11468-Article Text - Manuscript-32620-2-10-20170707
11468-Article Text - Manuscript-32620-2-10-20170707
11468-Article Text - Manuscript-32620-2-10-20170707
11468
2017, DESIDOC
Abstract
The ultimate goal of armour research is to create better armour for battle worthy combat plat forms such as main
battle tanks, infantry combat vehicles and light combat vehicles. In each of these applications, the main aim boils
down to one of the two things; either reduce the weight without sacrificing protection or enhance the performance
at same or even reduced weight. In practice, these ambitions can be fulfilled only if we have with us, appropriate
improved armour materials, advanced and innovative technologies and also improved designs, which enable us to
use them for creating next generation armour modules. Armour systems have progressed through improvements in
metallic, ceramic and lightweight (low areal density) composite materials. Similarly, the advances in development
of explosive reactive armour (ERA) and non-explosive reactive armour (NERA) have generated efficient armour
system against contemporary high explosive antitank ammunition and missile threats for the armoured vehicles.
Yet, to achieve armour performance exceeding that of the current light combat vehicles and main battle tanks,
further advancements in armour materials, systems, and survivability technologies are required for new vehicular
systems that weigh significantly less than the present combat platforms. Various approaches and advancements in
the metallic and composite armour materials, ERA and NERA systems to improve the survivability of armoured
vehicles in the futuristic multi-spectral battlefield scenarios are described.
Keywords: Steel armour; Composite materials; Combat vehicles; Bulging armour; Reactive protection system
412
singh, et al.: Future Armour Materials and Technologies for Combat Platforms
3. Medium hardness Armour Steel around 450 VHN coupled with good impact toughness. The
The development of medium hardness steel essentially mechanical properties of the steel in the as-received condition
focused on selection of suitable heat treatment cycles on are compared with the mechanical properties of the steel in the
rolled homogeneous armour (RHA) steel (Table 1) in order to modified tempering condition in Table 2. It can be observed
obtain medium hardness with improved ballistic properties and that there is a considerable increase in the yield strength and
without any cracking tendencies. This approach has advantage ultimate tensile strength of the steel at the cost of little ductility
of using existing steel and existing production infrastructure in comparison to the presently used RHA steel by adopting
making scale up to industrial level practicable. The activities modified tempering conditions. The hardness also shows
involved are the optimisation of heat treatment on RHA steel in a substantial rise at both the tempering conditions than the
order to get medium hardness, subsequent mechanical property presently used steel hardness.
and microstructural evaluation, and ballistic evaluation against
Table 2. Mechanical properties of RHA Steel at different
small arms and large caliber ammunition. Presently RHA
tempering temperatures
steel is used for the manufacturing of structural parts of battle
tanks in India and it has a hardness value of around 300 VHN. Tempering YS UTS % Hardness CVN (J)
This steel was made by Steel Authority of India Limited and temp. (ºC) (MPa) (MPa) El (VHN) at RT
supplied in the form of rolled plates. In this work, objective
was to enhance the hardness of RHA steel to about 400-450 450 1380 1520 13 457 35
VHN by employing suitable heat treatment procedures. The 500 1306 1450 14 430 44
targeted hardness is nearly 50 per cent higher than the existing 650 900 1000 15 300 90
RHA steel being used. While increase in hardness and strength
of steel results in improved ballistic properties, it is generally 3.2 Weldability
accompanied by a loss in impact properties and weldability1-2. Weldability of the modified heat treated RHA steel was
Weldability is an important issue since fabrication of structures, evaluated by Tekken tests and results have been found to
armour modules, etc. employ welding extensively for joining. be satisfactory up to 25 mm thickness in 450 °C tempered
Thus, it becomes essential to optimise processing parameters condition and up to 80 mm thickness in steel plates tempered at
specially heat treatment to achieve higher hardness and strength 500 °C. Figure 1 displays the 80 mm thick Tekken test specimen
without significant loss in weldability. after the welding process. The Tekken test specimens were
Table 1. Chemical composition of rha steel cut into slices across the thickness for further observation.
Figure 2 illustrates the microstructures of 500 °C tempered
C Si Mn Cr Ni Mo V Fe welded samples of 80 mm thickness plate. No visual cracks
0.28- 0.1- 0.4- 1.4- 1.5- 0.4- 0.08- were observed. Local critical stress was found to be about
Balance
0.33 0.25 0.6 1.5 1.7 0.45 0.12 560MPa for 500 °C tempered welded specimens as shown in
Fig. 3.
