Engr. Calc.

Fundamentals Page 1
Engineering Calculation Fundamentals
Introduction
This document is meant to help you attain (or review) some basic skills that physicists
and engineers should have like using significant figures or converting units. In courses
in your Engineering Physics curriculum it will be assumed that you have these
fundamental skills described in this document, but very little mention will be made of
these fundamentals unless you make mistakes and sometimes not even then. The point
is that these skills may get overlooked by you for the moment, but will inevitably come
back to haunt you. Now is as good a time as any to deal with these skills that are often
viewed as the picky details. So lets get started.
Engineering Calculations
The first skill that is important is the subject of calculations. This may include order of
magnitude approximations (sometimes called back of the envelope calculations), using
your calculator for a homework problem, or your own computer program to crunch data
from research. Each of these calculations are very different and may require very
different resources, precision, and total time to complete. Although it is an important
skill to be able to differentiate the requirements to perform a calculation, this is not the
subject covered by this document. This document is instead intended as an introduction
to the techniques you should use to perform the calculations. It is also intended to serve
as a reference for you when confronted with problems in more advanced courses.
2006 Evan C. Lemley
Engr. Calc. Fundamentals Page 2
Engineers and scientists make many calculations and estimates and base decisions on
these calculated or estimated values. Often these skills are overlooked as trivial, but are
probably the most common source of errors even for experienced engineers. As an
example the rules determining the proper number of significant digits for a measured
value are really not that difficult to follow, but if these rules are either not known or are
forgotten then errors may be made. Even if these errors are small (i.e. one digit) the
consequences may still be significant since most values are used for subsequent
calculations. Another reason a single digit error may be important is that the one digit
may mean additional costs to your company or a client.
Scalar values
This part of the document is focused on numerical calculations so the starting point
should be numbers in particular we should deal with scalars. Scalars are pure
numbers like 5 and as such represent only a magnitude. Many quantities in physics and
engineering are scalars such as temperature, distance, or energy so it must be
important in physics and engineering to be able to deal with scalars. There are other
types of entities in physics and engineering that are not just magnitudes, but also include
directions (vectors) or directional components in other directions (tensors). A brief
discussion of vectors is included here, but tensors are left for advanced work in fluid
mechanics and other areas.
The basic terminology of scalars is given in Table One.
2006 Evan C. Lemley
Engr. Calc. Fundamentals Page 3
Table 1Mathematical nomenclature for scalars.
Scalar Type Definition Comments
Natural
Numbers
The numbers 1, 2, 3.
Integer
Numbers
All Natural Numbers plus 0, -1,
-2.
Rational
Numbers
Any scalar that may be written as
p/q (q 0 and p and q both
integers).
All rational numbers may be
written as a repeating decimal
fraction.
Irrational
Numbers
Decimal fraction representations
never repeat.
Examples:
e = 2.71828
= 3.141592
Real Numbers Includes all Rational and
Irrational that do not include i
2
=
-1
1, 1.0,
Complex
Numbers
May be written as a + bi a and b are real numbers, where
i
2
= -1.
