Neutrophil Disorders and Their Management
Neutrophil Disorders and Their Management
Neutrophil Disorders and Their Management
net/publication/12060896
CITATIONS READS
143 1,049
2 authors, including:
Adam Finn
University of Bristol
469 PUBLICATIONS 25,952 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Adam Finn on 26 May 2014.
www.jclinpath.com
8 Lakshman, Finn
www.jclinpath.com
Neutrophil disorders and their management 9
www.jclinpath.com
10 Lakshman, Finn
others, the period can be as short as 15 days or best antibody screening procedure is a combi-
as long as 35 days, but tends to stay fixed for nation of granulocyte immunofluorescence
each individual.38 Patients also have character- and agglutination techniques,45 which in com-
istic values at which they cycle, with some bination detect antineutrophil antibodies in
cycling at very low values so that they only almost all such patients. Antibody titres may be
“reach” normality briefly every month. The low and screening for granulocyte specific
bone marrow shows hypoplasia or maturation antibodies in patient’s serum may have to be
arrest during neutropenic episodes and hyper- repeated several times.41 A positive test for
plasia during recovery. granulocyte antibody can be crucial in the
diagnosis of AIN and can render bone marrow
ANTIBODY MEDIATED NEUTROPENIAS biopsy unnecessary. Bone marrow examination
These consist of two main groups, autoim- reveals a normocellular or hypercellular mar-
mune neutropenia of infancy (AIN) and the row with myeloid hyperplasia.
antibody mediated neutropenias that occur in SCN often presents with infections in the
the neonatal period. Chronic benign neutrope- first month of life, while AIN usually presents
nia in childhood (CBN) is a label usually used later. The incidence and severity of bacterial
for children whose symptoms clinically resem- infections is usually much less in AIN than in
ble those of AIN and most probably have anti- SCN. AIN may be mistaken for cyclic neutro-
body mediated neutropenia, but in whom penia because it shows day to day fluctuations
antineutrophil antibodies cannot be of neutrophil counts. The main feature diVer-
demonstrated.9 39–41 Such children may also entiating AIN from both SCN and cyclic neu-
have AIN but are probably reaching the end of tropenia is the presence of granulocyte anti-
their neutropenic period, when the antibodies bodies. Such antibodies can also be found in
disappear and neutropenia resolves. Autoim- alloimmune neonatal neutropenia (see below),
mune neutropenias and other cytopenias are but in those cases, the antibodies do not last
also seen in association with some primary beyond 6 months of age and similar antibodies
specific immunodeficiencies. are detectable in the maternal serum.
www.jclinpath.com
Neutrophil disorders and their management 11
www.jclinpath.com
12 Lakshman, Finn
and frequency of infections. Although daily matched bone marrow transplant, all children
administration of rhG-CSF increases neutro- with reticular dysgenesis would succumb to
phil counts to normal within two weeks75–77 in overwhelming infection.84
children with CBN/AIN, in association with
clinical improvement and a reduction in the Disorders of neutrophil function
frequency of new infections,8 most authorities CHRONIC GRANULOMATOUS DISEASE (CGD)
will be influenced considerably by the clinical CGD is a rare disorder characterised by absent
picture in deciding which children to treat. or reduced function of the respiratory burst,
rhG-CSF has also been used in neonatal which produces oxygen free radicals important
neutropenia of various aetiologies47 78 and in for intracellular killing.
