Candida BSI Candidaemia NE China Zhang 2019
Candida BSI Candidaemia NE China Zhang 2019
Candida BSI Candidaemia NE China Zhang 2019
cambridge.org/hyg
Candida albicans vs. non-albicans candidaemia
in adult patients in Northeast China
Wei Zhang, Xingpeng Song, Hao Wu and Rui Zheng
Original Paper
Cite this article: Zhang W, Song X, Wu H, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, No. 36 Sanhao Street, Heping
Zheng R (2019). Epidemiology, risk factors and District, Shenyang, Liaoning, 110004, China
outcomes of Candida albicans vs. non-albicans
candidaemia in adult patients in Northeast Abstract
China. Epidemiology and Infection 147, e277,
1–8. https://doi.org/10.1017/ This study aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics, risk factors and outcomes of adult
S0950268819001638 patients with candidaemia caused by C. albicans vs. non-albicans Candida spp. (NAC). All
adult hospitalised cases of candidaemia (2012–2017) at a tertiary hospital in Shenyang were
Received: 17 March 2019
Revised: 20 August 2019 included in the retrospective study, and a total of 180 episodes were analysed. C. parapsilosis
Accepted: 21 August 2019 was the most frequently isolated species (38.3%), followed by C. albicans (35.6%), C. glabrata
(13.9%), C. tropicalis (10%) and others (2.2%). As initial antifungal therapy, 75.0%, 3.9%, 5.6%
Key words: and 2.2% of patients received fluconazole, caspofungin, micafungin and voriconazole, respect-
Candida albicans; candidaemia; mortality;
non-albicans Candida; risk factor
ively. Multivariate analyses revealed that total parenteral nutrition was associated with an
increased risk of NAC bloodstream infections (BSI) (OR 2.535, 95% CI (1.066–6.026))
Author for correspondence: vs. C. albicans BSI. Additionally, the presence of a urinary catheter was associated with an
Rui Zheng, E-mail: [email protected] increased risk of C. albicans BSI (OR 2.295 (1.129–4.666)) vs. NAC BSI. Moreover, ICU
stay (OR 4.013 (1.476–10.906)), renal failure (OR 3.24 (1.084–9.683)), thrombocytopaenia
(OR 7.171 (2.152–23.892)) and C. albicans (OR 3.629 (1.352–9.743)) were independent risk
factors for candidaemia-related 30-day mortality, while recent cancer surgery was associated
with reduced mortality risk (OR 26.479 (2.550–274.918)). All these factors may provide useful
information to select initial empirical antifungal agents.
Introduction
Candida is an important causative organism of bloodstream infections (BSIs). Over the last
two decades, candidaemia has been reported as the fourth and seventh most common
healthcare-associated BSI in US and European studies, respectively [1, 2]. In a recent multi-
centre point-prevalence survey, Candida species emerged as the most common bloodstream
pathogen and accounted for up to 22% of healthcare-associated BSIs [3]. Additionally, candi-
daemia remains associated with high-mortality rates, prolonged hospital stays and increased
healthcare costs [1, 4–7]. Overall, mortality rates among patients range from 19.6% to 67%
worldwide [1, 6, 8–12] and the major risk factors for candidaemia include receipt of parenteral
nutrition, exposure to broad spectrum antibiotics, presence of central venous catheter (CVC),
prior surgery and ICU stay [13, 14]. Even though C. albicans overall accounts for the majority
of Candida spp. causing candidaemia, the proportion of non-albicans Candida (NAC) spp. is
rising and has even exceeded that of C. albicans in some recent studies from Europe, Asia and
America [8–10, 15–17].
In general, the most frequently isolated NAC spp. from candidaemia cases include C. glab-
rata, C. parapsilosis, C. tropicalis and C. krusei [5, 10, 16, 17]. Reduced in vitro susceptibility to
antifungal agents has been observed among several NAC spp., which may present a therapeutic
challenge. C. glabrata and C. krusei tend to be less susceptible to azole agents than other
Candida spp., while C. parapsilosis shows the highest minimum inhibitory concentrations
(MICs) to the echinocandins than other Candida spp. [18, 19]. Several retrospective studies
suggest that delayed initiation of antifungal therapy after the onset of candidaemia is asso-
© The Author(s) 2019. This is an Open Access ciated with increased mortality, which highlights the importance of early appropriate antifun-
article, distributed under the terms of the
gal therapy [20]. The local epidemiology and variable antifungal susceptibility profiles of
Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which different Candida spp. are critical for the selection of antifungal therapy prior to culture
permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and and susceptibility data being available.
reproduction in any medium, provided the However, risk factors related to NAC BSI, and the distribution and antifungal susceptibility
original work is properly cited. of Candida spp. from BSI differ geographically, whereas data on risk factors, antifungal sus-
ceptibility and outcomes in C. albicans and NAC BSIs remain scarce in Northeast China.
