Output
Output
Output
Project Report
Submitted for the Degree of B.Com.Honours in Accounting &
Finance under the University of Calcutta
:Submitted by:
Name of Candidate:
Registration no:
Roll no:
Name of College:
:Supervised by:
Name of the Supervisor:
Name of the College:
Submitted in the year:
1
lOMoARcPSD|25619081
It is a matter of great pleasure for me in submitting the project report on “Working Capital
Management”- A Case Study of CEAT Company Ltd. for the fulfillment of the degree of
B.Com Honours in Accounting & Finance under the University of Calcutta.
I am thankful to and owe a deep dept gratitude to all those who have helped me in preparing this
report. Words seem to be inadequate to express my sincere thanks to our honourable principal
__________ , as well as our head of department honourable __________ and finally my
supervisor ______________ for his valuable guidance, constructive criticism, untiring efforts and
immense encouragement during the entire course of the study due to which my efforts have been
rewarded.
I want to thank all who have supported me and gave their timely guidance. Last but not the least I
am very grateful to all those who helped me in one-way or the other way at every stage of my work.
2
lOMoARcPSD|25619081
I also declare that no chapter if this manuscript in whole or in part has been incorporated in
this report from any earlier work done by others of by me. However, extracts of any literature
which has been used for this report has been duly acknowledged providing details of such
literature in the references.
Place: Signature:
Date: Name:
Address:
Reg. No:
Roll No:
3
lOMoARcPSD|25619081
Supervisor's Certificate
Downloaded by Sayan bhowmik 50 ([email protected])
This is to certify that Mr. _________ a student of B.Com Honours in Accounting & Finance of
___________ College under the University of Calcutta has worked under my supervision and
guidance for his Project Work and prepared a Project Report with the title “Working Capital
Management”- A Case Study of CEAT Company Ltd.
The Project Report, which he is submitted, is his genuine and original work to the best of my
knowledge.
Place: Signature:
Date: Prof. ____________
(Professor in commerce)
College
4
lOMoARcPSD|25619081
TABLE OF CONTENT
SL. No. Particulars Page No.
1 Introduction
Downloaded by Sayan bhowmik 50 ([email protected])
1.1 Background of Study 6
1.2 Literature review 6-7
1.3 Research Gap 7
1.4Objective of Study 7-8
1.5 Research Methodology 8
1.6 Limitations of Study 8-9
1.7 Chapter Planning 9
2 Conceptual Framework
2.1 Concept 10-11
2.2 Company Profile 11-12
2.3 Industry Profile 12-13
2.4 National Scenario 13-14
2.5 International Scenario 14
3 Presentation & Analysis of Data
3.1 Current Ratio 15-16
3.2 Quick/Liquid/Acid Test Ratio 16-17
3.3 Inventory Turnover Ratio 17-19
3.4 Debtors/Receivables Turnover Ratio 19-20
3.5 Creditors/Payables Turnover Ratio 21-22
3.6 Cash/Super Quick Ratio 22-23
3.7 Working Capital Turnover Ratio 23-24
4 Findings & Conclusion 25-27
BIBLIOGRAPHY 28
Annexure-1 29-30
Annexure-2 31-32
5
lOMoARcPSD|25619081
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background of Study
Working capital management plays an important role in financial management of the industry.
Numbers of researcher has been done the research on different components of working capital and
subjects on. Here, I have included the relevant articles as well research work on the same topic.
And this is a part of my research work on the same title the working capital management of selected
tyre companies of India. The main aim of this paper is to identify the gaps in current body of my
research work which gives the direction towards forward attention to be given.
(a)NCEAR (1966):-
The National Council of applied Economic Research (NCEAR) in 1966 first time formal study was
conducted on working capital management in India. The council published a structure of working
capital" which was limited analysis of the creation of working capital with special attention to the
fertilizers, and cement and sugar industries the main objective of this study was emphasized on
come out with findings that working capital management practices were extremely unplanned
and hence need to develop proper accounting policies like inventory management, debtors
management as above. And the study suggested developing suitable working capital policies
required in the success of business.
6
lOMoARcPSD|25619081
(b)Kushwah, Mathur&Ball(2009):-
The study undergone to evaluate the working capital management and direction in selected five
major cement companies i.e. ACC, Grasim, Ambuja, Prism and Ultra- Tech.. For the research
purpose secondary data are used like authors collected the financial statement of selected
Downloaded by Sayan bhowmik 50 ([email protected])
cements companies for the years from 2007 to 2009. There is liquidity ratios and activities ratios
are used to analyse the condition of working capital of the companies. The study revealed the truth
of study is that, most companies not maintain their working capital in a systematic way while
overall ACC shows appropriate management of working capital.
