Calculation Sheet
Calculation Sheet
Live Loads:
CLT Deck:
1
The University of Sheffield
Department of Civil and Structural Engineering
Module: CIV3203 Prepared by:
Ellia Halaseh
Date:
07/05/2024
Reference Calculation Output
-Super Imposed Dead Load (SDL): 0.25 KN/m2 (Assumed SDL For Finishes and Services).
-Dead Load (DL): 0.79 + 0.25 = 1.04 KN/m2 = 1.1 KN/m2.
-Imposed Dead Load (IL): 5 KN/m2.
-Assume that the Bottom Glulam Chords are going to take the full Imposed Load to be
conservative.
2
w k × L 18× 62
-Moment (Med) = = =81 KNm .
8 8
-Overall Factored UDL acting on the whole slab: (18 x 2) + (2 x 0.44 x 1.35) = 37.188 KN/m
= 37.2 KN/m.
2
The University of Sheffield
Department of Civil and Structural Engineering
Module: CIV3203 Prepared by:
Ellia Halaseh
Date:
07/05/2024
Reference Calculation Output
-Overall Factored UDL acting on half of the slab: (37.2/2) = 18.6 KN/m.
2 2
w L 18.6 × 50
-Horizontal Chord Forces: = =581.3 KN .
8h 8 ×10
3
The University of Sheffield
Department of Civil and Structural Engineering
Module: CIV3203 Prepared by:
Ellia Halaseh
Date:
07/05/2024
Reference Calculation Output
-Vertical Chord Force from Top Arch: 581.3 × tan ( 22.9 )=245.55 KN =246 KN .
Determining the vertical force acting on the rest of the vertical Glulam Chords:
-Using similar triangles approach and the shear force diagram, we can estimate the
vertical forces acting on the Vertical Glulam Chords.
4
The University of Sheffield
Department of Civil and Structural Engineering
Module: CIV3203 Prepared by:
Ellia Halaseh
Date:
07/05/2024
Reference Calculation Output
( )( ) (
Fv 2
876
=
19
25
→
25 Fv 2
25
= )(
876 ×19
25 )
→ Fv 2=665.76 KN =666 KN .
5
The University of Sheffield
Department of Civil and Structural Engineering
Module: CIV3203 Prepared by:
Ellia Halaseh
Date:
07/05/2024
Reference Calculation Output
(
- (Lef, y)/h: 6.53 ÷ )
320
1000
=20.40625
-kc, y: 0.66
-ksys: 1
-kmod: 0.8
-yM: 1.25
-fc, 0, k: 28 N/mm2.
1× 0.8 ×28 2
-fc, 0, d: =17.92 N /mm .
1.25
(666 ×1000
320 ×320 )
÷ ( 0.66 ×17.92 )=0.5499 ≤1 → passes the ¿ˇ .
( )
- (Lef, y)/h: 8.25 ÷
320
1000
=25.78125
-kc, y: 0.45
-ksys: 1
-kmod: 0.8
-yM: 1.25
6
The University of Sheffield
Department of Civil and Structural Engineering
Module: CIV3203 Prepared by:
Ellia Halaseh
Date:
07/05/2024
Reference Calculation Output
-fc, 0, k: 28 N/mm2.
1× 0.8 ×28 2
- fc, 0, d: =17.92 N /mm .
1.25
( 474 × 1000
320 ×320 )
÷ ( 0.45 ×17.92 )=0.574 ≤1 → passes the ¿ˇ .
-kc, y: 0.34
-ksys: 1
-kmod: 0.8
-yM: 1.25
-fc, 0, k: 28 N/mm2.
1× 0.8 ×28 2
- fc, 0, d: =17.92 N /mm .
1.25
(298 ×1000
320 ×320 )
÷ ( 0.34 × 17.92 )=0.477 ≤ 1→ passesthe ¿ˇ
-kc, y: 0.32
-ksys: 1
-kmod: 0.8
-yM: 1.25
-fc, 0, k: 28 N/mm2.
7
The University of Sheffield
Department of Civil and Structural Engineering
Module: CIV3203 Prepared by:
Ellia Halaseh
Date:
07/05/2024
Reference Calculation Output
1× 0.8 ×28 2
- fc, 0, d: =17.92 N /mm .
1.25
(141× 1000
320× 320 )
÷ ( 0.32× 17.92 )=0.241 ≤1 → passes the ¿ˇ .
8
The University of Sheffield
Department of Civil and Structural Engineering
Module: CIV3203 Prepared by:
Ellia Halaseh
Date:
07/05/2024
Reference Calculation Output
-Assume for the initial sizing that they have the same as the vertical Glulam Chord,
GL28h, 320 mm.
Top Arched Glulam Chord, and Steel Cable (Member in Compression, while for
the Steel Cable in Tension):
-L: 50 m.
-h: 10 m
-w: 18.6 KN/m.
( )( )
2 2
w× L 18.6 ×50
-Rh: = =581.25 KN .
8h 8× 10
-Multiply the Areq by 0.8 to account for the space in the Steel Cables.
