See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/283735712

Composite armour - A review

Article in Journal of the Indian Institute of Science · July 2015

CITATIONS READS

56 13,932

2 authors:

Kiran Akella Niranjan K. Naik

24 PUBLICATIONS 332 CITATIONS

Indian Institute of Technology Bombay
170 PUBLICATIONS 6,795 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
SEE PROFILE

All content following this page was uploaded by Niranjan K. Naik on 26 May 2016.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

 Journal of the Indian Institute of Science
A Multidisciplinary Reviews Journal
ISSN: 0970-4140 Coden-JIISAD

© Indian Institute of Science

Reviews
Composite Armour—A Review

Kiran Akella1 and Niranjan K. Naik2

Abstract | Primary constituent materials of composite armour can be

categorized as ceramics and fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) composites.
In this paper, we first examine a range of these primary constituent
materials. We study their individual response to ballistic impact, and then
compare their performance with other constituent materials. We review
various combinations of these constituent materials and compare their
characteristics. Subsequently, we study different configurations of armour.
We also review studies conducted on the effect of bullet shapes and bullet
materials. Based on these studies, we arrived at design considerations.
Furthermore, we have reviewed the probable future directions for
composite armour.
Keywords: ceramic, fiber reinforced polymer, ballistic impact, performance comparison, configuration

1 Introduction or ceramic-FRP composite armour. Such composite

Efficient armour requires hard, tough and armour consists of a ceramic layer backed by a
lightweight materials with significant penetration composite or metal layer. The ceramic layer provides
resistance and energy absorbing capabilities. primary ballistic impact resistance. The inner Ballistic impact: It is a high
High hardness steel was used as one of the composite or metal layer is for secondary energy velocity impact by a projectile
substantially smaller than the
first engineered armour materials. However, absorption. It also serves as the backing for brittle target mass. It is a localised
with increasing demands on reducing weight, ceramics. Due to the high specific strength and phenomenon and response
researchers and designers explored other materials. specific stiffness of FRP composites used as backing of materials in the vicinity
of impact area is of primary
Aluminum alloys, other lightweight metals such layer, ceramic-composite armour is one of the importance for mitigation.
as titanium and their alloys, were hence used as lightest alternatives to monolithic metallic armour.
armour materials. There are other forms of armour using only
Ceramics are stronger than metals under heavy FRP composites such as fabric or textile armour.
compressive loads acting in the vicinity of areas These are suitable for lower threats such as
subjected to impact. Their much lower density handgun bullets. They cannot sustain more lethal
makes them attractive lightweight alternatives threats. Hence, we did not include a discussion
to metallic armour. But processing of ceramics on fabric armour. We focus on only ceramic-
requires high temperature and pressure. Hence, composite armour.
they are more expensive than metals. Another In this paper, we first review various constituent
drawback of ceramics is their brittle behaviour materials used for armour. Subsequently, a detailed 1
Scientist, Research
causing heavy degradation on impact. They, discussion of some of the widely used ceramics, and Development
Establishment (Engineers),
therefore, have lower capability to withstand their performance comparison, studies for their Defence Research
multiple hits than metallic armour. property enhancement and unconventional and Development
Attempts were made to improve the ductility processing methods are reviewed. We then review Organisation, Alandi Road,
Kalas, Pune 411015,
of ceramics by embedding ceramic fibers inside FRP composites including different fiber materials, Maharashtra, India.
bulk ceramics. Such materials are popularly matrix materials and prepregs. [email protected]
known as ceramic matrix composites (CMCs). Furthermore, we discuss the response of 2
Adjunct Professor,
However, CMCs are difficult to process and even composites to ballistic impact. We compare the Aerospace Engineering
more expensive than conventional ceramics. Their performance of various composites and effects Department, Indian
Institute of Technology
use is hence, restricted to specialized applications. of different weave pattern, followed by a review Bombay, Mumbai 400076,
Another way attempted to improve the energy of the work done on hybrid composites and Maharashtra, India.
absorption of ceramics was by using ceramic-metal 3-dimensional (3D) composites. [email protected]

Journal of the Indian Institute of Science VOL 95:3 Jul.–Sep. 2015 journal.iisc.ernet.in
 Kiran Akella and Niranjan K. Naik

Subsequently, we briefly study two material Pressing can be uniaxial and isostatic. It can
combinations for armour: ceramic-metal and be at room temperature or under heated
ceramic-composites and their performance conditions.
comparison. We then discuss different armour
configurations based on the parameters affecting 2.2.1 Performance comparison of ceramics:
armour design, such as confinement, impedance The performance of different ceramics was
matching, tile edge geometry, ceramic/backing evaluated by multiple researchers and compared
thickness ratio, wrapping of tiles, shape of with the performance of RHA. Medvedoski32
ceramics, stacking sequence and coating ceramics reported that Al2O3 ceramics are the most cost-
directly on the fabric. effective armour materials. Ceramics with varying
We then review different projectile shapes and Al2O3 content from 97 to 99.6% by weight were
materials. Based on the aforementioned studies studied. Ballistic energy dissipated and hardness
and reviews, we present design considerations increased with the increase in alumina content.
for choice of ceramics, composites and ceramic- High level of bullet erosion was observed for
composite armour. The future directions for ceramics with higher hardness.
composite armour are discussed followed by the Ernst et al.9 compared the performance of four
concluding remarks. ceramics, namely, Al2O3, B4C, SiC and TiB2. They
compared volume gain and mass gain due to each
2 Armour Constituent Materials ceramics with RHA as the base. The volume gain
The constituent materials used for armour are Vg is calculated using the formula
discussed in this section. We briefly review metals. PRHA − Pres
We then present detailed review of ceramics, Vg = , (1)
Tcer
composites and their performance.
where PRHA is the penetration of the projectile in
2.1 Metals plain RHA target, Pres the penetration in RHA when
Monolithic metal armour systems primarily ceramic tile of thickness Tcer is placed before it. These
comprise steel, aluminum and titanium alloys. parameters in Equation 1 are graphically illustrated
Meyers34 observes that steel has been the principal in Figure 1. Mass gain Mg was calculated using
armour material for heavy armour in tanks due ρRHA
to its low cost, ease of fabrication and structural M g = Vg , (2)
ρcer
efficiency. Rolled homogenous armour (RHA)
is the standard armour material. The author where ρRHA is the density of RHA and ρcer the
mentions high hardness steel and electroslag- density of ceramics.
refined steel as the more advanced materials. The authors reported a nominal volume
Aluminum alloys and titanium alloys are also used gain for Al2O3 and B4C. The highest volume gain
popularly for metallic armour. for TiB2 is ∼1.7. Therefore, volume gain due to
ceramics is not substantial. On the contrary,
2.2 Ceramics when mass gain is compared, ceramics are found
Ceramics were used for armour applications to be more attractive. The lowest mass gain for
during the late 1960s and early 1970s. Lanz28 alumina is two-fold, which is higher than the
mentions that early experiences on the behavior highest volume gain of 1.7 for TiB2. For all other
of Al2O3 ceramics subjected to ballistic impact ceramics, the mass gain is three-fold and B4C is
were documented in 1979. Some of the widely most promising.
used ceramics for armour applications are Al2O3, James25 estimated the mass and thickness
AlN, B4C, SiC, TiB2 and WC. required to defeat 14.5 mm, 30 mm fin stabilized
FSAPDS: These projectiles Armour ceramics can be classified on the armour piercing discarding sabot (FSAPDS) and
are supported inside the basis of density.17 Ceramics with density greater
gun barrel by a sabot. The
sabot is released once the than RHA are high density ceramics. Those with
projectile is out of the barrel. density lower than RHA are low density ceramics.
These projectiles have fins to Typical high density ceramic is WC, whereas low
stabilize their flight.
density ceramics include Al2O3, AlN, B4C, SiC and
TiB2.
Another method to classify ceramics is based
on the manufacturing process.7 Some widely
Figure 1: Schematic illustration of the test
used processes for ceramic armour are sintered,
specimen after projectile penetration experiments.
pressed-sintered, reaction-bonded3 and gelcast.

