0% found this document useful (0 votes)
17 views30 pages

Final Exam Practice

Uploaded by

nekojot576
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
17 views30 pages

Final Exam Practice

Uploaded by

nekojot576
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 30

Q

F1 F2 F3
Tablet A 30 40 15 F1
Tablet B 20 5 5 F2
Tablet C 3 4 10 F3

C
40
50
35 -5525
Q*C
3725 3725
1225
670
QT
Tablet A Tablet B Tablet C
30 20 3
40 5 4
15 5 10

QT*C
2305 2305
1990
1200

QT*C has economic sense since you get


the total costs of each factory because
you multiply each tablet with its cost
3 Multiplying the coef. Array times its inverse = identity Matrix

coef. X coef -1 #NAME? #NAME? #NAME?


#NAME? #NAME? #NAME?
#NAME? #NAME? #NAME?
4
to get the x y and z values, determinants of X, Y, Z have to be calculated. Then deviding those by the determinant of
C
2 1 1
6 5 -3
4 -1 3

|C|= -32

C-1
-0.375 0.125
0.9375 -0.0625
0.8125 -0.1875

12 1
x 6 5
5 -1

2 12
ding those by the determinant of the coefficient Matrix y 6 6
4 5

2 1
z 6 5
4 -1
A B
x 12
* y = 6
z 5

C-1 B A
0.25 12 -2.5
-0.375 * 6 = 9
-0.125 5 8

determinants A
1
-3 80 -2.5
3

1
-3 -288 9
3

12
6 -256 8
5
Q
QL
QK
24L2+6K2
48L MRTS=
12K
L K Q
8.71779378 26 5879.99828

6869.99828
K constant
5880 -288

5592

2 units have to be added

48L MRTS =
12K
-1.341199043

L K Q
8.71779378 26 5879.99828

K constant
5880 360

Variation 1.72 -> 2


QL Qk
418.454102 312

L constant
989.998282

-1.34119904
QL QK
418.454102 312

L constant
342

*
L(x,y,^) = 2xy+3x (90-x-2y)
Law of dminishing returns

L(x,y,λ)= 2xy+3x+λ(95-x-2y)
L(x,y,λ)= 2xy+3x+λ(95-x-2y)
U = 2xy + 3x

x+2y = 95
X 49 λ
Y 23

TARGET 2401

constraint 95 = 95
x 49 λ 1
y 23

target 2401

constraint 95 = 95
12
5
2
1
1
0
L(x,y,λ)= 2xy+3x+λ(94-x-2y)
U = 2xy + 3x
x 48.5
x+2y = 94 y 22.75

target 2352.25

constraint 94 = 94

L(x,y,λ)= 2xy+3x+λ(95-x-2y)
U = 2xy + 3x

x 48.50 λ 49
y 22.75

target 2352.25
constraint 94 = 94
welding finishing administration
gate x 6 2 1
gate y 2 1 1
gate z 3 1 1.5
maximum hours 840 300 250
hours used 840 280 250

constraints

number of gates integrer


K9 <= K8
L9<=L8
M8<= M9
gate z number <= 20
profit number of gates
55 85
25 0
60 110

total profit 11275

nrew profit 8750


HOURS USED
welding finishing administration profit/u
gate x 6 2 1 55
gate y 2 1 1 25
gate z 3 1 1.5 60
maximum hrs 840 300 250
hours used 840 280 250

TOTAL PROFI
* NEW PROFIT=
1. Target: maximize total profit
2. Changing variables: Nº of gates
3. Constraints:
K9<=K8
L9<=L8
M9<=M8
O7<=20 (constraint only used for part 3)*
Nº of gates
85
0
110

11275
8750
dq1/dy 0.6 --> income elasticity 0.17
Q1 = 1200-20P1 +2P2^2+0.6Y
Y/q1 0.28340081

Q1 2470

q1(Y=770) 2512

0.01700405 --> 1.7%


new-old/old

dQ1/dY 0.6 eY= 0.17004049 -> 0.17


Y/Q1 0.28340081
Q1 2470
Q1 (Y=770) 2512

Change of demand = (2512-2470)/2470 = 0.01700405 -> 1.7%

You might also like