Probability Tree Diagrams (H)
Probability Tree Diagrams (H)
com
.............................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................
(1)
Julie then throws a fair red dice once and a fair blue dice once.
Red Blue
Dice Dice
1
Six
6
Not
Six
(3)
(Total 4 marks)
.....................................................................................................................................
.....................................................................................................................................
(1)
Julie then throws a fair red dice once and a fair blue dice once.
Red Blue
Dice Dice
1
Six
6
Not
Six
(3)
(c) (i) Julie throws a fair red dice once and a fair blue dice once. Calculate the probability
that Julie gets a six on both the red dice and the blue dice.
....................................
(ii) Calculate the probability that Julie gets at least one six.
.....................................
(5)
(Total 9 marks)
EDEX
CD NOT-EDEX
0.6 ..........
CD
EDEX
CD
..........
.......... NOT-EDEX
CD
.......... NOT-EDEX
CD
(2)
(b) Calculate the mean playing time of the 5 CDs that Amy sold.
......................... minutes
(3)
(Total 5 marks)
EDEX
CD NOT-EDEX
0.6 ..........
CD
EDEX
CD
..........
.......... NOT-EDEX
CD
.......... NOT-EDEX
CD
(2)
(b) Find the probability that Amy will pick two Edex CDs.
.....................
(2)
(c) Calculate the mean playing time of the 5 CDs that Amy sold.
......................... minutes
(3)
(Total 7 marks)
The probability that Gary will win any game against Mijan is 0.55
The probability that Gary will win draw game against Mijan is 0.3
(a) Work out the probability that Gary will win exactly one of the two games against Mijan.
..................................
(3)
(b) Work out the probability that after two games, Gary’s total score will be the same as
Mijan’s total score.
..................................
(3)
(Total 6 marks)
6. Amy is going to play one game of snooker and one game of billiards.
3
The probability that she will win the game of snooker is
4
1
The probability that she will win the game of billiards is
3
(Total 2 marks)
7. Amy is going to play one game of snooker and one game of billiards.
3
The probability that she will win the game of snooker is
4
1
The probability that she will win the game of billiards is
3
(2)
(b) Work out the probability that Amy will win exactly one game.
…………………….
(3)
Amy played one game of snooker and one game of billiards on a number of Fridays.
She won at both snooker and billiards on 21 Fridays.
(c) Work out an estimate for the number of Fridays on which Amy did not win either game.
…………………….
(3)
(Total 8 marks)
Red
2
7
Red
3
5
......
Blue
Red
......
......
Blue
......
Blue
(Total 2 marks)
Red
2
7
Red
3
5
......
Blue
Red
......
......
Blue
......
Blue
(2)
(b) Work out the probability that Loren takes one counter of each colour.
...............................................
(3)
(Total 5 marks)
10. Simon plays one game of tennis and one game of snooker.
3
The probability that Simon will win at tennis is
4
1
The probability that Simon will win at snooker is
3
tennis snooker
1 Simon
3 wins
Simon
wins
3
4 Simon
.......... does not
win
Simon
.......... wins
Simon
.......... does not
win
Simon
.......... does not
win
(Total 2 marks)
11. Simon plays one game of tennis and one game of snooker.
3
The probability that Simon will win at tennis is
4
1
The probability that Simon will win at snooker is
3
tennis snooker
1 Simon
3 wins
Simon
wins
3
4 Simon
.......... does not
win
Simon
.......... wins
Simon
.......... does not
win
Simon
.......... does not
win
(2)
(b) Work out the probability that Simon wins both games.
.....................................
(2)
(c) Work out the probability that Simon will win only one game.
.....................................
(3)
(Total 7 marks)
(2)
(b) Work out the probability that the drawing pin will land ‘point up’ both times.
.....................................
(2)
(Total 4 marks)
13. There are two sets of traffic lights on Georgina’s route to school.
The probability that the first set of traffic lights will be red is 0.4
The probability that the second set of traffic lights will be red is 0.3
(2)
(b) Work out the probability that both sets of traffic lights will be red.
