Models of Social Justice

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4

1

Models of Social Justice

Student’s Name

Institutional Affiliation

Course Name and Number

Instructor’s Name

Assignment Due Date


2

Models of Social Justice

Public fairness is an equitable and just distribution and division of the community’s

opportunities, properties, freedoms, and other things. Social impartiality is broad, and many

theorists defined it differently depending on time and the circumstances in which they felt the

term fits perfectly. However, the critical aspects of social justice entail fairness and equity among

everyone. According to Outhwaite & Bottomore (1993), most ancient religions believed that

social justice is a term that God ordained and made the foundation of all organizations, whether

political, religious, or academic. Therefore, this journal explores seven models of social fairness

to identify a theory that brings out a better understanding of social equality, consciousness, and

justice evolution.

All the seven concepts project well the idea of social justice, awareness, and equity. For

example, the “Utilitarianism model” states that the amount of justice and virtue is achievable

through utility and realism. Therefore, without everyday usefulness, there is no justice. On the

other hand, the “Self-Perfectionism” theorist states that a just community can develop in a

scenario where everyone is responsible enough to do their duties. For instance, when lawyers do

their duties well in the court of law, no crime will go unpunished. Other theories such as “the

Marxism model,” “Existentialism theory,” “Libertarianism,” and “Ambedkarism model of social

justice” have a relatively similar idea of social justice and equity (Barry, 1989).

Among the seven theorists, “The Rawls Model” is the most useful for a better

understanding of social evenhandedness, equity, and mindfulness. “Rawls’s concept”

summarizes the idea of justice as a setting where everyone in the society has equal privileges to

the all-embracing total system of fundamental rights that are well-matched with a parallel

structure of liberty for everyone. The theorist suggested that all economic and societal disparities
3

should encourage a community to meet the needs of the vulnerable population among them.

Also, organizations should establish systems that serve every one equally without any social

discrimination or biases (Rawls, 1972).

Rawls (1972) successfully brings out the concept of social consciousness as a person’s

internal values that drive them to behave in a particular manner. It is associated with feelings,

either of remorse, guilt, pride, or shame, that aid a person’s sense of good or evil, individually or

communally. People with the proper social realization can make choices that benefit themselves,

and everyone else in their surroundings since this virtue compels them to be morally and socially

upright.

Social mindfulness is the central pillar that affirms communal justice. According to

“Rawls’s theory,” people must be able to treat each other with admiration and honor to archive

social evenhandedness. A society with a well-established justice system enjoys the fruits of

equity. Societal equality is only achievable when community members relate well with each

other and are comfortable with their justice system, giving them equal opportunities that are vital

in maintaining and reestablishing balance or equity. Social awareness, justice, and equity work

together as a unit. It is not easy to form a perfect justice system without the three pillars of

conscience, impartiality, and the state of societal equilibrium.


4

References

Barry, B. (1989). Theories of justice: a treatise on social justice, Vol. 1 (Vol. 16). Univ of

California Press.

Rawls, H. M. (1973). Rawls’ theory of justice--I. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2217486

Outhwaite, W., & Bottomore, T. (1993). Twentieth-century social thought. Twentieth-Century

Social Thought. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?

doi=10.1.1.458.5620&rep=rep1&type=pdf

You might also like