Unto This Last 00 Rusk

HB 161
.R95
*.«. -x»~ -> **•***)#<•«>
HB 161
R95
< o
"oV
7* <%
v
c
Digitized by the Internet Archive
in 2010 with funding from
The Library of Congress
http://www.archive.org/details/untothislastOOrusk
A
tJOOD-BooiC
•
15 THE •
PRECIOUS
LIFE-BLOOD
OF A
MASTER
5P! RIT.
MlUt>n
The KINGS TREASURIES
OF LITERATURE
GENERAL EDITOR
Sir AT QU1LLER COUCH
EW YORK EPDUTTON AND COMPAN
UNTO THIS
LAST
BY
JOHN RUSKIN
Sole Agent for Scotland
THE GRANT EDUCATIONAL CO. LTD.
GLASGOW
/l /J rights reserved
CONTENTS
Editor's Introduction .... PAGE
Author's Preface .... 7
Unto This Last —

Essay I. The Roots of Honour . 19
Essay II. The Veins of Wealth 43
Essay III. Qui Judicatis Terram 61
Essay IV. Ad Valorem 84
Commentary —
Editor's Notes, with Questions and Exercises 129
Brief Sketch of the Author's Life 159
Index .......
Ruskin as an Economist 167
179
W <?Jtf^
,*b *
In editing Unto this Last for the use of students, the
aim has been to provide an introduction to the study
of Civics and Social Science from the economic point
of view. The need for the study of these subjects
for those who are the Citizens of the Future is
now fully appreciated, and the keen interest newly

awakened affords an opportunity for young students
to realise that certain unchanging principles underlie
the changes and development of a Christian State.
Ruskin's contribution to Tightness of thought and
approach may well be taken to heart now, some sixty
years after he framed it, by those who seek to recon-
struct our industrial system. Some of the reforms
he most desired are still wanting and still desirable;
even more so the spirit he indicated as motive power.
Some reforms have developed greatly and unex-
pectedly and are found to be no specifics notably —
that of extended State intervention and control.
But no finality has been reached, and a just via
media between the extravagant proposals of the
uninstructed and the balanced laissez-faire of the
academic will be found only if each citizen learns
7
8 UNTO THIS LAST
enough of the fundamental principles of citizenship,
and of past history and experiments to think and
act responsibly.
This has now a chance of being brought about
through the more liberal interpretation of " education
for all," and the official sanction and encouragement
given to what may be called the New Humanism.
In accordance with this idea, educators seek to
bring the literary masterpieces themselves with-
in reach of elementary students instead of, as
formerly, providing them with mutilated versions
or trivial paraphrases. A double purpose is served
when the thought is clothed in appropriate and
arresting expression, and many a young student may
be unconsciously inspired by the twofold appeal,
whom a dull enunciation leaves cold, or a sensa-
tional one misleads.
Hence the text of this book is intact; Ruskin's
preface of 1862 is preserved, and all his essential
footnotes. These appear as in any unedited work
and, in addition, there have been supplied a brief
biographical sketch of the Author's life, an estimate
of his position as an economist, and some notes,

questions and exercises for optional use. In this form
it is thought that the book may be helpful to students
reading alone, as well as to teachers desiring to in-

EDITOR'S INTRODUCTION 9
troduce the study of Civics into the upper and middle
forms of Secondary and Continuation Schools,
No references are made in the body of the book
to any of the additional matter, so that the reader's
interest and enjoyment shall not be distracted
from the subject. But when help or elucidation is
desired recourse may be had to the notes and sugges-
tions given in the Commentary.
Susan Cunnington.
Storrington,
September, 1920.
—
I. The four following essays were published eighteen

months ago in the Comhill Magazine, and were
reprobated in a violent manner, as far as I could
hear, by most of the readers they met with.
Not a whit the less, I believe them to be the best,
that is to say, the truest, rightest-worded, and most
serviceable things I have ever written; and the last
of them, having had especial pains spent on it, is
probably the best I shall ever write.
" This," the reader may reply, " it might be, yet
not therefore well written." Which, in no mock
humility, admitting, I yet rest satisfied with the work,
though with nothing else that I have done; and
purposing shortly to follow out the subjects opened
in these papers, as I may find leisure, I wish the
introductory statements to be within the reach of
any one who may care to refer to them. So I repub-
lish the essays as they appeared. One word only is
changed, correcting the estimate of a weight; and
no word is added.
2. Although, however, I find nothing to modify
in these papers, it is a matter of regret to me that
the most startling of all the statements in them,
that respecting the necessity of the organisation of
labour, with fixed wages, —
should have found its
ii
12 UNTO THIS LAST
way into the essay; it being quite one of the
first
least important, though by no means the least certain,

of the positions to be defended. The real gist of these
papers, their central meaning and aim, is to give,
as I believe for the first time in plain English, it —
has often been incidentally given in good Greek
by Plato and Xenophon, and good Latin by Cicero
—
and Horace, a logical definition of wealth: such
definition being absolutely needed for a basis of
economical science. The most reputed essay on that
subject which has appeared in modern times, after
opening with the statement that " writers on political
economy profess to teach, or to investigate, the nature
thesis
—" Every one has a up
of wealth," thus follows the
notion,
declaration of
sufficiently correct
its
for common purposes, of what is meant by wealth."

... " It is no part of the design of this treatise to
x
aim at metaphysical nicety of definition."
3. Metaphysical nicety, we
assuredly do not need;
but physical nicety, and logical accuracy, with respect
to a physical subject, we as assuredly do.
Suppose the subject of inquiry, instead of being
House-law (Oikonomia), had been Star-law (Astro-
nomia), and that, ignoring distinction between stars
fixed and wandering, as here between wealth radiant
and wealth reflective, the writer had begun thus:
" Every one has a notion, sufficiently correct for
common purposes, of what is meant by stars. Meta-
1
Principles of Political Economy. By J. S. Mill. Preliminary
remarks, p. 2.
AUTHOR'S PREFACE 13
physical nicety in the definition of a star is not the
—
object of this treatise "; the essay so opened might
yet have been far more true in its final statements,
and a thousandfold more serviceable to the navigator,
than any treatise on wealth, which founds its con-
clusions on the popular conception of wealth, can
ever become to the economist.
4. It was, therefore, the first object of these follow-

ing papers to give an accurate and stable definition
of wealth. Their second object was to show that the
acquisition of wealth was finally possible only under
certain moral conditions of society, of which quite
the first was a belief in the existence and even, for
practical purposes, in the attainability of honesty.
Without venturing to pronounce since on such—
a matter human judgment is by no means conclusive
— what is, or is not, the noblest of God's works, we
may yet admit so much of Pope's assertion as that
an honest man is among His best works presently
visible, and, as things stand, a somewhat rare one;
but not an incredible or miraculous work; still less
an abnormal one. Honesty is not a disturbing force,
which deranges the orbits of economy; but a con-
sistent and commanding force, by obedience to which
— —
and by no other obedience those orbits can
continue clear of chaos.
5. It is true, I have sometimes heard Pope con-
demned for the lowness, instead of the height, of his
—
standard: "Honesty is indeed a respectable virtue;
;
i4 UNTO THIS LAST

but higher may men attain Shall nothing
how much !
"
more be asked of us than that we be honest ?
For the present, good friends, nothing. It seems
that in our aspirations to be more than that, we have
to some extent lost sight of the propriety of being so
much as that. What else we may have lost faith in,
there shall be here no question; but assuredly we
have lost faith in common honesty, and in the working
power of it. And this faith, with the facts on which
it may quite our first business to recover
rest, it is
and keep not only believing, but even by experience
:
assuring ourselves, that there are yet in the world

men who can be restrained from fraud otherwise than
by the fear of losing employment 1 nay, that it is
even accurately in proportion to the number of such
men in any State, that the said State does or can
prolong its existence.
To these two points, then, the following essays
are mainly directed. The subject of the organisation
of labour is only casually touched upon; because,
if we once can get a sufficient quantity of honesty
in our captains, the organisation of labour is easy,

and will develop itself without quarrel or difficulty;
but if we cannot get honesty in our captains, the
organisation of labour is for evermore impossible.
6. The several conditions of its possibility I pur-
1 " The effectual discipline which is exercised over a work-

man is not that of his corporation, but of his customers. It
isthe fear of losing their employment which restrains his
frauds, and corrects his negligence." (Wealth of Nations,
Book I. chap, io.)
—
AUTHOR'S PREFACE 15
pose to examine at length in the sequel. Yet, lest
the reader should be alarmed by the hints thrown
out during the following investigation of first prin-
ciples, as if they were leading him into unexpectedly
dangerous ground, I will, for his better assurance,
state at once the worst of the political creed at which
I wish him to arrive.
6 First,
(1). —
that there should be training schools
for youth established, at Government cost, 1 and
under Government discipline, over the whole country;
that every child born in the country should, at the
parents' wish, be permitted (and, in certain cases,
be under penalty required) to pass through them;
and that, in these schools, the child should (with
other minor pieces of knowledge hereafter to be
considered) imperatively be taught, with the best
skill of teaching that the country could produce,
the following three things :
(a) the laws of health, and the exercises enjoined

by them;
(b) habits of gentleness and justice; and
(c) the calling by which he is to live.
1
It will probably be inquired by near-sighted persons, out
of what funds such schools could be supported. The expedient
modes of direct provision for them I will examine hereafter;
indirectly, they would be far more than self-supporting. The
economy in crime alone, (quite one of the most costly articles
of luxury in the modern European market), which such
schools would induce, would suffice to support them ten
times over. Their economy of labour would be pure gain,
and that too large to be presently calculable.
16 UNTO THIS LAST
6 (2). Secondly, —that, in connection with these
training schools, there should be established, also
entirely under Government regulation, manufactories
and workshops, for the production and sale of every
necessary of life, and for the exercise of every useful
art. And that, interfering no whit with private enter-
prise, nor setting any restraints or tax on private
trade, but leaving both to do their best, and beat the
—
Government if they could, there should, at these
Government manufactories and shops, be authorita-
tively good and exemplary work done, and pure and
true substance sold; so that a man could be sure,
if he chose to pay the Government price, that he got
for his money bread that was bread, ale that was ale,
and work that was work.
—
6 (3). Thirdly, that any man, or woman, or boy,
or girl, out of employment, should be at once received
at the nearest Government school, and set to such
work as it appeared, on trial, they were fit for, at a
fixed rate of wages determinable every year: —
that,
being found incapable of work through ignorance,
they should be taught, or being found incapable of
work through sickness, should be tended; but that
being found objecting to work, they should be set,
under compulsion of the strictest nature, to the
more painful and degrading forms of necessary toil,
especially to that in mines and other places of danger
(such danger being, however, diminished to the
utmost by careful regulation and discipline) and the
due wages of such work be retained— cost of com-
AUTHOR'S PREFACE 17
pulsion first —
abstracted to be at the workman's
command, so soon as he has come to sounder mind
respecting the laws of employment.
—
6 (4). Lastly, that for the old and destitute,
comfort and home should be which pro-
provided;
vision, when misfortune had been by the working
of such a system sifted from guilt, would be honour-
able instead of disgraceful to the receiver. For (I
repeat this passage out of my Political Economy of
Art, to which the reader is referred for farther detail)
" a labourer serves his country with his spade, just
as a man in the middle ranks of life serves it with
sword, pen, or lancet. If the service be less, and,
therefore, the wages during health less, then the
reward when health is broken may be less, but not
less honourable; and it ought to be quite as natural
and straightforward a matter for a labourer to take
his pension from his parish, because he has deserved
well of his parish, as for a man in higher rank to take
his pension from his country, because he has deserved
well of his country."
To which statement, I will only add, for conclusion,
respecting the discipline and pay of life and death,
that, for both high and low, Livy's last words touch-
ing Valerius Publicola, " de publico est elatus" 1 ought
not to be a dishonourable close of epitaph.
These things, then, I believe, and am about, as I
1" P. Valerius, omnium consensu princeps belli pacisque
artibus, anno post moritur gloria ingenti, copiis f amiliaribus
;
adeo exiguis, ut funeri sumtus deesset de publico est elatus.

:
—
Luxere matronae ut Brutum." Lib. II. c. xvi.
B
18 UNTO THIS LAST
find power, to explain and illustrate in their various
bearings; following out also what belongs to them
of collateral inquiry. Here I state them only in
brief, to prevent the reader casting about in alarm
for my ultimate meaning; yet requesting him, for
the present, to remember, that in a science dealing
with so subtle elements as those of human nature,
it is only possible to answer for the final truth of
principles, not for the direct success of plans: and

that in the best of these last, what can be immediately
accomplished is always questionable, and what can
be finally accomplished, inconceivable.
Denmark Hill,
10th May, 1862.
FRIEND, I DO THEE NO WRONG. DIDST NOT THOU AGREE
WITH ME FOR A PENNY? TAKE THAT THINE IS, AND GO THY
WAY. I WILL GIVE UNTO THIS LAST EVEN AS UNTO THEE."
" IF YE THINK GOOD, GIVE ME MY PRICE; AND IF NOT, FOR-
BEAR. SO THEY WEIGHED FOR MY PRICE THIRTY PIECES OF
SILVER."
ESSAY I
THE ROOTS OF HONOUR
i. Among the delusions which at different periods
have possessed themselves of the minds of large

masses of the human race, perhaps the most curious
—certainly the least creditable — is the modern soi-
disant science of political economy, based on the idea
that an advantageous code of social action may be
determined irrespectively of the influence of social
affection.
Of course, as in the instances of alchemy, astrology,
and other such popular creeds, political
witchcraft,
economy has a plausible idea at the root of it. " The
social affections," says the economist, " are accidental
and disturbing elements in human nature but avarice
;
and the desire of progress are constant elements. Let

us eliminate the inconstants, and, considering the
19
20 UNTO THIS LAST
human being merely as a covetous machine, examine
by what laws of labour, purchase, and sale, the
greatest accumulative result in wealth is attainable.
Those laws once determined, it will be for each
individual afterwards to introduce as much of the
disturbing affectionate element as he chooses, and to
determine for himself the result on the new conditions
supposed."
2. This would be a perfectly logical and successful
method of analysis, if the accidentals afterwards to be
introduced were of the same nature as the powers
first examined. Supposing a body in motion to be
influenced by constant and inconstant forces, it is
usually the simplest way of examining its course
to trace it first under the persistent conditions, and
afterwards introduce the causes of variation. But
the disturbing elements in the social problem are not
of the same nature as the constant ones; they alter
the essence of the creature under examination the
moment they are added; they operate, not mathe-
matically, but chemically, introducing conditions
which render all our previous knowledge unavailable.
We made learned experiments upon pure nitrogen,
and have convinced ourselves that it is a very manage-
able gas: but behold! the thing which we have
practically to deal with is its chloride; and this,
the moment we touch it on our established principles,
sends us and our apparatus through the ceiling.
3. Observe, I neither impugn nor doubt the con-,
elusions of the science, if its terms are accepted. I
THE ROOTS OF HONOUR 21
am simply uninterested in them, as I should be in
those of a science of gymnastics which assumed
that men had no skeletons. It might be shown, on
that supposition, that it would be advantageous to
roll the students up into pellets, flatten them into
cakes, or stretch them into cables; and that when
these results were effected, the re-insertion of the
skeleton would be attended with various inconveni-
ences to their constitution. The reasoning might
be admirable, the conclusions true, and the science
deficient only in applicability. Modern political eco-
nomy stands on a precisely similar basis. Assuming,
not that the human being has no skeleton, but that
it is all skeleton, it founds an ossifiant theory of
progress on this negation of a soul; and having shown

the utmost that may be made of bones, and con-
structed a number of interesting geometrical figures
with death's-heads and humeri, successfully proves
the inconvenience of the reappearance of a soul among
these corpuscular structures. I do not deny the
truth of this theory I simply deny its applicability
:
to the present phase of the world.

4. This inapplicability has been curiously mani-
fested during the embarrassment caused by the late
strikes of our workmen. Here occurs one of the
simplest cases, in a pertinent and positive form, of
the first vital problem which political economy has
to deal with (the relation between employer and
employed); and at a severe crisis, when lives in
multitudes, and wealth in masses, are at stake,
22 UNTO THIS LAST
the
mute
political economists are helpless —practically
; no demonstrable solution of the difficulty can
be given by them, such as may convince or calm the
opposing parties. Obstinately the masters take one
view of the matter; obstinately the operatives
another and no political science can set them at one.
;
5. It would be strange if it could, it being not by

" science " of any kind that men were ever intended
to be set at one. Disputant after disputant vainly
strives to show that the interests of the masters are,
or are not, antagonistic to those of the men: none
of the pleaders ever seeming to remember that it
does not absolutely or always follow that the persons
must be antagonistic because their interests are.
If there is only a crust of bread in the house, and
mother and children are starving, their interests are
not the same. If the mother eats it, the children
want it; if the children eat it, the mother must go
hungry to her work. Yet it does not necessarily
follow that there will be " antagonism " between
them, that they will fight for the crust, and that
the mother, being strongest, will get it, and eat it.
Neither, in any other case, whatever the relations of
the persons may be, can it be assumed for certain
that, because their interests are diverse, they must
necessarily regard each other with hostility, and use
violence or cunning to obtain the advantage.
6. Even if this were so, and it were as just as it is
convenient to consider men as actuated by no other

moral influences than those which affect rats or swine,
the logical conditions of the question are still indeter-
minable. It can never be shown generally either that
the interests of master and labourer are alike, or that
they are opposed; for, according to circumstances,
they may be either. It is, indeed, always the interest
of both that the work should be rightly done, and a
just price obtained for it; but, in the division of
profits, the gain of the one may or may not be the
loss of the other. It is not the master's interest to
pay wages so low as to leave the men sickly and
depressed, nor the workman's interest to be paid
high wages if the smallness of the master's profit
hinders him from enlarging his business, or conduct-
ing it in a safe and liberal way. A stoker ought not
to desire high pay if the company is too poor to keep
the engine-wheels in repair.
7. And the varieties of circumstance which influ-
ence these reciprocal interests are so endless, that all
endeavour to deduce rules of action from balance
of expediency is in vain. And it is meant to be
in vain. For no human actions ever were intended
by the Maker of men to be guided by balances of
expediency, but by balances of justice. He has there-
fore rendered all endeavours to determine expediency
futile for evermore. No man ever knew, or Can know,
what will be the ultimate result to himself, or to
others, of any given line of conduct. But every man
may know, and most of us do know, what is a just
and unjust act. And all of us may know also, that
the consequences of justice will be ultimately the
24 UNTO THIS LAST
best possible, both to others and ourselves, though
we can neither say what is best, nor how it is likely
to come to pass.
I have said balances of justice, meaning, in the
—
term justice, to include affection, such affection as
one man owes to another. All right relations between
master and operative, and all their best interests,
ultimately depend on these.
8. We shall find the best and simplest illustra-
tion of the relations of master and operative in the
position of domestic servants.
We willsuppose that the master of a household
desires only to get as much work out of his servants
as he can, at the rate of wages he gives. He never
allows them to be idle; feeds them as poorly and
lodges them as ill as they will endure, and in all things
pushes his requirements to the exact point beyond
which he cannot go without forcing the servant to
leave him. In doing this, there is no violation on his
part of what is commonly called " justice." He
agrees with the domestic for his whole time and
service, and takes them; —
the limits of hardship
in treatment being fixed by the practice of other
masters in his neighbourhood; that is to say, by
the current rate of wages for domestic labour. If
the servant can get a better place, he is free to take
one, and the master can only tell what is the real
market value of his labour, by requiring as much as
he will give.
This is the politico-economical view of the case,
according to the doctors of that science; who assert
that by this procedure the greatest average of work
will be obtained from the servant, and therefore,
the greatest benefit to the community, and through
the community, by reversion, to the servant himself.
That, however, is not so. It would be so if the
servant were an engine of which the motive power
was steam, magnetism, gravitation, or any other
agent of calculable force. But he being, on the con-
trary, an engine whose motive power is a Soul, the
force of this very peculiar agent, as an unknown
quantity, enters into all the political economist's
equations, without his knowledge, and falsifies every
one of their results. The largest quantity of work
will not be done by this curious engine for pay, or
under pressure, or by help of any kind of fuel which
may be supplied by the chaldron. It will be done
only when the motive force, that is to say, the will
or spirit of the creature, is brought to its greatest
strength by its own proper fuel; namely, by the
affections.
9. may indeed happen, and does happen often,
It
that the master is a man of sense and energy, a
if
large quantity of material work may be done under

mechanical pressure, enforced by strong will and
guided by wise method; also it may happen, and
does happen often, that if the master is indolent
and weak (however good-natured), a very small
quantity of work, and that bad, may be produced by
the servant's undirected strength, and contemptuous
26 UNTO THIS LAST
gratitude. But the universal law of the matter is
that, assuming any given quantity of energy and
sense in master and servant, the greatest material
result obtainable by them will be, not through
antagonism to each other, but through affection for
each other; and that if the master, instead of en-
deavouring to get as much work as possible from
the servant, seeks rather to rendet his appointed and
necessary work beneficial to him, and to forward
his interests in all just and wholesome ways, the real
amount of work ultimately done, or of good rendered,
by the person so cared for, will indeed be the greatest
possible.
Observe, I say, " of good rendered," for a servant's
work is not necessarily or always the best thing he
can give his master. But good of all kinds, whether

in material service, in protective watchfulness of
his master's interest and credit, or in joyful readiness
to seize unexpected and irregular occasions of help.
Nor is this one whit less generally true because
indulgence will be frequently abused, and kindness
met with ingratitude. For the servant who, gently
treated, is ungrateful, treated ungently, will be re-
vengeful and the man who is dishonest to a liberal
;
master will be injurious to an unjust one.

10. In any case, and with any person, this unselfish
treatment will produce the most effective return.
Observe, I am here considering the affections wholly
as a motive power not at all as things in themselves
;
desirable or noble, or in any other way abstractedly

;

good. I look at them simply as an anomalous force,
rendering every one of the ordinary political econo-
mist's calculations nugatory; while, even if he desired
to introduce this new element into his estimates,
he has no power of dealing with it for the affections
;
only become a true motive power when they ignore

every other motive and condition of political economy.
Treat the servant kindly, with the idea of turning
his gratitude to account, and you will get, as you
deserve, no gratitude, nor any value for your kindness
but treat him kindly without any economical pur-
pose, and all economical purposes will be answered;
in this, as in all other matters, whosoever will save
1
his life shall lose it, whoso loses it shall find it.
11. The next and simplest example of

clearest
relation between master and operative is that which
exists between the commander of a regiment and his
men.
Supposing the officer only desires to apply the
rules of discipline so as, with least trouble to himself,
to make
the regiment most effective, he will not be
able, b}f any
rules, or administration of rules, on this
selfish principle, to develop the full strength of his
subordinates. If a man of sense and firmness, he may,
as in the former instance, produce a better result
than would be obtained by the irregular kindness
1
The
difference between the two modes of treatment, and
between their effective material results, may be seen very
accurately by a comparison of the relations of Esther and
Charlie in Bleak House, with those of Miss Brass and the
Marchioness in Master Humphrey's Clock.
28 UNTO THIS LAST
of a weak officer; but let the sense and firmness
be the same in both cases, and assuredly the officer
who has the most direct personal relations with his
men, the most care for their interests, and the most
value for their lives, will develop their effective
strength, through their affection for his own person,
and trust in his character, to a degree wholly unat-
tainable by other means. This law applies still more
stringently as the numbers concerned are larger;
a charge may often be successful, though the men
dislike their officers; a battle has rarely been won,
unless they loved their general.
12. Passing from these simple examples to the
more complicated relations existing between a
manufacturer and his workmen, we are met first
by certain curious difficulties, resulting, apparently,
from a harder and colder state of moral elements.
It is easy to imagine an enthusiastic affection existing
among soldiers for the colonel. Not so easy to imagine
an enthusiastic affection among cotton-spinners for
the proprietor of the mill. A body of men associated
for purposes of robbery (as a Highland clan in ancient
times) shall be animated by perfect affection, and
every member of it be ready to lay down his life for
the life of his chief. But a band of men associated
for purposes of legal production and accumulation
is usually animated, it appears, by no such emotions,
and none of them are in any wise willing to give his

life for the life of his chief. Not only are we met by
this apparent anomaly, in moral matters, but by

others connected with it, in administration of system.
For a servant or a soldier is engaged at a definite
rate of wages, for a definite period; but a workman
at a rate of wages variable according to the demand
for labour, and with the risk of being at any time
thrown out of his situation by chances of trade.
Now, as, under these contingencies, no action of the
affections can take place, but only an explosive action
of âffections, two points offer themselves for
consideration in the matter.
—
The first How far the rate of wages may be so
regulated as not to vary with the demand for labour.
—
The second How far it is possible that bodies of
workmen may be engaged and maintained at such
fixed rate of wages (whatever the state of trade may
be), without enlarging or diminishing their number,
so as to give them permanent interest in the establish-
ment with which they are connected, like that of the
domestic servants in an old family, or an esprit de
corps, like that of the soldiers in a crack regiment.
13. The first question is, I say, how far it may be
possible to fix the rate of wages irrespectively of the
demand for labour.
Perhaps one of the most curious facts in the history
of human error is the denial by the common political
economist of the possibility of thus regulating wages ;
while, for all the important, and much of the unim-

portant, labour on the earth, wages are already so
regulated.
We do not sell our prime-ministership by Dutch
30 UNTO THIS LAST
auction; nor, on the decease of a bishop, whatever
may be the general advantages of simony, do we (yet)
offer his diocese to the clergyman who will take the
episcopacy at the lowest contract. We (with exquisite
sagacity of political economy!) do indeed sell com-
missions; but not openly, generalships: sick, we do
not inquire for a physician who takes less than a
guinea; litigious, we never think of reducing six-
and-eightpence to f our-and-sixpence caught in a
;
shower, we do not canvass the cabmen, to find one

who values his driving at less than sixpence a mile.
It is true that in all these cases there is, and in
every conceivable case there must be, ultimate
reference to the presumed difficulty of the work,
or number of candidates for the office. If it were
thought that the labour necessary to make a good
physician would be gone through by a sufficient
number of students with the prospect of only half-
guinea fees, public consent would soon withdraw the
unnecessary half-guinea. In this ultimate sense,
the price of labour is indeed always regulated by
the demand for it; but, so far as the practical and
immediate administration of the matter is regarded,
the best labour always has been, and is, as all labour
ought to be, paid by an invariable standard.
14. "What!" the reader, perhaps, answers
amazedly: " pay good and bad workmen alike? "
Certainly. The difference between one prelate's
sermons and his successor's, —or between one
physician's opinion and another's, — is far greater,
as respects the qualities ofmind involved, and far
more important you personally, than the
in result to
difference between good and bad laying of bricks
(though that is greater than most people suppose).
Yet you pay with equal fee, contentedly, the good
and bad workmen upon your soul, and the good and
bad workmen upon your body much more may you
;
pay, contentedly, with equal fees, the good and bad