.....................................
(2)
(c) Work out the probability that exactly one set of traffic lights will be red.
.....................................
(3)
(Total 7 marks)
Saturday Sunday
Classical
...........
........... Folk
Classical
........... Jazz
0.58
Classical
...........
0.22 ...........
Folk Folk
........... Jazz
Classical
........... ...........
Jazz ........... Folk
...........
Jazz
(b) Calculate the probability that Julie will choose a jazz CD on both Saturday and
Sunday.
...................................
(2)
(c) Calculate the probability that Julie will choose at least one jazz CD on Saturday and
Sunday.
...................................
(3)
(Total 7 marks)
The probability that Tom will pass the driving test is 0.8
The probability that Sam will pass the driving test is 0.6
Tom Sam
0.6 Pass
Pass
0.8
............... Fail
0.6 Pass
...............
Fail
............... Fail
(2)
(b) Work out the probability that both Tom and Sam will pass the driving test.
.......................................................
(2)
(c) Work out the probability that only one of them will pass the driving test.
.......................................................
(3)
(Total 7 marks)
3
8 Red
3 Red
8
........ Blue
........ Red
........
Blue
........ Blue
(2)
(b) Work out the probability that Matthew takes two red counters.
..........................
(2)
(Total 4 marks)
............... Win
...............
Win Draw
Lose
0.5 ...............
............... Win
0.3 ...............
Draw Draw
Lose
...............
...............
Lose Draw
Lose
...............
(2)
(b) Work out the probability that Vishi will win both games.
.....................................
(2)
(Total 4 marks)
Pat
late
0.6
Julie
late
0.2
not
late
late
not
late
not
late
(2)
(b) Work out the probability that Julie and Pat will both arrive late.
……………………………
(2)
(Total 4 marks)
The probability that her train will be late on any day is 0.3
(a) Complete the probability tree diagram for Monday and Tuesday.
Monday Tuesday
0.3 late
late
0.3
not
late
late
not
late
not
late
(2)
(b) Work out the probability that her train will be late on at least one of these two days.
……………………………
(3)
(Total 5 marks)
Bag P Bag Q
Bag P Bag Q
green
3 green
7
yellow
green
red
yellow
(2)
(b) Calculate the probability that Jacob will take 2 green sweets.
………………….
(2)
(Total 4 marks)
21. Amy is going to play one game of snooker and one game of billiards.
1
The probability that she will win the game of snooker is
3
3
The probability that she will win the game of billiards is
4
The probability tree diagram shows this information.
Amy played one game of snooker and one game of billiards on a number of Fridays.
She won at both snooker and billiards on 21 Fridays.
Work out an estimate for the number of Fridays on which Amy did not win either game.
…………
(Total 3 marks)
Lucy Jessica
pass
0.4
pass
0.7
fail
pass
fail
fail
(2)
(b) Work out the probability that only one of the 2 girls will pass the test.
..............................
(3)
(Total 5 marks)
3 boy
10 ............ girl
boy
............
............ girl
girl
............
(2)
(b) Work out the probability that Mrs Gold selects two girls.
.....................................
(2)
(Total 4 marks)
3
The probability that he will win at darts is
7
6
The probability that he will win at snooker is
11
Darts Snooker
6
11 Win
3
7 Win
.............. Win
Not Win
..............
Not Win
..............
(Total 2 marks)
25. There are 3 strawberry yoghurts, 2 peach yoghurts and 4 cherry yoghurts in a fridge.
Work out the probability that both the yoghurts were the same flavour.
.....................................
(Total 4 marks)
1
The probability that the train will be late leaving Swindon is
5
7
If the train is late leaving Swindon, the probability that it will arrive late in London is
10
1
If the train is not late leaving Swindon, the probability that it will arrive late in London is
10
late
............
1 late
5 ............ not late
late
............
............ not late
(b) Work out the probability that Nicola will arrive late in London.
..........................
