Zifa Wang
Zifa Wang
Prof. Luis Esteva has been a long-time friend of China, especially with Institute of Engineering
Mechanics (IEM), China Earthquake Administration. He visited IEM and China in early 1980s
when China was still in its early stage of opening to the outer world. When I visited Mexico in
June, 2004 for his support of China’s bid to host 14WCEE, he instantly supported personally our
proposal. During 13WCEE in Vancouver, Canada, as the President of IAEE, he was instrumental
in organizing the Conference and witnessing China’s successful bid (see picture bid.gif). During
the closing ceremony, he was also congratulatory to China for its bid, and his genuine friendly
altitude toward China has made him largely popular among Chinese researchers on earthquake
engineering (see two attached pictures).
In July, 2005, he visited IEM and China again. His lecture on perform-based earthquake
engineering has helped young researchers in IEM to understand the frontline research results
outside China. His meeting with deputy director general of China Earthquake Administration has
been very helpful for us in soliciting supports for organizing 14WCEE in China.
As the secretary general of Chinese Association of Earthquake Engineering and the director of
Institute of Engineering Mechanics, I look forward to his continuous advice and support in the
future. May health and wealth be with him forever!
Zifa Wang
August 18, 2005
EARTHQUAKE DISASTER REDUCTION IN CHINA
ABSTRACT
This paper starts with the broad definition of three major areas of work under
China Earthquake Administration for earthquake disaster reduction. The detailed
contents and measures for every task, combining with the introduction to China
Digital Earthquake Observation Network, is then defined and explained. A
mathematical formula, based on economical impact of every factor in earthquake
disaster reduction, is proposed to consider the overall effect of every measure for
earthquake disaster reduction. Finally, comments toward future direction of
earthquake disaster reduction in China are discussed.
Introduction
The first destructive earthquakes since the founding of People’s Republic of China occurred on
March 8, 1966 in Xingtai, Hebei Province, with a magnitude of 6.8 and 7.2. The quakes killed
more than 8,000 people and injured another 38,000. More than 5 million houses collapsed in the
two events. Since then, the government started to realize the impacts of earthquakes, and
subsequently, China Earthquake Administration (CEA, then called State Seismological Bureau)
was established in 1971 to deal with the taunting task of earthquake disaster reduction. Since its
formation, CEA has undergone a series of evolution in its short history. The name has changed
from State Seismological Bureau to China Seismological Bureau in 1998, and finally to China
Earthquake Administration in 2003. The staff team within CEA has grown from a few dozens of
members to over 12,000 full-time members, including over 8,000 technical personnel. Every
province in China has its provincial branch for earthquake administration, and local branches are
also set up under provincial guidance. In addition, there are 5 major research institutes and a
number of other administration institutes within CEA. These institutes, together with provincial
earthquake administration branches, work under CEA as a large composite team for earthquake
disaster reduction in China.
As one of the very few ministry level government agencies worldwide only for earthquake
disaster reduction, CEA’s focus on earthquake disaster reduction in China has gradually evolved
from earthquake observation, monitoring and prediction only to inclusion of preparedness,
prevention measures and the recent expansion to emergency response and management. These
three areas of work form the foundation for the daily administrational work and the project
planning within CEA.
On the other hand, earthquake prediction has been one of the unique administration areas in
China. There are basically four different types of predictions as defined in the following.
Although much progress has been made in earthquake prediction in China, the overall accuracy
of earthquake prediction is still in its infancy stage. The historical successful example of
predicting the Haicheng Earthquake in 1975 was a combination of empirical experiences and
earthquake observation, which is not readily duplicable in other cases. It is said that the success
rate of short-term prediction is close to 37% while it is higher for long-term and mid-term
predictions. It becomes more difficult to predict imminent occurrence of earthquakes. The
current status is that a few types of earthquakes could be predicted under certain conditions, but
the prediction relies more on empirical experience than scientific analysis. Earthquake prediction
is still a global challenge for earthquake scientists.
