REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES

TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES

COLLEGE OF INDUSTRIAL EDUCATION
Professional Industrial Education Department
Ayala Boulevard, Manila

Topic: Unveiling Relationships: A Guide to Correlation Analysis Using SPSS

Barbacena, Cherrypyn B. (2023). Guide To Quantitative Data Analysis

A. Pearson Correlation Analysis

Pearson correlation analysis is a statistical technique used to measure the strength and direction of the linear
relationship between two continuous variables. It is widely used in research to examine the association
between variables and assess the degree of their linear dependency.

Pearson correlation analysis is a method for quantifying the linear relationship between two variables. The
resulting correlation coefficient, denoted as r, ranges from -1 to +1, where -1 represents a perfect negative
linear relationship, +1 represents a perfect positive linear relationship, and 0 indicates no linear relationship
between the variables.

The key characteristics of Pearson correlation analysis are as follows:

• It measures only the linear relationship between variables, disregarding any non-linear associations.
• It provides both the strength and direction of the relationship through the correlation coefficient.
• It assumes that the relationship between the variables is bivariate and continuous.
• It does not imply causation, but rather captures the degree of association.

Assumptions for Pearson Correlation Analysis:

To ensure valid and meaningful results, several assumptions should be met when using Pearson correlation
analysis:
• Linearity: The relationship between the variables should be linear. If the relationship is non-linear, other
correlation measures (e.g., Spearman's rank correlation) may be more appropriate.
• Normality: The variables should be normally distributed or close to normal. Deviations from normality can
affect the accuracy of the correlation coefficient.
• Homoscedasticity: The variability of the scores should be consistent across all levels of the variables.
• Independence: Observations of the variables should be independent of each other.

Sample Inferential Research Questions and Hypotheses:

Pearson correlation analysis can be used to explore various research questions and test hypotheses. Here are
a few examples specifically related to hybrid learning:

Research Question: Is there a relationship between students' online engagement and their academic
performance in hybrid learning environments?

Hypothesis: There is a positive correlation between students' online engagement and academic performance
in hybrid learning environments.

Research Question: Does the amount of in-person classroom interaction correlate with students' overall
satisfaction in hybrid learning? Hypothesis: There is a positive correlation between in-person classroom
interaction and students' overall satisfaction in hybrid learning.

Source: Barbacena, Cherrypyn B. (Copyright 2023) Guide to Quantitative Data Analysis

RESOURCE MATERIALS ARE FOR THIS COURSE USED ONLY & NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION
 REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES
COLLEGE OF INDUSTRIAL EDUCATION
Professional Industrial Education Department
Ayala Boulevard, Manila

How to perform Pearson correlation analysis using SPSS:

Step 1: Import your data into SPSS. Step

2: Navigate to Analyze > Correlate > Bivariate.
Step 3: Select the variables you want to analyze and move them into the "Variables" box. Step
4: Choose the desired correlation coefficient (Pearson, Spearman, etc.) and select any additional options. Step
5: Click "OK" to run the analysis.

Examples of SPSS-Generated Output with Table Annotations: Upon running Pearson correlation analysis
in SPSS, you will obtain output that includes a correlation matrix and various statistical measures. Here is an
example of annotated SPSS output:

Correlations
Variable A Variable B
Variable A 1.000 0.672**
Variable B 0. 672** 1.000
** p < 0.01

• The correlation matrix above displays the Pearson correlation coefficients between Variable A and
Variable B.
• The correlation coefficient between Variable A and Variable B is 0.672, indicating a moderately strong
positive linear relationship. The correlation coefficient between Variable B and Variable A is the same
since Pearson correlation is symmetric.
• The ** symbol denotes statistical significance at the p < 0.01 level, indicating that the correlation coefficient
is unlikely to have occurred by chance.