treating the neutropenia associated with GSD CGD is caused by congenital defects in the
1b and Shwachman-Diamond syndrome. Side five components of the enzyme NADPH
eVects thought to be the result of treatment oxidase (fig 1), which catalyses the respiratory
included osteoporosis/osteopenia, bone pains, burst. The mutations underlying such defects
hepatomegaly, haematuria, thrombocytopenia, are heterogenous. In about two thirds of cases,
and splenomegaly (observed radiologically but CGD occurs as an X linked recessive disease
not clinically). caused by a mutation in the glycoprotein 91
phagocyte oxidase gene (gp91 phox gene),
Intravenous immunoglobulin treatment (IVIG) which encodes a membrane bound subunit of
In those diagnosed to have antibody mediated the enzyme; the remaining one third of cases
neutropenia and suVering recurrent or serious are inherited in an autosomal recessive manner
infections, treatment measures available in- and are caused by defects in the cytosol
clude ã-globulin infusions. Although IVIG can components p47phox (25%), p67phox (5%),
be used to correct neutrophil counts, the eVect or the smaller membrane bound subunit,
is short lived and this approach is only used p22phox (5%). In general, patients with
occasionally—for example, as an adjunctive p22phox and p67phox deficiency CGD have a
approach in severe and life threatening similar clinical phenotype to those with X
infections,79–82 unless the child has an associ- linked 91phox deficiency, but patients with 47
ated disorder of antibody production. phox deficiency follow a milder course.85–88
Patients with X linked CGD can, on the basis
Granulocyte transfusions of genotypic analysis, be divided into the X910
Granulocyte or buVy coat transfusions have (complete deficiency), X91− (partial defi-
been used as an adjuvant management strategy ciency), or X91+ (stable but inactive gp91
in individuals with chronic neutropenia and phox) subgroups.89
focal bacterial or fungal infections not respon-
sive to usual treatment. Transfusion of paternal Clinical features
neutrophils that lack the sensitising antigen Most children with CGD present in the 1st
have been described in the treatment of year of life with recurrent bacterial and fungal
neonates with alloimmune neutropenia with infections.90 The most frequently encountered
sepsis. However, the safety and eVectiveness of pathogens are S aureus, Aspergillus spp, enteric
this treatment modality are unknown. Gram negative bacteria (including S marcescens
and various salmonella species), and Burkhol-
deria cepacia. Catalase negative organisms
Bone marrow transplantation (BMT)
(such as Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemo-
In patients with SCN who do not respond to
philus influenzae) are less frequent pathogens in
rhG-CSF, bone marrow transplantation re-
83 children with CGD; the hydrogen peroxide
mains an option. Without an early HLA
they produce may be converted to hypo-
X linked chorous acid by neutrophil myeloperoxidase
Autosomal recessive 2/3 of cases and used to kill the bacteria. Infections include
Chromosome 16q24 (males affected, female pneumonia, cutaneous infections (including
Rare carriers usually healthy) perirectal abscesses), lymphadenitis, liver ab-
scess, osteomyelitis, septicaemia, and otitis
media. One of the hallmarks of the condition is
the presence of granulomas caused by the
chronic inflammatory response to the patho-
p22phox gp91phox Plasma membrane gen. These can mimic Crohn’s disease or can
present with obstructive gastrointestinal or uri-
nary symptoms. Features commonly found on
Cytoplasm clinical examination include failure to thrive,
P47phox p67phox
hepatosplenomegaly, lymphadenopathy, and
anaemia.
p40phox Finn et al reviewed 31 patients followed up
Autosomal recessive
Autosomal recessive Rare
between 1964 and 1989; the actuarial analysis
1/4 of cases Chromosome 1q25 showed 50% survival to the 3rd decade of life.91
Chromosome 7q11.23 With newer treatment approaches, the progno-
sis may be better, particularly for those with
CGD caused by 47 phox deficiency.89
No cases described Carriers of autosomal recessive forms of
Figure 1 Components of NADPH oxidase and subgroups of chronic granulomatous CGD are asymptomatic. Approximately half
disease. of X linked carriers suVer from recurrent
www.jclinpath.com
Neutrophil disorders and their management 13
stomatitis and/or gingivitis and about 25% If all four subunits are detectable on western
develop discoid lupus erythematosus on sun blot in an individual with respiratory burst
exposure. A very small proportion of X linked dysfunction, the diagnosis may be a so called
CGD carriers may suVer from increased, “+variant” of CGD. These are conditions
although mild, infections. where the synthesis of the protein is normal but
the enzyme activity is lost. In such cases, cell
Investigations free oxidase assays are used to diVerentiate
The diagnosis of CGD can be made at diVerent defects in the cytosolic components from those
levels. The bacterial killing test is a comprehen- aVecting the membrane components. Some
sive screening test for defects in opsonisation, individuals have partial loss of 91 phox and
phagocytosis, or intracellular killing. It looks at proportional loss of NADPH oxidase activity;
the ability of phagocytes to kill catalase positive they are referred to as “−variants”.