298 Journal of the Indian Institute of Science VOL 95:3 Jul.–Sep. 2015 journal.iisc.ernet.in
 Composite Armour—A Review

40 mm FSAPDS rounds. In this study, the cost of flow of fragmented material govern the penetration
ceramics is also included. The author reports that resistance.
the thickness and mass is the lowest with TiB2.
Novel-Al2O3, reaction-bonded SiC (RB-SiC), B4C, 2.2.2 Property enhancement of ceramics: Reaction bonded: Reaction
SiC and AlN also have mass very close to TiB2. Properties of ceramics can be enhanced by mixing bonded silicon carbide is
manufactured by a chemical
However, the cost of TiB2 is much higher than all two or more ceramics (heterogenous ceramics) reaction between porous
other ceramics. or making ceramic-composites. Galanov et al.13 carbon with molten silicon.
For easier comparison, we normalized the studied various ceramic composites such as B4C-
volume gain and mass gain with RHA and TiB2, B4C-ZrB2, B4C-W2B5 and B4C-TiB2-W2B5
compared between two different studies as listed systems. By altering the percentages of different
in Table 1. Both these studies show similar trends. phases, they observed a substantial increase of
TiB2 shows highest volume gain. TiB2, B4C and SiC mechanical properties; they also reported that the
have relatively similar mass gain. flexural strength of these composites increased
Peron48 studied high density ceramics for from 450 MPa of B4C to 700 MPa.
armour applications. Reported results show Al2O3-TiB2 composites were studied by Adams
significant volume gain of more than 2-fold for et al.2 DOP studies showed that the improvement
high density ceramics (WC) than RHA, therefore, with composites is within the experimental
these ceramics are considered suitable where there scatter shown by commercial armour ceramics.
is a severe constraint of space. However, they show Medvedoski33 studied SiC-Al2O3-Si3N4
an increase in mass for certain types of WC (0.67) compositions and found them to have superior
and negligible mass gain (1.01) for a specific type ballistic performance. TiC-steel composites were
of WC. Gooch and Burkins17 also studied high made by Zaretsky et al.67.
density ceramics subjected to depth of penetration Strassburger and Lexow56 studied the effect of
(DOP) tests. They found a thickness dependency grain size on ballistic resistance using DOP tests.
for mass gain and volume gain. The gains increase The authors observed better performance of AP steel projectiles: They
as the thickness increases. submicron alumina in DOP than the commercially are designed to penetrate
armour. They are made
Orphal44 studied three ceramics—B4C, SiC and available alumina. However, no significant of high strength materials
AlN, in a confined state by performing difference in ballistic resistance was observed to withstand the shock of
reverse ballistic experiments with long rod when 14.5 armour piercing (AP) steel projectiles punching through armour.

penetrators. He reported that normalized were used against ceramic-aluminum targets.

penetration versus impact velocity curve is almost Reverse ballistic
independent of the material. Shockey and 2.2.3 Unconventional processing: Lillo et al.29 experiments: In these
experiments, a ceramic target
Marchand53 carried out impact experiments on studied pressureless sintered SiC and SiC whisker is accelerated towards the
confined ceramics to study their failure reinforced SiC matrix composites for lightweight stationary projectile.
phenomenon. They observed that friction and armour applications. Pressureless SiC showed
Pressureless sintering: It is
similar ballistic limit as in conventional SiC, but at the sintering of a powder at
Table 1: Volume gain and mass gain reported by
a reduced manufacturing cost. Similarly, high temperatures without
two different studies. pressureless densification of B4C was studied by applied pressure. This avoids
density variations in the final
Speyer and Lee.55
Volume gain Mass gain component which occurs with
Aghajanian et al.3 developed SiC and B4C more traditional hot pressing
Ernst Ernst reaction bonded ceramics. The authors could methods.
et al. James et al. James
Ceramic (2001) (2001) (2001) (2001) match the performance of the same hot pressed
ceramics at lower processing costs. Whiskers: Whiskers are
RHA 1 1 1 1 filament-like crystalline
materials. They have
Al2O3 sintered 1.01 0.7 2.14 1.67 2.3 Composites properties representing the
95% purity Composites are gaining in popularity due to their crystal anisotropy and an
almost defect-free structure.
Al2O3 sintered – 0.78 – 1.67 high specific strength and stiffness. Researchers Their strength can be close
98% purity have extensively studied them for armour to the theoretical ultimate
Novel-alumina – 0.88 – 2 applications. Long fiber reinforced composites are strength value of a given
sintered material. As a result, whiskers
widely used for such applications. Different fiber can be several dozen times
RB-SiC – 0.88 – 3.33 materials, matrix materials and prepregs have been stronger than regular crystals.
TiB2 1.67 1.75 2.96 3.33 studied. Woven and non-woven, 3D and hybrid
B4C 1 0.78 3.13 2.5 fabrics with different types of fibers or fabrics in a
SiC 1.25 1 3.05 2.5
single laminate are some of architectures evaluated
by researchers. Such studies are reviewed in the
AlN – 1 – 2.5
subsequent subsections.

Journal of the Indian Institute of Science VOL 95:3 Jul.–Sep. 2015 journal.iisc.ernet.in 299
 Kiran Akella and Niranjan K. Naik

Table 2: Physical properties of fibers.

Density Initial modulus Tensile strength Elongation
Material (kg/m3) (GPa) (MPa) (%) Source

E-Glass 2540 72 3448 4 Gibson (1994)

Carbon (T300) 1760 231 3750 1.4 Gibson (1994)
Aramid 1440 71–97 2900–3350 3.6–4.4 Tam et al. (2006)
HMPE 970 113–124 3210–3610 3.6–4.4 Tam et al. (2006)

Prepreg: It is a term for 2.3.1 Fibers: The primary reinforcement 2.3.4 Prepregs: Bhatnagar et al.6 presented a
pre-impregnated composite materials for composites in armour are fibers. Tam discussion on the use of prepregs for ballistic
fibers where a matrix material
is already present. This matrix and Bhatnagar57 categorized the high performance composites. They highlighted the increasing use
material includes curing fibers as: (i) classical (glass, carbon); (ii) rigid chain of ballistic prepegs. The authors pointed that
agents. Prepregs can be aromatic (nylon, aramid); (iii) high temperature ballistic prepregs are different from structural
placed on the mould without
the addition of any more (Poly-benzimidazole—PBI, Polyphenylene- prepregs since they are resin starved, the resin
resin. Subsequently, they are benzobisozazole—PBO); and (iv) thermoplastic content is only 10–20% unlike structural prepregs
heated under pressure for (liquid crystal fiber, high modulus polyethylene— that have are 40–50%. These prepregs are not
complete curing.
HMPE). Comparative physical properties of some tacky and are in ‘A’ stage. Structural prepregs are
Thermoset and of these fibers are listed in Table 2. ‘B’ staged. Both thermoset and thermoplastic
thermoplastic: The primary Three types of glass fibers were reported in resins are used for ballistic prepregs.
physical difference is
that thermoplastics can literature—Eglass, Rglass and Sglass. Carbon
be remelted back into a fibers can be classified as poly-acrylo-nitrile- 2.3.5 Response of composites subjected to
liquid, whereas thermoset based (PAN) or Pitch-based depending on the ballistic impact: Pandya et al.47 gave a detailed
plastics always remain in a
permanent solid state. precursor used. Nylon, nomex and aramid (Trade description of the different stages of penetration
names: Kevlar®, Twaron®) are derived from and perforation of a rigid cylindrical projectile
aromatic acids and amines. These are synthetic with a flat end into a 2D woven composite target.
organic fibers known for their high performance. These stages are presented schematically in
PBI and PBO (commercially available as Zylon® Figure 2. When the projectile strikes onto a
from Toyobo™) are high strength fibers with composite target, the planar view can be sub-
excellent stability at higher temperatures. High divided into two regions as shown in Figure 3. The
temperature melting and spinning is used to make region directly below the projectile is referred to as
thermoplastic fibers such as liquid crystal fibers Region 1. The surrounding region up to which the
(commercially available as Vectran®) and HMPE transverse stress wave travels along the in-plane
Yarn: It is a long continuous (commercially available as Spectra®, Dyneema®). directions is referred to as Region 2. The yarns
length of interlocked fibres. that are in contact with the projectile during the
There are two main types of
yarn: spun and filament. 2.3.2 Fabrics: Fabrics can be woven or non- ballistic impact event are referred to as primary
woven. They can be as 2-dimensional (2D) lamina yarns; the primary yarns are along the warp and
or with 3D architecture. Song54 listed the types fill directions. The remaining yarns within the
of 2D fabrics as plain weave, basket weave, twill surrounding region up to which the transverse
weave, crowfoot weave and satin weave. The author stress wave travels along the in-plane directions
specifies that the commonly used fabric structures are referred to as secondary yarns. It may be noted
for ballistic applications are plain weave, basket that only primary yarns are present in Region 1,
weave and unidirectional. Thomas59 identified whereas both primary and secondary yarns are
different types of non-woven fabrics. They are present in Region 2.
parallel filaments with resin reinforcement, stitch Figure 2(a) indicates beginning of the ballistic
bonded, cross-lapped and needle punched. impact event. The impact event can be sub-divided
into three stages. During Stage 1, the compressive
Waves: When ballistic impact 2.3.3 Matrix materials: Hannibal and Weir20 and shear stress waves travel along the thickness
occurs on a target, different mention that matrix resins are either thermoset or direction. The layers of the composite target
types of stress waves are
generated. From the point thermoplastic. Song54 reports that the first matrix undergo compression directly below the projectile
of impact, they propagate material system qualified for ballistic protective body and also in the surrounding region as shown in
outward. They may be armours was phenolic resin. The authors also report Figure 2(b). The compression of layers in Region 2
reflected at interfaces and
boundaries are generate a the use of vinyl ester and thermoplastic polyurethane. is because of transverse shear wave propagating in
complex stress patterns Blends of these as well as other resin systems such as the in-plane directions. Compression of layers
in the material. epoxies, polyethylene etc. are also widely used. also produces tension along the in-plane direction