(3)
(Total 5 marks)
RED BLUE
BLUE BLUE
GREEN RED BLUE RED
A B
Work out the probability that spinner A and spinner B do not land on the same colour.
..........................
(Total 4 marks)
Work out the probability that they both take a bottle of the same type of juice.
....................................
(Total 4 marks)
(b) 3
1 5
, + labels
6 6
5
B1 for on the red dice, not six branch
6
B1 for a fully complete tree diagram with all branches labelled
1 5
B1 for , on all remaining branches as appropriate
6 6
[4]
1
(c) (i) 2
36
2
1
6
2
1 1 1
M1 or × only or 0.28
6 6 6
1
A1 or 0.03 or better
36
11
(ii) 3
36
2
5
1−
6
OR
1 5 5 1 1 1
× + × + ×
6 6 6 6 6 6
2
5 5 5
M2 for 1 − or 1 – ×
6 6 6
A1 cao
OR
1 5
M1 for × oe
6 6
1 5 5 1
M1 for 2 or 3 only of × , × , “a”
6 6 6 6
11
A1 for or 0.31 or better
36
[9]
1
06. on LH branch
4
2 1 2
& & on RH branches 2
3 3 3
B1
B1
[2]
1
07. (a) on LH branch
4
2 1 2
& & on RH branches 2
3 3 3
B1 cao
B1
7
(b) 3
12
3 2 1 1 6 1
× + × = +
4 3 4 3 12 12
3 2 1 1
M1 for × or × from their
4 3 4 3
tree diagram
M1 for sum of two products
7
A1 for oe
12
(c) 14 3
1 1
n = 21 × 4 or : oe
6 4
1 2
× 84 or 21 ×
6 3
1 3 1 2 1 1
M1 for either × = or × = from their tree
3 4 4 3 4 6
diagram
21
M1 for 21 × 4 (= 84) or ×2
3
A1 for 14 cao
SC: B2 for 63 seen in fraction or ratio
[8]
2 5 2 5
08. , , , 2
5 7 7 7
2
B1 for in the correct place
5
5 2 5
B1 for , , all in the correct place
7 7 7
[2]
2 5 2 5
09. (a) , , , 2
5 7 7 7
2
B1 for in the correct place
5
5 2 5
B1 for , , all in the correct places
7 7 7
3 5 2 2
(b) × + ×
5 7 5 7
19
3
35
3 5 2 2
M1 for ×' ' or ' ' ×' '
5 7 5 7
3 5 2 2
M1 (dep) for ×' ' + ' ' ×' '
5 7 5 7
A1 cao
[5]
1
10.
4
2 1 2
2
3 3 3
1
B1 for correct on tennis
4
2 1 2
B1 for , , correct on snooker
3 3 3
[2]
1
11. (a)
4
2 1 2
2
3 3 3
1
B1 for correct on tennis
4
2 1 2
B1 for , , correct on snooker
3 3 3
3 1
(b) ×
4 3
1
2
4
3 1
M1 for ×
4 3
1
A1 for oe
4
3 2 1 1
(c) × + ×
4 3 4 3
1 1
+
2 12
7
3
12
3 2 1 1
M1 for ×" " or " " ×" "
4 3 4 3
3 2 1 1
M1 ×" " + " " ×" "
4 3 4 3
7
A1 for oe (0.58…)
12
Or
3 1 1 2
M2 for 1 – × + ×
4 3 4 3
7
A1 for oe (0.58…)
12
[7]
5
16. (a)
8
5 3 5
, , 2
8 8 8
5
B1 for correct for 1st counter
8
5 3 5
B1 for , , correct for 2nd counter
8 8 8
3 3
(b) ×
8 8
9
oe 2
64
3 3
M1 for ×
8 8
9
A1 for oe
64
[4]
3
(b) oe 2
28
3 1
×
7 4
3 1
M1 for ×” “(0 < 2nd fraction < 1)
7 4
A1
[4]
21. 14 3
1 1
n = 21 × 4 or :
4 6
1 2
× 84 or 21 ×
6 3
1 3 1 2 1 1
M1 for × = or × =
3 4 4 3 4 6
21
M1 for 21 × 4 = 84 or ×2
3
A1 cao
[SC:B2 for answer of 63]
[3]
42
(b) 2
90
M1 for “1st girl” × “2nd girl”
A1 cao.