bacteria, such as S aureus, in vitro. However, it Further tests can be done to identify the
is technically diYcult and time consuming to defect at the DNA level by mutation analysis;
perform. The phorbol myristate acetate (PMA) for autosomal recessive forms, this is the best
nitroblue tetrazolium (NBT) slide test is an way to identify carrier status. Mutations may
extremely easy and reliable screening test for involve deletions, insertions, splice site muta-
disorders of oxidative metabolism. It detects all tions, missense mutations, or nonsense muta-
but the most mild X linked CGD carriers and tions. Prenatal diagnosis of CGD can be made
variants.92 Neutrophils are exposed to a stimu- by the analysis of DNA from chorionic villous
lus, such as PMA, incubated with NBT, and sampling or amniotic fluid cells if the specific
staining assessed by counting 100 neutrophils mutation in the family has previously been
on a smear. After stimulation, more than 95% identified.94
of neutrophils from healthy individuals stain
positive, with a blue black precipitate of forma-
zan granules, whereas < 5% of neutrophils are Management
stained in individuals with CGD. Carriers of X Management involves measures to reduce the
linked CGD usually show 30–70% positive frequency of infections and to ensure their
cells. However, the test may give falsely prompt recognition and treatment. Avoidance
positive/normal results in certain mild forms of of BCG vaccination is advocated; children
CGD. More sensitive quantitative tests to must receive all other routine immunisations
measure respiratory burst activity in stimulated and a yearly influenza vaccine. Oral and
neutrophils using flow cytometric analysis are perianal hygiene are important and regular
now available.93 Neutrophils are stimulated in dental care, including antibacterial mouth
vitro using reagents such as PMA and the washes, can help prevent gingivitis and peri-
superoxide or hydrogen peroxide generated is odontitis. Injuries must be washed well and
measured. In one assay, hydrogen peroxide rinsed with antiseptic solutions. Regular
generated by stimulated neutrophils converts prophylaxis with cotrimoxazole can reduce
dihydrorhodamine to rhodamine and this is bacterial infections.58 The evidence is less clear
detected using a fluorescent detector. Other about antifungal prophylaxis,95 96 but itracona-
methods, generally used in research rather than zole is often used in severe cases or where inva-
clinical diagnosis, involve the measurement of sive fungal infection has occurred previously.
oxygen consumption using an oxygen elec- Gallin et al showed that prophylactic treatment
trode, or estimating superoxide generation by with ã interferon (IFN-ã) can reduce infection
the reduction of ferricytochrome c, or by rates in patients with CGD.85 97 98 However, the
hydrogen peroxide production by oxidation of infection rates in the placebo control group in
homovanillic acid. Chemiluminescence with that study were higher than those generally
luminol can also be used as a sensitive test of seen in the UK where daily antimicrobial (cot-
NADPH oxidase activity. rimoxazole) prophylaxis is routine. Accord-
The diagnosis of suboptimal respiratory ingly, in most UK centres IFN-ã prophylaxis is
burst dysfunction leads to further investiga- oVered only in selected cases. IFN-ã does not
tions to identify the subgroup of CGD. correct the defective metabolism in CGD but
Western blot analysis using antibodies against
may work by augmenting nitric oxide produc-
each of the four NADPH oxidase components
tion in neutrophils.99 Once infection occurs,
can show whether one of the components is
this must be treated with appropriate
missing. The absence of 47 phox protein and
67 phox protein is indicative of a gene parenteral antibiotics in suYcient dosage and
mutation; however, for the membrane bound duration to eradicate the organism; often
components, if one (either the 91 kDa or the abscess formation will need surgical measures.
22 kDa phox protein) is missing the other will Although corticosteroids should be generally
be absent too because all the subunits are avoided in CGD, they are useful in low doses in
needed for stabilisation and full expression. In the management of symptomatic complica-
such cases, it is useful to confirm or refute car- tions of granuloma formation at diVerent
rier status in the mother using the NBT slide sites.100 101 Results of bone marrow transplanta-
test or dihydrorhodamine flow cytometry assay. tion have been much better in the past decade
However, failure to find that the mother is an X (using matched siblings as donors), although
linked carrier does not completely rule out X numbers are still limited, and there are reports
linked CGD; such defects can occur as new of successful outcomes even in the most
mutations. severely infected patients.102
www.jclinpath.com
14 Lakshman, Finn
www.jclinpath.com
Neutrophil disorders and their management 15
www.jclinpath.com
16 Lakshman, Finn
www.jclinpath.com
Neutrophil disorders and their management 17
www.jclinpath.com
18 Lakshman, Finn
20 Touw IP, Dong F. Severe congenital neutropenia terminat- 53 Ades LC, Gedeon AK, Wilson MJ, et al. Barth syndrome:
ing in acute myeloid leukemia: disease progression clinical features and confirmation of gene localisation to
associated with mutations in the granulocyte-colony stimu- distal Xq28. Am J Med Genet 1993;45:327–34.