3.1 Mechanical Properties
By varying the tempering temperature of RHA steel, a
wide range of mechanical properties are achieved. The yield
strength and tensile strengths varied in the ranges of 1146
MPa - 1463 MPa and 1247 MPa - 1900 MPa, respectively.
The hardness of the steel varies between 381 VHN - 586
VHN. The charpy impact energy varies in the range of 19J
- 85 J depending on tempering temperature. Based on the
hardness and CVN energy results, two tempering temperatures
450°C and 500 °C are selected which produced a hardness of Figure 1. 80 mm Tekken specimen after welding.
Figure 2. Microstructure of 500 °C tempered 80 mm thick Tekken specimens (a) Base metal, (b) Base metal – weldments interface,
and (c) HAZ.
413
Def. SCI. J., Vol. 67, No. 4, july 2017
normalised dop
stree (MPa)
temperature (°C)
failure time (min)
Figure 5. Large caliber ballistic evaluation results.
Figure 3. Stress-time curve for 500 °C tempering condition.
tanks or can be used as add-on armour for battle tanks. The high
3.3 Ballistic Performance hardness steels are therefore going to play an important role
The medium hardness steel plates tempered at 500 °C in the design of fighting vehicles for improved performance
were ballistically tested against 125 mm FSAPDS ammunition against the kinetic energy threats.
(Fig. 4). The large caliber ballistic test results are as shown in DMR-1700 steel (Table 3) is a medium carbon low alloy
Fig. 5 and it can be observed that ballistic performance of high hardness steel developed by DMRL. This steel has shown
the 500 °C tempered plates is approximately 10 per cent - promising results for armour application due to its high strength
15 per cent better than the presently used RHA steel plates. and hardness values. Figure 6 shows the microstructures of
Against armour piercing projectiles such as 7.62 AP and the steel plates after heat treatment. Tempered martensitic
12.7 AP, medium hardness plates showed about 20 per cent - microstructure is observed in all the plates up to 50 mm
25 per cent improvement in ballistic performance measured in thickness. Table 4 displays the comparison of mechanical
terms of depth of penetration. properties of DMR-1700 steel plates and RHA steel. The
strength and hardness of DMR-1700 steel are significantly
higher in comparison to RHA.
C Si Mn Cr Ni Mo Co Fe
0.33- 1.8- 0.35- 0.8- 2.8-
<1 <1 Balance
0.38 2.3 0.65 1.2 3.2
414
singh, et al.: Future Armour Materials and Technologies for Combat Platforms
Table 4. Comparison of mechanical properties of DMR-1700 Table 5. Chemical composition of high nitrogen steel (wt%)
plates with RHA steel
C Cr Mn N Si P (max) S (max) Fe
YS UTS Hardness % CVN @
Steel 0.03- 17.5- 17.5- 0.5- 0.3-
(MPa) (MPa) (VHN) El RT(J) 0.06 0.015 Bal
0.06 20 20 0.7 0.7
DMR 1700 1610 1970 580 11 34
large caliber ammunitions. From the ballistic test it is seen
RHA 900 1000 300 15 90
that HNS exhibits improved ballistic performance of about 35
per cent against soft projectiles, 10 per cent against armour
4.1 Ballistic Performance piercing projectiles and similar performance against long
The ballistic performance of high hardness steel (DMR- rod kinetic energy projectiles (125FSAPDS) as compared to
1700 steel) has been evaluated against various small arms RHA steel3.
ammunition as well as against large caliber ammunitions.
