A2 Grant Proposal 1
A2 Grant Proposal 1
A2 Grant Proposal 1
April 2024
Prepared By:
Cole Quirk, Grant Ivesdal, and Payton Sick
Emails:
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
COVER LETTER
UND Drone Team
293 Centennial Drive
Grand Forks, ND 58202
April 7, 2024
Bears that are relocated become harder to track since they are far away from the park.
Most of these bears at one point had a high mortality rate. This is bad for the population of the
bears in the park. With this cycle of relocating bears, bears will continue seeing their population
numbers fall. It is important that we can track these relocated bears, so we can track their
behaviors and habits. Bears that have not been relocated are also affected by the ability to track
them. Being able to track bears in the park is important for keeping them safe and our guests.
Tracking the bears is important to keep them safe and not encourage them to become
comfortable with human interaction. This issue also affects our guests. As a national park the
focus is to maintain the safety of our guests so they can enjoy their stay at the park. With
tracking bears, it would be important for the safety of guests by making sure they are a safe
distance apart.
A solution to the problem of tracking bears would be drones. Drones would give the
researchers the ability to track these bears from a safe distance. The problem with tracking in
recent years was researchers had to get to high places just to get a radio signal of the bear. The
problem with this form of tracking is that it takes hours sometimes to reach these locations and
the other issue was money. Helicopters were a better way to get the radio signals than on foot.
But this is where it would get pricey for parks. Drones have Infared cameras and can easily track
the bears regardless of time of day. Drones would also help create new jobs in the park. The
biggest solution drones solve is the safety of the researchers. Drones help eliminate the traveling
researchers would have to do to be able to track the bears. Drones also can give constant tracking
compared to the radio signal method. The radio signal method cannot be used consistently,
which is why drones are superior to the radio signal method.
LITERATURE REVIEW
THE GRIZZLY BEAR
Before the 1800s, there were thought to be approximately 50,000 grizzly bears in what
soon became the continental US, with a population spreading through 18 different states. In the
early 1900s that population dropped to around 800 and after some revival efforts the grizzly bear
population is now at approximately 2,000 individuals in the lower 48 states, only 4 of which are
still home to grizzly bears, according to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
The current tactic for tracking and monitoring grizzly bear populations is accomplished
by radiotelemetry, a process that uses radio signals to locate and monitor animals that have been
marked. While effective, this process can be dangerous for both the bears and the researchers
because to mark an animal for radio monitoring the individual must be captured and fitted with a
transmitter. This requires researchers to travel through the wilderness and restrain a grizzly bear
while ensuring the safety of the research team and the captured bear.
The biggest threat to the grizzly bear populations is habitat loss due to human expansion
which leads to an increase in human-bear interactions, which often can result in vehicle
collisions, poaching, and conflict between animals and humans. According to the Vital Ground
Foundation, an organization focused on protection grizzly bear populations and habitats, in 2019
alone 69 deaths were recorded in the Yellowstone area 52 of which were directly caused by
humans.
The increase in human-bear interactions is mostly due to the bears gaining confidence
causing them to see camp sites and garbage cans as an easy food source. Once a bear shows
signs of being too comfortable around humans the bear must be relocated and very rarely does a
DRONES
With new technologies advancing rapidly, wildlife conservation efforts are beginning to
change. Recent studies and real-world applications are suggesting that AI might be the tool of the
future. The infinite capabilities of artificial intelligence paired with the accessibility and
efficiency of drones could completely revolutionize the way that humans go about wildlife
conservation.
Unmanned aerial vehicles used for wildlife conservation are created to track, observe, record,
and safeguard species and their environment. To collect essential data, these drones come
equipped with specialized payloads, such as cameras, sensors, and artificial intelligence. Not
only that, but they are designed to maneuver through a variety of terrains, from cliffs and
The process of AI in these drones is complex. In his study about AI counting manatees, Jim
Waymer says, “In computer science, ‘deep learning’ mimics how the human brain works, using
so-called ‘neural networks’ to strengthen certain patterns similar to how neurons form stronger
connections in the brain when humans learn. Think of it as a mental map that gains clarity as
details are added.” These machines could provide data that has never been seen before, maps of
territories and migration patterns and an animal count more accurate than humans could create.
