Modern UWB Communication
Modern UWB Communication
Publisher Inderscience
Xin Gao*
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering,
The University of Arizona,
Tucson, AZ 85721, USA
Email: [email protected]
*Corresponding author
Lian Huai
Microsoft Inc.,
Microsoft Building 40,
Redmond, WA 98052, USA
Email: [email protected]
Abstract: Regarding the modulation schemes and multiple access techniques, modern
ultra-wideband (UWB) communication displays unique features in wideband, high-speed data
transmission, low-power consumption and high security comparing to other wireless
communication systems. We present a general review of historical development, key features and
typical applications on UWB, then briefly discuss its recent progress in IEEE standards,
application potentials for broadband wireless access and current benefits. Future development on
UWB transmission schemes and challenges of system design, are concisely proposed in contrast
to those of several other typical communication systems.
Reference to this paper should be made as follows: Gao, X. and Huai, L. (2020) ‘Modern
ultra-wideband communications: recent overview and future prospects’, Int. J. Ultra Wideband
Communications and Systems, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp.57–67.
Biographical notes: Xin Gao is a PhD student in the Department of Electrical Engineering at the
University of Arizona, Tucson, USA. His research interests mainly include 3D image recovery
and reconstruction, anomaly detection in traffic analysis, statistical signal processing, modern
algorithms on digital image analysis and digital image processing, automatic object detection and
classification, data (signal, image and video, etc.) compression in intelligent transportation
systems, biomedical signal processing and imaging devices.
Lian Huai received her Bachelor’s and Master’s degrees from Huazhong University of Science
and Technology in 2007 and 2009, respectively, and PhD degree in Department of Electrical and
Computer Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis in December 2014. She is
currently working as a Software Engineer in Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA.
2.1 System model for UWB transmitters and Detector Demodulator Remapping
Binary
stream
receivers
As is adopted by the IEEE802.15.3a standard, standard
UWB systems are featured with path loss, shadowing and 2.2 Single carrier-based modulation
small-scale fading channel models (Ghavami et al., 2004):
For single-carrier-based modulation of UWB, the pulse
the free-space path loss is centred at frequency fc given by
position modulation (PPM), bipolar signalling (BPSK),
f L f H where fL and fH are picked up at the –10 dB edge of pulse amplitude modulation (PAM), on/off keying (OOK),
waveform spectrum. It is assumed that shadowing has the orthogonal pulse modulation (OPM) and their combinations,
lognormal distribution with standard deviation of 3 dB, and stand for keynote schemes. PPM and BPSK are good
the small-scale fading is reliable on the Saleh-Valenzuela candidates for UWB due to the fact that they have better
model (Siriwongpairat and Liu, 2004) with channel impulse bit-energy performance than that of PAM or OOK from
response: theoretic views. The periodical waveforms of PPM and
C L BPSK for UWB modulation (Dueñas, 2005) are depicted in
h(t ) = α (c, l ) ⋅ δ (t − T − τ
c =0 l =0
c c ,l ) (1) Figures 4(a) and 4(b), where Δc denotes the impulse of time
delay.
Notably, the M-ary PPM signal is structured as (Dueñas,
where C and L denotes the number of clusters and the 2005):
corresponding number of rays with clusters, respectively.
+∞
α(c, l) presents the gain of the lth multi-path component in
the cth cluster, τc,l stands for the delay of the lth path relative
x1 (t ) = w ( t − kT
k =−∞
f − m(k ) ⋅ Td ) (2)
to the cth cluster arrival time. A block diagram for standard
UWB systems (Dueñas, 2005) is shown in Figure 2. where w (⋅) is the pulsed waveform, m(k) ∈ {0, 1, …,
For UWB transmitters, small-pulsed generating M – 1} denotes the kth M-ary symbol, Tf and Td represent
antennas represented a compatible match and saved the each symbol period and the modulation delay, respectively.
efforts of upper frequency conversion. Hence, the rather
inexpensive broad-width transmitters are directly applicable
and hence make substitutions of both the amplifier and the
Figure 3 (a) Structure of a UWB transmitter (b) Structure of the corresponding receiver to a UWB system
Transmit
data Convolutional Convolutional BPSK/4 BOK RF
Scrambler Spreading
encoder interleaver modulator processing
Acquisition sequence
Start frame delimiter
Training sequence
(a)
Acquisition
frame synchronisation
channel estimation
Receive
data Viterbi BPSK/4 BOK CMF and
Descrambler Deinterleaver RF
decoder demodulator DFE rake receiver processing
(b)
Figure 4 (a) PPM waveform (b) BPSK waveform for UWB and direct-sequence spreading-spectrum (DS-SS), both of
(see online version for colours) which utilise pseudo-noise (PN) codes to get separate
users (Siriwongpairat and Liu, 2004). Figure 5 depicts a
TH-UWB signal with PPM modulation, and the transmitted
signal can be structured as (Dueñas, 2005):
+∞
x (t ) = w ( t − kT
k =−∞
f − c(k ) ⋅ Tc − m(k ) ⋅ Td ) (4)
where Tf, Tc and Td denote the frame interval, time shift and
the modulation delay, respectively.
(a)
Figure 5 TH-UWB signal with PPM modulation (see online 2.3 Multi-band OFDM-based UWB modulation
version for colours)
The present main technique of UWB to deal with delay
spread, is named as the multi-band (MB) OFDM-based
modulation. As proposed on multi-band for IEEE802.15.3a
standard (Ghavami et al., 2004; Dueñas, 2005), the entire
7.5 GHz UWB spectrum were divided into 14 sub-bands
(each one equivalently occupies a bandwidth of 528 MHz),
every sub-band held 128 OFDM sub-carriers with
4.125 MHz bandwidth (as depicted in Figure 7).
Modulated OFDM symbols are time-interleaved across
sub-bands. Similar as the standard OFDM technique, every
In single-band UWB systems, since multi-users often OFDM-UWB signal can be constructed by (Ghavami et al.,
simultaneously have cooperative sharing of a single UWB 2004):
spectrum, multiple access techniques have been of great N −1
necessity to coordinate with these users. Typical techniques sk (t ) = d (n) exp( j 2πn ⋅ Δft )
k 0 < t < NTs (6)
are known as the time-hopping spreading-spectrum (TH-SS) n =0
where dk(n) represents the complex coefficient transmitted the booms of systematic complexity. Besides, the inherent
in sub-carrier n during the kth symbol period, N denotes the peak-to-average ratio (PAR) issue of OFDM, remains
number (transmitted symbols) of the sub-carriers per OFDM to be a problematic issue. On the other hand, due to the
block. The sub-carrier frequency is fn = f0 + n · Δf, where Δf limitation of transmission PSD of defined by FCC, the
is the frequency spacing between two adjacent sub-carriers. narrow bandwidth of each sub-carrier would lead to the
The condition of orthogonality requires NTs = 1/Δf when shortage of transmission power, and hence, high data rate
demodulating the OFDM-UWB signal waveform. When communications are difficult to realise. Moreover, since the
f0 = 0, it is proved that the sampled version of the OFDM MB-OFDM adopts even narrow spectrum sub-carrier, the
signal, can be expressed as (Ghavami et al., 2004): property of accurate positioning is lower than those of
N −1
TH-UWB and DS-UWB-based modulation schemes.
d (n) exp j ⋅
2πnk
s ( nTs ) = k (7)
n =0
N Figure 8 (a) Frequency interleaving scheme of multi-band UWB
signals within one group (b) Realisation of multi-band
Hence, inverse discrete Fourier transform (IDFT) can be UWB signals in time domain and frequency domain
used to convert the transmitted symbols into OFDM signal. (see online version for colours)
(a)
Table 2 Comparison of physical layer proposal for IEEE 802.15.3a from major companies