The Impact of Social Media On Mental Health - Is Regulation Necessary
The Impact of Social Media On Mental Health - Is Regulation Necessary
The Impact of Social Media On Mental Health - Is Regulation Necessary
Social media has become an important part of our everyday life, and its complexities, as well
as what many believe to be its demerits have led to talks about imposing regulations on social
media usage. However, these regulations are not without their cons either, as they lead to loss
expression. The increase in social media usage during the Covid-19 pandemic in 2020 is
Statista, the average time users in the US spent on social media in 2020 was 65 minutes daily,
an increase from the 56 minutes recorded in the previous year (Dixon, 2023, para 1). This
increased usage is linked to social support provided by these platforms during the pandemic
and helped to reduce the social isolation and loneliness that the pandemic and resulting
lockdown caused people. Although several studies link increased social media usage with
depression, anxiety, and other mental health problems, the COVID-19 pandemic showed that
social media can also be harnessed for providing mental health support, as several users
turned to social media for emotional support during the crisis. So, despite concerns about the
impact of social media on mental health, imposing regulatory measures would impede the
freedom of expression, social connectivity, and the mental health support that these platforms
Social media allows people to exercise their rights to freedom of expression. Freedom of
expression is a fundamental human right important to the progress of any society, especially
under a democratic government. However, before the advent of social media, many people
struggled to find their voices and express themselves how they wanted to be heard. In this
we’ve seen users on different social media platforms voice their opinions on different civil
and civic issues, mobilize for social causes, and hold individuals and institutions accountable.
For instance, the Black Lives Matter movement in the US and the End SARS movement in
Nigeria are two civil movements that started on social media and gained global recognition
for their fight against systemic racism and for preserving the lives of a teeming youth
population respectively. None of this would have been possible with social media regulation
in place. The ability to express oneself freely on social media is not merely a privilege but a
crucial mechanism for civic engagement and democratic participation, and regulation robs
users of this (Slutskiy, 2020). With their freedom of expression, citizens can demand
accountability and transparency from their elected leaders and hold them to their words.
Without this ability to speak freely and critique or challenge authority, the potential for abuse
Social media also play a vital role in creating social connections and building communities.
We live in a digitally connected world, and this is made obvious by the importance of social
media in our daily conversations. Beyond its use for creating and sharing content, social
media is how we connect, communicate, and build communities where individuals from
different walks of life, regardless of their geographical location, can come together,
exchange ideas, and forge meaningful connections based on shared interests and hobbies
(Ellison et al., 2014). People can make new acquaintances and stay in touch with old friends
and families across the globe, fostering a sense of closeness and intimacy, even in the
absence of physical proximity. Beyond individual relationships, social media also allow
people to feel a sense of community and belonging, and this is important for people who are
marginalized and would ordinarily fit in nowhere. The presence of communities, groups, and
forums on these platforms allows people with like minds to share their passions and interests.
Communities like this provide support for one another, allowing people to be themselves and
feel accepted for who they are. This is a crucial lifeline for individuals and groups, such as
the LGBTQ+ community, that are marginalized and discriminated against in their daily lives,
as they can find somewhere they feel welcome and supported, and have a sense of belonging
that’s lacking in their lives. Social media provides a platform for people to find their tribe and
cultivate meaningful relationships without the location barrier. However, this may not be
possible with regulations due to the many barriers and restrictions that will be put in place.
Social media provides mental health support for people living with mental disorders. These
platforms can serve as a gateway to a plethora of mental health resources, such as informative
articles, self-help guides, and online therapy platforms, capable of making life easy for people
with mental illnesses. Studies show that people with mental illnesses appear to be active on
social media sharing their personal experiences, seeking information and treatment options
for their condition, and giving and receiving support from other people in a similar situation
(Naslund et al., 2020, p. 2). For individuals who may not have access to traditional mental
health services due to financial, geographical, or logistical barriers, social media offers a
lifeline. Online support groups, forums, and communities provide a safe space for individuals
to seek advice, share their experiences, and connect with others who understand what they are
going through. Hence, while many authors point out a link between social media usage and
mental illnesses in the users, people living with these disorders benefit from social media,
using it for increased social interactions, access to peer networks, and engagement and
retention services (Naslund et al., 2020, p. 4,5,6). Regulating social media on the basis of
the article, ‘Children and Adolescents and Digital Media,’ by Reid et al., there's a link
between excessive exposure to media and viewing TV in early childhood and delays in
cognitive, social, emotional, and language use (Reid et al., 2016, p. 6). The study also noted
that there is a link between tobacco or alcohol usage, and inappropriate sexual behaviors in
teenagers and their exposure to TV or movie content where these behaviors are showcased (p.
8). Hence, a crucial step in protecting this young and vulnerable population from harmful
content and bullying that affects their mental health is to regulate the media. It's also worth
noting that regulation can help curb the spread of misinformation and disinformation on
social media, which can contribute to anxiety, stress, and confusion among users. According
to Reviglio and Agosti (2020), social media algorithms are created to autonomously explore
strategies that are manipulative and detrimental to social media users (p. 3). So, another
crucial point to note is that regulation can hold social media platforms accountable for the
content they host and the algorithms they use, ensuring that they prioritize user well-being
over engagement metrics. Social media platforms should be held accountable for the
algorithms that they use and the content hosted on their platforms, and this can be achieved
Regulating social media usage does not improve the user’s mental health. In an article
reviewing several studies to determine the effectiveness of social media use intervention on
mental health, Plackett et al., (2023) found that the interventions restricting social media
usage or imposing full abstinence on users may not be as beneficial for the user’s mental
used established approaches, such as CBT-based techniques and counseling to encourage the
subjects to be more mindful and reflect on how their activity on social media affects their
emotions, thoughts, and actions. Overall, the findings from this study suggest that healthcare
professionals, public health bodies, and mental health charity organizations should adopt and
suggest that strictly reducing social media usage doesn’t offer substantial benefit to a
person’s mental well-being, hence, social media regulation may not effectively address the
root causes of mental health issues associated with social media. Rather than impose
restrictions and regulations on social media usage, promoting individual responsibility and
digital literacy may be more effective in mitigating the negative effects of social media than
regulation. This ensures that every individual is well-trained on the pros and cons of social
media use, especially how it affects their mental health, and they take responsibility for
preventing the negative impacts of social media. This way, more people are protected from
the demerits of social media and can continue to enjoy its merits without the negative impact
Social media have become an important part of our lives, and that cannot be taken away.
While there may be concerns about how it negatively impacts the users’ mental health,
imposing regulatory measures also has detrimental effects, such as impeding the freedom of
expression, social connectivity, and the mental health support that these platforms offer, and
this outweighs any potential benefits of the regulations. While much is being said about the
impact of social media on mental health and the need for regulation, there is also evidence
pointing out that social media helps people living with mental disorders. Ultimately, personal
responsibility is key to mitigating the negative effects of social media usage. Users should be
mindful of how they use social media by ensuring it isn't affecting their mental health, and
seek support when needed. This is a more effective ‘regulation’ than government-imposed
regulations.
Reflection Questions
1. How much time did you spend revising your draft? What revision strategies did
you use, and which worked best for you? (2-3 sentences)
I started by reading the feedback and then the draft and highlighted the places that
needed the most revisiting based on the feedback. Highlighting them allowed me to
go over each one and make the necessary changes, and then I checked with the
feedback for correctness. I made sure to take breaks in between working on the
draft so that I have fresh eyes each time I go back to it. Cumulatively, it took me
over 15 hours to completely revise my draft.
2. List three concrete revisions that you made and explain how you made them.
What problem did you fix with each of these revisions? Issues may be unity,
cohesion, rhetorical appeals, content, or any other areas on which you received
constructive feedback. (4-5 sentences)
The major revision that I made was completely rewriting my first three body
paragraphs with newer points to support my argument based on the feedback I got.
Another feedback was contextualizing my supporting sources and ensuring that i
don’t write a cited sentence after another but each cited sentence is explained by the
following sentences. Lastly, I used 13 sources in my initial draft, so I had to reduce
the number of sources to 7 based on the feedback. This was to ensure my essay
doesn’t rely too heavily on source support.
3. What did you learn about your writing process or yourself as a writer? How has
your understanding of the research process changed as a result of taking this
course? (2-3 sentences)
One major lesson I’ve learnt from this process is the importance of having strong
points and developing them well enough to support my thesis. I’ve also learnt from
the feedback and revision process that your research is only as good as your
knowledge of the topic. So, the first step to writing a good essay is to understand
the topic completely.
References
Dixon S (2023, December 18) Social media use during COVID-19 worldwide - statistics &
media-use-during-coronavirus-covid-19-worldwide/#topicOverview
Ellison, N. B., Vitak, J., Gray, R., & Lampe, C. (2014). Cultivating social resources on social
network sites: Facebook relationship maintenance behaviors and their role in social capital
Naslund, J. A., Bondre, A., Torous, J., & Aschbrenner, K. A. (2020). Social media and
mental health: benefits, risks, and opportunities for research and practice. Journal of
Plackett, R., Blyth, A., & Schartau, P. (2023). The Impact of Social Media Use Interventions
e44922.
Reid Chassiakos, Y. L., Radesky, J., Christakis, D., Moreno, M. A., Cross, C., Hill, D., ... &
Swanson, W. S. (2016). Children and adolescents and digital media. Pediatrics, 138(5).
Reviglio, U., & Agosti, C. (2020). Thinking outside the black-box: The case for “algorithmic
https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120915613
Slutskiy, P. (2020). Freedom of expression, social media censorship, and property rights.