workmen upon your house.
"Nay, but I choose my physician and (?) my
clergyman, thus indicating my sense of the quality
of their work." By all means, also, choose your
bricklayer; that is the proper reward of the good
workman, to be "chosen." The natural and right
system respecting all labour is, that it should be
paid at a fixed rate, but the good workman employed,
and the bad workman unemployed. The false, un-
natural, and destructive system is when the bad
workman is allowed to offer his work at half-price,
and either take the place of the good, or force him
by his competition to work for an inadequate sum.
15. This equality of wages, then, being the first
object towards which we have to discover the
directest available road; the second is, as above
stated, that of maintaining constant numbers of
workmen in employment, whatever may be the
accidental demand for the article they produce.
I believe the sudden and extensive inequalities
of demand which necessarily arise in the mercantile
operations of an active nation, constitute the only
32 UNTO THIS LAST
essential difficulty which has to be overcome in a
just organisation of labour. The subject opens into
too many branches to admit of being investigated
in a paper of this kind; but the following general
facts bearing on it may be noted.
The wages which enable any workman to live are
necessarily higher, if his work is liable to intermission,
than if it assured and continuous; and however

is
severe the struggle for work may become, the general

law will always hold, that men must get more daily
pay if, on the average, they can only calculate on
work three days a week, than they would require if
they were sure of work six days a week. Supposing
that a man cannot live on less than a shilling a day,
his seven shillings he mast get, either for three days'
violent work, or six days' deliberate work. The
tendency of all modern mercantile operations is to
throw both wages and trade into the form of a lottery,
and to make the workman's pay depend on inter-
mittent exertion, and the principal's profit on
dexterously used chance.
16. In what partial degree, I repeat, this may be
necessary, in consequence of the activities of modern
trade, I do not here investigate; contenting myself
with the fact, that in its fatallest aspects it is assuredly
unnecessary, and results merely from love of gambling
on the part of the masters, and from ignorance and
sensuality in the men. The masters cannot bear to
let any opportunity of gain escape them, and frantic-
ally rush at every gap and breach in the walls of
Fortune, raging to be rich, and affronting, with
impatient covetousness, every risk of ruin; while
the men prefer three days of violent labour, and
three days of drunkenness, to six days of moderate
work and wise rest. There is no way in which a
principal, who really desires to help his workmen,
may do it more effectually than by checking these
disorderly habits both in himself and them keeping
;
his own business operations on a scale which will

enable them to pursue them securely, not yielding
to temptations of precarious gain; and, at the same
time, leading his workmen into regular habits of
labour and life, either by inducing them rather to
take low wages in the form of a fixed salary, than high
wages, subject to the chance of their being thrown
out of work or, if this be impossible, by discouraging
;
the system of violent exertion for nominally high day

wages, and leading the men to take lower pay for
more regular labour.
In effecting any radical changes of this kind,
doubtless there would be great inconvenience and loss
incurred by all the originators of movement. That
which can be done with perfect convenience and
without loss, is not always the thing that most needs
to be done, or which we are most imperatively
required to do.
17. I have already alluded to the difference
hitherto existing between regiments of men associated
for purposes of violence, and for purposes of manu-
facture; in that the former appear capable of self-
c
;
34 UNTO THIS LAST

sacrifice —the latter, not; which singular fact is the
real reason of the general lowness of estimate in
which the profession of commerce is held, as com-
pared with that of arms. Philosophically, it does not,
at first sight, appear reasonable (many writers have
endeavoured to prove it unreasonable) that a peace-
able and rational person, whose trade is buying and
selling, should be held in less honour than an un-
peaceable and often irrational person, whose trade
isslaying. Nevertheless, the consent of mankind has
always, in spite of the philosophers, given precedence
to the soldier.
And this is right.
For the soldier's trade, verily and essentially/ is
not slaying,* but being slain. This, without well
knowing its own meaning, the world honours it for.
A bravo 's trade is slaying; but the world has never
respected bravos more than merchants: the reason
it honours the soldier is, because he holds his life
at the service of the State. Reckless he may be

— —
fond of pleasure or of adventure all kinds of
bye-motives and mean impulses may have deter-
mined the choice of his profession, and may affect
(to all appearance exclusively) his daily conduct in it
but our estimate of him is based on this ultimate
fact —of which we are well assured —
that, put him
in a fortress breach, with all the pleasures of the
world behind him, and only death and his duty in
front of him, he will keep his face to the front and ;
he knows that this choice may be put to him at any

moment, and has beforehand taken his part —virtually
—
takes such part continually does, in reality, die daily.
18. Not less is the respect we pay to the lawyer and
physician, founded ultimately on their self-sacrifice.
Whatever the learning or acuteness of a great lawyer,
our chief respect for him depends on our belief that,
set in a judge's seat, he will strive to judge justly,
come of it what may. Could we suppose that he
would take bribes, and use his acuteness and legal
knowledge to give plausibility to iniquitous decisions,
no degree of intellect would win for him our respect.
Nothing will win it, short of our tacit conviction,
that in all important acts of his life justice is first
with him; his own interest, second.
In the case of a physician, the ground of the
honour we render him is clearer still. Whatever his
science, we should shrink from him in horror if we
found him regard his patients merely as subjects to
experiment upon; much more, if we found that,
receiving bribes from persons interested in their
deaths, he was using his best skill to give poison in
the mask of medicine.
Finally, the principle holds with utmost clearness
as it respects clergymen. No
goodness of disposition
will excuse want of science in a physician or of
shrewdness in an advocate; but a clergyman, even
though his power of intellect be small, is respected
on the presumed ground of his unselfishness and
serviceableness.
19. Now there can be no question but that the
36 UNTO THIS LAST
tact, foresight, decision, and other mental powers,
required for the successful management of a large
mercantile concern, if not such as could be compared
with those of a great lawyer, general, or divine,
would at least match the general conditions of mind
required in the subordinate officers of a ship, or of
a regiment, or in the curate of a country parish.
If, therefore, all the efficient members of the so-called
liberal professions are still, somehow, in public
estimate of honour, preferred before the head of a
commercial firm, the reason must he deeper than in
the measurement of their several powers of mind.
And the essential reason for such preference will
be found to lie in the fact that the merchant is pre-
sumed to act always selfishly. His work may be very
necessary to the community; but the motive of it
is understood to be wholly personal. The merchant's
first object in all his dealings must be (the public

believe) to get as much for himself, and leave as
little to his neighbour (or customer) as possible.
Enforcing this upon him, by political statute, as the
necessary principle of his action; recommending it
to him on all occasions, and themselves recipro-
cally adopting it; proclaiming vociferously, for
law of the universe, that a buyer's function is
to cheapen, and a seller's to cheat, the public,—
nevertheless, involuntarily condemn the man of
commerce for his compliance with their own state-
ment, and stamp him for ever as belonging to an
inferior grade of human personality.
20. This they will find, eventually, they must give
up doing. They must not cease to condemn selfish-
ness; but they will have to discover a kind of com-
merce which is not exclusively selfish. Or, rather,
they will have to discover that there never was, or
can be, any other kind of commerce that this which
;
they have called commerce was not commerce at all,

but cozening; and that a true merchant differs as
much from a merchant according to laws of modern
political economy, as the hero of the Excursion from
Autolycus. They will find that commerce is an
occupation which gentlemen will every day see more
need to engage in, rather than in the businesses of
talking to men, or slaying them that, in true com-
:
merce, as in true preaching, or true fighting, it is

necessary to admit the idea of occasional voluntary
loss; —that sixpences have to be lost, as well as lives,
under a sense of duty; that the market may have its
martyrdoms as well as the pulpit; and trade its
heroisms, as well as war.
May have—in the final issue, must have and —
only has not had yet, because men of heroic temper
have always been misguided in their youth into
other fields, not recognising what is in our days,
perhaps, the most important of all fields; so that,
while many a zealous person loses his life in trying
to teach the form of a gospel, very few will lose a
hundred pounds in showing the practice of one.
21. The fact is, that people never have had clearly
explained to them the true functions of a merchant
— —
38 UNTO THIS LAST
with respect to other people. I should like the reader
to be very clear about this.
Five great intellectual professions, relating to
daily necessities of life, have hitherto existed
three exist necessarily, in every civilised nation:
The Soldier's profession is to defend it.
The Pastor's, to teach it. -
The Physician's, to keep it in health.

The Lawyer's, to enforce justice in it.
The Merchant's, to provide for it.
And the duty of all these men is, on due occasion,
to die for it.
" On due occasion," namely:
The Soldier, rather than leave his post in battle.
The Physician, rather than leave his post in plague.
The Pastor, rather than teach Falsehood.
The Lawyer, rather than countenance Injustice.
—
The Merchant What is his " due occasion " of
death?
22. It is the main question for the merchant, as for
all of us. For, truly, the man who does not know
when to die, does not know how to live.
Observe, merchant's function (or manu-
the
facturer's, for in the broad sense in which it is here
used the word must be understood to include both)
is to provide for the nation. It is no more his function
to get profit for himself out of that provision than

it is a clergyman's function to get his stipend. The
stipend is a due and necessary adjunct, but not the
object, of his life, if he be a true clergyman, any
more than his fee (or honorarium) is the object of
lifeto a true physician. Neither is his fee the object
of life to a true merchant. All three, if true men,
have a work to be done irrespective of fee to be —
done even at any cost, or for quite the contrary of
fee; the pastor's function being to teach, the physi-
cian's to heal, and the merchant's, as I have said,
to provide. That is to say, he has to understand to
their very root the qualities of the thing he deals in,
and the means of obtaining or producing it; and
he has to apply all his sagacity and energy to the
producing or obtaining it in perfect state, and dis-
tributing it at the cheapest possible price where it
is most needed.
And because the production or obtaining of any

commodity involves necessarily the agency of many
lives and hands, the merchant becomes in the course
of his business the master and governor of large
masses of men in a more direct, though less confessed
way, than a military officer or pastor; so that on him
falls, in great part, the responsibility for the kind of
life they lead: and it becomes his duty, not only to
be always considering how to produce what he sells

in the purest and cheapest forms, but how to make
the various employments involved in the produc-
tion, or transference of it, most beneficial to the
men employed.
23. And as into these two functions, requiring for
their right exercise the highest intelligence, as well
40 UNTO THIS LAST
as patience, kindness, and tact, the merchant is
bound to put all his energy, so for their just dis-
charge he bound, as soldier or physician is bound,
is
to give up, if need be, his life, in such a way as
it may be demanded of him. Two main points he

has in his providing function to maintain: first, his
engagements (faithfulness to engagements being the
real root of all possibilities in commerce); and,
secondly, the perfectness and purity of the thing
provided; so that, rather than fail in any engage-
ment, or consent to any deterioration, adulteration,
or unjust and exorbitant price of that which he
provides, he is bound to meet fearlessly any form
of distress, poverty, or labour, which may, through
maintenance of these points, come upon him.
24. Again: in his office as governor of the men
employed by him, the merchant or manufacturer is
invested with a distinctly paternal authority and
responsibility. In most cases, a youth entering a
commercial establishment is withdrawn altogether
from home influence; his master must become his
father, else he has, for practical and constant help,
no father at hand in all cases the master's authority,
:
together with the general tone and atmosphere of

his business, and the character of the men with whom
the youth is compelled in the course of it to associate,
have more immediate and pressing weight than the
home influence, and will usually neutralise it either
for good or evil; so that the only means which the
master has of doing justice to the men employed by
him is to ask himself sternly whether he is dealing
with such subordinate as he would with his own son,
if compelled by circumstances to take such a position.
Supposing the captain of a frigate saw it right, or

were by any chance obliged, to place his own son in
the position of a common sailor; as he would then
treat his son, he is bound always to treat every one
of the men under him. So, also, supposing the master
of a manufactory saw it right, or were by any chance
obliged, to place his own son in the position of an
ordinary workman; as he would then treat his son,
he is bound always to treat every one of his men.
This is the only effective, true, or practical Rule
which can be given on this point of political economy.
And as the captain of a ship is bound to be the
last man to leave his ship in case of wreck, and to
share his last crust with the sailors in case of famine,
so the manufacturer, in any commercial crisis or
distress, is bound to take the suffering of it with his
men, and even to take more of it for himself than he
allows his men to feel; as a father would in a famine,
shipwreck, or battle, sacrifice himself for his son.
25. All which sounds very strange: the only real
strangeness in the matter being, nevertheless, that
it should so sound. For all this is true, and that
not partially nor theoretically, but everlastingly
and practically all other doctrine than this respect-
:
ing matters political being false in premises, absurd

in deduction, and impossible in practice, consistently
with any progressive state of national life; all the
42 UNTO THIS LAST
lifewhich we now possess as a nation showing itself
in the resolute denial and scorn, by a few strong
minds and faithful hearts, of the economic principles
taught to our multitudes, which principles, so far
as accepted, lead straight to national destruction.
Respecting the modes and forms of destruction to
which they lead, and, on the other hand, respecting
the farther practical working of true polity, I hope
to reason further in a following paper.
—
ESSAY II
THE VEINS OF WEALTH
26. The answer which would be made by any

ordinary political economist to the statements con-
tained in the preceding paper, is in few words as
follows :
" It is indeed true that certain advantages of a

general nature may be obtained by the development
of social affections. But political economists never
professed, nor profess, to take advantages of a general
nature into consideration. Our science is simply the
science of getting rich. So far from being a fallacious
or visionary one, it is found by experience to be
practically effective. Persons who follow its precepts

do actually become rich, and persons who disobey
them become poor. Every capitalist of Europe has
acquired his fortune by following the known laws
of our science, and increases his capital daily by an
adherence to them. It is vain to bring forward tricks
of logic, against the force of accomplished facts.
Every man of business knows by experience how
money is made, and how it is lost."
Pardon me. Men of business do indeed know how

43
44 UNTO THIS LAST
they themselves made their money, or how, on
occasion, they lost it. Playing a long-practised game,
they are familiar with the chances of its cards, and
can rightly explain their losses and gains. But they
neither know who keeps the bank of the gambling-
house, nor what other games may be played with the
same cards, nor what other losses and gains, far away
among the dark streets, are essentially, though
invisibly, dependent on theirs in the lighted rooms.
They have learned a few, and only a few, of the laws
of mercantile economy; but not one of those of
political economy.
27. Primarily, which is very notable and curious,
I observe that men of business rarely know the mean-
ing of the word " rich." At least if they know, they
do not in their reasonings allow for the fact, that it
is a relative word, implying its opposite "poor" as
positively as the word "north" implies its opposite

" south." Men nearly always speak and write as if
riches were absolute, and it were possible, by following
certain scientific precepts, for everybody to be rich.
Whereas riches are a power like that of electricity,
acting only through inequalities or negations of
itself. The force of the guinea you have in your
pocket depends wholly on the default of a guinea in
your neighbour's pocket. If he did not want it, it
would be of no use to you; the degree of power it
possesses depends accurately upon the need or desire
—
he has for it, and the art of making yourself rich
in the ordinary mercantile economist's sense, is there-
;
THE VEINS OF WEALTH 45

fore equally and necessarily the art of keeping your
neighbour poor.
I would not contend in this matter (and rarely in
any matter), for the acceptance of terms. But I wish
the reader clearly and deeply to understand the
difference between the two economies, to which the
terms " Political " and " Mercantile " might not
unadvisably be attached.
28. Political economy (the economy of a state, or of
citizens) consists simply in the production, preserva-
tion, and distribution, at fittest time and place, of
useful or pleasurable things. The farmer who cuts
his hay at the right time the ship-wright who drives
;
his bolts well home in sound wood the builder who

;
lays good bricks in well-tempered mortar; the

housewife who takes care of her furniture in the
parlour, and guards against all waste in her kitchen
and the singer who rightly disciplines, and never
overstrains her voice: are all political economists
in the true and final sense adding continually to
;
the riches and well-being of the nation to which they

belong.
But mercantile economy, the economy of "merces"
or of "pay," signifies the accumulation, in the hands
of individuals, of legal or moral claim upon, or power
over, the labour of others every such claim implying
;
precisely as much poverty or debt on one side, as it

implies riches or right on the other.
It does not, therefore, necessarily involve an addi-
tion to the actual property, or well-being of the
46 UNTO THIS LAST
State in which it exists. But since this commercial
wealth, or power over labour, is nearly always con-
vertible at once into real property, while real pro-
perty is not always convertible at once into power
over labour, the idea of riches among active men
in civilised nations, generally refers to commercial
wealth; and in estimating their possessions, they
rather calculate the value of their horses and fields
by the number of guineas they could get for them,
than the value of their guineas by the number of
horses and fields they could buy with them.
29. There is, however, another reason for this
habit of mind; namely, that an accumulation of
real property is of little use to its owner, unless, to-
gether with it, he has commercial power over labour.
Thus, suppose any person to be put in possession
of a large estate of fruitful land, with rich beds of
gold in its gravel, countless herds of cattle in its
pastures; houses, and gardens, and store-houses full
of useful stores but suppose, after all, that he could
;
get no servants? In order that he may be able to

have servants, some one in his neighbourhood must
—
be poor, and in want of his gold or his corn. Assume
that no one is in want of either, and that no servants
are to be had. He must, therefore, bake his own bread,
make his own clothes, plough his own ground, and
shepherd his own flocks. His gold will be as useful
to him as any other yellow pebbles on his estate. His
stores must rot, for he cannot consume them. He
can eat no more than another man could eat, and
wear no more than another man could wear. He must
lead a life of severe and common labour to procure
even ordinary comforts he will be ultimately unable
;
*
to keep either houses in repair, or fields in cultivation
and forced to content himself with a poor man's
portion of cottage and garden, in the midst of a desert
of waste land, trampled by wild cattle, and encum-
bered by ruins of palaces, which he will hardly mock
at himself by calling " his own."
30. The most covetous of mankind would, with
small exultation, I presume, accept riches of this kind
on these terms. What is under the
really desired,
name of riches, is essentially, power over men; in
its simplest sense, the power of obtaining for our own
advantage the labour of servant, tradesman, and

artist; in wider sense, authority of directing large
masses of the nation to various ends (good, trivial
or hurtful, according to the mind of the rich person).
And this power of wealth of course is greater or less
in direct proportion to the poverty of the men over
whom it is. exercised, and in inverse proportion to
the number of persons who are as rich as ourselves,
and who are ready to give the same price for an
article of which the supply is limited. If the musician
is poor, he will sing for small pay, as long as there
is only one person who can pay him; but if there
be two or three, he will sing for the one who offers
him most. And thus the power of the riches of the
patron (always imperfect and doubtful, as we shall
see presently, even when most authoritative) depends
48 UNTO THIS LAST
first on the poverty of the artist, and then on the
limitation of the number of equally wealthy persons,
who also want seats at the concert. So that, as above
stated, the art of becoming "
rich," in the common
sense, not absolutely nor finally the art of accumu-
is
lating much money for ourselves, but also of contriv-

ing that our neighbours shall have less. In accurate
terms, it is " the art of establishing the maximum
inequality in our own favour."
31. Now the establishment of such inequality
cannot be shown in the abstract to be either advan-
tageous or disadvantageous to the body of the nation.
The rash and absurd assumption that such inequalities
are necessarily advantageous, lies at the root of most
of the popular fallacies on the subject of political
economy. For the eternal and inevitable law in this
matter is, that the beneficialness of the inequality
depends, first, on the methods by which it was
accomplished, and, secondly, on the purposes to
which it is applied. Inequalities of wealth, unjustly
established, have assuredly injured the nation in
which they exist during their establishment and, ;
unjustly directed, injure it yet more during their

existence. But inequalities of wealth, justly estab-
lished, benefit the nation in the course of their
establishment ; and, nobly used, aid it yet more by
their existence. That is to say, among every active
and well-governed people, the various strength of
individuals, tested by full exertion and specially
applied to various need, issues in unequal, but
;

harmonious results, receiving reward or authority
according to its class and service x while, in the
inactive or ill-governed nation, the gradations of
decay and the victories of treason work out also
their own rugged system of subjection and success;
and substitute, for the melodious inequalities of
concurrent power, the iniquitous dominances and
depressions of guilt and misfortune.
32. Thus the circulation of wealth in a nation
resembles that of the blood in the natural body.
There is one quickness of the current which comes
of cheerful emotion or wholesome exercise; and
another which comes of shame or of fever. There
is a flush of the body which is full of warmth
and life; and another which will pass into putre-
faction.
The analogy will hold, down even to minute par-
ticulars. For as diseased local determination of the
1 " Your bad workman, idler, and rogue —what are you to
do with him? "
We will consider of this presently: remember that the
administration of a complete system of national commerce
and industry cannot be explained in full detail within the
space of twelve pages. Meantime, consider whether, there
being confessedly some difficulty in dealing with rogues and
idlers, it may not be advisable to produce as few of them as
possible. If you examine into the history of rogues, you will
find they are as truly manufactured articles as anything else,
and it is just because our present system of political economy
gives so large a stimulus to that manufacture that you may
know it to be a false one. We had better seek for a system
which will develop honest men, than for one which will deal
cunningly with vagabonds. Let us reform our schools, and we
shall find little reform needed in our prisons.
D
50 UNTO THIS LAST
blood involves depression of the general health of
the system, all morbid local action of riches will
be found ultimately to involve a weakening of the
resources of the body politic.
The mode in which this is produced may be at once
understood by examining one or two instances of
the development of wealth in the simplest possible
circumstances.
33. Suppose two sailors cast away on an unin-
habited coast, and obliged to maintain themselves
there by their own labour for a series of years.
If they both kept their health, and worked steadily,
and in amity with each other, they might build
themselves a convenient house, and in time come
to possess a certain quantity of cultivated land,
together with various stores laid up for future use.
All these things would be real riches or property;
and, supposing the men both to have worked equally
hard, they would each have right to equal share or
use of it. Their political economy would consist
merely in careful preservation and just division of
these possessions. Perhaps, however, after some time
one or other might be dissatisfied with the results
of their common farming; and they might in con-
sequence agree to divide the land they had brought
under the spade into equal shares, so that each might
thenceforward work in his own field and live by it.
Suppose after this arrangement had been made, one
of them were to fall ill, and be unable to work on
—
his land at a critical time say of sowing or harvest.
He would naturally ask the other to sow or reap
for him.
Then his companion might say, with perfect justice,
V I will do this additional work for you; but if I do
it, you must promise to do as much for me at another
time. I will count how many hours I spend on your

ground, and you shall give me a written promise
to work for the same number of hours on mine,
whenever I need your help, and you are able to
give it."
34. Suppose the disabled man's sickness to con-
tinue, and that under various circumstances, for
several years, requiring the help of the other, he on
each occasion gave a written pledge to work, as soon
as he was able, at his companion's orders, for the
same number of hours which the other had given
up to him. What will the positions of the two men
be when the invalid is able to resume work ?
Considered as a " Polis," or state, they will be
poorer than they would have been otherwise poorer :
by the withdrawal of what the sick man's labour

v/ould have produced in the interval. His friend may
perhaps have toiled with an energy quickened by the
enlarged need, but in the end his own land and
property must have suffered by the withdrawal of
so much of his time and thought from them; and
the united property of the two men will be certainly
less than it would have been if both had remained in
health and activity.
But the relations in which they stand to each other
52 UNTO THIS LAST
are also widely altered. The sick man has not only
pledged his labour for some years, but will probably
have exhausted his own share of the accumulated
stores, and will be in consequence for some time
dependent on the other for food, which he can only
" pay " or reward him for by yet more deeply
pledging his own labour.
Supposing the written promises to be held entirely
valid (among civilised nations their validity is secured
by legal measures 1), the person who had hitherto
worked for both might now, if he chose, rest alto-
gether, and pass his time in idleness, not only forcing
his companion to redeem all the engagements he had
already entered into, but exacting from him pledges
for further labour, to an arbitrary amount, for what
food he had to advance to him.
35. There might not, from first to last, be the least
illegality (in the ordinary sense of the word) in the
1
The disputes which exist respecting the real nature of
money arise more from the disputants examining its functions
on different sides, than from any real dissent in their opinions.
All money, properly so called, is an acknowledgment of debt;
but as such, it may either be considered to represent the
labour and property of the creditor, or the idleness and
penury of the debtor. The intricacy of the question has been
much increased by the (hitherto necessary) use of marketable
commodities, such as gold, silver, salt, shells, etc., to give
intrinsic value or security to currency ;but the final and best
definition of money is that it is a documentary promise
ratified and guaranteed by the nation to give or find a certain
quantity of labour on demand. A man's labour for a day is
a better standard of value than a measure of any produce,
because no produce ever maintains a consistent rate of
productibility.
arrangement; but if a stranger arrived on the coast
at this advanced epoch of their political economy,
he would find one man commercially Rich the other ;
commercially Poor. He would see, perhaps with no

small surprise, one passing his days in idleness; the
other labouring for both, and living sparely, in the
hope of recovering his independence, at some distant
period.
This is, an example of one only out of
of course,
many ways which inequality of possession may
in
be established between different persons, giving rise
to the Mercantile forms of Riches and Poverty. In
the instance before us, one of the men might from
the first have deliberately chosen to be idle, and to
put his life in pawn for present ease; or he might
have mismanaged his land, and been compelled
to have recourse to his neighbour for food and help,
pledging his future labour for it. But what I want
the reader to note especially is the fact, common to
a large number of typical cases of this kind, that the
establishment of the mercantile wealth which consists
in a claim upon labour, signifies a political diminution
of the real wealth which consists in substantial
possessions.
36. Take another example, more consistent with
the ordinary course of affairs of trade. Suppose that
three men, instead of two, formed the little isolated
republic, and found themselves obliged to separate
in order to farm different pieces of land at some
distance from each other along the coast each estate
;
54 UNTO THIS LAST
furnishing a distinct kind of produce, and each more
or less in need of the material raised on the other.
Suppose that the third man, in order to save the time
of all three, undertakes simply to superintend the
transference of commodities from one farm to the
other; on condition of receiving some sufficiently
remunerative share of every parcel of goods conveyed,
or of some other parcel received in exchange for it.
If this carrier or messenger always brings to each
estate, from the other, what is chiefly wanted, at the
right time, the operations of the two farmers will go
on prosperously, and the largest possible result in
produce, or wealth, will be attained by the little
community. But suppose no intercourse between
the landowners is possible, except through the
travelling agent; and that, after a time, this agent,
watching the course of each man's agriculture, keeps
back the articles with which he has been entrusted
until there comes a period of extreme necessity for
them, on one side or other, and then exacts in ex-
change for them all that the distressed farmer can
spare of other kinds of produce it is easy to see that
;
by ingeniously watching his opportunities, he might

possess himself regularly of the greater part of the
superfluous produce of the two estates, and at last,
in some year of severest trial or scarcity, purchase
both for himself, and maintain the former proprietors
thenceforward as his labourers or his servants.
37. This would be a case of commercial wealth
acquired on the exactest principles of modern political
economy. But more distinctly even than in the
former instance, it is manifest in this that the wealth
of the State, or of the three men considered as a
society, is collectively less than it would have been
had the merchant been content with juster profit.
The operations of the two agriculturists have been
cramped to the utmost and the continual limitations
;
of the supply of things they wanted at critical times,

together with the failure of courage consequent on
the prolongation of a struggle for mere existence,
without any sense of permanent gain, must have
seriously diminished the effective results of their
labour; and the accumulated in the
stores finally
merchant's hands will not in any wise be of equivalent
value to those which, had his dealings been honest,
would have filled at once the granaries of the farmers
and his own.
The whole question, therefore, respecting not only
the advantage, but even the quantity, of national
wealth, resolves itself finally into one of abstract
justice. It is impossible to conclude, of any given
mass of acquired wealth, merely by the fact of its
existence, whether it signifies good or evil to the
nation in the midst of which it exists. Its real value
depends on the moral sign attached to it, just as
sternly as that of a mathematical quantity depends
on the algebraical sign attached to it. Any given
accumulation of commercial wealth may be indicative,
on the one hand, of faithful industries, progressive
energies, and productive ingenuities; or, on the
56 UNTO THIS LAST
other, it may be indicative of mortal luxury, merci-
less tyranny, ruinous chicane. Some treasures are

heavy with human tears, as an ill-stored harvest
with untimely rain; and some gold is brighter in
sunshine than it is in substance.
(
38. And these are not, observe, merely moral

or pathetic attributes of riches, which the seeker of
riches may, if he chooses, despise ; they are literally
and sternly, material attributes of riches, depreciating
or exalting, incalculably, the monetary signification
of the sum in question. One mass of money is the
—
outcome of action which has created, another, of
—
action which has annihilated, ten times as much
in the gathering of it; such and such strong hands
have been paralysed, as if they had been numbed by
nightshade: so many strong men's courage broken,
so many productive operations hindered; this and
the other false direction given to labour, and lying
image of prosperity set up, on Dura plains dug into
seven-times-heated furnaces. That which seems to
be wealth may in verity be only the gilded index
of far-reaching ruin; a wrecker's handful of coin
gleaned from the beach to which he has beguiled
an argosy; a camp-follower's bundle of rags un-
wrapped from the breasts of goodly soldiers dead;
the purchase-pieces of potter's fields, wherein shall
be buried together the citizen and the stranger.
And therefore, the idea that directions can be
given for the gaining of wealth, irrespectively of
the consideration of its moral sources, or that any
general and technical law of purchase and gain can
be set down for national practice, is perhaps the most
insolently futile of all that ever beguiledmen through
their vices. So far as I know, there is not in history
record of anything so disgraceful to the human
intellect as the modern idea that the commercial
text, " Buy in the cheapest market and sell in the
dearest," represents, or under any circumstances
could represent, an available principle of national
economy. Buy in the cheapest market? yes; but —
what made your market cheap? Charcoal may be
cheap among your roof timbers after a fire, and bricks
may be cheap in your streets after an earthquake;
but fire and earthquake may not therefore be national
benefits. Sell in the dearest? —yes, truly; but what
made your market dear? You sold your bread well
to-day was it to a dying man who gave his last coin
;
for it, and will never need bread more, or to a rich

man who to-morrow will buy your farm over your
head; or to a soldier on his way to pillage the bank
in which 3ôu have put your fortune ?
None of these things you can know. One thing only
you can know, namely, whether this dealing of yours
is a just and faithful one, which is all you need con-
cern yourself about respecting it; sure thus to have

done your own part in bringing about ultimately
in the world a state of things which will not issue in
pillage or in death. And thus every question concern-
ing these things merges itself ultimately in the great
question of justice, which, the ground being thus
58 UNTO THIS LAST
far cleared for it, I will enter upon in the next paper,
leaving only, in this, three final points for the reader's

consideration.
39. It has been shown that the chief value and
virtue of money consists in its having power over
human beings that, without this power, large material
;
possessions are useless, and to any person possessing

such power, comparatively unnecessary. But power
over human beings is attainable by other means
than by money. As I said a few pages back, the
money power is always imperfect and doubtful;
there are many things which cannot be reached with
it, others which cannot be retained by it. Many joys
may be given to men which cannot be bought for
gold, and many fidelities found in them which cannot
be rewarded with it.
Trite enough, —the reader thinks. Yes: but it is
— —
not so trite, I wish it were, that in this moral
power, quite inscrutable and immeasurable though
it be, there is a monetary value just as real as that
represented by more ponderous currencies. A man's

hand may be full of invisible gold, and the wave of
it, or the grasp, shall do more than another's with a
shower of bullion. This invisible gold, also, does not

necessarily diminish in spending. Political economists
will do well some day to take heed of it, though they
cannot take measure.
But farther. Since the essence of wealth consists
in its authority over men, if the apparent or nominal
wealth fail in this power, it fails in essence; in fact,
—
ceases to be wealth at all. does not appear lately
It
in England, that our authority over men is absolute.
The servants show some disposition to rash riotously
upstairs, under an impression that their wages are
not regularly paid. We should augur ill of any
gentleman's property to whom this happened every
other day in his drawing-room.
So also, the power of our wealth seems limited as
respects the comfort of the servants, no less than
their quietude. The persons in the kitchen appear
to be ill-dressed, squalid, half -starved. One cannot
help imagining that the riches of the establishment
must be of a very theoretical and documentary
character.
40. Finally. Since the essence of wealth consists
inpower over men, will it not follow that the nobler
and the more in number the persons are over whom
ithas power, the greater the wealth? Perhaps it may
even appear after some consideration, that the
—
persons themselves are the wealth that these pieces
of gold with which we are in the habit of guiding
them, are, in fact, nothing more than* a kind of
Byzantine harness or trappings, very glittering and
beautiful in barbaric sight, wherewith we bridle the
creatures; but that if these same living creatures
could be guided without the fretting and jingling of
the Byzants in their mouths and ears, they might
themselves be more valuable than their bridles.
In fact, it may be discovered that the true veins of
—
wealth are purple and not in Rock, but in Flesh
—
6o UNTO THIS LAST
perhaps even that the final outcome and consum-
mation of all wealth is in the producing as many
as possible full-breathed, bright-eyed, and happy-
hearted human creatures. Our modern wealth, I
think, has rather a tendency the other way; — most
political economists appearing to consider multitudes
of human creatures not conducive to wealth, or at
best conducive to it only by remaining in a dim-eyed
and narrow-chested state of being.
41. Nevertheless, it is open, I repeat, to serious
question, which I leave to the reader's pondering,
whether, among national manufactures, that of
Souls of a good quality may not at last turn out a
quite leadingly lucrative one ? Nay, in some far-away
and yet undreamt-of hour, I can even imagine that
England may cast all thoughts of possessive wealth
back to the barbaric nations among whom they first
arose; and that, while the sands of the Indus and
adamant of Golconda may yet stiffen the housings
of the charger, and flash from the turban of the slave,
she, as a Christian mother, may at last attain to the
virtues and the treasures of a Heathen one, and be
able to lead forth her Sons, saying,
" These are my Jewels."
ESSAY III
QUI JUDICATIS TERRAM
42. Some centuries before the Christian era, a Jew

merchant, largely engaged in business on the Gold
Coast, and reported to have made one of the largest
fortunes of his time, (held also in repute for much
practical sagacity,) left among his ledgers some
general maxims concerning wealth, which have been
preserved, strangely enough, even to our own days.
They were held in considerable respect by the most
active traders of the middle ages, especially by the
Venetians, who even went so far in their admiration
as to place a statue of the old Jew on the angle of
one of their principal public buildings. Of late years
these writings have fallen into disrepute, being op-
posed in every particular to the spirit of modern
commerce. Nevertheless I shall reproduce a passage
or two from them here, partly because they may
interest the reader by their novelty; and chiefly
because they will show him that it is possible for a
very practical and acquisitive tradesman to hold,
through a not unsuccessful career, that principle of
distinction between well-gotten and ill-gotten wealth,
61
62 UNTO THIS LAST
which, partially insisted on in my last paper, it
must be our work more completely to examine in
this.
43. He says, for instance, in one place: "The
getting of treasures by a lying tongue is a vanity
tossed to and fro of them that seek death " adding :
in another, with the same meaning (he has a curious

way of doubling his sayings)" Treasures of wicked-
:
ness profit nothing: but justice delivers from death."

Both these passages are notable for their assertion
of death as the only real issue and sum of attainment
by any unjust scheme of wealth. If we read, instead
of " lying tongue," " lying label, title, pretence, or
advertisement," we shall more clearly perceive the
bearing of the words on modern business. The
seeking of death is a grand expression of the true
course of men's toil in such business. We usually
speak as if death pursued us, and we fled from him;
but that is only so in rare instances. Ordinarily
—
he masks himself makes himself beautiful all- —
glorious; not like the King's daughter, all-glorious
within, but outwardly: his clothing of wrought gold.
We pursue him frantically all our days, he flying or
hiding from us. Our crowning success at three-score
and ten is utterly and perfectly to seize, and hold
him in his eternal integrity —robes, ashes, and sting.
Again: the merchant says, "He that oppresseth
the poor to increase his riches, shall surely come to
want." And again, more strongly: " Rob not the
poor because he is poor; neither oppress the afflicted
—— :
QUI JUDICATIS TERRAM 63

in the place of business. For God shall spoil the soul
of those that spoiled them."
This " robbing the poor because he is poor," is
especially the mercantile form of theft, consisting
in taking advantage of a man's necessities in order
to obtain his labour or property at a reduced price.
The ordinary highwayman's opposite form of robbery
— of the rich, because he is rich —
does not appear to
occur so often to the old merchant's mind probably ;
because, being less profitable and more dangerous

than the robbery of the poor, it is rarely practised
by persons of discretion.
44. But the two most remarkable passages in
their deep general significance are the following:
" The rich and the poor have met. God is their
maker."
" The rich and the poor have met. God is their
light."
They " have "
more literally, have stood in
met :
each other's way (obviaverunt) That is to say, as long

.
as the world lasts, the action and counteraction of

wealth and poverty, the meeting, face to face, of
rich and poor, is just as appointed and necessary a
law of that world as the flow of stream to sea, or the
interchange of power among the electric clouds:
" God is their maker." But, also, this action may be
either gentle andjust, or convulsive and destructive
it may be by rage of devouring flood, or by lapse of
serviceable wave; —in blackness of thunderstroke, or
continual force of vital fire, soft, and shapeable into
— —
64 UNTO THIS LAST
love-syllables from far away. And which of these
it depends on both rich and poor knowing
shall be,
that God is their light that in the mystery of human
;
life, there is no other light than this by which they
can see each other's faces, and live; light, which—

is called in another of the books among which the
merchant's maxims have been preserved, the " sun

of justice," x of which it is promised that it shall rise
at last with " healing " (health-giving or helping,
making whole or setting at one) in its wings. For
truly this healing is only possible by means of jus-
tice; no love, no no hope will do it; men will
faith,
—
be unwisely fond vainly faithful, unless primarily
they are just; and the mistake of the best men
through generation after generation, has been that
great one of thinking to help the poor by almsgiving,
,* More accurately, Sun of Justness but, instead of the harsh

;
word " Justness," the old English " Righteousness " being
commonly employed, has, by getting confused with " godli-
ness," or attracting about it various vague and broken
meanings, prevented most persons from receiving the force
"
of the passages in which it occurs. The word " righteousness
properly refers to the justice of rule, or right, as distinguished
from " equity," which refers to the justice of balance. More
broadly, Righteousness is King's justice; and Equity,
Judge's justice; the King guiding or ruling all, the Judge
dividing or discerning between opposites (therefore the
double question, " Man, who made me a ruler diKaarijs or —
—
a divider fMepiorrris over you? "). Thus, with respect to
the Justice of Choice (selection, the feebler and passive
—
we have from lego, lex, legal, loi, and loyal; and
justice),
with respect to the Justice of Rule (direction, the stronger
—
and active justice), we have from rego, rex, regal, roi, and
royal.
:

and by preaching of patience or of hope, and by every
other means, emollient or consolatory, except the one
thing which God orders for them, justice. But this
justice, with its accompanying holiness or helpful-
ness, being even by the best men denied in its trial
time, is by the mass of men hated whenever it appears
so that, when the choice was one day fairly put to
them, they denied the Helpful One and the Just; 1
and desired a murderer, sedition-raiser, and robber
—
to be granted to them; the murderer instead of the
Lord of Life, the sedition-raiser instead of the Prince
of Peace, and the robber instead of the Just Judge of
all the world.
45. I have just spoken of the flowing of streams
to the sea as a partial image of the action of wealth.
In one respect not a partial, but a perfect image.
it is
The popular economist thinks himself wise in having

discovered that wealth, or the forms of property in
general, must go where they are required that where
;
demand is, supply must follow. He farther declares

that this course of demand and supply cannot be
forbidden by human laws. Precisely in the same
sense, and with the same certainty, the waters of the
world go where they are required. Where the land
falls, the water flows. The course neither of clouds
nor rivers can be forbidden by human will. But the
disposition and administration of them can be altered
by human forethought. Whether the stream shall
1
In another place written with the same meaning, " Just,
and having salvation."
—:
66 UNTO THIS LAST

be a curse or a blessing, depends upon man's labour,
and administrating intelligence. For centuries after
centuries, great districts of the world, rich in soil,
and favoured have lain desert under the
in climate,
rage of their own nor only desert, but plague-
rivers ;
struck. The stream which, rightly directed, would

have flowed in soft irrigation from field to field
would have purified the air, given food to man and
beast, and carried their burdens for them on its
—
bosom now overwhelms the plain, and poisons the
wind; its breath pestilence, and its work famine.
In like manner this wealth " goes where it is required."
No human laws can withstand its flow. They can
only guide it: but this, the leading trench and
limiting mound can do so thoroughly, that it shall
—
become water of life the riches of the hand of
wisdom; 1 or, on the contraty, by leaving it to its
own lawless flow, they may make it, what it has been
too often, the last and deadliest of national plagues
—
water of Marah the water which feeds the roots of
all evil.
The necessity of these laws of distribution or
restraint is curiously overlooked in the ordinary
political economist's definition of his own " science."
He calls it, shortly, the " science of getting rich."
But there are many sciences, as well as many arts, of
getting rich.Poisoning people of large estates, was
one employed largely in the middle ages adulteration ;
1 " Length of days in her right hand ; in her left, riches and
honour."
of food of people of small estates, is one employed
largely now. The ancient and honourable Highland
method of blackmail; the more modern and less
honourable system of obtaining goods on credit, and
the other variously improved methods of appropria-
tion—which, in major and minor scales of industry,
down to the most artistic pocket-picking, we owe to
recent genius, —
all come under the general head of
sciences, or arts, of getting rich.
46. So that it is clear the popular economist, in
calling his science the science par excellence of getting
rich, must attach some peculiar ideas of limitation
to its character. I hope I do not misrepresent him,
by assuming that he means his science to be the
science of " getting rich by legal or just means."
In this definition, is the word " just," or " legal,"
finally to stand? For it is possible among certain
nations, or under certain rulers, or by help of certain
advocates, that proceedings may be legal which are
by no means just. If, therefore, we leave at last only
the word " just " in that place of our definition, the
insertion of this solitary and small word will make
a notable difference in the grammar of our science.
For then it will follow that, in order to grow rich
scientifically, we must grow rich justly; and, there-
fore, know what is just; so that our economy will
no longer depend merely on prudence, but on juris-
—
prudence and that of divine, not human law.
Which prudence is indeed of no mean order, hold-
ing itself, as it were, high in the air of heaven, and
68 UNTO THIS LAST
gazing for ever on the light of the sun of justice;
hence the souls which have excelled in it are repre-
sented by Dante as stars, forming in heaven for ever
the figure of the eye of an eagle: they having been
in life the discerners of light from darkness; or to
the whole human race, as the light of the body,
which is the eye; while those souls which form the
wings of the bird (giving power and dominion to
justice, " healing in its wings ") trace also in light
the inscription in heaven: " diligite justitiam
qui judicatis terram." " Ye who judge the earth,
give " (not, observe, merely love, but) " diligent
love to justice: " the love which seeks diligently,
that is to say, choosingly, and by preference, to all
things else. Which judging or doing judgment in
the earth is, according to their capacity and position,
required not of judges only, nor of rulers only, but
of all men a truth sorrowfully lost sight of even by
:
those who are ready enough to apply to themselves

passages in which Christian men are spoken of as
called to be " saints " (i.e. to helpful or healing
functions); and " chosen to be kings " (i.e. to know-
ing or directing functions) ; the true meaning of these
titleshaving been long lost through the pretences
of unhelpful and unable persons to saintly and kingly
character; also through the once popular idea that
both the sanctity and royalty are to consist in wearing
long robes and high crowns, instead of in mercy and
judgment whereas all true sanctity is saving power,
;
as all true royalty is ruling power; and injustice is

'

part and parcel of the denial of such power, which
I*
makes men as the creeping things, as the fishes of
the sea, that have no ruler over them." 1
47. Absolute justice is indeed no more attainable
than absolute truth; but the righteous man is
distinguished from the unrighteous by his desire and
hope of justice, as the true man from the false by
his desire and hope of truth. And though absolute
justice be unattainable, as much justice as we need
for all practical use is attainable by all those who
make it their aim.
We have to examine, then, in the subject before
us, what are the laws of justice respecting payment
of —
labour no small part, these, of the foundations
of all jurisprudence.
I reduced, in my last paper, the idea of money
payment to its simplest or radical terms. In those
terms its nature, and the conditions of justice respect-
ing can be best ascertained.
it,
Money payment, as there stated, consists radically

in a promise to some person working for us, that for
the time and labour he spends in our service to-day
we will give or procure equivalent time and labour in
his service at any future time when he may demand it. 2
1
It being the privilege of the fishes, as it is of rats and
wolves, to live by the laws of demand and supply; but the
distinction of humanity, to live by those of right.
%
It might appear at first that the market price of labour
expressed such an exchange: but this is a fallacy, for the
market price is the momentary price of the kind of labour
required, but the just price is its equivalent of the productive
labour of mankind. This difference will be analysed in its
70 UNTO THIS LAST
If we promise to give him less labour than he has
given us, we under-pay him. we promise to give
If
him more labour than he has given us, we over-pay
him. In practice, according to the laws of demand
and supply, when two men are ready to do the work,
and only one man wants to have it done, the two
men under-bid each other for it; and the one who
gets it to do, is under-paid. But when two men want
the work done, and there is only one man ready to
do it, the two men who want it done over-bid each
other, and the workman is over-paid.
48. I will examine these two points of injustice in
succession; but first I wish the reader to clearly
understand the central principle, lying between the
two, of right or just payment.
When we ask a service of any man, he may either
give it us freely, or demand payment for it. Respect-
ing free gift of service, there is no question at present,
that being a matter of affection not of traffic. —
But if he demand payment for it, and we wish to
treat him with absolute equity, it is evident that
this equity can only consist in giving time for time,
strength for strength, and skill for skill. If a man
works an hour for us, and we only promise to work
place. It must be noted also that I speak here only of the

exchangeable value of labour, not of that of commodities.
The exchangeable value of a commodity is that of the labour
required to produce it, multiplied into the force of the demand
for it. If the value of the labour —x and the force of demand
=y, the exchangeable value of the commodity is xy, in
which if either x—o, or y=o, xy=o.
half-an-hour for him in return, we obtain an unjust
advantage. on the contrary, we promise to work
If,
an hour and a half for him in return, he has an unjust

advantage. The justice consists in absolute exchange;
or, if there be any respect to the stations of the
parties, it will not be in favour of the employer:

there is certainly no equitable reason in a man's being
poor, that if he give me a pound of bread to-day, I
should return him less than a pound of bread to-
morrow; or any equitable reason in a man's being
uneducated, that if he uses a certain quantity of
skill and knowledge in my service, I should use a
less quantity of skill and knowledge in his. Perhaps,
ultimately, it may appear desirable, or, to say the
least, gracious, that I should give in return some-
what more than I received. But at present, we are
concerned on the law of justice only, which is that
of perfect and accurate exchange; —
one circumstance
only interfering with the simplicity of this radical
—
idea of just payment that inasmuch as labour
(rightly directed) is fruitful just as seed is, the fruit
(or " interest," as it is called) of the labour first given,
or " advanced," ought to be taken into account,
and balanced by an additional quantity of labour
in the subsequent repayment. Supposing the repay-
ment to take place at the end of a year, or of any
other given time, this calculation could be approxi-
mately made; but as money (that is to say, cash)
payment involves no reference to time (it being
optional with the person paid to spend what he
12 UNT.O THIS LAST
receives at once or after any number of years), we
can only assume, generally, that some slight advan-
tage must in equity be allowed to the person who
advances the labour, so that the typical form of
bargain will be: If you give me an hour to-day,
I will give you an hour and five minutes on demand.
If you give me a pound of bread to-day, I will give
you seventeen ounces on demand, and so on. All
that is necessary for the reader to note is, that the
amount returned is at least in equity not to be less
than the amount given.
The abstract idea, then, of just or due wages, as
respects the labourer, is that they will consist in a
sum of money which will at any time procure for
him at least as much labour as he has given, rather
more than less. And this equity or justice of payment
is, observe, wholly independent of any reference to
the number of men who are willing to do the work.

I want a horseshoe for my horse. Twenty smiths,
or twenty thousand smiths, may be ready to forge
it; their number does not in one atom's weight affect
the question of the equitable payment of the one who
does forge it. It costs him a quarter of an hour of
hislife, and so much skill and strength of arm to make
that horseshoe for me. Then at some future time I

am bound in equity to give a quarter of an hour,
and some minutes more, of my life (or of some other
person's at my disposal), and also as much strength of
arm and skill, and a little more, in making or doing
what the smith may have need of.
;

49. Such being the abstract theory of just re-
munerative payment, its application is practically
modified by the fact that the order for labour, given
in payment, is general, while labour received is
special. The current coin or document is practically
an order on the nation for so much work of any kind
and this universal applicability to immediate need
renders it so much more
valuable than special labour
can be, that an order for a less quantity of this
general toil will always be accepted as a just equiva-
lent for a greater quantity of special toil. Any given
craftsman will always be willing to give an hour of
his own work in order to receive command over half-
an-hour, or even much less, of national work. This
source of uncertainty, together with the difficulty
of determining the monetary value of skill, 1 renders
the ascertainment (even approximate) of the proper
wages of any given labour in terms of a currency
matter of considerable complexity. But they do not
affect the principle of exchange. The worth of the
1
Under the term " skill " I mean to include the united
force of experience, intellect, and passion in their operation
on manual labour: and under the term " passion," to include
the entire range and agency of the moral feelings; from the
simple patience and gentleness of mind which will give con-
tinuity and fineness to the touch, or enable one person to
work without fatigue, and with good effect, twice as long as
another, up to the qualities of character which render science
possible —
(the retardation of science by envy is one of the
most tremendous losses in the economy of the present cen-
tury) —
and to the incommunicable emotion and imagination
which are the first and mightiest sources of all value in art.
74 UNTO THIS LAST
work may not be easily known; but it has a worth,
just as fixed and real as the specific gravity of a
substance, though such specific gravity may not be
easily ascertainable when the substance is united
with many others. Nor is there so much difficulty
or chance in determining it as in determining the
ordinary maxima and minima of vulgar political
economy. There are few bargains in which the buyer
can ascertain with anything like precision that the
seller would have taken no less; —
or the seller acquire
more than a comfortable faith that the purchaser
would have given no more. This impossibility, of
precise knowledge prevents neither from striving
to attain the desired point of greatest vexation and
injury to the other, nor from accepting it for a
scientific principle that he is to buy for the least and
sell for the most possible, though what the real least
or most may be he cannot tell. In like manner, a
just person lays it down for a scientific principle that
he is to pay a just price, and, without being able
precisely to ascertain the limits of such a price, will
nevertheless strive to attain the closest possible
approximation to them. A practically serviceable
approximation he can obtain. It is easier to determine
scientifically what a man ought to have for his work,
than what his necessities will compel him to take
for it. His necessities can only be ascertained by
empirical, but his due by analytical, investigation.
In the one case, you try your answer to the sum like
—
a puzzled schoolboy till you find one that fits; in
the other, you bring out your, result within certain
limits, by process of calculation.
50. Supposing, then, the just wages of any quantity
of given labour to have been ascertained, let us
examine the first results of just and unjust payment,
when in favour of the purchaser or employer; i.e.
when two men are ready to do the work, and only one
wants to have it done.
The unjust purchaser forces the two to bid against
each other till he has reduced their demand to its
lowest terms. Let us assume that the lowest bidder
offers to do the work at half its just price.
The purchaser employs him', and does not employ
the other. The first or apparent result is, therefore,
that one of the two men is left out of employ, or to
starvation, just as definitely as by the just procedure
of giving fair price to the best workman. The various
writers who endeavoured to invalidate the positions
of my first paper never saw this, and assumed that
the unjust hirer employed both. He employs both no
more than the just hirer. The only difference (in
the outset, is that the just man pays sufficiently,
the unjust man insufficiently, for the labour of the
single person employed.
I say, " in the outset "; for this first or apparent
difference is not the actual difference. By the unjust

procedure, half the proper price of the work is left
in the hands of the employer. This enables him to
hire another man at the same unjust rate, on some
other kind of work; and the final result is that he
76 UNTO THIS LAST
has two men working for him at half price, and two
are out of employ.
51. By the just procedure, the whole price of the
first piece of work goes into the hands of the man
who does it. No surplus being left in the employer's

hands, he cannot hire another man for another piece
of labour. But by precisely so much as his power is
diminished, the hired workman's power is increased;
that is to say, by the additional half of the price he
has received; which additional half he has the power
of using toemploy another man in his service. I
moment, the least favourable,
will suppose, for the
—
though quite probable, case that, though justly
treated himself, he yet will act unjustly to his sub-
ordinate; and hire at half-price, if he can. The final
result will then be, that one man works for the
employer, at just price; one for the workman, at
half-price; and two, as in the first case, are still out
of employ. These two, as I said before, are out of
employ in both cases. The difference between the
just and unjust procedure does not lie in the number
of men hired, but in the price paid to them, and the
persons by whom it is paid. The essential difference,
that which I want the reader to see clearly, is, that
in the unjust case, two men work for one, the first
hirer. In the just case, one man works for the first
hirer, one for the person hired, and so on, down or
up through the various grades of service the influence
;
being carried forward by justice, and arrested by

injustice. The universal and constant action of
;
QUI JUDICATIS TERRAM J7

justice in this matter is therefore to diminish the
power of wealth, in the hands of one individual,
over masses of men, and to distribute it through a
chain of men. The actual power exerted by the
wealth is the same in both cases; but by injustice
it is put all into one man's hands, so that he directs at
once and with equal force the labour of a circle of

men about him; by the just procedure, he is per-
mitted to touch the nearest only, through whom,
with diminished force, modified by new minds, the
energy of the wealth passes on to others, and so till
it exhausts itself.
52. The immediate operation of justice in this

respect is therefore to diminish the power of wealth,
first in acquisition of luxury, and, secondly, in exercise
of moral influence. The employer cannot concentrate

so multitudinous labour on his own interests, nor
can he subdue so multitudinous mind to his own will.
But the secondary operation of justice is not less
important. The insufficient payment of the group of
men working for one, places each under a maximum
of difficulty in rising above his position. The tend-
ency of the system is to check advancement. But
the sufficient or just payment, distributed through a
descending series of offices or grades of labour, gives
each subordinated person fair and sufficient means
of rising in the social scale, if he chooses to use them
and thus not only diminishes the immediate power of
wealth, but removes the worst disabilities of poverty.
53. It is on this vital problem that the entire
78 UNTO THIS LAST
destiny of the labourer is ultimately dependent.
Many minor may
sometimes appear to
interests
interfere with it, but all branch from it. For instance,
considerable agitation is often caused in the minds of
the lower classes when they discover the share which
they nominally, and to all appearance, actually,
pay out of their wages in taxation (I believe thirty-
five or forty per cent.). This sounds very grievous;
but in reality the labourer does not pay it, but his
employer. If the workman had not to pay it, his
wages would be less by just that sum: competition
would still reduce them to the lowest rate at which
life was possible. Similarly the lower orders agitated
for the repeal of the corn laws, 1 thinking they would
1
I have to acknowledge an interesting communication on
the subject of free trade from Paisley (for a short letter from
" A Well-wisher " at my thanks are yet more due).
,
But the Scottish writer will, I fear, be disagreeably surprised

to hear, that I am, and always have been, an utterly fearless
and unscrupulous free-trader. Seven years ago, speaking
of the various signs of infancy in the European mind {Stones
of Venice, vol. hi. p. 168), I wrote: " The first principles of
commerce were acknowledged by the English Parliament only
a few months ago, in its free-trade measures, and are still
so little understood by the million, that no nation dares to
abolish its custom-houses."
It will be observed that I do not admit even the idea of
reciprocity. Let other nations, if they like, keep their ports
shut; every wise nation will throw its own open. It is not
the opening them, but a sudden, inconsiderate, and blunder-
ingly experimental manner of opening them, which does the
harm. If you have been protecting a manufacture for a long
series of years, you must not take the protection off in a
t
moment, so as to throw every one of its operatives at once
out of employ, any more than you must take all its wrappings
be better off if bread were cheaper; never perceiving
that as soon as bread was permanently cheaper,
wages would permanently fall in precisely that pro-
portion. The corn laws were rightly repealed; not,
however, because they directly oppressed the poor,
but because they indirectly oppressed them in causing
a large quantity of their labour to be consumed
un productively So all unnecessary taxation oppresses
.
them, through destruction of capital, but the destiny

of the poor depends primarily always on this one
question of dueness of wages. Their distress (irrespec-
tively of that caused by sloth, minor error, or crime)
arises on the grand scale from the two reacting forces
of competition and oppression. There is not yet,
nor will yet for ages be, any real over-population
offa feeble child at once in cold weather, though the cumber
ofthem may have been radically injuring its health. Little
by little, you must restore it to freedom and to air.
Most people's minds are in curious confusion on the subject
of free trade, because they suppose it to imply enlarged
competition. On the contrary, free trade puts an end to
all competition. " Protection " (among various other mis-
chievous functions,) endeavours to enable one country to
compete with another in the production of an article at a
disadvantage. When trade is entirely free, no country can
be competed with in the articles for the production of which
it is naturally calculated
; nor can it compete with any other,
in the production of articles for which it is not naturally
calculated. Tuscany, for instance, cannot compete with
England in steel, nor England with Tuscany in oil. They
must exchange their steel and oil. Which exchange should
be as frank and free as honesty and the sea-winds can make
it. Competition, indeed, arises at first, and sharply, in order
to prove which is strongest in any given manufacture possible
to both; this point once ascertained, competition is at an end.
—
80 UNTO THIS LAST
in the world; or, more
but a local over-population,
unmanage-
accurately, a degree of population locally
able under existing circumstances for want of fore-
thought and sufficient machinery, necessarily shows
itself by pressure of competition; and the taking
advantage of this competition by the purchaser,
to obtain their labour unjustly cheap, consummates
at once their suffering and his own; for in this (as
I believe in every other kind of slavery) the oppressor
suffers at last more than the oppressed, and those
magnificent lines of Pope, even in all their force,
fall short of the truth
Yet, to be just to these poor men of pelf,

Each does but hate his neighbour as himself:
Damned to the mines, an equal fate betides
The slave that digs it, and the slave that hides.
54. The collateral and reversionary operations of

justice in this matter I shall examine hereafter (it
being needful first to define the nature of value);
proceeding then to consider within what practical
terms a juster system may be established; and ,
ultimately the vexed question of the destinies of the

unemployed workmen. 1 Lest, however, the reader
1
I should be glad if the reader would first clear the ground
for himself so far as to determine whether the difficulty lies
in getting the work or getting the pay for it. Does he consider
occupation itself to be an expensive luxury, difficult of attain-
ment, of which too little is to be found in the world ? or is
it rather that, while in the enjoyment even of the most
athletic delight, men must nevertheless be maintained, and
this maintenance is not always forthcoming? We
must be
clear on this head before going farther, as most people are
should be alarmed at some of the issues to which
our investigations seem to be tending, as if in their
bearing against the power of wealth they had some-
thing in common with those of socialism, I wish him
to know, in accurate terms, one or two of the main
points which I have in view.
Whether socialism has made more progress among
the army and navy (where payment is made on my
among the manufacturing operatives
principles), or
(who are paid on my opponents' principles), I leave
it to those opponents to ascertain and declare.
Whatever their conclusion may be, I think it necessary
to answer for myself only this : that if there be any
one point insisted on throughout my works more
frequently than another, that one point is the im-
possibility of Equality. My continual aim has been
loosely in the habit of talking of the difficulty of " finding

employment." Is it employment that we want to find, or '
support during employment? Is it idleness we wish to put

an end to, or hunger? We have to take up both questions
in succession, only not both at the same time. No doubt that
work is a luxury, and a very great one. It is, indeed, at once
a luxury and a necessity; no man can retain either health
of mind or body without it. So profoundly do I feel this, that,
as will be seen in the sequel, one of the principal objects I
would recommend to benevolent and practical persons, is to
induce rich people to seek for a larger quantity of this luxury
than they at present possess. Nevertheless, it appears by
experience that even this healthiest of pleasures may be
indulged in to excess, and that human beings are just as
liable to surfeit of labour as to surfeit of meat; so that, as
on the one hand, it may be charitable to provide, for some
people, lighter dinner, and more work, — for others, it may
be equally expedient to provide lighter work, and more dinner.
F
82 UNTO THIS LAST
to show the eternal superiority of some men to others,
sometimes even of one man to all others; and to
show also the advisability of appointing such persons
or person to guide, to lead, or on occasion even to
compel and subdue, their inferiors, according to their
own better knowledge and wiser will. My principles
of Political Economy were all involved in a single
phrase spoken three years ago at Manchester:
" Soldiers of the Ploughshare as well as Soldiers of
the Sword: " and they were all summed in a single
sentence in the last volume of Modem Painters —
" Government and co-operation are in all things the
Laws of Life; Anarchy and competition the Laws
of Death."
And with respect to the mode in which these general
principles affect the secure possession of property,
so far am from invalidating such security, that the
I
whole papers will be found ultimately
gist of these
to aim at an extension in its range; and whereas
it has long been known and declared that the poor
have no right to the property of the rich, I wish it

also to be known and declared that the rich have no
right to the property of the poor.
55. But that the working of the system which I
have undertaken to develop would in many ways
shorten the apparent and direct, though not the
unseen and collateral, power, both of wealth, as the
Lady of Pleasure, and of capital as the Lord of Toil,
I do not deny: on the contrary, I affirm it in all
joyfulness; knowing that the attraction of riches
is already too strong, as their authority is already too
weighty, for the reason of mankind. I said in my

last paper that nothing in history had ever been so
disgraceful to human intellect as the acceptance
among us of the common doctrines of political
economy as a science. I have many grounds for saying
this, but one of the chief may be given in few words.
I know no previous instance in history of a nation's
establishing a systematic disobedience to the first
principles of its professed religion. The writings which
we (verbally) esteem as divine, not only denounce
the love of money as the source of all evil, and as
an idolatry abhorred of the Deity, but declare mam-
mon service to be the accurate and irreconcileable
opposite of God's service and, whenever they speak
:
of riches absolute, and poverty absolute, declare woe

to the rich, and blessing to the poor. Whereupon we
forthwith investigate a science of becoming rich, as
the shortest road to national prosperity.
Tai Cristian dannera l'Etiope,

Quando si partiranno i due collegi,
L'UNO IN ETERNO RICCO, E L'ALTRO INdPE.
ESSAY IV
AD VALOREM
56. In the last paper we saw that just payment of

labour consisted in a sum of money which would
approximately obtain equivalent labour at a future
time we have now to examine the means of obtain-
:
ing such equivalence. Which question involves the

definition of Value, Wealth, Price, and Produce.
None of these terms are yet denned so as to be
understood by the public. But the last, Produce,,
which one might have thought the clearest of all,
is, in use, the most ambiguous; and the examination
of the kind of ambiguity attendant on its present

employment will best open the way to our work.
In his chapter on Capital, 1 Mr. J. S. Mill instances,
as a capitalist, a hardware manufacturer, who,
having intended to spend a certain portion of the
proceeds of his business in buying plate and jewels,
changes his mind, and " pays it as wages to additional
workpeople." The effect is stated by Mr. Mill to be,
that " more food is appropriated to the consumption
of productive labourers."
57. Now I do not ask, though, had I written this
ôok I., Ch. iv., s. 1.
84
:
AD VALOREM 85
paragraph, itwould surely have been asked of me,
What is to become of the silversmiths? If they are
truly unproductive persons, we will acquiesce in their
extinction. And though another part of the same
in
passage, the hardware merchant is supposed also
to dispense with a number of servants, whose " food
is thus set free for productive purposes," I do not
inquire what will be the effect, painful or otherwise,

upon the servants, of this emancipation of their food.
But I very seriously inquire why ironware is produce,
and silverware is not? That the merchant consumes
the one, and sells the other, certainly does not con-
stitute the difference, unless it can be shown (which,
indeed, I perceive it to be becoming daily more and
more the aim of tradesmen to show) that com-
modities are made to be sold, and not to be consumed.
The merchant is an agent of conveyance to the con-
sumer in one case, and is himself the consumer in
the other 1 but the labourers are in either case equally
1
If Mr. Mill had wished to show the difference in result
between consumption and sale, he should have represented
the hardware merchant as consuming his own goods instead
them; similarly, the silver merchant as consuming
of selling
his own goods instead of selling them. Had he done this, he
would have made his position clearer, though less tenable;
and perhaps this was the position he really intended to take,
tacitly involving his theory, elsewhere stated, and shown
in the sequel of this paper to be false, that demand for
commodities not demand for labour. But by the most
is
diligent scrutiny of the paragraph now under examination,
I cannot determine whether it is a fallacy pure and simple,
or the half of one fallacy supported by the whole of a
greater one; so that I treat it here on the kinder assump-
tion that it is one fallacy only.
86 UNTO THIS LAST
productive, since they have produced goods to the same
value, if the hardware and the plate are both goods.
And what distinction separates them ? It is indeed
possible that in the " comparative estimate of the
moralist/' with which Mr. Mill says political economy
has nothing to do (III. i. 2), a steel fork might appear
a more substantial production than a silver one
we may grant also that knives, no less than forks,
are good produce; and scythes and ploughshares
serviceable articles. But, how of bayonets? Sup-
posing the hardware merchant to effect large sales
of these, by help of the " setting free " of the fooc
of his servants and his silversmith, is —
he still
employing productive labourers, or, in Mr. Mill's
words, labourers who increase " the stock of per-
manent means of enjoyment " (I. iii. 4) ? Or if,
instead of bayonets, he supply bombs, will not the

absolute and final " enjoyment " of even these ener-
which costs tei
getically productive articles (each of
pounds 1) be dependent on a proper choice of tim(
and place for their enfantement; choice, that is t(
say, depending on those philosophical considerations
with which political economy has nothing to do?
1
1 take Mr. Helps' estimate in his essay on War.
2
Also when the wrought silver vases of Spain were dashed
to fragments by our custom-house officers, because bullion
might be imported free of duty, but not brains, was the axe
—
that broke them productive? the artist who wrought them
unproductive ? Or again. If the woodman's axe is productive,
is the executioner's ? as also, if the hemp of a cable be pro-
ductive, does not the productiveness of hemp in a halter
depend on its moral more than on its material application ?
AD VALOREM 87
58. I should have regretted the need of pointing
out inconsistency in any portion of Mr. Mill's work,
had not the value of his work proceeded from its
inconsistencies. He deserves honour among econo-
mists by inadvertently disclaiming the principles which
he states, and tacitly introducing the moral considera-
tions with which he declares his science has no con-
nection. Many of his chapters are, therefore, true and
valuable and the only conclusions of his which
; I have
to dispute are those which follow from his premises.
Thus, the idea which lies at the root of the passage
we have just been examining, namely, that labour
applied to produce luxuries will not support so many
persons as labour applied to produce useful articles,
is entirely true but the instance given fails and in
; —
four directions of failure at once -because Mr. Mill —
has not denned the real meaning of usefulness. The
definition which he has given
—
" capacity to satisfy
a desire, or serve a purpose " (III. i. 2) -applies —
equally to the iron and silver ; while the true definition
—which he has not given, but which nevertheless
underlies the false verbal definition in his mind, and
comes out once or twice by accident (as in the words
" any support to life or strength " in I. i. 5) applies —
to some articles of iron, but not to others, and to some
articles of silver, but not to others. It applies to
ploughs, but not to bayonets; and to forks, but not
to filigree. 1
1 Filigree: that is to say, generally, ornament dependent

on complexity, not on art.
a
88 UNTO THIS LAST

59. The eliciting of the true definition will give
"
us the reply to our first question, " What is value?
respecting which, however, we must first hear the
popular statements.
" The word value/ when used without adjunct,
'
always means, in political economy, value in

exchange " (Mill, III. i. 3). So that, if two ships
cannot exchange their rudders, their rudders
are, in politico-economic language, of no value to
either.
But " the subject of political economy is wealth."
— (Preliminary remarks, page 1.)
And wealth " consists of all useful and agreeable
objects which possess exchangeable value." (Pre- —
liminary remarks, page 10.)
It appears, then, according to Mr. Mill, that useful-
ness and agreeableness underlie the exchange value,
and must be ascertained to exist in the thing, before
we can esteem it an object of wealth.
Now, the economical usefulness of a thing depends
not merely on its own nature, but on the number
of people who can and will use it. A horse is use-
less, and therefore unsaleable, if no one can ride, —
sword if no one can strike, and meat, if no one can
eat. Thus every material utility depends on its
relative human capacity.
Similarly: The agreeableness of a thing depends
not merely on its own likeableness, but on the number
of people who can be got to like it. The relative
agreeableness, and therefore saleableness, of " a pot
:
AD VALOREM 89
of the smallest ale," and of " Adonis painted by a
running brook," depends virtually on the opinion
of Demos, in the shape of Christopher Sly. That
is to say, the agreeableness of a thing depends on
its relative human disposition. 1 Therefore, political

economy, being a science must be a science
of wealth,
respecting human capacities and But
dispositions.
moral considerations have nothing to do with political
economy (III. i. 2). Therefore, moral considerations
have nothing to do with human capacities and dis-
positions.
60. I do not wholly like the look of this con-
clusion —
from Mr. Mill's statements: let us try Mr.
Ricardo's.
" Utility is not the measure of exchangeable value,
though it is absolutely essential to it." —(Chap. I.
sect, i.) what degree, Mr. Ricardo?

Essential in
There may be greater and less degrees of utility.
Meat, for instance, may be so good as to be fit for
any one to eat, or so bad as to be fit for no one to
1
These statements sound crude in their brevity but will ;
be found of the utmost importance when they are developed.

Thus, in the above instance, economists have never perceived
that disposition to buy is a wholly moral element in demand
that is to say, when you give a man half-a-crown, it depends
—
on his disposition whether he is rich or poor with it whether
he will buy disease, ruin, and hatred, or buy health, advance-
ment, and domestic love. And thus the agreeableness
or exchange value of every offered commodity depends
on production, not merely of the commodity, but of
buyers of it; therefore on the education of buyers, and
on all the moral elements by which their disposition
to buy this, or that, is formed.
90 UNTO THIS LAST
eat. What is the exact degree of goodness which
is " essential " to its exchangeable value, but not
" the measure " of it? How good must the meat be,
in order to possess any exchangeable value; and
how bad must it be — (I wish this were a settled
question in London markets) —in order to possess
none?
There appears to be some hitch, I think, in the
working even of Mr. Ricardo's principles; but let
him take his own example. " Suppose that in the
early stages of society the bows and arrows of the
hunter were of equal value with the implements of
the fisherman. Under such circumstances the value
of the deer, the produce of the hunter's day's labour,
would be exactly " (italics mine) " equal to the value
of the fish, the product of the fisherman's day's
labour. The comparative value of the fish and
game would be entirely regulated by the quantity
of labour realised in each." (Ricardo, chap. iii. On
Value.)
Indeed! Therefore, if the fisherman catches one
sprat, and the huntsman one deer, one sprat will be
equal in value to one deer; but if the fisherman
catches no sprat, and the huntsman two deer, no
sprat will be equal in value to two deer ?
—
Nay; but Mr. Ricardo's supporters may say-
—
he means, on an average; if the average product
of a day's work of fisher and hunter be one fish
and one deer, the one fish will always be equal
in value to the one deer.
AD VALOREM 91
Might I inquire the species of fish. Whale? or
x
whitebait?
It would be a waste of time to pursue these fallacies
farther; we will seek for a true definition.
1
Perhaps it may be said, in farther support of Mr. Ricardo,
that he meant, " when the utility is constant or given, the
price varies as the quantity of labour." If he meant this,
he should have said it; but, had he meant it, he could have
hardly missed the necessary result, that utility would be one
measure of price (which he expressly denies it to be); and
that, to prove saleableness, he had to prove a given quantity
of utility, as well as a given quantity of labour: to wit, in
his own instance, that the deer and fish would each feed the
same number of men, for the same number of days, with
equal pleasure to their palates. The fact is, he did not
know what he meant himself. The general idea which he
had derived from commercial experience, without being
able to analyse it, was, that when the demand is constant,
the price varies as the quantity of labour required for
—
production; or, using the formula I gave in last paper —
when y is constant, xy varies as x. But demand never is, nor
can be, ultimately constant, if x varies distinctly; for, as
price rises, consumers fall away; and as soon as there is a
monopoly (and all scarcity is a form of monopoly; so that
every commodity is affected occasionally by some colour
of monopoly), y becomes the most influential condition of
the price. Thus the price of a painting depends less on its
merits than on the interest taken in it by the public; the
price of singing less on the labour of the singer than the
number of persons who desire to hear him; and the price of
gold less on the scarcity which affects it in common with
cerium or iridium, than on the sunlight colour and unalter-
able purity by which it attracts the admiration and answers
the trust of mankind.
It must be kept in mind, however, that I use the word
" demand " in a somewhat different sense from economists
usually. They mean by it " the quantity of a thing sold."
I mean by it " the force of the buyer's capable intention to
—
92 UNTO THIS LAST
61. Much store has been set for centuries upon the
use of our English classical education. It were to be
wished that our well-educated merchants recalled
to mind always this much of their Latin schooling,
that the nominative of valorem (a word already
sufficiently familiar to them) is valor; a word which,
therefore, ought to be familiar to them. Valor, from
valere, to —
be well, or strong (vy Latvia); strong,
in life (if a man), or valiant; strong, for life (if a
thing), or valuable. To be " valuable," therefore, is
to " avail towards life." A truly valuable or avail-
ing thing is that which leads to life with its whole
strength. In proportion as it does not lead to life,

or as its strength is broken, it is less valuable; in
proportion as it leads away from life, it is unvaluable
or malignant.
The value of a thing, therefore, is independent of
opinion, and of quantity. Think what you will of
it, gain how much you may of it, the value of the
thing itself is neither greater nor less. For ever it

avails, or avails not no estimate can raise, no disdain
;
buy." In good English, a person's " demand " signifies, not

what he gets, but what he asks for.
Economists also do not notice that objects are not valued
by absolute bulk or weight, but by such bulk and weight as
is necessary to bring them into use. They say, for instance,
that water bears no price in the market. It is true that a
cupful does not, but a lake does; just as a handful of dust
does not, but an acre does. And were it possible to make
even the possession of the cupful or handful permanent
(i.e. to find a place for them), the earth and sea would
be bought up by handfuls and cupfuls.
AD VALOREM 93
depress, the power which it holds from the Maker
of things and of men.
The real science of political economy, which has
yet to be distinguished from the bastard science, as
medicine from witchcraft, and astronomy from
astrology, is that which teaches nations to desire
and labour for the things that lead to life and which ;
teaches them to scorn and destroy the things that

lead to destruction. And if, in a state of infancy,
they suppose indifferent things, such as excrescences
of shell-fish, and pieces of. blue and red stone, to be
valuable, and spend large measure of the labour
which ought to be employed for the extension and
ennobling of life, in diving or digging for them, and
cutting them into various shapes, —or in the same
if,
state of infancy, they imagine precious and beneficent

and cleanliness, to be value-
things, such as air, light,
less, —or if, they imagine the conditions of
finally,
their own existence, by which alone they can truly
possess or use anything, such, for instance, as peace,
trust, and love, to be prudently exchangeable, when
the market offers, for gold, iron, or excrescences of
shells —
the great and only science of Political
Economy teaches them, in all these cases, what is
vanity, and what substance; and how the service
of Death, the Lord of Waste, and of eternal empti-
ness, differs from the service of Wisdom, the Lady
of Saving, and of eternal fullness; she who has
said, " I will cause those that love me to inherit
Substance; and I will fill their treasures."
94 UNTO THIS LAST
The " Lady of Saving," in a profounder sense than
that of the savings' bank, though that is a good one:
Madonna della Salute, —
Lady of Health which, —
though commonly spoken of as if separate from wealth,
is indeed a part of wealth. This word, " wealth," it
will be remembered, is the next we have to define.
62. " To be wealthy," says Mr. Mill, is "to have a
large stock of useful articles."
I accept this definition. Only let us perfectly under-
stand it. My opponents often lament my not giving
them enough logic: I fear I must at present use a
little more than they will like; but this business of
Political Economy is no light one, and we must allow
no loose terms in it.
We have, therefore, to ascertain in the above

what is the meaning of "having," or
definition, first,
the nature of Possession. Then, what is the meaning
of " useful," or the nature of Utility.
And first At the crossing of the
of possession.
transepts of Milan Cathedral has lain, for three
hundred years, the embalmed body of St. Carlo
Borromeo. It holds a golden crosier, and has a cross
of emeralds on its breast. Admitting the crosier and
emeralds to be useful articles, is the body to be
considered as "having" them? Do they in the
politico-economical sense of property, belong to it?
If not, and if we may, therefore, conclude generally
that a dead body cannot possess property, what
degree and period of animation in the body will
render possession possible?
;:
AD VALOREM 95
As thus: lately in a wreck of a Calif ornian ship,
one of the passengers fastened a belt about him with
two hundred pounds of gold in it, with which he
was found afterwards at the bottom. Now, as he
—
was sinking had he the gold? or had the gold
1
him?
And if, instead of sinking him in the sea by its
weight, the gold had struck him on the forehead, and
thereby caused incurable disease —suppose palsy or
insanity, —
would the gold in that case have been more
a " possession " than in the first? Without pressing
the inquiry up through instances of gradually in-
creasing vital power over the gold (which I will,
however, give, if they are asked for), I presume the
reader will see that possession, or " having," is not
an absolute, but a graduated, power; and consists
not only in the quantity or nature of the thing
possessed, but also (and in a greater degree) in its
suitableness to the person possessing it, and in his
vital power to use it.
And our definition of Wealth, expanded, becomes
" The possession of useful articles, which we can use."
This is a very serious change. For wealth, instead of
depending merely on a "have," is thus seen to
depend on a " can." Gladiator's death, on a habet "
'
'
but soldier's victory, and state's salvation, on a " quo

plurimum posset." (Liv. VII. 6.) And what we
reasoned of only as accumulation of material, is seen
to demand also accumulation of capacity.
1 Compare George Herbert, The Church Porch, Stanza 28.
96 UNTO THIS LAST
63. So much for our verb. Next for our adjective.
What is the meaning of " useful " ?
The inquiry is closely connected with the last. For
what is capable of use in the hands of some persons,
is capable, in the hands of others, of the opposite of
use, called commonly, " from-use " or " ab-use."
And itdepends on the person, much more than on
the whether its usefulness or ab-usefulness
article,
will be the quality developed in it. Thus, wine, which
the Greeks, in their Bacchus, made, rightly, the type
of all passion, and which, when used, " cheereth god
and man " (that is to say, strengthens both the divine
life, or reasoning power, and the earthly, or carnal
power, of man) yet, when abused, becomes " Dio-

