Scribd
Upload
30 views3 pages

FDD

The document describes the results of three field density tests conducted using the sand replacement method. The tests were performed on two layers, WMM and GSB, at different locations and depths. Details are provided on the wet unit weight determination, in-situ moisture content determination, and degree of compaction calculation.

Uploaded by

Ranjan Chettri
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
30 views3 pages

FDD

The document describes the results of three field density tests conducted using the sand replacement method. The tests were performed on two layers, WMM and GSB, at different locations and depths. Details are provided on the wet unit weight determination, in-situ moisture content determination, and degree of compaction calculation.

Uploaded by

Ranjan Chettri
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

FIELD DENSITY TEST - (By Sand Replacement Method)

Location Date Of testing


Description of Layer WMM
Density of Sand (g/cm2) 1.23 Weight of Sand in cone 2550
Test Frequency 1000 cum

Test Hole 1 2
Location of Test LHS C/C
Depth of Hole 100 100
DETERMINATION OF WET UNIT WEIGHT
Weight of sample from hole (g) A 7825 7565
Wt. of Cylinder filled with sand before pouring (g) B 25000 25000
Wt. of Cylinder filled with sand after pouring (g) C 18323 18450
Wt. of sand in hole (g) D= B-C-A15 4127 4000
Volume of Hole (cm3) E=D/A14 3355.28 3252.03
Weight of Density of sample wet (g/cm3)F=A/E 2.3321 2.3262
DETERMINATION oOF IN- SITU CONTENT (RAPID MOISTURE METHOD)
Dial Dauge reading G 5.95 6
DEGREE OF CAOMPACTION
Lab optimum Moisture Content % I 6.95 6.95
Lab MDD (g/cm3) J 2.228 2.228
FDD (g/cm3) K=F/1+H 2.201 2.195
Degree of Compaction % L=K/1*100 98.80 98.50
Remarks

Contractor Representative Client Representative


FIELD DENSITY TEST - (By Sand Replacement Method)
Location Date Of testing
Description of Layer GSB
Density of Sand (g/cm2) 1.23 Weight of Sand in cone 2550
Test Frequency 1000 cum

Test Hole 1 2
Location of Test LHS C/C
Depth of Hole 100 100
DETERMINATION OF WET UNIT WEIGHT
Weight of sample from hole (g) A 7586 7350
Wt. of Cylinder filled with sand before pouring (g) B 25000 25000
Wt. of Cylinder filled with sand after pouring (g) C 18445 18556
Wt. of sand in hole (g) D= B-C-A15 4005 3894
Volume of Hole (cm3) E=D/A14 3256.10 3165.85
Weight of Density of sample wet (g/cm3)F=A/E 2.3298 2.3216
DETERMINATION oOF IN- SITU CONTENT (RAPID MOISTURE METHOD)
Dial Dauge reading G 6 6.1
DEGREE OF CAOMPACTION
Lab optimum Moisture Content % I 6.95 6.95
Lab MDD (g/cm3) J 2.228 2.228
FDD (g/cm3) K=F/1+H 2.198 2.188
Degree of Compaction % L=K/1*100 98.65 98.21
Remarks

Contractor Representative Client Representative


FIELD DENSITY TEST - (By Sand Replacement Method)
Location Date Of testing
Description of Layer GSB
Density of Sand (g/cm2) 1.23 Weight of Sand in cone 2550
Test Frequency 2000 cum

Test Hole 1 2
Location of Test LHS C/C
Depth of Hole 100 100
DETERMINATION OF WET UNIT WEIGHT
Weight of sample from hole (g) A 7586 7350
Wt. of Cylinder filled with sand before pouring (g) B 25000 25000
Wt. of Cylinder filled with sand after pouring (g) C 18445 18556
Wt. of sand in hole (g) D= B-C-A15 4005 3894
Volume of Hole (cm3) E=D/A14 3256.10 3165.85
Weight of Density of sample wet (g/cm3)F=A/E 2.3298 2.3216
DETERMINATION oOF IN- SITU CONTENT (RAPID MOISTURE METHOD)
Dial Dauge reading G 6 6.1
DEGREE OF CAOMPACTION
Lab optimum Moisture Content % I 6.95 6.95
Lab MDD (g/cm3) J 2.228 2.228
FDD (g/cm3) K=F/1+H 2.198 2.188
Degree of Compaction % L=K/1*100 98.65 98.21
Remarks

Contractor Representative Client Representative

You might also like