Drones come in all shapes and sizes, but there are only a few that work best for wildlife
management. A fixed-wing VTOL (vertical takeoff and landing) drone offers the best
capabilities. A drone like this provides advanced flight control, time, and range, operates silently,
and is resistant to challenging conditions. With AI in control of payloads like thermal cameras
and high-resolution mapping and surveying systems, monitoring species will be much easier.
THE CONNECTION
The growing number of bear-human contacts has taught bears that food is easily
accessible at campsites and in the form of trash. Usually, if this interaction keeps happening, the
bear is captured and relocated. After decades of this practice researchers were finding out that
these newly located bears often would unfortunately pass only after a few months of being
relocated. Relocated bears usually do not make it or will travel to other places looking for
essentials. “One female traversed some 1,000 miles across four states during a six-month journey
that ultimately brought her back to a den outside the park” (Steinbach). These relocated are used
to this constant human interaction and do not need to always hunt to get food. To combat this
bear and human interaction we can use drones to help track and identify bears' habits.
successful in being a way to track animals. Ultimately researchers hated radio-telemetry, because
to pick up radio signals required researchers to get to high points to pick up signals from distant
tagged animals. Some of the only ways to get to that high point were helicopters. Drones on the
other hand are the perfect way to track bears. Drones are the future for animal tracking in
general. Being able to track bears on a consistent basis would vastly improve not only the bears'
health, but also improve the safety of people visiting the park. Drones would also allow
researchers to track more than one bear at a time. One of the downsides to radio-telemetry was
that only one animal can be tracked at a single time. With the new ability to be able to track more
bears at once researchers can save more time. With the use of drones' researchers would not have
to worry about traveling and risking their own safety just to get a radio signal from a bear.
PROJECT OVERVIEW
We will be beginning this project with two drones, however before ordering the drones a
building should be constructed in the park for each drone. The buildings will be where the drone
will be controlled, maintained and housed while not in use. These buildings will also be where
the data gathered from the program will be stored and analyzed. The drones we will be using
have a specific flight radius so to get the most out of the drones and to prevent overlap in data
these buildings should be twice that amount away from each other.
The drones will be purchased and delivered from Skyfront a drone manufacturing
company based in Redwood City California, and it should take approximately 3 to 4 business
days to ship the drones to Glacier National Park. Once they arrive, the drones must be set up and
prepped for use in their respective buildings. From there a team will work in both buildings to
operate and maintain the drone, while analyzing the collected data.
The drones will be used to find grizzly bears within the radius and track the animals'
habits. They will also be used to track how far the grizzly bears travel in a day and alert the
operators when the bears get too close to areas of the park with more traffic. As well as mark
other protected wildlife refuges. For the bear program in Glacier National Park specifically we
are hoping to keep better track of the grizzly bear population within the park without the need for
the semi-invasive transmitters used today, making the process safer and less stressful for the
With this program we would also gain a better understanding of the bears' migration patterns and
denning habits. With that information, we could alter the park in a way that could minimize bear
and human interactions. Preventing the bears from getting too comfortable around populated
areas. While also being better for the bears this would also be safer for the people traveling to the
park as it would decrease the number of grizzly bear attacks. As well as keeping an eye on the
Total $583,650
The budget we’re asking for breaks down as so. The drones, payloads, and Jeep
Wranglers are one-time costs, two of each, but we have budgeted for a second set of each in case
of the need for replacement. Drone operators and data analysts are paid by salary each year, so
they eat up most of the budget. These salaries are based on averages and can be subject to
change. The computer setup is complex, the computers themselves aren’t too expensive, but the
software that our analysts will use needs to be bought monthly. Electricity and gas are simple
budget concepts, for now they are estimations. All this totals to just below 2.5 million dollars
over a five-year period. For what our proposal is planning on doing, and how much money is
given to national parks by the government, we believe that this is a very reasonable request.