Examples of Results, Discussion, Recommendations, and Implications to Theory & Practice:

Example 1: Relationship between Online Engagement and Academic Performance

Results: The analysis revealed a significant positive correlation between students' online engagement and
their academic performance in hybrid learning (r = 0.672, p < 0.01). This suggests that students who
actively engage in online learning activities tend to have higher academic performance.

Discussion: The findings support the notion that increased online engagement positively influences academic
performance in hybrid learning environments. This highlights the importance of designing effective online
learning materials and promoting student engagement to enhance educational outcomes.

Recommendations: Educators should consider implementing strategies to foster student engagement in online
components of hybrid learning, such as interactive multimedia, discussion forums, and collaborative projects.
Providing timely feedback and personalized support can further enhance students' online engagement and
improve their academic performance.

Implications to Theory & Practice: These findings contribute to the existing literature on hybrid learning by
emphasizing the significance of online engagement as a predictor of academic success. It underscores the
need for instructional designers and educators to develop engaging online learning environments that support
student motivation and active participation.

Source: Barbacena, Cherrypyn B. (Copyright 2023) Guide to Quantitative Data Analysis

RESOURCE MATERIALS ARE FOR THIS COURSE USED ONLY & NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION
 REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES
COLLEGE OF INDUSTRIAL EDUCATION
Professional Industrial Education Department
Ayala Boulevard, Manila

Example 2: Relationship between In-Person Classroom Interaction and Satisfaction

Results: The analysis revealed a significant positive correlation between the amount of in-person classroom
interaction and students' overall satisfaction in hybrid learning (r = 0.586, p < 0.01). This indicates that
students who experience more interaction in the physical classroom tend to report higher levels of satisfaction
with the hybrid learning experience.

Discussion: The findings suggest that face-to-face interactions in the classroom play a crucial role in students'
satisfaction with hybrid learning. This highlights the value of social connections, real-time discussions, and
collaborative activities in promoting positive learning experiences.

Recommendations: Educators should design hybrid learning environments that facilitate meaningful in-person
interactions, such as group projects, class discussions, and peer collaborations. Incorporating active learning
strategies that encourage student engagement during face-to-face sessions can enhance satisfaction and
overall learning outcomes.

Implications to Theory & Practice: These findings contribute to the understanding of the importance of physical
classroom interactions in hybrid learning. They underscore the need to strike a balance between online and in-
person components, emphasizing the unique benefits of face-to-face interactions for student satisfaction and
engagement.

B. Spearman Correlation Analysis

Spearman correlation analysis, also known as Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, is a statistical measure
used to assess the strength and direction of the monotonic relationship between two variables. Unlike Pearson
correlation, which measures linear relationships, Spearman correlation evaluates the association between
variables based on their ranks. It was developed by Charles Spearman in 1904 and is widely used in social
sciences, psychology, and other fields where the data may not conform to linear relationships.

The Spearman correlation coefficient (ρ) ranges from -1 to +1, where -1 indicates a perfect negative monotonic
relationship, +1 indicates a perfect positive monotonic relationship, and 0 suggests no monotonic relationship.
The coefficient reflects the degree to which the ranks of two variables correspond. A higher absolute value of ρ
indicates a stronger monotonic relationship.

Assumptions and When to Use:

Spearman correlation analysis has fewer assumptions compared to other correlation measures, such as
Pearson correlation. It is suitable when:
a. Variables are measured on ordinal, interval, or ratio scales.
b. The relationship between variables is monotonic rather than linear.
c. The data contain outliers or non-normal distributions.
d. The relationship may not be strictly linear and can be better captured by rank order.

Spearman correlation is a non-parametric measure, meaning it does not require assumptions about the
underlying distribution of the data. Therefore, it is robust against violations of normality assumptions and can
handle skewed or non-normally distributed data.