When a scalar represents a physical quantity like temperature, then the scalar will have
units in this case degrees Celsius would work. Units will be discussed more
thoroughly in a subsequent section.
To wrap up this initial discussion of scalars several comments are in order. First, it will
be assumed that arithmetic operations with scalars are familiar to you and that
evaluating a more involved string of arithmetic operations is an easy process for you. So
the following should be a simple evaluation (3
2
x 2 + 4 )/ 11 = 2. Second, this document
for the moment deals only with decimal or base-10 scalars. Number systems with other
bases are certainly of use, but are left to other courses. Finally, you should be able to
2006 Evan C. Lemley
Engr. Calc. Fundamentals Page 4
perform the scalar operations one a series of one-digit scalars without the use of a
calculator. It turns out estimating the result of a somewhat complicated calculation can
be an efficient way to check a calculator result (calculator errors are common). This
process of estimating the result of a complicated equation amounts to performing simple
arithmetic operations on single digit scalar values. This proficiency with single digit
scalars should include dealing with non-decimal values i.e. fractions.
Scientific and Engineering Notation
Since many scalar values are either very large or very small (relative to a single digit) a
convenient way to express scalar values is to use scientific notation. You may already be familiar
with scientific notation, but this section will serve as a brief review. As an example lets say we
wanted to write the length 123 cm in scientific notation. The result would look like
1.23 x 10
2
cm
Of course 10
2
is the same as 100, so multiplying the value 1.23 times 100 gives the
correct number of centimeters. Note, it is standard to write numbers in scientific notation
in the form
m.nop x 10
q
There is one digit before the decimal and the remaining significant digits (discussed
thoroughly in a subsequent section) are placed after the decimal. The exponent q may
be any integer (as described in a previous section). As another example note that 123
cm is the same as 0.00123 km. So in scientific notation this would be
1.23 x 10
-3
km
Engineering notation is similar to scientific notation, but different in that the exponent
must always be a multiple of three (3) (this includes zero). This rule for the exponent
means that many numbers may not be able to be written in the format of scientific
2006 Evan C. Lemley
Engr. Calc. Fundamentals Page 5
notation where one writes only one digit before the decimal and the remaining digits
after. Instead, in engineering notation, the first number is always written between one
(1) and 1000 to accommodate writing the exponent as a multiple of three. For example
if a radiation counter registers 15,255 counts in a one minute period, then the resulting
count rate in engineering notation would be
15.255 x 10
3
counts / minute.
Most likely your calculator can be set up to display in either scientific or engineering
notation. If I enter the above radiation counter measurement in my Casio fx-115W the
display appears as
1.52550000
04
when the calculator is set to display in scientific notation. When the calculator is
changed to engineering notation the display shows
15.255
K
The superscript suffix K means times 1000 on my calculator. If a significantly more
sensitive detector is used and a measurement of 15,255,000 counts are observed in
some time period, then the value entered on my calculator would appear as
Scientific: 1.5255
07
Engineering: 15.255
M
Here the superscript suffix M means x 1,000,000. The value entered as 0.000325 will
display on my Casio as:
Scientific: 3.25
-04
Engineering: 325

