0% found this document useful (0 votes)
17 views3 pages

RUBRICS

The document provides a rubric to evaluate continuous lab assessments in four key areas: understanding of the problem and background theory, coding, compilation, and execution and results. The rubric defines performance criteria for excellent, good, average, and below average work in each area.

Uploaded by

varsha.sa2006
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
17 views3 pages

RUBRICS

The document provides a rubric to evaluate continuous lab assessments in four key areas: understanding of the problem and background theory, coding, compilation, and execution and results. The rubric defines performance criteria for excellent, good, average, and below average work in each area.

Uploaded by

varsha.sa2006
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Rubric for Evaluating Continuous Lab Assessments

Explanation of the Excellent Good Average Below Average/poor


S.No Components
Components (>90% - <100%) (>70% - <89% ) (>60% - <69%) (<50%)
 Student is
able to
understand  Student
 Level of  Student is
the problem is capable
understanding of able to
domain in an of
the specific understand the
extremely expressing the  Not capable of
problem of the problem domain
good manner. problem understanding the
experiment. in a satisfactory
domain in a problem domain.
 Always start  Capable of manner.
good manner.  Not able to express
with the phrase writing step  Capable to
 Able to write the step by step
like "the by step write the step
Aim and the step by step procedure for the
objective of procedure of by step
Backgrou procedure in a specified problem
this the problem procedure but
1 nd Theory simple way but domain.
experiment is to". domain not exactly to
20 marks not accurately.
 Competence of the precisely. the domain.  Unaware of the
 Able to symbols and
students to come  Having  Able to
express the representations to
up with step by enough skill to provide a
problem express the problem
step procedure to express the pictorial
domain in a domain in a required
build the algorithm. problem in a representation
clear picture format. (if
 How well the neat pictorial but not upto
but not in a applicable)
student is able to representation the standard
crispy way.
represent the with specifications.
(using more
solution to the appropriate (if applicable)
symbols)
problem in a symbols.
pictorial way. (if applicable)
(if applicable)
 The ability of the  Student is  Able to write  Able to write  Student is not
students to write a capable of the coding part the instructions capable of writing the
Standard Set of writing the based on syntax but only with coding part.
instructions to instructions and semantics the help of  Wrong usage of
execute/represent syntactically and but not with the Teacher. syntax and semantics.
the problem semantically in optimization.  Complexity of  No usage of
Coding domain. (including a precise  Complexity of the problem appropriate
2 30 marks comment lines, manner. the problem domain is methodology.
detailed  Able to write domain is considered but
explanation of the the coding considered. not upto the
particular optimistically  Able to use level.
instruction) and analyze relevant terms  Some terms
 How the complexity. and methodology. and
appropriately the  Able to use methodology
syntax and very apt terms used.
semantics is written and
by the student. methodology.
 The skill of using  Student is  Student is  Student is liable  Studentis unaware of
appropriate inputs capable of capable of to use incorrect the compilation
and outputs. compiling the compiling the syntaxes due to procedures.
 How program in a program but with lack of  Not capable of
Compilation professionally perfect manner few errors. knowledge. producing the results.
30 marks the compilation without errors.  Able to use  Capable of
3
procedure is  Able to use appropriate correcting the
done. appropriate syntax/ semantics errors but only
 The efficiency of the syntax/ semantics and debug with with the help of
student in correcting and debug it with one or more Teacher.
the errors present in nil errors. warnings.
the coding.
 Obtaining the  Student is  Student is  Student is  Student is not able to
exact solution to the capable of capable of obtaining the furnish a related
given problem and producing exact producing results solution with solution to the
accurate result to results for only for compile or run problem.
the aim without various types of particular inputs. time errors and  Lack of knowledge in
Execution
errors. inputs.  Able to try able to rectify it giving appropriate
4 and Results
 Inclusion of  Able to some part to with the help of inputs.
10 marks
generalization of the produce a generalize. a teacher.  No choice of
problem. generalized  No choice of generalization.
solution to the generalization.
problem.

How
  Student is  Student is  Student is not  Student is not able
provisionally the able to bring able to produce able to produce to produce the
Documentation and out a the document the document in document even with
presentation of the document in with some a prescribed the help of teacher.
Documentation- components from an efficient components but format.  Unable to explain
Explanation of 1-4 is done. manner by not in a  Able to explain the problem.
5 the experiment/  The ability of the including all the prescribed the problem but
Viva student in components format. irrelevant to the
10 marks explaining and from 1 to 4.  Able to concept.
demonstrating the  Able to give explain the
solved problem. all the problem but not
explanations clearly.
for the solved
problem.

FACULTY IN-CHARGE

You might also like