lating factor receptor gene. Leukemia Res 1996;20:629–31. 54 Hernandez A, Olivares F, Cantu JM. Autosomal recessive
21 Bernard T, Gale RE, Evans JP, et al. Mutations of the onychotrichodysplasia, chronic neutropenia and mild men-
granulocyte-colony stimulating factor receptor in patients tal retardation. Delineation of the syndrome. Clin Genet
with severe congenital neutropenia are not required for 1979;15:147–52.
transformation to acute myeloid leukaemia and may be a 55 Andrews FJ, Katz F, Jones A, et al. CD40 ligand deficiency
bystander phenomenon. Br J Haematol 1998;101:141–9. presenting as unresponsive neutropenia. Arch Dis Child
22 Gilman PA, Jackson DP, Guild HG. Congenital 1996;74:458–9.
agranulocytosis: prolonged survival and terminal acute 56 Levy J, Espanol BT, Thomas C, et al. Clinical spectrum of
leukemia. Blood 1970;36:576–85. X-linked hyper-IgM syndrome. J Pediatr 1997;131:47–54.
23 Rosen RB, Kang SJ. Congenital agranulocytosis terminating 57 Farrar JE, Rohrer J, Conley ME. Neutropenia in X-linked
in acute myelomonocytic leukemia. J Pediatr 1979;94:406–8. agammaglobulinemia. Clin Immunol Immunopathol 1996;
24 Hestdal K, Welte K, Lie SO, et al. Severe congenital 81:271–6.
neutropenia: abnormal growth and diVerentiation of 58 Smith J, Finn A. Antimicrobial prophylaxis. Arch Dis Child
myeloid progenitors to granulocyte colony-stimulating fac- 1999;80:388–92.
tor (G-CSF) but normal response to G-CSF plus stem cell 59 Komiyama A, Ishiguro A, Kubo T, et al. Increases in neutro-
factor. Blood 1993;82:2991–7.
phil counts by purified human urinary colony-stimulating
25 Alonso K, Dew JM, Starke WR. Thymic alymphoplasia and factor in chronic neutropenia of childhood. Blood 1988;71:
congenital aleukocytosis (reticular dysgenesia). Arch Pathol 41–5.
Lab Med 1972;94:179–83.
26 Lange RD, Crowder CG, Cruz P, et al. Cyclic neutropenia. 60 Bonilla MA, Gillio AP, Ruggeiro M, et al. EVects of recom-
A tale of two brothers and their family. Am J Pediatr Hema- binant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on
tol Oncol 1981;3:127–33. neutropenia in patients with congenital agranulocytosis. N
27 Chusid MJ, Casper JT, Camitta BM, et al. Cyclic neutrope- Engl J Med 1989;320:1574–80.
nia in identical twins. Am J Med 1986;80:994–6. 61 Welte K, Dale D. Pathophysiology and treatment of severe
28 Lange RD. Cyclic hematopoiesis: human cyclic neutrope- chronic neutropenia. Ann Hematol 1996;72:158–65.
nia. Exp Hematol 1983;11:435–51. 62 Weston B, Todd RF3, Axtell R, et al. Severe congenital
29 Jacobsen N, Broxmeyer HE. Oscillations of granulocytic neutropenia: clinical eVects and neutrophil function during
and megakaryocytic progenitor cell populations in cyclic treatment with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. J
neutropenia in man. Scand J Haematol 1979;23:33–6. Lab Clin Med 1991;117:282–90.
30 Guerry D, Dale DC, Omine M, et al. Periodic hematopoiesis 63 Boxer LA, Hutchinson R, Emerson S. Recombinant human
in human cyclic neutropenia. J Clin Invest 1973;52:3220– granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor in the treatment of
30. patients with neutropenia. Clin Immunol Immunopathol
31 Cap J, Mikulecky M. Cyclic neutropenia in a family with 1992;62:S39–46.
evidence of monocytes, lymphocytes, plasmocytes, eosi- 64 Hirashima K, Yoshida Y, Asano S, et al. Clinical eVect of
nophils and basophils cycling. Eur J Haematol 1989;43: recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor
188–9. (rhG-CSF) on various types of neutropenia including
32 Dale DC, Hammond WP. Cyclic neutropenia: a clinical cyclic neutropenia. Biotherapy 1991;3:297–307.
review. Blood Rev 1988;2:178–85. 65 Bonilla MA, Dale D, Zeidler C, et al. Long-term safety of
33 Krance RA, Spruce WE, Forman SJ, et al. Human cyclic treatment with recombinant human granulocyte colony-
neutropenia transferred by allogeneic bone marrow graft- stimulating factor (r-metHuG-CSF) in patients with
ing. Blood 1982;60:1263–6. severe congenital neutropenias. Br J Haematol 1994;88:
34 Horwitz M, Benson KF, Person RE, et al. Mutations in 723–30.
ELA2, encoding neutrophil elastase, define a 21-day 66 Imashuku S, Tsuchida M, Sasaki M, et al. Recombinant
biological clock in cyclic haematopoiesis. Nat Genet human granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor in the treat-
1999;23:433–6. ment of patients with chronic benign granulocytopenia and
35 Bar-Joseph G, Halberthal M, Sweed Y, et al. Clostridium congenital agranulocytosis (Kostmann’s syndrome). Acta
septicum infection in children with cyclic neutropenia. J Paediatr 1992;81:133–6.
Pediatr 1997;131:317–19. 67 Schmitz S, Franke H, Wichmann HE, et al. The eVect of
36 O’Hanrahan T, Dark P, Irving MH. Cyclic neutropenia— continuous G-CSF application in human cyclic
unusual cause of acute abdomen. Report of a case. Dis neutropenia: a model analysis. Br J Haematol 1995;90:41–
Colon Rectum 1991;34:1125–7. 7.
37 Langer JC, Papa MZ, HoVman MA, et al. Cyclic neutrope- 68 Jayabose S, Tugal O, Sandoval C, et al. Recombinant human
nia with colonic perforation and nonhealing colocutaneous granulocyte colony stimulating factor in cyclic
fistula. J Pediatr Surg 1990;25:346–8. neutropenia: use of a new 3-day-a-week regimen. Am J
38 Morley AA, Carew JP, Baikie AG. Familial cyclical Pediatr Hematol Oncol 1994;16:338–40.
neutropenia. Br J Haematol 1967;13:719–38. 69 Danielsson L, Harmenberg J. Intermittent rG-CSF treat-
39 Conway LT, Clay ME, Kline WE, et al. Natural history of ment in cyclic neutropenia. Eur Haematol 1992;48:123–4.
primary autoimmune neutropenia in infancy. Pediatrics 70 Tsunogake S, Nagashima S, Maekawa R, et al. Myeloid pro-
1987;79:728–33. genitor cell growth characteristics and eVect of G-CSF in a
40 Bruin MC, von dem Borne AE, Tamminga RY, et al. Neutro- patient with congenital cyclic neutropenia. Int J Hematol
phil antibody specificity in diVerent types of childhood 1991;54:251–6.
autoimmune neutropenia. Blood 1999;94:1797–802. 71 Locatelli F, Pedrazzoli P, Zecca M, et al. Recombinant
41 Bux J, Behrens G, Jaeger G, et al. Diagnosis and clinical human granulocyte–macrophage colony stimulating factor
course of autoimmune neutropenia in infancy: analysis of (rHuGM-CSF) in cyclic neutropenia. Haematologica 1991;
240 cases. Blood 1998;91:181–6. 76:238–9.
42 Harmon DC, Weitzman SA, Stossel TP. The severity of 72 Hanada T, Ono I, Nagasawa T. Childhood cyclic neutrope-
immune neutropenia correlates with the maturational spe- nia treated with recombinant human granulocyte colony
cificity of antineutrophil antibodies. Br J Haematol stimulating factor. Br J Haematol 1990;75:135–7.
1984;58:209–15. 73 Hammond WP, Price TH, Souza LM, et al. Treatment of
43 van der Veen JP, Hack CE, Engelfriet CP, et al. Chronic cyclic neutropenia with granulocyte colony-stimulating
idiopathic and secondary neutropenia: clinical and sero- factor. N Engl J Med 1989;320:1306–11.
logical investigations. Br J Haematol 1986;63:161–71. 74 Heussner P, Haase D, Kanz L, et al. G-CSF in the long-term
44 Boxer LA, Greenberg MS, Boxer GJ, et al. Auto-immune treatment of cyclic neutropenia and chronic idiopathic
neutropenia. N Engl J Med 1975;293:748–53. neutropenia in adult patients. Int J Hematol 1995;62:225–
45 Bux J, Chapman J. Report on the second international 34.
granulocyte serology workshop. Transfusion 1997;37:977– 75 Shastri KA, Logue GL. Autoimmune neutropenia. Blood
83. 1993;81:1984–95.
46 Bux J, Jung KD, Kauth T, et al. Serological and clinical 76 Kuijpers TW, de Haas M, de Groot CJ, et al. The use of
aspects of granulocyte antibodies leading to alloimmune rhG-CSF in chronic autoimmune neutropenia: reversal of
neonatal neutropenia. Transfus Med 1992;2:143–9. autoimmune phenomena, a case history. Br J Haematol
47 Rodwell RL, Gray PH, Taylor KM, et al. Granulocyte 1996;94:464–9.
colony stimulating factor treatment for alloimmune neona- 77 Krishnan K, Ross CW, Bockenstedt PL, et al. Successful
tal neutropenia. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1996;75: treatment of autoimmune neutropenia with recombinant
F57–8. human granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (R-metHuG-
48 Ambruso DR, McCabe ER, Anderson D, et al. Infectious CSF). Clin Lab Haematol 1997;19:105–9.
and bleeding complications in patients with glycogenosis 78 Russell AR, Davies EG, Ball SE, et al. Granulocyte colony
Ib. Am J Dis Child 1985;139:691–7. stimulating factor treatment for neonatal neutropenia. Arch
49 Schroten H, Roesler J, Breidenbach T, et al. Granulocyte Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1995;72:F53–4.
and granulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulating factors 79 Bussel J, Lalezari P, Hilgartner M, et al. Reversal of neutro-
for treatment of neutropenia in glycogen storage disease penia with intravenous gammaglobulin in autoimmune
type Ib. J Pediatr 1991;119:748–54. neutropenia of infancy. Blood 1983;62:398–400.
50 Smith OP, Hann IM, Chessells JM, et al. Haematological 80 Dunkel IJ, Bussel JB. New developments in the treatment of
abnormalities in Shwachman-Diamond syndrome. Br J neutropenia. Am J Dis Child 1993;147:994–1000.
Haematol 1996;94:279–84. 81 Hilgartner MW, Bussel J. Use of intravenous immunoglobu-
51 Barth PG, Wanders RJ, Vreken P. X-linked cardioskeletal lin for the treatment of autoimmune neutropenia of child-
myopathy and neutropenia (Barth syndrome). J Pediatr hood and autoimmune hemolytic anemia. Am J Med 1987;
1999;135:273–6. 83:25–9.
52 Barth PG, Wanders RJ, Vreken P, et al. X-linked cardioskel- 82 Kurtzberg J, Friedman HS, ChaVee S, et al. EYcacy of
etal myopathy and neutropenia (Barth syndrome). J Inherit intravenous gamma globulin in autoimmune mediated
Metab Dis 1999;22:555–67. blood dyscrasias. Am J Med 1987;83:4–9.
www.jclinpath.com
Neutrophil disorders and their management 19
83 Ryan M, Will AM, Testa N, et al. Severe congenital neutro- 107 Abramson JS, Mills EL, Sawyer MK, et al. Recurrent
penia unresponsive to G-CSF. Br J Haematol 1995;91:43– infections and delayed separation of the umbilical cord in
5. an infant with abnormal phagocytic cell locomotion and
84 Levinsky RJ, Tiedeman K. Successful bone-marrow trans- oxidative response during partial phagocytosis. J Pediatr
plantation for reticular dysgenesis. Lancet 1983;1:671–2. 1981;99:887–94.
85 Gallin JI, Malech HL, Weening RS, et al. A controlled trial 108 Bedlow AJ, Davies EG, Moss AL, et al. Pyoderma
of interferon gamma to prevent infection in chronic granu- gangrenosum in a child with congenital partial deficiency
lomatous disease (the international chronic granulomatous of leucocyte adherence glycoproteins. Br J Dermatol 1998;
disease cooperative study group). N Engl J Med 1991;324: 139:1064–7.
509–16. 109 Quie PG, Mills EL, Roberts RL, et al. Disorders of the
86 Margolis DM, Melnick DA, Alling DW, et al. Trimethoprim- polymorphonuclear phagocytic system. In: Stiehm ER, ed.
sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis in the management of Immunologic disorders in infants and children. Philadelphia:
chronic granulomatous disease. J Infect Dis 1990;162:723– WB Saunders, 1996:446–7.
6.
87 Forrest CB, Forehand JR, Axtell RA, et al. Clinical features 110 Finn A, Rebuck N. Measurement of adhesion molecule
and current management of chronic granulomatous expression on neutrophils and fixation. J Immunol Methods
disease. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 1988;2:253–66. 1994;171:267–8.
88 Weening RS, Adriaansz LH, Weemaes CM, et al. Clinical 111 Arnaout MA. Molecular basis of leukocyte adhesion
diVerences in chronic granulomatous disease in patients deficiency. In: Horton M, ed. Biochemistry of macrophages
with cytochrome b-negative or cytochrome b-positive neu- and related cell types. New York: Plenum, 1993:335–46.
trophils. J Pediatr 1985;107:102–4. 112 Thomas C, Le Deist F, Cavazzana-Calvo M, et al. Results
89 Roos D, Curnutte JT. Chronic granulomatous disease. In: of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation in patients with
Ochs HD, Smith CIE, Puck JM, eds. Primary immuno- leukocyte adhesion deficiency. Blood 1995;86:1629–35.
deficiency diseases—a molecular and genetic approach. New 113 Marquardt T, Brune T, Luhn K, et al. Leukocyte adhesion
York: Oxford University Press, 1999:353–74. deficiency II syndrome, a generalized defect in fucose
90 Johnston RB, Newman SL. Chronic granulomatous disease. metabolism. J Pediatr 1999;134:681–8.
Pediatr Clin North Am 1977;24:365–76. 114 Price TH, Ochs HD, Gershoni-Baruch R, et al. In vivo
91 Finn A, Hadzic N, Morgan G, et al. Prognosis of chronic neutrophil and lymphocyte function studies in a patient
granulomatous disease. Arch Dis Child 1990;65:942–5. with leukocyte adhesion deficiency type II. Blood 1994;84:
92 Porter CD, Parkar MH, Collins MK, et al. Superoxide pro- 1635–9.
duction by normal and chronic granulomatous disease 115 Grimbacher B, Holland SM, Gallin JI, et al. Hyper-IgE
(CGD) patient-derived EBV-transformed B cell lines syndrome with recurrent infections—an autosomal domi-
measured by chemiluminescence-based assays. J Immunol nant multisystem disorder. N Engl J Med 1999;340:692–
Methods 1992;155:151–7. 702.
93 Roesler J, Hecht M, Freihorst J, et al. Diagnosis of chronic 116 Borges WG, Augustine NH, Hill HR. Defective
granulomatous disease and of its mode of inheritance by interleukin-12/interferon-gamma pathway in patients with
dihydrorhodamine 123 and flow microcytofluorometry. hyperimmunoglobulinemia E syndrome. J Pediatr 2000;
Eur J Pediatr 1991;150:161–5. 136:176–80.
94 Pelham A, O’Reilly MA, Malcolm S, et al. RFLP and 117 Jeppson JD, JaVe HS, Hill HR. Use of recombinant human
deletion analysis for X-linked chronic granulomatous dis- interferon gamma to enhance neutrophil chemotactic
ease using the cDNA probe: potential for improved prena- responses in Job syndrome of hyperimmunoglobulinemia E
tal diagnosis and carrier determination. Blood 1990;76: and recurrent infections. J Pediatr 1991;118:383–7.
820–4. 118 Summerfield JA, Sumiya M, Levin M, et al. Association of
95 Fischer A, Segal AW, Seger R, et al. The management of mutations in mannose binding protein gene with childhood
chronic granulomatous disease. Eur J Pediatr 1993;152:
896–9. infection in consecutive hospital series. BMJ 1997;314:
96 Mouy R, Veber F, Blanche S, et al. Long-term itraconazole 1229–32.
prophylaxis against aspergillus infections in thirty-two 119 Super M, Thiel S, Lu J, et al. Association of low levels of
patients with chronic granulomatous disease. J Pediatr mannan-binding protein with a common defect of opsoni-
1994;125:998–1003. sation. Lancet 1989;2:1236–9.
97 Mouy R, Seger R, Bourquin JP, et al. Interferon gamma for 120 Bredius RG, Derkx BH, Fijen CA, et al. Fc gamma recep-
chronic granulomatous disease. N Engl J Med 1991;325: tor IIa (CD32) polymorphism in fulminant meningococcal
1516–17. septic shock in children. J Infect Dis 1994;170:848–53.