[4]
24. 4/7
5/11, 6/11, 5/11 2
B2 for all four probabilities correct
(B1for 1 probability correct)
[2]
3 2 2 1 4 3
25. × + × + ×
9 8 9 8 9 8
6 + 2 + 12
=
72
20
4
72
2 1 3
B1 for or or seen as 2nd probability
8 8 8
3 2 2 1 4 3
M1 for × or × or ×
9 8 9 8 9 8
3 2 2 1 4 3
M1 for × + × + ×
9 8 9 8 9 8
20
A1 for o.e.
72
Alternative scheme for replacement
3 2 4
B0 for or or seen as 2nd probability
9 9 9
3 3 2 2 4 4
M1 for × or × or ×
9 9 9 9 9 9
3 3 2 2 4 4
M1 for × + × + ×
9 9 9 9 9 9
29
A0 for
81
Special cases
29 20 29
S.C award B2 for or or
81 81 72
2 1 3 3 2 4
SC award B1 for and and or and and seen as
9 9 9 8 8 8
second probability if B2 not scored
Watch for candidates who misread the question and work with
10ths and 9ths They can score M2
Any other total for the number of yoghurts must be identified
before ft
[4]
5 7 5 1 3 2 3 1 2 2 2 7
27. × + × + × + × + × + ×
10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
35 + 5 + 6 + 3 + 4 + 14
=
100
OR
5 2 3 7 2 1
1 – × + × + ×
10 10 10 10 10 10
10 + 21 + 2 33
=1– = 1−
100 100
67
4
100
M1 for a tree diagram with at most 2 errors
5 7 5 1
or one of × or × etc
10 10 10 10
M1 for 5 out of 6 correct pairings of different colours
or 2 out of 3 correct pairings of same colours
or 8 out of 9 correct pairings of all colours
M1 (dep on M2) for adding 5 or 6 correct pairings of different
colours
or 1 – (2 or 3 correct pairings of same colours)
67
A1 for oe
100
x
SC All correctly done but 2nd spinner all
9
Award M1 for a “correct tree”
M1 for adding 5 or 6 “correct pairings” of different colours or
1 – (2 or 3 “correct pairings” of same colours)
M0 A0 (answer = 67/90)
[4]
4 3 3 2 2 1 12 + 6 + 2
28. × + × + × =
9 8 9 8 9 8 72
20
oe 4
72
3 2 1
B1 for or or seen as 2nd probability
8 8 8
4 3 3 2 2 1
M1 for × or × or ×
9 8 9 8 9 8
4 3 3 2 2 1
M1 for × + × + ×
9 8 9 8 9 8
20
A1 for oe
72
Alternative scheme for replacement
4 3 2
B0 for or or seen as 2nd probability
9 9 9
4 4 3 3 2 2
M1 for × or × or ×
9 9 9 9 9 9
4 4 3 3 2 2
M1 for × + × + ×
9 9 9 9 9 9
29
A0 for
81
Special cases
29 20 29
S.C. if M0 scored, award B2 for or or
81 81 72
3 2 1
S.C. if M0 scored award B1 for or or
9 9 9
3 2 4
or and and as second probability if B2 not scored
8 8 8
[4]
Mathematics B Paper 17
Candidates of all abilities managed to gain credit in part (a) for a reasonable explanation of the
problem. This was well answered. Candidates who failed to score usually offered a
contradictory explanation.
A completely correct tree diagram in part (b) was rare. Most attempts had one branch only from
each of the two given branches. 5/6 was often seen as the probability for the red dice not
showing a six, and this was often the only mark gained.
02. Part (a) required candidates to comment on a statement about a probability. Most thought that
the dice was unfair, maintaining that they would have expected 100 sixes. A few used the
phrase ‘about 100 sixes’. Some did say that the dice was fair, because it is possible to get 200
out of 600 sixes from a fair dice.