9
The University of Sheffield
Department of Civil and Structural Engineering
Module: CIV3203 Prepared by:
Ellia Halaseh
Date:
07/05/2024
Reference Calculation Output
-Size of Steel Cables (VVS-3): 55 mm (Minimum Breaking Load of 3020 KN).
-Assume for the initial sizing that it is the same as the Bottom Glulam Chords.
-Size of Chords Connecting Vertical Elements (GL28h): (520 X 200) mm.
Bracings:
-According to the Dynamic Analysis done in GSA, it turns out that columns supporting the
truss bridge needs to be stiffer as it exceeds the maximum allowable deflection of 15mm,
in order to mitigate this issue, I tried to increase the section of the timber column but
that did not work as well. Hence, I decided to change the section into a steel column.
1 1
-Design Value of Compression Force (NEd): F v = × wl= × 37.2× 50=465 KN .
4 4
2
-fy: 355 N/mm .
-Trial Column Size: 203 x 203 x 71 (British Steel Universal Columns).
-web(c/t): 15.6 (Section Class 1).
-Flange (c/t): 5.97 (Section Class 1).
-Overall Section Class : 1
10
The University of Sheffield
Department of Civil and Structural Engineering
Module: CIV3203 Prepared by:
Ellia Halaseh
Date:
07/05/2024
Reference Calculation Output
N Ed
[ ( )] [ ( )]
N b , y, Rd
+ K yy
M y , Ed
M b , Rd
+ K yz ×
M z , Ed
M c , z , Rd
≤1.0
-Ψ: -1
-Cmy: 0.6+ 0.4 Ψ ≥ 0.4=0.6+ ( 0.4 ×−1 )=0.2 ≥ 0.4 → Cmy = 0.4
N Ed 465
- = =0.182
N b , y, Rd 2555
Lcr 4500
-Non-dimensional Slenderness, λy: = =1.1214
76 ×i y 76 × 52.8
K yy
- =1.17
Cmy
K yy
-Kyy: C my × =0.4 ×1.17=0.468
C my
N Ed
N b , y, Rd[ ( )]
+ K yy ×
M y , Ed
M b , Rd (
+ ⌈ K yz ×
M z , Ed
)
M c, z , Rd
⌉ ≤ 1.0=
[465
2555 (
+ 0.468 ×)]
83.90
276
+0=0.3243 ≤ 1.0→
11
The University of Sheffield
Department of Civil and Structural Engineering
Module: CIV3203 Prepared by:
Ellia Halaseh
Date:
07/05/2024
Reference Calculation Output
Therefore passes the check (Section is Sufficient).
N Ed
[ ( )] [ ( )]
N b , z , Rd
+ K zy
M y , Ed
M b , Rd
+ K zz ×
M z , Ed
M c , z , Rd
≤ 1.0
-To Find Kzy: → 1- Either Member Not Susceptible to Torsional Deformation, 0.6 Kyy.
2- Or, Member Susceptible to Torsional Deformation, Figure D.3 From
p362 concise EC3, 2017 Edition.
-Kzy: 0.974
-My,Ed: 83.90 KNm (Myy from the GSA software).
-C1: 2.50
-Mb,Rd: 276 KNm (From the Blue Book).
N Ed
[ ( )]
N b , z , Rd
+ K zy ×
M y , Ed
M b , Rd (
+ ⌈ K zz ×
M z , Ed
)
M c , z , Rd
⌉ ≤ 1.0=
[465
1530 (
+ 0.974 × )]
83.90
276
+0=0.6 ≤1.0 →
-Altitude of The Site Above Ordnance Datum (A): 53.262 m (From Borehole Data).
12
The University of Sheffield
Department of Civil and Structural Engineering
Module: CIV3203 Prepared by:
Ellia Halaseh
Date:
07/05/2024
Reference Calculation Output
- For Initial design assume the AG1 site is not shielded from the wind by adjacent
buildings, Conservative Assumption.
-Displacement Height (hdis): 0 m.
-Distance from Lowest Ground Level to the Bottom of the Bridge Deck: 4.5 m
-Bridge Deck Structure Depth (d): (160 + 200) = 360 mm (Includes the Depth of CLT Deck
and the Bottom Glulam Chords).
13
The University of Sheffield
Department of Civil and Structural Engineering
Module: CIV3203 Prepared by:
Ellia Halaseh
Date:
07/05/2024
Reference Calculation Output
-z: 4.68 m.
-Distance Upwind to Shoreline: 100 Km.
-Exposure Factor (Ce(Z)): 1.8 (UK National Annex, Figure NA.7).
-Bridge Width (b): 4 m.
-BS EN 1991-1-4 Specifies that for a Truss Bridge, The Wind Force in the Y-Direction can
be taken as 50% of the Wind Force in the X-Direction.
14
The University of Sheffield
Department of Civil and Structural Engineering
Module: CIV3203 Prepared by:
Ellia Halaseh
Date:
07/05/2024
Reference Calculation Output
15