Phases of The Application Development Life Cycle Copa
Phases of The Application Development Life Cycle Copa
In this guide, we’ll break down everything you need to know about the system
development life cycle, including all of its stages. We’ll also go over the roles of system
analysts and the benefits your project might see by adopting SDLC.
There are seven primary stages of the modern system development life cycle. Here’s a
brief breakdown:
1
Notes by Mrs. Varsha Sandeep Bharne COPA
Before we even begin with the planning stage, the best tip we can give you is to take
time and acquire a proper understanding of the app development life cycle.
The planning stage (also called the feasibility stage) is exactly what it sounds like the
phase in which developers will plan for the upcoming project.
It helps to define the problem and scope of any existing systems, as well as determine
the objectives for their new systems.
And help to secure the funding and resources they need to make their plan happen.
Perhaps most importantly, the planning stage sets the project schedule, which can be of
key importance if development is for a commercial product that must be sent to market
by a certain time.
The analysis stage includes gathering all the specific details required for a new system
as well as determining the first ideas for prototypes.
Developers may:
This includes all the specifications for software, hardware, and network requirements for
the system they plan to build. This will prevent them from overdrawing funding or
resources when working at the same place as other development teams.
Developers will first outline the details for the overall application, alongside specific
aspects, such as its:
User interfaces
System interfaces
Network and network requirements
Databases
2
Notes by Mrs. Varsha Sandeep Bharne COPA
They’ll typically turn the SRS document they created into a more logical structure that
can later be implemented in a programming language. Operation, training, and
maintenance plans will all be drawn up so that developers know what they need to do
throughout every stage of the cycle moving forward.
The development stage is the part where developers actually write code and build the
application according to the earlier design documents and outlined specifications.
This is where Static Application Security Testing or SAST tools come into play. Product
program code is built per the design document specifications. In theory, all of the prior
planning and outlining should make the actual development phase relatively
straightforward.
Developers will follow any coding guidelines as defined by the organization and utilize
different tools such as compilers, debuggers, and interpreters.
Programming languages can include staples such as C++, PHP, and more. Developers
will choose the right programming code to use based on the project specifications and
requirements.
Building software is not the end. Now it must be tested to make sure that there aren’t
any bugs and that the end-user experience will not negatively be affected at any point.
During the testing stage, developers will go over their software with a fine-tooth comb,
noting any bugs or defects that need to be tracked, fixed, and later retested.
It’s important that the software overall ends up meeting the quality standards that were
previously defined in the SRS document.
Depending on the skill of the developers, the complexity of the software, and the
requirements for the end-user, testing can either be an extremely short phase or take a
very long time. Take a look at our top 10 best practices for software testing projects for
more information.
After testing, the overall design for the software will come together. Different modules or
designs will be integrated into the primary source code through developer efforts,
usually by leveraging training environments to detect further errors or defects.
The information system will be integrated into its environment and eventually installed.
After passing this stage, the software is theoretically ready for market and may be
provided to any end-users.
3
Notes by Mrs. Varsha Sandeep Bharne COPA
The SDLC doesn’t end when software reaches the market. Developers must now move
into maintenance mode and begin practicing any activities required to handle issues
reported by end-users.
Furthermore, developers are responsible for implementing any changes that the
software might need after deployment.
This can include handling residual bugs that were not able to be patched before launch
or resolving new issues that crop up due to user reports. Larger systems may require
longer maintenance stages compared to smaller systems.
An SDLC’s system analyst is, in some ways, an overseer for the entire system. They
should be totally aware of the system and all its moving parts and can help guide the
project by giving appropriate directions.
Their responsibilities are quite diverse and important for the eventual success of a given
project. Systems analysts will often be expected to:
Although the system development life cycle is a project management model in the broad
sense, six more specific methodologies can be leveraged to achieve specific results or
provide a greater SDLC with different attributes.
4
Notes by Mrs. Varsha Sandeep Bharne COPA
Waterfall Model
The waterfall model is the oldest of all SDLC methodologies. It’s linear and
straightforward and requires development teams to finish one phase of the project
completely before moving on to the next.