300 Journal of the Indian Institute of Science VOL 95:3 Jul.–Sep. 2015 journal.iisc.ernet.in
 Composite Armour—A Review

the layers could fail under compression, tension,

or shear plugging whenever the induced strains Shear plugging: This type
exceed the corresponding failure strains. of failure occurs when a
projectile punches through
Stage 2 starts when the shear wave reaches the the material. The residue of
back face of the target (Figure 2(c)). Depending the material comes out along
on the number of layers failed in Stage 1 and the with the projectile is called
the plug.
kinetic energy available with the projectile, conical
deformation of the target could take place on the
back face as shown in Figure 2(d). Thickness of
the laminate and the incident impact velocity
of the projectile influence the number of layers
failed and the kinetic energy available with the
projectile at the end of Stage 1. The layers that
do not fail in Stage 1 undergo tension as a result
of conical deformation, and could fail when the
induced tensile strain exceeds the failure strain
(Figure 2(e)). Stage 2 ends when the material is
completely failed either by shear plugging or by
tension. Even after the complete failure of the
target, there can be friction between the target
and the moving projectile. This stage is referred to
as Stage 3. Some energy can be absorbed because
of friction. Stage 3 ends when the projectile tip
reaches the back face of the target as shown in
Figure 2(f). At this stage, if the projectile is having
some residual kinetic energy, it would exit from
the target with a certain residual velocity.
Pandya et al.47 identified that during the
ballistic impact event, energy lost by the projectile
is absorbed by the target through various damage
Figure 2: Penetration and perforation stages of and energy absorbing mechanisms such as
2D woven fabric composite target during ballistic compression of the target directly below the
impact (Pandya et al., 2014). projectile, compression in the region surrounding
the impacted zone, shear plugging, stretching and
tensile failure of yarns/layers in the region
consisting of primary yarns, tensile deformation
of yarns/layers in the region consisting of
secondary yarns, conical deformation on the back
face of the target, delamination, matrix cracking, Delamination: In laminated
and friction between the projectile and the target. materials, repeated cyclic
stresses or impact can cause
The authors studied the effect of target layers to separate. This
thickness on ballistic limit and found that ballistic results in a significant loss of
limit increased as the target thickness increased. mechanical toughness.

The energy absorbing mechanisms in two types of

targets, one 6 mm and another 20 mm thick were
studied. The major energy absorbing mechanisms
for target thickness of 6 mm are shear plugging,
stretching and tensile failure in the region consisting
of primary yarns, tensile deformation of yarns/layers
Figure 3: Schematic arrangement of a typical in the region consisting of secondary yarns, and
2D woven fabric composite target during ballistic energy carried by the moving cone. Energy absorbed
impact: front view (Pandya et al., 2014). by the other mechanisms is not significant.
The major energy absorbing mechanisms for
in the surrounding region. The shear wave follows target thickness of 20 mm are shear plugging,
the compressive wave. As the compressive and stretching and tensile failure in the region
shear waves travel along the thickness direction, consisting of primary yarns, tensile deformation of

Journal of the Indian Institute of Science VOL 95:3 Jul.–Sep. 2015 journal.iisc.ernet.in 301
 Kiran Akella and Niranjan K. Naik

yarns/layers in the region consisting of secondary epoxy. Consequently, glass-epoxy laminates absorb
yarns, and friction between the projectile and the higher energy than carbon-epoxy, and therefore
target. Energy absorbed by the other mechanisms show a higher ballistic limit velocity.
is not significant. It may be noted that, in this case,
Hybrid composites: It consist energy carried by the moving cone is negligible. 2.3.7 Hybrid composites: Ellis et al.8 studied
of two or more types of fibers The strain rate during ballistic impact event the ballistic impact resistance of Spectra™ hybrid
in a composite part.
was also reported by Pandya et al.47 The authors graphite composites. They observed a significant
observed that in compression, the strain rate was increase in energy absorption on adding Spectra™
high initially. During the event, strain rate of to the back face of the graphite composite. Muhi
4211/s was reported. A peak tensile strain rate of et al.38 compared E-glass fiber reinforced plastics
3141/s was also reported by the authors. and hybrid composites consisting of E-glass and
Experimental studies on ballistic impact Kevlar™-29 fabrics. They observed that penetration
behavior of composites were carried out by several resistance was enhanced by the addition of
groups19,26,36,52,65,68–70. Hazell and Appleby-Thomas21 Kevlar™-29 layers to E-glass layers. Hazell and
and Kasano27 (1999) presented reviews of ballistic Appleby-Thomas22 found significant improvement
impact behavior of composites. in ballistic performance of CFRP-based structures
Pandya et al.46 studied the effect of projectile upon addition of Kevlar™-29 layers to carbon
mass on ballistic limit of glass-epoxy composites. layers.
They found that ballistic limit reduced as Pandya et al.46 studied hybrids of Eglass-epoxy
the projectile mass increased. Gellert et al.14 laminated and carbon-epoxy laminates. Ballistic
conducted tests using hard-steel cylinders of two limit was highest for Eglass-epoxy laminates and
diameters and three nose shapes against glass- least for carbon-epoxy laminates; it was in between
fibre-reinforced (GRP) plastic composite plates for hybrid composites. The authors reported that
of various thicknesses. Bi-linear pattern of energy targets with Eglass layers in the exterior and carbon
absorption was observed. layers in the interior showed higher ballistic limit
Shahkarami et al.51 observe that materials with velocity than placing carbon layers in the exterior
high specific energy absorption characteristics and Eglass layers in the interior.
such as high strength, rupture strain and low
3D composites: They are density are considered ideal. They also observed 2.3.8 3D composites: Flanagan et al.10 studied
made from yarns or tows that transverse properties of the yarns affect the penetration resistance and failure modes of 3D
arranged into complex 3D
structures. A resin is applied interaction between projectile and target. The textile composites under high velocity impact
to the 3D preform to create authors also presented that an optimally twisted experimentally. They used both 3D woven and
the composite material. yarn structure will maximize strength. The braided composites for their studies. The materials
sensitivity to strain-rate and temperature was used were Spectra, Kevlar and Twaron. They
highlighted. The efforts focused on frictional observed that 3D textile composites have higher
properties of yarns to the behavior in impact zone, penetration resistance. They also observed that
and the global energy absorption mechanisms there was only limited growth of delamination
were also highlighted. because of the reinforcement in through-the-
In addition, the authors highlighted the thickness direction.
effect of fiber configuration. 3-dimensional Udatha et al.60 compared 3D woven composites
weaves were reported to have higher interlaminar with 2D plain weave composites of Eglass-epoxy.
fracture toughness and high damage tolerance The authors reported that limit velocity for
than 2-dimensional weaves. Further, it was noted complete penetration for 3D orthogonal woven
that weaving process degrades the yarns. They composite is higher than that for 2D plain weave
also presented the observations that brittle resin composite.
systems experience instantaneous delamination,
whereas tough systems experience steady and 3 Material Combinations for Armour
controlled delamination growth. Two different material combinations are reviewed,
ceramic-metal and ceramic-composite. The details
2.3.6 Performance comparison: Pandya et al.46 are included in the subsequent sub-sections.
compared the ballistic impact performance of
glass-epoxy versus carbon-epoxy laminates of the 3.1 Ceramic-metal
same thickness. They observed that the ballistic Initially, monolithic or layers of metal sheets
limit velocity (V50) of carbon-epoxy laminates was formed armour. Researchers observed that
17% lower than glass-epoxy. The authors reported ceramics have lower density, high stiffness and high
larger extent of damage in glass-epoxy than carbon- compressive strength. But they are weak in tension.