Spearman correlation analysis can help answer various research questions, such as:

Source: Barbacena, Cherrypyn B. (Copyright 2023) Guide to Quantitative Data Analysis

RESOURCE MATERIALS ARE FOR THIS COURSE USED ONLY & NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION
 REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES
COLLEGE OF INDUSTRIAL EDUCATION
Professional Industrial Education Department
Ayala Boulevard, Manila

a. Is there a significant monotonic relationship between X and Y?

b. Does the rank order of variable X correspond to the rank order of variable Y?
c. What is the strength and direction of the monotonic relationship between X and Y?

Hypotheses for Spearman correlation can be formulated as follows:

a. Null hypothesis (H0): There is no significant monotonic relationship between X and Y.

b. Alternative hypothesis (H1): There is a significant monotonic relationship between X and Y.

SPSS Applications:
In SPSS, the procedure for conducting Spearman correlation involves the following steps:
a. Open the dataset in SPSS.
b. Go to "Analyze" > "Correlate" > "Bivariate."
c. Select the variables you want to analyze.
d. Choose "Spearman" as the correlation coefficient.
e. Click "OK" to obtain the results.

Examples of SPSS-Generated Output with Table Annotations:

Here is an example of SPSS-generated output for Spearman correlation analysis, along with annotations
explaining each component:

Spearman's rho correlation coefficient

Variable 1 Variable 2 N Spearman’s Rho Sig

Case 1 | 12 | 4 | 100 | -0.524* | 0.001 |

Case 2 |8 | 6 | 100 | -0.302 | 0.056 |

In the above output:

"Variable 1" and "Variable 2" represent the variables being analyzed.
"N" indicates the number of cases included in the analysis.
"Spearman's rho" displays the Spearman correlation coefficient (ρ) for each variable pair.
"Sig." represents the significance level (p-value) associated with the Spearman correlation coefficient. It
indicates the probability of obtaining a correlation as extreme as or more extreme than the observed
correlation, assuming the null hypothesis of no correlation.

In the provided example output, we can see two cases.

In Case 1, the Spearman correlation coefficient is -0.524 with a significant p-value of 0.001. This indicates a
moderate negative monotonic relationship between Variable 1 and Variable 2.
In Case 2, the Spearman correlation coefficient is -0.302, but the p-value (0.056) is not significant at the
conventional 0.05 level, suggesting no significant monotonic relationship.

Results, Discussion, Recommendations, and Implications to Theory & Practice:

Based on the results of Spearman correlation analysis, the findings can be interpreted, discussed, and related
to theory and practice. Let's consider an example scenario:

Source: Barbacena, Cherrypyn B. (Copyright 2023) Guide to Quantitative Data Analysis

RESOURCE MATERIALS ARE FOR THIS COURSE USED ONLY & NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION
 REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES
COLLEGE OF INDUSTRIAL EDUCATION
Professional Industrial Education Department
Ayala Boulevard, Manila

Suppose we conducted a study examining the relationship between students' hours of study per week and
their academic performance (measured as GPA) in a hybrid learning environment. The Spearman correlation
analysis yielded the following results:

Spearman's rho correlation coefficient:

Study hours GPA N Spearman’s Rho Sig
25 3.5 100 | 0.601** 0.001

The results of the Spearman correlation analysis reveal a significant positive monotonic relationship between
students' study hours and their GPA in a hybrid learning environment. The correlation coefficient (ρ) is 0.601,
indicating a moderate-to-strong positive association. The p-value (p < 0.001) indicates that this relationship is
statistically significant.

The findings suggest that students who spend more time studying tend to have higher GPAs. This aligns with
previous research that highlights the importance of study habits and effort in academic achievement. The
positive correlation implies that as students increase their study hours, their academic performance improves.
This finding provides empirical support for the idea that investing more time in studying can lead to better
academic outcomes.

Based on these results, there are several recommendations that can be made for both educators and students
in a hybrid learning environment:

Students should allocate sufficient study time: The findings emphasize the importance of dedicating an
appropriate amount of time to studying. Students should recognize that investing more hours in studying
can contribute to improved academic performance. It is crucial to strike a balance between study time and
other responsibilities to avoid burnout.

