Ethiopia Nigussie Revised Case Study

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 12

Country: Ethiopia

Authors: Aklilu Nigussie1, Adem Kedir2, Getnet Belay2, Abiy Addisu2, Kidane2
Desalegn and Birhanu Megersa2

Institution: Ethiopian Institutes of Agricultural Research, Werer Agricultural


Research Center, Department of Agricultural Economics, Extension and Gender
Research, P.O.Box 2003 Addis Ababa Ethiopian

Email: [email protected]

Website: www.eiar.gov.et

Type of livestock produced: Chicken Bird koekoek breed

Site of Farm: Afar agro-pastoral communities

Number of Animals on farm: at back yard stage 25 koekoek per household

Years of operation: 2013

Title: Popularization of Chicken Production in Smallholder Women Agro-


pastoralist of Ethiopia: Case of Afar Regional State

1. INTRODUCTION

Ethiopian chicken population is about 39.5 million (CSA, 2008) million.


Although Ethiopia has a huge resource of poultry, the country is not getting
the required benefits from this sector. Reasons for this are poor productivity
of local hens and cocks, the production is not well developed to full fill the
demands, high disease prevalence for both exotic and local birds (Tadesse,
2000; Alemu, 1987).

Popularization of Chicken Production in Smallholder Women Agro-pastoralist of Ethiopia: Case of Afar Regional State 
In Ethiopia, chicken are widespread and almost every rural family owns
chicken, which provide a valuable source of family protein and income
(Tadelle et al. 2003a). The majority (99%) of these chickens maintained
under a traditional system with little or no input four housing, feeding or
health care. Rural chicken in Ethiopia represents a significant part of the
national economy in general and the rural economy in particular and
contribute to 98.5% to 99.2% of the national egg and chicken meat
production, respectively (Tadelle 1996; Aberra 2000). However, the
economic contribution of the sector is still not proportional to the huge
chicken numbers, attribute to the presence of many technical, organizational
and institutional constraints.

Commercialization of subsistence agriculture is an indispensable pathway


towards economic growth and development for many agriculture dependent
developing countries (von Braun 1994; Pingali and Rosegrant 1995).
Sustainable household food security and welfare also requires commercial
transformation of subsistence agriculture (Pingali 1997). Commercialization
agriculture production is likely to result in welfare gain through the
realization of smallholder women, advantages, economies of scale, and for
dynamic technological, organizational and institutional change effect that
arise the flow of ideas due to exchange based interactions. Commercialization
enhances the links between the input and output side of agricultural market
furthermore, changes in the livelihood of the agro-pastoral in consideration of
this project.

Animal production in general and chicken production in particular play


important socio-economic role in developing countries (Kondombo 2005).
According to Sonaiya (2004), smallholder farming families, land less laborers
and people with low incomes below the poverty line are able to raise chicken
with low inputs and harvest the benefit of eggs and meat via scavenging feed

Popularization of Chicken Production in Smallholder Women Agro-pastoralist of Ethiopia: Case of Afar Regional State 
resources. The proportional contribution of poultry to the total animal protein
production of the world by the year 2020 believed to increase 40%, the major
increase being in the developing world (Delgado et al. 1999). However, most
communities lack the required husbandry skill; training and opportunity
effectively improve their household chicken production (Mlozi et al. 2003).

Chickens are among the most adaptable domestic animals and more people
are directly involved in production throughout the world (in Ethiopian case
too) than any other agricultural enterprise. The impact of village chicken in
the national economy of developing countries and its role in improving the
nutritional status, income, food security and livelihood of many smallholders
is significant owing to its low cost of production (FAO 1997; Abdelqader
2007; Abubekar et al. 2007).

Chicken provide major opportunity to increase protein production and


incomes for the smallholder farmers because of short generation interval,
high rate of productivity, the ease with which its product can be supplied to
different areas, the ease with which its product can be sold due to their
relatively low economic values, its minimal associations with high cost of
transportation.