(c)Madhavi K. (2014):-
She has done research based on empirical study of co relation among liquidity position an
profitability of the paper mills in Andhra Pradesh. That has been evaluated ineffective working
capital negatively effect on profitability of the paper mills.
From the above it is seen that previously no one has reviewed on this topic “Working Capital
Management” of my selected company “CEAT Company Ltd.” since last five years(March 2017 to
March 2021).
So, I have choose this above mentioned topic and Company with last five years data to done my
project work.
7
lOMoARcPSD|25619081
(e) Tools used- The different tools used for analysis are tables charts & diagrams.
1.6Limitations of Study
(a) Limited Data- This project depends on only secondary data. Due to lack of time it is
impossible to collect the primary data.
(b) Limited Period- This project is based on five year annual reports. Conclusions are based
on such limited data.
(c) Cost Involved- Due to cost involved is carrying out a project we could not carry out
intensive analysis as well as collection for data this might restrict our study to same
extent.
8
lOMoARcPSD|25619081
1. Chapter 1: Introduction
This chapter includes Background of Study, Literature review, Research gap, Objective of
Study, Research Methodology, Limitations of Study, Chapter Planning.
9
lOMoARcPSD|25619081
CHAPTER 2: CONCEPTUALFRAMEWORK
2.1 Concept
10
lOMoARcPSD|25619081
CEAT Limited (formerly, Cavi Elettrici e Affini Torino) is an Indian multinational tyre
manufacturing company owned by the RPG Group. It was established in 1924 in Turin, Italy. As of
date, CEAT is one of India's leading tyre manufacturers and has a presence in global markets.
CEAT produces over 165 million tyres a year and manufactures tyres for passenger cars, two-
wheelers, trucks and buses, light commercial vehicles, earth-movers, forklifts, tractors, trailers, and
auto-rickshaws. The current capacity of CEAT tyres' plants is over 800 tonnes per day.
▪
History
The Company was founded as Cavi Elettrici e Affini Torino (Electrical Cables and Allied
Products of Turin) by Virginio Bruni Tedeschi in 1924, in Turin, Italy. On 10 March 1958, the
company was incorporated as CEAT Tyres of India, in Mumbai. Initially, the company
collaborated with the Tata Group. In1972, the company set up a research and development unit at
Bhandup. In 1981, Deccan Fibre Glass Limited was merged with the company. In 1982, RPG
Group acquired the company, and in 1990, the company was renamed as CEAT. In 1993, the
company collaborated with Yokohama Rubber Company, to manufacture radial tyres at their
Nashik unit. In 1999, CEAT formed a joint venture, named as CEAT Kelani, with Asia Motor
Works (AMW) and Kelani Tyres, to manufacture and market CEAT tyres inSri Lanka. in 2006,
CEAT Kelani commissioned their first SriLanka-based radial-tyre manufacturing unit in
Kalutara.[13] In2009, AMW exited the joint-venture.
11
lOMoARcPSD|25619081
▪
Products
CEAT manufactures tyres for various types of vehicles like heavy commercial vehicle, light
commercial vehicle, off-highway tryes, passenger cars, tractors, motorcycles and scooters, cycles
and SUVs. It exports to countries across the Africa, Americas, Australia, and Asia.
The Indian Tyre Industry is an integral part of the Auto Sector – It contributes to ~3% of the
manufacturing GDP of India and ~0.5% of the total GDP directly. So, let’s understand the
dynamics of the Tyre Industry in India.
Indian tyre industry has almost doubled from ~Rs 30,000 crores in 2010-11 to ~Rs 59,500 crores in
2017-18 of which 90-95% came from the domestic markets. The top three companies – MRF,
Apollo Tyres and JK Tyres have ~60% of the market share in terms of revenue. In terms of
segmentation tyres can be divided in two ways – based on end market and based on product.
Indian tyre market is clearly skewed towards the replacement segment which contributes ~70% of
total revenues. Whereas in volume (tonnage) terms the replacement segment contributes ~60%
12
lOMoARcPSD|25619081
indicating realizations in the after-market are clearly higher than OEMs (Original Equipment
Manufacturer) market.
Based On Products
Truck & Bus (T&B), Passenger Vehicle (PV), 2/3-Wheeler, Off-Highway Tyres (OHT) &
Others
CEAT is one of the most respected and widely renowned brands in the Indian tyre market. In FY
20, it reported a consolidated net revenue from operations of Rs. 6,77,883 Lacs, degrowth
13
lOMoARcPSD|25619081
by 2.94% Y-o-Y. Revenue contribution from 2-Wheeler, Passenger Vehicles and Off-
Highway tyre has increased significantly over the years, from 20% in FY 10 to 52% in FY 20.