Seismic design codes for structures were completed in China as early as 1964. Since then, a
number of improvements have been made, resulting in modified design codes in 1974, 1978,
1989 and 2001. The current seismic design code of buildings is prepared for the purpose of
carrying out the policy of giving priority to the prevention of earthquake disasters so that when
buildings are made earthquake resistant, damage to buildings, loss of life and economic losses
will be minimized. The principles for the design code can be summarized as the following.
When buildings designed based on the code are subjected to the influence of frequently
occurring earthquakes with an intensity of less than the fortification intensity of the region, the
buildings will not be, or will be only slightly damaged and will continue to be serviceable
without repair;
When they are subjected to the influence of earthquakes equal to the fortification intensity of the
region, they may be damaged but will still be serviceable after ordinary repair or without repair;
When they are subjected to the influence of unexpected rare earthquakes with intensity higher
than the fortification intensity of the region, they will neither collapse nor incur damage that
would endanger human lives.
Raising public awareness of earthquake disaster mitigation
Raising public awareness has been proven to be effective in past earthquakes. For example,
during Niigata Chuetsu Earthquake of October 23, 2004, a number of people escaped the disaster
because of prior knowledge on how to respond during an earthquake. This verifies the fact that
public awareness program is effective in reducing especially casualties during an earthquake. In
China, a number of earthquake exhibition halls and special libraries are set up to educate the
public. Outreach programs are sometimes incorporated into extension education for both the
general public and students in classrooms.
Another set of result issued as national regulation is the national acceleration zonation map for
China (2000), as shown in figure 1.
Figure 1 Acceleration zonation map for China (2000) [CEA, 2004].
There are two rules as regard to how to apply the result from this map.
• Ordinary industrial and civil structures can be built in accordance with the above zoning
map
• Key construction projects and lifeline works have to be constructed in line with the
results from dedicated engineering assessment
Starting from 2003 a new national key project, called China Digital Earthquake Observation
Network, is under way for a 5-year construction. Included in this project are three networks
(seismic observation, precursory, and strong ground motion), three systems (active fault
detection, information, and emergency response and commanding), and a training base for rescue
teams. Active fault detection system tries to identify active faults in almost all the major cities in
China, including the provincial capitals in the country. When the result from this project is
compiled, it will definitely help the preparedness and prevention of earthquake disaster if it
happens.
Earthquake loss estimation tries to assess the economical impact of an earthquake disaster should
it happens. The purpose of this field of work is to identify the most vulnerable spots within a city
during an earthquake, and corresponding retrofitting measures are proposed at the same time.
For example, in Daqing city of Heilongjiang province, earthquake loss estimation is performed
for the whole city as well as the surrounding oil fields, and numerous vulnerable spots are
identified for further repair and enhancement. The result can be readily incorporated into city
planning.
Ever since its founding, CISAR has played a major role in relief, search and rescue. It was
deployed domestically to Bachu-Jiashi Earthquake and Zhaosu Earthquake in Xinjiang Province.
Internationally it was deployed to Algiers, Iran in 2003 and it was again deployed to Indonesia
after the great Sumatran Earthquake of 2004. The team has won a high fame as a hard working
and reliable search and rescue team at the field, thus earn an excellent reputation both
domestically and internationally.
From the above, it is clear that if we convert casualty loss into economic loss this becomes a
typical problem in operational research. By studying the amount variation of total loss due to the
change in every domain of work in earthquake disaster reduction, we can assess the effect of
different measures. With such a formula in place, we can at least derive the results for the
following questions.
At this time, China is planning its 11th 5-year plan for earthquake disaster reduction. A long-term
plan for year 2020 is also simultaneously happening. In the next five years, China will focus on
at least the following areas in order to reduce the impacts of potential destructive earthquakes.
For further reduction of earthquake disaster in China, both international and domestic help are
needed and a closer international collaboration is expected in the coming years.
References
China Earthquake Administration (2003), annual report (2003)
Wang, Z. (2005), Research Report for 11th 5-yearPlan for Earthquake Disaster Reduction, Recent
Developments in World Seismology, 2005(7), 17-22