Practical Research 1

SECOND QUARTER PRACTICAL EXAM

DESCRIPTION OF CRITERIA FOR RESEARCH PROPOSAL PRESENTATION

CRITERIA DESCRIPTION POINTS

This criterion evaluates the depth and quality of understanding regarding the key
components of the research proposal. It includes an assessment of the researcher's
Content and Knowledge 10
grasp of the background, problem statement, significance, literature review,
conceptual model, and research methodology in Chapters 1 to 3.
This criterion assesses the clarity of articulation, overall delivery, and the quality of
Clarity, Delivery, and responses to questions. It focuses on how well the presenter communicates ideas,
10
Quality of Answers maintains engagement, and provides clear and accurate answers, reflecting a deep
understanding of the research proposal content.
This criterion evaluates how well the presentation is structured and organized. It
assesses the logical flow of information, transitions between sections (Chapters 1 to 3),
Organization & Structure 10
and the overall coherence of the research proposal, ensuring that the audience can
easily follow the presentation.
This criterion focuses on the written component of the presentation, assessing the
format, writing style, and content of the manuscript corresponding to Chapters 1 to 3.
Manuscript 10
It considers the adherence to academic standards, clarity of writing, proper citation,
and the overall quality of the written material.
This criterion evaluates the visual and oral aspects of the presentation focused on the
interaction between presenters and panel members. It assesses the design and content
Slideshow and Overall
of the slides, ensuring they effectively complement the spoken presentation. 10
Presentation
Additionally, it considers the professionalism of the entire presentation, including the
presenter's ability to deliver information clearly and concisely to the panel members.
TOTAL 50
 Practical Research 1
SECOND QUARTER PRACTICAL EXAM
RUBRIC FOR RESEARCH PROPOSAL PRESENTATION
CRITERIA VERY SATISFACTORY (7-10) MODERATELY SATISFACTORY (4-6) NEEDS IMPROVEMENT (0-3)
Demonstrates a deep and comprehensive Shows a satisfactory understanding with Provides limited understanding, missing key
understanding with effective insights. some effective insights. insights.
Content and Information presented is highly relevant, Most information is relevant, with minor Contains minimal relevant information, with
Knowledge with seamless integration of examples. exceptions. significant gaps.
Consistently follows a specific citation style Effective integration of examples but may Significant issues in integrating examples and
with accurate references. have some challenges. citing sources.
Articulates ideas exceptionally clearly with an Communicates ideas clearly, with a Struggles to articulate ideas clearly, affecting
appropriate pace. generally appropriate pace. overall comprehension.
Clarity,
Maintains exceptional eye contact and Demonstrates effective use of eye contact Non-verbal cues are ineffective and hinder
Delivery, and
effectively uses gestures and body language. and non-verbal cues. communication.
Quality of
Provides high-quality answers with accuracy, Provides answers that are generally Answers are factually incorrect or
Answers
clarity, and depth. accurate but may lack some depth or significantly lack depth.
clarity.
Presents a logically organized structure Demonstrates logical organization but Presents with noticeable disorganization,
exceptionally well. may lack clarity in transitions. impacting clarity.
Organization & Creates a well-organized structure with clear Some sections are well-organized with Significant issues in transitions, leading to
Structure transitions. moderate transitions. confusion.
Smooth transitions with a logical flow Adequate transitions but may lack overall Lacks organization, leading to a confusing
between sections. flow. structure.
Adheres to standard academic format with Mostly follows academic format with Format is unclear or inconsistent, hindering
clear and concise writing. minor deviations; writing is mostly clear. clarity.
Presents comprehensive and highly relevant Mostly clear and relevant content with Major gaps or inaccuracies in content;
Manuscript
content with accurate citations. minor improvements possible. citations are problematic.
Exceptional manuscript with high-quality Very satisfactory manuscript, meeting Major issues in content, format, and writing,
content, format adherence, and clear writing. expectations with minor improvements. significantly impacting quality.
Professional design with clear, focused slides Mostly professional design with minor Significant issues in design, impacting overall
and high-quality visuals. improvements possible. clarity.
Slideshow and Smooth transitions with a logical flow Mostly smooth transitions with minor Major issues in slide-to-slide coherence;
Overall between slides. improvements. significant problems in timing.
Presentation Actively engages the audience with Maintains audience interest with some Significant issues in engagement strategies;
questions, interactive elements, and high- engagement strategies. overall presentation is unclear and lacks
quality overall presentation. audience connection.
 Practical Research 1
SECOND QUARTER PRACTICAL EXAM

TABLE OF SPECIFICATIONS

SUBJECT: Practical Research 1 DATE: January 19, 2024

QUARTER COVERAGE: 1st and 2nd

LEVELS OF ASSESSMENT
No. of No. of Knowledge Process or Skills Understanding Products
TOPIC/LESSONS Days Items Comprehension Application Analysis Synthesis Evaluation
taught per topic (%) (60%) (20%) (20%) (%)
Identifying the Inquiry and
4 10 Slideshow and
Stating the Problem
Overall Presentation
Learning from Others and
4 10 (10)
Reviewing the Literature Clarity, Delivery,
Content and
Systematically Collecting and Quality of
4 10 Organization and Knowledge (10)
and Understanding Data Answers (10)
Structure (10)
Data Collection and
4 10
Analysis
Manuscript (10)
Referencing 4 10
TOTAL 20 50 30 10 10

Prepared and Submitted by:

Mr. Elizer Syrus M. Paule

Mr. Prince Nhyllz Xyruze T. Pontanares
Faculty, FEUR Cainta SED

Checked by:

Mr. John Cristopher B. Ubaldo

Academic Coordinator, FEUR Cainta SHS
 Practical Research 1
SECOND QUARTER PRACTICAL EXAM

Noted by:

Mara Cassandra Llantada

Ma. Angela Pareja
Nathan Robert Jacob
Justine Salazar
Judy Ann Mejia
Joaana Mary Herramia
Jean Glycel Dula
Genewel Geneza
Dexter Almario

Approved by:

Mrs. Maria Teresa S. Angeles Mr. Enrico Xavier Quodala Mrs. Susan V. Torres
Principal, FEUR Rodriguez Principal- FEUR Marikina Principal – FEUR Cainta