302 Journal of the Indian Institute of Science VOL 95:3 Jul.–Sep. 2015 journal.iisc.ernet.in
 Composite Armour—A Review

Hence, a metal plate with a ceramic face plate was in Figure 3); compression in the surrounding
studied to arrive at a design of armour lighter region referred as Region 2 (see Figure 3);
than monolithic metals. Such targets observed formation of ring cracks and radial cracks leading
substantial weight savings. Wilkins64 presented to tensile failure; shear plugging; pulverization;
studies on metal and ceramic-metal targets. and heat generation.
AD85™ alumina was bonded to aluminum alloy The major damage and energy-absorbing
6061-T6. The effect of alumina and aluminum mechanisms in the composite backing plate
thickness on ballistic limit was studied. A multi- are—compression of the target directly below
linear response was observed. Increase in ceramic the projectile referred as Region 1 (see Figure 3);
thickness caused a higher increase in ballistic compression in the surrounding region referred
limit than increase in aluminum thickness. as Region 2 (see Figure 3); tension in the yarns;
Futhermore, the effect of projectile shape was also shear plugging; delamination and matrix
evaluated. Blunt projectiles caused more damage cracking; bulge formation on the back face;
and penetration than sharp projectiles. friction between the target and the projectile;
Mayseless35 presented the experimental results and, heat generation.
for ceramic-metal targets. They found that on At higher incident impact velocities, erosion of
the basis of areal density, metal plates prefaced by the tip of the projectile would take place. As the
ceramic plates are ballistically inefficient in the velocity of the projectile decreases, deformation
low velocity range, while the reverse was found of the projectile would take place. Erosion and
at speeds higher than 250 m/s. They also found deformation of the projectile would absorb some
that the energy required to erode the projectile energy during ballistic impact event. This would
was several orders of magnitude more than that lead to reduction in velocity and kinetic energy of
consumed in the process of fracture of the ceramic the projectile.
plate. Figure 5 shows different damage and energy
absorption mechanisms in ceramic-composite
3.2 Ceramic-composite armors during ballistic impact event. The figures
Typical ceramic-composite armor is shown in show a cylindrical projectile. When the projectile
Figure 4. Naik et al.39 have identified that the strikes the target, the target would offer resistance
major energy absorption is provided by the for the penetration of the projectile into the target.
ceramic. In an ideal situation, the damage should As shown in Figure 5, the material directly below the
not spread to the composite backing plate. This projectile is called Region 1, while the surrounding
is because the composite plate should be able to material offering the resistance for penetration is
provide the structural requirements, and act as a called Region 2. As the projectile strikes the target,
load carrying element during post impact period longitudinal and shear stress waves are generated
even after damages have taken place in ceramic. and travel along all the directions.
The composite plate can also absorb energy, and Only that part of the target up to which these
in such cases, it can be damaged. The rubber layer waves have reached would offer the resistance for
in between the ceramic and the composite delays penetration. The remaining portion of the target
the penetration process, Also it prevents merging does not sense the applied impact load. As the
of damages within the ceramic and the composite. time progresses, the stress wave would propagate
The front composite cover layer prevents the further and larger part of the target would offer
ceramic from micro damages. resistance.
The major damage and energy-absorbing As the projectile strikes the target, the material
mechanisms in ceramic layer are—compression of directly below the projectile would be under
the target directly below the projectile, referred as compression. The material in the surrounding
Region 1 (schematically illustrated for composites region is also under compression along thickness
direction. If the induced compressive stress
exceeds the permissible limit, compressive
failure of ceramic would take place. The induced
compressive stress is calculated based on the
deformation in ceramic and the distance up to
which, through the thickness, the longitudinal
stress wave has traveled.
Additionally, because of the impact force
generated, shear stresses are also generated within
Figure 4: Typical ceramic-composite armour.
the target around the periphery of the projectile.

Journal of the Indian Institute of Science VOL 95:3 Jul.–Sep. 2015 journal.iisc.ernet.in 303
 Kiran Akella and Niranjan K. Naik

Figure 5: Different stages of penetration of a cylindrical projectile on ceramic-composite armour (Naik

et al., 2012).

The resistance for the shear failure would be As the projectile strikes the ceramic, micro
offered only by that part of the target up to which cracks would be formed in the ceramic. As the
the shear wave has reached. ballistic impact event progresses, the micro cracks
As the compression of the ceramic takes place could become macro cracks. During this phase
during the ballistic impact event directly below the additional micro cracks would be formed. In other
target, the ceramic along radial direction would be words, the ceramic would be broken into granules
under tension. This can lead to the formation of and later into powder. The compressive strength
ring cracks and radial cracks. of the ceramic powder is significantly higher

304 Journal of the Indian Institute of Science VOL 95:3 Jul.–Sep. 2015 journal.iisc.ernet.in
 Composite Armour—A Review

than that of the ceramic plate. This indicates that Figure 5(b). The distances traveled by different
as the penetration progresses, the compressive waves are also indicated in the figure. Penetration
resistance offered by the ceramic/ceramic powder of the projectile is shown in Figures 5(c) to (e).
would increase. The process of formation of fine Since compressive waves reach the back face of the
powdery particles from the ceramic plate is called composite backing plate through-the-thickness,
pulverization12. bulging of the composite takes place (Figure 5(f)).
Different damage mechanisms such as Plug formation can be seen in Figure 5(g). The
compression, shear plugging, tension and projectile and the plug start moving further
pulverization would lead to energy absorption. As as shown in Figure 5(h). Figure 5(i) shows the
the energy is absorbed by the target, kinetic energy projectile and the plug just exiting from the back
of the projectile would decrease accordingly. This face of the composite backing plate.
would lead to reduction in velocity of the projectile. Hetherington and Rajagopalan23 carried out
As the projectile strikes the target, resistance experiments on ceramic-composite targets with
would be offered by the target for penetration different target thicknesses. For the same incident
of the projectile onto the target. If the resistance ballistic impact parameters, they measured
offered by the target is more, erosion of the residual velocities of the projectile as a function
projectile could take place. This process also of target thickness. Navarro et al.40 carried out
would absorb some kinetic energy of the experimental studies on ballistic impact behavior
projectile leading to reduction in the velocity of of ceramic-composite armors.
the projectile. As the velocity decreases, erosion Shahkarami et al.51 reviewed the effect of
would stop and deformation of the projectile in-plane dimensions and thickness of target. As the
would take place. impact velocity increases, the effect of boundaries
As the ballistic impact event progresses, diminishes. They reviewed the transition
through the thickness, normal and shear mechanisms for thinner targets and thicker targets.
stress waves would enter into rubber layer and Thinner targets show dishing as a favourable
composite backing plate. With this, the composite penetration mechanism. For thicker targets, plug
backing plate as well as the rubber layer would formation is a favourable penetration mechanism.
offer resistance to penetration and perforation.
The energy-absorbing mechanisms in the rubber 3.3  erformance comparison of different
P
layer are compression and shear plugging. As the types of armour
through-the-thickness longitudinal stress wave Adams1 developed a ballistic performance map for
enters into the composite, compression would evaluating the performance of ceramic armour; the
take place in Region 1 as well as in Region 2 of author used a 3-axes plot. Two axes at the base were
the composite. Because of the impact force, shear areal densities ceramic and backing in the target,
stresses are generated in the composite around the vertical axis represented the impact velocity.
the periphery of the projectile. The yarns under A ballistic limit surface was plotted using on the
the projectile would be in tension. If the induced ballistic limit values, while the stochastic behavior is
compressive stress, shear stress or tensile stress visualized as the thickness of the surface. Protection
exceed the permissible limit, failure of composite areal density can be estimated using these plots.
would take place. Delamination, matrix cracking
and bulge formation on the back face of the 4 Armour Configurations
composite leading to possible tensile failure of the Composite armour design involves various
yarns are the other damage and energy-absorbing parameters that contribute to different
mechanisms. During the later part of the ballistic configurations, such as ceramic/backing thickness,
impact event, the velocity of the projectile is very shape of ceramics, geometry of the ceramic
low. During this period, frictional energy would tile edges, confinement, tile wrapping, stacking
be absorbed by the target. All these damage and sequence, impedance matching layers and ceramic
energy-absorbing mechanisms would absorb coated fabrics. The studies conducted to evaluate
some energy leading to further decrease in the the effect of each of these configurational changes
kinetic energy of the projectile. This would lead to are reviewed in the subsequent subsections.
further decrease in the velocity of the projectile.
Different stages of penetration of a cylindrical 4.1 Optimum ceramic/backing ratio
projectile on to the armor are shown in Figure 5. James25 presented a study on optimal ceramic/
Figure 5(a) shows the initial position when the metal thickness ratio. For normal impact of
projectile just hits the armor. Possible erosion 7.62 mm AP rounds, he suggested an optimal
and deformation of the projectile are shown in ratio of 1.28. He included an empirical model