DMR 1700 steel shows much improved ballistic performance 6. Glass Composites Laminates
in comparison to RHA. This can be attributed to the high Fighting vehicles comprising light weight armour made
strength and hardness of DMR 1700 steel in comparison to up of ceramic and polymer composite possess better mobility,
RHA. From the ballistic test it is seen that DMR-1700 steel fighting ability and fire power as compared to the vehicle
exhibits improved ballistic performance of about 25 per cent with traditional steel armour. From the past two decades
against 7.62 AP ammunition and 20 per cent against long rod glass, aramid and ultra high molecular weight polyethylene
kinetic energy projectiles (125FSAPDS) (Fig. 7) as compared (UHMWPE) fibre reinforced composites have gained
to RHA steel. considerable importance for structural and add-on armour
applications due to their high specific strength and high
energy absorption under dynamic loads4-6. Effect of type of
fibre reinforcements such as glass, aramid, carbon and ultra
high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) on ballistic
performance was reported. Energy absorption mechanisms
normalised DOP
Figure 7. Ballistic performance comparison of DMR 1700 steel 6.1 Ballistic Evaluation
and RHA steel. Two different composite laminates namely E-glass/epoxy
and E-glass / phenolic laminates were subjected to ballistic
5. High Nitrogen Steel evaluation against 125 mm FSAPDS ammunition. Performance
There has always been a demand to reduce the weight of the laminates is compared by measuring the depth of
of armoured structures used in various ballistic applications. penetration in backing steel plates. Ballistic evaluation was
Weight reduction can be achieved by using newer materials carried out at PXE, Balasore range using 125 mm FSAPDS
having better ballistic performance or by changing the design ammunition with tungston heavy alloy (WHA) penetrator. The
of armour systems. Traditionally, high strength low alloy steel penetrator was fired from smooth bore gun of T-72 tank at a
with tempered martensitic microstructure has been widely used impact velocity of 1650±30 m/s. Residual depth of penetration
in various armour applications. Apart from high strength low in backing RHA plates was measured. Schematic diagram for
alloy steels, studies have also been carried out on other class of measurement of residual depth of penetration in RHA plates
steels such as secondary hardening steels, auto tempered steels, is as shown in Fig. 8. Thickness and mass efficiency of the
maraging steels, bainitic steels and nickel free high nitrogen composites were calculated and compared with RHA. Due to
steels (HNS) for potential ballistic applications. the limitations on availability of material only limited no of
Defence Metallurgical Research Laboratory (DMRL), tests were performed.
Hyderabad has recently developed high nitrogen steel Mass and thickness efficiencies for the both laminates
(Table 5) for armour applications. High nitrogen steel has been have been calculated and as shown in Table 6. From the data, it
produced industrially at M/s. Jindal stainless (Hisar) limited, is observed that both the laminates show approximately similar
Hisar, Haryana, India. The steel plates have been evaluated performance against FSAPDS ammunition with limited ballistic
against various small arms ammunition as well as against data, phenolic shows slightly better performance but this need
415
Def. SCI. J., Vol. 67, No. 4, july 2017
Table 6. Mass efficiency and thickness efficiency of different target and thereby destroy the armour, whereas, the chemical
glass composites against 125 mm fsapds energy weapons produces high velocity jets and cause damage
to the armour. Long rod kinetic energy projectiles are used to
Module Mass efficiency Thickness efficiency
defeat thick armour plates used in main battle tanks13. Hence
E-glass/Phenolic 1.17 0.61 design of armour should be made such that it can reduce
E-glass/Epoxy 1.13 0.60 the penetration of the projectile by defeating the same. This
RHA 1.00 1.00 reduction in penetration can be achieved by appropriate
designing of armour materials. Hence, selection of materials
is very essential for design aspect. The properties of the
materials should be such that it can blunt the projectile, should
dissipate the shock waves generated during impact loading and
to absorb the energy of the projectiles by undergoing severe
plastic deformation. For blunting of projectile, a hard material
such as high hardness steel or ceramic can be used at the front.
However ceramic or high hardness materials cannot be used
at the front due to their brittle behaviour and thereby losing
the integrity of the laminate structure. Rolled homogeneous
armour is considered to be a suitable candidate to face the
initial impact. DMRL had designed and developed new
Kanchan armour modules for improved ballistic performance
against large caliber ammunitions by optimising the armour
structures for improved protection which can absorb lot of
impact energy.
416
singh, et al.: Future Armour Materials and Technologies for Combat Platforms
417
Def. SCI. J., Vol. 67, No. 4, july 2017
of E-glass composite laminates when it is subjected to 125mm 11. Lanz, W.; Odermatt, W. & Weihrauch, G. Kinetic energy
FSAPDS ammunition. Laminate ballistic performance has projectiles: Development history, state of the art, trends.
been compared with RHA and found that mass efficiency is In 19th International Symposium on Ballistics, Interlaken,
better than RHA whereas thickness efficiency is inferior to Switzerland, 2001.