Part (b) required candidates to complete a probability tree diagram. Most did so by drawing two
more sets of two branches, correctly labelling and getting full marks. A few candidates thought
that they should just draw 2 out of 4 branches. A few candidates drew the 4 branches but the
probabilities on pairs of branches did not add up to 1.
Part (c) was a standard task and was well done by many candidates. The main error of good
candidates was in (ii) where they interpreted the task as finding exactly one six. However, there
were a sizeable number who thought that
1 × 1 = 2 when multiplying the fractions together.
03. This was truly a question of “two halves”. Part (a) was well answered. Nearly all candidates
correctly gave the 0.4 on the left hand branch, and the majority went on to gain the second
mark, but is was disappointing to find many errors on the right hand side, including careless
reversals of the 0.6 and 0.4, or an apparent desire to make all four probabilities sum to 1. In Part
(b) few gained any marks; there was little understanding of what the calculation of the mean
involves.
Mathematics B
Paper 17
All but a minority gained one mark in part (a), usually for a correct probability on the first
branch of the tree diagram.
In part (b) only very few were able to gain any marks, usually 3 or nothing.
Paper 19
Part (a) was well done although some candidates did write the product of two probabilities for
the second choice rather than the probability. The majority of candidates successfully answered
part (b). A common error here was to add rather than multiply the two probabilities. Part (c) was
very poorly done with the majority of candidates having no real idea how to tackle the question.
The common incorrect approach was to calculate the difference between the mean playing times
and subtract this from the mean playing time of all the CDs.
05. This was an unstructured probability question. In the first part candidates had to realise that they
had to use the probability of a ‘not win’ to get 0.55 × 0.45. This then has to be multiplied by 2
and evaluated. Some candidates drew a tree diagram and were able to add together 4 terms to
get the correct answer of 0.495.
In the second part, candidates had to realise that there were three possible cases to consider.
These were ‘win, lose’, ‘lose, win’ and ‘draw, draw’ over the two games. Many candidates were
able to identify at least one of these terms but the overall success rate was not high.
Weaker candidates assumed that all possible cases were equally likely.
06. Specification A
A well answered question. The only common error was to use quarters on the right hand
branches.
Specification B
¼ was often seen in the first pair of branches, gaining one mark, however there were many
confused attempts at completing the second pairs of branches, often still using quarters.
08. This question was usually well answered. Common misunderstandings included a reversal of
the 2/7 and 5/7 on the bottom two branches, or a failure to use 7 in the denominator.
09. Most candidates inserted the correct fractions into the probability tree diagram. Part (b) was also
19
well answered with the correct answer of often seen. Common occurring errors included a
35
correct method, but with the multiplication carried out wrongly by making the denominators of
the fractions the same, followed by incorrect multiplication. A few candidates thought that they
had to add the fractions. They scored no marks.
10. Specification A
The tree diagram was completed correctly by more than half of the candidates. It was not
surprising that most errors were made on the bottom two right hand branches.
Specification B
1
Most candidates scored at least one mark here, usually for correctly labelling the in the first
4
branch. Failure in the second branches often arose from including quarters in one or more of the
probabilities.
11. Specification A
The probability tree diagram was generally completed correctly. Part (b) was almost always
3 1 4
answered using a correct method although there were the occasional errors of × = .
4 3 12
Answers to part (c) were also good, but less successful than part (b). There were the usual errors
of confusing the use of multiplication and addition in the method as well as the accuracy errors
of the type outlined for part (b).
Specification B
The tree diagram in part (a) was completed correctly by over 90% of candidates. Parts (b) and
(c) were generally well answered although more candidates than usual attempted to add rather
than multiply the relevant probabilities. A few candidates indicated that they knew that the
relevant probabilities in (a) needed to be multiplied but then went on to add them regardless.
