

(BI/MD) No disruption to Brief disruption to Partial loss of


Partial shutdown / R6m Substantial or total loss of
Business Interruption / Material Damage & Other operation / R120k to operation / R600k to operation /R60M to
to less than R60M operation / R450m and higher
Consequential Losses less than R600k less than R6M less than R450M
Serious breech of law;
Major breech of the
Minor legal issue; non investigation/report to Very considerable penalties &
(L&R) law; considerable
Low level legal issue compliance and authority, prosecution prosecutions. Multiple law
Legal & Regulatory prosecution and
breaches of the law and/or moderate suits & jail terms
penalties
penalty possible
Slight impact - public
(R/S/C) Limited impact - local Considerable impact - National impact - International impact -
awareness may exist
Impact on Reputation / Social / Community public concern regional public concern national public concern international public attention
but no public concern
Examples
Likelihood (Consider near-hits as well as actual Risk Rating
events)
The unwanted event has occurred
5 frequently; occurs in order of one or
11 (M) 16 (H) 20 (H) 23 (Ex) 25 (Ex)
Almost Certain more times per year & is likely to
reoccur within 1 year
The unwanted event has occurred
4 infrequently; occurs in order of less than
7 (M) 12 (M) 17 (H) 21 (Ex) 24 (Ex)
Likely once per year & is likely to reoccur
within 5 years
The unwanted event has happened in
3
the business at some time; or could 4 (L) 8 (M) 13 (H) 18 (H) 22 (Ex)
Possible
happen within 10 years

The unwanted event has happened in


2
the business at some time; or could 2 (L) 5 (L) 9 (M) 14 (H) 19 (H)
Unlikely
happen within 20 years
The unwanted event has never been
1 known to occur in the business; or it is
1 (L) 3 (L) 6 (M) 10 (M) 15 (H)
Rare highly unlikely that it will occur within 20
years

Risk Rating Risk Level Guidelines for Risk Matrix


21 to 25 (Ex) – Extreme Eliminate, avoid, implement specific action plans/procedures to manage & monitor
13 to 20 (H) – High Proactively manage
6 to 12 (M) – Medium Actively manage
1 to 5 (L) – Low Monitor & manage as appropriate
Residual R/R Controls Incorporated

Risk Associated with How is Hazard to be By Whom & By


Hazard Identified

Risk Rating
No.

Likelihood
Hazard dealt with When STD Procedure Train. Manual

Risk Rating
Likelihood
Impact

Impact
Req. Comp Req. Comp. Req. Comp.
Sprayer not Sprayer inspected prior to
Injury to employee and
1 inspected prior to 4 3 18 mobilization on site by a 4 2 14 Supervisor to ensure X X
damage to property.
mobilization on site. competent person.
Competent, appointment,
Incompetent Injury to employee and Operator and
2 4 3 18 trained licensed operator. 4 2 14 X X X X
operator damage to property. Supervisor to ensure.
Operator to be medically fit.
Pre use inspection Injury to employee and Pre use inspection to be
3. 4 3 18 4 2 14 Supervisor to ensure X X
not done damage to property. done daily
Appointed and competent
Moving plant / operator. Flagman.
Injury to employee / Operator, Flagman and
4. Unsafe positioning of 4 3 18 Supervision. Reverse 4 2 14 X x
Damage to property Supervisor to enforce.
employees. beeper and rotating light.
Medical certificates.
Brake test daily. Daily
Injury to employee / Inspection by operator. Operator and
5. Equipment failure. 4 3 18 4 2 14 X X
Damage to property Monthly inspections by supervisor to ensure
competent person.
Excessive noise Hearing protection will be
6. Noise induced hearing loss 3 3 13 3 2 9 Supervisor to ensure X X
from Sprayer worn at all times.

Excessive dust from All employees to required


7. Dust/ silica inhalation 4 3 18 4 2 14 Supervisor to ensure X x
sandblasting PPE i.e. dust masks
Emergency spill kit on
Major paint or oil standby. Drip trays to be Supervisor and SO to
8. Damage to environment 3 3 13 3 2 9 x x
spill from sprayer used and frequent ensure
maintenance thereof.

All relevant signage to be in


place prior to
Road signs are to be Injury to employee and
commencement of work.
9 in place and strictly damage to property. 4 3 18 4 2 14 Supervisor to ensure x X X x x
Toolbox talks and risk
adhered to Potential accidents
assessment to be discussed
with site staff.
Injury to employee and
Competent, appointment,
Untrained fire damage to property. Fire fighter and
10 4 3 18 trained fire fighter. Fire 4 2 14 X X X X
fighters Incorrect fire fighting Supervisor to ensure.
fighter to be medically fit.
equipment.

You might also like