The Government announced allocation of Rs. 1,70,000 Crores for investments in
transportation infrastructure in FY 21. This move is expected to improve road network,
eventually benefitting automobile manufacturers and tyre suppliers.
CEAT is one of the major exporters among Indias’ tyre manufacturers with sales to 100+
countries worldwide.The revenues from exports have increased steadily over the past few years.
CEAT has a stratified export market divided in seven clusters. This identification of clusters has
helped CEAT better understand customer requirements and accordingly invest in R&D to
developmarket - specific products. CEAT continues to consolidate its position in Bangladesh and
Sri Lanka through Joint Ventures (JVs) with strategic partners. CEATs core focus areas and
growth drivers are the Two-wheeler, Passenger Car Radial and TBR tyre segments. CEAT
continues to focus on European markets to expand its footprint.
Currency fluctuation destabilising International business existing markets in FY 20, CEAT has
entered the markets of Australia, UK, Belgium, Brazil, Chile and Nicaragua with its
passenger car products. CEAT has also entered the US market with the products in Truck Radial
segment. CEAT launched its 2-Wheeler products in Nigeria which is the worlds largest
consumption market for 2-Wheeler.
CEATs product series in the Passenger Car, Winter, Summer, All-Season, Ultra High
Performance (UHP) and Van categories launched in Europe have met the stringent performance
requirements of European markets. CEAT is well-placed to maximise available opportunities to
become one of the leading players in the global market with its high-range of premium products.
14
lOMoARcPSD|25619081
• Total Current Assest= (Current Investments + Inventories + Trade Receivables + Cash &
Cash Equivalent + Short Term Loans And Advances + Other Current Assets)
• Total Current Liabilities= (Short Term Borrowings + Trade Payables + Other Current
Liabilities + Short Term Provisions)
Mar'17
Mar'18
Mar'19
Mar'20
Mar'21
Current Ratio
15
lOMoARcPSD|25619081
Interpretation:-
Current Ratio indicates Company’s ability to payment short term liability. The Standard Current
Ratio is 2:1. On the basis of company’s current ratio from March 2017 to 2021, we see it does not
satisfy the ideal ratio (2:1). We also see it continuously decreasing from 2018 – 2021
The quick ratio also known as liquid ratio is an indicator of a company’s short-
term liquidity position and measures a company’s ability to meet its short-term obligations with its
most liquid assets. Since it indicates the company’s ability to instantly use its near-cash assets
(assets that can be converted quickly to cash) to pay down its current liabilities, it is also called the
acid test ratio. An "acid test" is a slang term for a quick test designed to produce instant results. The
ideal Quick ratio is 1:1.
16
lOMoARcPSD|25619081
Quick/Liquid Ratio
Interpretation:-
Quick ratio indicates company’s ability to pay immediate short term due & capacity for day to day
expenses. Here we see that on the basis of company’s quick ratio from March 2017 to March 2021,
it does not satisfy the ideal ratio (1:1). We also see it continuously decreasing from 2018 – 2021
compared to 2017. It indicates company is unable to pay its short term liability & day to day
expenses in future.
Inventory turnover is the rate at which a company replaces inventory in a given period due to sales.
Calculating inventory turnover helps businesses make better pricing, manufacturing,
marketing, and purchasing decisions. Well-managed inventory levels show that a company's
sales are at the desired level, and costs are controlled. The inventory turnover ratio is a measure of
how well a company generates sales from its inventory.
17
lOMoARcPSD|25619081
• Gross Profit= Revenue From Operations (Net) – Cost of Materials Consumed – Purchase of
Stock-In-Trade – Changes In Inventories of FG, WIP and Stock-In- Trade.
Mar'2017
Mar'2018
Mar'2019
Mar'2020
Mar'2021
18
lOMoARcPSD|25619081
Interpretation:-
Inventory turnover ratio indicates inventory holding period. It also indicate efficiency in
inventory management. If inventory turnover ratio is high, it means inventory holding period is
Downloaded by Sayan bhowmik 50 ([email protected])
very low which is good for a company and vice versa. Here we see that the Inventory Turnover
Ratio of the company is an increasing trend from the year March 2017 to March 2019. But in the
year March 2020 there is a decreasing trend and finally in the year March 2021 there is an
increasing trend.
