Poverty and Inequality
Poverty and Inequality
7.0 OBJECTIVES
After going through this unit, you should be able to:
• describe the concepts of poverty and inequality;
• distinguish between poverty and inequality;
• identify the need for studying gender equality and poverty with economic
growth;
• explain whether economic growth reduces poverty and gender inequality;
and
• describe the linkages between inequality and poverty.
7.1 INTRODUCTION
Human beings have always endeavoured to improve their quality of life. The
advancements made in the field of science and technology, particularly during
past two centuries have impacted human life in the most unusually way. This has
helped societies achieve stupendous economic progress categorically in the
countries of the North America and Europe among others. Lately, economies in
Asia and Africa have also experienced economic growth and development
102
benefitting their people in multiple ways. However, the economic progress has Poverty and
Inequality
not been quite equitable. Certain sections of society, mainly due to social
hierarchy, have been able to reap greater benefits than others, eventually leading
to economic inequalities. People, relatively less equipped with good education,
appropriate training and relevant skill have not been able to contribute
quantitatively and/ or qualitatively, and therefore, have remained economically
poor. Historical exploitation of certain sections of the society by the dominant
and privileged people has widened the gap between haves and have-nots and
thrown the less privileged into absolute poverty. M. K. Gandhi once said,
“Poverty is the worst form of violence.”
According to the World Bank, there were 736 million poor in the world in 2015.
Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asian countries house around three-fourth of the
total poor population in the world. About half (368 million) of the total poor in
the world live in just 5 countries – India (24 per cent), Nigeria (12 per cent),
Democratic Republic of Congo (7 per cent), Ethiopia (4 per cent) and Bangladesh
(3 per cent). With sustained efforts of the World Bank, the United Nations
Development Program (UNDP), national governments and numerous
development agencies, the extent of absolute poverty globally has been steadily
falling. However, the Covid-19 led pandemic is likely to impact this trend in
poverty reduction in the vulnerable countries. Therefore, poverty elimination has
remained a major challenge right before the developing countries.
Thus, we can say that 23.5 per cent people in the locality are poor. A major
limitation of this approach is that it does not take into account the intensity of
poverty, that is, how severe is poverty among people.
7.3.2 Poverty Line
In India poverty was defined initially in terms of energy requirement to enable a
person lead an active and healthy life. The energy norm during the 1950s was
2900 kilo calorie (Kcal) per day for rural areas and 2400 kilo calorie per day for
urban areas. Based on this norm, it was estimated that Rs. 20 per person per
month (1961-62 prices) was required for a person in rural area. The
corresponding figure for urban areas was Rs. 25 per person per month. These
figures defined the poverty line. Thus, if a person in rural areas earned less than
Rs. 20 per month (below Rs. 25 per month for urban areas), he was considered to
be below the poverty line.
Later, during the 1980s, the calorie requirement was reduced to 2400 Kcal per
day for rural areas and 2100 Kcal for urban areas. Due to inflation in the
economy, the poverty line figures were revised to Rs. 49 per capita per month for
rural areas and Rs. 57 per capita per month for urban areas. The poverty line was
estimated on the basis of consumption requirements. It did not include other
essential items required for an active and healthy life.
During 2004-05, apart from energy requirement, five non-food items were also
taken into consideration for estimation of poverty line. Accordingly, poverty line
was defined as Rs. 720 per capita per month for rural areas Rs. 840 per capita per
month for urban areas. Such estimates of poverty line continued for many years.
Percentage of population below poverty line was also estimated on the basis of
such poverty lines. The Planning Commission of India released the estimates of
persons below poverty line till 2011-12, after which the practice was
discontinued.
7.3.3 Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI)
Over time it was perceived that poverty is strongly linked with many other
economic and social variables. A poor person is deprived of not only food, but
also of education, health, housing and durable assets. Thus poverty is
106
multidimensional in nature. In order to measure poverty a comprehensive index Poverty and
Inequality
is required, which will measure deprivation of people from consumption of
essential goods and services. Such thoughts gave rise to the concept of
Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI).
