Scribd
Upload
6 views

Class Notes2

The document discusses 10 common wait events in databases and provides explanations and potential solutions for each one. The wait events covered are DB file scattered read, DB file sequential read, free buffer, buffer busy, latch free, enqueue, log buffer space, log file switch, log file sync, and idle event.

Uploaded by

kuttu4466
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
6 views

Class Notes2

The document discusses 10 common wait events in databases and provides explanations and potential solutions for each one. The wait events covered are DB file scattered read, DB file sequential read, free buffer, buffer busy, latch free, enqueue, log buffer space, log file switch, log file sync, and idle event.

Uploaded by

kuttu4466
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Resolving Your Wait EventsThe following are 10 of the most common

causes for wait events, along with explanations and potential solutions:

1. DB File Scattered ReadThis generally indicates waits related to full table


scans. As full table scans are pulled into memory, they rarely fall into contiguous
buffers but instead are scattered throughout the buffer cache. A large number here
indicates that your table may have missing or suppressed indexes. Although it may
be more efficient in your situation to perform a full table scan than an index scan,
check to ensure that full table scans are necessary when you see these waits. Try to
cache small tables to avoid reading them in over and over again, since a full table
scan is put at the cold end of the LRU (Least Recently Used) list.

2. DB File Sequential ReadThis event generally indicates a single block read (an
index read, for example). A large number of waits here could indicate poor joining
orders of tables, or unselective indexing. It is normal for this number to be large
for a high-transaction, well-tuned system, but it can indicate problems in some
circumstances. You should correlate this wait statistic with other known issues within
the Statspack report, such as inefficient SQL. Check to ensure that index scans are
necessary, and check join orders for multiple table joins. The DB_CACHE_SIZE will
also be a determining factor in how often these waits show up. Problematic hash-
area joins should show up in the PGA memory, but they're also memory hogs that
could cause high wait numbers for sequential reads. They can also show up as direct
path read/write waits.

3. Free BufferThis indicates your system is waiting for a buffer in memory, because
none is currently available. Waits in this category may indicate that you need to
increase the DB_BUFFER_CACHE, if all your SQL is tuned. Free buffer waits could
also indicate that unselective SQL is causing data to flood the buffer cache with index
blocks, leaving none for this particular statement that is waiting for the system to
process. This normally indicates that there is a substantial amount of DML
(insert/update/delete) being done and that the Database Writer (DBWR) is not
writing quickly enough; the buffer cache could be full of multiple versions of the
same buffer, causing great inefficiency. To address this, you may want to consider
accelerating incremental checkpointing, using more DBWR processes, or
increasing the number of physical disks.

4. Buffer BusyThis is a wait for a buffer that is being used in an unshareable way or
is being read into the buffer cache. Buffer busy waits should not be greater
than 1 percent. Check the Buffer Wait Statistics section (or V$WAITSTAT) to find
out if the wait is on a segment header. If this is the case, increase the freelist groups
or increase the pctused to pctfree gap. If the wait is on an undo header, you can
address this by adding rollback segments; if it's on an undo block, you need to
reduce the data density on the table driving this consistent read or increase the
DB_CACHE_SIZE. If the wait is on a data block, you can move data to another block
to avoid this hot block, increase the freelists on the table, or use Locally Managed
Tablespaces (LMTs). If it's on an index block, you should rebuild the index, partition
the index, or use a reverse key index. To prevent buffer busy waits related to data
blocks, you can also use a smaller block size: fewer records fall within a single block
in this case, so it's not as "hot." When a DML (insert/update/ delete) occurs, Oracle
Database writes information into the block, including all users who are "interested" in
the state of the block (Interested Transaction List, ITL). To decrease waits in this
area, you can increase the initrans, which will create the space in the block to allow
multiple ITL slots. You can also increase the pctfree on the table where this block
exists (this writes the ITL information up to the number specified by maxtrans, when
there are not enough slots built with the initrans that is specified).

5. Latch FreeLatches are low-level queuing mechanisms (they're accurately referred


to as mutual exclusion mechanisms) used to protect shared memory structures in
the system global area (SGA). Latches are like locks on memory that are very
quickly obtained and released. Latches are used to prevent concurrent access to a
shared memory structure. If the latch is not available, a latch free miss is recorded.
Most latch problems are related to the failure to use bind variables (library cache
latch), redo generation issues (redo allocation latch), buffer cache contention issues
(cache buffers LRU chain), and hot blocks in the buffer cache (cache buffers chain).
There are also latch waits related to bugs; check MetaLink for bug reports if you
suspect this is the case. When latch miss ratios are greater than 0.5 percent, you
should investigate the issue.

6. Enqueue

An enqueue is a lock that protects a shared resource. Locks protect shared


resources, such as data in a record, to prevent two people from updating the same
data at the same time. An enqueue includes a queuing mechanism, which is FIFO
(first in, first out). Note that Oracle's latching mechanism is not FIFO. Enqueue waits
usually point to the ST enqueue, the HW enqueue, the TX4 enqueue, and the TM
enqueue. The ST enqueue is used for space management and allocation for
dictionary-managed tablespaces. Use LMTs, or try to preallocate extents or at least
make the next extent larger for problematic dictionary-managed tablespaces. HW
enqueues are used with the high-water mark of a segment; manually allocating the
extents can circumvent this wait. TX4s are the most common enqueue waits. TX4
enqueue waits are usually the result of one of three issues. The first issue is
duplicates in a unique index; you need to commit/rollback to free the enqueue. The
second is multiple updates to the same bitmap index fragment. Since a single bitmap
fragment may contain multiple rowids, you need to issue a commit or rollback to free
the enqueue when multiple users are trying to update the same fragment. The third
and most likely issue is when multiple users are updating the same block. If there
are no free ITL slots, a block-level lock could occur. You can easily avoid this
scenario by increasing the initrans and/or maxtrans to allow multiple ITL slots and/or
by increasing the pctfree on the table. Finally, TM enqueues occur during DML to
prevent DDL to the affected object. If you have foreign keys, be sure to index them
to avoid this general locking issue.

7. Log Buffer SpaceThis wait occurs because you are writing the log buffer faster
than LGWR can write it to the redo logs, or because log switches are too slow. To
address this problem, increase the size of the log files, or increase the size of the log
buffer, or get faster disks to write to. You might even consider using solid-state
disks, for their high speed.

8. Log File SwitchAll commit requests are waiting for "logfile switch (archiving
needed)" or "logfile switch (chkpt. Incomplete)." Ensure that the archive disk is not
full or slow. DBWR may be too slow because of I/O. You may need to add more or
larger redo logs, and you may potentially need to add database writers if the DBWR
is the problem.
9. Log File Sync.When a user commits or rolls back data, the LGWR flushes the
session's redo from the log buffer to the redo logs. The log file sync process must
wait for this to successfully complete. To reduce wait events here, try to commit
more records (try to commit a batch of 50 instead of one at a time, for example).
Put redo logs on a faster disk, or alternate redo logs on different physical disks, to
reduce the archiving effect on LGWR. Don't use RAID 5, since it is very slow for
applications that write a lot; potentially consider using file system direct I/O or raw
devices, which are very fast at writing information.

10. Idle Event.There are several idle wait events listed after the output; you can
ignore them. Idle events are generally listed at the bottom of each section and
include such things as SQL*Net message to/from client and other background-
related timings. Idle events are listed in the stats$idle_event table.

You might also like