The debtors turnover ratio also known as receivables turnover ratio is an accounting measure used
to quantify a company's effectiveness in collecting its accounts receivable, or the money owed by
customers or clients. This ratio measures how well a company uses and manages the credit it
extends to customers and how quickly that short-term debt is collected or is paid. A firm that is
efficient at collecting on its payments due will have a higher accounts receivable turnover ratio. It is
useful to compare a firm's ratio with that of its peers in the same industry to gauge whether it is
on par with its competitors. A high debtors turnover ratio may indicate an improvement in
business conditions, a tightening of credit policies, or improved collection procedures. A low
ratio may be an indication of long credit period or slow realisation from debtors.
19
lOMoARcPSD|25619081
Rs. i
Mar'2017
Mar'2018
Mar'2019
Mar'2020
Mar'2021
Interpretation:-
Debtors Turnover Ratio indicates the number of times per year that the average balance of debtors
are collected. Here we see that the Debtors/Receivables Turnover Ratio of the company is a
decreasing trend in the year March 2018 compared to the year March 2017 and after that a very low
increasing trend in the year March 2019 compared to the year March 2018 and again it decreased in
the next year and finally it again increasing trend it the year March 2021 compared to the year
March 2020.It indicates company’s collection period from debtors are quite satisfying.
20
lOMoARcPSD|25619081
Mar'2017
Mar'2018
Mar'2019
Mar'2020
Mar'2021
lOMoARcPSD|25619081
The cash ratio also known as Super Quick Ratio is a measurement of a company's liquidity,
specifically the ratio of a company's total cash and cash equivalents to its current liabilities. The
metric calculates a company's ability to repay its short-term debt with cash or near-cash
resources, such as easily marketable securities. This information is useful to creditors when they
decide how much money, if any, they would be willing to loan a company. The cash ratio is almost
like an indicator of a firm’s value under the worst-case scenario—say, where the company
is about to go out of business. It tells creditors and analysts the value of current assets that
could quickly be turned into cash, and what percentage of the company’s current liabilities these
cash and near-cash assets could cover.
Cash & ℎ
𝐸𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑡 + Cash/Super Quick Ratio =
Current Liabilities
Year Mar'2017 Mar'2018 Mar'2019 Mar'202
Cash & Cash Equivalent (A) 17.47 73.01 59.74 26.59
Marketable Securities (B) 0 0 0 0
n cr Current Liabilities (C) 1337.61 1736.51 2058.95 2151.86
Cash/Super Quick Ratio (A+B/C=D) 0.01 0.04 0.03 0.01
Rs. i
22
lOMoARcPSD|25619081
Interpretation:-
Higher the super quick/cash ratio better the liquidity condition of a business. In the above case for
every 1 unit of current liability, the company has on an average only 0.02 units of super quick
assets, which is very bad for the company.
Working capital turnover is a ratio that measures how efficiently a company is using its working
capital to support sales and growth. Also known as net sales to working capital, working capital
turnover measures the relationship between the funds used to finance a company's operations and
the revenues a company generates to continue operations and turn a profit.
A high turnover ratio shows that management is being very efficient in using a company’s short-
term assets and liabilities for supporting sales. In other words, it is generating a higher dollar
amount of sales for every dollar of working capital used.
In contrast, a low ratio may indicate that a business is investing in too many accounts
receivable and inventory to support its sales, which could lead to an excessive amount of bad debts
or obsolete inventory.
23
lOMoARcPSD|25619081
• Net Revenue From Operations= Gross Revenue From Operations – Excise/Service Tax/Other Levies
• Working Capital= Total Current Assets – Total Current Liabilities
Year Mar'2017 Mar'2018 Mar'2019 Mar'2020 Mar'2021
Net Revenue From Operations (A) 5658.25 6075.37 6800.06 6518.57 7572.7
Total Current Assets (B) 1823.57 1748.08 1964.68 1795.42 2184.0
Total Current Liabilities (C) 1337.61 1736.51 2058.95 2151.86 3009.1
Rs. i n cr
Interpretation:-
From the above we can see that the amount of sales gradually increases except in the year March
2020. But the Working Capital of the company was decreasing in a high rate and it goes to negative.
We also see that the working capital turnover ratio increasing trend in the year March 2018 compared
to the year March 2017 and after that there is a huge decreasing trend and it goes to a negative ratio in
the year March 2019 compared to the year March 2018 but in the next two years(i.e., March 2020 &
March 2021) it increases but the ratio is negative.
24
lOMoARcPSD|25619081
4.1 Findings:-
Working Capital is the life line of every Industry, irrespective of whether it’s a manufacturing
industry or service industry. Working Capital is the prime and most important requirement for
carrying out the day operations of the business. Working capital gives the much needed liquidity to
the business. Working Capital finance reduces the overall fund requirement, required to build up
the current assets, which in turn help you improve your turnover ratio.