;
nusos," hurtful especially to the divine part of man,

or reason. And again, the body itself, being equally
liable to use and to abuse, and, when rightly disci-
plined, serviceable to the State, both for war and
labour; —but when not disciplined, or abused, value-
less to the State, and capable only of continuing
the private or single existence of the individual (and
—
that but feebly) the Greeks called such a body an
" idiotic " or " private " body, from their word
signifying a person employed in no way directly
useful to the State; whence, finally, our "idiot,"
meaning a person entirely occupied with his own
concerns.
Hence, it follows, that if a thing is to be useful, it
must be not only of an availing nature, but in availing

hands. Or, in accurate terms, usefulness is value
;
AD VALOREM 97
in the hands of the valiant; so that this science of
wealth being, as we have just seen, when regarded
as the Science of Accumulation, accumulative of
—
capacity as well as of material, when regarded as the
Science of Distribution, is distribution not absolute,
but discriminate; not of every thing to every man,
but of the right thing to the right man. A difficult
science, dependent on more than arithmetic.
64. Wealth, therefore, is " the possession of the
valuable by the valiant " and in considering it
;
as a power existing in a nation, the two elements,

the value of the thing, and the valour of its possessor,
must be estimated together. Whence it appears that
many of the persons commonly considered wealthy,
are in reality no more wealthy than the locks of their
own strong boxes are; they being inherently and
eternally incapable of wealth; and operating for
the nation, in an economical point of view, either as
pools of dead water, and eddies in a stream (which,
so long as the stream flows, are useless, or serve only
to drown people, but may become of importance
in a state of stagnation, should the stream dry);
or else, as dams in a river, of which the ultimate
service depends not on the dam, but the miller; or
else, as mere accidental stays and impediments,
acting, not as wealth, but (for we ought to have
a correspondent term) as " illth," causing various
devastation and trouble around them in all directions
or lastly, act not at all, but are merely animated
conditions of delay (no use being possible of anything
98 UNTO THIS LAST
they have until they are dead), in which last con-
dition they are nevertheless often useful as delays,
and " impedimenta," if a nation is apt to move too
fast.
65. This being so, the difficulty of the true science
of PoliticalEconomy lies not merely in the need of
developing manly character to deal with material
value, but in the fact, that while the manly char-
acter and material value only form wealth by their
conjunction, they have nevertheless a mutually
destructive operation on each other. For the manly
character is apt to ignore, or even cast away, the
—
material value: whence that of Pope:
Sure, of qualities demanding praise,

More go to ruin fortunes, than to raise.
And on the other hand, the material value is apt to

undermine the manly character; so that it must be
our work, in the issue, to examine what evidence
there is of the effect of wealth on the minds of its
possessors; also, what kind of person it is who
usually sets himself to obtain wealth, and succeeds
in doing so; and whether the world owes more
gratitude to rich or to poor men, either for the moral
influence upon it, or for chief goods, discoveries, and
practical advancements. I may, however, anticipate
future conclusions so far as to state that in a com-
munity regulated only by laws of demand and supply,
but protected from open violence, the persons who
become rich are, generally speaking, industrious, re-
AD VALOREM 99
solute, proud, covetous, prompt, methodical, sensible,
unimaginative, insensitive, and ignorant. The persons
who remain poor are the entirely foolish, the en-
tirely wise, 1 the idle, the reckless, the humble, the
thoughtful, the dull, the imaginative, the sensitive,
the well-informed, the improvident, the irregularly
and impulsively wicked, the clumsy knave, the open
thief, and the entirely merciful, just, and godly
person.
66. Thus Next, we have to
far then of wealth.
ascertain the nature of Price; that is to say, of
exchange value, and its expression by currencies.
Note first, of exchange, there can be no profit in it.
It is only in labour there can be profit that is to say —
a " making in advance," or " making in favour of "
(from proficio). In exchange, there is only advantage,
i.e. a bringing of vantage or power to the exchanging
persons. Thus, one man, by sowing and reaping, turns

one measure of corn into two measures. That is
Profit. Another by digging and forging, turns one
spade into two spades. That is Profit. But the man
who has two measures of corn wants sometimes to
dig; and the man who has two spades wants some-
—
times to eat: They exchange the gained grain for
the gained tool; and both are the better for the
exchange; but though there is much advantage
in the transaction, there is no profit. Nothing is
1
6 Zeus drjirov irevercu. — Arist., Plut. 582. It would but
weaken the grand words to lean on the preceding ones on rod
:
IXXotfrov 7ra/?ex w (3e\rlovas } dvdpas, /ecu rrjv yvdifj.Tjv, /ecu ttjv ideav.
ioo UNTO THIS LAST
constructed or produced. Only that which had been
before constructed is given to the person by whom it
can be used. If labour is necessary to effect the

exchange, that labour is in reality involved in the
production, and, like all other labour, bears profit.
Whatever number of men are concerned in the manu-
facture, or in the conveyance, have share in the
profit; but neither the manufacture nor the con-
veyance are the exchange, and in the exchange itself
there is no profit.
There may, however, be acquisition, which is a
very different thing. If, in the exchange, one man
is able to give what cost him little labour for what has
cost the other much, he " acquires " a certain quantity

of the produce of the other's labour. And precisely
what he acquires, the other loses. In mercantile
language, the person who thus acquires is commonly
said to have " made a profit " and I ; believe that
many of our merchants are seriously under the
impression that it is possible for everybody, somehow,
to make a profit in this manner. Whereas, by the
unfortunate constitution of the world we live in,
the laws both of matter and motion have quite
rigorously forbidden universal acquisition of this
kind. Profit, or material gain, is attainable only by
construction or by discovery; not by exchange.
Whenever material gain follows exchange, for every
plus there is a precisely equal minus.
Unhappily for the progress of the science of
Political Economy, the plus quantities, or, —
if I may
;
AD VALOREM 101
—
be allowed to coin an awkward plural the pluses,
make a very positive and venerable appearance in
the world, so that every one is eager to learn the
science which produces results so magnificent;
whereas the minuses have, on the other hand, a
tendency to retire into back streets, and other places
of shade, — or even to get themselves wholly and
finally put out of sight in graves :which renders the
algebra of this science peculiar, and difficultly legible
a large number of its negative signs being written by
the account-keeper in a kind of red ink, which starva-
tion thins, and makes strangely pale, or even quite
invisible ink, for the present.
67. The Science of Exchange, or, as I hear it has
been proposed to call it, of " Catallactics," con-
sidered as one of gain, is, therefore, simply nugatory ;
but considered as one of acquisition, it is a very

curious science, differing in its data and basis from
every other science known. Thus :
—
If I can exchange
a needle with a savage for a diamond, my power of

doing so depends either on the savage's ignorance
of social arrangements in Europe, or on his want of
power to take advantage of them, by selling the
diamond to anyone else for more needles. If, farther,
I make the bargain as completely advantageous to
myself as possible, by giving to the savage a needle
with no eye in it (reaching, thus, a sufficiently satis-
factory type of the perfect operation of catallactic
science), the advantage to me in the entire transaction
depends wholly upon the ignorance, powerlessness, or
102 UNTO THIS LAST
heedlessness of the person dealt with. Do away with
these, and advantage becomes impossible.
catallactic
So far, therefore, as the science of exchange relates
to the advantage of one of the exchanging persons
only, it is founded on the ignorance or incapacity of
the opposite person. Where these vanish, it also van-
ishes. It is therefore a science founded on nescience,
and an art founded on artlessness. But all other
sciences and arts, except this, have for their object
the doing away with their opposite nescience and
artlessness. This science, alone of sciences, must,
by all available means, promulgate and prolong its
opposite nescience; otherwise the science itself is
impossible. It is, therefore, peculiarly and alone,

the science of darkness; probably a bastard science
— not by any means a divina scientia, but one begotten
of another father, that father who, advising his
children to turn stones into bread, is himself employed
in turning bread into stones, and who, if you ask a
fish of him (fish not being producible on his estate),
can but give you a serpent.
68. The general law, then, respecting just or
—
economical exchange, is simply this: There must
be advantage on both sides (or if only advantage on
one, at least no disadvantage on the other) to the
persons exchanging; and just payment for his time,
intelligence and labour, to any intermediate person
effecting the transaction (commonly called a
merchant): and whatever advantage there is on
either side, and whatever pay is given to the inter-
—
AD VALOREM 103
mediate person, should be thoroughly known to all
concerned. All attempt at concealment implies
some practice of the opposite, or undivine science,
founded on nescience. Whence another saying of
the Jew merchant's
—
"As a nail between the stone
joints, so doth sin stick fast between buying and
selling.' Which peculiar riveting of stone and timber,
'
in men's dealings with each other, is again set forth

in the house which was to be destroyed timber and —
—
stones together when Zechariah's roll (more prob-
ably " curved sword ") flew over it: " the curse that
goeth forth over all the earth upon every one that
stealethand holdeth himself guiltless," instantly
followed by the vision of the Great Measure;
the measure " of the injustice of them in all the
earth (avrrj rj aStKta avroHv kv Trda-y ry yy)> With the
'
weight of lead for its lid, and the woman, the spirit
of wickedness, within it; —
that is to say, Wicked-
ness hidden by Dullness, and formalised, outwardly,
into ponderously established cruelty. " It shall be
set upon its own base in the land of Babel." x
69. I have hitherto carefully restricted myself, in
speaking of exchange, to the use of the term ." ad-
vantage"; but that term includes two ideas; the
advantage, namely, of getting what we need, and
that of getting what we wish for. Three-fourths of
the demands existing in the world are romantic;
founded on visions, idealisms, hopes, and affections;
and the regulation of the purse is, in its essence,
1
Zech. v. 11. See note on the passage, Sect. 74.
104 UNTO THIS LAST
regulation of the imagination and the heart. Hence,
the right discussion of the nature of price is a very
high metaphysical and psychical problem; some-
times to be solved only in a passionate manner, as
by David in his counting the price of the water of
the well by the gate of Bethlehem; but its first
—
conditions are the following: The price of anything
is the quantity of labour given by the person desiring
it, in order to obtain possession of it. This price

depends on four variable quantities. A. The quantity
of wish the purchaser has for the thing; opposed to
a, the quantity of wish the seller has to keep it.
B. The quantity of labour the purchaser can afford,

to obtain the thing; opposed to (3, the quantity
of labour the seller can afford, to keep it. These
quantities are operative only in excess; i.e. the
quantity of wish (A) means the quantity of wish
for this thing, above wish for other things; and the
quantity of work (B) means the quantity which can
be spared to get this thing from the quantity needed
to get other things.
Phenomena com-
of price, therefore, are intensely
plex, curious, —
and interesting too complex, how-
ever, to be examined yet; every one of them, when
traced far enough, showing itself at last as a part of
the bargain of the Poor of the Flock (or " flock of
slaughter "), "If ye think good, give me my price,
—
and if not, forbear " Zech. xi. 12; but as the price
of everything is to be calculated finally in labour,
it is necessary to define the nature of that standard.
AD VALOREM 105
70. Labour is the contest of the life of man with
—
an opposite; the term " life " includes his intellect t .
soul, and physical power, contending with question,

difficulty, trial, or material force.
Labour is of a higher or lower order, as it includes
more or fewer of the elements of life: and labour of
good quality, in any kind, includes always as much
intellect and feeling as will fully and harmoniously
regulate the physical force.
In speaking of the value and price of labour, it
is necessary always to understand labour of a given
rank and quality, as we should speak of gold or silver
of a given standard. Bad (that is, heartless, inex-
perienced, or senseless) labour cannot be valued; it
1
is like gold of uncertain alloy, or flawed iron.
The quality and kind of labour being given, its

value, like that of all other valuable things, is in-
variable. But the quantity of it which must be given
for other things is variable: and in estimating this
1
Labour which
is entirely good of its kind, that is to say,
effective, or efficient, the Greeks called " weighable," or
&£io$, translated usually " worthy," and because thus sub-
stantial and true, they called its price tl/j.t], the " honourable
estimate" of it (honorarium): this word being founded on
their conception of true labour as a divine thing, to be
honoured with the kind of honour given to the gods whereas
;
the price of false labour, or of that which led away from life,
was to be not honour, but vengeance; for which they re-
served another word, attributing the exaction of such price
to a peculiar goddess, called Tisiphone, the " requiter (or
quittance-taker) of death"; a person versed in the highest
branches of arithmetic, and punctual in her habits; with
whom accounts current have been opened also in modern days.
io6 UNTO THIS LAST
variation, the price of other things must always be
counted by the quantity of labour; not the price
of labour by the quantity of other things.
71. Thus, if we want to plant an apple sapling in
rocky ground, it may take two hours' work; in soft
ground, perhaps only half an hour. Grant the soil
equally good for the tree in each case. Then the
value of the sapling planted by two hours' work is
nowise greater than that of the sapling planted in
half an hour. One will bear no more fruit than the
other. Also, one half-hour of work is as valuable as
another half -hour; nevertheless the one sapling has
cost four such pieces of work, the other only one.
Now the proper statement of this fact is, not that
the labour on the hard ground is cheaper than on the
soft ;but that the tree is dearer. The exchange value
may, or may not, afterwards depend on this fact.
If other people have plenty of soft ground to plant
in, they will take no cognizance of our two hours'
labour, in the price they will offer for the plant on the
rock. And if, through want of sufficient botanical
science, we have planted an upas-tree instead of an
apple, the exchange- value will be a negative quantity;
still less proportionate to the labour expended.
What is commonly called cheapness of labour,

signifies, therefore, in reality, that many obstacles
have to be overcome by it; so that much labour is
required to produce a small result. But this should
never be spoken of as cheapness of labour, but as
dearness of the object wrought for. It would be just
AD VALOREM 107
as rational to say that walking was cheap, because
we had ten miles to walk home to our dinner, as that
labour was cheap, because we had to work ten hours
to earn it.
The last word which we have to define is " Pro-
duction."
72. I have hitherto spokenof all labour as profit-
able; because impossible to consider under one
it is
head the quality or value of labour, and its aim. But

labour of the best quality may be various in aim. It
may be either constructive (" gathering," from con
and struo), as agriculture; nugatory, as jewel-
cutting; or destructive ("scattering," from de and
struo), as war. It is not, however, always easy to
prove labour, apparently nugatory, to be actually
so; 1 generally, the formula holds good: "he that
gathereth not, scattereth"; thus, the jeweller's art
is probably very harmful in its ministering to a
clumsy and inelegant pride. So that, finally, I believe

nearly all labour may be shortly divided into positive
and negative labour: positive, that which produces
1
The most accurately nugatory labour is, perhaps, that
of which not enough is given to answer a purpose effectually,
and which, therefore, has all to be done over again. Also,
labour which fails of effect through non-co-operation. The
cure of a little village near Bellinzona, to whom I had ex-
pressed wonder that the peasants allowed the Ticino to flood
their fields, told me that they would not join to build an
effectual embankment high up the valley, because everybody
said " that would help his neighbours as much as himself."
So every proprietor built a bit of low embankment about his
own field; and the Ticino, as soon as it had a mind, swept
away and swallowed all up together.
;
io8 UNTO THIS LAST

life; negative, that which produces death; the mosi
directly negative labour being murder, and the most
directly positive, the bearing and rearing of children
so that in the precise degree in which murder is hateful,
on the negative side of idleness, in that exact degree
child-rearing is admirable, on the positive side of
idleness. For which reason, and because of the honour
1
that there is in rearing children, while the wife is
said to be as the vine (for cheering), the children are

as the olive-branch, for praise; nor for praise only,
but for peace (because large families can only be
reared in times of peace): though since, in their
spreading and voyaging in various directions, they
distribute strength, they are, to the home strength,
as arrows in the hand of a giant —
striking here and
there, far away.
Labour being thus various in its result, the pros-
perity of any nation is in exact proportion to the
quantity of labour which it spends in obtaining and
—
employing means of life. Observe, I say, obtaining
and employing; that is to say, not merely wisely
producing, but wisely distributing and consuming.
Economists usually speak as if there were no good
Observe, I say, " rearing," not " begetting." The praise
1
is in the seventh season, not in arTroprjTds, nor in (pvraXid,*

but in dirdjpa. It is strange that men always praise enthusi-
astically any person who, by a momentary exertion, saves a
life; but praise very hesitatingly a person who, by exertion
and self-denial prolonged through years, creates one. We
—
give the crown " ob civem servatum " ; why not " ob civem
natum " ? Born, I mean, to the full, in soul as well as in body.
England has oak enough, I think, for both chaplets.
AD VALOREM 109
in consumption absolute. 1
So far from this being so,
consumption absolute is the end, crown, and perfec-
tion of production; and wise consumption is a far
more difficult art than wise production. Twenty
people can gain money for one who can use it; and
the vital question, for individual and for nation, is,
never " how much do they make? " but " to what
"
purpose do they spend?
73. The reader may, perhaps, have been surprised
at the slight reference I have hitherto made to
" capital/' and its functions. It is here the place to
define them.
"
Capital signifies " head, or source, or root material
— it is material by which some derivative or secondary,
good is produced. It is only capital proper (caput

vivum, not caput mortuum) when it is thus producing
something different from itself. It is a root, which
does not enter into vital function till it produces
something else than a root; namely, fruit. That
fruit will in time again produce roots; and so all
living capital issues in reproduction of capital; but
capital which produces nothing but capital is only
root producing root; bulb issuing in bulb, never in
tulip; seed issuing in seed, never in bread. The
Political Economy of Europe has hitherto devoted
itself wholly to the multiplication, or (less even) the
aggregation, of bulbs. It never saw, nor conceived
1
When Mr. Mill speaks of productive consumption, he only-
means consumption which results in increase of capital, or
material wealth. See I. iii. 4, and I. iii. 5.
no UNTO THIS LAST
such a thing as a tulip. Nay, boiled bulbs they might
have — —
been glass bulbs Prince Rupert's drops,
consummated in powder (well, if it were glass-powder
and not gunpowder), for any end of meaning the
economists had in defining the laws of aggregation.
We will try and get a clearer notion of them.
The best and simplest general type of capital is
a well-made ploughshare. Now, if that ploughshare
did nothing but beget other ploughshares, in a
—
polypous manner, however the great cluster of
polypous plough might glitter in the sun, it would
have lost its function of capital. It becomes true
capital only by another kind of splendour, when it —
is seen,
" splendescere sulco," to grow bright in the
furrow; rather with diminution of its substance,
than addition, by the noble friction. And the true
home question, to every capitalist and to every nation,
is not, "how many ploughs have you?"
— but, —
"where are your furrows?" not "how quickly
will this capital reproduce itself?
" —
but, " what will
it do during reproduction?
" What substance will
it furnish, good for life? what work construct,
protective of life? if none, its own reproduction is
useless —
if —
worse than none, (for capital may de-
stroy life as well as support it), its own reproduction
is worse than useless it is merely an advance from
;
—
Tisiphone, on mortgage not a profit by any means.
74. Not a profit, as the ancients truly saw, and
—
showed in the type of Ixion; for capital is the head,
—
or fountain head, of wealth the " well-head " of
AD VALOREM in
wealth, as the clouds are the well-heads of rain but :
when clouds are without water, and only beget clouds,

they issue in wrath at last, instead of rain, and in
lightning instead of harvest; whence Ixion is said
first to have invited his guests to a banquet, and then
made them fall into a pit filled with fire; which is
the type of the temptation of riches issuing in im-

—
prisoned torment, torment in a pit, (as also Demas'
silver mine,) after which, to show the rage of riches
passing from lust of pleasure to lust of power, yet
power not truly understood, Ixion is said to have
desired Juno, and instead, embracing a cloud (or
phantasm), to have begotten the Centaurs; the
power of mere wealth being, in itself, as the embrace
of a shadow, —
comfortless (so also " Ephraim feedeth
on wind and followeth after the east wind"; or
—
"that which is not" Pro v. xxiii. 5; and again
Dante's Geryon, the type of avaricious fraud, as he
flies, gathers the air up with retractile claws,
—
" l'aer
a se raccolse," x ) but in its offspring, a mingling of
1 So also in the vision of the women bearing the ephah,
before quoted, " the wind was in their wings," not wings
"of a stork," as in our version; but " milvi," of a kite, in
the Vulgate, or perhaps more accurately still in the
Septuagint, " hoopoe," a bird connected typically with the
power of riches by many traditions, of which that of its
petition for a crest of gold is perhaps the most interesting.
The Birds of Aristophanes, in which its part is principal,
are full of them; note especially the " fortification of the air
with baked bricks, like Babylon," 1. 550; and, again, compare
the Plutus of Dante, who (to show the influence of riches
in destroying the reason) is the only one of the powers of
the Inferno who cannot speak intelligibly; and also the
—
ii2 UNTO THIS LAST
the brutal with the human nature human in sagacity
:
— using both intellect and arrow; but brutal in its

body and hoof, for consuming, and trampling down.
For which sin Ixion is at last bound upon a wheel
hery and toothed, and rolling perpetually in the air;
— the type of human labour when selfish and fruitless
(kept far into the middle ages in their wheel of
fortune); the wheel which has in it no breath or
spirit, but is whirled by chance only; whereas of all
Irue work the Ezekiel vision is true, that the Spirit
of the living creature is in the wheels, and where the
angels go, the wheels go by them; but move no
otherwise.
75. This being the real nature of capital, it follows
that there are two kinds of true production, always
going on in an active state; one of seed, and one of
food; or production for the Ground, and for the
Mouth; both of which are by covetous persons
thought to be production only for the granary;
whereas the function of the granary is but inter-
mediate -and conservative, fulfilled in distribution;
else it ends in nothing but mildew, and nourishment
of rats and worms. And since production for the
Ground is only useful with future hope of harvest,
all essential production is for the Mouth; and is
finally measured by the mouth; hence, as I said
cowardliest; he is not merely quelled or restrained, but

literally "collapses" at a word; the sudden and helpless
operation of mercantile panic being all told in the brief
metaphor, " as the sails, swollen with the wind, fall, when
the mast breaks."
;
AD VALOREM 113
above, consumption is the crown of production; and
the wealth of a nation is only to be estimated by
what it consumes.
The want of any clear sight of this fact is the
capital error, issuing in rich interest and revenue of
error among the political economists. Their minds
are continually set on money-gain, not on mouth-gain
and they fall into every sort of net and snare, dazzled
by the coin-glitter as birds by the fowler's glass;
or rather (for there is not much else like birds in
them) they are like children trying to jump on
the heads of their own shadows; the money-gain
being only the shadow of the true gain, which is
humanity.
76. The economy, there-
final object of political
good method of consumption, and great
fore, is to get
quantity of consumption: in other words, to use
everything, and to use it nobly; whether it be sub-
stance, service, or service perfecting substance. The
most curious error in Mr. Mill's entire work (provided
for him originally by Ricardo), is his endeavour to
distinguish between direct and indirect service, and
consequent assertion that a demand for commodities
is not demand for labour (I. v. 9, et seq.). He dis-
tinguishes between labourers employed to lay out
pleasure grounds, and to manufacture velvet;
declaring that it makes material difference to the
labouring classes in which of these two ways a
capitalist spends his money; because the employ-
ment of the gardeners is a demand for labour, but
H
H4 UNTO THIS LAST
the purchase of velvet is not. 1 Error colossal as well
as strange. It will, indeed, make a difference to the
labourer whether he bid him swing his scythe in the
spring winds, or drive the loom in pestilential air;
but, so far as his pocket is concerned, it makes to him
absolutely no difference whether we order him to
make green velvet, with seed and a scythe, or red
velvet, with silk and scissors. Neither does it anywise
concern him whether, when the velvet is made, we
consume it by walking on it, or wearing it, so long as
our consumption of it is wholly selfish. But if our
consumption is to be in any wise unselfish, not only
our mode of consuming the articles we require
interests him, but also the kind of article we require
with a view to consumption. As thus (returning for
1
The value of raw material, which has, indeed, to be
deducted from the price of the labour, is not contemplated
in the passages referred to, Mr. Mill having fallen into the
mistake solely by pursuing the collateral results of the pay j
—
ment of wages to middlemen. He says " The consumer does
not, with his own funds, pay the weaver for his day's work."
Pardon me; the consumer of the velvet pays the weaver
with his own funds as much as he pays the gardener. He
pays, probably, an intermediate ship-owner, velvet merchant,
and shopman; pays carriage money, shop rent, damage
money, time money, and care money; all these are above
and beside the velvet price (just as the wages of a head
gardener would be above the grass price) but the velvet is as
;
much produced by the consumer's capital, though he does

not pay for it till six months after production, as the grass
is produced by his capital, though he does not pay the man
who mowed and rolled it on Monday, till Saturday afternoon.
I do not know if Mr. Mill's conclusion,
— " the capital cannot
be dispensed with, the purchasers can " (p. 98), has yet been
reduced to practice in the City on any large scale.
AD VALOREM 115
1
a moment to Mr. Mill's great hardware theory ):
it matters, so far as the labourer's immediate profit
is concerned, not an iron filing whether I employ
him in growing a peach, or forging a bombshell;
but my probable mode of consumption of those
articles matters seriously. Admit that it is to be in
both cases " unselfish," and the difference, to him, is
final, whether when his child is ill, I walk into his
cottage and give it the peach, or drop the shell down
his chimney, and blow his roof off.
The worst of it, for the peasant, is, that the

capitalist's consumption of the peach is apt to be
selfish, and of the shell, distributive ; but, in all
cases, this the broad and general fact, that on due

is
catallactic commercial principles, somebody's roof

must go off in fulfilment of the bomb's destiny.
You may grow for your neighbour, at your liking,
grapes or grape-shot; he will also, catallactically,
grow grapes or grape-shot for you, and you will each
reap what jôu have sown.
77. It is, therefore, the manner and issue of con-
sumption which are the real tests of production.
Production does not consist in things laboriously
made, but in things serviceably consumable; and
the question for the nation is not how much labour
it employs, but how much life it produces. For as
1
Which, observe, is the precise opposite of the one under
examination. The hardware theory required us to discharge
our gardeners and engage manufacturers; the velvet theory
requires us to discharge our manufacturers and engage
n6 UNTO THIS LAST
consumption is the end and aim of production, so
life is the end and aim of consumption.
I left this question to the reader's thought two

months ago, choosing rather that he should work it
out for himself than have it sharply stated to him.
But now, the ground being sufficiently broken (and
the details into which the several questions, here
opened, must lead us, being too complex for discussion
in the pages of a periodical, so that I must pursue
them elsewhere), I desire, in closing the series of
introductory papers, to leave this one great fact
clearly stated. There is no Wealth but Life.
Life, including all its powers of love, of joy, and of
admiration. That country is the richest which
nourishes the greatest number of noble and happy
human beings; that man is richest who, having
perfected the functions of his own life to the utmost,
has also the widest helpful influence, both personal,
and by means of his possessions, over the lives of
others.
A strange political economy; the only one, never-
theless, that ever was or can be all political economy
:
founded on self-interest 1 being but the fulfilment of

that which once brought schism into the Policy of
angels, and ruin into the Economy of Heaven.
j8. " The greatest number of human beings noble
and happy." But is the nobleness consistent with
1 "
In all reasoning about prices, the proviso must be
understood, supposing all parties to take care of their own
'
interest.' " — Mill, III. i. 5.

