General Studies Programme
General Studies Programme
General Studies Programme
Abstract
Civic education is a critical part of general education in societies. It facilitates political
participation which is a prerequisite for a progressive democratic society. Nations of the
world adopt strategies in educational policies to reflect this purpose which ultimately affect
national development. General Studies Programme (GSP) is such a strategy adopted by the
Nigerian government through the university system to broaden the scope of undergraduates
to imbibe the spirit of responsiveness, mutual understanding and patriotism. This paper
aimed at examining the degree of success of the programme in enhancing civic education
with its resultant effect on the electoral process. Government and operators of the GSP will
find results of this study useful in refocusing on areas which will enhance achievement of its
set objectives. A combined qualitative and quantitative methodology was adopted to analyse
the secondary data got on the 2011 and 2015 Presidential election results in Nigeria. It was
found that total no. of votes cast dropped by about 25% in 2015 compared to 2011. Voter
turn-out during the same period also dropped by 10%. This means that expected positive
impact of GSP on civic education leading to political participation has not been realized. It
could be as a result of deficiencies on individual or collective basis. The study recommended
that the GSP should be given more breadth and depth, citizens should be more broad-minded
and government should expand the coverage of Tertiary Education Trust Fund to all
universities involved in this programme.
Key words: Civic Education, General Studies Programme, Political Participation, Voter
Turn-Out, Presidential Election and Tertiary Education Trust Fund.
Introduction
Education is an instrument adopted by nations of the world to direct human resource along an
appropriate path to achieve productive and growing societies (Felleke, 2005). It therefore
behooves on countries with the goal of development to devise strategies to utilize education
to its advantage. The process of implementing such identified strategies varies from nation to
nation. An early and appropriate investment in education is an effective mobilizer of
developmental potentials in a country bearing in mind that as education derives inspiration
from society, it also reciprocally contributes to societal growth and development (Nweke and
Nwoye, 2016).
Civic education, a subset of general education entails political involvement, giving awareness
and building capacity to encourage participation of citizens of a nation in governance (CETA,
2010). It engages all citizens, enhances leadership potentials and encourages democratic
practice. It brings into focus citizenship rights and obligations as well as issues of overall
development of the nation.
Nigerian universities (Federal, State and Privately owned), are all uniformly monitored along
the same identified standards by the National Universities Commission (NUC). This
Commission sets out benchmark of standards which must be complied with by universities
and with its periodic accreditation checks, defaulting institutions are penalized.
In the Minimum Academic Standards (MAS) issued by the NUC in 1989 to Nigerian
universities, the General Studies Programme (GSP) was introduced. It later had the addition
of Entrepreneurship studies to the programme in 2002. MAS was later reviewed by NUC to
become Benchmark Minimum Academic Standards (BMAS) in 2007.
General Studies Programme (GSP) in Nigeria is an aspect of the educational policy of the
country covering a set of identified courses to be of general applicability to undergraduates of
universities in Nigeria beyond their normal respective disciplines. The overall aim is to
broaden the scope of all students and harness such acquired knowledge to impact positively
the development of the country. The relationship of this Programme and Civic education in
Nigeria is the subject to be examined in this paper.
Objectives of Study
The general objective of this paper is to examine the effect of the operation of GSP on the
dependent variable, civic education in Nigeria. Additionally, it seeks to do the following:
a. Examine the extent of adoption of the GSP by Nigerian universities;
b. Examine the degree of update the programme has witnessed since introduction; and
c. Determine the impact on civic education as manifested in Voter Turn-out in 2011 and
2015 Presidential election results in Nigeria.
(2005), two clear forms of education can be identified, namely, “Education for literacy
(education widening) and Education for advancement (education deepening)”. The former
merely takes the beneficiary out of the cycle of ignorance but the latter goes further to utilize
it as a spring board to achieving national development.
Civic education which is a subset of education enhances democracy in societies with clearly
identified rights and duties of members of society aimed at national development. This is to
ensure that the people participate in governance.