12. The majority of candidates were able to complete the tree diagram in part (a). In part (b), most
candidates knew that they were required to multiply 0.4 by 0.4 but a large proportion of these
had problems in doing this- typically giving their answer as 1.6 or 0.8. Relatively few added the
probabilities.
13. Part (a) of this question was done well by the majority of candidates, scoring at least one mark
for 0.6 on the first branch.
In parts (b) and (c), candidates often identified the correct probabilities, but a significant number
were confused about that operations they should be using. A popular error was to add the
probabilities along the branches instead of multiplying them. A surprising number of those
candidates who multiplied probabilities were unable to do this correctly, e.g. 0.3 × 0.4 was often
evaluated as 1.2. In part (c), many candidates worked with the correct two pairs of branches, but
many of these were confused about the order of the operations; a common incorrect method was
(0.6 + 0.7) × (0.6 + 0.3). A popular incorrect answer was 4.6
As the question was written in decimals most candidates kept the probabilities in this form, it
was noted, however, that those candidates who converted their decimals to fractions were often
more accurate with their answers than those that hadn’t.
14. Part (a) was well answered. Very few candidates thought that this was sampling without
replacement.
Answers to part (b) were split between the correct 0.2 × 0.2 and the incorrect 0.2 + 0.2, although
some candidates evaluated the former as 0.4
Answers to part (c) generally considered some of the 5 cases. Quite often the answer 0.2 was
seen from 0.58 × 0.2 + 0.22 × 0.2 + 0.2 × 0.2 or the answer 0.32 from (0.58 × 0.2 + 0.2) × 2
The approach 1 – P(No jazz) was rarely seen, but usually led to the correct answer.
15. Part (a) was done well by the vast majority of the candidates. In part (b), many candidates knew
that they needed to multiply the probabilities but a significant number of these were unable to
do the calculation accurately, e.g. 0.8 × 0.6 = 4.8 or 0.42. Common incorrect methods were 0.8
0.8 + 0.6
+ 0.6 = 1.4 and = 0.7 . In part (c), only the best candidates were able to score full
2
marks for this question, but many were able to score 1 mark for either 0.8 × 0.4 or 0.2 × 0.6.
Common errors here were similar to those in part (b), e.g. those involving poor arithmetic, e.g.
0.8 × 0.4 = 3.2, 0.24 or 2.4, or those involving confusion as to when to multiply the probabilities
or when to add the probabilities, e.g. (0.8 + 0.4) × (0.2 + 0.6).
16. Accurate completion of the probability tree diagram was good with most candidates scoring at
least one mark. In part (b) however a great many candidates added the probabilities instead of
3 3
multiplying. It is also of note that of the candidates who correctly quoted × a significant
8 8
9
number failed to correctly work out this product; being a common error.
16
17. Very few candidates failed to score any marks at all in this question.
Part (a) was answered very well with most candidates completing the probability tree diagram
correctly. Errors usually occurred on the right hand branches where some candidates put the
values 0.5, 0.3 and 0.2 in the wrong order and some inserted the results of multiplying two
probabilities together. A significant number of candidates were not aware that they needed to
multiply the probabilities on the relevant branches in part (b) and many added 0.5 to 0.5 instead.
Even when candidates did write down 0.5 × 0.5 this was sometimes evaluated incorrectly with
answers of 0.5, 1 and even 2.5 seen quite frequently. Some candidates with incorrect answers
lost the opportunity of gaining a method mark here because they did not show any working.
18. Part (a) was generally well done. However, a number failed to get the correct entries for Pat.
Part (b) could be done independently of the probability tree diagram. Many candidates wrote
down the correct expression of 0.2 × 0.6 and obtained the answer 0.12. However, a significant
number of candidates gave an answer of 1.2. The incorrect method of 0.2 + 0.6 was frequently
seen.
19. Part (a) was well answered. In part (b) the majority of candidates found one product correctly
but few were able to demonstrate a fully correct method often failing to appreciate the
mathematical meaning of ‘at least’. It is disappointing to report that many could not correctly
find the value of the individual products and some final answers were even greater than one.