2006 Evan C. Lemley

Engr. Calc. Fundamentals Page 6
here the Greek letter means times 10
-6
. The symbols used are part of a convention
used with certain physical units and will be explained in more detail in the section on
units.
There is another way of displaying scientific notation that is very common on calculators
and in computer software. In this notation the above example of 0.000325 would be
displayed as
Scientific: 3.25E-04
Engineering: 325E-06
where the E refers to exponential notation. So the E just means times 10 raised to the
power of integer following the E. Note it is unlikely that your calculator displays scientific
and engineering notation the same as mine.
Scientific/Graphing Calculators
For most of your courses in engineering and physics you will need a scientific or
graphing calculator. The available of features and capabilities available for calculators
today is very robust. Luckily, many low-priced scientific calculators have 99% of the
capabilities you will need. It is OK to have a feature-heavy calculator capable of
performing symbolic integration, graphing, and other tasks, but in my experience most
students do not know how to use most of these features. For this reason even if a high-
powered calculator could help with a difficult problem (say on an exam) most students
do not know how to use these calculators to solve those problems. So for my money it
is best to go with a scientific calculator under $30 that is typically easier to use (and
oftentimes faster).
2006 Evan C. Lemley
Engr. Calc. Fundamentals Page 7
Even the low-end calculators are capable of doing quite a lot, but many simple
calculations require knowing the meaning of some arcane symbols printed on the face of
your calculator. For example to generate the calculator displays that are shown in the
previous section I had to change the mode of the display back and forth several times.
The ability to change this display is critical for every calculator user, but differs among
calculator models. The primary way that one learns how to change the calculator mode
and use calculator features is to HAVE ACCESS TO THE MANUAL THAT CAME WITH
YOUR CALCULATOR. I know it is very possible that you do not know where the
manual is, but you will definitely need the manual during your academic career. Many of
you have very sophisticated calculators with advanced graphing, symbolic,
computational, and storage capabilities. It is critical that you obtain a copy of the manual
for your calculator. Most calculator manufacturers publish these manuals on their web-
sites. For your reference here are links to web locations where you may find manuals:
Casio Manual Page:
http://www.casio.com/
Texas Instruments (navigate to your specific product to find your Guidebook):
http://education.ti.com/us/
Sharp Electronics (not that many manuals available at this printing):
http://www.sharp-usa.com/
Hewlett-Packard (Pretty hard to find the manuals here):
http://www.hp.com/
2006 Evan C. Lemley
Engr. Calc. Fundamentals Page 8
Significant digits
A significant digit is any scalar is any number that may be specified with confidence.
As an example consider the number 9302.02 where all digits are significant (this of
course would only be known initially by the person stating this value). This number has
6 significant digits The 9 on the far left is the most significant digit and the 2 on the
far right is the least significant digit. There are several ways one may know which digit
is the least significant digit, and knowing in which digit you are least confident (but still
confident) depends on how the number was gotten (e.g. a measurement versus a
calculation). These specific techniques for determining which digit is least significant are
not discussed for the moment, but assume that you know which digits are significant and
you are ready to report your value. The only thing you need to know to report this value
is the Rule for Writing Numbers, which says
Rule for Writing Numbers
Any nonzero digit in a number is a significant digit; and the digit zero () is significant
digit unless it is used to specify the location of the decimal place or used to fill the
location of discarded digits.
If numbers are written in the manner specified by the Rule for Writing Numbers by
someone who knows which digits are truly significant, then one can determine the
number of significant digits as follows:
2006 Evan C. Lemley
Engr. Calc. Fundamentals Page 9
Counting Significant Digits
Count the number of digits beginning with the first nonzero digit on the left and ending
with the last digit on the right - unless that digit is a zero () and satisfies one of the
exceptions in the Rule for Writing Numbers above.
Very often it is not quite clear what the person that wrote a number intended. For
example, if someone tells you that they measured a table and found it to be 320
centimeters long, then does that length have two or three significant digits? You might
guess it has three, but it actually depends on how the measurement was made. One
way to alleviate the confusion would be to specify the decimal point as 320. centimeters.
This implies that the zero is not used to specify the location of the decimal point, so that
the number has three (3) significant digits. If the decimal point is missing, then one
would have to assume that the number only had two (2) significant digits.
Another way to alleviate confusion is to write numbers in scientific notation. So that
table length would be 3.20x10
2
centimeters, which clearly has three (3) significant digits,
while 3.2x10
2
centimeters has only two (2) significant digits.
Another common technique used in textbooks is to only use zeros at the end of a
number if they are significant. For example if a problem specifies that a wheel has a
radius of 2.00 meters the author intends for you to consider the radius to have three (3)
significant digits. Often textbooks will inform you in the first few sections that you should
assume that numbers specified in textbook problems always should be considered to
have three or four digits or the professor teaching the course may inform you of his/her
2006 Evan C. Lemley
Engr. Calc. Fundamentals Page 10
preferences. You should carefully read your text to make sure you understand what is
intended.
Rounding
Rounding significant digits is another potentially confusing issue that arises due to the
fact that one carries extra figures (either by hand or stored in a calculator or
spreadsheet) during intermediate calculations. For example despite the fact that your
calculator might show up to 13 digits in a result, not all of those digits are warranted.
Assuming the number of significant digits is known one should use the rules for rounding
that are summarized in Table Two.
Table 2The rules for rounding numbers with a given number of significant digits.
When the first digit dropped is: The last digit retained:
< 5 Stays the same
>5 or a 5 followed by any nonzero
digits
Is increased by 1
5 not followed by nonzero digits Stays the same if even
Is increased by 1 if odd
This rounding rule may be a little different than what you have been told or used in the
past, but if followed it tends to minimize errors due to rounding.
As an example of using the rounding rule from Table Two consider that the
number 3.1545 appears on your calculator. If one rounds this number to one (1) digit,
the result would be 3. Rounding this value to successfully larger numbers of significant
digits yields the results in Table Three.
2006 Evan C. Lemley
Engr. Calc. Fundamentals Page 11
Table 3Example of rounding the number 3.1545.
Number of Significant Figures Rounded Number
2 3.2
3 3.15
4 3.154
The last row of the table may surprise you, but the rules for rounding in Table Two
indicate that an even number stays the same when it is followed by a five (5) and
nothing else this rule minimizes rounding errors when followed consistently. The
results of rounding the number 3.1575 are shown in Table Four.
Table 4Example of rounding the number 3.1575.
Number of Significant Figures Rounded Number
2 3.2
3 3.16
4 3.158
Please note that the last row in Table Two does occur, although certainly less frequently
than the cases shown in the previous rows.
Another important skill in numerical calculations is arithmetically combining numbers with
differing numbers of significant digits. There are very general rules to determine the
number of significant digits to retain after any given mathematical operation, but these
rules will be left to more advanced courses in your curriculum. For now the rules for
addition/subtraction and multiplication/division will be stated. Note that these rules will
get you quite a long way.
2006 Evan C. Lemley
Engr. Calc. Fundamentals Page 12
Addition/Subtraction. In the process of adding or subtracting two numbers the result
should have no digits beyond the last estimated decimal place of the number that had
the fewest number of decimal places. Despite the confusing sound of this rule, its pretty
simple. Consider adding two numbers: 3.2 and 7. If one writes these numbers one
above the other as follows
3.2
+ 7
---------
10. (both digits are significant)
The number 7 limits what we can do since it has zero decimal places. We still end up
with a result with two (2) significant figures, but we cannot use the 2 (of the 3.2). We
may however have to use the 2 to know how we round the result. For instance if the
problem had been 3.6 + 7. The result should be 11. What would the result be if we tried
3.5 + 7?
Multiplication/Division. Generally, the rule here is if multiplying/dividing two
numbers the result will have the same or one more significant digit than the number with
the least number of digits that was multiplied/divided. The following examples should
make this rule clear (all digits shown are significant):
2006 Evan C. Lemley
Engr. Calc. Fundamentals Page 13
1.2 x 3 = 3.6
9.81 / 3.14 = 3.12
2.34 x 5.1 = 11.9
2.34x10
4
/ 3.1x10
2
= 75 = 7.5x10
1
Practical Engineering Calculations
Engineering data is seldom known to better than 0.2%. As an example consider the
relative error between 9.97 and 9.99 (about 0.2%) and between 1.001 and 1.003 (about
0.2%) . Unless otherwise specified it is best to report final results to engineering
computations to either three or four significant digits. Here is the rule of thumb:
Engineering Calculation Rule of Thumb
When using typical engineering data carry through intermediate calculations with
more digits than justified (to minimize rounding error) and report the final results
with four (4) significant digits if the first digit is a 1; otherwise report the result with
three (3) digits.
Engineering Units
SI or metric units are used fairly often in engineering calculations, but frequently English
Engineering Units are used. This section is presented to help you properly use these
engineering units. All units systems have a set of base of fundamental quantities from
which almost all other units mat be derived. Usually the derivation occurs by using a
constitutive relationship like Newtons Second Law. Table Five shows which units are
fundamental and which are derived for several units systems.
2006 Evan C. Lemley
Engr. Calc. Fundamentals Page 14
Table 5Fundamental and derived units for several unit systems.
Dimension British
Gravitational
SI English
Engineering
Mass
(Fundamental)
kg lb
m
Force
(Fundamental)
lb
f
lb
f
Mass (Derived) slug
Force (Derived) N
Length ft m ft
Time s s s
Since English Engineering units have mass and force each as fundamental a factor is
required to make sure mass and force have the correct proportionality. This is achieved
using applying Newtons Second Law and by defining one lb
m
as the mass that creates a
weight of one lb
f
in a gravitational field with acceleration of 32.174 ft / s
2
. Newtons
Second Law may be written as
Equation 1
Where F is the force that would create an acceleration of magnitude a for a mass of m.
the factor k is the proportionality factor to make sure we get the correct force for a given
mass. For all unit systems besides the English Engineering system, k has a value of
one (1). For English Engineering k will have the following value
2006 Evan C. Lemley
kma F
Engr. Calc. Fundamentals Page 15
2
174 . 32
1
s lb
ft lb
k
f
m