RHA plates. Kanchan composite armour can provide protection 12. Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/ Wiki/Composite_
against kinetic energy projectiles as well as chemical energy armour (Accessed on 03 Februray 2016).
based shaped charged projectiles. 13. Senthil, P. Ponguru; Kumar, K. Siva & Gogia, A.K.
High strength armour steels have been developed for use Terminal ballistic eroding long rod impact DMRL
in explosive reactive armour. The ERA developed has resulted technical report. Technical Report No. DRDO-DMRL-
in 80 per cent reduction in the shaped charge penetration and ADDG-019- 2012.
around 30 per cent reduction in the long rod penetration in 14. Elshenawy, Tamer; Ismail M.M & Reyad, A. Optimization
RHA. NERA can reduce more than half of the penetration of of performance of explosive reactive armours. In 21st
HEAT missile when compared to its penetration in monolithic International symposium on ballistics, Adelaide, Australia,
RHA steel plate. 2004, 1, P. 227.
15. Yadav, H.S.; Bohra, B.M.; Joshi, G.D.; Sundaram, S.G.
References Kamat, P.V. Study on basic mechanism of reactive armour.
1. Jena, P.K.; Bidyapati, Mishra; Babu, M. Ramesh; Babu Def. Sci. J., 1995, 45, 207-212.
A.K.; Singh, Arvindha, K; Kumar Siva & Bhat, T.B. Effect 16. Held, M. Schutzanordnung gegen Geschosse, insbesondere
of heat treatment on mechanical and ballistic properties of Hohlladungsgeschosse, 1973 German Patent No.
a high strength armour steel. Int. J. Impact Eng., 2010, 37, 2358227.
242-249. 17. Lundgren, R., Medin, G., Olsson, E. & Sjod, L. Reactive
doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2009.09.003 armor arrangements. 1987. US Patent No. 4881448.
2. Metals handbook. Ed. 9. Welding, Brazing and Soldering, 18. Mayseless, M., Erlich, Y., Falcovitz, J., Rosenberg, G.
American Society for Metals, Metals Park, OH, ASM, & Wheis, D. (1984) Interaction of shaped charge jets
Vol. No. 6, 1983. with reactive armour. In 8th International Symposium on
3. Singh, B Bhav; Sukumar, G.; Kumar, K. Siva & Gogia, Ballistics, Orlando, USA.
A.K. Ballistic studies on nickel free high nitrogen steel. 19. Rao, S.S.; singh, B bhav; Papukutty, K.K.; Madhu, V.;
Technical Report No. DRDO-DMRL-ADDG-1-120- Siva kumar, K. & Bhat, T Balakrishna. Bulging composite
2016, 2016. armour against high explosive anti tank ammunitions.
4. Sutherland, L.S. & Soares, C.G. Impact characterization DMRL, TR No: 2002 313, 2002
of low fibre volume glass reinforced polyester circular
laminated plates. Int. J. Impact. Eng., 2005, 31, 1-23. Acknowledgments
doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2003.11.006 The authors would like to thank Director, DMRL for giving
5. Aslan, Z.; Karakuzu, R. & Okutan, B. The response of permission to publish this paper. The valuable suggestions of
laminated composite plates under low velocity impact Dr T. Balakrishna Bhat and Dr A.K. Gogia have been very
loading. Composite Structure, 2003, 59(1), 19-27. useful. The authors would like to thank PXE, Balasore for
doi: 10.1016/S0263-8223(02)00185-X conducting large caliber ammunition trials and HEMRL, Pune
6. Sutherland, L.S. & Soares, C.G. Impact on low fibre- for conducting HEAT ammunition trials on bulging armour
volume, glass polyester rectangular plates. Composite panels and ERA panels. Support of various groups and small
Structure, 2005, 68, 13-22. arms range of DMRL in different stages of this work is highly
doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.02.010 appreciated.
7. Larsson, F. & Svensson, L. Carbon, polyethylene and PBO
hybrid fiber composites for structural light weight armour. Contributors
Compos. Pt. A Appl. Sci. Manufact. 2002, 33, 221-231.
doi: 10.1016/S1359-835X(01)00095-1 Mr B. Bhav Singh obtained his MTech (Metallurgical & Materials
8. Morye, S.S.; Hine, P.J.; Duckett, R.A.; Carr, D.J. & Ward, engineering) from the Indian Institute of Technology Madras, in
I.M. Modelling of the energy absorption by polymer 2004. Currently he is working as Scientist E at Armour Design
and Development Division, Defence Metallurgical Research
composites upon ballistic impact. Compos. Sci. Technol.