20. Completion of the tree diagram was well done by the vast majority of candidates. In part (b) a
significant number of candidates added rather than multiplied the probabilities. The main
concern, however, was candidates’ failure to always evaluate the fraction product correctly. It is
worth noting that section B is a calculator section and so the product should not have been a
3 1 4 1
problem. A common error was × = = or, perhaps worse in a probability question,
7 4 28 7
3 1 12 7 84
× = × = =3
7 4 28 28 28
21. Over 60% of candidates used the probabilities on the tree diagram correctly and indicated that
they would multiply appropriate probabilities. Unfortunately, many arithmetic errors were then
seen; a significant number of candidates added rather than multiplied the probabilities. A
common error was to give the answer as 63 coming from subtracting the number of times both
games were won from the total number of games played.
22. Part (a) was answered correctly by the majority of candidates. Candidates generally had much
less success with part (b) which was poorly done. A significant number of candidates added the
probabilities and then averaged these. Another incorrect method was to find the two correct
products but then multiple these instead of adding them.
23. Candidates clearly understood the concept of a tree diagram and there were many fully correct
answers to this question. A significant minority of candidates however, did not recognise this as
a “non-replacement” situation and marked the same probabilities ( 103 , 107 ) on the second stage of
their diagram. Although these candidates were unable to gain any marks for at least two correct
probabilities in part (a), many used their probabilities correctly in part (b) to gain some credit in
that part of the question. In part (b) some candidates failed to identify the need to multiply two
probabilities and disappointingly, a significant number attempted to add the probabilities,
sometimes giving numbers greater than one as their answers. 13 was often seen following
19
7 + 6 . A number of candidates misread the question and gave the probability of at least one
10 9
girl. Candidates who worked out the correct answer ( 42 ) but failed to simplify their fraction
90
correctly were not penalised as the question was not testing this skill. This does however
confirm the need for candidates to show their method clearly in the space for working. The need
to show working was also highlighted by those candidates who knew they had to multiply, and
wrote this down, but had insufficient ability with fractions to complete this correctly and those
who could not correctly multiply 6 by 7.
24. This question was well understood but it was surprising to see so many candidates making
errors in labelling the probabilities for snooker. The Darts “Not win” was almost correctly
labelled by 96% of candidates but they often switched the probabilities for “win” and “not win”
for snooker.
25. This was a fairly standard, but non-trivial, probability question. Many successful candidates
drew correct probability tree diagrams and used them properly. 24% of candidates knew that
they had to multiply the probabilities together as they worked along a set of branches starting
with the root and were then able to add the resulting 3 fractions correctly to get the right answer.
However, there were a large number of errors due to inability to tackle the arithmetic of
fractions correctly. These were of the following general types:
3 2 5 2 1 3
• carelessness, exemplified by one of × = or × =
9 8 72 9 8 72
3 2 5
• confusion over multiplication, exemplified by all of × = ,
9 8 72
2 1 3 4 3 7
× = and × =
9 8 72 9 8 72
3 2 42 3 2 432
• confusion over multiplication as exemplified by × = or × =
9 8 72 9 8 72
6 2 12 20
• confusion over addition as exemplified by + + =
72 72 72 216
Many candidates made life harder for themselves by calculating the correct fractions for the
cases SS, PP and CC, cancelling them and then making an error on the addition of the three
fractions with different denominators.
Some candidates treated the problem as one of replacement and were rewarded as they had
essentially the correct method.
Some candidates thought the total of yoghurts was 8 rather than 9 and ended up with a fraction
over 56 and there were also some candidates who tried to eat 3 yoghurts.
2 2
Other candidates gave fractions such as prob. (2nd is S) = rather than .
9 8
Some candidates drew out the whole equally likely sample space for the case with replacement
29
and obtained the answer
81
There were, of course many candidates who tried to draw a probability tree but could not get its
structure correct (generally they did not have 3 branches from every node) and many others who
could not get as far as that. 45% of candidates scored no marks.
