The document provides guidelines for writing a literature review paper, including sections for the title, authors, affiliations, abstract, keywords, introduction, body, conclusion, and references. The body should analyze and compare previous research on the topic, and identify gaps the current research will address.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
255 views3 pages
Review Paper Format
The document provides guidelines for writing a literature review paper, including sections for the title, authors, affiliations, abstract, keywords, introduction, body, conclusion, and references. The body should analyze and compare previous research on the topic, and identify gaps the current research will address.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3
1 Article title
2 Name a relevent name for your article.
3 4 Authors 5 Name of the author 6 7 Affiliations 8 Please include the full address of each author’s institution 9 10 11 Abstract 12 An abstract should be of approximately 200-300 words. Provide a summary of the 13 review question being addressed or rationale for the review, the major studies 14 reviewed, and conclusions drawn. Please do not cite references in the Abstract. 15 16 Keywords 17 List a minimum of three keywords, separated by semi colons. 18 19 20 1. Introduction 21 Introduce the topic and your rationale for addressing this topic focusing on why 22 this topic is important. Clearly define exactly what this article will discuss, outline the 23 order in which you will discuss each subtopic to give the reader any background 24 information needed to understand the coming sections. 25 26 2. Body (subtopics being addressed) 27 Although the structure may vary based on the sub-topics or review questions 28 being addressed. 29 A good strategy is to break the literature into ISSUES or THEMES or TOPICS 30 instead of going in chronological order by date of publication or in some other order. 31 These themes or topics can be organized in several ways: 1) around the various 32 positions taken by researchers; 2) around the various methods/findings of previous 33 research; For example, if you are reviewing three different methodologies, you might 34 divide the body of the article into three sections, each discussing one of the methods; 35 3) around various implications of previous research, etc. 36 IMPORTANT: The issues/themes should be organized in such a way that readers 37 can discern a storyline. In other words, you should create connections between each 38 topic and build your research focus. Build on conclusions from previous research that 39 lead to the problem/issue you are focusing on and the position you will take. Also 40 demonstrate places where there are gaps in previous research because of incomplete 41 methodology or flawed assumptions. 42 In these sections, be sure to describe the research methods and evaluate how 43 studies were conducted focusing on the study design and analysis. 44 2.1. Tips 45 (a) Focus: cite only literature related to your specific research focus. 46 (b) Compare/contrast the various arguments, theories, methodologies, and findings 47 expressed in the literature. Here are questions your analysis should address: 48 What do the authors agree on? 49 Which articles apply similar approaches to analyzing the research problem that 50 you will take? 51 What do experts in the field seem to disagree on or approach differently? 52 What are the debates or controversies in the field? 53 (c) Identify the gaps, problems or unresolved issues in the existing 54 knowledge/research that your research can fill. Here are the questions you will 55 consider: 56 What has the previous research NOT done that your study will do? 57 How does your research depart from what has been done before? 58 What makes your work distinctive? 59 Some example sentences might be as follows: 60 • “The previous research has mistakenly assumed that….” or “Although most experts 61 in the field believe …., they have overlooked …” 62 • “None of the previous research has examined ……” 63 • “Despite prior observations of ……, it remains unclear why/how…….” 64 (d) Connect or build upon the existing knowledge/research to your own area of 65 research and investigation. Here are the questions you should consider when 66 connecting your work to previous work: 67 What does your research draw upon from previous research? 68 How does your own work draw upon or synthesize what has been said in the 69 literature? 70 Some example sentences might be as follows: 71 • “Consequently, these factors need to be examined in more detail....” 72 • “Evidence suggests an interesting correlation between A & B; therefore, it is 73 desirable to survey different respondents....” 74 75 76 3. Conclusion 77 You should develop the conclusion by briefly restating the rationale for your 78 review and the purpose of the article, then discussing the conclusions you have 79 drawn. You should also discuss the implications of your review findings and where 80 you think research in this field should go from here. 81 82 References 83 References must be numbered in order of appearance in the text (including 84 citations in tables and legends) and listed individually at the end of the manuscript. 85 In the text, reference numbers should be placed in square brackets [ ] and placed 86 before the punctuation; for example [1], [1–3] or [1,3]. Maintain 10 as the size of the 87 font. 88 1. Author 1, A.B.; Author 2, C.D. Title of the article. Abbreviated Journal Name Year, Volume, page 89 range. 90 2. Author 1, A.; Author 2, B. Title of the chapter. In Book Title, 2nd ed.; Editor 1, A., Editor 2, B., 91 Eds.; Publisher: Publisher Location, Country, 2007; Volume 3, pp. 154 -196. 92 3. Author 1, A.; Author 2, B. Book Title, 3rd ed.; Publisher: Publisher Location, Country, 2008; pp. 93 154–196. 94 4. Author 1, A.B.; Author 2, C. Title of Unpublished Work. Abbreviated Journal Name year, phrase 95 indicating stage of publication (submitted; accepted; in press). 96 5. Author 1, A.B. (University, City, State, Country); Author 2, C. (Institute, City, State, Country). 97 Personal communication, 2012. 98 6. Author 1, A.B.; Author 2, C.D.; Author 3, E.F. Title of Presentation. In Proceedings of the Name 99 of the Conference, Location of Conference, Country, Date of Conference (Day Month Year). 100 7. Author 1, A.B. Title of Thesis. Level of Thesis, Degree-Granting University, Location of 101 University, Date of Completion. 102 8. Title of Site. Available online: URL (accessed on Day Month Year). 103 104 105 106 107 This document is sourced from the following links. 108 1. Format for a review paper. Website: Format for a review paper (attach to F204).pdf 109 (einsteinmed.edu), Accessed on: 26 April 2024 110 2. Writing the Literature Review. Website: Writing-the-Literature-Review.pdf (ucla.edu). 111 Accessed on: 26 April 2024 112 3. Instructions for Authors. Website: Actuators | Instructions for Authors (mdpi.com). Accessed 113 on: 26 April 2024