Laboratory, Hyderabad. His research interests are in the areas
2000, 60, 2631-2642.
of development of steel, titanium armour, bulging armour.
doi: 10.1016/S0266-3538(00)00139-1 In the present work, he has carried out the experimental studies
9 Masta, M.R.O.; Crayton, D.H.; Deshpande, V.S & Wadley, on high hardness steel, medium hardness steel, high nitrogen
H.N.G. Mechanisms of penetration in olyethylene steels, bulging and preparation the manuscript.
reinforced cross-ply laminates. Int. J. Impact. Eng., 2015,
86, 249-264. Mr G. Sukumar obtained his MTech (Metallurgical and
10. Karahan, M.; Jabbar, A. & Karahan, N. Ballistic impact Materials engineering) from the Indian Institute of Technology
behavior of the aramid and ultra-high molecular weight Madras, in 2009. Currently, he is working as Scientist-C
polyethylene composites. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos., 2015, at the Armour Design and Development Division, Defence
34(1) 37-48. Metallurgical Research Laboratory, Hyderabad. His research
418
singh, et al.: Future Armour Materials and Technologies for Combat Platforms
interests are in the areas of development of steel, titanium Dr K. Siva Kumar obtained his PhD (Metallurgical and Materials
armour and bulging armour. Engineering) from IIT Bombay, Mumbai, in 1995. Presently, he
In the present work, he was involved in the experimental is working as Scientist G at Armour Design and Development
studies on high nitrogen steels, bulging armour and writing Division, Defence Metallurgical Research Laboratory, Hyderabad.
manuscript. He is working in the areas of development of armour materials
and systems for various types of protective applications.
Mr P. Ponguru Senthil obtained his MTech (Metallurgical and His research interests are in the areas of composite armour
Materials engineering) from the Indian Institute of Technology development, metallic armour materials and bulging armour.
Madras, in 2016. Presently he is working as Scientist-D at the In the present work, he was involved in planning of work
Armour Design and Development Division, Defence Metallurgical and arranging various materials and systems required for
Research Laboratory, Hyderabad. He is involved in the development experiments.
of armour steel plates for advanced explosive reactive armour
and medium hardness armour steel development. Dr Vemuri Madhu, obtained his PhD (Applied Mechanics)
In the present work, he was involved in the experimental from IIT Delhi, in 1993. Currently, he heads the Armour
studies on explosive reactive armour. Design and Development Division, Defence Metallurgical
Research Laboratory, Hyderabad. He is working in the areas
Mr P.K. Jena obtained his BE (Metallurgical engineering) from of development of armour materials and systems for various
Utkal Univesity, in 2001. Presently, he is working as Scientist types of protective applications. His research interests are :
‘D’ in Defence Metallurgical Research Laboratory, Hyderabad. Ceramic and composite armour development, modelling and
He is working in the areas of development of armour materials simulation of ballistic phenomena, high strain rate, shock and
& systems for various types of protective applications. His blast studies.
research interests are in the areas of development of metallic In the present work, he was involved in design of experiments
armour materials like high hardness and medium hardness steel and analysis of test results.
and aluminium armour.
In the present work, he was involved in the development of Dr G. Madhusudhan Reddy obtained PhD (Metallurgical
high hardness armour steels, medium hardness steels and their Engineering) from Indian Institute of Technology, Madras, in
weldability studies. 1999. Presently he is working as Scientist ‘H’ and heading
the Metal Joining Group of Defence Metallurgical Research
Mr P. Rama Subba Reddy obtained his MSc (Polymer Sci.) Laboratory, Hyderabad. He has more than 300 scientific
from S.K. University, Ananthapur, in 1998. Presently, he is publications to his credit.
working as Scientist E at Armour Design and Development In the present work, he has carried out the weldability studies
Division, Defence Metallurgical Research Laboratory, Hyderabad. of different armour materials such as high hardness steels and
He is working in the areas of development of armour materials medium hardness steels.
and systems for various types of protective applications. He
has rich experience in various areas like armour composites
and their evaluation for ballistic applications.
In the present work, he has carried out the experimental studies
on composites armour.
419