As identified by Almond and Verba (2015), while there exists three defined types of political
culture which are “Parochial, Subject and Participant”, it is the Participant type that is
encouraged in democratic settings. In Parochial political culture, citizens are not aware of
what transpires outside their immediate domain. They are ignorant of both inputs and outputs
of the political system. In Subject political culture, citizens are aware of the outputs of the
system but not interested in contributing. In Participant political culture however, citizens are
aware of both inputs and outputs of the political system and are willing to participate. This is
the type which a progressive society desires.
General Studies Programme in tertiary institutions is not peculiar to Nigeria. Since it entails
broadening the thinking scope of students beyond the immediate disciplines, which will be
useful to them and society, many countries adopt the programme. Troy University in
Alabama, United States of America (USA) for instance has the programme as a common
curriculum of courses for first and second year students which they take as constituting a
good background for life‟s journey. At Webster University, Missouri, also in United States of
America (USA), there is a Bachelor of Arts (BA) degree course in General Studies which
they view as an inter-disciplinary course to help students and enable them contribute
positively to society.
From the review, it is clear that GSP is part of the educational policy that can contribute
towards national development in a democratic setting through the instrument of enhanced
civic education. This supports Felleke‟s (2005) argument of having education for
advancement rather than that for mere literacy. Voter education is seen as instrumental to the
outcome that is got from elections showing the degree of involvement of citizens in
governance agreeing with Almond and Verba‟s (2015) Participant political culture.
However, has this been proven right in the Nigerian case or not? This is the gap to be filled.
Communication theory is relevant in this subject. Communication can be taken as a process
whereby human beings relate to one another with the purpose of transferring meaning.
Lasswell (1971) views communication as a process involving “who says what, to whom, in
what channel and with what effect?” This is commonly referred to as „the Dance model of
IIARD – International Institute of Academic Research and Development Page 28
Journal of Public Administration and Social Welfare Research Vol. 3 No. 1 2018 ISSN 2504-3597
www.iiardpub.org
Methodology
The methodology adopted in this paper is mainly qualitative. Secondary data got from
textbooks, journals, magazines, newspapers and internet is used in the examination of GSP
and Civic education in Nigeria. Some descriptive statistics are however used in the tabular
presentation of some secondary data to show variation in values which makes it slightly
quantitative as well.
The Discourse
The National Universities Commission (NUC) as per Decree/Act 16 of 1985 which was
amended as Decree/Act 48 of 1988 is authorized as the regulator of university education in
Nigeria to standardize programmes offered by them in line with prescribed minimum
academic standards. In 1989, the Minimum Academic Standards (MAS) document was put in
place and it became a basis for accreditation of universities. This was when the General
Studies Programme was instituted. In 2002, the Entrepreneurship course was added to the
programme (Okojie, 2011). This is to broaden the scope of the GST Programme to
incorporate teaching how skills can be acquired for “self-sustenance and reliance of eventual
graduates of universities” and be of benefit to the country (Ekong and Williams, 2006).
MAS which was revised as BMAS (Benchmark Minimum Academic Standards) for Nigerian
universities in 2007 reconfirmed the salience of the GSP by even adding the course on Peace
studies and Conflict resolution. According to the NUC (2007), the GSP is “to equip Nigerian
graduates from universities with appropriate knowledge and skill, competences and
dispositions to make them globally competitive and capable of contributing meaningfully to
Nigeria’s socio-economic development”.
The main goal of the GSP is to produce morally and intellectually capable graduates with
vision and entrepreneurship skills in a milieu of peace and social cohesiveness.
The objectives of the Programme are as follows:
1. Acquisition, development and inculcation of the proper value-orientation for the
survival of the individual and society;
2. Development of intellectual capacities of individuals to understand, appreciate and
promote peaceful co-existence;
3. Production of graduates with broad knowledge of the Nigerian nation and people with
a view to inculcating in them mutual understanding and patriotism;
4. Exposing graduates of Nigerian universities to the rudiments of ICT for computer
literacy and ability to live usefully in this ICT age;
5. Preparing students for a post-university life with opportunities for job creation and
entrepreneurial skills; and
6. Production of graduates capable of communicating effectively, both oral and written
(NUC, 2007).
To propagate this programme, NUC identified the following courses as its constituents:
a. Communication in English
b. Logic, Philosophy and Human Existence
c. Nigerian peoples and culture
d. Use of library, study skills and ICT
e. Communication in French/Arabic
f. History and philosophy of Science
g. Peace studies and Conflict resolution
h. Introduction to Entrepreneurial skills/studies
The purpose of the establishment of GSP is also in conformity with the goals of tertiary
education in Nigeria which are as follows:
1. To contribute to national development through manpower training;
2. Develop proper values for survival of individuals and society;
3. Develop intellectual capacity to appreciate local/international milieus;
4. Acquire skills to be self-reliant and useful in community
5. Promote national unity; and
6. Promote national/international relationship (Federal Republic of Nigeria, 2005).
To the extent that NUC is the regulatory body set up by government to ensure a standardized
educational platform for all universities in Nigeria, no university can ignore its mandate.
Currently, the number of universities in Nigeria is taken as 143 comprising 40 federal, 42
State and 61 private universities (Premium Times, 2017). To maintain a uniform standard of
education in the country, all universities, not minding the ownership obey NUC‟s
instructions. Default attracts withdrawn accreditation which may even lead to closure.
Since 1989 when the GSP was introduced into the university system, there have been
updates. By 2002, there was the addition of the Entrepreneurship course to encourage
entrepreneurial skill acquisition and reduce the incidence of graduate unemployment. As per
NUC‟s guideline (NUC, 2007), Peace studies and conflict resolution course had also been
incorporated signifying the importance attached to both domestic and international peace
maintenance.
The impact that has been made by the General Studies Programme on Civic Education will
be examined from the data got from the 2011 and 2015 Presidential elections in Nigeria. This
is to assess if the acquisition of the GSP knowledge since 1989 has been of any significant
impact on political participation of Nigerians from the standpoint of the election results in the
two years. This is in line with the expectations of the GSP as enumerated in its objectives.
As per information provided by the Centre for Public Policy Alternatives (CPPA, 2015), data
from 2011 and 2015 Presidential election results in Nigeria are as follows:
In 2011,
Registered voters: 72,611,070
Total votes cast: 38,209,978
No. of political parties involved: 20
Voter Turn-out (Total votes cast/Total registered voters): 54%
In 2015,
Registered voters: 67,422,005
Total votes cast: 29,432,083
No. of political parties involved: 14
IIARD – International Institute of Academic Research and Development Page 30
Journal of Public Administration and Social Welfare Research Vol. 3 No. 1 2018 ISSN 2504-3597
www.iiardpub.org
Voter Turn-out (Total votes cast/Total registered voters): 43.65% (CPPA, 2015).
The data from CPPA further revealed that since 1999, the Presidential elections voter turn-out
has dropped from 52% in 1999 to 43.65% in 2015. The reduction of Total number of votes
cast in 2015, compared with 2011 is about 25%. Regional distribution of voter turn-out in the
elections also shows reduction in 2015 (compared with 2011) except for Southwest alone that
recorded an increase from 32% to 40%.
Furthermore, there are increasing incidences of inter-ethnic rivalries in different parts of the
country. The crises in Southern Kaduna and the renewed clashes of Modakeke/Ife people of
2016 are cases in point.
How well then has this GSP delivered at the highest level of academic pursuit, the university,
which is expected to speculate downwards to the different segments of the society achieved
its goal?
Discussion of Findings
From the objectives of the GSP, it is obvious that that four of the six are directly aimed at
The remaining two which are indirectly related but still contribute to expected national
development of the country are as follows:
1. Exposing graduates of Nigerian universities to the rudiments of ICT for computer
literacy and ability to live usefully in this ICT age; and
2. Production of graduates capable of communicating effectively, both oral and written.
Some of the courses on the programme including Logic, philosophy and human existence,
Nigerian peoples and culture, History and philosophy of science, Peace studies and conflict
resolution and Introduction to entrepreneurial skills are of positive relevance to civic
education. The courses are also within the bracket of the goals of tertiary education in
Nigeria.