Journal of the Indian Institute of Science VOL 95:3 Jul.–Sep. 2015 journal.iisc.ernet.in 305
 Kiran Akella and Niranjan K. Naik

to estimate the optimum backing for alumina/ investigated are shown in Figure 6. The author
aluminum armour systems using the relation, showed that an 8.5 mm tile with vertical edges
Tcer v subjected to impact at joint between two tiles
= (90 − α ),  (3) absorbs energy equivalent to a 6 mm tile subjected
Tmet 60000
to impact at the center. Tiles with 45° inclined edge
showed no degradation at the edges whereas all
where Tcer is the thickness of the ceramic layer, Tmet other configurations illustrated in Figure 6 showed
the thickness of the metallic layer, v the incident substantial degradation at the edge.
velocity and α the angle of obliquity with the
normal to the armour surface. The results were in 4.4 Effect of confinement
agreement with experiments. This model quantified Ernst et al.9 studied the effect of confinement. Glass
optimal ratio and its dependence on obliquity. It and alumina samples were tested and depth of
was found to be in agreement with experiments. penetration was measured. Unconfined specimens
showed that penetration reduced with higher
4.2 Shape of ceramics lateral dimensions of the specimen. Confined
Salame and Quefelec49 categorized different shapes specimen showed much lower penetration than
of ceramics as flat tiles and shaped ceramics. Flat unconfined specimen. The penetration of confined
tiles could be of square or hexagonal shape. Shaped ceramics could be matched by a three-fold increase
ceramic tiles can be in ball or cylinder form. in lateral dimensions of unconfined ceramics.
Different multi-curved forms are also being used.
4.5 Effect of wrapping
4.3 Effect of tile edge geometry Nemat-Nasser et al.42 studied the effect of
James25 studied the effect of tile edge geometry wrapping ceramic tiles with a thin membrane on
on energy absorption. Different edge profiles armour performance. Four wrapping materials

Figure 6: Edge configurations studied by James (2001).

306 Journal of the Indian Institute of Science VOL 95:3 Jul.–Sep. 2015 journal.iisc.ernet.in
 Composite Armour—A Review

were studied. They observed more than 20% Hand gun bullets are generally heavier, but
improvement in ballistic efficiency due to their velocities are lower. Rifle or small arm bullets
wrapping. are smaller in diameter but have much greater
velocity. Some guns provide twist in the firing
4.6 Stacking sequence barrel to stabilize the bullet.
Tasdemirci and Hall58 studied a baseline Shahkarami et al.51 reviewed studies conducted
material made of ceramic faceplate, Ethylene to obtain the influence of projectile shape on
propylene diene monomer (EPDM) rubber energy absorption and damage profile. The
or Teflon foam interlayer and a composite authors observed that projectile shape has a direct
backing plate. They compared the performance influence on energy absorption. The effect of
with four variants, namely, Variant 1: shape also varies with target thickness.
Interlayer at the middle of ceramic component; Ulven et al.62 presented experimental results
Variant 2: Interlayer at the middle of the composite on impact of bullets with different shapes on
component; Variant 3: Two interlayers, one at the carbon/epoxy laminates. Wen63 investigated the
middle of ceramic and another between ceramic penetration and perforation of fiber-reinforced
and composite component; Variant 4: Three plastic laminates by rigid projectiles with different
interlayers, two same as in variant 3, and third at nose shapes.
the middle of the composite component. They
observed that peak stress dropped from ∼500 MPa 6 Design Considerations
in baseline to ∼350 MPa in variant 3 and ∼200 Based on the aforementioned studies, the inferred
MPa in variant 4. Stress rise was also delayed in considerations for efficient design of armour are
variant 3 and 4 in comparison with baseline. discussed in this section. In Section 6.1, issues
related to choice of ceramic material are presented
4.7 Effect of impedance matching layers and those related to composites are presented in
James25 studied the effects of impedance matching Section 6.2. Design issues for ceramic-composite
layers between ceramic and metal layers. Reduced armour and its configurations are included in
damage was reported by him due the presence of a Section 6.3.
thin impedance matching layer.
6.1 Ceramics
4.8 Ceramic coated fabrics The design considerations for choice of ceramic
Niessen and Gadow41 and Gadow and Neissen11 materials are enumerated as follows:
used thermal spray coating processes for coating
oxide ceramics on temperature sensitive fiber 1. Some of the widely used ceramics for armour
substrates. In this process the coated fabrics applications are Al2O3, AlN, B4C, SiC, TiB2
retained their flexibility. Penetration work on and WC.
Alumina coated twaron fabric was found to be 2. No significant change in volume over RHA is
five-fold on that on uncoated fabric. observed when low density ceramics are used.
However, mass reduction by more than one-
5 Projectile/Bullet Materials half is reported.
and Configurations 3. The reduction in mass is most promising for
Bhatnagar5 summarized some of the common B4C and TiB2. It is one-third of RHA.
bullets. The author classified them as handgun 4. High density ceramics can be used when there
bullets, fragment simulating projectiles and small is a severe constraint of space. The thickness of
arms bullets. Bullets usually have aerodynamic WC is less than one-half of RHA thickness.
shape to reduce drag. Handgun bullets are usually 5. Normalised penetration versus impact velocity
covered with a metal jacket for durability and curve was found to be independent of the
protection of material inside the bullet; the jacket ceramic material.
is typically made of copper and core is usually 6. Properties of ceramics can be enhanced by
lead. Metal jackets improve penetrating ability of using ceramic-composites.
the bullets. 7. Using submicron powders with smaller grains,
Fragment simulating projectiles (FSP) simulate performance of ceramics can be improved.
a variety of fragments of different shape and size. 8. Alternative processing methods such as
Small arms bullets have jackets made of gilding reaction-bonding and pressure-less sintering
metal or copper. These metals can also be plated of ceramics can match the performance of
on steel. Inside the jacket, the bullet may have lead, conventional ceramics at lower processing
soft steel or a hard steel core. costs.

Journal of the Indian Institute of Science VOL 95:3 Jul.–Sep. 2015 journal.iisc.ernet.in 307
 Kiran Akella and Niranjan K. Naik

