EE 204 Chapter 7 Magnetostatic Field Part 3
EE 204 Chapter 7 Magnetostatic Field Part 3
We recall that some electrostatic field problems were simplified by relating the electric
potential V to the electric field intensity E 1 E 5 2=V 2 . Similarly, we can define a potential
associated with magnetostatic field B. In fact, the magnetic potential could be scalar Vm or
vector A. To define Vm and A involves recalling two important identities (see Example 3.10
and Practice Exercise 3.10):
= 3 1 =V 2 5 0 (7.35a)
= # 1= 3 A2 5 0 (7.35b)
which must always hold for any scalar field V and vector field A.
Just as E 5 2=V , we define the magnetic scalar potential Vm (in amperes) as related
to H according to
H 5 2=Vm if J 5 0 (7.36)
The condition attached to this equation is important and will be explained. Combining
eq. (7.36) and eq. (7.19) gives
J 5 = 3 H 5 = 3 1 2=Vm 2 5 0 (7.37)
since Vm must satisfy the condition in eq. (7.35a). Thus the magnetic scalar potential Vm is
only defined in a region where J 5 0 as in eq. (7.36). We should also note that Vm satisfies
Laplace’s equation just as V does for electrostatic fields; hence,
=2Vm 5 0, 1J 5 02 (7.38)
B5=3A (7.39)
Just as we defined
dQ
V53 (7.40)
4peoR
we can define
moI dl
A53 for line current (7.41)
L 4pR
moK dS
A53 for surface current (7.42)
S 4pR
moJ dv
A53 for volume current (7.43)
v 4pR
Rather than obtaining eqs. (7.41) to (7.43) from eq. (7.40), an alternative approach
would be to obtain eqs. (7.41) to (7.43) from eqs. (7.6) to (7.8). For example, we can derive
eq. (7.41) from eq. (7.6) in conjunction with eq. (7.39). To do this, we write eq. (7.6) as
mo I dlr 3 R
B5 (7.44)
4p 3L R3
where R is the distance vector from the line element dl at the source point 1 xr, yr, zr 2 to
the field point 1 x, y, z 2 as shown in Figure 7.19 and R 5 0 R 0 , that is,
R 5 0 r 2 r9 0 5 3 1 x 2 xr 2 2 1 1 y 2 yr 2 2 1 1 z 2 zr 2 2 4 1/2 (7.45)
Hence,
1 1 x 2 xr 2 ax 1 1 y 2 yr 2 ay 1 1 z 2 zr 2 az R
=a b 5 2 2 2 2 3/2
52 3
R 3 1 x 2 xr 2 1 1 y 2 yr 2 1 1 z 2 zr 2 4 R
or
R 1 aR
3 5 2=a b a5 b (7.46)
R R R2
where the differentiation is with respect to x, y, and z. Substituting this into eq. (7.44), we
obtain
mo 1
B52 3 I dlr 3 =a b (7.47)
4p L R
= 3 1 f F 2 5 f = 3 F 1 1 =f 2 3 F (7.48)
where f is a scalar field and F is a vector field. Taking f 5 1/R and F 5 dlr, we have
1 1 dlr
dlr 3 =a b 5 = 3 dlr 2 = 3 a b
R R R
1 dlr
dlr 3 =a b 5 2= 3 (7.49)
R R
moI dlr
B5=33 (7.50)
L 4pR
moI dlr
A53
L 4pR
! 5 3 B # dS 5 3 1 = 3 A 2 # dS 5 C A # dl
S S L
or
! 5 C A # dl (7.51)
L
Thus the magnetic flux through a given area can be found by using either eq. (7.32)
or (7.51). Also, the magnetic field can be determined by using either Vm or A; the
choice is dictated by the nature of the given problem except that Vm can be used only
in a source-free region. The use of the magnetic vector potential provides a powerful,
elegant approach to solving EM problems, particularly those relating to antennas. As we
shall notice in Chapter 13, it is more convenient to find B by first finding A in antenna
problems.
EXAMPLE 7.7 Given the magnetic vector potential A 5 2r2 /4 az Wb/m, calculate the total magnetic flux
crossing the surface f 5 p/2, 1 # r # 2 m, 0 # z # 5 m.
Solution:
We can solve this problem in two different ways: using eq. (7.32) or eq. (7.51).
Method 1:
'Az r
B5=3A52 af 5 af, dS 5 dr dz af
'r 2
Hence,
! 5 3 B # dS 5 3 3 r dr dz 5 r2 ` 1 5 2 5
5 2 1
1 1 15
S 2 z50 r51 4 2 4
! 5 3.75 Wb
Method 2:
We use
! 5 C A # dl 5 !1 1 !2 1 !3 1 !4
L
where L is the path bounding surface S; Ψ1, Ψ2, Ψ3, and Ψ4 are, respectively, the evalua-
tions of eLA # dl along the segments of L labeled 1 to 4 in Figure 7.20. Since A has only a
z-component,
!1 5 0 5 !3
That is,
! 5 !2 1 !4 5 2 c 1 1 2 2 3 dz 1 1 2 2 2 3 dzd
5 0
1
4 0 5
1 15
5 2 11 2 42 152 5
4 4
5 3.75 Wb
as obtained by Method 1. Note that the direction of the path L must agree with that of dS.
(a) B at 1 21, 2, 5 2
(b) The flux through the surface defined by z 5 1, 0 # x # 1, 21 # y # 4
This was obtained in Section 7.4 by using Ampère’s law. Obtain this by using the concept
of vector magnetic potential.
Solution:
Consider the current sheet as in Figure 7.21. From eq. (7.42),
moK dS
dA 5
4pR
R 5 0 R 0 5 0 1 0, 0, z 2 2 1 xr, yr, 0 2 0
(7.8.1)
5 3 1 xr 2 2 1 1 yr 2 2 1 z2 4 1/2
where the primed coordinates are for the source point while the unprimed coordinates
are for the field point. It is necessary (and customary) to distinguish between the two
points to avoid confusion (see Figure 7.19). Hence
In the integrand, we may change coordinates from Cartesian to cylindrical for convenience
so that
moKyzax ` 2p
rr dfr drr
B5 3 3
4p rr50 fr50 3 1 rr 2 2 1 z2 4 3/2
moKyzax `
5 2p 3 3 1 rr 2 2 1 z2 4 23/2 1/2 d 3 1 rr 2 2 4
4p 0
moKyzax 21 `
5 `
2 3 1 rr 2 2 1 z2 4 1/2 rr50
moKyax
5
2
Hence
B Ky
H5 5 a, for z . 0
mo 2 x
By simply replacing z by 2z in eq. (7.8.2) and following the same procedure, we obtain
Ky
H52 ax, for z , 0
2
†
7.8 DERIVATION OF BIOT–SAVART’S LAW AND AMPÈRE’S LAW
Both Biot–Savart’s law and Ampère’s law may be derived by using the concept of magnetic
vector potential. The derivation will involve the use of the vector identities in eq. (7.48) and
= 3 = 3 A 5 = 1 = # A 2 2 =2A (7.52)
Since Biot–Savart’s law as given in eq. (7.4) is defined in terms of line current, we begin our
derivation with eqs. (7.39) and (7.41); that is,
where R is as defined in eq. (7.45). If the vector identity in eq. (7.48) is applied by letting
F 5 dlr and f 5 1/R, eq. (7.53) becomes
moI 1 1
B5 C c = 3 dlr 1 a= b 3 dlr d (7.54)
4p L R R
where aR is a unit vector from the source point to the field point. Thus eq. (7.54) (upon
dropping the prime in d l ) becomes
moI dl 3 aR
B5 (7.57)
4p CL R2
which is Biot–Savart’s law.
= 3 B 5 = 1 = # A 2 2 =2A (7.58)
=#A50 (7.59)
which is called Coulomb’s gauge. Upon replacing B with moH and using eq. (7.19),
eq. (7.58) becomes
=2A 5 2mo= 3 H
or
which is called the vector Poisson equation. It is similar to Poisson’s equation 1 =2V 5 2rv /e 2
in electrostatics. In Cartesian coordinates, eq. (7.60) may be decomposed into three scalar
equations:
=2Ax 5 2moJx
=2Ay 5 2moJy (7.61)
=2Az 5 2moJz
# #
C H dl 5 3 = 3 H dS
L S
(7.62)
1
5 = 3 1 = 3 A 2 # dS
mo 3S
= 3 = 3 A 5 2=2 A 5 moJ
# #
C H dl 5 3 J dS 5 I
L S
†
7.9 APPLICATION NOTE—LIGHTNING
The approach of the negatively charged particles to the ground induces more positive
charges, especially on tall, sharp structures. A lightning bolt follows the path of least
resistance at the moment of initiation; this is rarely a straight line, and it is unique for
each strike. However, if we assume that lightning strokes arrive in the vertical direction,
we can estimate the striking distance as a function of the amplitude of the current of the
return stroke. The base striking distance D in meters, and the current I, in kiloamperes,
are related as
A polywell is a polyhedral group of metal rings; inside each ring is a coil, which produces
a magnetic field. As schematically illustrated in Figure 7.23, the position of each of the
rings and the direction of current flow in each coil are set to create a null magnetic field at
the center of the cube. On two opposing sides of the cube a stream of electrons is injected
through the rings. These injected electrons are pushed by the magnetic field toward the
(magnetically null) center of the cube, forming a cloud of electrons. When this cloud of
electrons is large enough, it will create what is known as an electrostatic potential well.
The polywell’s name comes from its polyhedral shape and the electrostatic potential well
produces.
In a nuclear fusion reactor two lighter atomic particles fuse together to form a heavier
particle, releasing large amounts of energy. The normal activity inside a nuclear fusion
reactor is as follows: Two spherically concentric, gridded electrodes create a radial electric
field that acts as an electrostatic potential well. Then the radial electric field accelerates ions
to fusion-revelant energies and confines them in the central grid region.
The fusion reactor system, however, suffers from substantial energy loss due to colli-
sions between the grid itself and the ions. The polywell overcomes this problem by replac-
ing the physical cathode with a virtual cathode, the electron cloud. In the polywell the ion
streams are injected into the polyhedron through the remaining four rings. These ions are
attracted to the electron cloud and are accelerated to the energy at which fusion can occur.
All these parts—the polywell and the electron and ion guns—are encapsulated in a
collection sphere, with all of this inside a vacuum chamber. This collection sphere captures
the energy released from the fusion process in the form of alpha particles, which come
from the fusion, inside the electron cloud, of boron and hydrogen ions. The use of boron
and hydrogen in nuclear fusion is becoming more popular than the use of deuterium
and tritium as fuel. Unlike the fusion of deuterium and tritium, the fusion of boron and
hydrogen produces little to no radiation and, since the only by-product is helium, there is
no radioactive waste.
MATLAB 7.1 y
y = x2
P(–0.5, 0.5, 0)
I
Suppose a 0.5 mA segment of current travels along the parabola y 5 x2 between a 5 1 0, 0, 0 2 and
b 5 1 1, 1, 0 2 cm. Using the Biot–Savart law, determine the magnetic field at point P(–0.5, 0.5, 0) due
to the segment.
We will find the general solution and evaluate at the observation point. We use the Biot–Savart law
to obtain the magnetic field at point P:
Idl 3 aR
H53 2
L 4pR
The unit vector from the incremental current filament at 1 xr, yr, 0 2 to the observation point P
(x, y, z) is
1 x 2 xr 2 ax 1 1 y 2 yr 2 ay 1 zaz
aR 5
R
R 5 " 1 x 2 xr 2 2 1 1 y 2 yr 2 2 1 z2
Thus
b 3 1 y 2 yr 2 dxr 2 1 x 2 xr 2 dyr 4 a 2 z dxra 1 z dyra
IdL 3 aR I z y x
H53 2 5 3 2 2 2 1.5
L 4pR 4p a 3 1 x 2 xr 1 y 2 yr 1 z
2 1 2 4
This integral is numerically evaluated as 0.85I; thus the magnetic field at P is given by:
mA
H 5 1.9437az
m
clear
I=0.5e-3; % the current value
% prompt for observation point
% in space
"
end
MATLAB 7.2
%
%
clear
% prompt user for input materials
end
end
figure
SUMMARY
1. The basic laws (Biot–Savart’s and Ampère’s) that govern magnetostatic fields are discussed.
Biot–Savart’s law, which is similar to Coulomb’s law, states that the magnetic field intensity
dH at r due to current element I dl at r is
I dl 3 R
dH 5 (in A/m)
4pR3
I dl ; K dS ; J dv
2. Ampère’s circuit law, which is similar to Gauss’s law, states that the circulation of H
around a closed path is equal to the current enclosed by the path; that is,
# #
C H dl 5 Ienc 5 3 J dS
L S