Develop effective time management strategies: To maximize the benefits of study hours, students should
develop effective time management strategies. This includes creating a study schedule, setting specific
study goals, and avoiding procrastination. By organizing their study time efficiently, students can optimize
their learning outcomes.

Prioritize learning activities: It is essential for students to prioritize their learning activities during study
hours. They should focus on tasks that are directly related to their coursework and align with their learning
goals. Prioritizing the most important and challenging topics can help students make the most of their study
time.

Implications to Theory & Practice:

The implications of this finding for theory suggest that the relationship between study hours and academic
performance holds true in a hybrid learning environment. It adds to the existing literature that emphasizes the
significance of study habits and effort in achieving better academic outcomes. The findings provide empirical
evidence supporting the theoretical understanding that investing more time in studying leads to improved
academic performance.

From a practical standpoint, the results have important implications for educators and students. Educators
should emphasize the importance of study habits and provide guidance on effective study strategies. They can
encourage students to allocate dedicated study hours and help them develop time management skills.

Source: Barbacena, Cherrypyn B. (Copyright 2023) Guide to Quantitative Data Analysis

RESOURCE MATERIALS ARE FOR THIS COURSE USED ONLY & NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION
 REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES
COLLEGE OF INDUSTRIAL EDUCATION
Professional Industrial Education Department
Ayala Boulevard, Manila

Students, on the other hand, should recognize the value of investing time in studying and adopt strategies to
manage their study hours effectively.

Overall, these findings contribute to the understanding of the factors influencing academic performance in a
hybrid learning environment and provide practical recommendations for both educators and students to
enhance learning outcomes.

C. Kendall Tau Correlation Analysis

Kendall Tau correlation analysis is a non-parametric statistical method used to measure the strength and
direction of the association between two variables. It is specifically designed to handle ordinal data, where the
variables are ranked or ordered. The Kendall Tau coefficient, denoted as τ (tau), ranges between -1 and 1,
where -1 represents a perfect negative association, 1 represents a perfect positive association, and 0 indicates
no association between the variables.

Unlike parametric correlation measures (e.g., Pearson correlation), Kendall Tau is distribution-free and does
not require the assumption of normality. It is robust against outliers and can be applied to variables with
nonlinear relationships. Kendall Tau is a rank-based method, meaning it only considers the relative ordering of
observations, disregarding their actual values. This makes it suitable for analyzing data that does not meet the
assumptions of parametric tests.

Characteristics of Kendall Tau Correlation Analysis:

• Non-parametric nature: Kendall Tau correlation analysis does not assume a specific distribution for the
variables being analyzed, making it suitable for ordinal data.
• Robustness: Kendall Tau is robust to outliers, making it a reliable measure of association even in the
presence of extreme values.
• Interpretability: Kendall Tau can be easily interpreted, as its values range from -1 to +1, with 0 denoting no
correlation.
• Applicable to tied ranks: Kendall Tau handles tied ranks well, which is particularly relevant in situations
where there are several observations with the same value.

Assumptions for Kendall Tau Correlation Analysis:

• The variables should be measured on an ordinal scale or at least approximated as ordinal.
• The relationship between the variables should be monotonic, meaning that as the value of one variable
increases, the value of the other variable either increases or decreases consistently.
• Independence of observations: Each pair of observations should be independent of one another.
• The variables being analyzed should not exhibit a linear relationship, as Kendall Tau is designed for
assessing rank-order associations rather than linear associations.

It is important to note that Kendall Tau does assume the independence of observations and that ties (i.e.,
identical rankings) are treated appropriately. However, it does not assume the variables to be symmetrically
distributed or have equal variances.

Source: Barbacena, Cherrypyn B. (Copyright 2023) Guide to Quantitative Data Analysis

RESOURCE MATERIALS ARE FOR THIS COURSE USED ONLY & NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION
 REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES
COLLEGE OF INDUSTRIAL EDUCATION
Professional Industrial Education Department
Ayala Boulevard, Manila

Examples:
Research Question: Is there a significant association between students' online participation and their final
grades in a hybrid learning environment?

Hypothesis: There is a positive correlation between students' online participation and their final grades in a
hybrid learning environment.

Research Question: Does the level of teacher-student interaction influence students' satisfaction with hybrid
learning?

Hypothesis: There is a positive correlation between the level of teacher-student interaction and students'
satisfaction with hybrid learning.

SPSS Applications for Kendall Tau Correlation Analysis:

Step 1: Import your data into SPSS.

Step 2: Go to "Analyze" > "Correlate" > "Bivariate."
Step 3: Select the variables you want to analyze and move them to the "Variables" box.
Step 4: Click on the "Correlations" button.
Step 5: In the "Correlation Coefficients" section, select "Kendall's tau-b" as the desired correlation coefficient.
Step 6: Click "OK" to generate the output.

Examples of SPSS Generated Output with Table Annotations:

The table below illustrates an example of SPSS output for Kendall Tau correlation analysis:

Online Participation Final Grades

Online Participation 1.000 0.721**
Final Grades 0.721** 1.000
Note: ** p < 0.01 (two-tailed).

In this example, the correlation coefficient between online participation and final grades is 0.721, indicating a
strong positive correlation. The significance level (p-value) of less than 0.01 suggests that this correlation is
statistically significant.

Results, Discussion, Recommendations, and Implications to Theory & Practice:

The analysis of the data showed a significant positive correlation between online participation and final grades
in the hybrid learning environment (Kendall Tau = 0.721, p < 0.01). This means that there is a strong
relationship between the level of online participation and the students' final grades. Specifically, students who
actively engage in online activities tend to achieve higher grades compared to those who have lower levels of
online participation.

The finding of a positive correlation between online participation and final grades suggests that increased
online engagement contributes to academic success in hybrid learning settings. This result aligns with
previous research indicating that student engagement is a crucial factor in learning outcomes. When students
actively participate online, they have more opportunities to interact with course content, collaborate with peers,

Source: Barbacena, Cherrypyn B. (Copyright 2023) Guide to Quantitative Data Analysis

RESOURCE MATERIALS ARE FOR THIS COURSE USED ONLY & NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION
 REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES
COLLEGE OF INDUSTRIAL EDUCATION
Professional Industrial Education Department
Ayala Boulevard, Manila

and receive feedback from instructors, all of which can enhance their understanding and retention of the
material.

The positive correlation also indicates that online participation serves as an indicator of students' commitment
and involvement in the learning process. Students who are actively engaged online are likely to be more
motivated, self-directed, and proactive in their learning. They may also demonstrate better time management
and organizational skills, as active online participation requires regular and consistent effort.

Based on these findings, educators should encourage and facilitate student participation in online activities to
improve learning outcomes. Several strategies can be employed to promote engagement in the hybrid learning
environment:

Discussion forums: Create online discussion forums where students can share their thoughts, ask
questions, and engage in academic discourse. Encourage students to actively participate by posing
thoughtful questions, providing timely feedback, and fostering a collaborative learning environment.

Virtual group projects: Assign group projects that require online collaboration. This can involve tasks such
as researching, brainstorming, and presenting findings. By working together online, students can develop
teamwork and communication skills while actively engaging with the course material.

Interactive online assessments: Design assessments that require active participation and critical thinking.
For example, utilize online quizzes with immediate feedback, virtual simulations, or case studies that
prompt students to apply their knowledge and problem-solving abilities.

Implications to Theory & Practice:

The findings of this study contribute to the understanding of the importance of online participation in hybrid
learning environments. It supports the theoretical framework that emphasizes the role of student engagement
in academic achievement. The positive correlation between online participation and final grades provides
empirical evidence that active involvement in online activities positively influences student performance.