6.2 Composites 2. Ceramics can included as flat tiles or shaped

The design considerations for choice of composite ceramics. Flat tiles could be of square or
materials are enumerated as follows: hexagonal shape. Shaped ceramic tiles can
be in ball or cylinder form. Different multi-
1. Some of the widely used fiber materials are curved forms are also being used.
glass, carbon, aramid and HMPE 3. 45° tile chamfer showed no degradation at the
2. Matrix materials used can either be edges.
thermoplastic or thermoset. 4. Confined specimen showed much lower
3. The layers can be in prepreg form or in dry penetration than unconfined specimen. The
fabric form. Dry fabrics can be woven or non- penetration of confined ceramics could be
woven matched by a three-fold increase in lateral
4. Strain rate during the event can be about 3000 dimensions of unconfined ceramics.
to 4000. 5. Wrapping of ceramic tiles improved the
5. In thin composites, moving cone absorbs ballistic efficiency more than 20%.
energy while in thick composites; negligible 6. Reduced damage is seen due the presence of a
Impedance: It is the product energy is absorbed by the moving cone. thin impedance matching layer.
of density and velocity of Other energy absorbing mechanisms are 7. Penetration work on Alumina-coated twaron
sound in the medium. The
value of impedance of two shear plugging, stretching, tensile failure and fabric was found to be five-fold on that on
adjoining layers subjected to friction between the projectile and the target. uncoated fabric.
stress waves due to impact 6. Ballistic limit reduces as projectile mass
will decide the amount stress
transmitted and reflected. increases. 7 Future Directions
By varying the impedance of 7. Materials with high specific energy absorption Some of promising future directions such as
different layers, performance characteristics such as high strength, rupture advanced manufacturing concepts, CNT reinforced
of targets subjected to impact
can be altered. strain and low density are considered ideal. ceramics, layered ceramics and, nano-particle
8. 3-dimensional weaves were reported to have reinforced composites are reviewed in this section.
higher interlaminar fracture toughness and
high damage tolerance than 2-dimensional 7.1 Advanced concepts of manufacturing
weaves. McCuiston et al.31 studied advanced concepts
9. Brittle resin systems experience instantaneous like solid freeform fabrication or layered
delamination, whereas tough systems experience manufacturing for armour manufacturing. The
steady and controlled delamination growth. authors observed that these methods are free of
10. Ballistic limit velocity (V50) of carbon-epoxy the normal constraints imposed by conventional
laminates was 17% lower than glass-epoxy. manufacturing. Designs for internally reinforced
Larger extent of damage is observed in glass- ceramic metal armour composite were presented,
epoxy than carbon-epoxy. Consequently, along with concepts for ceramics reinforced with
glass-epoxy laminates absorb higher energy metal strips and metal matrix reinforced with
than carbon-epoxy and therefore show a multiscale spheres. Four-point bend strength
Ballistic limit: The ballistic higher ballistic limit velocity. and fracture toughness substantially higher
limit is the velocity required 11. Penetration resistance can be enhanced by than conventional ceramics, and solid freeform
for a particular projectile to
reliably penetrate a particular using hybrids. fabrication techniques such as stereolithography,
piece of material and exit 12. 3D textile composites have higher penetration 3-D printing, selective laser sintering, robocasting
with zero veloctiy. In other resistance and limited growth of delamination and fused deposition of ceramics were reported.
words, a given projectile will
not pierce a given target when because of the reinforcement in through-the-
the projectile velocity is lower thickness direction. 7.2 Alumina ceramics with CNT
than the ballistic limit. 13. Limit velocity for complete penetration for reinforcement
3D orthogonal woven composite is higher Sennett50 studied hot pressed ceramics made by
than that for 2D plain weave composite. mixing nanoscale alumina powder and carbon
nanotubes. They found improvement in strength
and fracture toughness.
Hot pressing: It is a high- 6.3 Configurations
pressure, low-strain-rate
process for forming of a The design considerations for choice of ceramic- 7.3 Layered ceramics
powder at high temperature composite armour configurations are enumerated Three-layered and nine-layered B4C-SiC ceramics
to induce sintering. Parts are as follows: have been developed by Orlovskaya et al.43 The
made by the simultaneous
application of heat process to make such ceramic laminates using
and pressure. 1. Optimal ceramic/metal thickness ratio is 1.28 rolling and hot-pressing was demonstrated in this
for 7.62 mm AP rounds. study. By adjusting the thickness of the component

308 Journal of the Indian Institute of Science VOL 95:3 Jul.–Sep. 2015 journal.iisc.ernet.in
 Composite Armour—A Review

layers, a desirable state of high compressive cores absorbed about 20% more kinetic energy
residual stresses and low tensile residual stresses than those without cores. The corresponding
was achieved. increase in ballistic limit was around 12%.
Holmquist et al.24 developed a constitutive Avila et al.4 studied the ballistic impact
model of AlN based on the Johnson-Holmquist performance of nanoclay and nanographite
model. The constants of the material model dispersed plain weave glass-epoxy composites. The
were obtained using laboratory and ballistic addition of nanoclay and graphene nanosheets
experiments. The effect of layers was studied by to fiber glass-epoxy laminates increased the high
them. Specimens with 1, 2, 3 and 6-layer ceramic velocity impact resistance of the composites.
targets were evaluated. Continuous degradation Morka and Jackowska37 carried out numerical
in penetration resistance as the number of layers investigations to determine the ballistic resistance
increases was reported. of CNT reinforced composites. They performed
Yadav and Ravichandran66 conducted an computer simulations using finite element method
experimental study on ceramic tiles laminated implemented in LS-DYNA code, and the results
with thin layer of polymer in-between. They indicated a significant role of CNT fibers in the
reported more resistance offered by specimens overall ballistic resistance of the composite plate.
with 3 tiles than monolithic ceramics. However, Pandya et al.45 studied ballistic impact behavior
specimen with 6 tiles offered less resistance. of carbon nanotube and nanosilica dispersed resin
Tasdemirci and Hall58 studied the performance and composites. They observed about 7% increase
of four variants layered composite armour of in ballistic limit and about 14% increase in energy
which two variants had monolithic ceramics, absorbed due to the addition of nanofillers.
and the remaining two variants had two layers of
ceramics each. Delay in the rise of stress and drop 8 Concluding Remarks
in peak stress was observed due the presence of In this review paper, some aspects of composite
interlayers. armour are reviewed. Low density ceramics were
Based on the results reported in literature on found to offer substantial weight gain and high
layered ceramic armour, we observed that utility of density ceramics offered substantial volume gain in
layers in ceramics is not established. It has been seen comparison with RHA. Composite materials with
that more layers degrade performance. Improved high specific energy absorption characteristics such
attenuation of the stress wave in the impacted area as high strength, rupture strain and low density
due to the presence of layers was also reported. are considered ideal. Wrapping and confinement
of ceramics offer significant improvement. Future
7.4 Nanoparticle dispersed composites trends for development of lighter armour involving
Grujicic et al.18 studied the ballistic performance nanofillers, ceramic-composites, hybrids and 3D
optimization of a hybrid CNT Eglass reinforced composites are promising, and can offer further
poly-vinyl-ester-epoxy-matrix composite armor. lighter armour solutions.
Different designs of the hybrid armor were
obtained by varying the location and the thickness 9 Notations and Abbreviations
of the CNT reinforced composite mats. The results 2D Two- dimensional
obtained indicated that at a fixed thickness of the 3D Three-dimensional
armor, both the position and the thickness of the AP Armour piercing
CNT reinforced composite mats, affect the ballistic α Angle of obliquity with the normal to the
performance of the armor. armour surface
Makeev and Srivastava30 studied the dynamic DOP Depth of penetration
response properties of CNT/a-SiC composite EPDM Ethylene propylene diene monomer
targets subjected to hypersonic velocity impacts FRP Fiber reinforced polymer
by diamond nanometer-size projectiles through FSAPDS Fin stabilized armour piercing discarding
molecular dynamics simulations. They observed sabot
that the presence of CNTs cause significant FSP Fragment simulating projectiles
damping of the impact induced shock wave. HMPE High modulus polyethylene
Uddin et al.61 reported improvement in the Mg Mass gain
ballistic performance of polyurethane foam due to PAN Poly-acrylo-nitrile
reinforcement with TiO2 nanoparticles. Sandwich PBI Poly-benzimidazole
panels were made using reinforced foams and PBO Polyphenylene-benzobisozazole
impacted with fragment simulating projectiles. Test PRHA Penetration of the projectile in plain
results indicated that sandwich with nanophased RHA target

Journal of the Indian Institute of Science VOL 95:3 Jul.–Sep. 2015 journal.iisc.ernet.in 309
 Kiran Akella and Niranjan K. Naik

