H03 - Data Analysis
H03 - Data Analysis
Proper planning of experiments is key to obtain a satisfactory result. Look for experimental conditions
that reduce the complexity of the analysis, e.g. run the reaction with one or more reactants in excess.
Integral Method
Write the design equation for the type of reactor used in the experiments (Batch or PBR)
Substitute the mathematical function to be tested as a rate law into the design equation
Re-express any quantity that appear in the design equation and that varies with time (Batch) or
axial position (PBR) in terms of the dependent and independent variables.
Integrate and linearize the resulting design equation
Fit the linearized algebraic model equation to the experimental data
obtain estimates for the slope and intercept of the linearized model
obtain a correlation coefficient
Decide whether the function is sufficiently accurate in representing the data
based on a correlation coefficient value close to 1.0
based upon small deviations of the experimental data from the model prediction
based upon random, non-systematic deviations
If the fit is not sufficiently accurate, guess another function for the rate law and repeat
The use of the integral method is usually restricted at evaluating 0th, 1st, and 2nd order models.
dC A dC A dC A
= rA = −k = rA = −kC A = rA = −kC A2
dt dt dt
C 1 1
C A = C A0 − kt ln A0 = kt − = kt
CA C A C A0
If 0th, 1st, or 2nd order fail to provide a satisfactory fit, try the differential method!
1
ENCH 421 – Dr. Hector De la Hoz Siegler
Differential Method
If analysing differential reactors (i.e. PFR and PBR), make sure conversion was small in all
experiments (< 5%)
Write the design equation and substitute the mathematical function to be tested as a rate law
Linearize resulting expression treating the derivative as an experimentally measurable variable
for batch: rate should be evaluated at the prevailing conditions of the data point for
which the derivative was estimated
for PFR: rate should be evaluated at the average of the inlet and outlet composition
Approximate the derivatives (–dCA/dt) for each experimental data point:
Graphical differentiation: tangent method
Differentiation of a polynomial fit to the data
Numerical differentiation: finite differences
For PFR and PBR: use only forward differences
Fit the equation to the experimental data (graphically or using least squares)
obtain estimates for the slope and intercept
obtain the correlation coefficient
Decide whether the function is sufficiently accurate in representing the data
based on a correlation coefficient value close to 1.0
based upon small deviations of the experimental data from the model prediction
based upon random, non-systematic deviations
If the fit is not sufficiently accurate, guess another function for the rate law and repeat
dC A
−
dt p
k=
C αAp