MPI was first released by the Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative
(OPHI) and the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) in 2010. Since
then the OPHI has been bringing out MPI which gives the poverty index for India
as a whole. Recently, in 2021, the NITI Aayog has brought out the baseline
report on multidimensional poverty index in India. This report presents the
multidimensional poverty index for the states and union territories of India.
As per the MPI, there are three important dimensions of poverty: (i) Health, (ii)
Education and (iii) Standard of Living. Under the category ‘health’, we consider
nutrition, child mortality and antenatal care. Under the category ‘education’ we
consider years of schooling and school attendance. For determination of the
standard of living, we consider seven criteria: (i) cooking fuel, (ii) sanitation, (iii)
drinking water, (iv) electricity, (v) housing, (vi) assets, and (vii) bank account.
According to the MPI report, the percentage of poor in certain states is very high
in 2021. For example: Bihar (51.91%), Jharkhand (42.16%), Uttar Pradesh
(37.79%) and Madhya Pradesh (36.65%). On the other hand, certain states have
relatively low levels of poverty. For example: Kerala (0.71%), Goa (3.76%),
Sikkim (3.82%), Tamil Nadu (4.89%) and Punjab (5.59%).
107
Issues in Indian (ii) Social Factors
Economy
Indian society is hierarchical in nature. It is dominated by caste system,
discriminatory inheritance laws, and rigid traditions have directly or indirectly
aggravated the problem of poverty in the country. Caste-based occupational
reservation in India has discouraged people from learning skill sets and venture
into the labour market on the basis of efficiency. There is discrimination against
women in Indian society. Education of girl child is an important factor in this
context. Further, there is a need to change our mindset, as certain families do not
allow women to work outside.
(iii) High Population Growth
As per the Population Census of India, population in India was around 36 crores
in 1951 but increased to around 121 crores in 2011. India is the second most
populous country in the world after China. Population in India has increased over
two per cent per annum during the last half a decade. On an average, about 17
million people are added every year to the population of the country. In 2011,
population of India at 1210.8 millions, was almost equal to combined population
of the United States, Indonesia, Brazil, Pakistan, Bangladesh and Japan put
together. The population of India increased by more than 181 million during the
decade 2001-11. The estimated population of India in 2022 is 135 crores.
High population growth has increased the burden on the natural resources.
Population growth increases demographic pressure on land, resulting into
fragmentation of landholding, and ‘disguised unemployment’. It leads to reduced
agricultural productivity and fall in income of farmers. Marginal farmers,
particularly with large family size, use traditional methods of cultivation on their
fragmented land holdings. Indian cities and towns have neither been able to
provide enough jobs nor a decent living for the migrant workers. During 2001-
11, certain states registered low population growth (for example, Kerala, Andhra
Pradesh, Odisha, West Bengal, Punjab and Himachal Pradesh) while certain
states (such as Bihar, Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh and
Madhya Pradesh) recorded high population growth rate.
(iv) Low Level Literacy
Illiteracy is a major cause of poverty. According to the United Nations Children’s
Fund (UNICEF), “About 25 per cent of children in India have no access to
education”. According to a study in the medical journal The Lancet, “44.5 per
cent of girls are still married in India before they are of legal age”. The illiterate
people – for not possessing relevant skill and education – are trapped in a vicious
cycle of poverty. The illiterate people end up with petty jobs, usually employed
in informal sector, and are paid poorly. As per Census 2011, literacy rate at all
India level was 72.98 per cent. There is a wide gap in the literacy rate for females
(64.63 per cent) and males (80.9 per cent). Education of the girl child again is the
need of the hour.
108
(v) Inflationary Pressure Poverty and
Inequality
High rate of inflation adversely affect the purchasing power of people. The
annual inflation rate in India has remained over 5 per cent. The lower economic
stratum of people is hit hard when prices of food grains, fuel and edible oil
exceed the rise in income levels. They find it difficult to get their minimum needs
fulfilled. For example, India, after Green Revolution, has become self-sufficient
and self-reliant in food grain production. The increase in food production
however has not increased the food availability for the poor in the country.
(vi) Unemployment
Indian economy has structural bottlenecks that hinder economic development.
This results in structural unemployment, seasonal unemployment as well as
disguised unemployment. Half of India’s population still depend on agriculture
and allied activities for livelihood. Employment opportunities are limited in
urban areas as well. Non-agricultural sector (industries and services) has not been
able to absorb the unemployed people.
(vii) Lack of Investment
India is a capital scare and labour abundant country. Lack of capital reduces the
extent of investment. During the early years after independence, the Government
used to invest heavily in key sectors including minerals and metals, transport and
communication, health and education, among others. Unfortunately, Foreign
Exchange Regulation Act (FERA), Monopolistic and Restrictive Trade Practices
(MRTP) Act, Industrial Licensing and high tax regime kept the private sector
from participating in the industrial development of the country. So, whatever
little investment was seen in the country, it prioritized select industrial and/urban
clusters. Restricted or limited availability of credit/capital for investment in
industries discouraged entrepreneurship in the country. The shortage of supply of
capital made it difficult for production and reduced employment opportunities in
the private sector particularly for the poor.
(viii) Regional Imbalance
There is regional imbalance in distribution of income and wealth in India. We
observe disparities across states in per capita income in India. Two major features
are observed so far as regional disparities is concerned. One, there is wide
disparity across states in per capita income. Sates such as Punjab, Haryana, Goa
and Karnataka have very high per capita income while states such as Bihar, Uttar
Pradesh, Jharkhand, Manipur and Madhya Pradesh have very low per capita
income. Second, the gap between rich and poor states is widening over time.
While rich states are getting richer, poor states are getting poorer.
The north-eastern states in India, popularly known as the Seven Sisters, despite
being endowed with abundant natural resources, do not contribute much to the
GDP of the country. States such as Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Odisha, Madhya
Pradesh and Rajasthan are rich in minerals and metals, but due to lack of
109
Issues in Indian conducive business environment, many people migrate to other states in search of
Economy
jobs.
(ix) Populist Measures
Political parties have learnt the skill of pursuing populist policy measures so as to
create vote banks. Provision of subsidies eats away a substantial portion of our
budgets. Free electricity to farmers and all households in certain states are major
heads of expenditure. In the process there is little resources left for investment in
capital formation. If productive capacity of the economy does not increase,
employment generation and output growth will be slower. Such populist
measures are not always meant to reduce poverty.
Self-assessment Exercise B
1) Describe the major causes of poverty in India.
…………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………
2) Why is inflation an important cause of poverty in India?
…………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………
3) Comment on the statement that high population growth and illiteracy are the
main causes of poverty in India.
…………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………
FURTHER READING
The following textbooks and online resources can be referred for further in-
depth reading on the topics discussed in this unit.
Deaton and Kozel. The Great Indian Poverty Debate, Laxmi Publications, 1
January 2006
Martin Ravallion. The Debate on Globalization, Poverty, and Inequality: Why
Measurement Matters, Policy Research Working Papers, April, 2003.
Nilakantha Rath and V M Dandekar. Poverty in India, Economic and Political
Weekly, Vol. 6, Issue No. 2, 09 January, 1971
118
Amartya Sen. Poverty and Inequality, Stanford University Press, 2006 Poverty and
Inequality
Jonathan Haughton, Shahidur R. Khandker. Handbook on Poverty + Inequality,
World Bank Publications, 27 March, 2009
Abhijit Banerjee and Esther Duflo. Poor Economics: A Radical Rethinking of the
Way to Fight Global Poverty, 26 April 2011
Paul Collier. The Bottom Billion: Why the Poorest Countries are Failing and
What Can be Done About it, Oxford University Press, 31 August 2012
Gary S. Fields. Poverty, Inequality, and Development, Cambridge University
Press, October 2009,
P. Sainath. Everybody Loves a Good Drought: Stories from India’s Poorest
Districts, Penguin Books, 14 October 2000
Online references:
https://www.drishtiias.com/to-the-points/paper3/poverty-estimation-in-india
World Bank publication. Poverty and Shared Prosperity 2020: Reversals of
Fortune,https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/poverty-and-shared-
prosperity
Amitabh Kundu and P. C. Mohanan. Employment and Inequality Outcomes in
India. https://www.oecd.org/employment/emp/42546020.pdf
Note: These questions/ exercise will help you understand the unit better. Try to
write answers of these questions, but do not submit your answers to the
University for assessment. These questions are for your practice only.
119