98 Weening RS, Leitz GJ, Seger RA. Recombinant human 121 Sanders LA, van de Winkel JG, Rijkers GT, et al. Fc
interferon-gamma in patients with chronic granulomatous gamma receptor IIa (CD32) heterogeneity in patients with
disease—European follow up study. Eur J Pediatr 1995;154: recurrent bacterial respiratory tract infections. J Infect Dis
295–8. 1994;170:854–61.
99 Ahlin A, Larfars G, Elinder G, et al. Gamma interferon 122 Sanders LA, Feldman RG, Voorhorst-Ogink MM, et al.
treatment of patients with chronic granulomatous disease is Human immunoglobulin G (IgG) Fc receptor IIA (CD32)
associated with augmented production of nitric oxide by polymorphism and IgG2-mediated bacterial phagocytosis
polymorphonuclear neutrophils. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol by neutrophils. Infect Immun 1995;63:73–81.
1999;6:420–4. 123 Flesch BK, Bauer F, Neppert J. Rapid typing of the human
100 Danziger RN, Goren AT, Becker J, et al. Outpatient man- Fc gamma receptor IIA polymorphism by polymerase
agement with oral corticosteroid therapy for obstructive chain reaction amplification with allele-specific primers.
conditions in chronic granulomatous disease. J Pediatr Transfusion 1998;38:174–6.
1993;122:303–5. 124 van Schie RC, Wilson ME. Saliva: a convenient source of
101 Chin TW, Stiehm ER, Falloon J, et al. Corticosteroids in DNA for analysis of bi-allelic polymorphisms of Fc gamma
treatment of obstructive lesions of chronic granulomatous receptor IIA (CD32) and Fc gamma receptor IIIB
disease. J Pediatr 1987;111:349–52. (CD16). J Immunol Methods 1997;208:91–101.
102 Ozsahin H, von Planta M, Muller I, et al. Successful treat- 125 Barrat FJ, Auloge L, Pastural E, et al. Genetic and physical
ment of invasive aspergillosis in chronic granulomatous mapping of the Chediak-Higashi syndrome on chromo-
disease by bone marrow transplantation, granulocyte some 1q42–43. Am J Hum Genet 1996;59:625–32.
colony-stimulating factor-mobilized granulocytes, and li- 126 Spritz RA. Chediak-Higashi syndrome. In: Ochs HD,
posomal amphotericin-B. Blood 1998;92:2719–24. Smith CIE, Puck JM, eds. Primary immunodeficiency
103 Parry MF, Root RK, Metcalf JA, et al. Myeloperoxidase diseases—a molecular and genetic approach. New York:
deficiency: prevalence and clinical significance. Ann Intern Oxford University Press, 1999:389–96.
Med 1981;95:293–301.
104 Marlin SD, Morton CC, Anderson DC, et al. LFA-1 127 Gallin JI, Elin RJ, Hubert RT, et al. EYcacy of ascorbic
immunodeficiency disease. Definition of the genetic defect acid in Chediak-Higashi syndrome (CHS): studies in
and chromosomal mapping of alpha and beta subunits of humans and mice. Blood 1979;53:226–34.
the lymphocyte function-associated antigen 1 (LFA-1) by 128 Haddad E, Le Deist F, Blanche S, et al. Treatment of
complementation in hybrid cells. J Exp Med 1986;164:855– Chediak-Higashi syndrome by allogenic bone marrow
67. transplantation: report of 10 cases. Blood 1995;85:3328–
105 Hogg N, Stewart MP, Scarth SL, et al. A novel leukocyte 33.
adhesion deficiency caused by expressed but nonfunctional 129 Rebuck N, Finn A. Polymorphonuclear granulocyte
beta2 integrins Mac-1 and LFA-1. J Clin Invest 1999;103: expression of CD11a/CD18, CD11b/CD18 and L-selectin
97–106. in normal individuals. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 1994;
106 Kuijpers TW, van Lier RA, Hamann D, et al. Leukocyte 8:189–96.
adhesion deficiency type 1 (LAD-1)/variant. A novel 130 Yang KD, Hill HR. Assessment of neutrophil function. In:
immunodeficiency syndrome characterized by dysfunc- Rich RB, ed. Clinical immunology: principles and practice. St
tional beta2 integrins. J Clin Invest 1997;100:1725–33. Louis: Mosby-Year Book, 1996:2148–56.
www.jclinpath.com