1

Institutions

Agustin Canonico

San Ignacio University

MA50700: Global Business Strategic Management

Dr. Orlando Ojeda

January 18, 2024

Table of Contents
Institutions..............................................................................................................................1
Introduction............................................................................................................................3
Reducing Uncertainty: The Scaffolding of Rules....................................................................4
Opportunism in the Shadows: Friend or Foe?........................................................................5
Democracies and Dictatorships: Weighing the Risks and Rewards..........................................6
Understanding the Terrain: The Value of Formal Institutions................................................7
Conclusion..............................................................................................................................7
References..............................................................................................................................9
3

Introduction

The world presents itself as a complex stage, where individuals and entities play various

games. The success of these endeavors often hinges on the "rules of the game," those formal and

informal institutions that dictate behavior, expectations, and consequences. This paper delves

into the interplay between these rules, uncertainty, opportunism, and the intricacies of

international expansion. The global stage serves as a multifaceted arena where individuals and

entities engage in various games, with the success of these endeavors often contingent on the

nuanced interplay between formal and informal institutions—the rules that govern behavior, set

expectations, and define consequences. This paper delves into the intricate dynamics of

international expansion, exploring the relationship between these rules, uncertainty,

opportunism, and the pivotal role they play in shaping the outcomes of diverse undertakings.

In the realm of reducing uncertainty, the establishment of well-defined rules emerges as a

paramount factor. Formal institutions, such as laws and constitutions, serve as a scaffolding that

significantly mitigates the impact of uncertainty. By providing a predictable framework for

interactions, they navigate complexities, minimize confusion, and foster trust. This predictability,

exemplified in clear property rights and robust legal systems, not only incentivizes

entrepreneurship but also promotes long-term planning and investment, thereby fostering

economic growth and societal stability. However, the effectiveness of these rules extends beyond

their clarity to encompass their legitimacy, wherein informal institutions like social norms and

cultural values play a pivotal role in reinforcing and promoting compliance, particularly in the

absence of robust formal structures.

Yet, the paradox of rules lies in their potential to stimulate opportunism, as defining

boundaries may create spaces for actors to exploit loopholes or bend the rules to their advantage.

This opportunism, while disruptive and capable of undermining stability and fairness, can also

act as a catalyst for innovation and progress. The paper explores how the impact of opportunism

hinges on context and the effectiveness of mechanisms in place to curb its excesses.

Furthermore, the essay delves into the strategic considerations of businesses expanding

into new markets, weighing the risks and rewards associated with democracies and totalitarian

regimes. Democracies, with their emphasis on transparency and the rule of law, offer stability

and protection of property rights but come with challenges such as bureaucratic complexity and

political instability. In contrast, totalitarian regimes may promise streamlined decision-making

but pose risks due to the lack of rule of law and transparency. The optimal choice between these

markets depends on a company's risk tolerance, industry, and long-term goals.

In navigating this complex terrain, the paper underscores the importance of understanding

formal institutions—the legal systems, regulatory frameworks, and administrative procedures

that shape the operating environment for businesses. Using the example of a pharmaceutical

company expanding into a developing country, the essay illustrates how a comprehensive grasp

of formal institutions is essential for market access, compliance with regulations, and ultimately,

the success of the venture.

Reducing Uncertainty: The Scaffolding of Rules

Uncertainty is an inherent feature of any endeavor, but the presence of well-defined rules

can significantly mitigate its impact. Formal institutions, such as laws and constitutions, provide
5

a predictable framework for navigating interactions, minimizing confusion, and fostering trust.

Clear property rights, for instance, incentivize entrepreneurship by reducing the risk of arbitrary

confiscation (North, 1990). Similarly, robust legal systems offer avenues for dispute resolution,

alleviating anxieties about unfair advantage. This predictability facilitates long-term planning

and investment, fostering economic growth and societal stability (Acemoglu & Robinson, 2012).

However, the effectiveness of rules hinges not only on their clarity but also on their

legitimacy. Informal institutions, like social norms and cultural values, can reinforce formal rules

and promote compliance (Ostrom, 2000). In situations where formal institutions are weak or

absent, strong social norms can provide a substitute framework for cooperation and order.

Conversely, weak, or conflicting institutional frameworks can fuel uncertainty, creating fertile

ground for corruption and instability (Levi-Faur, 2005).

Opportunism in the Shadows: Friend or Foe?

Rules, while intended to minimize opportunism, can paradoxically create incentives for

its emergence. The very act of defining boundaries creates spaces where actors may seek to

exploit loopholes or bend the rules to their advantage. In such instances, opportunism can act as a

disruptive force, undermining the stability and fairness of the system. Rent-seeking behavior,

where individuals or groups manipulate rules for personal gain, is a prime example (Krueger,

1974).

However, opportunism can also be a catalyst for innovation and progress. When rules

allow for flexibility and adaptation, individuals may creatively explore opportunities within the

boundaries, leading to new ideas and solutions. Entrepreneurial ventures often thrive on this

ability to identify and capitalize on unmet needs within existing systems. Ultimately, the impact
6

of opportunism depends on the context and the effectiveness of mechanisms in place to check its

excesses (Williamson, 1985).

Democracies and Dictatorships: Weighing the Risks and Rewards

Expanding into new markets presents exciting opportunities for businesses, but

navigating unfamiliar institutional landscapes brings its own set of challenges. Democracies and

totalitarian regimes offer distinct landscapes, each with its advantages and disadvantages.

Democracies, with their focus on transparency, the rule of law, and citizen participation,

offer a predictable and stable environment for businesses. Strong legal systems protect property

rights and enforce contracts, while democratic processes minimize the risk of arbitrary

government intervention. Access to a large and educated workforce, coupled with a vibrant

consumer market, further enhances the appeal of democracies (Dollar & Pritchett, 2014).

However, democracies can also present challenges. Bureaucratic complexity, political

instability, and short-term policy horizons can pose hurdles for businesses. Additionally, labor

regulations and environmental protections, while beneficial in the long run, can increase

operational costs in the short term.

Totalitarian regimes, on the other hand, offer the allure of streamlined decision-making

and lower operating costs. Strong centralized control can expedite approvals and provide access

to government contracts and resources. However, the lack of rule of law and transparency creates

significant risks. Arbitrary changes in policy, expropriation of assets, and human rights

violations can pose serious threats to businesses operating in such environments (Djankov et al.,

2003).
7

Ultimately, the optimal choice between a democratic or totalitarian market depends on a

company’s risk tolerance, industry, and long-term goals. While democracies offer greater

stability and potential for growth, the immediate hurdles can be daunting. Totalitarian regimes

may offer easier entry points, but the inherent instability and ethical concerns present long-term

risks.

Understanding the Terrain: The Value of Formal Institutions

Entering a new market without a thorough understanding of its formal institutions is akin

to playing a game with unknown rules. Formal institutions, including legal systems, regulatory

frameworks, and administrative procedures, shape the operating environment for businesses. A

company’s ability to navigate these complexities can significantly impact its success or failure.

Consider the example of a pharmaceutical company seeking to expand into a developing

country. Understanding the drug registration process, patent protection laws, and pricing

regulations is crucial for securing market access and avoiding costly delays. Failure to comply

with local environmental regulations, labor laws, or anti-corruption policies can result in fines,

reputational damage, and even forced closure.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this paper has traversed the intricate landscape of international expansion,

shedding light on the critical role played by the "rules of the game" formal and informal

institutions in shaping the outcomes of diverse endeavors. The exploration of reducing

uncertainty underscored the pivotal role of well-defined rules, particularly formal institutions
8

such as laws and constitutions, in mitigating the inherent uncertainties of any venture. The

scaffolding effect of these rules was highlighted, emphasizing their ability to provide a

predictable framework, incentivize entrepreneurship, and foster long-term planning and

investment.

The discussion on opportunism illuminated the paradoxical nature of rules, which, while

intended to minimize opportunistic behavior, may inadvertently create incentives for its

emergence. The paper recognized opportunism as a disruptive force but also acknowledged its

potential as a catalyst for innovation and progress, contingent upon contextual factors and the

effectiveness of mechanisms in place to curb excesses.

The strategic considerations of businesses expanding into new markets delved into the

risks and rewards associated with democracies and totalitarian regimes. The analysis weighed the

stability and transparency offered by democracies against the streamlined decision-making but

inherent risks of totalitarian regimes. The conclusion emphasized the importance of aligning the

choice between these market types with a company's risk tolerance, industry specifics, and long-

term goals.

Lastly, the value of formal institutions in understanding the terrain of a new market was

emphasized. The essay illustrated how a thorough grasp of legal systems, regulatory frameworks,

and administrative procedures is akin to knowing the rules of the game before entering, using the

example of a pharmaceutical company expanding into a developing country.

In essence, this paper serves as a comprehensive exploration of the dynamic interplay

between rules, uncertainty, opportunism, and the complexities of international expansion,

offering valuable insights for businesses navigating the multifaceted global stage.
9

References

Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2012). Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity, and

poverty. Crown Business.

Djankov, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2003). Courts. The Quarterly

Journal of Economics, 118(2), 453-517.

Dollar, D., & Pritchett, L. (2014). Development success: Why it happens, why it doesn't, and

what to do about it. World Bank Publications.

Krueger, A. O. (1974). The political economy of the rent-seeking society. American Economic

Review, 64(3), 291-303.

Levi-Faur, D. (2005). The global diffusion of regulatory capitalism: Theorizing the role of the

state. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 598(1), 12-32.

North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge

University Press.

Ostrom, E. (2000). Collective action and the evolution of social norms. Journal of Economic

Perspectives, 14(3), 137-158.

Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism. Free Press.