From a practical standpoint, these insights can inform instructional design, curriculum development, and
pedagogical approaches aimed at optimizing student engagement and achievement in hybrid learning
settings. Educators can use these findings to create more effective and engaging online learning experiences
by integrating strategies and technologies that promote active participation and interaction among students.
This can lead to improved learning outcomes, increased student satisfaction, and better overall educational
experiences in hybrid learning environments.

D. Point Biserial
The point biserial correlation is a statistical measure used to assess the relationship between a continuous
variable and a dichotomous variable. It is an extension of the Pearson correlation coefficient and is appropriate
when one variable is dichotomous (having two categories) and the other variable is continuous.

The point biserial correlation measures the strength and direction of the linear relationship between a
continuous variable and a dichotomous variable. It assumes that the continuous variable follows a normal
distribution within each group defined by the dichotomous variable. The correlation coefficient ranges from -1
to 1, where a value of -1 indicates a perfect negative relationship, 1 indicates a perfect positive relationship,
and 0 indicates no relationship.

Source: Barbacena, Cherrypyn B. (Copyright 2023) Guide to Quantitative Data Analysis

RESOURCE MATERIALS ARE FOR THIS COURSE USED ONLY & NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION
 REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES
COLLEGE OF INDUSTRIAL EDUCATION
Professional Industrial Education Department
Ayala Boulevard, Manila

The nature of the point biserial correlation is similar to the Pearson correlation coefficient. It quantifies the
linear association between two variables, but specifically focuses on the relationship between a continuous
variable and a dichotomous variable.

Characteristics & Assumptions:

• Linearity: The point biserial correlation assumes that the relationship between the continuous variable and
the dichotomous variable is linear. In other words, the relationship can be represented by a straight line.
• Normality: It assumes that the continuous variable follows a normal distribution within each group defined
by the dichotomous variable. This assumption is important because the point biserial correlation is based
on the calculation of means and standard deviations.
• Homoscedasticity: The variance of the continuous variable is assumed to be constant across the levels of
the dichotomous variable.

Example Research Questions and Hypothesis

Research Question 1: Is there a relationship between student engagement (continuous variable) and the use
of hybrid learning (dichotomous variable)?

Hypothesis 1: Higher levels of student engagement are positively correlated with the use of hybrid learning.

Research Question 2: Does the implementation of hybrid learning (dichotomous variable) have an impact on
student performance (continuous variable)?

Hypothesis 2: Students exposed to hybrid learning show better academic performance compared to those who
experience traditional classroom instruction.

SPSS Applications for Point Biserial Correlation Analysis

Data Preparation: Enter your data in SPSS, ensuring that the continuous variable and dichotomous variable
are appropriately coded.

Analysis: Go to the "Analyze" menu, select "Correlate," and then choose "Bivariate." In the dialog box, select
the continuous variable and the dichotomous variable.

Results: SPSS will generate output that includes the point biserial correlation coefficient, its significance level
(p-value), and other descriptive statistics.

Point Biserial Correlation

Correlation Coefficient
Student Engagement 0.456
(p < 0.001

Source: Barbacena, Cherrypyn B. (Copyright 2023) Guide to Quantitative Data Analysis

RESOURCE MATERIALS ARE FOR THIS COURSE USED ONLY & NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION
 REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES
COLLEGE OF INDUSTRIAL EDUCATION
Professional Industrial Education Department
Ayala Boulevard, Manila

Results, Discussion, Recommendations, and Implications to Theory & Practice:

In the above example, the point biserial correlation coefficient between student engagement and hybrid
learning is 0.456, indicating a positive relationship. The p-value (p < 0.001) suggests that this correlation is
statistically significant, meaning it is unlikely to have occurred by chance alone.