Each stage has a separate project plan and takes information from the previous stage
to avoid similar issues (if encountered). However, it is vulnerable to early delays and
can lead to big problems arising for development teams later down the road.
Iterative Model
The iterative model focuses on repetition and repeat testing. New versions of a software
project are produced at the end of each phase to catch potential errors and allow
developers to constantly improve the end product by the time it is ready for market.
One of the upsides to this model is that developers can create a working version of the
project relatively early in their development life cycle, so implementing the changes is
often less expensive.
Spiral Model
Spiral models are flexible compared to other methodologies. Projects pass through four
main phases again and again in a metaphorically spiral motion.
It’s advantageous for large projects since development teams can create very
customized products and incorporate any received feedback relatively early in the life
cycle.
5
Notes by Mrs. Varsha Sandeep Bharne COPA
V-Model
The V-model (which is short for verification and validation) is quite similar to the
waterfall model. A testing phase is incorporated into each development stage to catch
potential bugs and defects.
It’s incredibly disciplined and requires a rigorous timeline. But in theory, it illuminates the
shortcomings of the main waterfall model by preventing larger bugs from spiraling out of
control.
The Big Bang model is incredibly flexible and doesn’t follow a rigorous process or
procedure. It even leaves detailed planning behind. It’s mostly used to develop broad
ideas when the customer or client isn’t sure what they want. Developers simply start the
project with money and resources.
Their output may be closer or farther from what the client eventually realizes they
desire. It’s mostly used for smaller projects and experimental life cycles designed to
inform other projects in the same company.
Agile Model
The agile methodology prioritizes fast and ongoing release cycles, utilizing small but
incremental changes between releases. This results in more iterations and many more
tests compared to other models.
Theoretically, this model helps teams to address small issues as they arise rather than
missing them until later, more complex stages of a project.
Developers clearly know the goals they need to meet and the deliverables they must
achieve by a set timeline, lowering the risk of time and resources being wasted.
SDLC models implement checks and balances to ensure that all software is tested
before being installed in greater source code.
6
Notes by Mrs. Varsha Sandeep Bharne COPA
Developers can’t move on to the next age until the prior one is completed and signed off
by a manager.
Member Flexibility
Since SDLCs have well-structured documents for project goals and methodologies,
team members can leave and be replaced by new members relatively painlessly.
Perfection Is Achievable
All SDLC stages are meant to feed back into one another. SDLC models can therefore
help projects to iterate and improve upon themselves over and over until essentially
perfect.
Again, since SDLCs utilize extensive paperwork and guideline documents, it’s a team
effort, and losing one even a major member will not jeopardize the project timeline.
System development life cycles are typically used when developing IT projects.
Software development managers will utilize SDLCs to outline various development
stages, make sure everyone completes stages on time and in the correct order, and that
the project is delivered as promptly and as bug-free as possible.
SDLCs can also be more specifically used by systems analysts as they develop and
later implement a new information system.
It largely depends on what your team’s goals and resource requirements are. The
majority of IT development teams utilize the agile methodology for their SDLC.
However, others may prefer the iterative or spiral methodologies.
All three of these methods are popular since they allow for extensive iteration and bug
testing before a product is integrated with greater source code or delivered to the
market.
DevOps methodologies are also popular choices. And if you ever need a refresher
course on what is DevOps, you needn’t worry as our team at CloudDefense.AI has got
you covered!
7
Notes by Mrs. Varsha Sandeep Bharne COPA
SDLC can be used to develop or engineer software, systems, and even information
systems. It can also be used to develop hardware or a combination of both software and
hardware at the same time.
FAQs
The systems development life cycle originally consisted of five stages instead of seven.
These included planning, creating, developing, testing, and deploying. Note that it left
out the major stages of analysis and maintenance.
The new seven phases of SDLC include planning, analysis, design, development,
testing, implementation, and maintenance.
Conclusion
Ultimately, any development team in both the IT and other industries can benefit from
implementing system development life cycles into their projects. Use the above guide to
identify which methodology you want to use in conjunction with your SDLC for the best
results.