Urban - Density - Is - A - Thread - by - Culturaltutor - Nov 20, 23 - From - Rattibha

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 27

The Cultural Tutor

@culturaltutor

21 Tweets • 2023-11-20 •  See on


rattibha.com 

"Urban Density" is a concept which completely


changes how cities feel.

Low Density is more peaceful and has more space


and privacy, but High Density is livelier, walkable, and
creates stronger communities.

Where would you rather live?


Low Density is when you have single family homes,
often with gardens, driveways, and garages, spread
out over a large area of land.

Low Density is also usually single use — there are


houses and nothing else, perhaps with a city centre,
high street, or mall somewhere nearby.
High Density Housing, meanwhile, is when you have
large blocks of apartments clustered together.

High Density is also usually mixed use — there are


shops, schools, commercial, industrial, civic, cultural,
and entertainment places mixed in with the housing.
Density — and the differences between and relative
advantages and disadvantages of Low and High
Density Housing — is one of the most important
concepts in urban design.

Because it can totally change the economics,


community, and culture of a city.

While Low Density Housing has more space, and is


greener and more peaceful, it also tends to produce
atomised communities and an overreliance on cars.

High Density, meanwhile, has less space and is


busier, but is consequently much livelier, walkable,
and convenient.
But the most interesting thing of all is that, at different
times, one of the two has seemed like a more
appropriate way to design cities.

So the question is not simply, "which is better?"

Rather, we should be asking, "what do we need right


now?"

Most medium-sized European cities are now regarded


as ideal.

People want to live there and tourists flock to them.

Think of a city like Bologna in Italy, which receives


nearly three million visitors per year despite having a
population of just 300,000.
And that makes sense.

Cities like Bologna have wonderful architecture, they


are completely walkable, and they are lively: you'll find
cafes, bars, restaurants, bookshops, museums,
galleries, history, and much else going on.

The quality of life here is very high indeed.


But, to people living one or two hundred years ago,
this would be a big surprise.

Because, once upon a time, most of those "charming"


cities — and all city centres, big or small — were
places of industry, squalor, overpopulation, and
disease.
The reason Paris looks like it does today is because,
during the 19th century, they demolished most of the
old Medieval city and replaced it with broad
boulevards and brand new apartments to improve
public health and the general quality of life.

The same happened in Barcelona:


During the Industrial Revolution urban populations
skyrocketed; everybody moved for work.

Thus, even as the factories were being built, the


chimneystacks going up, and the streets shrouded in
smog, tens of thousands of people were cramming
into inadequate, unsanitary housing.
But rebuilding old city centres was expensive,
complicated, and time-consuming.

Thus, as cities became overcrowded, those who could


afford it moved to something called... "the suburbs".

Away from the industry, disease, and crowds of the


city centre — life was better there.
This process was accelerated by the rise of railways,
trams, and metros; when the London Underground
opened in 1863 it forever revolutionised how cities
would be designed.

So the suburbs spread, because people could travel


from ever further away, and this was welcomed.
In the late 19th century public intellectuals like William
Morris dreamed of "garden cities" where people might
live in spacious houses, amid broad streets, good
schools, and clean air.

Once upon a time Low Density Housing was a dream


that sounded too good to be true.
And what trains had started, cars took to its logical
conclusion.

They made it possible for suburbs to be even larger,


and ever more distant from city centres. And with the
rise of cars there came malls and shopping outlets.

Suburbs became Low Density Cities of their own.


This Low Density dream was finally and fully realised
in the decades after WWII, as countries all around the
world started to rebuild and, with growing populations,
expand.

Tower blocks were built in city centres, but the


majority of expansion was in the ever-vaster suburbs.
But now the situation has changed.

That surburban dream has been inverted; it is the High


Density city centre which has — not everywhere, but
in many places — become the location where people
want to live.

Those once-plagued streets have become miniature


urban paradises.
Why?

It's partly because of major economic changes.


Deindustrialisation meant cities were no longer
dominated by factories, power stations, and mills.

Those factories and docklands have become shopping


centres, galleries, and apartments — a sign of
changing times.
Add to deindustrialisation the general improvements in
infrastructure and technology, from heating to
plumbing to electrics, and those formerly squalid city
centres have been transformed into altogether
pleasant places to live.
And, finally, in the Age of the Internet, it may be the
case that people are now craving the sense of
community and identity and liveliness that High
Density urban centres provide.

People see walkable streets as an antidote to the


atomisation caused by social media.
These are not the only options and we don't have to
choose only one of them when we design our cities,
but the question of *how* we should build is eternal.

So what do we need in the 21st century — more Low


Density or more High Density?
These pages were created and arranged by Rattibha
services (https://www.rattibha.com)
The contents of these pages, including all images,
videos, attachments and external links published
(collectively referred to as "this publication"),
were created at the request of a user (s) from X.
Rattibha provides an automated service, without human
intervention, to copy the contents of tweets from X
and publish them in an article style, and create PDF
pages that can be printed and shared, at the request
of X user (s). Please note that the views and all
contents in this publication are those of the author
and do not necessarily represent the views of
Rattibha. Rattibha assumes no responsibility for any
damage or breaches of any law resulting from the
contents of this publication.

You might also like