Pres Penetration in RHA when ceramic tile of 10. M.P. Flanagan, M.A. Zikry and J.W. Wall, Experimental
thickness Tcer is placed before it investigation of high velocity impact and penetration
RB Reaction bonded failure modes in textile composites, Journal of Composite
RHA Rolled homogenous armour Materials, 33, 1080–1103 (1999).
ρRHA Density of RHA 11. R. Gadow and K.V. Neissen, Lightweight ballistic structures
ρcer Density of ceramics made of ceramic and cermet/aramide composites,
Tcer Thickness of ceramic layer Proceedings of the ceramic armour and armour systems
Tmet Thickness of metal layer symposium, 105 Annual Meeting of the American Ceramic
Vg Volume gain Society, USA, 3–18 (2003).
v Velocity of the projectile 12. B.A. Gailly and H.D. Espinosa, Modeling of failure mode
transition in ballistic penetration with a continuum model
Acknowledgements describing micro cracking and flow of pulverized media,
The authors acknowledge Defence Research and International Journal of Numerical Methods in Engineering,
Development Organisation and IIT Bombay for 54(3), 365–398 (2002).
providing support to conduct this work. 13. B.A. Galanov, O.N. Grigoriev, S.M. Ivanov and V.V.
Kartuzov, Structure and properties of shock-resistant
Received 8 June 2015. ceramics developed at the institute for problems in
materials science, NAS of Ukraine, Proceedings of the
References ceramic armour materials by design symposium, Pac
1. M.A. Adams, Theory and experimental test method for Rim IV conference on advanced ceramics and glass, USA,
evaluating ceramic armor components, Proceedings of 73–82 (2001).
the ceramic armour materials by design symposium, Pac 14. E.P. Gellert, S.J. Cimpoeru and R.L. Woodward, A study of
Rim IV conference on advanced ceramics and glass, USA, the effect of target thickness on the ballistic performance
139–150 (2001). of glass-fibre-reinforced plastic composites, International
2. J.W. Adams, G.A. Glide and M. Burkins, Microstructure Journal of Impact Engineering, 24, 445–456 (2000).
development of aluminum oxide/titanium diboride 15. R.F. Gibson, Principles of composite material mechanics,
composites for penetration resistance, Proceedings of 2nd ed., CRC Press, 1–35 (1994).
the ceramic armour materials by design symposium, Pac 16. W.A. Gooch, An overview of ceramic armour applications,
Rim IV conference on advanced ceramics and glass, USA, Proceedings of the ceramic armour materials by design
629–634 (2001). symposium, Pac Rim IV conference on advanced ceramics
3. M.K. Aghajanian, B.N. Morgan, J.R. Singh, J. Mears and and glass, USA, 3–22 (2001).
R.A. Wolffe, A new family of reaction bonded ceramics for 17. W.A. Gooch and M.S. Burkins, Ballistic development of
armour applications, Proceedings of the ceramic armour US high density tungsten carbide ceramics, Proceedings
materials by design symposium, Pac Rim IV conference of the ceramic armour materials by design symposium,
on advanced ceramics and glass, USA, 527–540 (2001). Pac Rim IV conference on advanced ceramics and glass,
4. A.F. Avila, A.S. Neto and H. Nascimento Jr., Hybrid USA, 53–62 (2001).
nanocomposites for mid-range ballistic protection, 18. M. Grujicic, W.C. Bell, L.L. Thompson, K.L. Koudela and B.A.
International Journal of Impact Engineering, 38, 669–675, Cheeseman, Ballistic-protection performance of carbon-
(2011). nanotube-doped-poly-vinyl-ester-epoxy matrix composite
5. A. Bhatnagar, Bullets, fragments and bullet deformation, armour reinforced with E-glass fiber mats, Materials Science
In A. Bhatnagar (Ed.), Lightweight ballistic composites, and Engineering: A, 479(1–2), 10–22 (2008).
Woodhead Publishing, 29–71 (2006). 19. X. Haijun, L. Lulu and C. Guangtao, Impact response
6. A. Bhatnagar, B. Arvidson and W. Pataki, Prepreg ballistic and damage evolution of triaxial braided carbon/epoxy
composites, In A. Bhatnagar (Ed.), Lightweight ballistic composites, Part I: Ballistic impact testing, Textile Research
composites, Woodhead Publishing, 272–304 (2006). Journal, 83, 1703–1716 (2013).
7. W.D. Callister, Materials science and engineering: An 20. A. Hannibal and R. Weir, Ballistic material processing,
introduction, 4th ed., Wiley, 383–424 (2003). In A. Bhatnagar (Ed.), Lightweight ballistic composites,
8. R.L. Ellis, F. Lalande and H.Y. Jia, Ballistic impact Woodhead Publishing, 305–335 (2006).
resistance of SMA and Spectra hybrid composites, 21. P.J. Hazell and G.J. Appleby-Thomas, The impact of
Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, 17, 147–164 structural composite materials, Part 1: Ballistic impact,
(1998). The Journal of Strain Analysis for Engineering Design, 47,
9. H.-J. Ernst, W. Volker and T. Wolf, Armour ceramics 396–405 (2012).
under high-velocity impact of a medium caliber long-rod 22. P.J. Hazell and G.J. Appleby-Thomas, A study on the
penetrator, Proceedings of the ceramic armour materials energy dissipation of several different CFRP based targets
by design symposium, Pac Rim IV conference on advanced completely penetrated by a high velocity projectile,
ceramics and glass, USA, 23–32 (2001). Composite Structures, 91, 103–110 (2009).

310 Journal of the Indian Institute of Science VOL 95:3 Jul.–Sep. 2015 journal.iisc.ernet.in
 Composite Armour—A Review

23. J.G. Hetherington and B.P. Rajagopalan, An investigation 37. A. Morka and B. Jackowska, Ballistic resistance of the carbon
into the energy absorbed during ballistic perforation nanotube fibres reinforced composites–numerical study,
of composite armours, International Journal of Impact Computational Materials Science, 50, 1244–1249 (2011).
Engineering, 11(1), 33–40 (1991). 38. R.J. Muhi, F. Najim and M.F.S.F. de-Moura, The effect of
24. T.J. Holmquist, D.W. Templeton and K.D. Bishnoi, hybridization on the GFRP behavior under high velocity
Constitutive modeling of aluminum nitride for large strain, impact, Composites Part B-Engineering, 40, 798–803 (2009).
high strain-rate, and high pressure applications, International 39. N.K. Naik, S. Kumar, D. Ratnaveer, M. Joshi and K. Akella,
Journal of Impact Engineering, 25, 211–231 (2001). An energy-based model for ballistic impact analysis
25. A. James, Practical issues in ceramic armour design: of ceramic-composite armors, International Journal of
Proceedings of the ceramic armour materials by design Damage Mechanics, 22(2), 145–187, (2012).
symposium, Pac Rim IV conference on advanced ceramics 40. C. Navarro, M.A. Martinez and R. Cortes, Some
and glass, USA, 33–44 (2001). observations on the normal impact on ceramic faced
26. X. Jia, B. Sun and B. Gu, A numerical simulation on armours backed by composite plates, International Journal
ballistic penetration damage of 3D orthogonal woven of Impact Engineering, 13(1), 145–156 (1993).
fabric at microstructure level, International Journal of 41. K.V. Niessen and R. Gadow, Flexible ceramic coated fiber
Damage Mechanics, 21, 237–266 (2012). fabrics for light weight protection systems, Proceedings of
27 H. Kasano, Recent advances in high velocity impact the ceramic armour materials by design symposium, Pac
perforation of fiber composite laminates, JSME Rim IV conference on advanced ceramics and glass, USA,
International Journal, 42, 147–157 (1999). 541–550 (2001).
28. W. Lanz, Initial tests on ceramics in composite armour, 42. S. Nemat-Nasser, S. Sarva, J.B. Isaacs and D.W. Lischer,
Proceedings of the ceramic armour materials by design Novel ideas in multi-functional ceramic armour design,
symposium, Pac Rim IV conference on advanced ceramics Proceedings of the ceramic armour materials by design
and glass, USA, 63–72 (2001). symposium, Pac Rim IV conference on advanced ceramics
29. T.M. Lillo, D.W. Bailey, D.A. Laughton, H.S. Chu and W.M. and glass, USA, 511–526 (2001).
Harrison, Development of a pressure-less sintered silicon 43. N. Orlovskaya, M. Lugovy, V. Subbotin, O. Rachenko, J.
carbide monolith and special-shaped silicon carbide whisker Adams, M. Chheda, J. Shih, J. Sankar and S. Yarmolenko,
reinforced silicon carbide matrix composite for lightweight Design and manufacturing of B4C-SiC layered ceramics for
armor application, Proceedings of the ceramic armour and armour applications, Proceedings of the ceramic armour
armour systems symposium, 105 Annual Meeting of the and armour systems symposium, 105 Annual Meeting of
American Ceramic Society, USA, 49–58 (2003). the American Ceramic Society, USA, 59–70 (2003).
30. A. Makeev and D. Srivastava, Molecular dynamics 44. D.L. Orphal, Long rod penetration of ceramics,
simulations of hypersonic velocity impact protection Proceedings of the ceramic armour materials by design
properties of CNT/a-SiC composites, Composites Science symposium, Pac Rim IV conference on advanced ceramics
and Technology, 68(12), 2451–2455 (2008). and glass, USA, 151–164 (2001).
31. R.C. McCuiston, S.C. Danforth, M.J. Mattewson and D.E. 45. K.S. Pandya, K. Akella, M. Joshi and N.K. Naik, Ballistic
Niesz, Solid freeform fabrication of advanced armour impact behaviour of carbon nanotube and nanosilica
concepts: Opportunities for design and manufacture, dispersed resin and composites, Journal of Applied Physics,
Proceedings of the ceramic armour materials by design AIP, 112, 113522_1–8 (2012).
symposium, Pac Rim IV conference on advanced ceramics 46. K.S. Pandya, J.R. Pothnis, G. Ravikumar and N.K. Naik,
and glass, USA, 473–484, (2001). Ballistic impact behaviour of hybrid composites, Materials
32. E. Medvedoski, Armour alumina ceramics, Proceedings of and Design, Elsevier, 44, 128–135 (2013).
the ceramic armour materials by design symposium, Pac 47. K.S. Pandya, Ch.V. Sesha Kumar, N.S. Nair, P.S. Patil
Rim IV conference on advanced ceramics and glass, USA, and N.K. Naik, Analytical and experimental studies on
91–102 (2001). ballistic impact behavior of 2D woven fabric composites,
33. E. Medvedoski, Silicon carbide-based ceramics for International Journal of Damage Mechanics, Sage
ballistic protection, Proceedings of the ceramic armour publications, in Press, published online (2014).
and armour systems symposium, 105 Annual Meeting of 48. P.-F. Peron, Ballistic development of tungsten carbide
the American Ceramic Society, USA, 19–36 (2001). ceramics for armour applications, Proceedings of the
34. R.A. Meyers, Dynamic behavior of materials, John Wiley ceramic armour materials by design symposium, Pac
and Sons, USA, 597–607 (1994). Rim IV conference on advanced ceramics and glass, USA,
35. M. Mayseless, Impact of ceramic targets, Journal of Applied 45–52, (2001).
Mechanics, 54, 373–378 (1987). 49. J.M. Salame and B. Quefelec, Ceramic-faced molded
36. R.A.W. Mines, A.M. Roach and N. Jones, High velocity armour, In A. Bhatnagar (Ed.), Lightweight ballistic
perforation behavior of polymer composite laminates, composites, Woodhead Publishing, 398–415 (2006).
International Journal of Impact Engineering, 22, 561–588, 50. M. Sennett, Improved performance of alumina ceramics
(1999). with carbon nanotube reinforcement, Proceedings of