Defining the g
c
as follows
2
174 . 32
s lb
ft lb
g
f
m
c

Consider the example of an object with a mass of 10 lb

m
. What would the weight of this
object be in a gravitational acceleration of 32.174 ft / s
2
? Using Eq.(5) one obtains
( ) ( )
f m
f
m
lb s ft lb
s lb
ft lb
F 10 / 174 . 32 10
174 . 32
1
2
2

So since the acceleration has the numerical value of 32.174 ft / s

2
, the weight has the
same numerical value as the mass.
In engineering, frequently you will need to convert the units of a quantity. Unit
conversion is relatively simple. The two examples below show how units may be
converted by multiplying by the appropriate conversion factors
hr
mi
hr
s
ft
mi
m
ft
s
m
56
3600
5280
1 281 . 3
25
3
3
3
531
281 . 3 594 . 14
03 . 1
m
kg
m
ft
slug
kg
ft
slug

,
_

Most physics and engineering textbooks include tables of conversion factors in an
appendix or elsewhere. You might get familiar with a particular conversion table in one
2006 Evan C. Lemley
Engr. Calc. Fundamentals Page 16
of your textbooks. When you are in front of a computer you can always use
http://www.onlineconversion.com/, which will perform many conversions.
Dimensional Analysis
Physics and Engineering Equations must be dimensionally consistent that is each side
and each additive term must have the same dimensions. Dimensions are just mass,
length, time, etc. Consider the equation for position versus time with uniform
acceleration in one-dimension
Equation 2
Now lets examine the dimensions of each quantity
] ][ [ ] ][ [ ] [ ] [
2
2
T
T
L
T
T
L
L L + +
where dimensions of length, L, and time, T, are represented in square brackets. Clearly,
each additive term in the equation has the same dimensions L. The fact that physical
relationships must satisfy the criterion of being dimensionally homogenous actually
allows one to determine the nature of a complicated physical relationship. This process
is called dimensional analysis and is a very valuable tool to understand complicated
multivariate relationships. There are textbooks completely devoted to this subject, but
for the moment lets consider a simple engineering problem and attempt to arrive at a
solution using dimensional analysis.
2006 Evan C. Lemley
2
0 0
2
1
) ( at t v x t x + +
Engr. Calc. Fundamentals Page 17
Consider the flow of a fluid over a smooth sphere as shown in Figure One. The basic
problem of drag on a smooth sphere has been studied in detail. The variables of interest
in this problem are shown in Figure One.
The variables in the above figure have the following meaning:
= density of fluid [kg/m
3
],
= absolute viscosity of fluid [N-s/m
2
],
V = velocity of fluid [m/s],
D = diameter of sphere [m], and
D
f
= drag on sphere [N].
The method of dimensional analysis involves analyzing the dimensions of all of the
variables involved and developing dimensionless parameters that describe the problem.
Following the Rayleigh Method the drag force D
f
is related to the other variables as
follows:
2006 Evan C. Lemley
Df
V
D

Approaching Fluid
Figure 1 Defining variables for drag due to external fluid flow over a smooth
spherical object.
Engr. Calc. Fundamentals Page 18
Equation 3:
Where
A
1
= an arbitrary constant, and
a-d = arbitrary exponents.
It may be shown that the functional relationship that arises from Eq.(3) is
Equation 4:
Where
C
D
= the coefficient of drag, and
Re
D
= Reynolds number.
Equation 5:
Equation 6:
Note that in Eq.(5), A is the projected area of the object (i.e. area normal to the flow). So
in the case of the solid sphere
2006 Evan C. Lemley
d c b a
f
D V A D
1

) (Re
D D
f C
A V
D
C
f
D 2
2 / 1

VD
D
Re
Engr. Calc. Fundamentals Page 19
Equation 7:
The Reynolds number has many physical interpretations, but these will be explored later
in your curriculum.
The importance of Eq.(4) is twofold: a many-variable problem has been simplified to one
independent variable (hence considerably fewer experiments have to be performed to
establish a relationship), and experiments may be performed with different fluids (even
at different conditions) or different dimensions to allow for modeling and prototyping.
These facts are termed dimensional and dynamic similarity.
Basic Statistics
Frequently in your academic career you will need to know some basic statistics; whether
it is to determine if the difference between two measured values is statistically significant
or to find your grade point average. In general statistics are just numerical ways of
expressing facts concerning data. The primary ways of expressing these facts are
through several quantities. To begin with one must assume that you have a perfect set
of data. This data is really imaginary because it requires that an infinite number of
measurements be made. One quantity of interest is the mean, x , which is just the
average value or centroid of the numerical data is calculated as
2006 Evan C. Lemley
2
4
D A

Engr. Calc. Fundamentals Page 20

Equation 8:
where
N = the total number of measurements,
x
i
= the value of the i
th
measurement.
Note the summation sign ( ) has been used to indicate that one would add up each
value of the measurement, x
i
then divide by the total number of measurements, N to
yield the mean. The standard deviation, , is a measure of how much the data is spread
out from the mean and can be calculated as
1
]
1

