Platform Tembunga A - Gas Engine Gen
Platform Tembunga A - Gas Engine Gen
Platform Tembunga A - Gas Engine Gen
2. EQUIPMENT USED
3.1 The sixteen cylinder Caterpillar engine drives the two bearing generator at 1200
rpm through a flexible coupling.
3.3 The maximum no load vibrations at the test bench in workshop was 3.45 mm/sec
rms.
3.4 After carrying out dial gauge alignment the machine was loaded to the normal
maximum load of 300 KW. It was observed that the vibrations at the generator
bearings ( both drive end & non drive end ) was found reaching magnitudes upto
19.83 mm/sec .
3.5 As a trouble shooting measure the spark plugs of few cylinders were replaced
based on the electronic ignition CPU monitoring system readings. After this
change the vibration reduced to 11 mm/sec. Based on the reduction all the spark
plugs were replaced. After replacement the vibrations reduced to about 9.7
mm/sec. The machine was kept in operation.
4.1. The vibrations were recorded in the three principal directions at the Generator
and Engine Front ,rear bearing positions. Vibration amplitudes in velocity
mm/sec (rms) was used as the basis of measure and vibration readings were
recorded in the frequency range of 0-500 Hz.
4.2. In addition to spectrums, phase analysis & order tracking analysis was carried
out.
4.3. The vibration data was collected at idle speed, normal rated speed, 100 KW
load, 200 KW load and finally at 300 KW load. Vibration and operation data were
recorded during this process.
4.4. Finally hot alignment, cold alignment, soft foot checks and corrections were
made using the laser alignment system which adopts the reverse indicator
method.
5. OBSERVATIONS
5.1. The initial vibrations recorded on 08/01/03 showed a maximum reading of about
9.6 mm/sec at the generator bearings in the drive end as well as non drive end.
The spectrum at these locations showed a dominant component at 1x rpm. The
tbgA - GAS GENERATOR-300 KW
G500-300 -A1A ALTERNATOR DE AXIAL
spectrum at the 7
Route Spectrum
08-JAN-03 17:17:00
engine and R
6 OVRALL= 7.34 V-DG
RMS = 7.33
M LOAD = 100.0
other locations S 5 RPM = 1210.
RPS = 20.17
Ve
loc
showed the ity
4
in
presence of m
m/
Se 3
sub harmonic c
2
(0.5x,1.5x…) and
their orders which 1
is typical pattern in 0
Ordr: 2.510
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Freq: 50.63
engines . The Frequency in Order Spec: 5.283
10
8
A1H
A2H
6
A1A
A2A
4
0
ZERO LOAD 100 KW 200 KW 300 KW FULL LOAD
AFTER
ALIGNMENT
5.6. The table below provides the data observed from no load to full load condition.
Point Location Zero load 100 KW load 200 KW 300 KW load After alignment (
Load 300 KW load)
E1V 5.765 10.44 7.339 7.8 6.045
E1H 2.526 2.389 3.003 3.297 3.249
E1A 2.706 1.999 3.403 4.56 4.746
E2V 5.528 3.403 3.776 4.162 4.086
E2H 5.082 4.56 4.028 4.428 6.032
E2A 2.764 2.146 3.212 4.076 3.659
A1V 3.379 2.633 3.583 4.679 4.028
A1H 4.419 6.399 8.677 10.29 9.656
A1A 3.055 2.95 4.181 6.942 6.399
A2V 2.778 2.009 3.285 4.481 2.813
A2H 4.274 5.369 8.306 9.119 9.05
A2A 3.022 2.937 4.124 7.467 6.712
5.7. The graph below shows the same data in graph format.
12
ZERO LOAD
10
8 100 KW
6
200 KW
4
2 300 KW
0
FULL LOAD AFTER
5.8. The alignment readings were taken in hot as well as cold condition . The hot
alignment readings were :
The offset reading was decreasing with decrease in temperature indicating the cold
alignment offset was not present. The cold alignment reading before correction was:
Vertical offset -0.0011”
Vertical face gap 0.0014“
Horizontal Offset 0.0006”
Horizontal Gap 0.0043”
5.9. Soft foot check showed that the maximum deflection was 0.06 mm at the front
left foot, as it was 0.02 mm at other feet.
5.10. Based on the desired offset 0.012” shims were added in the front foots and
0.021” shims were added at the rear foot.
5.12. The machine was put on load and there was no major improvement in vibrations
observed so the unit was stopped and the hot alignment rechecked. The
readings observed were
Vertical offset -0.0041”
Vertical face gap -0.0053“
Horizontal Offset 0.0008”
Horizontal Gap 0.0006”
The absence of any high frequency components in the spectrum at the alternator
indicates absence of any bearing faults. The normal vibrations level at 1200 rpm
no load condition and steady phase during loading indicate absence of lateral
resonance condition. At no load condition indicates that unbalance in the rotor is
not a cause of high vibration. The in phase readings between drive end and non
drive end bearing rules out the possibility of casing distortion or bent rotor .
The high horizontal vibrations with dominant 1x and a minor 4x coupled with the
phase difference between engine and alternator, indicates possibility of
misalignment. This was confirmed by the offset observed during the hot
alignment check the first and second time. This coupled with the damage of the
rubber insert could escalate the problem. The damage in the rubber could be the
cause of the abnormal alignment readings observed.The other major source of
the problem could the speed fluctuation and unbalanced firing in the cylinder
which can create torsional pulsation’s having a cross effect in lateral vibrations.
This has been proved by the fact that by changing the spark plugs the vibration
levels reduced.
However the present vibrations are well within the normal acceptable range for
this category of machines which permit levels as high as 20 mm/sec at the
alternator bearings. So steady state operation at this level should not a cause of
concern. Kindly refer to attachment 2 for the standards on vibration limits. Further
improvement could be achieved by replacing the coupling rubber and providing
the right cold offset so that we can achieve good hot alignment
readings.Improvement in engine operating conditions would also provide more
stable vibration levels, which are fluctuating now.