In this project we have studied “Working Capital Management”- A Case Study of CEAT
Company Ltd.
✓
The inventory turnover ratio, which shows a quite good performance for the
company. From the Inventory Turnover Ratio we can see that the inventory are
replaced on an average 83 days interval. We can surely say that the companies having
good inventories turnover ratio understudy.
25
lOMoARcPSD|25619081
• The debtor’s turnover ratio is used for efficiency of the company. A high debtors
turnover ratio is good for any company. Here we can see that the Debtors Turnover
✓
A high working capital turnover ratio shows that management is being very
efficient in using a company’s short-term assets and liabilities for supporting sales. In
other words, it is generating a higher dollar amount of sales for every dollar of
working capital used. In contrast, a low ratio may indicate that a business is
investing in too many accounts receivable and inventory to support its sales, which
could lead to an excessive amount of bad debts or obsolete inventory. From the study
here we can see that this ratio is in much good position for the first year (i.e., March
2017) and in very good position in the next year (i.e., March 2018) and rest years in a
very bad position.
26
lOMoARcPSD|25619081
4.2 Conclusion:-
In this project “Working Capital Management”- A Case Study of CEAT Company Ltd. , which
is one of the most important aspects of any organization, as it deals in managing the entire current
assets and current liabilities. After analyzing the financial statement and having a in- depth study of
various ratio of the company we conclude that the management of capital requires an evaluation of
cost and benefits associated with each elements. CEAT maintains sound position of working capital
27
lOMoARcPSD|25619081
BIBLIOGRAPHY
▪ Website reference:-
1. www.google.com
2. www.moneycontrol.com
3. www.investopedia.com
4. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CEAT_(company)
5. https://www.indiainfoline.com/company/ceat-ltd-management/management-
discussions/104
6. https://www.alphainvesco.com/blog/understanding-the-indian-tyre-industry/
28
lOMoARcPSD|25619081
Annexure-1
CEAT
Standalone Balance Sheet in Rs. Cr.
29
lOMoARcPSD|25619081
CURRENT ASSETS
Current Investments 0 0 0 40.06 64.27
Inventories 1,112.50 879.5 965.15 754.96 923.44
Trade Receivables 922.26 704.66 726.46 712.15 592.05
Cash And Cash Equivalents 25.51 26.59 59.74 73.01 17.47
Short Term Loans And Advances 0 50.32 58 49.02 50.02
OtherCurrentAssets 123.81 134.35 155.33 118.88 176.32
Total Current Assets 2,184.08 1,795.42 1,964.68 1,748.08 1,823.57
Total Assets 7,905.02 6,945.02 6,061.86 4,780.49 4,543.20
NON-CURRENT INVESTMENTS
CURRENT INVESTMENTS
30
lOMoARcPSD|25619081
Annexure-2
CEAT
Standalone Profit & Loss account in Rs. Cr.
INCOME
6,518.5 6,800.0 6,244.2 6,333.0
Revenue From Operations [Gross] 7,572.79
7 6 8 4
Less: Excise/Service Tax/Other Levies 0 0 0 168.91 674.79
6,518.5 6,800.0 6,075.3 5,658.2
Revenue From Operations [Net] 7,572.79
7 6 7 5
Other Operating Revenues 0 62.54 31.24 85.97 43.48
6,581.1 6,831.3 6,161.3 5,701.7
Total Operating Revenues 7,572.79
1 0 4 3
Other Income 31.8 41.34 55.3 56.81 41.46
6,622.4 6,886.6 6,218.1 5,743.1
Total Revenue 7,604.59
5 0 5 9
EXPENSES
3,815.9 4,273.6 3,650.3 3,308.8
Cost Of Materials Consumed 4,173.76
7 4 3 8
Purchase Of Stock-In Trade 10.09 21.2 60.92 59.88 142.55
Changes In Inventories Of FG,WIP And Stock-In Trade 67.43 14.58 -194.25 93.32 -76.15
Employee Benefit Expenses 667.13 500.54 491.95 413.11 383.85
Finance Costs 173.05 122.96 64.52 86.45 79.47
Depreciation And Amortisation Expenses 339.58 255.4 174.3 161.68 142.01
1,523.5 1,561.5 1,317.3 1,282.6
Other Expenses 1,680.59
2 1 2 0
6,254.1 6,432.5 5,782.0 5,263.2
Total Expenses 7,111.63
7 9 9 1
Mar-21 Mar-20 Mar-19 Mar-18 Mar-17
31
lOMoARcPSD|25619081
32