Journal of the Indian Institute of Science VOL 95:3 Jul.–Sep. 2015 journal.iisc.ernet.in 311
 Kiran Akella and Niranjan K. Naik

the ceramic armour materials by design symposium, Pac woven composites, Journal of Strain Analysis of Engineering
Rim IV conference on advanced ceramics and glass, USA, Design, Sage publishers, 47(7), 419–431 (2012).
551–556 (2001). 61. M.F. Uddin, H. Mahfuz, S. Zainuddin and S. Jeelani,
51. A. Shahkarami, E. Cepus, R. Vaziri and A. Poursartip, Improving ballistic performance of polyurethane foam
Material responses to ballistic impact, In A. Bhatnagar by nanoparticle reinforcement, Journal of Nanotechnology,
(Ed.), Lightweight ballistic composites, Woodhead 794740_1–8 (2009).
Publishing, 72–100 (2006). 62. C. Ulven, U.K. Vaidya and M.V. Hosur, Effect of projectile
52. S. Shaktivesh, N.S. Nair and C. Sesha Kumar, Ballistic shape during ballistic perforation of VARTM carbon/
impact performance of composite targets, Materials and epoxy composite panels, Composite Structures, 61(1-2),
Design, 51, 833–846 (2013). 143–150 (2003).
53. D.A. Shockey and A.H. Marchand, Failure phenomenology 63. H.M. Wen, Predicting the penetration and perforation
of confined ceramic targets and impacting rods, of FRP laminates struck normally by projectiles with
Proceedings of the ceramic armour materials by design different nose shapes, Composite Structures, 49(3), 321–
symposium, Pac Rim IV conference on advanced ceramics 329 (2000).
and glass, USA, 385–402 (2001). 64. M.L. Wilkins, Mechanics of penetration and perforation,
54. J.W. Song, Fabrics and composites for ballistic protection International Journal of Engineering Science, 16, 793–807
of personnel, In A. Bhatnagar (Ed.), Lightweight ballistic (1978).
composites, Woodhead Publishing, 210–239 (2006). 65. E. Wu and L.C. Chang, Woven glass-epoxy laminates
55. R.F. Speyer and H. Lee, Improved pressure-less subjected to projectile impact, International Journal of
densification of B4C, Proceedings of the ceramic armour Impact Engineering, 16, 607–619 (1995).
and armour systems symposium, 105 Annual Meeting of 66. S. Yadav and G. Ravichandran, Penetration resistance
the American Ceramic Society, USA, 71–82 (2003). of laminated ceramic/polymer structures, International
56. E. Strassburger and B. Lexow, Ceramic armour with Journal of Impact Engineering, 28, 557–574 (2003).
submicron alumina against armour piercing projectiles, 67. E. Zaretsky, N. Frage and M.P. Dariel, Dynamic failure
Proceedings of the ceramic armour materials by design and fracture of TiC-Steel composite; Proceedings of the
symposium, Pac Rim IV conference on advanced ceramics ceramic armour and armour systems symposium, 105
and glass, USA, 83–90 (2001). Annual Meeting of the American Ceramic Society, USA;
57. T. Tam and A. Bhatnagar, High performance ballistic fibers, 117–128 (2003).
In A. Bhatnagar (Ed.), Lightweight ballistic composites, 68. R.H. Zee and C.Y. Hsieh, Energy absorption process in
Woodhead Publishing, 189–209 (2006). fibrous composites, Materials Science and Engineering,
58. A. Tasdemirci and I.W. Hall, Development of novel A-Structure, 246, 161–168 (1998).
multilayer materials for impact applications, A combined 69. A. Zhang, Y. Sun, L. Chen, et al., Influence of fabric
numerical and experimental approach, Materials and structure and thickness on the ballistic impact behavior
Design, Elsevier, 30, 1533–1541 (2009). of ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene composite
59. H.L. Thomas, Non-woven ballistic composites, In A. laminate, Materials and Design, 54, 315–322 (2014).
Bhatnagar (Ed.), Lightweight ballistic composites, 70. G. Zhu, W. Goldsmith and C.H. Dharan, Penetration
Woodhead Publishing, 240–271 (2006). of laminated Kevlar by projectiles-I. Experimental
60. P. Udatha, Ch.V. Sesha Kumar, N.S. Nair and N.K. Naik, investigation, International Journal of Solids and Structures,
High velocity impact performance of three-dimensional 29, 339–420 (1992).

Shri Kiran Akella is currently the head of Professor Niranjan Krishna Naik with
computational mechanics center at R&DE(E), 43 years of experience as a faculty in Aerospace
a pune based lab of DRDO. He has over Engineering Department has made major
12 years experience in design and development contributions to teaching, research and
of various composite structures for military development at IIT Bombay. In recognition
applications. His areas of interest are: nonlinear finite of his contributions, he has been elected as a Fellow of
element modeling, structural dynamics and modeling of the National Academy of Sciences, India and Fellow of the
ballistic impact. He is a graduate in civil engineering from Indian National Academy of Engineering. Further, he has
VNIT Nagpur and M.Tech in structural engineering from been conferred Professor H.H. Mathur Award for Excellence
IIT Kanpur. in Research in Applied Sciences 2006 by IIT Bombay. Prof.
Naik has been awarded Excellence in Aerospace Education
Award 2008 by the Aeronautical Society of India. His
main fields of research are: textile composites, low velocity
impact, ballistic impact, high strain rate behaviour of
materials and fatigue and fracture of composites. He has
more than 120 research papers published in international
archival journals. He has written a book on “Woven Fabric
Composites” and contributed chapters to five other books.

312 Journal of the Indian Institute of Science VOL 95:3 Jul.–Sep. 2015 journal.iisc.ernet.in

View publication stats