N
i
i
N
x x
N
1
2
_
2
) (
1
lim
Equation 9
Since in real circumstances one makes a finite number of measurements, Eqs.(1 and 2)
have to be modified to the sample mean and the sample standard deviation, which
are defined as

N
i
i
x
N
x
1
_
1
,
Equation 10
2006 Evan C. Lemley
)
1
( lim
1
_

N
i
i
N
x
N
x
Engr. Calc. Fundamentals Page 21
2
_
1
2
) (
1
1
x x
N
N
i
i

.
Equation 11
So when one makes another measurement, you could say that most of the time the
value will be within of x . To make all of this a little more concrete lets consider the
example of measuring the length of a table with a meter stick. Lets say you have
repeated the measurement nine times and recorded the lengths shown in Table 1
Table 6Measured lengths of a table.
Trial # Length
(meters)
1 1.022
2 1.024
3 1.023
4 1.021
5 1.022
6 1.024
7 1.020
8 1.025
9 1.026
The associated statistics for this data and how they are calculated are shown in Table 7.
2006 Evan C. Lemley
Engr. Calc. Fundamentals Page 22
Table 7Statistics calculations for table data.
i x
i
(meters)
x (Eq.
3)
(meters)
d
i
= x - x
i
(meters)
(d
i
)
2
(meters
)
2
(Eq. 4)
(meters)
1 1.022 1.023 0.001 1E-06 0.001936
2 1.024 -0.001 1E-06
3 1.023 0.000 0
4 1.021 0.002 4E-06
5 1.022 0.001 1E-06
6 1.024 -0.001 1E-06
7 1.020 0.003 9E-06
8 1.025 -0.002 4E-06
9 1.026 -0.003 9E-06
9.207 3E-05
So the meaning of these statistics is that if you measure the length of the table again
(call this measurement x) you will most likely find the length to be
x - < x < x +
or
1.021 meters < x < 1.025 meters.
So how do you know how many digits are significant in a given value? There are two
ways. First, one may use statistics to determine the precision of a given value that has
been measured multiple times. The precision just specifies which decimal place
contains the last significant digit and the minimum value of that digit. For example if one
2006 Evan C. Lemley
Engr. Calc. Fundamentals Page 23
measures the length of a table with a meter stick several times the result might be stated
as
1.2550 0.0005 meters
where the precision of the measurement is 0.0005 meters. If one has not made multiple
measurements, then an estimate of the precision may be made by considering the
precision of the device that was used to measure the value. Making multiple
measurements is the preferable way to find the precision, but often the second
technique is acceptable if multiple measurements (in the range of less than ten
measurements) will not dramatically increase the precision.
In the case where you made a measurement of a value or you know the details of a
measurement, then determining the number of significant digits is a matter of statistics.
For example if you are counting objects (lets say the number of cars in a parking lot)
and you count 128 cars in a parking lot, then how many significant digits does 128
have? The answer is probably three (3), but it may depend on how carefully you
counted or if you checked yourself by counting multiple times. Lets say you counted the
cars five times and came up with the numbers shown below in Table 8.
2006 Evan C. Lemley
Engr. Calc. Fundamentals Page 24
Table 8 Car counting results.
Trial # # of cars
1 128
2 125
3 128
4 129
5 130
How many cars are in the parking lot? Well now one has to do a little statistics to find
out. The average number of cars using Eq.(3) is 128, but is 128 three (3) significant
digits? To know one must know the standard deviation for the calculation. As calculated
using Eq.(4) the standard deviation is 2. Note that the standard deviation is only
specified with one digit, and that digit must be able to be added to or subtracted from
128. So the proper answer to the question how many cars are in the parking lot? is 128
2 . The last digit shown (i.e. the 2) is significant, since we know that there is a good
chance (around 68% in fact) that if we do the counting many times that the average will
fall between 126 and 130. So the last digit is important and may be specified with
confidence; thus 128 2 has three (3) significant digits. You will learn the specifics of
how to estimate the precision without making multiple measurements when you take
PHY 2014L Physics for Scientists and Engineers I Laboratory.
2006 Evan C. Lemley