26. A considerable number of candidates were able to score full marks on this question.
Most candidates were able to score at least 1 mark in part (a). Common incorrect answers here
include reversing the positions of 1/10 and 9/10 on the bottom right hand branches of the tree
diagram, and giving both pairs of branches on the right hand side of the tree diagram as the
same fractions (usually 7/10 and 3/10).
In part (c), the many candidates were able to write down 1/5 × 7/10 for one of the ways that
Nicola could be late, but neglected to consider the other way (i.e. 4/5 × 1/10). Other common
1 7 4 1
errors were based on a confusion in the required processes, e.g. × + × ; or in a
5 10 5 10
7 1
misunderstanding of how to interpret a tree diagram, e.g. × . Examiners reported a general
10 10
weakness in the candidates’ ability to deal with fractions.
27. There were some excellent answers to this question in which a correctly drawn probability tree
was constructed carrying the correct probabilities on each branch. The six required probability
products were then identified leading to the final probability of 67/100. Over 20% of the
candidates got this question fully correct with a further 6% only making one slip. The
alternative methods being used in an attempt to arrive at the final answer did, however, seemed
to be less successful. An abundance of fractions in the subsequent working very often left the
student wondering how to combine them together into one single probability. There was some
evidence of non-replacement seen thus making the question much more difficult than it need
have been.
The fractions manipulation within the working is clearly an area of weakness as some found
difficulty in combining fractions together. For example 5/10 × 7/10 ended up as 35/20, 12/100,
and any other combination of the four numbers. Cancelling the fractions down before
multiplying 5/10 × 7/10 = ½ × 7/10 = 7/20 was fine but then presented a problem when they had
to add together fractions with different denominators. As a general rule it would be easier to
achieve the final result if the fractions are not cancelled down. 60% of the candidates failed to
score any marks on this question. Many had little idea what to do, though realising it involved
the fractions 1/10; 2/10; 7/10 etc, then writing down some simple combination of these
fractions, including multiplying 3 together, adding or taking away. Others had a separate tree
diagram for each spinner, showing one or two throws but were then not sure what to do with
their answers. Candidates using decimal notation also demonstrated correct tree diagrams but
many had difficulty multiplying e.g. 0.2 × 0.2 correctly (the usual answer being 0.4).
28. This was a fairly standard, but non-trivial, probability question. Many successful candidates
drew correct probability tree diagrams and used them properly. 21% of candidates knew that
they had to multiply the probabilities together as they worked along a set of branches starting
with the root and a further 36% of candidates knew they had to be to add the resulting 3
fractions to get the right answer. However, there were a large number of errors due to inability
to tackle the arithmetic of fractions correctly. These were of the following general types:
3 2 5 2 1 3
• carelessness, exemplified by one of × = or × =
9 8 72 9 8 72
4 3 7
• confusion over multiplication, exemplified by all of × = ,
9 8 72
3 2 5 2 1 3
× = and × =
9 8 72 9 8 72
3 2 42 3 2 432
• confusion over multiplication as exemplified by × = or × =
9 8 72 9 8 72
6 2 12 20
• confusion over addition as exemplified by + + =
72 72 72 216
Many candidates made life harder for themselves by calculating the correct fractions for the
cases OO, AA and TT, cancelling them and then making an error on the addition of the three
fractions with different denominators.
Some candidates treated the problem as one of replacement and were rewarded as they had
essentially the correct method.
Some candidates thought the total of bottles was 8 or 10 rather than 9 and ended up with a
fraction over 56 or 90 and there were also some candidates who tried to drink 3 bottles or
convert to decimals.
2 2
Other candidates gave fractions such as probability(2nd is O) = rather than .
9 8
Some candidates drew out the whole equally likely sample space for the case with replacement
29
and obtained the answer
81
There were, of course many candidates who tried to draw a probability tree but could not get its
structure correct (generally they did not have 3 branches from every node) and many others who
could not get as far as that.
It was pleasing however to see that fully correct solutions were given in 30% of cases though
44% of candidates scored no marks.