Therefore, this retrospective study was performed to compare clinical characteristics and out-
comes between C. albicans and NAC candidaemia, analyse prognostic factors and determine
risk factors related to C. albicans or NAC at a tertiary hospital in Shenyang.
2 Wei Zhang et al.
Table 1. Distribution of Candida species among patients according to prior surgery or history of solid tumours
Species Non-surgical patients (42) Surgical patients (138) P Non-solid tumours (100) Solid tumours (80) P
Table 2. Demographics and clinical characteristics of patients with C. albicans and non-albicans candidaemia
(49%) was more than twice as frequent as C. tropicalis (19%) negative association with C. tropicalis [35]. Therefore, we
or C. parapsilosis (18%), which may explain the different find- speculate that the possible reason for divergent views may
ings. Frequent usage of TPN has been linked with C. parapsi- be the variable proportion of Candida spp. in the local epi-
losis candidaemia compared with C. albicans, as well as a demiological setting.
Epidemiology and Infection 5
Table 3. Multivariate logistic regression analysis of factors associated with an increased risk of candidaemia due to NAC species vs. C. albicans
Current and former smokers 0.601 0.369 2.655 0.103 1.824 (0.885–3.756)
TPN 0.93 0.442 4.432 0.035 2.535 (1.066–6.026)
Presence of urinary catheter −0.831 0.362 5.263 0.022 0.436 (0.214–0.886)
Constant 0.205 0.426 0.232 0.63 1.227 (–)
B, coefficient; S.E., standard error; Wald test statistic; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; TPN, total parenteral nutrition.
Table 4. In vitro antifungal susceptibility of Candida species isolated from 180 candidaemia episodes
Smoking increases susceptibility to a wide range of bacterial multivariate analysis, current and former smoking was not inde-
and viral infections [36] as well as oral candidiasis in HIV infected pendently associated with the occurrence of NAC BSI, it was likely
adults [37]. Based on pooled data from contemporary cohort to be a predictive factor for NAC candidaemia as according to our
studies in the USA, the risk of death from infections in current data current and former smokers had an increased risk for NAC
smokers is more than twice that of individuals who have never BSI, but no significant relationship was found between smoking
smoked [38]. However, data on invasive candidiasis and candi- and death due to candidaemia. More epidemiological, clinical
daemia in adult smokers remain scarce. Here, we explored the and mechanistic approaches are needed to study further the
role of smoking in NAC and C. albicans BSI. Although, by impact of smoking in such patients.
6 Wei Zhang et al.
Table 5. Univariate analysis of factors associated with 30-day mortality of patients with candidaemia
C. albicans blood isolates showed significantly greater suscep- recommendations from the updated guideline for the manage-
tibility to fluconazole (89.1%) than NAC isolates (62.1%) (P < ment of candidiasis that transition to higher-dose fluconazole
0.001) by applying the species-specific new CBPs. In contrast to should be considered for patients with fluconazole-susceptible
the overall high-fluconazole susceptibility rate of C. parapsilosis C. glabrata isolates [14]. We identified only two patients with
(88.4%) and C. tropicalis (61.1%) recorded here, some studies C. krusei, one of which was resistant to voriconazole; each was
from other cities in China have reported relatively reduced flucon- effectively treated with micafungin and caspofungin, respectively.
azole susceptibility in their corresponding Candida spp. For Treatment of candidaemia is increasingly problematic owing
example, a survey from Nanjing reported that only 74.2% of to accumulated resistance of Candida isolates to antifungal agents,
C. albicans, 57.7% of C. parapsilosis, 9.1% of C. glabrata and especially fluconazole worldwide [24, 39]. Considering safety and
31.6% of C. tropicalis were susceptible to fluconazole [28]. efficacy aspects of treatment, echinocandins are now recom-
Based on the CBPs, all 25 isolates of C. glabrata in this study mended especially in the early treatment of candidaemia, by
exhibited SDD to fluconazole, which supports the both USA and European guidelines [14, 39]. In the current
Epidemiology and Infection 7
Table 6. Multivariate logistic regression analysis of risk factors associated with 30-day mortality of patients with candidaemia
study, fluconazole was the most frequently used antifungal agent C. krusei and C. albicans (20 ± 40%), the lowest being C. parapsi-
for primary therapy, followed by echinocandins and voriconazole, losis [40]. Accordingly, the predominance of C. parapsilosis in our
although amphotericin B exhibited excellent in vitro activity over- study may have partly contributed to the observed lower mortality
all against Candida spp. The plausible explanations for the preva- in patients with NAC.
lent use of fluconazole are the species distribution pattern of Apart from C. albicans, the other variables strongly associated
isolates, their high rates of susceptibility of C. albicans and C. with mortality were ICU stay, renal failure and thrombocyto-
parapsilosis to the agents, and its safety and tolerability compared paenia, which suggest that the more severely ill patients had a
with amphotericin B, as well as a significantly lower cost. Due to worse prognosis. Additionally, almost all clearance of candidae-
the lack of echinocandin susceptibility testing in the present study, mia in survivors who did not receive antifungal treatment
these agents were used as initial empirical therapy for critically ill occurred in surgical patients following the removal of an indwel-
patients or those considered likely to have a fluconazole-resistant ling CVC or drainage catheter. Our results indicated that recent
Candida spp. based on the recommendations of the USA and cancer surgery was associated with a higher probability of survival
European guidelines. [14, 39] but an explanation for this remains unclear. Cancer patients who
Several studies have reported discrepant results between out- were judged reasonably able to tolerate surgery, often lacked dis-
comes of candidaemia and C. albicans spp. in comparison with tant metastases and had less disease severity and fewer complica-
NAC spp. Differences in mortality were not statistically significant tions. Such host factors may therefore be contributory to a
in patient cohorts in the USA (58% vs. 57%) [34], Beijing (34.7% reduced mortality rate for recent cancer surgery, and may aid clin-
vs. 38.6%) [17] and Shanghai (37.3% vs. 27.9%) [29]. Here, we icians better to judge the prognosis of these patients with
found that C. albicans BSI was an independent risk factor asso- candidaemia.
ciated with the mortality rate compared with NAC BSI (OR Our study has several main limitations. Firstly, owing to its
3.629; CI 1.352–9.743; P = 0.011), which mirrors data from retrospective cohort design, factors such as the management of
Shandong and Nanjing in China [8, 30]. By contrast, in Greece, CVC, the use of appropriate antifungal treatments, immunosup-
Dimopoulos et al., [26] reported NAC candidaemia to be pressive, cancer and glucocorticoid therapy, and underlying
associated with higher mortality than C. albicans in non- chronic lung and heart disease, were not evaluated owing to
immunosuppressed, non-neutropenic patients after ICU ad- incomplete medical data acquisition. Secondly, in vitro echino-
mission (OR 6.7; 95% CI 1.2–37.7; P = 0.03), which could be candin susceptibility testing of Candida isolates was not per-
attributed to inappropriate or delayed therapy owing to the slower formed, and thirdly, the relatively small sample size may impact
growth of NAC isolates on primary culture; patients with NAC on the confidence intervals and analysis of risk factors. Lastly,
candidaemia may also have been more critically ill than those the study was limited to a single centre and thus, the results
with C. albicans. may not be applicable to other settings.
Mortality rates of candidaemia have been attributed to the In summary, over the last 6 years, NAC was predominant
relative virulence of different Candida spp., a failure of among Candida isolates from adult candidaemia at Shengjing
host-defence mechanisms, patient’s underlying diseases and com- Hospital in Shenyang. TPN was associated with an increased
plications, inappropriate or delayed treatment and other factors risk of developing NAC candidaemia compared with C. albicans
[5, 20, 40]. In animal models, C. parapsilosis and C. krusei exhibit and patients with a urinary catheter were clearly at an increased
less virulence than C. albicans, C. tropicalis and C. glabrata [40]. risk of BSI due to C. albicans. Four independent risk factors for
A meta review of dozens of studies concluded in terms of both candidaemia-related death were identified, namely, ICU stay,
overall and attributable mortality that C. tropicalis and C. glabrata thrombocytopaenia, the isolation of C. albicans as a significant
are associated with the highest mortality (40 ± 70%), followed by predictor of survival and recent cancer surgery.
8 Wei Zhang et al.
Acknowledgements. We are grateful to Dr Zhijie Zhang and Dr Di Wang at 20. Garey KW et al. (2006) Time to initiation of fluconazole therapy impacts
the Department of Clinical Laboratory, Shengjing Hospital, for their valuable mortality in patients with candidemia: a multi-institutional study. Clinical
advice on microbiological methods to us and to Dr Liqiang Zheng at the Infectious Diseases 43, 25–31.
Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Shengjing Hospital, for his critical 21. Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (2017) Performance Standards
assistance with statistical analysis. for Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Yeasts, 1st Edn. CLSI document
M60. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Available at
Financial support. This research did not receive any specific grant from https://clsi.org/standards/products/microbiology/documents/m60/ (Accessed
funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. 12 June 2019).
22. European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing.
Conflict of interest. The authors declare no financial or other competing
Antifungal Agents Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs, Version
interests. The authors alone are responsible for the content and the writing 9.0, valid from 2018-02-12. Available at http://www.eucast.org/clinical_-
of the paper. breakpoints/ (Accessed 12 June 2019).
23. Gonzalez GM, Elizondo M and Ayala J (2008) Trends in species distribu-
tion and susceptibility of bloodstream isolates of Candida collected in
References
Monterrey, Mexico, to seven antifungal agents: results of a 3-year (2004 to
1. Wisplinghoff H et al. (2004) Nosocomial bloodstream infections in US 2007) surveillance study. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 46, 2902–2905.
hospitals: analysis of 24,179 cases from a prospective nationwide surveil- 24. Pfaller MA et al. (2011) Geographic variations in species distribution and
lance study. Clinical Infectious Diseases 39, 309–317. echinocandin and azole antifungal resistance rates among Candida blood-
2. Marchetti O et al. (2004) Epidemiology of candidemia in Swiss tertiary stream infection isolates: report from the SENTRY Antimicrobial
care hospitals: secular trends, 1991–2000. Clinical Infectious Diseases 38, Surveillance Program (2008 to 2009). Journal of Clinical Microbiology
311–320. 49, 396–399.
3. Magill SS et al. (2014) Multistate point-prevalence survey of health 25. Wu Z et al. (2014) Candidemia: incidence rates, type of species, and risk
care-associated infections. New England Journal of Medicine 370, 1198– factors at a tertiary care academic hospital in China. International Journal
1208. of Infectious Diseases 22, 4–8.
4. Zaoutis TE et al. (2005) The epidemiology and attributable outcomes of 26. Dimopoulos G et al. (2008) Candida albicans versus non-albicans inten-
candidemia in adults and children hospitalized in the United States: a pro- sive care unit-acquired bloodstream infections: differences in risk factors
pensity analysis. Clinical Infectious Diseases 41, 1232–1239. and outcome. Anesthesia & Analgesia 106, 523–529.
5. Puig-Asensio M et al. (2014) Epidemiology and predictive factors for early 27. Chi HW et al. (2011) Candida albicans versus non-albicans bloodstream
and late mortality in Candida bloodstream infections: a population-based infections: the comparison of risk factors and outcome. Journal of
surveillance in Spain. Clinical Microbiology and Infection 20, 245–254. Microbiology, Immunology and Infection 44, 369–375.
6. Chakrabarti A et al. (2015) Incidence, characteristics and outcome of 28. Ma CF et al. (2013) Surveillance study of species distribution, antifungal
ICU-acquired candidemia in India. Intensive Care Medicine 41, 285–295. susceptibility and mortality of nosocomial candidemia in a tertiary care
7. Hassan I et al. (2009) Excess mortality, length of stay and cost attributable hospital in China. BMC Infectious Diseases 13, 337.
to candidaemia. Journal of Infection 59, 360–365. 29. Wu JQ et al. (2011) Epidemiology and risk factors for non-Candida albi-
8. Zhang XB et al. (2012) Retrospective analysis of epidemiology and prog- cans candidemia in non-neutropenic patients at a Chinese teaching hos-
nostic factors for candidemia at a hospital in China, 2000–2009. Japanese pital. Medical Mycology 49, 552–555.
Journal of Infectious Diseases 65, 510–515. 30. Wang H et al. (2014) Antibiotics exposure, risk factors, and outcomes
9. Yang ZT et al. (2014) Epidemiology, species distribution and outcome of with Candida albicans and non-Candida albicans candidemia. Results
nosocomial Candida spp. bloodstream infection in Shanghai. BMC from a multi-center study. Saudi Medical Journal 35, 153–158.
Infectious Diseases 14, 241. 31. Hii IM et al. (2015) Changing epidemiology of candidemia in a medical
10. Diekema D et al. (2012) The changing epidemiology of healthcare- center in middle Taiwan. Journal of Microbiology, Immunology and
associated candidemia over three decades. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infection 48, 306–315.
Infectious Disease 73, 45–48. 32. Al-Rawahi GN and Roscoe DL (2013) Ten-year review of candidemia in a
11. Gudlaugsson O et al. (2003) Attributable mortality of nosocomial candi- Canadian tertiary care centre: Predominance of non-albicans Candida
demia, revisited. Clinical Infectious Diseases 37, 1172–1177. species. Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical
12. Sbrana F et al. (2018) Independent risk factors for mortality in critically Microbiology 24, e65–e68.
ill patients with candidemia on Italian Internal Medicine Wards. Internal 33. Alp S et al. (2015) Epidemiology of candidaemia in a tertiary care univer-
and Emergency Medicine 13, 199–204. sity hospital: 10-year experience with 381 candidaemia episodes between
13. Das I et al. (2011) Epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and outcome of 2001 and 2010. Mycoses 58, 498–505.
candidemia: experience in a tertiary referral center in the UK. 34. Chow JK et al. (2008) Factors associated with candidemia caused by non-
International Journal of Infectious Diseases 15, e759–e763. albicans Candida species versus Candida albicans in the intensive care
14. Pappas PG et al. (2016) Clinical practice guideline for the management of unit. Clinical Infectious Diseases 46, 1206–1213.
candidiasis: 2016 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 35. Chen LY et al. (2013) Associated clinical characteristics of patients with
Clinical Infectious Diseases 62, e1–50. candidemia among different Candida species. Journal of Microbiology,
15. Barchiesi F et al. (2016) Epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and out- Immunology and Infection 46, 463–468.
come of candidemia in a tertiary referral center in Italy from 2010 to 36. Bagaitkar J, Demuth DR and Scott DA (2008) Tobacco use increases
2014. Infection 44, 205–213. susceptibility to bacterial infection. Tobacco Induced Diseases 4, 12.
16. Guinea J (2014) Global trends in the distribution of Candida species caus- 37. Chattopadhyay A and Patton LL (2013) Smoking as a risk factor for oral
ing candidemia. Clinical Microbiology and Infection 20(suppl. 6), 5–10. candidiasis in HIV-infected adults. Journal of Oral Pathology and
17. Ding X et al. (2015) Epidemiology and risk factors for nosocomial Medicine 42, 302–308.
Non-Candida albicans candidemia in adult patients at a tertiary care hos- 38. Carter BD et al. (2015) Smoking and mortality – beyond established
pital in North China. Medical Mycology 53, 684–690. causes. New England Journal of Medicine 372, 631–640.
18. Wang H, Xu YC and Hsueh PR (2016) Epidemiology of candidemia and 39. Cornely OA et al. (2012) ESCMID* guideline for the diagnosis and man-
antifungal susceptibility in invasive Candida species in the Asia-Pacific agement of Candida diseases 2012: non-neutropenic adult patients.
region. Future Microbiology 11, 1461–1477. Clinical Microbiology and Infection 18(suppl. 7), 19–37.
19. Bassetti M et al. (2013) Epidemiology, species distribution, antifungal 40. Krcmery V and Barnes AJ (2002) Non-albicans Candida spp. causing
susceptibility, and outcome of candidemia across five sites in Italy and fungaemia: pathogenicity and antifungal resistance. Journal of hospital
Spain. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 51, 4167–4172. infection 50, 243–260.