TIMELINE
Time Operations
February yr. 1 Obtain a 5 Year Research and Collection Permit. Get in contact with
Funding and permits are the only things that could slow this.
March yr. 1 Males emerge from hibernation. Begin first operations. They will be
slow to start but this will be best for the team to get settled.
April yr. 1 Females and cub emerge from hibernation. Continue operations at a
continuously map the entire park. Analysts will look at data and begin
May-November Continue operating daily. Once territories are distinguished a new plan
yr. 1 will be made to spend more time in those areas. Migration patterns over
November- All bears will move into hibernation eventually. Operations can
December yr. 1 continue, but there will be less action. At any time, the weather could
January-February A plan of action for the upcoming season will be created. All data
yr. 1 collected can be used to help conserve bears and keep the park safe.
March yr. 1 – yr. 5 Essentially repeat each step, making changes as the data requires.
Park is a long-term investment for the development of life of one of America’s greatest species.
Our project aims at using the newest technologies to make monitoring and studying grizzly bear
populations more efficient and safer for both companies. By supporting us and our cause, you are
allowing us to gather data more accurately and respond to conflicts within the park faster. This
will ultimately aid the long-term survival of the grizzly bear, the ecosystem, and the park itself.
Your grant will show the world what this technology is capable of and pave the way for more
conservation efforts in parks around the nation and the world. Thank you for considering our
proposal and supporting the future of grizzly bears in Glacier National Park.
WORK CITED
Bears In Montana | Montana FWP. (2022). Retrieved April 4, 2024, from Mt.gov website:
https://fwp.mt.gov/conservation/wildlife-management/bear/management
“CW-25E Long Endurance Electric Fixed-Wing VTOL Drone.” JOUAV, 14 Sept. 2023,
www.jouav.com/products/cw-25e.html.
Grizzly Bear (Ursus arctos horribilis) | U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service. (2021). Retrieved April 4,
2024, from FWS.gov website: https://www.fws.gov/species/grizzly-bear-ursus-arctos-
horribilis
Ground, V. (2020, May 13). Life on the Brink: The Unsettling Numbers About How Grizzly
Bears Die. Retrieved April 4, 2024, from Grizzly bear conservation and protection
website: https://www.vitalground.org/life-on-the-brink-how-grizzly-bears-die/
Radio Telemetry and Wildlife Tracking. (2014). Retrieved April 4, 2024, from The Yellowstone
Grizzly Project website: http://www.yellowstonegrizzlyproject.org/radio-telemetry-and-
wildlife-tracking.html
Waymer, Jim. "FAU Study Suggests using AI to Count Manatees: Could be More Accurate than
Tallies by Humans." Florida Today, Jan 15, 2024. ProQuest,
https://ezproxy.library.und.edu/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/newspapers/fau-study-
suggests-using-ai-count-manatees/docview/2914355079/se-2.
“Wildlife Drones: How to Use Drones for Wildlife Conservation?” JOUAV, 10 Nov. 2023,
www.jouav.com/blog/wildlife-
drone.html#:~:text=Wildlife%20drones%20are%20unmanned%20aerial,data%20while%2
0minimizing%20human%20disturbance.
- Division of labor
o 1 Page - Cover Page: Payton
o 1-page, Single, extra space between paragraph - Cover Letter: Cole
o 1-page single - Summary: Cole
o 3-page double - Lit Review: ALL
▪ 1 – Bears Payton
▪ 2 – Drones Grant
▪ 3 – Connect Cole
o 1-3 double - Explanation: Payton
o 1/2-1 double - Outcomes: Payton
o 1-page double max - Budget: Grant
o 1/2-page double - Timeline: Grant
o 1- page double max Conclusion: Grant
o Works Cited: