See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/340098454

Machine Learning and Deep Learning Techniques for Cybersecurity: A Review

Chapter · March 2020

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-44289-7_5

CITATIONS READS

105 11,616

4 authors:

Said A. Salloum Muhammad Turki Alshurideh

University of Sharjah University of Sharjah and The University of Jordan
240 PUBLICATIONS 10,338 CITATIONS 487 PUBLICATIONS 14,993 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Ashraf M Elnagar Khaled Shaalan

University of Sharjah British University in Dubai
142 PUBLICATIONS 2,171 CITATIONS 380 PUBLICATIONS 11,944 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

All content following this page was uploaded by Said A. Salloum on 08 March 2021.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

 Machine Learning and Deep Learning
Techniques for Cybersecurity: A Review

Said A. Salloum1,2(&) , Muhammad Alshurideh3,4 ,

Ashraf Elnagar1,5 , and Khaled Shaalan2
1
Research Institute of Sciences and Engineering,
University of Sharjah, Sharjah, UAE
[email protected]
2
Faculty of Engineering and IT, The British University in Dubai, Dubai, UAE
3
Faculty of Business, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
4
Management Department, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, UAE
5
Department of Computer Science, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, UAE

Abstract. In this review, significant literature surveys on machine learning

(ML) and deep learning (DL) techniques for network analysis of intrusion
detection are explained. In addition, it presents a short tutorial explanation on
every ML/DL method. Data holds a significant position in ML/DL methods;
hence this paper highlights the datasets used in machine learning techniques,
which are the primary tools for analyzing network traffic and detecting abnor-
malities. In addition, we elaborate on the issues faced in using ML/DL for
cybersecurity and offer recommendations for future studies.

Keywords: Cyber security
Machine learning
Deep learning

1 Introduction

This paper takes into view the cyber security applications and presents the outcomes of a
literature survey of machine learning (ML), deep learning (DL), and data mining
(DM) methods. In addition, it explains the (ML/DL)/DM methods and their applications
to cyber intrusion detection issues. Besides providing a set of comparison criteria for
(ML/DL)/DM methods, the paper analyzes the complexity of different (ML/DL)/DM
algorithms. Subsequently, best methods and a set of recommendations are given subject
to the attributes of the cyber problem. The set of processes and technologies that are
formulated for the prevention of unauthorized access, attack, change, or destruction of
networks, computers, data and programs is referred to as the cyber security [1]. The
network security systems and computer (host) security systems basically make up the
cyber security systems. At least, a single antivirus software, firewall and an intrusion
detection system (IDS) must be included in each of these entities [1]. In addition to
identification, IDSs do discover and determine the unauthorized use, alteration, dupli-
cation and damage of information systems [2]. The internal intrusions (intra-organization
attacks) and external intrusions (inter-organization attacks) are known as the security
breaches. In sensing security threats, the artificial intelligent and machine learning based
methodologies have become an essential part of our lives because of the rise in the ratio of
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020
A.-E. Hassanien et al. (Eds.): AICV 2020, AISC 1153, pp. 50–57, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44289-7_5
 Machine Learning and Deep Learning Techniques for Cybersecurity 51

cyber-attacks [3]. The standards of security play an important role in the provision of the
best security applications keeping in view their implementation and security require-
ments. They are vital for cyber security research from this perspective, such as intrusion
detection system. While machine and deep learning algorithms and particular datasets can
be corroborated through some research studies, literature doesn’t contain much content
on the (ML/DL)/DM techniques for cyber security and security-related datasets.
While concentrating on the (ML/DL)/DM methods and their descriptions, the
(ML/DL)/DM techniques are focused by this survey paper aiming at cyber security.
Besides publication of several reviews [1, 3–7], many papers containing these methods
have also been published [8, 9]. Compared to earlier reviews, the publications fulfilling
certain criteria will be the major emphasis of our paper. The techniques, such as:
“machine learning” or “deep learning” and cybersecurity along with “data mining”
were used to perform Google Scholar queries. The highly cited papers containing well-
known techniques were among the main concerns. Nevertheless, there was a realization
that novel and innovative techniques would possibly be ignored; therefore a few of
these articles were also selected. By and large, selection of papers was done with a view
to incorporate at least one and preferably a few representative papers about each of the
(ML/DL)/DM categories. The remainder of this paper is organized as follows: Sect. 2
offered a summary of some relevant literature. Section 4 overviews different (ML/DL)/
DM methods used in cyber security. Section 4 discusses cybersecurity datasets for
(ML/DL)/DM and Sect. 5 concludes the paper with a brief summary of the paper’s key
points and other closing remarks.

2 Literature Review

With the assistance of computer software, an exclusive way to solve fundamental

scientific and engineering questions is provided by the machine learning applications
[10]. During last twenty years, radical advancements have been witnessed in the field of
machine learning with an easy access to the beginners [11]. A laboratory “black-box”
environment has basically triggered the machine learning, which has then transformed
into a practical application and commercial companies are progressively implementing
it on a large scale [10, 11]. The software applications computer vision [12, 13], natural
language processing [13–15], speech recognition [13–16], robot control [13, 17, 18]
and other emerging applications are the innovations of machine learning [10]. For
bringing improvements in user experience, to promote special offerings and suggest
purchases [10], machine learning is used by major companies such as Amazon,
Facebook and Google. Instead of programming the traditional input-process-output, it
is far easier for machine learning developers to train a system. They achieve it by
developing simulations of anticipated output [11]. Various industries have observed the
impact of machine learning in the shape of data-intensive issues, such as, cybersecurity
[10]. Some other fields ranging from biology [19–23] to cosmology to social science
[24–30] can also take advantages of Machine learning for bringing remarkable trans-
formations [11]. The experimental data can be processed and analyzed by machine
learning in new ways [11]. Theoretically, we can better understand the concepts of “big
data” by working on machine learning algorithms. Moreover, these technologies can be
52 S. A. Salloum et al.

employed to improve associated performance metrics in vertical applications. There

can be a great variation in the machine learning algorithms with respect to unique
functions (e.g., logistic regression, linear Regression, Naive Bayes, decision trees,
random forest, support vector machines, deep learning and Gradient Boosting algo-
rithms). Nevertheless, machine learning introduces creative ways to analyze huge
amounts of data with an aim to generate evolutionary approach. Moreover, greater
optimization can be provided by the successive generations of algorithms [11]. The
large volume of data can ideally be processed through machine learning and cyber-
security [11]. The platforms and networks are vulnerable to attack. The effectiveness of
these attacks depend on the number of tools to scan and evaluate targets [10]. Machine
learning is used by the adversaries to further increase their attacks. Recently, some
journals have published few surveys on the security perspective of machine learning
and artificial intelligence [4–6, 31, 32]. In addition, [4] emphasized on contemporary
literature on Intrusion Detection for computer network security and Machine Learning
Techniques used in Internet-of-Things. Subsequently, for network analysis of intrusion
detection, [6] explained key literature surveys on machine learning (ML) and deep
learning (DL) methods with an explanatory description of each ML/DL method.
During training and testing or inferring of machine learning from a data driven
view, a comprehensive literature review regarding defensive techniques and security
threats was presented by [5]. In addition, [31] briefed on security issues regarding
artificial intelligence, especially the reinforcement and supervised learning algorithms.
In contrast, updates on security issues and defensive methods in the life cycle of a
machine learning-based system from training to inference were reviewed by [32].

3 Classification of Machine Learning Algorithms

to Cybersecurity

3.1 Classical Machine Learning Techniques

Development of models receiving input data besides utilizing statistical analysis to
forecast an output value within an suitable range is the key objective of ML [3].
The ML is one of the rapidly growing areas with comprehensive applications in the
domain of computer science [3]. The supervised, unsupervised and Reinforcement
Learning are among the classifications of ML algorithms. The well-known procedures
used in the machine learning algorithms are none other than the supervised algorithms.
Furthermore, regression and classification are the further sub-divisions of supervised
algorithms. A number of machine learning algorithms are used in literature [33, 34].
The Logistic Regression [35], Decision Tree [36], Naive Bayes [35, 37, 38], SVM [35,
37, 39, 40], K-Means [38], KNN [37, 40] and Random Forest [41] are among the
commonly used machine-learning algorithms.
 Machine Learning and Deep Learning Techniques for Cybersecurity 53

3.2 Deep Learning Techniques

A new branch of machine learning, i.e., the deep learning has currently gained wide-
spread recognition and the same has been used for intrusion detection. Moreover,
traditional methods are outshined by the deep learning as per the findings of the studies
[8]. For flow-based anomaly detection, a deep learning approach subject to a deep
neural network has been utilized by the authors in [42]. According to the experimental
outcomes, anomaly detection in software defined networks can also be performed
through deep learning. In [43], using self-taught learning (STL) on the benchmark
NSL-KDD dataset, a deep learning based approach is proposed in a network intrusion
detection system. The technique is found to be more efficient in terms of its perfor-
mance as compared to those discussed in previous studies. Nonetheless, the feature
reduction ability of the deep learning is emphasized by this category of references. It
implements classification through the traditional supervision model and deep learning
methods are primarily used for pre-training. Applying the deep learning method to
directly perform classification is an unusual task, and literature is devoid of the studies
illustrating the performance in multiclass classification. The RNNs are believed to be
the reduced-size neural networks according to [31]. In this article, three-layer RNN
architecture was suggested for misuse-based IDs with 41 features as inputs and four
intrusion categories as outputs. The ability of deep learning for modeling high-
dimensional features is not exhibited by the reduced RNNs and the nodes of layers are
partially connected. The performance of the model in the binary classification is not
explored by the authors.
[8] learned to model an intrusion detection system on the basis of deep learning and
a deep learning approach was recommended for intrusion detection using recurrent
neural networks (RNN-IDS). Furthermore, the performance of the model in binary
classification and multiclass classification was also investigated. It was discovered that
the performance of the proposed model is affected by different learning rate and the
number of neurons. For modeling a classification model with high accuracy, the RNN-
IDS are found very suitable according to the experimental outcomes. In both multiclass
and binary classification, it depicts high performance than the traditional machine
learning classification methods. The RNN-IDS model offers a new research technique
for intrusion detection and the accuracy of the intrusion detection is also enhanced.

4 Cybersecurity Datasets

Currently, data is prepared by various research groups both for their own analysis and
for provision to community repositories [3]. Using machine learning and artificial
intelligent research, the present security-related datasets are explained by this section.

4.1 KDD Cup 1999 Dataset

The data obtained from MIT Lincoln Labs entails BSM list files and tcpdump in addition
to KDD Cup 1999 [3]. The data captured in DARPA’98 IDS evaluation program
contributed to this particular dataset [11]. For assessment of intrusion detection systems,
54 S. A. Salloum et al.

this dataset is also considered as benchmark data. One of the renowned data sets to
assess performance of anomaly detection methods is none other than the KDD’99 [3].
Presently, KDD dataset is being used by various researchers [38, 44–46]

4.2 ISOT (Information Security and Object Technology) Dataset

The openly available botnets and normal datasets comprising of 1,675,424 total traffic
flow collectively formulate the ISOT dataset. As far as malicious traffic in ISOT is
concerned, the same was acquired from French chapter of honeynet project encom-
passing Storm and Waledac botnets [3, 35, 47, 48].

4.3 HTTP CSIC 2010 Dataset

Thousands of web requests automatically generated and developed at Information
Security Institute of CSIC (Spanish Research National Council) are collectively known
as HTTP CSIC 2010 dataset [3]. The web attack protection systems can be tested
through this dataset. Nearly 6,000 normal requests and above 25,000 anomalous
requests formulate this data. Moreover, HTTP requests are labeled as anomalous or
normal [3]. The web detection in [49–51] is successfully accomplished through this
dataset.

4.4 CTU-13 (Czech Technical University) Dataset

The mixture of seizures of 13 different malwares in a nonfictional network environment
is referred to as the CTU-13 (Czech Technical University) dataset. This dataset aims to
acquire real mixed botnet traffic. Foregoing in view, normal traffic is generated by
verified normal hosts, while botnet traffic is generated by Infected hosts [3]. This
dataset is a carefully labeled dataset capturing the procedures carried out in a controlled
environment, which is one of the benefits of using it [39, 40, 48, 52].

4.5 UNSW-NB15 Dataset

In the Cyber Range Lab of the Australian Centre for Cyber Security (ACCS), the IXIA
Perfect Storm tool has reportedly generated the UNSW-NB15 Dataset [3]. Nearly one
hour of anonymized traffic traces from a DDoS attack in 2007 are included in this dataset
[47, 49, 53]. This dataset entails nine types of major attacks, including Fuzzers, Back-
doors, Analysis, Exploits, DoS, Reconnaissance, Generic, Worms and Shellcode [3].

5 Conclusion and Future Work

One of the key issues for national and international security is the safety of computer
systems from cyber-attacks. With numerous machine learning techniques, a survey on
security concerns has been presented in this article. Several datasets have been
employed to conduct various researches. In addition, a significant role in protection
of computer systems is performed by machine learning and artificial intelligence.
 Machine Learning and Deep Learning Techniques for Cybersecurity 55

The literature review of ML/DL and DM methods used for cyber is explained by this
paper. The example papers explaining various ML/DL and DM techniques in the cyber
domain were carefully found and widespread classes of various datasets have been
defined along with their advantages and disadvantages. We aim to generate new dataset
in the future, which will be open to all.

References
1. Buczak, A.L., Guven, E.: A survey of data mining and machine learning methods for cyber
security intrusion detection. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 18(2), 1153–1176 (2015)
2. Mukkamala, S., Sung, A., Abraham, A.: Cyber security challenges: designing efficient
intrusion detection systems and antivirus tools. In: Vemuri, V.R. (ed.) Enhancing Computer
Security with Smart Technology 2006, pp. 125–163 (2005)
3. Yavanoglu, O., Aydos, M.: A review on cyber security datasets for machine learning
algorithms. In: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data), pp. 2186–2193
(2017)
4. da Costa, K.A.P., Papa, J.P., Lisboa, C.O., Munoz, R., de Albuquerque, V.H.C.: Internet of
Things: a survey on machine learning-based intrusion detection approaches. Comput. Netw.
151, 147–157 (2019)
5. Liu, Q., Li, P., Zhao, W., Cai, W., Yu, S., Leung, V.C.M.: A survey on security threats and
defensive techniques of machine learning: a data driven view. IEEE Access 6, 12103–12117
(2018)
6. Xin, Y., et al.: Machine learning and deep learning methods for cybersecurity. IEEE Access
6, 35365–35381 (2018)
7. Dua, S., Du, X.: Data Mining and Machine Learning in Cybersecurity. Auerbach
Publications (2016)
8. Yin, C., Zhu, Y., Fei, J., He, X.: A deep learning approach for intrusion detection using
recurrent neural networks. IEEE Access 5, 21954–21961 (2017)
9. Xiao, L., Wan, X., Lu, X., Zhang, Y., Wu, D.: IoT security techniques based on machine
learning (2018). arXiv Prepr. arXiv:1801.06275
10. Jordan, M.I., Mitchell, T.M.: Machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects. Science
(80-.) 349(6245), 255–260 (2015)
11. Fraley, J.B., Cannady, J.: The promise of machine learning in cybersecurity. SoutheastCon
2017, 1–6 (2017)
12. Alazab, M., Tang, M.: Deep Learning Applications for Cyber Security. Springer, Heidelberg
(2019)
13. Li, J.: Cyber security meets artificial intelligence: a survey. Front. Inf. Technol. Electron.
Eng. 19(12), 1462–1474 (2018)
14. Jones, C.L., Bridges, R.A., Huffer, K.M.T., Goodall, J.R.: Towards a relation extraction
framework for cyber-security concepts. In: Proceedings of the 10th Annual Cyber and
Information Security Research Conference, p. 11 (2015)
15. McNeil, N., Bridges, R.A., Iannacone, M.D., Czejdo, B., Perez, N., Goodall, J.R.: Pace:
pattern accurate computationally efficient bootstrapping for timely discovery of cyber-
security concepts. In: 2013 12th International Conference on Machine Learning and
Applications, vol. 2, pp. 60–65 (2013)
16. Zhang, Q., Man, D., Yang, W.: Using HMM for intent recognition in cyber security situation
awareness. In: 2009 Second International Symposium on Knowledge Acquisition and
Modeling, vol. 2, pp. 166–169 (2009)
56 S. A. Salloum et al.

17. Bonaci, T., Herron, J., Yusuf, T., Yan, J., Kohno, T., Chizeck, H.J.: To make a robot secure:
an experimental analysis of cyber security threats against teleoperated surgical robots (2015).
arXiv Prepr. arXiv:1504.04339
18. Hacioglu, U., Sevgilioglu, G.: The evolving role of automated systems and its cyber-security
issue for global business operations in Industry 4.0. Int. J. Bus. Ecosyst. Strategy 1(1), 1–11
(2019)
19. Alhashmi, S.F.S., Salloum, S.A., Abdallah, S.: Critical success factors for implementing
artificial intelligence (AI) projects in Dubai government United Arab Emirates (UAE) health
sector: applying the extended technology acceptance model (TAM). In: International
Conference on Advanced Intelligent Systems and Informatics, pp. 393–405 (2019)
20. Darwish, A., Ezzat, D., Hassanien, A.E.: An optimized model based on convolutional neural
networks and orthogonal learning particle swarm optimization algorithm for plant diseases
diagnosis. Swarm Evol. Comput. 52, 100616 (2020)
21. Abdelghafar, S., Darwish, A., Hassanien, A.E.: Intelligent health monitoring systems for
space missions based on data mining techniques. In: Machine Learning and Data Mining in
Aerospace Technology, pp. 65–78. Springer (2020)
22. Elsayad, D., Ali, A., Shedeed, H.A., Tolba, M.F.: PAGeneRN: parallel architecture for gene
regulatory network. In: Data Analytics in Medicine: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and
Applications, pp. 1052–1075. IGI Global (2020)
23. Pacheco, A.G.C., Ali, A.-R., Trappenberg, T.: Skin cancer detection based on deep learning
and entropy to detect outlier samples (2019). arXiv Prepr. arXiv:1909.04525
24. Salloum, S.A., Al-Emran, M., Monem, A., Shaalan, K.: A survey of text mining in social
media: facebook and twitter perspectives. Adv. Sci. Technol. Eng. Syst. J. 2(1), 127–133
(2017)
25. Alomari, K.M., AlHamad, A.Q., Salloum, S.: Prediction of the digital game rating systems
based on the ESRB. Opción 35(19), 1368–1393 (2019)
26. Salloum, S.A., Al-Emran, M., Shaalan, K.: Mining social media text: extracting knowledge
from facebook. Int. J. Comput. Digit. Syst. 6(2), 73–81 (2017)
27. Salloum, S.A., Al-Emran, M., Abdallah, S., Shaalan, K.: Analyzing the Arab Gulf
newspapers using text mining techniques. In: International Conference on Advanced
Intelligent Systems and Informatics, pp. 396–405 (2017)
28. Salloum, S.A., Al-Emran, M., Shaalan, K.: Mining text in news channels: a case study from
facebook. Int. J. Inf. Technol. Lang. Stud. 1(1), 1–9 (2017)
29. Salloum, S.A., AlHamad, A.Q., Al-Emran, M., Shaalan, K.: A survey of Arabic text mining,
vol. 740 (2018)
30. Salloum, S.A., Mhamdi, C., Al-Emran, M., Shaalan, K.: Analysis and classification of
Arabic newspapers’ facebook pages using text mining techniques. Int. J. Inf. Technol. Lang.
Stud. 1(2), 8–17 (2017)
31. Amodei, D., Olah, C., Steinhardt, J., Christiano, P., Schulman, J., Mané, D.: Concrete
problems in AI safety (2016). arXiv Prepr. arXiv:1606.06565
32. Papernot, N., McDaniel, P., Sinha, A., Wellman, M.: Towards the science of security and
privacy in machine learning (2016). arXiv Prepr. arXiv:1611.03814
33. Feily, M., Shahrestani, A., Ramadass, S.: A survey of botnet and botnet detection. In: 2009
Third International Conference on Emerging Security Information, Systems and Technolo-
gies, pp. 268–273 (2009)
34. Ben Salem, M., Hershkop, S., Stolfo, S.J.: A survey of insider attack detection research. In:
Insider Attack and Cyber Security, pp. 69–90. Springer (2008)
35. Bhamare, D., Salman, T., Samaka, M., Erbad, A., Jain, R.: Feasibility of supervised machine
learning for cloud security. In: 2016 International Conference on Information Science and
Security (ICISS), pp. 1–5 (2016)
 Machine Learning and Deep Learning Techniques for Cybersecurity 57