Livestock Operation and Impact


From the total sample taken in Amibara 85.6% sales egg once in a week at
Saturday market day while 85.4% sales in Afambo respectively. the sale in
daily bases are very small since there is no market at each day (Table 1). The
price of egg in the area in Ethiopian Birr costs 2.75 at the weekly market
while in door marketing it might escalated to 2.95.

Popularization of Chicken Production in Smallholder Women Agro-pastoralist of Ethiopia: Case of Afar Regional State 
Table 1: Frequency of Egg sales
Activities Sample area
Amibar Afambo
Frequency of sale egg
Once in a week 85.6 85.4
Twice in a week 12.2 12.5
Daily 2.2 2.1
Source: survey data computed, 2013

Challenges faced
 Infrastructural development for the agro-pastoral communities like
access to electric power and transportation

 Financial limitation in research and development to reach the


intervention to number of societies

 limitation in research facilities like laboratories and training

Solutions Tasted
 For agro-pastorals to use ventilated house for the chicken birds that
can be easily made from the available materials using plastics, wood
and iron sheets

 agro-pastoral have to walk to the market in shift based to supply all


the neighborhood egg

 Apply for external funds like ASARECA, PRIME and others for
financial and infrastructural development

Popularization of Chicken Production in Smallholder Women Agro-pastoralist of Ethiopia: Case of Afar Regional State 
Impact generated

The household chicken bird owners characteristic presented from Table 1 to


Table 2. From the total interviewed household participated in the
popularization activities 92.4 and 81.9% are women in Amibara and Afambo
Woredas, respectively. The average age of the respondents is 42.9 year in
Amibara and 39.8 year in Afambo. The overall family size of the sample
households is 6.4 in Amibara and 5.9 in Afambo districts, which is higher
than the national average of 5.2 persons (CSA 2007). However, this is similar
to the finding of (Asefa 2007) who reported 7 person per household for the
Awassa Zuria Woreda in the SNNPR.

Table 2: Socio-economic status of koekoek owners in the district


Variables Amibar Afambo
Sex of respondent households (%)
Man 7.6 18.1
Women 92.4 81.9
Average age of the respondents (year) 42.9 39.8
Average family size /hh (mean 6.35 5.88
Source: survey data computed, 2013

As stated in Table 3 91.1% of the households have access to information about the
egg market price in Amibar district where the 42% of the information in channeled
from other suppliers in the area. While in Afambo 68.8% of the households have
market information where most of the information comes from the buyers.

Popularization of Chicken Production in Smallholder Women Agro-pastoralist of Ethiopia: Case of Afar Regional State 
Table 3: Market information for chicken bird and egg
Activities Sample area
Amibar Afambo
Access to market information of egg
Yes 91.1 68.8
No 8.9 31.3
Source of market information
Other producers 42.0 31.3
Development agents 23.6 0.0
Buyers 14.0 35.4
Relatives 11.6
Source: survey data computed, 2013

Poultry housing system and facilities

The results of poultry housing and facilities assessment are presented in


Table 4. The highest proportion of the respondents, 80% in Amibara and 68%
in Afambo districts, constructed a separate house entirely for poultry. No
respondent in Afambo and 4.0% in Amibara districts kept their chicken birds
with other animals. In both districts, only 22% of the respondents share the
same house with their chicken.

Table 4: housing system and facilities


housing system and facilities Districts
Poultry Housing system Amibara Afambo Cumulative
N=25 N=25 N=50
Frequency % Frequency % Frequency %
Separate house 21 80.0 17 68.0 38 76.0
Share with people 3 12.0 8 32.0 11 22.0
Share with other livestock 1 4.0 0.0 0.0 1 2.0
Housing facilities
With electric city 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Adequate ventilation facility 20 80.0 23 92.0 43 86.0
Litter material used 5 20.0 2 8.0 7 14.0
Source: survey data computed, 2013

Popularization of Chicken Production in Smallholder Women Agro-pastoralist of Ethiopia: Case of Afar Regional State 
There was no any household who have electricity in poultry house in both
sample districts. Adequate ventilation facilities in poultry house were
provided by 100% and 92% in Amibara and Afambo districts, respectively.
Only 20% and 8% of the respondents in Amibara and Afambo districts,
respectively, used litter for rearing chicken.