Conclusion
It is clear from this paper that education for advancement is what Nigeria desires. The GSP is
also seen as a veritable instrument in this process of national development. This can best be
manifested in a plural society like Nigeria by having programmes that encourage integration
and participation of most citizens in the enhancement of democratic practice, devoid of
rancor and distractions.
It is also obvious that in a democratic system, these expectations can only be realized through
the ballot box and confidence in the electoral mechanism through voting which is the
required signal for progress.
From the data given, this degree of comfort to ascertain the positive effect of the GSP has not
been achieved. This is further substantiated by Lasswell‟s theory of communication
attributing success of the whole communication process to the effect recorded at the end of
the sequence.
In complying with the objectives of this study, the adoption of the GSP programme can be
IIARD – International Institute of Academic Research and Development Page 32
Journal of Public Administration and Social Welfare Research Vol. 3 No. 1 2018 ISSN 2504-3597
www.iiardpub.org
said to be broad-based but may be not all the first two year level students are exposed to it.
Update of the programme can be said to be regularly carried out by NUC as seen with the
inclusion of Entrepreneurial as well as Peace and conflict courses. The impact of the GSP on
civic education however is that which is not significant.
This means there are some anomalies or deficiencies which have to be corrected for there to
be progress. These deficiencies could be individual or collective which has bearing on
government‟s effort at creating sufficient awareness. It could be that the teaching is not
thorough enough with necessary practical aids or they are not made compulsory for all first
and second year students as required. It could also be as a result of financial constraints on
some universities to prosecute the programme adequately.
Recommendations
Based on the conclusion above, the following recommendations are proffered:
1. All first and second year students in all Nigerian universities should be taught GSP
courses in full compliance with NUC‟s requirements;
2. The lectures should be down-to-earth so as to make them true to life focused on the
achievement of the six objectives of the GSP. This will lead to productive thinking on
the part of the beneficiaries;
3. Citizens should learn not to view all tasks on a zero-sum basis (winner takes all) in
their daily engagements with other members of society;
4. Federal government, through the National Orientation Agency, NOA, should intensify
the awareness campaign to citizens on the objectives of the GSP; and
5. Federal government should ensure a level-playing field for all Nigerian universities
propagating the GSP by allowing them access to TETFUND.
References
Almond, G. and Verba, S. (2015). Civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five
nations. Princeton: Princeton Legacy Library.
CETA (2010). Civics and general studies. Civic Education Teachers Association, Vol. 7,
March.
CPPA (2015). Presidential election outcome: Analysis and implications. The Centre for
Public policy Alternatives, April.
Ekong and Williams in Ogah, M. E. and Emesini, N. O. (2013). Appraisal of general studies
(Gst) entrepreneurship skills acquisition curriculum for university undergraduates in
Nigeria: Challenges and the way forward. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences,
Vol. 4, No. 7.
Federal Republic of Nigeria (2005). National policy on education and major reforms and
innovation recently introduced into the Nigerian educational system, 4th ed with 2005
12 update.
Felleke, G. (2005). Education and modernization: An examination of the experiences of
Japan and Ethiopia. African and Asian Studies, Vol. 4, No. 4.
Greer, S. (1969). The logic of social enquiry. Chicago: Aldine.
Lasswell, H. (1971). The structure and function of communication in society. New York:
Institute for Religious and Social Studies.
National Universities Commission (2007). Benchmark minimum academic standards for
undergraduate programmes in Nigerian universities.
Nweke, C. and Nwoye, C. (2016). Journal of African Studies, Vol. 1, No. 6.
Okojie, J. (2011). Introductory speech of the executive secretary of National universities
commission on undergraduate programme for Gst entrepreneurship in Abuja, Feb.
IIARD – International Institute of Academic Research and Development Page 33
Journal of Public Administration and Social Welfare Research Vol. 3 No. 1 2018 ISSN 2504-3597
www.iiardpub.org
Osaghae, E. E. (1990). The problem of citizenship in Nigeria. Africa. ANNO XLV, No. 4.
Premium Times (2017). Total number of universities in Nigeria, 17th March.