36. Gallagher, B., Eliassi-Rad, T.: Classification of http attacks: a study on the ECML/PKDD
2007 discovery challenge. Lawrence Livermore National Lab. (LLNL), Livermore, CA
(United States) (2009)
37. Haddadi, F., Le Cong, D., Porter, L., Zincir-Heywood, A.N.: On the effectiveness of
different botnet detection approaches. In: International Conference on Information Security
Practice and Experience, pp. 121–135 (2015)
38. Xie, M., Hu, J., Slay, J.: Evaluating host-based anomaly detection systems: application of the
one-class SVM algorithm to ADFA-LD. In: 2014 11th International Conference on Fuzzy
Systems and Knowledge Discovery (FSKD), pp. 978–982 (2014)
39. Kato, K., Klyuev, V.: An intelligent DDoS attack detection system using packet analysis and
support vector machine. In: IJICR, pp. 478–485 (2014)
40. Yusof, A.R., Udzir, N.I., Selamat, A.: An evaluation on KNN-SVM algorithm for detection
and prediction of DDoS attack. In: International Conference on Industrial, Engineering and
Other Applications of Applied Intelligent Systems, pp. 95–102 (2016)
41. Hasan, M.A.M., Nasser, M., Ahmad, S., Molla, K.I.: Feature selection for intrusion detection
using random forest. J. Inf. Secur. 7(03), 129 (2016)
42. Javaid, A., Niyaz, Q., Sun, W., Alam, M.: A deep learning approach for network intrusion
detection system. In: Proceedings of the 9th EAI International Conference on Bio-inspired
Information and Communications Technologies (formerly BIONETICS), pp. 21–26 (2016)
43. Tang, T.A., Mhamdi, L., McLernon, D., Zaidi, S.A.R., Ghogho, M.: Deep learning approach
for network intrusion detection in software defined networking. In: 2016 International
Conference on Wireless Networks and Mobile Communications (WINCOM), pp. 258–263
(2016)
44. Chowdhury, S., et al.: Botnet detection using graph-based feature clustering. J. Big Data 4
(1), 14 (2017)
45. Neethu, B.: Adaptive intrusion detection using machine learning. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Netw.
Secur. 13(3), 118 (2013)
46. Kozik, R., Choraś, M., Renk, R., Hołubowicz, W.: A proposal of algorithm for web
applications cyber attack detection. In: IFIP International Conference on Computer
Information Systems and Industrial Management, pp. 680–687 (2015)
47. Lippmann, R., Haines, J.W., Fried, D.J., Korba, J., Das, K.: The 1999 DARPA off-line
intrusion detection evaluation. Comput. Netw. 34(4), 579–595 (2000)
48. Saad, S., et al.: Detecting P2P botnets through network behavior analysis and machine
learning. In: 2011 Ninth Annual International Conference on Privacy, Security and Trust,
pp. 174–180 (2011)
49. Torrano-Gimenez, C., Perez-Villegas, A., Alvarez, G.: A self-learning anomaly-based web
application firewall. In: Computational Intelligence in Security for Information Systems,
pp. 85–92. Springer (2009)
50. Torrano-Gimenez, C., Pérez-Villegas, A., Álvarez, G., Fernández-Medina, E., Malek, M.,
Hernando, J.: An anomaly-based web application firewall. In: SECRYPT, pp. 23–28 (2009)
51. Nguyen, H.T., Torrano-Gimenez, C., Alvarez, G., Petrović, S., Franke, K.: Application of
the generic feature selection measure in detection of web attacks. In: Computational
Intelligence in Security for Information Systems, pp. 25–32. Springer (2011)
52. Hoque, N., Bhattacharyya, D.K., Kalita, J.K.: A novel measure for low-rate and high-rate
DDoS attack detection using multivariate data analysis. In: 2016 8th International
Conference on Communication Systems and Networks (COMSNETS), pp. 1–2 (2016)
53. Torrano-Giménez, C., Perez-Villegas, A., Alvarez Maranón, G.: An anomaly-based
approach for intrusion detection in web traffic (2010)

View publication stats