Estimated Yield

Egg production

Information on egg production performance of significant difference (p<0.05)


among Koekoek on average number of eggs laid under village production
system.

Table 5:Mean annual egg production of the breed


Chicken Bird N Number of eggs laid/ hen/year
Koekoek 50 Mean SD
189.23 14.56
Source: survey data computed, 2013

Management Practices

The Koekoek was bred from crosses between the Black Australorp and the
White Leghorn and is recognized as a locally South African developed breed.
These birds reach sexual maturity at 130 days. They have a characteristic
black and white speckled color pattern, also described as barred, which is
present in as many as nine different poultry breeds. The kook inherited the
bar gene, a sex linked gene and they are easily distinguished, having light
grey bars on the feathers, while the hen are darker (Van Marle-Koster and

Popularization of Chicken Production in Smallholder Women Agro-pastoralist of Ethiopia: Case of Afar Regional State 
Nel, 2000).The average egg weight is 55.7g and the color of the eggs is
brown (Ramsey et al., 2000).

Feeds and feeding practices

In both districts, 97.8% of the respondents were using scavenging with


additional supplements and only 2.2% used only scavenging with no
additional feed supplements for chicken (Table 6). 3.4% respondents in
Amibara and 2.3% respondents in Afambo district were using purchased
commercial feeds.

Table 6: Poultry feeds and feeding practices in percentage


Feeding practices District Cumulative
Amibara N=25 Afambo N=25 N=50
Only scavenging 2.2 2.2 2.2
Scavenging and additional 97.8 97.8 97.8
supplement
Purchased feed 3.4 2.3 2.8
Additional feed type
Wheat and maize 96.6 97.7 97.2
Kitchen waste 100 100 100
Crop barns 3.3 3.3 3.3
Frequency of feeding

Three times a day 81.1 76.7 78.9


Two times a day 18.9 23.3 21.1
Source: survey data computed, 2013

All respondents provide kitchen waste as supplement in both districts.


Approximately, 97% of the respondents provide maize and wheat as
additional supplements, while, 3.3% and 3.3% used crop bran as supplement
in Amibara and Afambo districts, respectively. Regarding frequency of

Popularization of Chicken Production in Smallholder Women Agro-pastoralist of Ethiopia: Case of Afar Regional State 
feeding, 81.1% and 76.7% of the respondents in Amibara and Afambo
districts, feed their chicken three times per day respectively, while 18.9% and
23.3% provide two times per day in the same order.

Key Stakeholders: Afar regional pastoral and agro-pastoral office,


Amibara worda pastoral and agro-pastoral office, Afambo woreda pastoral
and agro-pastoral office, the agro-pastoral communities and Debrezeit
research center.

Lesson learned and next steps


 Women agro-pastoral communities will be more productive if they
engaged in back yard chicken bird production

 Koekoek breed is adaptable to the semi-arid and arid districts of agro-


pastoral communities in Afar regional districts

 Poultry production at small scale level will create an opportunity for


women access and control to resource

 Poultry production has contribution to families nutrition and as it is


production system confined in specific area especially at back yard
level it will no created over grazing or other environmental factors

 Poultry product can generate income in a sustainable manner and can


create an opportunity stabilize markets

 If there is a possibility to access stakeholders fund for the project to


reach other agro-pastoral communities and create an impact in
livelihood of producer with availing the technology and contribute
for food security, nutrition and create a market linkage
Popularization of Chicken Production in Smallholder Women Agro-pastoralist of Ethiopia: Case of Afar Regional State 
Figure 1: Women koekoek popularization site

Popularization of Chicken Production in Smallholder Women Agro-pastoralist of Ethiopia: Case of Afar Regional State  


Figure 2: an agro-pastoral women with her hausband feeding Koekoek

Popularization of Chicken Production in Smallholder Women Agro-pastoralist of Ethiopia: Case of Afar Regional State  


Figure 3: Field day


Figure 4: Women giving supplementary feed

Popularization of Chicken Production in Smallholder Women Agro-pastoralist of Ethiopia: Case of Afar Regional State  


You might also like