Lab Report: CLO 2, CLO 3 & CLO 4 UniKL MICET

CCB 10402 Chemical Engineering Laboratory 1

Group: Date of Submission:

Experiment:
Group member: 1. 3.
2. 4.
CLO 2 : Apply the knowledge acquired in previous mathematics, science and chemical engineering courses to analyze and
interpret information acquired by operating process equipment.
PLO 1 : Engineering Knowledge
0 1 2 3
Criteria Marks
Poor Satisfactory Good Excellent
There are inadequate There are sufficient Mathematics, science
There is no evidence that mathematics, science and mathematics, science and engineering theories
mathematics, science and engineering theories and and engineering theories and principals are clearly
engineering theories and principals to solve the and principals to solve explained and applied to
principals are considered. complex engineering the complex engineering solve complex
Introduction and
problem. problem. engineering problem.
theory
Introduction is complete
The background information The background information Introduction is nearly and well-written; provides
provided is very limited or is provided but some major complete, only missing all necessary background
incorrect. points are missing. some minor points. principles for the
experiment.
Written in paragraph
Written in paragraph format Well-written in paragraph
Several important experimental format and important
but still missing some format and all
Experimental method details are missing or not experimental details are
important experimental experimental details are
written in paragraph format. covered, but some minor
details. covered.
details are missing.

Total (a) /9

Total (a) * 15%

/ 15
9
CLO 3 : Analyze the experimental data obtained from the conducted experiments.
PLO 2 : Problem Analysis
0 1 2 3
Criteria Marks
Poor Satisfactory Good Excellent
Analysis of data & Analysis of data &
Analysis of data & information Analysis of data &
information towards the information towards the
Results towards the experiment are information towards the
experiment are limited and experiment are strongly
significantly below expectation. experiment are sufficient.
unclear. sufficient.
Discussion Incomplete or incorrect Some of the results have Most of the results have All important trends and
interpretation of trends and been correctly interpreted been correctly interpreted data comparisons have
comparison of data indicating and discussed but and discussed, only been interpreted correctly

1|Page March 2024

Lab Report: CLO 2, CLO 3 & CLO 4 UniKL MICET
CCB 10402 Chemical Engineering Laboratory 1

and discussed, good

the lack of understanding the incomplete or partially minor improvements are
understanding of results
results. understanding the results. needed.
is conveyed.
Figures, graphs, tables contain All figures, graphs, tables
Most figures, graphs, tables All figures, graphs, tables
errors or are poorly constructed are presented correctly,
Figures, graphs, are presented correctly but are correctly drawn,
where the titles, captions, but some minor features
tables, etc. some important or required numbered and contain
numbers and units are missing are missing and can be
features are missing. correct titles/captions.
or incorrect. improved.
The major points of the All important points in
All important points in
conclusions are provided but conclusions have been
Conclusions are missing of the conclusions have been
Conclusions most are wrongly stated, clearly stated, students
important points. provided, but
indicating lack of show good
improvement is needed.
understanding. understanding

Total (b) / 12

Total (b) * 20%

/ 20
12
CLO 4 : Produce and present laboratory reports formatively.
PLO 9 : Communication (Written)
0 1 2 3
Criteria Marks
Poor Satisfactory Good Excellent
Several major aspects of the Abstract represents most Abstract represents all
Abstract missed one or more
experiment are missing, student of the major aspects of major aspects of the
Abstract major aspects of the
displays lack of understanding the experiment, some experiment and the
experiment and the results.
on how to write an abstract. minor details are missing. results are well-written.
Occasional grammar/spelling
Frequent grammar and/or Less than 3 grammar or All grammar and spelling
Spelling, grammar, errors, generally readable
spelling errors, writing style is spelling errors, mature, are correct and very well-
sentence structure with some rough spots in
rough and immature. readable style. written.
writing style.
Sections in order, contains
Sections out of order, too much the minimum allowable All sections in order,
Appearance and All sections in order, well-
handwritten copy, sloppy amount of handwritten copy, formatting generally good
formatting formatted, very readable.
formatting. formatting is rough but but can still be improved.
readable.
All references are clearly
All references are nicely
References No references. References are poorly cited. numbered and cited
numbered and cited.
according to classification

Total (c)

Total (c) * 10%

/ 10
12

2|Page March 2024