—
AD VALOREM 117
the number? Yes, not only consistent with it, but
essential to it. The maximum of life can only be

reached by the maximum of virtue. In this respect
the law of human population differs wholly from that
of animal life. The multiplication of animals is
checked only by want of food, and by the hostility
of races; the population of the gnat is restrained
by the hunger of the swallow, and that of the swallow
by the scarcity of gnats. Man, considered as an
animal, is indeed limited by the same laws; hunger,
or plague, or war, are the necessary and only restraints
upon his increase, —
effectual restraints hitherto,
his principal study having been how most swiftly
to destroy himself, or ravage his dwelling-places,
and his highest skill directed to give range to the
famine, seed to the plague, and sway to the sword.
But, considered as other than an animal, his increase
is not limited by these laws. It is limited only by
the limits of his courage and his love. Both of these
have their bounds and ought to have his race has
; :
its bounds also but these have not yet been reached,
;
nor will be reached for ages.

79. In all the ranges of human thought I know
none so melancholy as the speculations of political
economists on .the population question. It is proposed
to better the condition of the labourer by giving him
higher wages. " Nay," says the economist, " if you
raise his wages, he will either people down to the
same point of misery at which you found him, or
drink your wages away." He will. I know it. Who
;
n8 UNTO THIS LAST

gave him this will? were your own son
Suppose it
of whom you me that you dared

spoke, declaring to
not take him into your firm, nor even give him his
just labourer's wages, because if you did, he would die
of drunkenness, and leave half a score of children to
"
the parish. " Who gave your son these dispositions ?
— I should inquire. Has he them by inheritance or
bjr education ? By one or other they must come and ;
as in him, so also in the poor. Either these poor are

of a race essentially different from ours, and un-
redeemable (which, however often implied, I have
heard none yet openly say), or else by such care as
we have ourselves received, we may make them
continent and sober as ourselves wise and dis- —
—
passionate as we are models arduous of imitation.
" But," it is answered, " they cannot receive educa-
tion." Why not? That is precisely the point at issue.
Charitable persons suppose the worst fault of the
rich is to refuse the people meat; and the people
cry for their meat, kept back by fraud, to the Lord
of Multitudes. 1 Alas! it is not meat of which the
1
James v. 4. Observe, in these statements I am not taking
up, nor countenancing one whit, the common socialist idea
of division of property division of property is its destruction
;
and with it the destruction of all hope, all industry, and all
justice: it is simply chaos —a chaos towards which the
believers in modern political economy
are fast tending, and
from which I am striving to save them. The rich man does
not keep back meat from the poor by retaining his riches;
but by basely using them. Riches are a form of strength;
and a strong man does not injure others by keeping his
strength, but by using it injuriously. The socialist, seeing
—
a strong man oppress a weak one, cries out " Break the
AD VALOREM 119
refusal is cruellest, or to which the claim is validest.
The life is more than the meat. The rich not only
refuse food to the poor; they refuse wisdom; they
refuse virtue; they refuse salvation. Ye sheep
without shepherd, it is not the pasture that has been
shut from you, but the presence. Meat! perhaps
your right to that may be pleadable; but other
rights have to be pleaded first. Claim your crumbs
from the table, if you will but claim them as children,
;
not as dogs; claim your right to be fed, but claim

r ore loudly your right to be holy, perfect, and pure.
Strange words to be used of working people:
"What! holy; without any long robes nor anointing
oils; these rough-jacketed, rough-worded persons;
set to nameless and dishonoured service? Perfect!
— these, with dim eyes and cramped limbs, and slowly
strong man's arms "; but I say, " Teach him to use them to
better purpose." The fortitude and intelligence which acquire
riches are intended, by the Giver of both, not to scatter, nor
to give away, but to employ those riches in the service of
mankind; in other words, in the redemption of the erring
—
and aid of the weak that is to say, there is first to be the
work to gain money; then the Sabbath of use for it the —
Sabbath, whose law is, not to lose life, but to save. It is
continually the fault or the folly of the poor that they are
poor, as it is usually a child's fault if it falls into a pond, and
a cripple's weakness that slips at a crossing; nevertheless,
most passers-by would pull the child out, or help up the
cripple. Put it at the worst, that all the poor of the world
are but disobedient children, or careless cripples, and that
all rich people are wise and strong, and you will see at once
that neither is the socialist right in desiring to make every-
body poor, powerless, and foolish as he is himself, nor the
rich man right in leaving the children in the mire.
—
120 UNTO THIS LAST
—
wakening minds? Pure these, with sensual desire
and grovelling thought; foul of body, and coarse of
soul? " It may be so; nevertheless, such as they are,
they are the holiest, perfectest, purest persons the
earth can at present show. They may be what you
have said; but if so, they yet are holier than we,
who have left them thus.
But what can be done for them ? Who can clothe
who teach —who restrain their multitudes
? What end
can there be for them at last, but to consume one

another?
I hope for another end, though not, indeed, from
any of the three remedies for over-population com-
monly suggested by economists.
80. These three are, in brief — Colonisation;
Bringing in of waste lands; or Discouragement of
Marriage.
The first and second of these expedients merely
evade or delay the question. It will, indeed, be long
before the world has been all colonised, and its deserts
all brought under cultivation. But the radical question
is not how much habitable land is in the world, but
how many human beings ought to be maintained on

a given space of habitable land.
Observe, I say, ought to be, not how many can be.
Ricardo, with his usual inaccuracy, defines what he
calls the " natural rate of wages " as " that which will
maintain the labourer." Maintain him! yes; but
—
how? the question was instantly thus asked of me
by a working girl, to whom I read the passage. I will
AD VALOREM 121
amplify her question for her. " Maintain him, how? "
As, first, to what length of life? Out of a given
number of fed persons how many are to be old how —
many young that is to say, will you arrange their
;
maintenance so as to kill them early say at thirty —

or thirty-five on the average, including deaths of
—
weakly or ill-fed children? or so as to enable them
to live out a natural life? You will feed a greater
number, in the first case, 1 by rapidity of succession ;
probably a happier number in the second which :
does Mr. Ricardo mean to be their natural state,

and to which state belongs the natural rate of
wages ?
Again: A piece of land which will only support
ten idle, ignorant, and improvident persons, will sup-
port thirty or forty intelligent and industrious ones.
Which of these is their natural state, and to which of
them belongs the natural rate of wages ?
Again: If a piece of land support forty persons in
industrious ignorance ; and if, tired of this ignorance,
they set apart ten of their number to study the
properties of cones, and the sizes of stars; the labour
of these ten, being withdrawn from the ground, must
either tend to the increase of food in some transitional
manner, or the persons set apart for sidereal and
conic purposes must starve, or someone else starve
instead of them. What is, therefore, the natural rate
of wages of the scientific persons, and how does this
1
The quantity of life is the same in both cases ; but it is
differently allotted.
;
122 UNTO THIS LAST

rate relate to, or measure, their reverted or transitional
productiveness ?
Again: If the ground maintains, at first, forty
labourers in a peaceable and pious state of mind,
but they become in a few years so quarrelsome and
impious that they have to set apart five, to meditate
upon and settle their disputes; —ten, armed to the
teeth with costly instruments, to enforce the decisions
and remind everybody in an eloquent manner
five to
of the existence ofa God what will be the result upon
;
the general power of production, and what is the

" natural rate of wages " of the meditative, muscular,
and oracular labourers ?
81. Leaving these questions to be discussed, or
waived, at their pleasure, by Mr. Ricardo's followers,
I proceed to state the main facts bearing on that
probable future of the labouring classes which has
been partially glanced at by Mr. Mill. That chapter
and the preceding one differ from the common writing
of political economists in admitting some value in
the aspect of nature, and expressing regret at the
probability of the destruction of natural scenery.
But we may spare our anxieties, on this head. Men
can neither drink steam, nor eat stone. The maximum
of population on a given space of land implies also
the relative maximum of edible vegetable, whether
for men or cattle; it implies a maximum of pure
air; and of pure water. Therefore: a maximum of
wood, to transmute the air, and of sloping ground,
protected by herbage from the extreme heat of the
AD VALOREM 123
sun, to feed the streams. All England may, if it so
chooses, become one manufacturing town; and Eng-
lishmen, sacrificing themselves to the good of general
humanity, may live diminished lives in the midst
of noise, of darkness, and of deadly exhalation. But
the world cannot become a factory, nor a mine. No
amount of ingenuity will ever make iron digestible
by the million, nor substitute hydrogen for wine.
Neither the avarice nor the rage of men will ever
feed them, and however the apple of Sodom and the
grape of Gomorrah may spread their table for a time
—
with dainties of ashes, and nectar of asps, so long
as men live by bread, the far away valleys must laugh
as they are covered with the gold of God, and the
shouts of His happy multitudes ring round the wine-
press and the well.
82. Nor need our more sentimental economists fear
the too wide spread of the f ormalities of a mechanical
agriculture. The presence of a wise population im-
plies the search for felicity as well as for food; nor
can any population reach its maximum but through
that wisdom which " rejoices " in the habitable parts
of the earth. The desert has its appointed place and
work; the eternal engine, whose beam is the earth's
axle, whose beat is its year, and whose breath is its
ocean, will still divide imperiously to their desert
kingdoms, bound with unfurrowable rock, and swept
by unarrested sand, their powers of frost and fire:
but the zones and lands between, habitable, will be
loveliest in habitation. The desire of the heart is
;
124 UNTO THIS LAST

also the light of the eyes. No scene is continually
and untiringly loved, but one rich by joyful human
labour smooth in field fair in garden full in orchard
; ; ;
trim, sweet, and frequent in homestead ringing ;
with voices of vivid existence. No air is sweet that

is silent; it is only sweet when full of low currents
of under sound —
triplets of birds, and murmur and
chirp of insects, and deep-toned words of men, and
wayward trebles of childhood. As the art of life is
learned, it will be found at last that all lovely things
are also necessary: —the wild flower by the wayside,
as well as the tended corn; and the wild birds and
creatures of the forest, as well as the tended cattle;
because man doth
not live by bread only, but also
by the manna; by every wondrous word and
desert
unknowable work of God. Happy, in that he knew
them not, nor did his fathers know; and that round
about him reaches yet into the infinite, the amazement
of his existence.
83. Note, finally, that all effectual advancement
towards the true felicity of the human race must be
by individual, not public effort. Certain general
measures may aid, certain revised laws guide, such
advancement; but the measure and law which have
first to be determined are those of each man's home.
We continually hear it recommended by sagacious

people to complaining neighbours (usually less well
placed in the world than themselves), that they
should " remain content in the station in which
Providence has placed them." There are perhaps
AD VALOREM 125
some circumstances of life in which Providence has
no intention that people should be content. Never-
theless, the maxim is on the whole a good one; but
it is peculiarly for home use. That your neighbour
should, should not, remain content with his
or
position, not your business; but it is very much
is
your business to remain content with your own.

What is chiefly needed in England at the present
day is to show the quantity of pleasure that may
be obtained by a consistent, well-administered com-
petence, modest, confessed, and laborious. We need
examples of people who, leaving Heaven to decide
whether they are to rise in the world, decide for
themselves that they will be happy in it, and have
—
resolved to seek not greater wealth, but simpler
pleasure; not higher fortune, but deeper felicity;
making the first of possessions, self-possession; and
honouring themselves in the harmless pride and calm
pursuits of peace.
Of which lowly peace it is written that " justice
and peace have kissed each other"; and that the
fruit of justice is " sown in peace of them that make
peace " not " peace-makers " in the common under-
;
standing —
reconcilers of quarrels (though that
function also follows on the greater one) but peace- ;
Creators; Givers of Calm. Which you cannot give,

unless you first gain; nor is this gain one which will
follow assuredly on any course of business, commonly
so called. No form of gain is less probable, business
being (as is shown in the language of all nations —
—
126 UNTO THIS LAST
TrwAetv from 7reXto } Trpaa-ts from irepaoi, venire,
vendre, and venal, from venio, etc.) essentially rest-
less —and probably contentious; having a raven- —
like mind to the motion to and fro, as to the carrion
food; whereas the olive-feeding and bearing birds
look for rest for their feet thus it is said of Wisdom
:
that she " hath builded her house, and hewn out her
seven pillars " and even when, though apt to wait
;
long at the doorposts, she has to leave her house

and go abroad, her paths are peace also.
84. For us, at all events, her work must begin at
the entry of the doors: all true economy is " Law of
the house." Strive to make that law strict, simple,
generous: waste nothing, and grudge nothing. Care
in nowise to make more of money, but care to make
much ofremembering always .the great, palpable,
it ;
inevitable fact —
the rule and root of all economy
that what one person has, another cannot have; and
that every atom of substance, of whatever kind, used
or consumed, is so much human life spent; which,
if it issue in the saving present life, or gaining more,
is well spent, but if not, is either so much life pre-
vented, or so much slain. In all buying, consider,
first, what condition of existence you cause in the
producers of what you buy; secondly, whether the

sum you have paid is just to the producer, and in due
proportion, lodged in his hands; 1 thirdly, to how
1
The proper offices of middle -men, namely, overseers (or
authoritative workmen), conveyancers (merchants, sailors,
retail dealers, etc.), and order-takers (persons employed to
receive directions from the consumer), must, of course, be
AD VALOREM 127
much clear use, for food, knowledge, or joy, this that
you have bought can be put and fourthly, to whom
;
and in what way it can be most speedily and service-

ably distributed in all dealings whatsoever insisting
:
on entire openness and stern fulfilment; and in

all on perfection and loveliness of accom-
doings,
plishment; especially on fineness and purity of all
marketable commodity: watching at the same time
for all ways of gaining, or teaching, powers of simple
pleasure and of showing 60-01/ kv do-(j>o8e\a) /Aty' Sveiap
;
—
the sum of enjoyment depending not on the quantity
of things tasted, but on the vivacity and patience
of taste.
85. And if, on due and honest thought over these
things, it seems that the kind of existence to which

men are now summoned by every plea of pity and
claim of right, may, for some time at least, not be a
luxurious one; —
consider whether, even supposing
it guiltless, luxury would be desired by any of us,
if we saw clearly at our sides the suffering which
accompanies it in the world. Luxury is indeed possible

in the future —
innocent and exquisite; luxury for
all, and by the help of all; but luxury at present
can only be enjoyed by the ignorant; the cruellest
man living could not sit at his feast, unless he sat
examined before I can enter farther into the question of just
payment of the first producer. But I have not spoken of
them in these introductory papers, because the evils attendant
on the abuse of such intermediate functions result not from
any alleged principle of modern political economy, but from
private carelessness or iniquity.
128 UNTO THIS LAST
blindfold. Raise the veil boldly ; face the light ; and
if, as yet, the light of the eye can only be through
tears, and the light of the body through sackcloth,
go thou forth weeping, bearing precious seed, until
the time come, and the kingdom, when Christ's gift
of bread and bequest of peace shall be Unto this Last
as unto thee; and when, for earth's severed multi-
tudes of the wicked and the weary, there shall be
holier reconciliation than that of the narrow home,
and calm economy, where the Wicked cease not —
from trouble, but from troubling —
and the Weary
are at rest.
COMMENTARY
EDITOR'S NOTES
[The numbers refer to the sections}
AUTHOR'S PREFACE
i. The four Papers appeared
in the Cornhill Magazine
for August, September, October and November, i860,
during W. M. Thackeray's editorship.
Estimate of a weight. " Qui Judicatis Terram,"
Sect. 48, " seventeen ounces."
2. Organisation of labour with fixed wages. Partly
realised in the recent establishment of Labour Bureaux,
Wages Boards, and the minimum wage in some industries.
3. Wealth radiant and wealth reflective. Metaphor
borrowed from theory of heat. Instead of " reflective "
we should now say " radiated " or " reflected."
4. Pope's assertion. Essay on Man, IV. 247.

Orbits of economy. Ruskin suggests an analogy between
the celestial system and that of human society. Moving
stars can be deflected from their orbits, or paths in
space, by the attraction of other celestial bodies, but
they maintain their positions when no such disturbing
force acts, in obedience to Law. Cf. Hooker's Eccle-
siastical Polity, Bk. I. iv.: "Of law no less can be said
than that her voice is the harmony of the world "; also
Wordsworth's Ode to Duty:
Thou dost preserve the stars from wrong,
And the most ancient heavens, through Thee, are fresh and
strong.
I 129
130 C0MMEN1ARY
5, note. Adam Smith is here making implicit reference
to the restraints imposed by the Mediaeval Trade Guilds
upon their members; enforcing among other points a
definite standard of excellence of workmanship and of
purity of materials. He implies that competition sup-
plies the necessary incentives.
6. The sequel. Partly dealt with in some later papers

in Fraser's Magazine, afterwards collected in Munera
Pulveris.
6 (i). Training schools for youth. To a certain extent
this is being realised in the Government requiring all
Education Authorities throughout the country to pro-
vide Elementary, Secondary and Technical schools for
their areas. The "Fisher" Act of 191 8 goes farther in
establishing, sooner or later, wider Secondary and Tech-
nical education, and especially Continuation schools for
pupils already wage-earners, between the ages of 14 and 18.
Ruskin's three main sections cover the suggested
curriculum for the proposed Continuation schools:
Plenty of physical exercise and organised games in the
open air to supplement direct health teaching; much
good literature and social history, in song and story
and legend and records, as inspiration for true citizen-
ship; and efficient technical or vocational instruction.
6 (2). Manufactories and workshops. This scheme was
brought into being for the production of materials and
munitions needed for the Great War (1914-18), but
we are far from ready to adopt a similar one " for
the production and sale of every necessary of life, and
for the exercise of every useful art." The proposed
nationalisation of the industries of production is an
alternative measure, land, mines, railways, and shipping;
but a country which made its great stride forward a
EDITOR'S NOTES 131
century ago under the individualistic system of private
enterprise is reluctant to surrender that liberty. There
is considerable jealousy and distrust of Government
interference and Government enterprise, as tending
towards monopoly or inefficiency; and it has to be
confessed that the British Government had not until—
—
recent reforms amended conditions been at all a model
employer or an enterprising business manager. The
great State department, the Post Office, with its slowness
to enlarge facilities, lack of consideration for employees,
and unattractive presentment to the Public; the Army
Clothing Factories; and, abroad, the inefficient consular
service, are cases in point.
The wholesome rivalry between Government and
private enterprises might perhaps correct some of the
unfavourable features of both, if Ruskin's proposal could
be made practicable.
6 (3). Found objecting to work. Modern social re-
formers would perhaps agree with Ruskin as to the first
three sets of people, and the remedies for their condition,
but the exaggerated sensitiveness of the present day
as to the supposed " liberty of the subject," and the
general intolerance of discipline, tell against the same
agreement with him in the case of this difficult fourth.
6 (4). The old and destitute. A beginning has been
made with this in the Old Age Pensions; and the " Break-
up of the Poor Law " recommended by the Minority-
Report of the Royal Commission (191 2) will do much
to remove the stigma of honourable poverty.
De publico est elatus. Contributed by the public.
P. Valerius (d. 503 B.C.), a patriotic Roman statesman
and warrior, so far from enriching himself in his career,
died in such straitened circumstances that his estate
could not even provide the money for his funeral.
132 COMMENTARY
ESSAY I
THE ROOTS OF HONOUR

Ruskin's titles are always interesting and full of
meaning, sometimes far-fetched, but worth looking into
and puzzling over.
In "The Roots of Honour" is suggested the idea
more fully presented in Sects. 17-21, that dignity be- j
longs and honour is paid only to those whose motives

are self-sacrificing, or at least unselfish; not to those
who are actuated by self-interest only. A
much older
tradition than that of the early economists imputes low
cunning, sharp -practice, and even fraudulent dealing to
those whose occupation is solely buying to sell again.
1. Eliminate the inconstants. Ruskin uses mathema-
tical illustrationvery often for the convenience of its
symbolic language, and it has been extensively applied
by later writers on economics. In modern Algebra the
terms constants and variables are used, rather than con-
stants and inconstants. The latter term has come to
signify something of blame.
2. Not mathematically but chemically. Altering the
result, not as to quantity, but as to quality.
3. No skeletons. This ironical comparison reaches its

climax in the closing words: "deficient only in ap-
plicability"; for an applied science must thus become
valueless.
An ossifiant theory of progress. " Bony." Ossifica-
tion, or the becoming hard and rigid of substances that
should be yielding and pliable, is a form of disease. As
" progress " implies movement, growth, elasticity, the
introduction of rigidity is a hindrance.
EDITOR'S NOTES 133
Having constructed
. . . corpuscular structures. The
. . .
parable implies that having assumed the absurd structure

and built up a system of behaviour for a soul-less thing,
the granting of the supposition that man is actuated
by other than material motives would spoil the whole
theory.
4. Late strikes. In 1859 a great strike in the building
trade occurred.
6. Indeterminable. Cf. indeterminate in Theory of
Equations; i.e. more than one solution is possible.
7. Balances of expediency balances of justice. A . . .
symbolical figure of Justice bears a sword and, blind-

folded, carries a balance. What difference would you
suggest in a figure symbolical of Expediency ?
8. Calculable force . . . unknown quantity. Another
mathematical illustration.
10. An anomalous force. A force acting contrary to,

or differently from, what is expected.
11. Ruskin's view as to the relations between officers
and men in an army are especially appealing to us when
so many citizens have exchanged their civil life for a
military one and learned the strength of the tie.
12. 77 is easy Not so easy. Notice the vigour im-
. . .
parted by the use of a phrase instead of a clause and ;
the meditative historic tense in shall be animated, with

return to very plain prose in But a band of men . . .
chief.
—
The first How far the rate of wages, etc. It has been
one of the great drawbacks of an industrial system
which has made our country rich, that one of the
essentials of Production, the labour of human beings,
men and women and children —has been considered only
134 COMMENTARY
asa lump " or " chunk," from which bits might be
"
broken when wanted in an industry, and rejectea
directly it was no longer bringing gain; i.e. scrapped
like a broken tool or wheel. No one recognised it as this.
The system sounded well; freedom of labour to accept
the best price offered; freedom of industry to mab
use of cheapest labour procurable. Thus plenty of work
men unemployed was a convenient state of things fo:
employers; as it certainly was not for the workme:
themselves.
Now it is being recognised that the payment of a jus
wage shall be a "first charge" on an industry; an
that such forms of industry as cannot meet this charg
must (speaking generally) disappear.
—
The second How far . . connected. Also now (sixt
.
years after) it is generally acknowledged by writers o:

Social Science, that the stabilising of employment, th
regularising of industry should be the first endeavou
of large employers of labour, from the Government down
It is probably impossible to prevent some fiuctuatio
in demand in many trades, but the greatest and worst
have come through the speculative competition among
manufacturers and merchants to amass some sudden
gain. The step may involve the employment of fro:
fifty to some hundreds of additional workmen: when
the opportunity fails or is exhausted, most or all of
them will be as suddenly dismissed. With the recognition
of the claim of labour supplied by human beings, as
distinct from inanimate material, such violent fluctua-
tions would cease. For the same reason Government
and public authorities, such as the municipal bodies,
should seek to put in hand their large, slow-moving
schemes of building, draining, reclaiming, etc., in the
less busy seasons of the year. For this, much greater
135
unity among Government departments, and corre-
spondence between various local authorities is both
and necessary.
desirable
Permanent interest . esprit de corps. Among the pro-
.
posals of reformers of the present day for achieving

this are those of co-operation, profit-sharing, and some
part in the general responsibility and control of the firm's
working policy. Persons who have no " say in the
matter," and only mechanical duties to fulfil, are apt
to flag and deteriorate in service sooner than those who
have some responsibility or leadership.
13. Sell commissions. Sale of army commissions has
been abolished; the professional fees remain as stated;
the (Metropolitan) cab-fares have been revised on the
principle of a minimum charge, and increments per mile
or part. But the illustration holds good; knowing it to
be a fixed charge no one who is in need of the service
haggles about the price.
14. " Chosen.*' There seems to be a silent allusion

to the Gospel, " Many be called, but few chosen
(Matthew xx. 16), the basis of the doctrines of " elec-
tion " and " pre-destination." Ruskin suggests that
to be "chosen" is the outcome of some personal merit,
not the caprice of an absolute authority.
The Trades Unions have succeeded in establishing a
standard rate of pay in all the organised industries, and
is this they revive the defensive usefulness of the old
Guilds. But they do not, like them, differentiate between
the good and the bad workman uniformity rather than
;
excellence is the controlling idea. This may be partly

because of the great sub-division of processes, whereby
most kinds of work are merely repetition, at once
monotonous and deadening to the spirit. A recent
136 COMMENTARY
speaker stated, "135 different processes are employed
in the making of a boot. It is not to be expected that
any of these 135 workers can get enthusiastic about
their particular bit of the boot." This development
of mechanical work is the great justification for the
movement in favour of much shorter hours of labour;
not that the rest of the time may be spent in idleness,
but that the worker may be able to take up some piece
of work, as a recreation or a hobby, which will exercise
his personal capacity and provide an opportunity for
some experience of pride and joy in work.
19. Enforcing this upon him by political statute. A
general condemnation of Government trade regulations
and restrictions.
20. Hero of the "Excursion "from Autolycus. Words-

worth's Excursion was written in 18 14; its hero, a
pedlar in the mountain district of England, was a cen-
tury ago the chief means of communication from the
outer world to the remote glens and dales of the North ]
there he kept
In solitude and solitary thought
His mind in a just equipoise of love.
Autolycus (Shakespeare's Winter's Tale), also a pedlar,
was an attractive rogue who disguised his habitual thefts
from cottage and roost and hedge under the description
of himself as a
Snapper-up of unconsidered trifles. 1
The paragraph is a fine exposition of the right spirit

of commercial intercourse, and its closing line a para-
phrase of
Peace hath her victories no less renowned than war.
1
Winter's Tale, iv. 3.
EDITOR'S NOTES 137
22. To provide for the nation. This truth is at the
bottom of the energetic movement towards "national-
ising " the production of the prime necessaries of life, a
principal article in the Socialist creed.
In the purest and cheapest forms most beneficial
. . .
to the men employed. The first two aims have been very
satisfactorily attained by many traders during the past
sixty years, but the third has proved a hard saying.
The lot of the rank and file of workers for some of the
great firms of which the British mercantile world is
— —
proud and jealous has often been a discredit to the
" richest country in the world." The evil theories of
" free contract " and unregulated competition among
labourers, especially if unskilled, resulted in wide under-
payment and ultimately " sweating."
24. The substance of this paragraph presses home

the loss to the community involved in the practical
disappearance of apprenticeship. The excellence of that
system lay, not so much in the careful learning of a
trade (which might often be mastered in less than seven
years), but in the relation established between adult
workers and the young.
25. The long senrtence beginning For all this is true,

and ending with national destruction, will need careful
reading; it is packed full with energetic denunciation
and assertions. It brings in the idea, fully developed
later on, that real wealth consists in fullness of Life.
Premises. A term in logic; suppositions or hypotheses
on which the arguments are based.
Deduction. Conclusion or result of argument.
Polity. There is a nice distinction between polity and
policy, both signify a reasoned course of action; the
former (from which comes political) implies considera-
"
138 COMMENTARY
tions for thegood of the " body politic," the community,
the nation: the latter may be well intentioned, but is
as often dictated by expediency.
QUESTIONS AND EXERCISES

PREFACE
i. (6
1
) Give a short sketch of the school you would
like to see established on these lines, its curriculum and
time-table.
2. (6
2
) Describe any such manufactories and work-
shops, and their purpose.
THE ROOTS OF HONOUR

3. (10, note) Make the comparison suggested in
(a)
Bleak House and Master Humphrey's Clock, (b) How
would you alter the characters of Mr. Bounderby and

Stephen Blackpool (Hard Times) to make them more
telling to-day?
4. (17) What do you understand by "the romance

of trade " ? Give some illustrations.
" works " carried
5. (23) Describe one of the model
on by Captains of Industry to-day.
6. Make a collection of a score of " economic
proverbs and maxims. Discuss in a paragraph two
which apparently contradict each other.
7. Think out and describe the occupation in which
you yourself would wish to spend your working life.
Supplement this with a talk on two or three hobbies
which you would choose.
EDITOR'S NOTES 139
ESSAY II
THE VEINS OF WEALTH

Ruskin suggests in this title that the circulation of
wealth in the "body politic," the community or nation,
resembles that of the blood in the human body. We
should expect him to seek to establish in the course of
the essay some further points in the analogy, for instance,
the causes that make for healthful vigour of the body
and those that " damp down " conditions of wholesome
energy.
27. Absolute. The distinction between absolute and

relative terms is interesting: to the former belong
circular, man, fire) to the latter perpendicular, son, heat.
28. Note this definition of political economy, and
the eloquent illustration which follows.
30. Direct . . . inverse. Remember the arithmetical
meanings and formulae.
31. Harmonious results . . melodious inequalities.
.
These are felicitous epithets ; the richness of a full chord

isgot only by the blending of differences, and (as Brown-
ing reminds us), consists in more than the totality of
the notes forming it. But each must have been in itself
melodious, not noise merely. And inequalities, of fortune,
capacity and attainment are not necessarily ugly or
noisome, but only when caused by injustice or pressed
to extremes.
31, note. Reform our schools prisons. Ruskin . . .
shared the hopes and enthusiasms of the best thinkers

of his day, and inspired much of the reforming spirit
in education. But now, for the first time in our history,
140 COMMENTARY
are any considerable numbers of the population alive to
its value, keen to advance it, and prepared to honour it.
Since Ruskin wrote there have appeared
34, note.
many very interesting definitions of money and dis-
cussions on its functions. In various ages of the world
many different materials have been used for " money ";
cattle, skins, corn, salt, tea, shells, slaves and, finally,
metals. The whole subject is interesting to those who
care for the story of origins and development. Modern
economic definitions give us the following:
(i) Money is any exchangeable good which is both
a medium of exchange and a measure of value.
(2) Currency is any medium of exchange which is
current, or which circulates in any particular region
{e.g., British currency, French currency).
(3) Legal tender is any medium of exchange which

everyone must by law take in exchange: "validity
secured by legal measures" (Sect. 34).
With regard to (1) we may notice that money
might be, and once was, only a measure of value, or
counters, like the " marks " given for school exercises.
Thus a goat might be worth 500 shells and a weapon
250 shells, but the shells themselves worth nothing.
Their introduction, however, helped the calculation of
the relative values of the weapon and the goat. But if
the money itself were valuable, as cattle or cubes of tea,
it became also a medium of exchange.
(2) Currency is not quite the same thing as coinage.

The ancient Empires of Egypt, Chaldaea and Assyria
had no money, though they had immense commerce,
for their currency consisted in blocks of metal reckoned
by weight.
(3) In the British Isles the gold sovereign is legal
EDITOR'S NOTES 141
tender for any amount; so are Bank of England notes
for £5 and its multiples; silver coins are legal tender up
to £2; copper coins up to is. After 19 14 the "paper
money," Treasury notes for £1 and for 10s., super-
seded gold coins for inland trade, so that the gold
coins might be at the service of the Government during
the war.
A
man's labour for the day is a better standard of value,
etc. Some
centuries ago in England when "labour" was
almost entirely agricultural this standard was actually
in use. An old table-book contains the scale of relation,
1 rood has 10 day ewer kes, 1 day ewer ke has 4 perches.
37. Its real value . . . algebraical sign attached to it.
It will be remembered that while the signs +, — are

in arithmetic only signs of operation, capable of altering
quantity, in Algebra they are signs of kind, or capable
of changing quality; so that the same operation may
bring a widely different result. Add + x to + x, and we
have -\-2x. But add - x to +x and we have o.
38. Dura Plains. See Daniel hi. 1.
Gilded index. Index may
be used here instead of
indicator —
attractively presented and thus misleading:
" All that glitters is not gold." Or it may be used in
the mathematical sense, as the exponent of the " power "
of the quantity.
Purchase-pieces of potter's fields. The price given to
Judas, the betrayer of Christ. St. — Matthew xxvii. 6, 7.
An available principle,
etc. Readers caring to pursue
this line of thought further will find much of interest
in the opening chapter of Philip Wicksteed's Common
Sense of Political Economy.
The great question of justice, etc. Ruskin always uses
the term justice in its very fullest meaning; not in the
142 COMMENTARY
narrower sense of judging wrong-doers. So do all
writers on economics who maintain that the science is
a part of Ethics, i.e. concerned with the idea / ought.
39. These points are being forcibly illustrated to-
day. The "unrest" throughout civilised societies is not
solely on account of the desire for riches as for that
intangible wealth which results from the right relations
of human beings with one another.
40. Byzants. Or besants, an Eastern coin which

preceded the noble.
Outcome and consummation of all wealth. Though
. . .
even a heathen philosopher declared that " it is not houses

or colonnades or market-places that make a city, but
men," and Christian civilisation is based on the dignity
of human life, these canons have been largely forgotten
or ignored in the modern theories of national progress.
41. Adamant of Golconda. A reference to the famous
diamond mines of Hindustan.
A damant. Old word, from which diamond comes.
" These are My
Jewels." The proud utterance of
Cornelia, the mother of the twin Gracchi, Roman
patriots, pointing to her sons.

THE VEINS OF WEALTH
I. (28) (a) Suggest three more examples which you

yourself could supply, (b) What characters in fiction
do you remember who were (1) models or (2) warnings
in any of these or similar ways ?
EDITOR'S NOTES 143
2. (33-35) Compose another story on the lines of
this to illustrate the same truth.
3. (36) Suggest some groups of Three Trades to
represent the three men in this illustration. Let one,
at least, of your groups bring in foreign trade.
4. (39) Suggest some of these

" joys " and give
;
actual illustrations of the " fidelities " which cannot be

bought for, or rewarded by, gold.
5. (40) What actual plans and proposals do you know

of which are intended to remedy the " dim-eyed and
"
narrow-chested state of being ?
6. (41) What do you understand by " Souls of a good
quality " ?
7. Describe your ideal " Life of a Happy Worker."
ESSAY III
In this essay Ruskin gets into close quarters with

the conflict in principle of considerations of justness,
and the bald teachings of the current political economy.
42. Left among his ledgers some general maxims con-
cerning wealth. Any one of the anonymous authors of
the collection of moral sayings handed down to us in
the so-called Proverbs of Solomon.
43. The sad irony of this paragraph becomes intensi-
fied throughout this essay and the following one.
a beautiful exposition of the true principles

44. This is
of commercial intercourse, whence emerges the con-
sciousness of brotherhood, not rivalry and hatred.
144 COMMENTARY
Sun of Justice. Ruskin employs the Vulgate transla-
tion. The Authorised Version of the English Bible
throughout substitutes " righteousness," which is thus
familiar (and rather vague in its meaning) to most
readers.
Every other means, emollient or consolatory except
. . .
justice. The watchword of impatient workers is a rough

rendering of this: "We want Justice not Charity."
44, note. This very full and clear note is worth careful
study.
46. Which prudence is of no mean order. Prudence is

ranked by theologians among the four Cardinal (or
chief) Virtues; and in its high Christian sense it guides
and illuminates. But in common usage its meaning
has deteriorated, and generous minds are often disposed
to scorn its precepts. Ruskin seeks to restore its original
force and brings forward its historical and Catholic
.associations.
Represented by Dante, etc. The Divine Comedy,
Paradiso, xviii., xix.
47. As much justice as we need for all practical use.

Cf.
" Whoso doeth the will of God, he shall know of the
doctrine."
47, note. Again the symbolic statements of Algebra
are employed to make clear the argument. Written out
in full it would stand:
Value = labour x force of demand; i.e. a product. ,
48. The
considerations in this paragraph, if mastered
and appreciated, will help us to see through the mean
attractions of "a bargain." It is first ignorance, and next
selfishness, that bolster up the seductiveness of specula-
tive dealings on the Stock Exchange and Summer sales.
EDITOR'S NOTES 145
49, note. The qualities of character which render science
possible. Development of intelligence so that theory can
be blended with practice and the knowledge of principles
;
underlying the details of work. This makes all forms of

work more interesting and generally more valuable than
mere rule-of-thumb execution.
49. Empirical . analytical. The one implies rough
. .
estimate by actual practice (cf. " pinch of salt " in

amateur cookery); the other the testing by breaking
up into component parts and weighing or measuring
them.
50. This paragraph is a clear exposition of the fallacy
contained in the proverb, " Half a loaf is better than
no bread," if taken as an economic principle.
52. Tendency of the system is to check advancement.
This is plainly given by labour leaders to-day as one of
the conditions against which workers rebel. Also it is
artificial, and there are quite enough natural and in-
evitable checks among the more tolerable " disabilities
of poverty."
53, note.The question of Free Trade or Protection is

stilla knotty one. With a world at peace it seems that
the producing of goods where they are most readily and
conveniently grown or made is only in due accordance
with the principle of the division of labour. For farmers
or fruit-growers to claim subsidies from Government in
order to cultivate the lower slopes of Skiddaw or the
Cornish dunes for wheat or tomatoes would obviously
be absurd. Yet the wholesale adoption of the theory
of " most conveniently grown or made " during the past
fifty years had in 19 14 resulted in Britain having lost
some of her most important industries to more enter-
— :
146 COMMENTARY
prising nations; and among them some essential or
" key " manufactures. every responsible mem-
For this,
ber of the community who had practised the gospel of
" cheapness " was partly to blame; since this is the final
and supreme test of "greatest ease and convenience
of production." The Great War has forced upon the
British nation the recognition that cheap bread does not
compensate for a depleted rural population; nor cheap
fabrics for the perishing of small industries. Those
interested in this question may like to read Industry
and Commerce, by Cunningham, as well as the chapters
on the subject in the ordinary text-books. A via media
of the present day is the idea of Imperial Preference or
Free Trade within the British Empire.
53. Yet, to be just, etc. Pope's Moral Essays, Epistle
III., to Allen, Lord Bathurst.
54. Collateral . . . reversionary. A collateral operation
may be said to be one which goes on simultaneously,
or side by side with another; reversionary or comple-
mentary operations those which take place when the
original ones cease.
54, note. Here Ruskin lets himself go to the extent

of poking fun at the pompous supporters of " things
as they are."
Soldiers of the Ploughshare as well as Soldiers of the
Sword. In his collected papers, A Joy for Ever.
55. The writings which we (verbally) esteem . . . mammon
service. See I. Timothy vi. 10, and St. Matthew vi. 24.
Tai . . . inope. Dante, Paradiso, xix. 109 (cf. St.
Matthew xii. 41).
Christians like these the JEthiop shall condemn

When that the two assemblages shall part;
One rich eternally, the other poor. Gary's Trans.
EDITOR'S NOTES 147

1. (43) Write two short paragraphs as opening
speeches in a debate, one supporting, the other opposing
the statement: "We are taken in by lying labels, titles
and advertisements, because we are too. idle to learn
what we ought to know."
2. (45) Give some historical and geographical in-
stances to illustrate this.
3. (46) What is the difference between legal and
fust ? And between justice and equity ?
4. (53, note) Write a paragraph on (1) Import Duties;
(2) Customs Houses; (3) Smuggling.
5- (53) Give a prose version of the quotation from

Pope.
6. (54) Collect some literary allusions to the " Plough-
share and the Sword," and the " Pen and the Sword."
Of what are these implements the emblems ?
7. What drawbacks do you recognise in the lot of a
millionaire ?
ESSAY IV
AD VALOREM
Here is the" summing
up of the whole argument. The
that Value, that curse of economic theory,
title indicates
is the leading idea; and that its meaning is complex.
The subjective capacity contributes as much as the
objective material; in Ruskin's words, " it must be not
148 COMMENTARY
only of an availing nature, but in availing hands." In
the course of the essay he derides the misconceptions
as to what constitutes value, and therefore wealth,
which had disfigured economic theory and. misled
economic practice, from Adam Smith's days to his own.
56. Ambiguous. Open to two or more interpretations;
56-57. The substance of these paragraphs is rather
technical, and may need reading twice. The early econo-
mists worked for a clear distinction between produc-
tive and unproductive labourers; for example, those
employed on producing a marketable commodity of
indisputable utility and necessity, as saucepans, basins ;
and those producing articles of ornament or luxury,

as necklaces, vases. They recognised also a still less
"productive" labourer; the attendant or servant em-
ployed by the rich for ostentation or the performance
of trivial personal services. But though the distinction
is possible in clearly marked cases, as in cultivation
of the land on the one hand, and a liveried footman on

the other, there is a very wide area, and by no means
a straight line, dividing the two. Under some circum-
stances agricultural labour might be " unproductive,"
if thriftlessly or unintelligently applied; and in some
cases, equally, personal attendants may be giving "pro-
ductive " services if they relieve the employer of petty
distractions and set him free for valuable duties, public
or private.
59. Many of Mill's definitions are faulty and thus, as
in the case of value, they lay him open to the rather
merciless reductio ad absurdum of this paragraph. But
definitions, whether literary or scientific, are not easy to
construct. A modern accepted economic definition of
value is "The capacity of any good to be estimated as
—
EDITOR'S NOTES 149
desirable," and though faultless, it is too much of an
abstraction to be enjoyed by ordinary readers.
Shakespeare realised the difficulty of the subject, and
gives us
What things there are
Most abject in regard and dear in use:
What things again most dear in the esteem
And poor in worth 1 !
A pot of the smallest ale A donis painted by a running

. . .
brook. Enumerated in the tricking of Christopher Sly.

Induction to the Taming of the Shrew.
Demos, in the shape of Christopher Sly. Demos,
personification of the people, or of popular opinion;
Christopher Sly, the tinker in the Induction to the
Taming of the Shrew.
Notice the skilful syllogism.
60. David Ricardo, like Mill, was a highly-esteemed

writer on political economy, best known for his Theory
of Rent. The demolition of Ms position is undertaken
in a less serious vein, and is quite comical.
60, note. The algebraical statement here is beautifully
neat:
Let y represent demand, and x represent quantity of
labour.
Then when y is constant, xy oc x.
But we are reminded that demand never is constant
when quantity of labour is not, or there would be no
such things as scarcity and monopoly.
60, note. The force of the buyer's capable intention
to buy. Ruskin's clear-headed blame led economists
to adopt the truer expression " effective demand." The
word " demand " is a good example of the difference
1
Troilus and Cressida, iii. 3.
150 COMMENTARY
of meaning which a term may have in its technical and
in its ordinary sense.
61. This paragraph is delightful to lovers of words.
The deterioration and drift from true expression which
results from common and careless use of words is per-
petually illustrated when we need them in some weighty
matter. It closes with a magnificent peroration, ending
a sentence of twenty- two lines. Ruskin's energy and
fervour permit him sometimes to achieve wonderful
structures. It would be an interesting exercise to write
out the principal line of thought with all illustrations
and parentheses stripped off, and see what is lost.
62, note. The Church Porch, George Herbert:
Yet thy thriving still misdoubt some evil
in
Lest gaining gain on thee, and make thee dim
To all things else. Wealth is the conjuror's devil;
Whom when he thinks he hath, the devil hath him.
Gold thou mayst safely touch; but if it stick
Unto thy hands, it woundeth to the quick.
65. Sure, etc. Pope's Essay on Man. The generous
disposition has often in it an element of recklessness
which leads its possessor to act upon impulse rather
than calculation.
Persons who become rich, etc. These two groups of
epithets are worth considering. The first shows that
several characteristics conducive to getting rich are
anything but admirable; the second, that not all those
which conduce to poverty are despicable.
an example of Ruskin's scorching scrutiny.
66. This is
The term " profit " at which he is tilting, has of late
years been termed " increment " (meaning addition),
and the complexities of modern business relations have
also given us " unearned increment," implying " un-
earned by the party receiving the addition."
EDITOR'S NOTES 151
The plus Here Ruskin uses the alge-
quantities, etc.
braical meaning of the symbols. Since
(qualitative)
i860 "plus-es" and "minus-es" have become familiar
expressions.
A kind of red ink. A grim euphemism for blood.
67. Catallactics. Economics, like most sciences, has

a large array of uncouth terms. This one, used by
Archbishop Whateley (1831) in a lecture on the Science
of Exchange, fortunately never became incorporated in
the vocabulary.
A needle for a diamond. It is instructive to recognise
that much of British industrial wealth is founded on the
commercial intercourse established with primitive
peoples. A gay cotton handkerchief or a string of glass
beads exchanged for a load of cocoa-nuts, or a bundle
of plumage would tend to " enrich " one party to the
transaction.
Founded on In its original use science
nescience, etc.
signified knowledge, a body of systematised know-

later,
ledge, and, later still, the collection of principles under-
lying one branch of one department of knowledge.
From science (scio, I know) come its derivatives pre-
science, or knowing beforehand, and nescience, not
knowing.
Artlessness. The word here has not the commendatory
sense as when applied to a child's outlook, but to the
absence of art where it is needed.
Fish .serpent. St. Matthew
. . vii. 10.
68. Merchant. From merces, payment; hence mer-

cantile.
As a nail, etc. Ecclesiaticus xxvii. 2.
Zechariah's roll. Zech. v. 1. Septuagint, "flying
sickle."
152 COMMENTARY
69. Metaphysical and psychical problem, In meta-
physics is studied the order of things outside nature:
in psychics the order of things of the soul.
David counting the price. II. Samuel xxiii. 15, 16.
Four variable quantities. For a price to be arrived at
we must have an equation; A x B = a x ft, and as
each of the four varies, any variation in one of the
quantities must be corrected, or balanced, by variation
in others.
70. note. This charming note gives us a taste of

Ruskin's and delight in elucidating the old myths,
skill
more fully displayed in his Queen of the Air (1869).
71. Here we have a glance at the principles underlying
the theory of Rent; one of the most thorny subjects
in economics.
Cheap. From the old term for market; whence
Cheapside, Eastcheap, etc. This deep comparison makes
us look foolish, but we continue to say " human effort
is cheap," with some bitterness perhaps.
72. Nugatory. Making of no effect.

Negative side positive side.
. . . Another mathe-
matical illustration, taken from Analytical Conies in
Ruskin's day, but familiar to most of us now in the
" Graphs " of elementary Algebra.
Wife is . the vine, etc.
. . Ps. exxviii. 3.
Consumption absolute is the end, crown, and perfection
of production. To Ruskin's clear sight is owing the much
later recognition of this truth by economists.
73. Caput vivum, not caput mortuum. An illustration
borrowed from chemistry. Caput mortuum is the
residuum when the volatile matter is released. Through-
out, Ruskin is considering Capital in its full, true
meaning, not in the narrow technical sense in which it
—
EDITOR'S NOTES 153
is used in economics. There it means "Wealth devoted
to the production of further wealth"; and it is, of
course, of various forms. It is also correctly described
as the " result of saving."
Root producing issuing in bulb. This time
root, bulb
an illustration from Botany
(the science) or horticulture
(the art) of the cultivation of plants. Perhaps we may
see in this paragraph a dignified presentation of the
ugly pursuit known as " money-grubbing."
Prince Rupert's drops. Molten glass dropped inta
cold water. A
chemical experiment devised by Prince
Rupert, grandson of James I.
A polypous manner. A
polypus is a growth of a fun-
goid nature, never beneficial to the organism upon which
it feeds.
The succeeding lines are an eloquent tribute to the
joy of work, as realised in the great primal occupations
of husbandry.
Anadvance from Tisiphone, on mortgage (Tisiphone,
p. 105, note). " The requiter " will exact the repayment
of the loan at the borrower's death, a mortgage being
the first charge on the estate of the dead borrower.
74. The type of Ixion. In the myth

Ixion promised
his father-in-law to give him the value
of the bridal
gifts he owed, but treacherously murdered him. Purified
of his sin by Zeus, he again sought to eschew his debt
of gratitude, and to win Hera from Zeus. Zeus = Jupiter,
Hera = Juno.
This paragraph is a triumphant example of packed
eloquence, the line of narrative bearing a luxuriant
series of —
branches simile, illustration, and allusion
in a sentence of nearly thirty lines.
Demas' silver mine. Another myth of covetousness.
154 COMMENTARY
Juno.The Queen of Heaven in the Greek mythology.
Centaurs. Powerful monsters, half man, half horse.
Dante's Geryon. Divine Comedy, Inferno, xvii. 105.
The strange monster which bore Dante and Virgil from
the Seventh to the Eighth Circle, the " lowest hell/'
the "uncleanly image of Fraud. His face was the
. . .
face of a just man, so mild an aspect had it outwardly;

and the rest was all a reptile's body." (Wicksteed's
trans.)
The Ezekiel vision. Ezekiel i. 15, 16.
The dictum of Mill that " a demand for com-
76.
modities is not a demand for labour " is another example
of infelicitous expression of a partial truth incurring
rejection of it altogether. Later writers have hammered
at it until it is not allowed to stand without innumerable
qualifications, and the more easy to perceive its
it is
faultiness since the conditions of the modern world are
widely different from those when Mill and Ruskin wrote.
Not an iron filing. Here is a stimulating novelty in
place of the ancient "jot or tittle," or the threadbare
" scrap " or the classical " iota."
77. How much life it produces. Here we have the real

kernel of the truth Ruskin is laying down throughout
the whole treatise: " There is no Wealth but Life."
79. Claim your crumbs . . . right to be holy, perfect,
pure. The demand of labour to-day for better conditions
of life, though obscured to the general gaze by the
violence or material greed of a noisy few, is marked by*
a real appreciation of the things that make for Life.
Could Ruskin have seen it before he sank beneath
a consciousness of failure, it would have rejoiced his
heart.
80. Natural rate of wages. Ricardo's slack definition
EDITOR'S NOTES 155
makes him an easy victim; certainly the alternatives
of " greater number " or " happier number " did not
embarrass the economists of his day.
Properties of cones and the sizes of stars. Branches
of mathematics: Conic Sections and Astronomy.
A
trenchant little sketch of human progress from
primitive patriarchal conditions, through the prophet-
leader period, to the warrior-king state, with its separate
provision of religious teachers.
82. Search for felicity as well as for food. This assertion

iswell borne out in the present day when merely material
good is found to be quite inadequate to satisfy the dis-
inherited.
See Proverbs viii. 31, and xv. 30.
All lovely things are also necessary. This is a leading
idea in Ruskin's thought. He has no patience with
useless ornament, and sees, in the wonderful provision
of natural beauty on the earth, the satisfaction of a part
of man which cannot be sustained by bread — that is, by
material fullness.
83. What is chiefly needed. This is a needful reminder

in our present energetic schemes for social betterment.
There is peril that we may demand too much of
" Government," or organisation of some kind, and
neglect to contribute enough of personal, individual
amendment.
The simple life, the " plain living and high thinking "
of Wordsworth, is indicated as the happy via media.
Justice and peace. Vulgate rendering, Psalm lxxxv. 13.
Them that make peace. St. James iii. 18.
" Business " is now quite differentiated from "busy-
ness," as "holiday" from "holy-day": yet both are
essentially the same and equally opposed to serenity.
156 COMMENTARY
To make much of. To esteem, to treat with care.
84.
These four considerations duly observed would have
•made unnecessary Food Control and a Food Ministry,
and " profiteering " a meaningless term.
oo-ov kv, k.t.A. Hesiod's Works and Days, 40-41.
Compare:
Fools! they know not how much the half exceeds the whole,
nor how great blessing lies in marrow and asphodel. Aristophanes.
85. This closing paragraph has a singular appro-

priateness just now. The cruelties of war have sickened
—
us; its rage of destruction impoverished us materially;
yet the prolonged strife has awakened a sleeping readi-
ness to snatch advantages. The generosity and fortitude
which withheld no sacrifice to preserve us from defeat
must not be wanting in the subtler perils of conquest.
Bearing precious seed. Psalm cxxvi. 6.
Unto this last as unto thee. St. Matthew xx. 13, 14.
Wicked weary. Job iii. 17.
. . .

AD VALOREM
i.
(56) Suggest some circumstances and conditions
inwhich the following would not be wealth: (1) a £$>
Bank of England note. (2) A gold sovereign. (3) A fur
coat. (4) A motor-car.
2. How do (1) the possession of jewels, (2)
(61)
the wearing of fine clothes, (3) the visiting of picture
theatres, (4) belonging to a football or chess club,
(5) attending a firework display, —
avail towards life?
EDITOR'S NOTES 157
3. Give a brief account of some of the great
(66)
constructions or discoveries during the past hundred
years which have brought about material gain or profit.
4. (70) Memorise the first paragraph. Can you name
some splendid conquests ?
5. (73) What is the point of the question: "Where
are your furrows " ?
6. (81) State briefly some of the minuses to set off

against the pluses of an industrialised England.
7. (83) (a) What movements can you name which at

the present time seem to encourage simplicity and
sincerity of life ? (b) What ideas or conditions are against
them?
THE AUTHOR'S LIFE 159
BRIEF SKETCH OF THE AUTHOR'S LIFE
John Ruskin was born on 8th February, 1819, at

54, Hunter Street, Brunswick Square, London. His
father was a Scottish wine merchant, a man of char-
acter and refinement, whose example undoubtedly
inspired his conception of a true merchant as truly as
that of George Eliot's father accounts for her Caleb
Garth and Adam Bede. His mother, a most devout
Evangelical Christian, while sharing and exhibiting
to the full the limitations of early nineteenth-century
womanhood, shone in all the narrow excellences of
the home-life of the time. The first quarter of the
past century saw only the dawn of the coming
emancipation of childhood from the ponderous re-
strictions of adult ideas. Boys and girls of the
period had no actual, but only potential, use or
beauty. One day they would become men and
women ; their dress, behaviour and outlook were de-
signed to anticipate this future by imitation, and all
peculiarly child-like characteristics were as far as
possible suppressed or concealed. It is a perpetual
mystery to the psychologist of to-day that from this
system of rearing there emerged a host of shining
personalities, which our present enlightened methods
will be hard put to it to surpass.
In accordance, then, with the prevailing ideas,
little John Ruskin learnt the meaning of discipline
3:60 COMMENTARY
from babyhood. Crying was of no avail; it was not
permitted. John Wesley's mother, we are told, per-
mitted it in her larger brood, but they must "cry
quietly." Mrs. Ruskin, with her one boy, made no
concession. Small faults were swiftly punished, lapses
"
and misdemeanours carried penalties of "no fruit
•or " no pudding." John's toys were odd household
fragments, invested by his imagination with all kinds
*©f mysterious qualities and habitudes. He would
Me «on his stomach examining a square foot of the
dining-room carpet until it had yielded up to him
its secrets of colour and texture and blend, of which
he was to make such wonderful use in years to come.

Serious offences of course involved whipping, which,
we may be quite willing to think, hurt his gentle
mother as much as it hurt him. Self-control and self-
possession, which he justly valued and extolled in

later life, were early taught by the coercive suggestion
of saving his helping of pudding or favourite cake
for a less fortunate child, and his tiny instalments of
pocket-money for the missionary-box.
He early learnt to read and apparently (as it
seems was often the case before there was so much
teaching) without difficulty. Before this his mother
was accustomed to read to him, almost entirely from
the Bible; when he had mastered the art they read
it aloud in alternate verses. Not the " story " parts
only, but from cover to cover; Genesis to Malachi
and St. Matthew to Revelation. And the unfor-
tunate verse-and-chapter divisions of "the worst-
printed book in the world/' did not prevent the
majesty and music of the English Authorised version
from sinking into the boyish mind, and stirring the
youthful heart, and colouring the child's imagination
so that always his thought bore the impress of
its nobility, and his language the fullness of its
diction.
Later he read (and we may be sure learnt) Scott
and Byron and Rogers, Young and Campbell, and
made acquaintance with the solid prose of the period.
For a short time he went to a day-school and then
read with a private tutor. At the age of seventeen
he entered Christ Church, Oxford, and won the New-
digate prize in 1839, with other University honours.
He continued to live at home in the vacations
and, as in his boyhood, went with his parents on
their yearly journeys, in which his father combined
his business with the pleasure. The}^ travelled in a
specially-fitted post-chaise and thus, in leisurely
fashion, Ruskin saw the greater part of the British
Isles and the tourist's Continent. And all the time
he was observing and reflecting. Perhaps it was as
well that he had not had toys to distract him, for,
like R. L. Stevenson, he was never " bored," and his
gift for seeing, and his habits of reflection, together
resulted in a sense of relation which hasty scholars
invariably lack.
Ruskin had very early practised the art of self-
and he also
expression, writing verse in the nursery;
mastered the brush, the knife and the chisel. So
L
162 COMMENTARY
that one of his biographers very justly points out,
" his first-hand knowledge or arts and crafts gave
him real insight into the finer qualities of work."
His friendship with Turner, and his interest in the
painter's work and method, filled a large space in his
life as a young man. At the age of twenty-four he
brought out the first volume of Modem Painters,
which was followed at irregular intervals by four more
volumes, the last appearing in i860. During these
years he also wrote The Stones of Venice, in three
volumes, and the Seven Lamps of Architecture with
his own illustrations.
Then- he began to be in request as a lecturer at
various places from the Royal Institution to the
Working Men's College, and from Eton and Woolwich
to private schools for girls. And however much his
subject might deal with art, his real theme was ever
the Art of Life. His dismay at the growing ugliness
of industrial England, and his desire to help workers
to emerge from their sordid conditions, led him to
help the social reformers Maurice and Kingsley in
their efforts. The Working Men's College was the
result of their labour and, later, he founded the
St. George's Guild. Out of his dissatisfaction had
come Unto and its sequel, Munera Pulveris,
this Last,
both equally unacceptable to mid- Victorian Eng-
land, with numerous other utterances condemning
the economic theories and system of the day.
In 1870 he was appointed to the Slade Professorship
of Art at Oxford, and many of his lectures there are
collected in thevolumes with curious titles which
appear among his works. His art work brought him
a good income, and " finding himself rich he piously
and prudently began to grow poor again for the sake
of the poor; giving one-tenth of his fortune, for
instance, for the buying of land for them." The
members Guild did the same, its object
of St. George's
being a two-fold one of protesting in a practical way
against the mercantile spirit and " to succour child-
hood and educate it," thus conserving and treasuring
the true wealth of the nation. He had a real love
for young people and children, and thought no
trouble too great if perchance he could interest and
amuse them. His book Ethics of the Dust consists
of Talks to little Schoolgirls about what he terms
" familiar minerals," which he gave at a school in
the country so that these pupils at least " might have
a vital interest in the subject when they began to
study it as science." He says quite plainly that
" no science can be learned in play," but play may
oftenmake intelligent children desire to work.
The John Ruskin School at Camberwell and the
May-Day and other celebrations at Whitelands
College, Chelsea, are memorials of this affection of his.
Indeed, in all the matters on which he felt strongly,
Ruskin endeavoured to practise his own theories.
Some of these attempts brought upon him the open
ridicule of thoughtless or disapproving people ; some
appeal to the very persons he wanted to help.
failed to
Thus, a shop he opened at Paddington in a poor
164 COMMENTARY
neighbourhood where tea was sold as cheaply in small
quantities to the small customers as if they had been
able to buy a large amount at one time, was very
partially successful because the people preferred
the kind of shop they were used to. And when, as
Slade Professor at Oxford, he led a band of enthusi-
astic undergraduates to mend a road near the city,
the faulty result was laughed at, not always good-
naturedly.
Ruskin was not happy in his marriage and had no
children of his own, but lived a rather lonely life after
he set up his own house. His mother lived to the
age of ninety, and her son revered her in remembrance
as he had loved her in life. From 1872 onwards, till
his death in 1900, he lived at Coniston, the latter years
in almost complete retirement. The village library,
the linen and metal industries at Keswick, the Lang-
dale hand-weaving, are all mementoes of his pioneer
work in a direction which the twentieth-century mind
supports more fully than did the preceding the —
endeavour to restore to the worker his craft, and with
it his share in the joy and pride of good work.
A more imposing commemoration of his thought

and labour exists in the foundation of Ruskin College
at Oxford, where working men may study the
principles of civic duty and responsibility.
John Ruskin has been described by a distinguished
essayist 1 as " one of the greatest of great men of all
ages," and it remains for the present generation
1
Mrs. Meynell, John Ruskin (" Modern English Writers ").
to recognise this. In his own modest sincerity he laid
claim only to being "not an unjust person; not an
unkind one; a lover of order, labour, and peace."
He lies buried in Coniston churchyard, a runic
cross marking his grave, amid the beautiful scenery
of one of the fairest districts in his beloved England.
RUSKIN AS ECONOMIST 167
RUSKIN AS AN ECONOMIST
Most treatises which aim at giving instruction on
subjects of study begin with a quiet statement of
what is intended, or a definition of the title. In Unto
this Last Ruskin has a much more lively opening.

He clears the way for the developing of his theme by
attacking the prevailing notions and the methods of
teaching political economy. He was writing in i860,
and the modern outlook of economics owes much to
him for its emancipation from the theory of the
classical economists, otherwise known as the " Man-
chester School," or the laissez-faire-ists. But, as
he reminds the reader in his preface, his ideas met
with a very discouraging reception, and occasioned
an outburst of angry denunciation. Very slowly
indeed did his interpretations of economic facts and
conditions win their way though looking back over
;
the teachings of the intervening years we see how

they helped to leaven the dense mass.
The term " economy " as used here, denotes system
or management (" House-law," Preface, Sect. 3) and
has no necessary connection with thrift. But it implies
right ordering and judicious control. With the adjec-
tive "political" preceding it, the phrase signifies the
right ordering of the affairs of the community, or
nation, the " body politic " of the old writers. But
168 COMMENTARY
since the words politics, political, and polity have
become almost appropriated to state government,
and narrowed to express the methods by which this
is carried on the wider meaning of " concerning the
whole community " has been lost.

Hence the subject-matter of the book, and of those
which its writer attacks, is now generally known as
economics. It is a science because it is a body of
knowledge based upon certain principles or laws.
It is not, however, one of the exact sciences like
mathematics, or even like chemistry, because there
"
always enters into its considerations the " inconstant
elements of human desires, feelings and motives.
In academic classification it ranks as a moral science,
belonging to a group distinct from the natural
sciences; and is a part of moral philosophy or ethics.
Ethics is concerned with conduct, the comprehension
of the idea I ought, and economics belongs to that part
of the study of human actions in society; that is, in
the ordinary business of life, getting a living.
The practical side of economics shows us that it
is also an art; or rather, as has been aptly said,
" social science, or civics, is the art of economics."
We are reminded of arithmetic, which is both being
;
the "science of number," and the " art of calculation."

When Ruskin wrote, however, applied economics
was understood almost solely as the art of getting
rich; and was so devoid of inspiration that some
one called it the " dismal science " and the name
stuck; in its modern development it might well be
grouped in the Scientice Humaniores if there were
such a classification.
The monumental work of Adam Smith, which
appeared in 1785, discussed and rightly explained
of the causes of the "
1
many Wealth of Nations,'
as evident in the Britain of his day. In preceding
ages industry and trade had suffered from overmuch
regulation and interference by monarchs and govern-
ments, and had not developed, through too close
an adherence to custom or usage. But in the period
1760-85 were laid the foundations of the modern
system of industry. Then took place those improve-
ments in mining and iron-smelting that development
;
of land and water transport and the device of apply-

;
ing power to machines, which together brought about

greater changes in the face of the country and in
the lives of the people than had taken place through
all the centuries since the Conquest.
At the same time there was, through the opening-
up of markets in the East and in the New World,
a great expansion of trade among unsophisticated
populations who had not hitherto been much in
contact with the products of Europe. Thus began
those major industries of cotton-spinning and calico-
printing, of making metal and hardware objects and
utensils, and of pottery and glass and the many minor
or accessory trades, with whose growth and develop-
ment are connected the great centres of industrial
life, Manchester, Bradford, Birmingham, Sheffield,
and the Staffordshire Five-Towns.

170 COMMENTARY
It is true that, through the increased wealth of
the country, England was able to win through the
Napoleonic wars which had ruined most of the
continental countries; and equally true that the
possession of this wealth did not conduce to the well-
being of the bulk of the people. But this was a much
later discovery.
It seemed to Adam Smith and his successors,
down to i860 and even later, that men's energy and
intelligence would be sure to be well employed if
they followed the dictates of self-interest and enjoyed
economic freedom. The resulting competition would
be a sufficient regulating influence, and the action
of the forces of supply and demand would result
in a sort of equilibrium, where would be found
"natural " price; the seller being determined to sell
in the dearest market and the buyer to buy in the
cheapest.
Long before Ruskin wrote, the great change in
the methods of production, which is known as the
Industrial Revolution, was complete. Village indus-
tries had migrated to towns factory production had
;
superseded home-work; machines had replaced the

human hand; the centres of the great manufactures
had become thickly-populated towns and the hastily-
;
built streets of houses designed to shelter the workers

who thronged thither had already become the
*
slums " of which we are ashamed. Hence he con-
tended that, since the working out of the economic
theory had far from resulted in the general good,
"
the principles deserved to be called " mercantile
rather than " political " economy-
As a result of this wide difference he seeks to give
a truer definition of Wealth than had hitherto been
attempted by economists, and arrives at it in his
fourth discussion, " Ad Valorem," the three preceding
essays leading up to it.
There is much that is interesting to lovers of words

in the word " wealth," its origin, build, growth,
and equivalents. In structure it resembles " health " ;
and we still have, in infrequent use, the word " weal "
from which it comes. So also we have the two forms
"Commonweal" and "Commonwealth," the latter the
more familiar of the two. The true original meaning
of " wealth " was undoubtedly " well-being," the
condition of being well, as that of " health " was the
condition of being healed or whole. The latter word,
we notice, has become almost colourless, and we
speak of " good " and " ill " and " poor " and
" robust " health. "
On the other hand, " wealth
has become more positive, and narrowed in signifi-
cance to mean material wealth. An equivalent term
was " goods," simply the plural of " good," and
covered spiritual as well as material things, as sight,
capacity, happiness; but the present meaning of
"goods" is almost solely material and, indeed,
implies heavy or bulky substance.
In economics, as in all sciences, there is a special
terminology, gritty and repellent at first, but full
of interest and meaning on further acquaintance.
172 COMMENTARY
Words used in ordinary speech have certain limited
and technical meanings, hence definitions have to be
carefully framed and adhered to. We remember the
same peculiarity appears in arithmetic, where simple
words like " common," " proper," " vulgar " and
" practice," have meanings quite different from their
everyday significations.
The following are two of the accepted current
definitions of wealth
" Wealth consists of all desirable things which
are transferable " and " Wealth consists of all those
;
things which satisfy human wants and have an

exchange value."
Thus, in its economic sense, wealth is not simply
" goods " to be technically classed as wealth things
;
must {a) and (b) be able to be exchanged

satisfy wants,
forsomething else, that is, bought and sold. So that
though air and sunshine are indispensable to life,
and affection, and capacity for enjoying literature,
music, or exercise of skill, are indeed " goods " to
their possessors, they are not economic wealth because
they cannot be " exchanged." Ruskin's own definition
is evolved only after carefully determining the mean-
ings of " having " and of " useful " ("Ad Valorem,"
Sect. 64). He describes the science of wealth as
at once the science of accumulation and the science
of distribution and shows that accumulation is
;
not always possession, and that distribution is not

scattering, but discriminating allotment, "the right
thing to the right man." It may be added that the
—
above suffice to meet his
definitions of wealth given
posers of the drowned passenger with the belt of
gold about him, and the body of St. Carlo Borromeo
(" Ad Valorem," Sect. 62).
To the remark the economist that "to be
of
wealthy is to have a large stock of useful articles/'
Ruskin would add "which we can use": the can
is more important than the have; that is, capacity
is as essential an element in wealth as materials or
rights. Hence he deduces his own definition, which

we can appreciate best after carefully mastering the
steps by which it is reached: "Wealth is the pos-
session of the valuable by the valiant." He here uses
the term " valiant " where the word " virtuous " is
more familiar, following the old translation of the
Vulgate cf. Proverbs xxxi. i.: "Who can find a
virtuous woman?" (Authorised Version); "Who
can find a valiant woman? " (Douai Version from
Vulgate).
There is no question, therefore, that to Ruskin,
political economy is a moral science most intimately
;
concerned with the mind and will of man, and not

an investigation of the action of blind forces, demand
and supply, competition, iron laws and irresistible
tendencies. " Political economy," he says, " must
be a science respecting human capacities and dis-
positions."
Until Ruskin' s passionate appeal won a hearing, and
to some extent leavened the practical application of
economic laws (or consequences), writers on political
174 COMMENTARY
economy had sought to be cold observers ard metho-
dical recorders of the actions of man in the ordinary
business of life and to divest their treatment of any
;
moral or ethical considerations. With their frosty

abstraction " economic man," they desired the intru-
sion and interference of as few disturbing elements,
such as human feelings, as possible, and aimed at as
detached and unimpassioned reasoning as in a propo-
sition in geometry. They bequeathed to their succes-
sors some remnants of this method, as is seen in the
phraseology of academic studies in political and social
economy; the substitution of the cautious " tends to
bring about," or " tends to increase," and that potent
qualification, the convenient enclosure for straying
particulars (or pound as it has been derisively called),
ceteris paribus, " other things being equal."

We know how dull history can become when it
consists only of " movements " and " tendencies,"
and even geography in its old form of measurements,
with the human agent and the humane outlook
ignored. And as economics is, in itself, a more abstract
study than any other in which man is a part, it is no
wonder that ordinary people found it uninteresting,
dull, and even " dismal." Until the spark of Ruskin's
fervour had kindled something like a living flame,
its exponents had treated it almost as though its
principles acted in a vacuum.

There are still various " schools " of economists,
and the disagreements between their representatives
have " tended " still further to repel the general
;

reader. But the progressive humanisation of its
treatment, and the growing rejection of " political
economy without a conscience," have led to the in-
corporation of economics as a part of social science,
or civics, with which every intelligent citizen is inti-
mately concerned and of which he cannot afford to
be ignorant.
Unto this Last is an admirable introduction to the
study, first for its spiritual appeal, next for its sin-
cerity and fervour, and last^-but truly not least — for
its fine English, its music of phrase and felicity of
word, its rich fullness of thought. The writer's love

of knowledge and his wide culture enable him to illu-
minate his theme with unexpectedly piercing lights
his ardent thought glows through his vivid expression
his occasional extravagances are the outcome of a
justifiable moral indignation.
Tardily enough his ethical fervour has evoked
response. But in many of the measures of to-day
may be discerned the practical equivalents of his
teachings. His ridiculed proposal of fixed payments
for labour is embodied in the acceptance of what is
implied in " the living wage " his plans for the aged
;
and indigent in the Old Age Pensions; for childhood

and youth the extensions of the early Education
Acts, and notably the " Fisher " Act of 1918. The
broadening theories underlying the possession of
land, covering fixity of tenure and compensation
for improvements; and the communal recognition
of unprivileged people implied in the compulsory
176 COMMENTARY
provision by local authorities of allotments, in the
preservation of commons and the maintenance of
rights of way, are outcomes of the ethical system he
upheld. The payment by public bodies (who are at
once the representatives and the guardians of the
community) of the Trades Unions' rates of wages,
and the shouldering by government and municipali-
ties of responsibility for the housing of the people,
are the logical conclusions of his once unpopular,
humane assumptions.
A leading writer in political economy 1
(1900)
enumerates some of the most important economic
truths laid down by Ruskin in his various works
1. That a right theory of consumption is of
primary importance in economics, and no estimate
of wealth is reasonable which does not regard the
quality of the product and the use to which it is put.
2. That, therefore, we must understand the
nature not only of positive, but also of negative
wealth; and not only of well-directed but also of
ill-directed production and consumption.
3. That, as a consequence, economic science is
bound up indissolubly with ethics.
At the same time it is pointed out that Ruskin's
lack of historical knowledge of past ages, apart from
their material monuments, dulled his perception of
much that has to be known before the true functions
of government can be rightly defined. Thus, he seems
to v/elcome the tremendous encroachments of the
1
C. S. Devas.
state upon the province of the family and the
individual which made possible the unreasoning
docility of the German people to the claims of its
official rulers. Were governments perfectly wise and
altogether good they might wield unlimited power
without tyranny; but as the state is only "our-
selves in our official capacity," our weaknesses and
selfishnesses and crookednesses do not undergo a
transformation because seven or twenty-seven of us
act together instead of singly. With his love of
beauty and delight in skill it is no wonder that our
blackened countrysides and ugly towns, our machine-
made furniture and fabrics, and our insensitiveness
to art and literature and the things of the spirit, led
him to desire the banishment of machinery and
industrial activity, and the restoration of quiet and
individual methods of getting a living.
But with all qualifications made, the utterances of
Ruskin upon economics are at once a valuable and
inspiring legacy. He spoke as a prophet, and the
prophet's function is to create a spirit rather than to
state a programme. Perhaps we may close with an
application of his own definition in estimating the
" wealth " of his bequest, as " the possession of the
valuable by the valiant."
1 1 :
INDEX
Accumulation, of capacity, Children, 108
20 95,
> 97', of material, 112 Cicero's definition of Wealth,
Advantage, 103 12
Affection, 19 Colonisation, 120
Agriculture, 17 Commerce, 34, 40
Almsgiving, 64 Competition, 797*., 82
Anarchy, 54 Consumption, 85W., 109, 113,
Aristophanes, no 116
Aristotle, 65W. Co-operation, 82
Art, 72,n.; of life, 124 Corn laws, the, 78
Author's Works, quoted Credit, 67
A Joy for Ever {Political Currencies, 58
Economy of Art), 17, 82
Modern Painters, 82 Dante quoted or referred to,
Stones of Venice, ?8n.
68, 83, 89, in
Autolycus, 2>7 Death, 38, 62, ios».
Avarice, 19, in
Demand, 29, 31, 65, 98, 113;
definition of, gin.
Bacchus, 96
Demas, in
Bank, 94 Dura plains, 56
Bayonets, 86
Blood, circulation of, 49; red
ink of, 10 Economy, political, 19, 49/2.,
Buying, 126 50, 82, 91 definition of, 45 ;
;
Byzants, 59 mercantile, 44; national, 57,

83, ii3
Capacity, 96 England, 60, 79^., 123, 125
Capital, 82, 114W., 119 Equity, 64W.
Capitalists, 43, 11472. Exchange, 70M., 73, 100, 102
Caput vivum, 109
Catallactics, 10 Free Trade, 78;?.
Cheapness, 106 Furrows, no
179
i8o UNTO THIS LAST
Golconda, 60 Mill, J. S., quoted or referred
Gold, 58, 95 to, 12, 84, 86, 94, 113, 122
Greeks, 96 Money, 56, 58, 69, 109, 113,
Gjmmastics, 21 126
Natural scenery, 123

Happiness, 116, 124
Health, laws of, 15, 94
Need and desire, 103
Helps, Sir Arthur, quoted,

86n. Occupation, 80
Herbert, George, quoted, g$n. Old, the, 17
Honesty, 13, 14 Over-population, 79
Indus, 60 Payment, 69, 73

Intermittent labour, 32 Pensions, 17
Islands, castaways on, 50-53 Plato, definition of Wealth, 1
Ixion, no Ploughshare, 86, no
Political economy, 19, 5 on.,
balances of,
8$, 113, 116; definition of,
Justice, 23, 57,
45. 49
64, 69, 7L 77 Political Economy of A rt, 1
Poor, the, 62, 79, 99, n8n.

Kings, 68 Pope, quoted, 13, 80, 98
Population, 60, 117, 121, 123
Price, 23, 74, 84, gin., 99
Labour, false direction of, 5-6;
Production, 107, 112, 115
organisation of, n; de-
Profit, 99
mand for, 29; regular, 33;
Property, 82, 94
best, 39; standard of value
in, 52; pledged, 52; pay-
ment of, 69; consumed un- Ricardo, Mr., quoted, 89, 113.
productively, 79; definition 120
of, 105; value of, 105 Riches, 33, 44, 47, 50, 53. 5^,
Life, 105, 107, 116, 124, 126 83, n8».
Livy, quoted, 17, 95
Luxury, 15^., 56, 127 Schools, 15, 16, 4gn.
Science of political economy,
Madonna delta Salute, 94 19, 43, 66, 83, 93, 98; of
Marah, 66 wealth, 97; of exchange,
Market, 37, 57> 6 9 101
Merchant, 37, 40; Jew, 61 Signs, algebraical, 55, 10
INDEX 181
Soldiers, 34, 38, 82 Wages, 29, 31, t,2, 59, 122;
Specific gravity, 74 fixed, n; equality of, 31;
Spending, 109, 126 just, 72
Strikes, 21 Waste, 45, 126
Wealth, 12, 46, 54, 82, 84, 116;
Taxation, 78 definition of, 12, 94; in-
Tisiphone, 10572. equalities of, 48; circula-
Tyranny, 56 tion of, 49; natural, 55;
justice lessens power of, yy;
essence of, 59; Ruskin's
Under-payment, 75
Unemployed, the, 81 own definition, 97; science
of, 97
Use and abuse, 96
Wordsworth, quoted or re-
Usefulness, 87, 94
ferred to, 17, 116
Work, Sow.
Value, defined (Mm), 92,
97 Xenophon, definition of
Virgil, quoted, no Wealth, 1:
Te.v\fU! Pft£55
'IMfrgi''
READER'S NOTES
The remaining pages of this book are intended for manuscript
Notes bearing upon the subject under consideration
182
^ 0^
XV
*/
%
.«<?«
-^.<j^%%
o V
N MANCHESTER,
.
INDIANA 46962)
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
013 606 757 6

Unto This Last 00 Rusk

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Unto This Last 00 Rusk

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Unto This Last 00 Rusk

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

HB 161

Author's Preface .... 7

Unto This Last —

now fully appreciated, and the keen interest newly

of his position as an economist, and some notes,

reading alone, as well as to teachers desiring to in-

I. The four following essays were published eighteen

least important, though by no means the least certain,

for common purposes, of what is meant by wealth."

4. It was, therefore, the first object of these follow-

i4 UNTO THIS LAST

assuring ourselves, that there are yet in the world

in our captains, the organisation of labour is easy,

1 " The effectual discipline which is exercised over a work-

(a) the laws of health, and the exercises enjoined

adeo exiguis, ut funeri sumtus deesset de publico est elatus.

principles, not for the direct success of plans: and

THE ROOTS OF HONOUR

i. Among the delusions which at different periods

have possessed themselves of the minds of large

and the desire of progress are constant elements. Let

progress on this negation of a soul; and having shown

to the present phase of the world.

5. It would be strange if it could, it being not by

convenient to consider men as actuated by no other

large quantity of material work may be done under

can give his master. But good of all kinds, whether

master will be injurious to an unjust one.

desirable or noble, or in any other way abstractedly

THE ROOTS OF HONOUR 27

only become a true motive power when they ignore

11. The next and simplest example of

and none of them are in any wise willing to give his

this apparent anomaly, in moral matters, but by

while, for all the important, and much of the unim-

shower, we do not canvass the cabmen, to find one

pay, contentedly, with equal fees, the good and bad

than if it assured and continuous; and however

severe the struggle for work may become, the general

his own business operations on a scale which will

the system of violent exertion for nominally high day

34 UNTO THIS LAST

at the service of the State. Reckless he may be

he knows that this choice may be put to him at any

first object in all his dealings must be (the public

they have called commerce was not commerce at all,

merce, as in true preaching, or true fighting, it is

The Physician's, to keep it in health.

to get profit for himself out of that provision than

And because the production or obtaining of any

be always considering how to produce what he sells

to give up, if need be, his life, in such a way as

it may be demanded of him. Two main points he

together with the general tone and atmosphere of

Supposing the captain of a frigate saw it right, or

ing matters political being false in premises, absurd

THE VEINS OF WEALTH

26. The answer which would be made by any

" It is indeed true that certain advantages of a

practically effective. Persons who follow its precepts