The results indicate that there is a significant positive correlation between student engagement and the use of
hybrid learning. This finding suggests that students who experience hybrid learning tend to have higher levels
of engagement compared to those in traditional classroom settings. This result has implications for educational
theory and practice, highlighting the potential benefits of incorporating hybrid learning approaches. It
underscores the importance of creating engaging and flexible learning environments that leverage technology
and promote active student participation. By embracing hybrid learning, educators can enhance student
engagement, promote effective learning outcomes, and prepare students for the digital age.

Educational Theory:
The finding supports and contributes to educational theories that emphasize the importance of student
engagement in the learning process. According to various theoretical frameworks, including
constructivism and social cognitive theory, active engagement and participation are crucial for effective
learning. Hybrid learning, which combines online and in-person elements, has the potential to enhance
student engagement by providing a more interactive and flexible learning environment. This result
validates the theoretical assumption that hybrid learning can positively impact student engagement.

Educational Practice:
The implication for educational practice is that incorporating hybrid learning approaches can be beneficial
for both educators and students. Here are some practical implications:

a. Flexibility: Hybrid learning allows for greater flexibility in terms of time, location, and pace of learning.
Students can access online materials and resources at their convenience, facilitating personalized and
self-paced learning. This flexibility can accommodate diverse learning styles and individual needs.

b. Active Learning: Hybrid learning encourages active learning strategies such as collaborative activities,
discussions, and interactive online exercises. By incorporating both online and in-person components,
educators can design learning experiences that promote engagement and active participation.

c. Technology Integration: Hybrid learning necessitates the integration of technology tools and platforms.
This integration enhances students' digital literacy skills and prepares them for the demands of the
modern workforce, where technology is increasingly prevalent.

d. Resource Accessibility: Hybrid learning provides students with access to a wider range of resources
beyond traditional classroom materials. Online resources, multimedia content, and interactive simulations
can enrich the learning experience and cater to diverse learning preferences.

e. Individualized Support: Hybrid learning allows for personalized feedback and support. Online platforms
can be utilized for formative assessments, immediate feedback, and individualized instruction, which can
help address students' specific needs and promote their engagement with the learning materials.

Source: Barbacena, Cherrypyn B. (Copyright 2023) Guide to Quantitative Data Analysis

RESOURCE MATERIALS ARE FOR THIS COURSE USED ONLY & NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION
 REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES
COLLEGE OF INDUSTRIAL EDUCATION
Professional Industrial Education Department
Ayala Boulevard, Manila

f. Preparation for the Digital Age: Hybrid learning equips students with digital skills, adaptability, and self-
directed learning abilities, which are essential in today's digital age. By experiencing hybrid learning,
students become more proficient in using technology tools and navigating online resources, preparing
them for future academic and professional endeavors.

Based on the findings of the point biserial correlation analysis, which indicates a positive relationship between
student engagement and hybrid learning, it is recommended that educational institutions consider
implementing hybrid learning models to enhance student engagement. Here is a further elaboration of this
recommendation:

Flexibility: Hybrid learning models offer greater flexibility in terms of time, location, and pace of learning. By
combining online and in-person instruction, students have the flexibility to access course materials and
resources at their own convenience. This flexibility accommodates different learning styles and individual
preferences, allowing students to engage with the content when they are most alert and receptive to learning.

Interactivity: Hybrid learning fosters interactive learning experiences. Online components can incorporate
interactive multimedia resources, virtual simulations, and collaborative platforms that promote active
engagement. In-person sessions can include discussions, group activities, and hands-on experiences. The
combination of online and in-person instruction creates a dynamic learning environment that encourages
students to participate actively, ask questions, and interact with their peers and instructors.

Access to Resources: Hybrid learning provides students with expanded access to a wide range of resources.
Online platforms can host multimedia materials, e-books, scholarly articles, and other relevant resources that
may not be readily available in a traditional classroom setting. This accessibility to diverse resources enhances
the depth and breadth of learning, enabling students to explore topics in greater detail and engage with a
variety of learning materials.

Personalization: Hybrid learning allows for individualized instruction and support. Online components can
incorporate adaptive learning technologies and personalized assessments to tailor the learning experience to
each student's needs. This personalization promotes student engagement by addressing their specific
strengths, weaknesses, and learning preferences. Instructors can also provide timely feedback and guidance
through online platforms, fostering a supportive learning environment.

Enhanced Technology Skills: Implementing hybrid learning models exposes students to various digital tools
and technologies. By engaging with online platforms, students develop proficiency in using technology for
learning purposes. These technological skills are increasingly valuable in today's digital society and prepare
students for future academic and professional endeavors.

Improved Learning Outcomes: The increased flexibility, interactivity, access to resources, and personalization
provided by hybrid learning models have the potential to improve learning outcomes. Engaged students are
more likely to retain information, apply knowledge, and demonstrate higher levels of achievement. By
implementing hybrid learning, educational institutions can create an environment that promotes active learning
and fosters positive learning outcomes.

It is important to note that the implementation of hybrid learning requires careful planning, instructional design,
and ongoing evaluation. Educational institutions should provide appropriate training and support to both
instructors and students to ensure a seamless transition to the hybrid learning environment.

Source: Barbacena, Cherrypyn B. (Copyright 2023) Guide to Quantitative Data Analysis

RESOURCE MATERIALS ARE FOR THIS COURSE USED ONLY & NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION
 REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES
COLLEGE OF INDUSTRIAL EDUCATION
Professional Industrial Education Department
Ayala Boulevard, Manila

In summary, the statement "correlation does not imply causation" emphasizes an important principle in
statistical analysis. While the point biserial correlation analysis may indicate a positive relationship between
hybrid learning and student engagement, it does not automatically imply that hybrid learning causes increased
engagement. Here is a further elaboration of this concept:

Correlation vs. Causation: Correlation refers to the statistical association or relationship between two variables.
It measures the degree to which changes in one variable are related to changes in another variable.
Causation, on the other hand, implies that changes in one variable directly cause changes in another variable.
Establishing causation requires additional evidence beyond a correlation analysis.

Possible Third Variables: The positive correlation observed between hybrid learning and student engagement
could be influenced by other factors, commonly known as confounding variables. These variables may
independently affect both the implementation of hybrid learning and student engagement. Without accounting
for these potential confounders, it is difficult to determine whether the relationship between hybrid learning and
engagement is causal or merely an association.

Reverse Causality: It is also possible that the relationship between hybrid learning and student engagement
operates in the opposite direction. In other words, it could be that students who are more engaged in their
learning are more likely to thrive in a hybrid learning environment. This reverse causality suggests that higher
levels of engagement may lead to a preference for hybrid learning, rather than hybrid learning directly causing
increased engagement.

Other Factors Influencing Student Engagement: Student engagement is a complex construct influenced by
various factors beyond the learning environment itself. Individual student characteristics, instructional
methods, curriculum design, classroom climate, and student motivation are just a few examples of factors that
can impact engagement. It is crucial to consider these additional factors when interpreting the relationship
between hybrid learning and student engagement.

Need for Further Research: To establish a causal relationship between hybrid learning and student
engagement, further research is needed. Experimental designs, such as randomized controlled trials, can help
investigate the effects of hybrid learning while controlling for potential confounding variables. Longitudinal
studies can provide insights into the temporal relationship between hybrid learning and engagement over an
extended period. By conducting rigorous research, we can better understand the mechanisms and conditions
under which hybrid learning influences student engagement.

References:

Kendall, M. G. (1945). Rank correlation methods. Griffin.

Hollander, M., & Wolfe, D. A. (1999). Nonparametric statistical methods. Wiley.
Pallant, J. (2016). SPSS survival manual: A step-by-step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS. McGraw-Hill
Education.
Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Sage Publications.

Source: Barbacena, Cherrypyn B. (Copyright 2023) Guide to Quantitative Data Analysis

RESOURCE MATERIALS ARE FOR THIS COURSE USED ONLY & NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION